Measurement of stratospheric aerosol on Saturn using an Eclipse of Titan

Measurement of stratospheric aerosol on Saturn using an Eclipse of Titan

ICARL'S 48, 5 4 0 (1981) Errata Volume 46, No. 3 (1981), in the article, ""M e a s u r e m e n t o f Stratospheric Aerosol on Saturn Using an Eclips...

35KB Sizes 0 Downloads 32 Views

ICARL'S 48, 5 4 0

(1981)

Errata Volume 46, No. 3 (1981), in the article, ""M e a s u r e m e n t o f Stratospheric Aerosol on Saturn Using an Eclipse o f T i t a n , " by D. W. Smith, R. W. Shorthill, P. E. Johnson, E. Budding, and A. S. Asaad, pp. 424-428: The next to last line o f the abstract as printed reads "'optical depth o f ,,.n-,-o.ova+°°4,, This should read "'optical depth o f ,,.,,-,-0.o~. • cL4+o.o4,. Volume 42, No. 1 (1980), in the article. "'The Phosphine Abundance on Saturn Derived from New 10-Micrometer S p e c t r a , " by A. T. Tokunaga, H. L. Dinerstein, D. F. Lester, and D. M. Rank, pages 79-85: on page 82, column 1, lines 38-41. the PHs column density quoted is correct: however, the H2 column density should read "'50 kin-am,'" instead of "' 19. I km-am.'" With this correction the derived tropospheric [PHa]/[H2] ratio is at least 0.8 × l0 -~, rather than "'2 × l0 -6"' as stated on page 82, column 2, line 42. This is now consistent with the PH3 abundance derived from 3- to 5#zm spectra. All o f the mixing ratios quoted should be reduced by the same amount: the other conclusions of the paper are unchanged. Volume 47, No. I (1981), in the article, " ' S a t u r n ' s E Ring. 1. C C D Observations of March 1980," by W. A. Baum, T. Kreidl, J. A. Westphal, G. E. Danielson, P. K. Seidelmann, D. Pascu, and D. G. Cuttle, pages 84-96, on page 94, column 2, the equation on lines l and 2 should read: (IRE2~'-~-(t_l + bRs} 2 ~ 0.18(FWHM) 2

-

(0.68)

2

arcsec 2.

In the original article, due to a typesetting error, the "'trE 2'' read

540 (opyright (~ 198l by Academic Pres.,. Inc. All rights of reproductkm in any form reserved.

" ' O ' E 6 . "'