^ } = 0 t-»oo
for any ^ > 0. But if f{x) is the function defined earher, then lim /x{|(F, ψ,)\ ^A}
A
= lim ^ , , ( [ - ^ , A]) < lim j f{x) άμ^^{χ) = 0.
1.5. Induced Cylinder Set Measures
L e t Τ be a continuous linear mapping of the hnear topological space 0 2 into the linear topological space Φ^. Denote by T" the mapping of Φί into 0 2 which is adjoint to Γ , i.e., the mapping such that (T"F, φ) = {Fy Τψ) for any φ e 0 2 and F e Φ[, Obviously, if Τ carries the finitedimensional subspace Ψ2 C 0 2 into the finite-dimensional subspace Ψι C 0 j , then T" carries the subspace into the subspace Ψ^. Indeed, suppose that FeWl T h e n ΤφβΨ^ for any ΦΕΨ^, and therefore {Fy Τφ) = 0. But this means that {TTyφ) = 0 for all φβΨ^, i.e., that
ΤΤΕΨΙ
T h u s we have proven that ΤΨζ C F r o m this it follows that the mapping 7" induces a mapping T[ of the factor space Φ^/Ψχ into the factor space 0 2 / ϊ ^ 2 > by which the coset F -\is carried into the coset ΤΨ+Ψ^ (in view of the inclusion ΓΨ^€ΨΙ the correspondence F + - > TT + Ψ2 does not depend upon the choice of representative F in the coset F + Ψ^), T h u s we have proven: If Γ is a continuous hnear mapping of 0 2 into 0 1 , then for every finite-dimensional subspace Ψι C 0 ^ there exsist a hnear mapping T[ of the factor space Φ[ΙΨΙ into the factor space Φ^Ι^Ι^ where ΨΙ denotes the annihilator of the subspace Ψι = ΤΨ^ in Φι, T h e mapping ΤΊ takes the coset F + ΨΙ into the coset TF + ^^2· S u p p o s e now that a cylinder set measure μι is given in 0 ^ . W e intro duce a measure on the cyhnder sets in 0 2 in the following way. S u p p o s e that the cylinder set in 0 2 is defined by the s u b s p a c e Ψ^ (in 0 3 ) a n d the base A^, L e t Ψι = ΤΨ^ and Αι = {Τί)-\Α2) C Φ^/ψ^ W e set μ2{Ζ2) =
μι{Ζι),
where is the cylinder set in Φ[ with generating subspace Ψι and base Ai. It is easy to see that μ2 is a cylinder set measure in 0 2 , and that in view of the continuity of Γ , ^ 2 satisfies the continuity condition. W e will call μ2 the measure induced from μι by the mapping T.
312
MEASURES IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
For example, if Φ„^ is the completion of the countably Hilbert space Φ in the norm || φ then to every measure in Φ ^ there corresponds a measure μ in Φ' (and a measure /x^ in any space Φ^, where η > τη). We will call a measure in Φ' m-continuous if it is induced by a continuous measure in Φ^.
2 . T h e C o u n t a b l e A d d i t i v i t y of C y l i n d e r Set M e a s u r e s in
Spaces A d j o i n t t o N u c l e a r Spaces 2 . 1 . The Addltivlty of Cylinder Set Measures
Cylinder set measures have the following property of finite additivity: If Z i , Z ^ is a finite system of disjoint cylinder sets in Φ', then 1^{\J
Ζ,)=-^μ{Ζ,).
In fact, since, as was shown in Section 1 . 1 , we can find a common generating subspace for any finite system of cylinder sets, this assertion follows from the additivity of the measure νψ in the factor space Φ'/Ψ^. However, the measure μ does not by any means always have the property of countable additivity: it does not follow, generally speaking, that if a cyhnder set Ζ is the union of a countable family Z j , Zg, ... of nonintersecting cylinder sets, then μ{Ζ) =
%μ{Ζ,) k=l
(of course, the equality does hold if all of the Z ^ are defined by the same generating subspace). For us, however, it is essential that μ be countably additive. T h i s is connected with the fact that the class of cylinder sets in Φ' is rather narrow.^ Therefore it is natural to want to extend /x to a wider class of sets. T h i s class is the σ-algebra generated by the (Borel) cyhnder sets. As usual, by the σ-algebra of sets generated by the cylinder sets we mean the smallest class of sets which contains the cylinder sets and is closed under the operations of countable union and complementation. We will call the members of this σ-algebra the Borel sets in Φ'. ^ F o r e x a m p l e , t h e p o l a r o f a s e t ^ C Φ , g e n e r a l l y s p e a k i n g , is n o t a c y l i n d e r s e t i n Φ ' ( t h e polar
o f a s e t A i s t h e s e t o f a l l f u n c t i o n a l s F s u c h t h a t \ (F, φ) \ <
1 f o r all φ e
A).
2.1
Countable Additivity of Measures
313
T h e class of Borel sets is adequately broad; for example, if Φ contains a countable everywhere dense set of elements, then the polar of every set ^ C Φ is a Borel set in Φ'. In the case where the measure /χ, defined on the cylinder sets, is completely additive, it can be extended to all the Borel sets. T h i s extension can be carried out in the following way. We call the cylinder sets Borel sets of the zeroth class. S u p p o s e that Borel sets of class β have already been defined, where β is any transfinite number less than a. We call **Borel sets of class a* all countable unions of nonintersecting sets of class less than α and all complements of such unions. T h u s , Borel sets are defined for all transfinite numbers of the first and second classes. If
is a decomposition of a Borel set of class α into nonintersecting Borel sets of lower classes, then we set μ{Β) =
μ{Β,) k=l
and μ(φ' - β ) = 1 - μ ( β ) . Using the completely additivity of /x for cyhnder sets, we now show that starting from two decompositions
and Β = ^Βί
(or
Β = Φ' -
μ^Βή
of the Borel set Β into nonintersecting Borel sets of lower classes, we always obtain the same value for μ{Β). T h i s is easy to prove for sets of the first class: If
are two decompositions of a set Β of the first class into nonintersecting cyhnder sets, then :)·
314
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
Indeed,
X KZu) = XX
μ{ζ, η ζ;) = XX
μ{ζ, η ζ;) = ν μ(ζ;.).
If now
Ä=l
Ä;=l
then
( Μ ^ · ) " ( Μ ^ > ) = *is a decomposition of Φ' into nonintersecting cylinder sets, and therefore
Χμ{Ζ,)
+
Χ μ { Ζ ί ) = 1 ,
i.e..
T h i s proves that /x is unambiguously defined on Borel sets of class 1. It can be shown that μ remains countably additive following this exten sion. For sets of higher classes the proof is carried out by means of transfinite induction. We remark that the extension of μ to the Borel sets in Φ' has the following property (regularity in the sense of Caratheodory): For any Borel set Β C Φ', μ{Β) = inf/x(Z), where Ζ runs through all countable unions of open cylinder sets Z^ such that Β C U^^i Zj,. T h e proof of this assertion is easily carried out by means of transfinite induction. We will see further on that there exist spaces for which every positive normalized cylinder set measure which has the continuity property is countably additive, and can therefore be extended to all the Borel sets. At the same time, there exist spaces in which not every measure can be extended to the Borel sets, but only measures satisfying certain additional conditions.
2.1
Countable Additivity of M e a s u r e s
315
The class of spaces for which any positive normalized cylinder set measure satisfying the continuity condition can be extended to the Borel sets is the class of spaces which are adjoint to nuclear spaces. T h i s result will be proven in Section 2.4. F o r the proof of this basic result we need certain results of measure theory. First of all we indicate the following simple criterion for the countable additivity of a measure. T h e o r e m 1 . In order that a measure μ on the cylinder sets in Φ ' be countably additive, it is necessary and sufficient that XM(Z*) = 1 for any decomposition Φ' = sets.
U^^i
of Φ' into nonintersecting cyhnder
Proof. T h e necessity of the condition follows directly from the definition of countable additivity. A s for the sufficiency, s u p p o s e that Ζ = \J]c=.i Zj^ is a decomposition of some cylinder set Ζ into nonintersecting cyhnder sets Z^, Zg, .... T h e n the space Φ' can be decomposed into the nonintersecting cylinder sets Φ' — Ζ , Z j , Zg, and therefore by the hypothesis of the theorem
, χ ( Φ ' - Ζ ) + Χ μ ( Ζ , ) = 1.
(1)
F r o m the finite additivity of μ it follows that μ{Φ' -Ζ)
+ μ{Ζ)=\.
(2)
Comparing (1) and (2), we obtain
k=l which proves the countable additivity of μ. T h i s theorem can be stated in another, equivalent, way. T h e o r e m 1'. In order that a measure μ on cylinder sets b e countably additive, it is necessary and sufficient that
litnKZ;) = 0
(3)
for any decreasing sequence Z^ 3 Z 2 3 ... of cyhnder sets whose inter section is empty.
316
Proof.
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
Only the sufficiency of the condition needs to be proven. L e t
be a decomposition of Φ' into nonintersecting cyhnder sets. T h e n the cylinder sets
form a decreasing sequence with empty intersection, and so by hypothesis
limKZ;) = 0 . In view of the finite additivity of /x, this means that lim
1 -
2;
μ{Ζ,) =
0
k=l or, that Σ ^ = ι / χ ( Ζ ^ = T h e o r e m 1.
1. Consequently,
μ is countably additive
by
T h e o r e m Γ ' . In order that the measure μ be countably additive, it is necessary and sufficient that for any sequence {Zj.} of (not necessarily disjoint) cyhnder sets whose union is Φ', Χμ{Ζ,)^\, k=l
(4)
T o prove the sufficiency of this condition, we note that if the sets Zj^ whose union is Φ' are nonintersecting, then in view of the finite additivity of μ one has Χμ{Ζ,)^1.
(5)
On the other hand, inequality (4) is satisfied. Inequalities (4) and (5) imply k=l and therefore μ is countably additive by T h e o r e m 1. T h e necessity of the condition is obvious. Finally, we note that it is sufficient to require only that inequality
2.2
Countable Additivity of Measures
317
(4) hold for all sequences of open cylinder sets whose union is Φ'. T h i s follows at once from the fact that in view of the regularity of μ, for any cyhnder set Ζ we can find some open cylinder set whose measure exceeds that of Ζ by as little as desired.
2.2. A Condition for the Countable Additivity of Cylinder Set Measures in Spaces Adjoint to Countably Hilbert Spaces
T h e conditions for countable additivity given in the preceding section are inconvenient to apply. Here we introduce a condition for the count able additivity of measures on the cylinder sets in spaces adjoint to countably Hilbert spaces, which is more convenient to use. S u p p o s e that the cyhnder set measure μ in the space Φ' adjoint to a countably Hilbert space Φ is countably additive. T h e n , as we have seen above, it can be extended to all the Borel sets in Φ'. In particular, μ can be extended to all balls ^^^(JR) defined by inequalities of the form | | ί Ί Ι _ η < i ? . Indeed, SJ^R) consists of ah continuous hnear functionals on Φ such that φ)| < / ? if || φ ||^ < 1. Choose a countable set { φ ^ of elements which are everywhere dense in the unit ball — {|| φ L < 1} of the Hilbert space Φ^ and which lie in Π Φ. If we denote the strips \(¥,ψ^\ ^ R in Φ' by Aj,, it is obvious that Sn{R)=nA,,
i.e., .S^(/?) is a Borel set in Φ' (moreover, it is a Borel set of class 1). Therefore μ can be extended to every ball. Now let us show that for any € > 0 there is a baU 5^(/?), defined by an inequality of the form || F ||_^ < / ? , such that the μ measure of the com plement of Sn,{R) is less than € (assuming /χ. to be countably additive). Indeed, every element F ΕΦ' belongs to one of the spaces Φ^ and there fore satisfies some inequality of the form < R. Therefore Φ' is a countable union of balls, 00
Φ'=
ύΟ
U^U5„(Ä).
Since m ^ η implies that ^ ||/^||_n for any element ΡΕΦ', then 8γ^^ι) C 5^+i(« + 1). Consequently, Φ' is the union of an increasing sequence of balls S^Jji), i.e., Φ' =
U Sn{n)y
n=l
318
MEASURES IN
LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
where S,(\)CS,{2)C,... Since μ{Φ') =
1, we have
But this shows that for any € > 0 there is an η such that the complement of Sγ^{n) has measure less than c. We have therefore proven the following assertion. T h e o r e m 2 . If is a positive normahzed countably additive cyhnder set measure in the adjoint space Φ' of a countably Hilbert space Φ, then for any e > 0 there is a ball S^iR) such that the /x-measure of any cylinder set Ζ lying outside S^{R) is less than e. Now we prove that the converse also holds. T h e o r e m 2'· S u p p o s e that μ is a positive normalized cylinder set measure on the adjoint space Φ' of a countably Hilbert space Φ. If for any € > 0 there is a ball S^iR) in Φ' such that the measure of any cylinder set lying outside is less than e, then μ is countably additive. For the proof of T h e o r e m 2' we need the following lemma. L e m m a 1 . F r o m any covering of a ball S{R) = {|| φ || < i ? } in a Hilbert space Η by open cylinder sets, one can extract a finite subcovering. A cylinder set in a Hilbert space Η is defined by the condition {{ψ>
...,(
which holds for all φ Ε Γ φ and therefore for all φ G Γ ^ , it follows that μ(Γ;)= f i>
ί
\{φ,φ)\^μ{φ)
\{ψ,φ)\^μ{φ)
=
{Βηψ,ψ)^^.
S(R)
Hence /χ(Γ^) < 1/η. T h u s we have constructed a sequence B^, B^, ... of positive-definite nuclear operators such that the inequality φ) < l/2n implies μ{Τ^ ^ l//z, where is the strip defined by \{ψ,φ)\ ^ 1. T h i s means that μ is continuous relative to the topology in Η defined by the Bj^, and proves the necessity of the condition of the theorem. T h e sufficiency of the condition can be proven by using L e m m a 4. We omit the details of this proof.
3. Gaussian Measures in L i n e a r T o p o l o g i c a l Spaces 3.1. Definition of Gaussian Measures We will consider here Gaussian measures in linear topological spaces. First we describe Gaussian measures in the finite-dimensional case. Let be an n-dimensional linear space, in which is defined a scalar product {x, y). T h i s scalar product defines a metric in and, in particu lar, defines L e b e s g u e measure in i?^. We introduce the G a u s s i a n measure in i?^ corresponding to the scalar product (Λ;, y), setting
'^(^) =
( 2 ^
In other words, Gaussian measures in an n-dimensional linear space are always defined by means of scalar products. If ^ is a non-degenerate linear transformation in and. (Λ:, y) is a scalar product in JR^^, then (x, y \ = {Ax, Ay) is also a scalar product. T o this scalar product there corresponds the G a u s s i a n measure
(27r)^^J X
where d^x denotes the L e b e s g u e measure corresponding to the scalar
336
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
product ( j c , It is easy to see that d^x measure μ, can be written in the form μ,{χ)
=
det A
Ch. IV
| det ^ | dx. Therefore the
I
We note the following lemma concerning Gaussian measures in finite-dimensional spaces, which we wiH use further on. L e m m a 1 . Let R^^ be an w-dimensional Euclidean space with scalar product {x, y)y and R,,^ an m-dimensional subspace in R^^. L e t μ^^ be the Gaussian measure in R^ corresponding to the scalar product {Xy y), and denote by μ,,^ the Gaussian measure in R^^ corresponding to the same scalar product. T h e n for any subset X of R^^^ we have the following compatibility condition between μ „ and /χ„^: μ.η(^) = ^n[Q-Kx)l
(2)
where Q denotes the operator of orthogonal projection of
onto R„^.
Proof. L e t R ^ - m denote the inverse image of the origin with respect to Q. Obviously is the orthogonal s u m of the subspaces and Rn-my therefore any Λ: e i?^ can be written in unique fashion as X = x' x'\ where x' e R^,^ and x" e R n - m - It is also obvious that {x,y) = {x\y')
+
(x'\y"\
and that the L e b e s g u e measure dx in R^ is the product of the L e b e s g u e measures dx' in R^^^ and dx" in Rn_,y^y defined by the scalar product (A:, y). Since the set Q~\X) is the orthogonal s u m of X and we have
^
1
Since 1 (2^)i"
g-Hx',x')
dx',
to prove (2) it suffices to verify that 1 {Inf (n-m)
(3)
3.1
Gaussian Measures
337
But in coordinate form, the integral in (3) is ^
^expl-liW'f
+
... +
K-rnf]]
dx{' ... dx-_,,.
(3')
Since txp{-^x^)dx
=
νίπ,
the integral (3') is equal to 1, which proves (2). Along with the Gaussian measures just considered, so-called improper (or degenerate) Gaussian measures can also be considered. T h e s e are defined by a formula of the form
where i ? ^ is an m-dimensional hnear subspace of {Xy y) is a scalar product in 7 ? ^ , and dx is the L e b e s g u e measure in defined by this scalar product. Let us now proceed to the construction of Gaussian measures in the infinite-dimensional case. T h e s e measures will be constructed in the conjugate space Φ' of a locally convex linear topological space Φ. As we saw in Section 1.1, the local convexity of Φ guarantees that any linear functional on any subspace Ψ oi Φ can be extended to a hnear functional on all of Φ. In addition, the conjugate space Ψ' of any finite-dimensional subspace Ψ of Φ is isomorphic to the factor space Φ'/Ψ^, where denotes the annihilator of Ψ (i.e., the collection of all linear functionals on Φ such that {Fy φ) = 0 for φ e Ψ), Gaussian measures in an infinite-dimensional space Φ' are defined by means of scalar products Β{φ, φ) defined in Φ. T h u s , suppose that B{ψy φ) is a nondegenerate scalar product in a real locally convex linear topological space Φ, continuous in the topology of Φ. First we define a Gaussian measure in every finite-dimensional subspace Ψ of Φ by means of the scalar product β ( φ , φ)y and then we carry over these measures to the factor spaces Φ'/Ψ^. We define a measure τψ in each w-dimensional subspace Ψ oi Φ by
where dφ is the L e b e s g u e measure in Ψ corresponding to the scalar product Β{φ, φ). In view of L e m m a 1 these measures are compatible in the following sense: If C ψ^, then for any Y C we have =
r,[Q-i\y)l
(6)
338
MEASURES
IN LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
where denotes the operator of orthogonal projection of Ψ2 onto Ψι (relative to the scalar product Β{φ, φ)), and t j , are the measures Τψ^ and Τψ^. We remark that the finite-dimensional Euclidean space Ψ (with scalar product β ( φ , φ)) is isomorphic to its conjugate space But, as was pointed out above, the space Ψ' is isomorphic to the factor space Φ'/Ψ^. We have thus established a natural isomorphism A ψ between Ψ and Φ'/Ψ^. I n view of this isomorphism there corresponds to the measure Τψ ιηΨ ζ measure νψ in Φ'/Ψ^, defined by νψ{Χ) = τψ[Α-\Χ)1
Χ€Φ'/Ψ^,
(7)
Let us show that the measures νψ define a measure on the cyhnder sets in Φ', i.e., that they are compatible. For this, according to Section 1 . 3 , it suffices to show that if C ψ^, then for any set X C Φ'/Ψζ one has^ v,{X) = v,[Q-\X)l
(8)
where Q denotes the natural mapping of Φ'/ΨΙ into Φ'/¥^ί. In view of ( 7 ) , we can write ( 8 ) , which is to be proven, in the following form: r^[A-\X)] = r,[A-^Q-\X)] (we have denoted Αψ^ and Αψ^ by Ai and A2 respectively). If we set Αΐ\Χ) = y , then this equation becomes τ , ( Υ ) = r,[A-^Q-^A,{Y)].
(9)
In view of relation (6) it remains to show that the m a p p i n g 5 i = A^^QA^ is the orthogonal projection of onto Ψ^. B u t this follows directly from the fact that Al^QA^ acts on elements φ^Ψ^ according to the scheme φ—^Α,φ
+ Ψ',—^Α,φ +
ΨΙ—^Φ. Λ-
and on elements φ in the orthogonal complement of
in
according
t o 3
φ ^
>Α.ψ + '
>
^
Q
> ^
0.
Λ-^
T h i s proves that the measures νψ are compatible. ^ With every element
φ € Ψ we a s s o c i a t e t h e l i n e a r f u n c t i o n a l F ^ , , d e f i n e d b y Fy,{φ)
=
(B φ, φ). F r o m t h e n o n d e g e n e r a c y of Β {φ, φ) i t f o l l o w s t h a t t h e i m a g e o f Ψ i s a l l o f Ψ\ ^ W e d e n o t e h e r e νψ^ b y V J , νψ^ b y VG» a n d f u r t h e r τψ^ b y 3 S i n c e Β{ψ, φ) = 0 , V e Ψ^, f o r s u c h
a n d τψ^ b y T J .
a n d t h e r e f o r e Α^ψ - f
3.2
Gaussian Measures
339
We denote by μ the measure defined on the cyHnder sets of Φ' by the F r o m the fact that the scalar product φ) was a s s u m e d to be continuous in the topology of Φ, it follows easily that the measure μ satisfies the continuity condition. We omit the simple proof of this statement, which involves writing down the measures in coordinate form. One can remove the condition of nondegeneracy that was imposed upon Β(φ, φ). A s s u m e that there are nonzero elements ψ for which Β{φ, φ) = Ο, and let X be the totality of all such φ. T h e n is a linear subspace of Φ which is closed in view of the assumed continuity of φ). L e t be the subspace in Φ' consisting of all continuous linear functionals F which vanish on X, T h e n X^ is the conjugate space of the factor space Φ / Χ , and Β{φ, φ) induces a nondegenerate scalar product Βι{φ, φ) on the latter. We can therefore construct the Gaussian measure μι in X^ defined by the scalar product Βι(φ, φ). T h e measure μ in Φ', defined for any cyHnder set Y in Φ' by μ{Υ)=μ,(ΥηΧ^). is called a Gaussian measure in Φ'. S u c h G a u s s i a n measures, which are concentrated on subspaces of Φ', are called degenerate or improper. Let us now stop to consider the case where Φ is a Hilbert space, and the Gaussian measure μ is defined by the scalar product (φ, φ) in Φ. In this case the spaces Φ and Φ' can be identified, and we can s u p p o s e that μ is defined in the space Φ itself. T h e cyHnder sets Ζ in Φ are the or thogonal s u m s of subspaces of Φ, having finite-dimensional orthogonal complements A, with (Borel) sets X lying in A. T h e measure of such a cyHnder set is given by (2π) where (φ, φ) is the scalar product induced in the finite dimensional subspace A by the scalar product in Φ, and άφ is the corresponding L e b e s g u e measure in A.
3.2. A Condition for the Countable Additivity of Gaussian Measures in the Conjugate Spaces of Countably Hilbert Spaces In T h e o r e m 4 of Section 2, it was shown that if a measure μι in a Hilbert space Hi satisfies the continuity condition and if T" is a H i l b e r t -
340
MEASURES IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
Schmidt mapping of into a Hilbert space H^y then the measure /xg in i / 2 > induced by Τ and / x j , is countably additive. With the help of this theorem it is easy to show a sufficient condition for a Gaussian measure μ, defined in the conjugate space Φ' of a countably Hilbert space Φ by a scalar product Β{φ, φ) in Φ, to be countably additive. Let Β{φ, φ) be a scalar product (nondegenerate) in a countably Hilbert space Φ, which is continuous jointly in both arguments relative to the topology of Φ.+ Completing Φ relative to this scalar product, we obtain a Hilbert space Φβ. F r o m the continuity of Β{φ, φ) it follows that the natural imbedding of Φ into Φβ is continuous. Therefore there is an m such that for w > m the imbedding of the Hilbert space Φ^ into Φβ is continuous (Φ^ is the completion of Φ relative to the scalar product (φ, 0 ) J . A sufficient condition for the countable additivity of the Gaussian measure,on Φ' defined by Β{φ, φ) is given by the following theorem. T h e o r e m 1 . In order that the measure μ, defined in the conjugate space Φ' of a countably Hilbert space Φ by a continuous nondegenerate scalar product Β{φ, φ), be countably additive, it is sufficient that for some η the mapping T^^ of Φ^ into Φβ be of H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t class. Proof. T h e scalar product Β{φ, φ) in the Hilbert space Φβ defines a Gaussian measure μ, in the conjugate space Φβ which satisfies the continuity condition. T h e mapping adjoint to m a p s Φβ into Φ^ and is also H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t . N o w apply T h e o r e m 4 of Section 2 to the Hilbert spaces Φβ and Φ^ and to the measure μ, in Φβ. We find that μ, induces a countably additive measure /x^ in Φ^, which in turn induces a countably additive measure in Φ'. Obviously this last measure coincides with the measure μ defined in Φ' by the scalar product Β{φ, φ), which is thus countably additive. T h e proof of T h e o r e m 1 was based upon T h e o r e m 4 of Section 2. T h e central and most difficult point in the proof of the latter theorem was to establish the inequality 1 -
μ{Κ) < c(e +
Η-ηκη
(cf. L e m m a 4 of Section 2). For Gaussian measures one can avoid this inequality by using the more simply proven inequality
t B y T h e o r e m 3 o f C h a p t e r I , S e c t i o n 1 . 2 , it is s u f f i c i e n t t h a t Β{ψ, in e a c h a r g u m e n t s e p a r a t e l y .
φ) b e c o n t i n u o u s
3.2
Gaussian Measures
341
Here C{x, x) denotes a strictly positive-definite quadratic form in the space Tr(C"^) denotes the trace of the matrix C"^, and Ω denotes the region outside the sphere of radius r and center at the origin of i?^. In order to prove inequality (10), we note that
Rn
where χ{χ) denotes the characteristic function of the region ß . Since χ{χ) = 1 for those χ satisfying (Λ:, X) > and vanishes for those χ satisfying (Λ:, Λ:) : ζ r^, then the inequality χ{χ) < (Λ:, x)lr^ holds for aU xe It follows that
(27r)^^r2
{x.x)e-'^^^^^^^dx.
Applying formula (4) of Section 2.2, Chapter I I I , to the right side of this inequality, we obtain
which proves inequality (10). Now we prove the following lemma. L e m m a 2. If μ is the Gaussian measure in a Hilbert space Η which is defined by the scalar product {ψ, φ) in i / , and Γ is a H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t mapping of Η into a Hilbert space H^, then the measure μι in Hi^ induced by Τ and /x, is countably additive. Proof. According to T h e o r e m 2 of Section 2, it suffices, for the proof of the countable additivity of μι, to show that for any € > 0 there is a ball Si{r) with radius r and center at the origin in Hi such that the measure of any cylinder set lying outside Si{r) is less than e. One constructs Si{r) in the following way. L e t T" be the mapping of Hi into Η which is adjoint to Γ , and consider the operator Q = T'T. Since Τ is of Hilbert-Schmidt class, then by T h e o r e m 4 of Chapter I, Section 2.3, 0 is a nuclear operator. L e t r be any number such that T r ρ < er^, where T r Q is the trace of Q, T h e n r is the desired radius. T o prove this assertion it suffices to write out the explicit expression for μι and to apply inequality (10). We omit the details of the argument. T h e o r e m 1 follows directly from L e m m a 2. Indeed, the scalar product Β{ψ, φ) defines a Gaussian measure μβ in the conjugate space Φβ of Φβ. But the mapping of into Φβ is, by hypothesis, of H i l b e r t Schmidt class. Therefore its adjoint Γ^, which maps Φβ into Φ^, is of
342
MEASURES IN
LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
Hilbert-Schmidt class. But then the measure /x^, induced in Φή by /x^ and Tliy is countably additive by L e m m a 2 , as is therefore the measure μ induced in Φ' by /x^. But μ is none other than the measure defined in Φ' by Β{φ, φ). T h i s proves T h e o r e m 1. In view of T h e o r e m 3 of Section 2 , any Gaussian measure in the conjugate space Φ' of a nuclear space Φ is countably additive (we remark that this assertion can also be proven more simply than the general case, by using inequality ( 1 0 ) ) . Now we show that the requirement of nuclearity of the space is not only a sufficient, but also a necessary condition for every G a u s s i a n measure in the conjugate space Φ' of the countably Hilbert space Φ to be countably additive. T o do this, we need the following estimate for Gau§sian measures in a Euchdean space R^. L e m m a 3. Let μ be the Gaussian measure in n-dimensional Euchdean space defined by the scalar product {x, y) in R^y and let Ω denote the region defined by the inequalities Tr C - 2 V T r C < C\x, x)^TrC
+ 2 VTr
C,
where C{Xy x) is a positive-definite quadratic form in R^^, and T r C is the trace of the matrix C consisting of the coefliicients of the quadratic form. T h e n μ{Ω)>1^^1±~±^\ where λ^,
(11)
are the eigenvalues of C *
Proof. Let χ{χ) denote the characteristic function of the region Ω. Obviously the inequality
c
_ XW
[C{x,x)-TrCY 4
^ 1
is satisfied for all points χ e R„. Therefore
Rn J
Rn Λ
(Γίτ νλν^ -_ 9 {C{x, x)f 2
(12) Tr -(- (Tr i'l'r TV rC(x. CC{x, X) +
Cf
.
* T h e reader c a n w i t h o u t difficulty establish the c o n n e c t i o n o f this l e m m a with t h e well-known C h e b y s h e v inequality of probability theory.
3.2
Gaussian Measures
343
F r o m formula (4) of Section 2.2, Chapter I I I , it follows that
and therefore μ{Ω) > 1 -
I
[(Cix, x)Y - (Tr cy]
άμ{χ).
In order to estimate the integral
we choose a Cartesian coordinate system in R^^^ in which the form C{x, x) reduces to a s u m of squares C{x,x) = X,x\+
...+K=cl
T h e n the above integral assumes the form I (λΛ" 4- ... + λ,,ν^)·^ e x p [ - ^ ( * ? + ... +
^
4)]
But for y # Ä L - J (2π)
e x p [ - i ( * ? + ... + 4)]
= 1,
and 1 (2„).n J
«χρ[-έ(*? + - +
dx = 3,
and therefore the integral under consideration is equal to
Consequently, in view of inequality (11)
= 1 -
λ? + . . . + λΐ 2TrC
T h i s proves L e m m a 3.
344
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
Consider the Gaussian measure μ in a (real) Hilbert space H, defined by the scalar product (φ, φ) in Η. Let Τ be an operator which maps Η into another Hilbert space H^, and denote by μ^ the measure induced in Hi by μ and T. We prove the following lemma. L e m m a 4. If Τ is not of Hilbert-Schmidt class, and || Γ | | < 1, then for any r > 0 there is a cylinder set Ζ in H^, lying outside the ball Si{r) in H^ with radius r and center at zero, whose measure is greater than 1 /2. Proof. Consider first the case where the positive-definite operator Q = T'T has a pure discrete spectrum. Let λ^, Ag, ... be the eigenvalues of Qy and A^, Ag, ... the corresponding normalized eigenvectors. O b viously the inverse image of the ball 5 i ( r ) under the mapping Τ is the set Ω in Η defined by the inequality ( Γ φ , Τφ) < r^, or equivalently {Qφy φ) ^ r^. In coordinate form the set Ω is defined by the inequality %λ,{φ.Η,γ^/Κ
(13)
A=l We note that the series Σ^=.ι λ^. diverges, because Τ is by hypothesis not of Hilbert-Schmidt class, and so Q is not a nuclear operator. Con sequently, there are m and η such that
A,-2V
X
X
X , ^ r \
(14)
We now assert that the desired cyhnder set Ζ in / / is the cylinder set defined in coordinate form by ^
λ,{φ,Η,Υ^τΚ
(15)
A = m 4 1
Indeed, comparing this inequality with (13), we conclude that Ζ hes outside the region ß . Let us now estimate the measure of Z . In view of inequality (14), the set Ζ contains the set Z^, defined by the inequalities
/1-2\//Γ<
X
λ,Χφ, h,Y ^ A-\-2 VA,
where A = ^k=m+i K- Therefore μ{Ζ) L e m m a 3 we have the estimate /'Z
\
^
ί
^' ' -
^m+l
> μ{Ζι).
+ ··· + Xn
2 ( λ . . , + ... + λ„) ·
But
according to
4.1
Fourier T r a n s f o r m s of Measures
345
Since by hypothesis || ΤΊ| < I, it foUows that λ^. < 1 for all k. Therefore we obtain μ{Ζ) ^ μ{Ζ-^ T h u s we have proven that μ{Ζ) ^ ^. M a p p i n g Ζ into H^, we obtain a cyhnder set in H^, lying outside 5Ί(Γ) and having measure at least \ . T h i s proves L e m m a 4 when T'T has a discrete spectrum. When the spectrum of T'T is not purely discrete, the proof is carried out in similar fashion, replacing the vectors h^, Ag, ... by orthonormal vectors φ^, ··· such that (T"Γφ^, ψJ^ > C > 0 (the existence of these vectors follows directly from the fact that the spectrum of T'T is not purely discrete). We omit the details. We can now prove that if a countably Hilbert space Φ is not nuclear, then there exists a Gaussian measure μ in the conjugate space Φ' which is not countably additive. Indeed, since Φ is not nuclear, there exists an m such that the mapping of Φ^ into Φ ^ is not of H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t class for any η > m. T h e n the adjoint operators ( Γ ^ ) ' are also not of H i l b e r t - S c h m i d t class. N o w consider the Gaussian measure μ^^ in Φ ^ defined by the scalar product (F, G)_„,. T h i s measure induces a measure /x^ in each of the Φ^ and a measure μ in Φ'. L e t us show that μ is not countably additive. Indeed, since ( T ^ ) ' is not Hilbert-Schmidt for any n ^ m , then by L e m m a 4 there exists, for any η and r, a cyhnder set Ζ in Φ^ lying outside the ball {FyF)_^ < r^, whose measure is at least \ ( L e m m a 4 applies since it is clear, from the monotonicity of the inner products in a countably Hilbert space, that || || < 1). But then T h e o r e m 2 of Section 2 implies that μ is not countably additive. We have thus proven the following theorem. T h e o r e m 2 . In order that every Gaussian measure in the conjugate space Φ' of a given countably Hilbert space Φ be countably additive, it is necessary and suflScient that Φ be a nuclear space. Obviously the nuclearity of Φ is α fortiori necessary for the countable additivity of all (not only Gaussian) measures in Φ'. 4. F o u r i e r T r a n s f o r m s of M e a s u r e s in L i n e a r T o p o l o g i c a l Spaces
4.1. Definition of the Fourier Transform of a Measure T h e Fourier transform of a nonnegative measure μ in w-dimensional Euclidean space R^, is defined as the function f{x) given by f{x) = ^ e^^-^y^ άμ{γ), Let us carry over this definition to a linear topological space.
(1)
346
MEASURES IN LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
Let Φ be a hnear topological space and μ a cylinder set measure in the conjugate space Φ'. We define the Fourier transform of μ as the (non linear) functional L{ψ) defined on Φ by L(^) = J.^<^.^)^MF).
(2)
We remark that to compute L{ψ) it suffices to know the measures of half-spaces in Φ'. Indeed, if 9? G Φ, then the inequality ( F , ψ) defines a half-space in Φ', whose measure we denote by μφ{χ). T h e n L{ψ) can be written in the form L ( 9 ) = \e^-dμ,{xy
(3)
We note that for positive λ the half-space ( F , λψ) < χ coincides with the half-space (jP, ψ) ^ xjX, Therefore for all positive λ we have 1(λφ) = J
άμ>^{χ) = \
άμ, (|)
= J
άμ^χ).
(4)
Now if λ < 0, then the half-space ( F , λφ) < χ coincides with the halfspace (F, 9?) > x/Xy and therefore at the points of continuity of the function μλφ{χ) we have
Therefore 1{Χφ) = I e^- άμφ)
=-je^-
άμ, (^)
= J e^'- άμφ{χ)
also holds for λ < 0. It is easy to show that if 7^ is a finite-dimensional subspace in Φ and μψ is the measure in the factor space Φ'ΙΨ^ corresponding to /x, then for any φβΨ one has 1{φ)=(
/^^^^^
άμψ(Ρ),
(5)
Indeed, if φ G Ψ, then the half-space ( F , φ) ^ χ consists of cosets with respect to the subspace in Φ'. Therefore the /it-measure of this halfspace in Φ' coincides with the /x,p-measure of the half-space ( F , φ) ^ x in Φ'ΙΨ^. Since the Fourier transform of a measure is uniquely defined by the measures of half-spaces, this proves (5).
4.2
Fourier T r a n s f o r m s of M e a s u r e s
347
Äis an example, let us calculate the Fourier transform of the G a u s s i a n measure μ defined by a functional ß(
r«
1
/
-x'
the functional Ε{φ) is given by 1
r"^
/
X'^
\
But this integral equals ^ - ^ ^ ^ ^ Μ Γ ^ It follows that 1{ψ)
=
^-i^iv.^).
(6)
4.2. Positive-Definite Functionals on Linear Topological Spaces L e t L ( 9 ) be a functional on a hnear topological space Φ. T h i s functional is called positive-definite if V
L(9>, - ψ,)ξ-ξ^ > 0
(7)
for any elements φι, in Φ and any complex n u m b e r s ^i, i^. An example of a positive-definite functional is furnished by any functional Ε{ψ) which is the Fourier transform of a cylinder set measure in the conjugate space Φ' of Φ (recall that we are considering only positive normalized measures). Indeed, suppose that Ε{φ) is the Fourier transform of a measure μ. L e t Ψ be the finite-dimensional subspace spanned by the elements φι, φ,^^ and let μψ be the measure in the factor space φ'/ψ^ corresponding to the measure μ. T h e n for φ sW, ^{ψ) is given by formula (5). But then we have % L(φ, - φ , ) ί , | , =
^
a ,
ί m
/''^'^rn' 2
from which it is evident that ^ φ ) is positive-definite.
dμψ{F)
348
MEASURES
IN LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch. IV
Let us remark that if μ satisfies the continuity condition, then its Fourier transform is continuous. In fact, suppose that the sequence { 9 ^ } converges to the element e Φ. L e t /x^ be the measure on the line corresponding to the element φ^, and /x^ the measure corresponding to φQ. T h e n L{9n)=
i^^^^i^nW,
«=
0,1,....
J
But the continuity condition says that J / ( ^ ) dH'nix) = jf{x) αμο{χ) for any bounded continuous function f{x). L e t t i n g / ( j c ) = e^^, we obtain lim^^oo L{Tn) ^ ^(TO)> which shows that ^φ) is continuous. Lastly, we note that L ( 0 ) = 1, since the measure / X Q corresponding to the zero element is concentrated at the point χ ^ 0 , and therefore e-^^oW
1.
T h u s we see that the Fourier transform ^φ) of any measure on the cyhnder sets in Φ' is positive-definite and continuous (in the sequential sense) and L ( 0 ) = I. N o w we show that these conditions are not only necessary, but also sufficient for a functional L((p) to be the Fourier transform of some cyhnder set measure in Φ'. T h e o r e m 1 . In order that a functional L{φ) on a hnear topological space Φ be the Fourier transform of some cylinder set measure in the conjugate space Φ', it is necessary and sufficient that L{φ) be positivedefinite and continuous (in the sequential sense) and that L ( 0 ) = 1 . Proof. T h e necessity of the conditions was proven above. T o show their sufficiency, let L((p) be a functional satisfying the conditions of the theorem. Considering Ε{φ) on a finite-dimensional subspace Ψ of Φ, we obtain a positive-definite continuous function Lψ{φ) on Ψ. By Bochner's theorem (cf. Chapter I I , Section 3 . 2 ) this function is the Fourier transform of a positive measure μψ defined in the conjugate space Ψ' of Ψ. But we have seen in Section 3 . 1 that Ψ' can be identified in a natural way v/ith the factor space Φ'/Ψ^, where Ψ^ consists of all hnear functionals F which vanish on Ψ, It follows that in each of the factor spaces Φ'/Ψ^, where Ψ is finite dimensional, there is defined a measure μψ. It remains for us to show that these measures are compatible and satisfy the continuity condition.
4.2
Fourier T r a n s f o r m s of Measures
349
T o prove compatibility, consider two finite-dimensional subspaces Ψι, with Ψι C ψ^ in Φ, and let and μ^ be the measures correspond ing to them. We have to prove that μ^ coincides with the measure ν induced in the factor space Φ'/Ψ^ by JLIG- I^i other words, we must prove that μι{Α) = v{A) = μ,[ρ-\Α)]
(8)
for any set A in Φ'/Ψ^, where Q denotes the mapping of Φ'ΙΨΐ onto Φ'ΙΨΙ by which the coset F + Ψΐ is carried into the coset F + Ψ^. We prove (8) by showing that the Fourier transforms of the measures μι and V coincide. T h e Fourier transform of μι is by definition of μι the function Lι{φ) defined on Ψι and coinciding there with T h e Fourier transform of V is also defined on Ψι, and is given by (9)
dv(F).
ei(F,^)
If φ G Ψ I, then the value of {F, ψ) is the same for all functionals F belonging to the same coset FQ + Ψ\, Since, moreover, ν and μ^ are related by (8), we can rewrite (9) in the form
T h u s (9) is the Fourier transform of μ^ for all elements φ G Ψι. But by definition of μ^ this Fourier transform is that function L^^) on Ψ^ which coincides there with L{(p). But L^^) and L^^) coincide on Ψι, since L^ψ) = Ε{φ) = L2{φ) for φ e Ψι. T h u s the Fourier transforms of μι and ν coincide. But then μι and ν coincide, which proves that the measures μ ψ are compatible. We can thus associate with the functional ^φ) a cylinder set measure μ in Φ'. It remains for us to show that μ satisfies the continuity condition. For this we use the following theorem from the theory of Fourier in tegrals: // a sequence
{/ut^}
of positive normalized measures is such that lim ί e'^^ άμη{χ) = ί β^'- dμo{x\ W->00 J
J
for any value of X, then the measures μ^ converge weakly to μ^.^ ^ A sequence
o f m e a s u r e s is s a i d t o c o n v e r g e H m ί / ( Λ ; ) άμη{χ) Η-^» J
for any b o u n d e d
continuous function
f{x).
=
(f{x) J
w e a k l y t o a m e a s u r e μο, άμ,{χ)
if
350
MEASURES IN L I N E A R TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
T o prove, nov^, that μ satisfies the continuity condition, let {φ^} be a sequence of elements in Φ which converges to an element φο» /x^ be the measure corresponding to φ^, w = 0 , 1, ... . T h e n for any real value of λ we have 1(λφη)
=
j e''^ άμη{χ\
n =
0,
1,...
(cf. formula ( 4 ) ) . Since in view of the continuity of Ε{φ) we have lim^^oo ^^Ψn)
= H^9o)y then for any λ lim|e*-^-^,(^)= |.^^-φο(Λ
But this, as we said, imphes that the measures / L C ^ , η = 1, 2 , ... converge weakly to μQ. T h u s the measure μ which we have constructed on the cylinder sets of Φ' satisfies the continuity condition (cf. Section 1 . 4 ) , which concludes the proof of the theorem. If Φ is a nuclear space, then by T h e o r e m 3 of Section 2 , any cylinder set measure in Φ' which satisfies the continuity condition is countably additive. We therefore have the following assertion. T h e o r e m 2 . Any continuous^ positive-definite functional Ζ,(φ) on a nuclear space Φ, such that L ( 0 ) = 1, is the Fourier transform of a countably additive positive normalized measure in Φ'. T h i s theorem is simply Bochner's theorem for nuclear spaces.
5. Q u a s i - I n v a r i a n t Measures in L i n e a r Topological Spaces 5 . 1 . Invariant and Quasi-Invariant Measures in Finite-Dimensional Spaces In this section we will consider questions connected with the trans formation of measures in linear topological spaces by parallel displace ment. By the term **measure" we mean a positive countably additive measure μ{Χ) on the Borel sets in a conjugate space Φ', which is regular in the sense of Caratheodory, and such that the entire space is a countable union of sets of finite measure (this last property is called the σ-finiteness
of μ). t S i n c e a n u c l e a r s p a c e h a s a m e t r i c t o p o l o g y (cf. f o o t n o t e o n p . 57), sequential continuity are equivalent.
continuity and
5.1
Quasi-Invariant Measures
351
We start by considering measures in finite-dimensional linear spaces. In a finite-dimensional linear space there exists L e b e s g u e measure μο{Χ) v^hich is invariant under any parallel displacement in Ä^. In other words, the measure μο{Χ) is such that μο{Χ) = μο{γ + Χ) for all vectors y and measurable sets X in 7?^^. T h e property of invariance under parallel displacement is characteristic for L e b e s g u e m e a s u r e s — any two measures which are invariant under all parallel displacements are identical up to a constant factor. Let us now consider measures which are equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure. We say that two measures μ and ν are equivalent, if they have the same family of null sets (i.e., if μ{Χ) = 0 implies v{X) = 0 and conversely). A description of all measures equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure is given by the following theorem. T h e o r e m 1 . Any measure μ in i ? ^ which is equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure has the form μ{Χ)=
ί
f{x)dx,
where f{x) is a strictly positive function which is s u m m a b l e over every bounded set in Proof. Since μο{Χ) = 0 imphes μ{Χ) = 0, by the R a d o n - N i k o d y m theorem^ there exists a finite-valued nonnegative measurable function f{x) such that μ{Χ)=
( f{x)dx
(1)
for all measurable sets X in 7?^. L e t XQ denote the set of points at which f{x) = 0. Obviously μ{Χ,)=
ί
f{x)dx
= 0;
since μ and /XQ are by hypothesis equivalent, μο{Χ) = 0. Consequently f{x) is almost everywhere positive. Since f(x) can be altered on a set of ^ T h e R a d o n - N i k o d y m theorem says the
following:
S u p p o s e t h a t μ a n d ν a r e m e a s u r e s s u c h t h a t μ{Χ) Then
there exists a
finite-valued
nonnegative MAT)
f o r a l l m e a s u r a b l e s e t s X.
=
J ' X
T h e f u n c t i o n f{x)
= 0 f o r a l l s e t s Xof
m e a s u r a b l e f u n c t i o n f{x)
v-measure zero. such
that
f{x)dv(x)
is d e f i n e d u p t o a s e t o f v - m e a s u r e z e r o .
352
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
L e b e s g u e measure zero without affecting (1), we can suppose that it is positive everywhere. Lastly, we show that f{x) is summable over any bounded set. Since μ and μ^ are equivalent and the L e b e s g u e measure of a point x Ε R^^ is zero, then μ{{χ}) — 0 for all χ G R^^. But since we assumed that μ is regular in the sense of Caratheodory, for every χ e R^ there is an open set V{x) containing χ whose /x-measure is finite. Since any closed bounded set X in R^^ can be covered by a finite number of the V{x) (and hence any bounded set can), the /x-measure of any bounded set is finite. We remark that the L e b e s g u e measure /XQ is expressible in terms of μ by the formula
UX)
=
j
άμ{χΙ
As a matter of fact, if μ and ν are measures equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure, then they are mutually equivalent, and considerations similar to those used in the proof of the preceding theorem show that we have
.(X)=
/,Χχ)αμ{χ\
where f,iv{x) is summable (relative to μ) over every bounded set and is positive for all x. Measures μ which are equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure have the following weakened property of invariance under parallel displacement. If a set X has /x-measure zero, then every translate of X has/x-measure zero. Indeed, from the invariance of L e b e s g u e measure and the definition of equivalence we have the chain of implications ^(X) ^ 0 -
μ,{Χ)
= 0 -
μ,{γ + X) = 0^
μ{γ + Χ) =
0.
A measure which has the property that μ{Χ) = 0 implies μ{γ + X) = 0 for all y will be called quasi-invariant (relative to parallel displace ment = translation). We have therefore proven that all measures which are equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure are quasi-invariant. T h e converse is also true. T h e o r e m 2. If a measure μ is quasi-invariant, then it is equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure. First we prove the following lemma.
5.1
Quasi-Invariant Measures
353
L e m m a 1 . If a measure μ is quasi-invariant, then the /x-measure of any bounded set is finite. Proof. T h e quasi-invariance of μ implies that the /x-measure of each point xe is zero. Indeed, if for some XQ one had μ({χο}) > 0, then this would imply μ{{χ}) > 0 for all x. T h u s any set containing a nondenumerable number of points would contain an infinite number of points whose measures all exceed some fixed positive constant, and therefore the set would have infinite measure. But this clearly contradicts the σ-finiteness of μ. Now the regularity of μ implies that for every Λ: G there is an open set V{x) containing χ which has finite /x-measure. Since any closed bounded set (and therefore any bounded set) can be covered by finitely many of the V{x)y the /x-measure of such a set is finite. Proof of Theorem. S u p p o s e that μ is quasi-invariant. Clearly if X is bounded, then μ{γ + X) is finite for all y. As for its measurability as a function of jy, this follows at once from μ{γ + Χ)=
Γ ·'
χ{χ-γ)άμ{χ),
(2)
-00
where χ is the characteristic function of X. Further, if F is a bounded set, then we can obviously find a bounded measurable set Ζ such that {y + X)CZ for all yeY; hence μ{y + X) ^ μ{Ζ) < oo for all yeY. N o w suppose that μ{Χ) > 0, μο{Χ) = Ο, and μ^{Υ) > 0. T h e n by the quasi-invariance of μ we have μ{y -\- X) > 0 for all y. T h e n 0 <
ί μ{y + X)dy=
ί
\Γ
χ{x-y)dμ{x)\dy x{x-y)dy
dμ{x\
γ
where Fubini*s theorem is applicable because our definition of quasiinvariance includes the assumption of σ-finiteness. But ί χ{χ -y)dy
= μο{Υη{χ
- Χ)) < μο{χ -Χ)
= 0
(4)
J γ
for every Λ:, since μQ{x — Χ) = μο{Χ) = 0. But then the right side of (3) vanishes, which is a contradiction. T h u s , we have shown that any bounded set^ of L e b e s g u e measure t T h e u s e of b o u n d e d sets a n d L e m m a 1 in o r d e r to avoid the c o n s i d e r a t i o n of
sets
h a v i n g (possibly) infinite / i - m e a s u r e a p p e a r s u n n e c e s s a r y , as F u b i n i ' s t h e o r e m for n o n n e g a t i v e f u n c t i o n s is v a l i d w i t h o u t a n y s u m m a b i l i t y r e s t r i c t i o n s .
354
MEASURES IN LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
zero has /x-measure zero. Since any set of L e b e s g u e measure zero can be written as a countable union of bounded sets of L e b e s g u e measure zero, then μ{Χ) = 0 for all sets X of L e b e s g u e measure zero. T o show the converse, suppose that μο{Χο) > 0 but μ{Χο) = 0. L e t {xj^} be an everywhere dense sequence of points in R^, and define Ζ as the union Z=
y^{x,
It is not hard to show+ that /Xo(/?n -
+ Xo).
(5)
Z) = /^o(^i) = 0· But
μ{Κ,) = μ{Ζ) + μ{Ζι) < μ{Ζι) + V μ{χ, + ^ο).
(6)
Since μ{Χο) = Ο and μ is quasi-invariant, then μ{χ^ + ^ο) = Ο for all k. Furthermore, as we saw above, / X o ( ^ i ) = 0 imphes μ{Ζι) = 0. Therefore μ{Rn) = 0. T h u s μ is either equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure or else vanishes identically. We have thus proven that the class of quasi-invariant measures in Rn coincides with the class of measures equivalent to L e b e s g u e measure. Therefore, all quasi-invariant measures in are equivalent to one another.
5.2.
Quasi-Invariant Measures in Linear Topological Spaces
Let us now consider measures in infinite-dimensional linear topologi cal spaces. T h e definition of a quasi-invariant measure can be carried over formally to this case, by calling a measure in a linear topological space quasi-invariant if parallel displacement takes sets of measure zero into sets of measure zero. However, this formal extension is un successful, owing to the fact that for the most important classes of infinite-dimensional spaces there are no nonzero measures which are quasi-invariant in the sense indicated. • t I n d e e d , i f μο{Χο) € >
0, a s e q u e n c e
>
0, then b y the t h e o r y of differentiation w e c a n
MnXo) Let ^
/ =
and /' be {Xi +
find,
any
fixed
cubes such that /
> (1"€)μο(Λ). lies in t h e interior o f / ' . C l e a r l y the
family
7*} o f c u b e s c o v e r s / i n t h e s e n s e o f V i t a l i , a n d s o b y V i t a l i ' s c o v e r i n g t h e o r e m
t h e r e e x i s t s a s e q u e n c e { / * } o f d i s j o i n t c u b e s f r o m JJf s u c h t h a t μο(Ι—Uj^.j/*) a n d i n a d d i t i o n t h e /jt c a n b e c h o s e n s o t h a t t h e y l i e i n €μο(Ι%
for
of c u b e s w h o s e d i a m e t e r s tend to zero a n d s u c h that
where Ζ
i s d e f i n e d b y ( 5 ) . S i n c e c i s a r b i t r a r y , μο(Ι — Ζ ) =
a n a r b i t r a r y c u b e , it f o l l o w s t h a t μο(Ηη — Ζ ) =
0.
=
B u t t h i s i m p l i e s t h a t μ^(Ι — Ζ ) Ο, a n d e i n c e /
0, < is
5.2
Quasi-Invariant M e a s u r e s
355
L e t us consider measures μ in the conjugate space Φ' of a countably normed space Φ. We shov^ that if the spaces Φη^ηά Φ^^ι are different for every n, where Φ = Π^^χ Φ^, then there exists no quasi-invariant measure in Φ'. Indeed, Φ' is the union of the subspaces Φ^ conjugate to the Φ^, Φ' υΓ=ι Φή, where Φ^ C Φ^ C .... Therefore
=
n-*Qo
as the Φ'η are Borel sets in Φ' for which /x is therefore defined (cf. the opening remarks in Section 2.2). Since by hypothesis μ{Φ') Φ Ο, there is an η such that μ(Φ^) Φ 0. Since Φ^ and Φ^^.^ are diflFerent from one another, then Φ^ and Φ' differ from each other. We decompose Φ' into cosets with respect to Φ^. E a c h of these cosets is obtained by a parallel displacement of Φ^, which has nonzero measure, and so by the quasiinvariance of μ these cosets have nonzero measures. Since the family of all these cosets has the power of the continuum, we arrive at a contra diction with the σ-finiteness of /x. T h i s assertion holds also for the conjugate space Φ' of any normed space having a countable everywhere dense set. I n particular, there exists no quasi-invariant measure in a Hilbert space (cf. Section 5.3). As in many similar cases, the difficulties which arise are successfully overcome by considering rigged Hilbert spaces. T h u s , let Φ€ HC Φ' be a rigged Hilbert space, i.e., a nuclear space Φ in which there is given a scalar product ( φ , φ) (as in Section 4 of Chapter I , Η denotes the completion of Φ in the norm || φ || = V ( φ , φ)). With each element φ βΦ we associate a functional Fy, on Φ, defined by {Fy,, φ) = ( φ , φ). W e obtain thereby an (antilinear) imbedding φ'-^Fy, of Φ into Φ'. It is obvious that the functionals of the form Fy,, φ βΦ, are everywhere dense in Φ'. We will say that a measure μ in Φ' is quasi-invariant, if μ{Εγ + X) =0 for every element φΕΦ and every set X such that μ{Χ) = 0. T h u s , we eliminate the requirement that every translation carries sets of measure zero into sets of measure zero, requiring that this be true only for translations by the elements Fy,, φβΦ, We remark that since the elements of the form Fy, are everywhere dense in Φ', then the translations by elements F are ^'sufficiently numerous.'* T h i s means that if Φ'ΙΨ^ = i? is a finite-dimensional factor space, then any translation in R can be induced by a translation in Φ' corresponding to some element Fy,, where φθΦ. T h i s assertion follows from the fact that the map of Φ into R is everywhere dense in R, which, in view of the finite dimensionality of R, means that it coincides with R,
356
MEASURES IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
We w i n prove that there exist quasi-invariant measures in the conjugate spaces of nuclear spaces (here, of course, quasi-invariance is understood in the sense j u s t indicated). T h a t is, we will show that if an imbedding of Φ into Φ' is defined by a continuous Hermitean functional Β{ψ, φ), then the Gaussian measure defined by this functional is quasi-invariant. In other words, we will prove the following theorem. T h e o r e m 3. L e t Β{φ, φ) be a nondegenerate positive-definite Hermitean functional, continuous in each argument, on a nuclear space Φ, and let μ be the Gaussian measure in Φ' defined by 5(
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ < .«"^"».
Proof.
(7)
By the definition of a Gaussian measure we have^ m(2)
- ( i r /
exp[-ifi^(/",i^)]
dj-
and μ{Ρ,, + Ζ ) = ^ ί (2π)" 1
where B\y{P^,
txpl-^B^P,Ρ)]
d^P
exp[-^B^{P-P^,P-P„)]d^P,
is the functional on φ ' / ψ « defined by ^ ( 9 5 , φ), and
* F o r b r e v i t y o f n o t a t i o n w e d e n o t e b y Ρ t h e c o s e t w i t h r e s p e c t t o Ψ" c o n t a i n i n g t h e e l e m e n t F e Φ', a n d hy Ρ,^ + A t h e p r o j e c t i o n i n t o ΦΊΨ'> o f t h e c y l i n d e r s e t Fy, A- Z.
5.2
Quasi-Invariant Measures
357
άψΡ is the L e b e s g u e measure in Φ'ΙΨ^ corresponding to the scalar product Βψ{Ρι,Ρ^, Therefore
= sup exp[B^(F,^^) - ^B^(P^,F^)]
< sup
cxp[B^{P,P^)]
F r o m the definition of the functional J5,p(J^i,/^a) (^f- Section 3.2) it follows that Β^{ί^,Ρ,)
= {Ρ,φ)
for any Ρ in Φ'/Ψ^^ where ( F , 0 ) denotes the value of the functional F for the element φ. Ii Ρ e Ay then by hypothesis one can choose F inP so t h a t | | F | U < Then \B^PyP^)\
<\{Ρ,φ)\
^\\Ρ\\_η\\φ\\η^Κ\\φ\\η.
Therefore /x(Z) which proves the lemma. Proof of the Theorem. L e t AT be a set of /x-measure zero, and let φ be any element in Φ . We have to show that the s e t F ^ + Xy the translate of X by the element Fy,, also has zero /x-measure. T o do this, it suffices to show that /x(Fy, + X) < € for any e > 0. T h u s , let € > 0. Since /x is countably additive and Φ ' is the union of balls < / ? , one can find η and R such that / χ ( Φ ' — S ) < J c , where S is the ball || F ||_^ < Ry and F^, e Φ ; . L e t X^ = X η S^y where 5 i is the ball \\F\\_^ < / ? + and X^ = X - X^. Obviously the set Fy, + X^ hes in the complement of S , and therefore μ{Fy, + X^) < i c . Let us show that also μ{Ρ^, + X^ < ^e. Indeed, since /χ(ΑΊ) = 0, it can be covered by a countable union U*^i of cylinder sets such that /x(Z,) <
e x p [ - ( Ä + II
lUJII φ
u
Since X^ C 5 , the cylinder sets Z^, 1 < Λ < oo, can be chosen so that their bases Aj, lie respectively in the projection of the ball in Φ ' / Ψ ^
358
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
{Ψ^ denotes the generating subspace of Zj.). We may suppose without loss of generality that φ eWj^ for all k. Since the Aj^ lie in the projection of the ball = {|| F\\_^ < / ? + || ||_ then by L e m m a 2 μ(Ρ^ + Ζ , ) < exp[(Ä + II F , II.Jll φ |U]^(Z,) and therefore
A;=l
< exp[(Ä +
|1_„)|| φ ||„]
μ(Ζ,) <
fc=l
T h u s ^{Fy, + Z i ) < J e . But this means that μ{Ρ^ + X) = μ{Ρ^ + Χ,) + M F , +
^2)
< e,
which proves the theorem. T h u s , Gaussian measures in the conjugate space Φ' of a nuclear space Φ are quasi-invariant. One can say that to every continuous positivedefinite nondegenerate Hermitean functional on Φ there corresponds a quasi-invariant measure. If Φ is infinite dimensional, then there exist infinitely many pairwise inequivalent quasi-invariant measures in Φ' (recall that in a finite-dimensional space all quasi-invariant measures are equivalent to one another). In fact, let β ι ( φ , φ) and Β2{φ\ φ) be positive-definite continuous nondegenerate Hermitean functionals on a nuclear space Φ, and let μ^ and ^ 2 be the Gaussian measures in Φ' defined by these functionals. A s s u m e that ^ 2 ( 9 » Φ) is bounded relative to the scalar product defined by Βι{φ,φ), i.e., that there exists Μ > 0 such that the inequahty \Β^{φ,ψ)\
<Μ|5ι(φ,φ)|
£2(9?,
holds for all ψ ΕΦ. T h e n φ) defines a positive-definite bounded linear operator A in the space Η (the completion of Φ relative to the norm || φ || = Λ/βι(φ, φ)) defined by Β,{Αφ,φ)
= Β2{ψ.φ).
(8)
T h e following assertion holds: If the operator A defined by ( 8 ^ has a discrete spectrum, and the series Σ^=ι consisting of the eigenvalues of A converges, then μ-^ and μ^ are inequivalent. T h e proof of this assertion is based upon L e m m a s 2 and 3 of Section 3. Namely, consider the ball S in Φ defined by 5 ι ( φ , ψ) < i ? ^ and denote the map of S in Φ' by 5 ' . It is easy to show, using L e m m a 3
5.3
Quasi-Invariant M e a s u r e s
359
of Section 3, that μι{3') = 0. At the s a m e time, if Σ^^ι λ^. converges, then using the estimates from L e m m a 2 of Section 3, one can show that for R sufficiently large /X2(5") Φ 0. T h i s shows that and μ2 are inequivalent.^ Using these statements, it is not difficult to construct an infinite set of pairwise inequivalent quasi-invariant measures in Φ'. T o do this, it suffices to consider an infinite sequence Βι{φ, φ), -82(93, ^ ) , ... of positive-definite Hermitean functionals on Φ such that the operator An, defined by Β^,{Α^φ, φ) = Βη^ι(ψ, ΦΙ has a discrete spectrum, and the series consisting of its eigenvalues converges. It would be very interesting to give a complete description of all quasi-invariant measures in nuclear spaces. 5.3. Quasi-Invariant Measures in Complete Metric Spaces
In the previous paragraph it was shown that under very general condi tions there exist no measures in the conjugate spaces of countably normed spaces which are quasi-invariant relative to all translations. We now prove a similar result for complete linear metric spaces. T h e o r e m 4. L e t yl be a complete metric linear space containing a countable everywhere dense set, and such that the absolutely convex hull of any compact set* Ζ in is nowhere dense in A, T h e n the only quasi-invariant (under all translations) measure on A is the identically zero measure. Proof. First we show that if there is no normalized quasi-invariant measure (i.e., a quasi-invariant measure such that μ{Λ) = 1), then the only quasi-invariant measure in A is identically zero. Indeed, let /Ll be a quasi-invariant measure in A, Since μ is σ-finite (recall that we are only considering such measures), A can be written at a countable union of disjoint sets A^, A^y ... having finite positive /x-measure. L e t f{x) be defined on A by f{x) = l|2^μ{Λf.) if χ e and set iX)=\
Αχ)αμ(χ).
" O n e c a n s h o w t h a t i f t h e p r o d u c t n*.i
(9)
Κ c o n v e r g e s , t h e n μι a n d μζ a r e e q u i v a l e n t .
I n t h i s c a s e A is t h e s u m o f t h e i d e n t i t y o p e r a t o r a n d a n u c l e a r o p e r a t o r . * B y the absolutely convex hull of a set X combinations
of the f o r m
OiXi
+
... +
we m e a n the set
OnXnt w h e r e x^eX,
LOLL + ... + ION I < 1.
c o n s i s t i n g o f all l i n e a r 1 <
Ä <
n,
and
360
MEASURES IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
Since ,,ίΑΛ — V ^ =_ Κ/1) —= V |)ΚΛ-) = Χ „iA\
2k
1,
A=l ^
k=l
then J/ is a normahzed measure in Λ, F r o m the quasi-invariance of μ it follows easily that ν is also quasi-invariant. But by hypothesis there is no quasi-invariant normalized measure on / I . Consequently μ{Λ) = 0 . T h u s , our problem has been reduced to proving that there are no normalized quasi-invariant measures in Λ. S u p p o s e that μ is a countably additive measure in Λ such that μ{Λ) = 1. We show that for any η there is a compact set in Λ such that μ{Χη) ^ 1 — Indeed, choose a countable everywhere dense set Λ:2, ... in yl and consider the closed balls 5^.^ with centers at Xj. and radii p~^. Since for any fixed p the balls S^j,, ^ 2 ^ , ... cover Λ (since the set {xj^} is everywhere dense), in view of the countable additivity of μ there is a number k{p) such that the measure of the set
is not less than 1 — (l/2^w). L e t = CQ^i Xnp'y we show that is the desired set. Indeed, it is obvious that μ{Λ-Χ„)^^μ{Λ-Χ„,)^%^
= ΐ,
X^
(10)
from which it follows that μ{Χη) ^ 1 — w"^. Further, for any p the set Xγ^ is covered by the finite set of balls 5ip, of radius p~^. Finally, is closed because each of the Sj^^ is closed and consequently Χγ^ρ, as the union of finitely many of the Sj^pj is closed. But in a complete metric space any closed set Ζ which can be covered by a finite number of balls of any preassigned radius is compact.^ Consequently X^^ is compact. Now let X = U^^i X^. F r o m the relation μ{Χη) ^ 1 — it follows that μ{Χ) = 1. But then the (nonclosed) hnear span Jt of X has measure 1.^ + Let us show that the set ^ does not coincide with the ^ T h e p r o o f o f t h i s a s s e r t i o n is c a r r i e d o u t i n t h e s a m e w a y a s t h e p r o o f o f t h e c o m p a c t ness of a closed b o u n d e d set in a
finite-dimensional
space, with the sole difference that
the coverings of Ζ by balls of arbitrarily small radius play the role of the partitions. ^ B y t h e l i n e a r s p a n A O f a s e t X w e m e a n t h e s e t c o n s i s t i n g o f a l l finite l i n e a r c o m b i n a tions
λγΧι
4-
...
-I-
KXfi
of elements of
X.
t W e r e m a r k t h a t t h e q u e s t i o n o f t h e m e a s u r a b i l i t y o r n o n m e a s u r a b i l i t y o f X is i n c o n s e q u e n t i a l to the proof, a n d c a n b e a v o i d e d in v a r i o u s w a y s , o f w h i c h p e r h a p s the s i m p l e s t is t o o b s e r v e t h a t in t h e v e r y l a s t s t e p o f t h e p r o o f X c a n b e r e p l a c e d b y
X.
5.3
Quasi-Invariant Measures
361
entire space Λ. T o do this, consider the compact sets = (J^^i Xj,, and let denote the absolutely convex hull of 7^. By the conditions of the theorem, the sets are nowhere dense in Λ, Therefore the sets kY^^ consisting of all elements of the form ky^ y e are also nowhere dense in Λ. Since a complete metric space cannot be written as a count able union of nowhere dense sets (cf. Chapter I, Section 1.1), the union Y =r- Uk=i Un^ikYn does not coincide with Λ, But X C y , since if xeJt, then χ = X-^x^ + ... + X^Xpy where x^eX^^j^^ and therefore X e P ^ , where η = maxi^^-^p n{j) and k > Σ ^ ^ ι | λ^· |. T h i s proves that the set Jty having measure 1, does not coincide with Λ. Now let y be any element in A which does not lie in Jt, Since is hnear, then Ä and j ; + ^ are disjoint. Since therefore y + ^ lies in the complement of Jt and μ{^ί) = 1, then μ{y + -^) = 0. It foUows that μ is not quasi-invariant. We now show that it follows from this theorem that there exist no quasi-invariant measures in infinite-dimensional complete normed spaces having countable everywhere dense sets. In fact, we have to show only that in such spaces the absolutely convex huU of any compact set is nowhere dense. L e t be a compact set in A^ and S{xQy r) the ball in Λ with radius r and center at XQ. Since X is compact, it can be covered by a finite number of balls S{xj.y ^ r ) , 1 < Ä < w, of radius ^r. Therefore its absolutely convex huU X lies in the absolutely convex hull S of the set S = U^^i S{xj^y i r ) . Any element y e S can be represented in the form y =
λ ι ( ^ ι + >ί)
+
... + λ„(Λ:^ +
y^l
where | | + ... + | | ^ 1 and || I K ^r, ζ = 1, w. But aU elements X^Xi + ·.· + K^n the subspace V spanned by x-^, jc^, and II Aiji + ... + Xnyn II < H\ λ ι I + ... + I λ , I) < i r . Therefore every element in S can be written in the form y = ν -\- Zy where ve V and || ;2r || < ^r. T o show that the closure of S does not contain the ball S{XQ, r), it suffices to find an element y^ 6 S ( 0 , r) which cannot be represented in the f o r m a l = ν — XQ + z, where ve V and || «s: || < ^r. But the existence of such an element follows directly from the finite dimensionality of V and the infinite dimensionality of AA By T h e o r e m 4 this imphes the + T h i s r e s u l t is u s u a l l y s t a t e d a s a t h e o r e m for t h e c a s e r =
1, f r o m w h i c h t h e r e s u l t
for a r b i t r a r y r > 0 is a trivial c o n s e q u e n c e . T h e s t a t e m e n t is t h e f o l l o w i n g . I f F is a c l o s e d s u b s p a c e o f a n o r m e d l i n e a r s p a c e Λ a n d Y ^ Λ, t h e n f o r a n y € > 0 t h e r e e x i s t s a n e l e m e n t xE
Λ s u c h t h a t || Λ; || =
F i s t h e l i n e a r s p a c e s p a n n e d b y JCQ,
1 a n d || Xn-
— x\\
>
1 — c for all
6 F. I n o u r
case
362
MEASURES IN
LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
nonexistence in Λ of quasi-invariant measures. In the same way one can prove the nonexistence of quasi-invariant measures in any complete countably normed space having a countable everywhere dense set.
5.4. Nuclear Lie Groups and Their Unitary Representations. The Commutation Relations of the Quantum Theory of Fields T h e quasi-invariant measures which we have constructed in Section 5 . 2 find applications in the theory of infinite-dimensional L i e groups. Let G be some (topological) group. We will call G a nuclear Lie group, if there exists a neighborhood of the unit element in G which is homeomorphic to a neighborhood of zero in a countably Hilbert nuclear space Φ. As a rule, nuclear L i e groups are considered for which Φ is a rigged Hilbert space, i.e., such that a scalar product {φ, φ) is defined in Φ. Every nuclear space Φ can be looked upon as a commutative nuclear L i e group. L e t us present a somewhat more comphcated example of a nuclear L i e group. S u p p o s e that Φ€ HC Φ' is a rigged Hilbert space. T h e elements of the group GQ will be all triples g = (φ, 0 ; α), where φ and φ are elements of Φ, and α is a complex number of unit modulus. We introduce a multiplication in GQ, setting glg2
=
{ψΐ> Φΐ\
=
{ψι
+
^ΐ){ψ2^
Φ2\ « 2 )
Ψ2> Φι +
^^^^
0 2 ; e^^'^i^yOociOL^)
((φ, φ) is the scalar product in Φ). T h i s group is connected with the commutation relations of the quan tum theory of fields. In quantum mechanics a system having one degree of freedom is studied by means of operators p and q which are connected by the commutation relation pq-qp=
1.
T h i s commutation relation is the commutation relation for the operators of the L i e group G whose elements are triples of numbers {x, y, cx), α 7^ 0, and multiphcation is defined by (Λ^Ι,
Jl,
αι)(Λ^2»
«2) =
(Xi
+ x^, yi +
3^2.
e^^avia^ag).
(12)
In the same way, the consideration of a system with η degrees of freedom leads to the system of commutation relations
5.4
Quasi-Invariant Measures
363
T h e s e are the commutation relations for the operators of the L i e group G whose elements have the form (jc, y, a ) , where χ and y are vectors in n-dimensional space, and multiphcation is defined by (12), the sole diflFerence being that instead of x^yi one has to take the scalar product (^2, >Ί)· Finally, the consideration of quantized fields (systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) leads to an infinite system of commutation relations of the form (13). It is natural to regard these relations as the commutation relations of the nuclear L i e group GQ. We will consider here unitary representations of the g r o u p s Φ and GQ. By a unitary representation of any group G we mean a continuous operator-valued function U{g) defined on G , whose values are unitary operators in a Hilbert space i), such that
for any two elements g^,g^^G. Κ unitary representation U{g) is called cyclic, if there exists a vector he\) such that the smallest closed s u b s p a c e in i) which contains all vectors U{g)h,ge G , coincides with ί). Without loss of generality, we may suppose that || A || = 1. T h e vector h is called a cyclic vector for the representation U{g), We begin by considering cyclic representations of the group Φ. In other words, we consider continuous operator-valued functions υ{φ), whose values are unitary operators in a Hilbert space I), and i7(
h\,
where h is some fixed cychc vector of the representation [/(φ), and ( , )i denotes the scalar product in i). T h i s functional is positive-definite. Indeed, for any elements
η
η
η
But
(^(φ, -
φ,)Η, h), = {υ*{φ,)υ(φ,)Η,
h)^
= ((/(φ,)Α, ί/(φ,)Α), ,
364
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
and therefore η
η
η
j=l
fc=l
η
i=l k=\ |2
>0
(II A 111 is the norm in i)). T h i s proves the positive definiteness of L{φ). It is further obvious that L ( 0 ) = (A, h)i = 1, and that in view of the continuity of the representation U{ψ),L{ψ) is continuous. Applying Bochner's theorem in nuclear spaces (cf. T h e o r e m 1 of Section 4 ) toL(
(14)
J u s t as in the spectral analysis of operators (cf. the appendix to Chapter I, Section 4 ) , one can prove that ^ can be realized as the space of functions / ( F ) , defined on Φ' and having square integrable moduli with respect to μ, in such a way that the operator which corresponds by this realization to the operator [/(φ) is the operator of multiplication by T h i s realization consists in associating with the vector Κ = %λ,υ{φ,)Η
(15)
k=\
in I) the function fm
= % λ,.^<^.^.)
(16)
on Φ'. It follows from ( 1 4 ) that this correspondence is isometric. Since A is a cychc vector, the vectors of the form ( 1 5 ) are everywhere dense in i), and therefore this correspondence can be extended to all vectors of i). Now the operator υ{φ) takes a vector of the form ( 1 5 ) into the vector k=\ to which corresponds the function
k=l
fc=l
5.4
Quasi-Invariant Measures
365
Consequently, on functions of the form (16) the operator corresponding to υ{φ) is the operator of multiphcation by e'^^^'^^K But it is easy to prove that these functions are everywhere dense in L^. Therefore the operator in corresponding to υ{φ) is the operator of multiplication by ^^<^·^>. T h u s we have proven the following theorem. T h e o r e m 5. L e t f/(
1{φ) ^ {υ{φ)Η, h) = j
άμ{Ρ),
(17)
T h e space I) can be realized as the space of functions f{F) on Φ' having square integrable moduh with respect to μ, in such a way that the operator corresponding by this realization to υ{φ) is the operator of multiplication by e^^^'^^K If one chooses a vector h^el) different from h (in general, will not be cychc), then to also there corresponds a positive-definite continuous functional Lι{φ), defined by
T h e functional Lι{φ)
is the Fourier transform of a positive measure
μι in Φ': Ιι{φ)
= j β^^^><Ρ^μι(Ε),
(18)
T h e measures μι and μ are connected by the relation άμ,(Ε)=\/{Ε)\^μ{Ε),
(19)
where f{F) is the function which corresponds by T h e o r e m 5 to the vector Ap Indeed, since to the operator υ{ψ) there corresponds the operator of multiphcation by ^^<^·^> in L^, and the correspondence between i) and is isometric, then 1,{φ)
= (ί/(φ)Α„Α,)ι =
|e^^^'^>|/(F)r^^K^).
Comparing this with (18), we conclude that (19) holds. It follows from (19) that if μ{Χ) = 0, then μι{Χ) = 0. If hi is also a cyclic vector, then the converse is true. T h u s the measures corresponding to diff^erent cyclic vectors in i) are equivalent to one another. Finally, we remark that given a normahzed measure μ in Φ', there
366
MEASURES IN
LINEAR
exists a unitary representation υ{φ) of the representation such that
TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
of Φ and a vector h in the space
(υ(φ)Η, h) = j €'^^^^^μ{Κ). Indeed, denote by the space of aU functions f{F) on Φ ' having square integrable moduli with respect to /x, and associate with each φ e Φ the operator ί7(φ) i n L ^ which takes any function f{F) into the function e^^^-'^^ f{F). Obviously υ{φ) is the desired representation. Let us consider unitary representations of Φ which are not cyclic. In this case there is a finite or countable set {/x„} of measures in Φ ' such that i) is the direct orthogonal s u m of the spaces L^^ and to the operator υ{φ) there corresponds in each of the Lj, the operator of multiphcation by ^ ^ ' < ^ · 9 ^ >. F r o m this it follows that I) can be realized as a direct integral of Hilbert spaces 1) =
ί
@H{F)d^(F)
J Φ'
in such a way that to the operator υ{ψ) there corresponds the operator of multiplication by ^^^^·*^^ We shall not carry out the details of the corresponding arguments. We now turn to unitary representations of the group GQ. Recall that this group consists of elements.of the form (
Φι\ <^ι){ψ2> Φ2'> 0C2) =
{ψι
+
^2,
Φι +
Φ2\ e^'^^^^^^a^^^),
(20)
Consider the set Φ ^ in GQ consisting of aU elements of the form (
then this set of elements forms a subgroup in GQ which is isomorphic to the group Φ . In the same way, the elements of the form (0, φ\ 1) form a subgroup in GQ which also is isomorphic to Φ . Finally, the elements of the form (0, 0; a ) form a subgroup A in GQ which is iso morphic to the multiplicative group Τ of complex numbers of modulus 1. Let U{g) be a unitary representation of the group GQ. Restricting i7(^) to the subgroup Φ^, we obtain a unitary representation ί7(φ) of the group Φ . In the same way, the restriction of U{g) to yields another unitary representation ν{φ) of Φ (we denote by ν{φ) the operator U{g)
5.4
Quasi-Invariant Measures
367
corresponding to g of the form (0, i/r; 1)). Finally, the restriction of i7(^) to the subgroup ^4 is a unitary representation W{oi) of the group Γ . Since any element g = {φ, Φ\ oc) in GQ can be v^ritten as a product ( 9 > , 0 ; a ) = (9>,O;l)(O,0;l)(O,O;c.)
of elements of the subgroups Φι, and A, then the operator corresponding to g can be written in the form U(g) =
(21)
U{g)
υ{φ)ν{φ)ΐν{<χ).
Therefore to define i7(^) it suffices to specify the representations υ{φ), ν{φ), and W{oc). For simphcity we restrict ourselves to the case where the representa tion W(OL) of Τ has the form lV{(x) = a , and the representation υ{φ) is cychc (the general case can easily be reduced to this case). We show that in this case a complete description of all representations of GQ reduces to the description of ah pairs ( ί / ( φ ) , ν{φ)) of representations of the group Φ, satisfying the commutation relations ν{φ)υ{φ) = 6^^'Ρ^^^υ{φ)ν{φ).
(22)
Indeed, let U(g) be a unitary representation of GQ. It follows from (20) that (0, Φ; 1)(φ, 0; 1) =
( φ , 0; 1)(0, φ; 1)(0, 0; .^i^.v-)).
(23)
Since we have assumed that W{(x) = a , the proof of (22) follows directly from (23). Conversely, if the unitary representations υ{φ) and ν{φ) satisfy the commutation relations (22), then, taking
U{g) = ocU{φ)V{φ) for g = ( φ , 0 ; α ) , we obtain a unitary representation of GQ, Indeed, if ^ 1 = (9i> 0 1 ; OIL) and g^ = {φ^, Φ2\ « 2 ) , then ^{gxmg2)
= OLΙOC,U{ψι)V{φι)U{ψ,)V{φ,) =^.^<^.^ι)α,α2^(φι)ί/(9>2)ϊ^('Αι)Ι^(Ά2)
= β^^^^^^ύαια^υ^ψι + φ2)ν{φι + φ^) = Uigig^). We now turn to the description of all pairs {υ{ψ), ν{φ)) of representa tions of the group Φ which satisfy the commutation relations (22).
368
MEASURES
IN
LINEAR
TOPOLOGICAL
SPACES
Ch.
IV
Since we are considering only the case in which υ{φ) is cychc, by T h e o r e m 5 there exists a normahzed measure μ in Φ' such that (υ(φ)Η, h) = j e'^^^^^ αμ{Ρ) for all φΕΦ (A is a fixed cyclic vector of the representation υ{φ)). T h e space I) of the representation can be realized as the space Lf, of functions f{F) on Φ' having square integrable moduli with respect to μ, and to the operator ί/(φ) there corresponds in the operator of multiphcation by e^^^'^^K We now prove that for this representation ί7(φ) the operators ν{φ) are given (in the space L^) by ν{φ)/{Ε) = α^{Ρ)/{Ε + Γ^),
(24)
where ay,{E) = I^(iA)/o(^)>/o(^) — 1> is the hnear functional on Φ defined by (E^, φ) = (φ, φ). Indeed, since the operator inL^ correspond ing to υ{φ) is that of multiphcation by any function of the form fin
= X λ,/<^'-.>.
(25)
can be written in the form f{F) = X
λ,[/(φ,)/ο(ί').
k=l
Consequently, in view of the commutation relations we have
V{Φ)m
= X
Χ,ν(φ)υ(φ,)/,{Ρ)
k=l
= X λ , exp[/(
-= X λ ,
exp[/(9„
φ)]υ(φ,)ν{φ)/,{Ε) Φ)] exp[z(F, 9 , ) ] ^ , ( F ) .
Since exp [ί(φ^, φ)] = exp [i(F^„ φ;^)], this relation can be
written in
the form K ( 0 ) / ( F ) = a^{F) X λ , exp[i(F + F , , ^ . ) ] = s ( F ) / ( F + F , ) .
5.4
Quasi-Invariant Measures
369
As the functions of the form (25) are everywhere dense in L^, the relation F(^)/(F) = a,(F)/(F + F , )
(26)
holds for all functions f{F) in Ll. T h e functions ay{F) satisfy the functional equation + F^^Y
a,^,,lF)^a^lF)a^lF
(27)
Indeed, in view of (26) = ηΦ^ + ΦΜΡ)
=
ν{Φ^)ν(Φ,)ΜΡ)
= V{φ,)a.niP) = %^iPK,{P
+ Pn)•
We have found the realizations of υ{φ) and ν(φ) in L^. L e t us now show that the measure /x, corresponding to the representation υ{φ), is quasi-invariant (in Φ'). T o do this, we note that from the unitarity of ν{φ) it follows that
(/,/)i = m)f, for every
feLl.
vm\
T h i s can be written as
' | / ( F ) | 2 d^{F) =
j
|/(F +
F.,,)r^|
a,(F)|2
d^{F).
Replacing the variable F by F + F ^ in the left side, we obtain ' | / ( F + FXάμ{Ρ
+ F , ) = J | / ( F + F^l
Since (28) holds for all functions
f{F)eLl,
a^{F)\^άμ{Ρ),
(28)
then
άμ^{Ρ) ^ άμ{Ρ + F,,) = I a,(F)|2 άμ{Ρ).
(29)
T h u s , under translation by the vector Fy, corresponding to the element i/f 6 Φ, the measure μ is taken into the measure μ^ defined by
/x,(X)= ί
\α^{Ρ)\^άμ{Ρ).
Obviously μ^^Χ) = 0 if μ{Χ) = 0. But this means that μ is quasiinvariant. We have thus proven the following theorem.
370
MEASURES IN
LINEAR TOPOLOGICAL SPACES
Ch.
IV
T h e o r e m 6. S u p p o s e that U{g) is a unitary representation of the group Go, in a Hilbert space / / , which induces a cyclic (unitary) re presentation of the subgroup of GQ consisting of all elements of the form ( φ , 0 ; 1 ) , and the representation W{(x) = α of the subgroup of GQ consisting of all elements of the form ( 0 , 0 ; cx). T h e n there exists a quasi-invariant measure (in the sense of the definition on p. 3 5 5 ) μ in Φ' such that (^/(φ)Α,
h) =
j
β'^^^^^μ(Ρ),
where ψ is an element of the subgroup Φ^, and A is a cyclic vector of the representation υ{φ). T h e Hilbert space Η can be realized as the space of functions on Φ' which have square integrable moduli with respect to μ, in such a way that υ{φ) is the operator of multiphcation by e^^^'^^^ and ν{φ) is given by ν{φ)/(Ρ)
= α^(Ρ)/{Ρ + Ρ^),
where the ay,{F) are functions on Φ' satisfying the functional equation
andFy, is the element of Φ' such that (F^, φ) = ( φ , φ). Under translation by the vector Fy, e Φ', the measure μ transforms according to μ^{Χ)=
ί
\α^{Ρ)\^μ{Ρ),