Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100 °C via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition

Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100 °C via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition

Accepted Manuscript Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100 °C via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition Yun-Shao...

1011KB Sizes 1 Downloads 27 Views

Accepted Manuscript Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100 °C via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition

Yun-Shao Cho, Chia-Hsun Hsu, Kuo-Yao Shen, Sam Zhang, Wan-Yu Wu, Shui-Yang Lien PII: DOI: Reference:

S0257-8972(18)31391-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.068 SCT 24136

To appear in:

Surface & Coatings Technology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

31 August 2018 12 November 2018 17 December 2018

Please cite this article as: Yun-Shao Cho, Chia-Hsun Hsu, Kuo-Yao Shen, Sam Zhang, Wan-Yu Wu, Shui-Yang Lien , Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100 °C via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition. Sct (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.068

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Mechanism of dense silicon dioxide films deposited under 100oC via inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition Yun-Shao Cho1, Chia-Hsun Hsu1, Kuo-Yao Shen2, Sam Zhang3, Wan-Yu Wu1, Shui-Yang Lien1*

2

PT

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan Department of Electrical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan Faculty of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, China

SC

3

RI

1

*Corresponding author’s email: [email protected]

NU

Abstract

MA

High density of the inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition (ICPCVD) enables

D

growth of films on soft substrate such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) that otherwise curls at

PT E

temperatures higher than 100°C. In this study, dense silicon oxide (SiOx) films are prepared on PET by ICPCVD. Intrusive optical emission spectroscopy is employed to monitor distribution of the

CE

plasma radicals during the deposition process. The study discovers a direct relationship between the

AC

dense structure of the deposited film and the CH/(CH+OH) plasma radical intensity ratio. The deposition plasma with the lowest CH radical ratio results in the SiOx film with the least CHx incorporation and densest film structure. The film exhibits the smallest etched area in hydrochloric acid etching tests and the minimal water-vapor transmission rate of about 1.5×10-1 g/m2/day. Keywords: optical emission spectroscopy, silicon oxide, polyethylene terephthalate, inductively coupled plasma, tetramethylsilane

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1. Introduction Transparent barrier coatings have recently gained great attention in industries for applications in electronic devices, especially in flexible organic light-emitting diodes. These coatings provide

PT

encapsulation against inward permeation of water and oxygen, both of which can oxidize the

RI

metallic cathode thus causing the device performances deteriorate [1]. Thin, glassy barrier coatings

SC

of silicon compounds such as silicon dioxide (SiO2) have been a favorite choice. SiO2 films deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) at 200-450°C have a satisfactory

NU

film density [2]. It has been reported that the addition of oxygen to tetramethylsilane (TMS) vapors

MA

during PECVD deposition leads to the change in film structure which varies from organic to

D

inorganic character close to SiO2 films [3]. However, this deposition temperature is still too high for

PT E

flexible substrate such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which can easily curl at temperatures higher than 100°C. Decreasing temperature to below 150°C leads to high porosity in PECVD SiO2

CE

[4], resulting in encapsulation failure. The challenge is to prepare SiO2 film with high density at low

AC

temperatures. The gas barrier property of a SiOx film synthesized on PET from PECVD using TMS-oxygen gas mixture has been reported to have water vapor transmission rates of 0.34-1.6 g/m2/day [5,6]. In addition, SiOx-based multilayers on plastic substrates have been reported to have WVTR lower than 10-5 g/m2/day [7,8]. One possible solution for reducing deposition temperature lies in the high plasma density CVD technique with low process pressures. Inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition (ICPCVD) is a good candidate as it has high plasma density of

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10-11-10-12 cm-3, nearly two orders of magnitude higher than what is possible in PECVD[9,10]. Although the properties of the SiO2 films prepared by ICPCVD have been studied, the plasma chemistry of the deposition process and its relationship with film properties are rarely reported.

PT

In this study, we prepare dense SiO2 films on PET via ICPCVD. During the deposition the

RI

plasma radical distribution is monitored with optical emission spectroscopy (OES), and the plasma

SC

radical distribution is analyzed and correlated to the structural property of the films deposited. A direct relationship is discovered between the radical density and the SiO2 film density, thus providing

NU

useful guide in encapsulation of flexible electronic devices.

MA

2. Experimental methods

D

The PET (50 µm, Nan Ya Plastics, Taiwan) squares of 10×10 cm2 in size were used as substrate,

PT E

which were ultrasonically cleaned in deionized water, ethanol and acetone for 15 min each, followed by drying under flowing nitrogen. The O2 and tetramethylsilane (TMS) gas mixture was input into

CE

the ICPCVD system at flow rates of 2 and 60 sccm, respectively. The deposition temperature was set

AC

to 90°C, at which no curling of PET was observable. The radiofrequency power was varied from 300 to 1800 W to change the plasma radical distribution. The thickness of the SiO2 film was measured as 300 nm by an alpha-step profilometer. During the deposition, the plasma spectrum was monitored by OES via an optical fiber head placed inside the deposition chamber beside the substrate. The chemical bond configuration in the films was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The surface morphology of the films was observed with an atomic force

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

microscope (AFM). The water-vapor transmission rate (WVTR) was measured using a Mocon Permatran-W 3/61 at 40°C and 100% relative humidity. The film stress was measured on a silicon substrate using a laser profilometer (FLX-2320, Tencor) by applying the Stone formula [11] E h2 (R −R2 )

s 1 σf t f = 6(1−V )R

(1)

1 R2

PT

s

RI

where σf is the in-plane stress component in the film, tf is the thickness of the film, Es is Young’s

SC

modulus of the substrate, Vs is Poisson’s ratio of the substrate, h denotes the thickness of the substrate, and R1 and R2 are the radii of curvature of the substrate before and after film deposition,

NU

respectively.

MA

3. Results and discussion

D

Figure 1 shows the proposed growth mechanism of the SiOx films deposited by ICPCVD with

collision can be written as

PT E

TMS and oxygen mixture. During plasma deposition, the decomposition of TMS by electron

(2)

CE

Si(CH3)4 + xe- →Si(CH3)4-x + xCH3 + xe-

AC

where x=1 to 4. CH3 can further be decomposed into CH2 and then CH by removing hydrogen atoms. The hydrogen atoms react with oxygen atoms, from dissociation of oxygen molecules, and forms OH radicals. It is reported that reactions between OH plasma radicals and methyl groups may cause carbon removal by eventually forming CO, CO2 or CH4 gas [12–14]. Once carbon is removed from methyl groups of TMS, OH radicals have more possibility to bond with silicon to form (OH)xSi(CH3)4-x, which has been reported to be as one of the most important intermediates for the

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

SiOx films synthesized from TMS/O2 mixture [15]. Therefore, in this study OH radicals is considered to be favorable for silicon oxide growth as they can form Si-O bonds after reacting with decomposed TMS, as given by (3) (4)

RI

OH-Si(CH3)4-x + OH-Si(CH3)4-x → (CH3)4-x-Si-O-Si-(CH3)4-x + H2

PT

OH + Si(CH3)4-x → OH-Si(CH3)4-x

SC

The OH can also react with the methyl parts of TMS, where CH4 is released and a Si-O bond is generated as given by

NU

OH + Si-CH3 → Si-O + CH4

(5)

MA

In contrast, in eq. (5) if the TMS reacts with a CHn (n=1-3) radical instead of the OH radical, the

(6)

PT E

CHn + Si-CH3 → Si-CHn-1 + CH4

D

equation becomes

Therefore, it is assumed that the film structure would have large fraction of Si-O-Si bonds and come

CE

closer to ideal SiO2 when the plasma has large amount of OH radicals. Whereas the film deposited at

AC

significant amount of CHn radicals would have Si-CHn-1 bonds. The incorporation of Si-CHn-1 bonds in Si-O-Si network deforms film structure and increases the porosity of the deposited films [16,17]. Figure 2a shows the OES spectra in the wavelength range of 200-800 nm for the SiOx films deposited at different powers. All the peaks are very weak at 300 W, indicating that electrons in the plasma do not have sufficient energy to dissociate much of TMS molecules. As the power increases, more TMS is decomposed and several main peaks present, which are OH (A2Σ+→X2Π) at 309 nm

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [18], CH (A2Δ→X2Π) at 431 nm [19], Hβ (4d→2d) at 486 nm, Hα (3d→2p) at 656 nm [20] and O (3p5P→3s5S0) at 777 nm [18]. There should be a peak at 252 nm associated with Si atomic radicals [21] dissociated from TMS, but this peak is almost unobservable because of its relatively weak

PT

intensity. CH3 and CH2 radicals cannot be observable in OES spectra, but their amounts can be

RI

positively related to CH peak intensity. As in the proposed film growth mechanism, in which OH and

SC

CH radicals affect the film structure, further analysis of the OES spectra is carried out by taking into account the OH and CH plasma radical intensity. An CH radical relative intensity ratio is defined as

NU

CH/(OH+CH) (“CH relative ratio” for short) and is plotted in Fig. 2b together with that of the OH

MA

and the CH. Below 1200 W, generation of OH radicals accelerates with increasing power while the

D

increase of CH radicals seems stagnant. From 1200 to 1800 W, generation of CH increases abruptly

PT E

at a much higher rate. The generation of CH radicals requires continuous electron collisions with CH3. As the power increases, the electron density increases, which increases the probability of

CE

collisions. The CH radical intensity has thus a sharp increase after 1200 W. Overall, the CH ratio

AC

reaches its minimum at the power of 1200 W. This predicts that the film deposited at 1200 W might have the least fraction of Si-C bonds and the highest fraction of Si-O-Si bonds. Figure 3a shows FTIR results for films prepared at different powers. The peak at about 447, 795, and 1058 cm-1 emerge from the Si-O-Si rocking, bending and stretching modes [22,23]. The peak at 1246 cm-1 corresponds to the Si-CH3 bonds [24], where the hydrogen-terminated structure can form voids and thus decrease film density. The peak intensity of Si-O-Si (filled square) and Si-CH3 (open

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

square) for the films deposited at different powers are shown in Fig. 3b. At 300 W, the Si-O-Si peak intensity is low due to the low amount of the OH radicals. The high Si-CH3 bond intensity results from the non-reacted Si-CH3 parts in TMS. As the power increases, the increase of Si-O-Si peak

PT

intensity and the decreases of Si-CH3 peak intensity are due to the enhancement of eq. (4) and (5).

RI

However, the Si-CH3 peak intensity increases again when the power is larger than 1200 W. The

SC

significant amount of the CH radicals promotes eq. (6). This mitigates the generation of Si-O bonds and increases Si-C bonds. The ratio R of Si-C to Si-O-Si peak intensity is calculated for the different

NU

powers. The 1200 W has the lowest peak ratio of 0.97. As mentioned before that the

MA

hydrogen-terminated structure of Si-CH3 can represent as voids in the films, the film deposited at

D

1200 W could be expected to have the least voids and thus the best density. Based on the correlation

PT E

between OES and FTIR results, optimization of the density of silicon oxide deposited using TMS and O2 gas mixture could be done at the stage of plasma deposition by control the ratio of CH

CE

relative ratio.

AC

Figure 4 shows the AFM topographical images of the SiOx films deposited at different power. The corresponded average surface roughness (Ra) values are shown in Fig. 5. Ra decreases from 1.3 to 0.9 nm when the power increases from 300 to 1200 W, and then increases rapidly from 0.9 to 1.8 nm when the power further increases from 1200 to 1800 W. As compared to the case at 1200 W, the increased Ra at low power level and high power level. In FTIR it shows that both low and high power levels lead to a high content of Si-CH3 bonds in the deposited films. These

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

hydrogen-terminated bonds in the film interrupt the network connectivity. Voids or grain boundary could be formed and surrounded by several terminated bonds [25]. The films with voids and grain boundaries become less dense and have non-smooth (rough) surface [26,27]. The film deposited at

PT

1200 W having the lowest Ra value indicates the densest structure.

RI

Figure 6 shows the residual stress and WVTR measurement results for the SiO2 films deposited

SC

at different power. The negative sign of the residual stress value indicates compress. It is reported that silicon oxide films are more compressive with increased film density [28]. Whereas the Si-CH3

NU

bonds can induce tensile stress, which reduces the compressive stress of SiOx films. Therefore, the

MA

SiOx film deposited at 1200 W has the most compressive stress due to the least Si-CH3 proportion.

D

For the WVTR values of the films, the lowest value of 1.51×10-1 g/cm2/day can be obtained at 1200

PT E

W. As water vapor penetrates the film mainly through pores or grain boundary, this measurement thus supports our earlier analysis that the film is the densest at deposition power of 1200W.

CE

The film density is also confirmed by performing wet etching at 55°C for 60 min on 50 nm

AC

aluminum (Al) films covered with the 300 nm SiO2 films. The etchant consists of HCl, H2O2 and HO2 with a ratio of 3:1:1. The SiO2 layers serves as barrier layers to protect the Al layer underneath from the etching process. The morphological images for the films after wet etching are shown in Fig. 7. The Al-etched area is presented as the black region, and its ratio is calculated using ImagePro computing software, as shown in Fig. 8. The minimal ∆A is 1.4% occurring at the power of 1200 W, and the least etched area confirms the densest structure.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

4. Conclusion This paper demonstrates the dense SiO2 films deposited by ICPCVD with instructive OES system. The OH and CH radicals are assumed to be important radicals determining the density of the

PT

films. The ratio of CH to (OH+CH) is the lowest at the power of 1200 W. The FTIR result confirms

RI

that OH plasma radical is responsible for generation of Si-O-Si bonds, while the CH radical will

SC

produce Si-C bonds in the deposited films. The power of 1200 W yields the highest Si-O-Si bond intensity ratio, indicating the densest film structure. The film deposited at the power of 1200 W also

NU

shows the lowest surface roughness of 0.9 nm, the most compressive residual stress of -354 Mpa,

MA

and the lowest WVTR of 1.51×10-1 g/m2/day. The OES data are in good agreement with the

D

measurement results of the film properties. Therefore, this paper demonstrates the feasibility of the

PT E

OES in-situ monitoring for the deposition of dense SiO2 films. Acknowledgments

CE

This work is sponsored by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under

References [1]

AC

contract nos. 104-2632-E-212-002-, 104-2622-E-212-005-CC3, 104-2221-E-212-002-MY3.

M.Schaer, F.Nüesch, D.Berner, W.Leo, L.Zuppiroli, B.M.Schaer, Water Vapor and Oxygen Degradation Mechanisms in Organic Light Emitting Diodes, Adv. Funct. Mater. 11 (2001) 116–121. doi:10.1002/1616-3028(200104)11:2<116::AID-ADFM116>3.0.CO;2-B.

[2]

J.G.Lee, H.S.Kim, K.S.Seo, C.H.Cho, H.Y.Cha, High quality PECVD SiO2process for

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

recessed MOS-gate of AlGaN/GaN-on-Si field-effect

transistors,

Solid.

metal-oxide-semiconductor heterostructure

State.

Electron.

122

(2016)

32–36.

doi:10.1016/j.sse.2016.04.016. M.Kihel, S.Sahli, A.Zenasni, P.Raynaud, Y.Segui, Dielectric properties of SiOx like films

PT

[3]

RI

deposited from TMS/O2 mixture in low pressure microwave plasma, Vaccum. 107 (2014)

M.Baklanov, L.Vasilyeva, T.Gavrilova, Porous structure of SiO 2 films synthesized at low temperature

and

pressure,

Thin

Solid

NU

[4]

SC

264–268. doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.02.022.

Films.

171

(1989)

43–52.

H.W.Liu, T.H.Chen, C.H.Chang, S.K.Lu, Y.C.Lin, D.S.Liu, Impact on the Gas Barrier

D

[5]

MA

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0040609089900321.

PT E

Property of Silicon Oxide Films Prepared by Tetramethylsilane-Based PECVD Incorporating with Ammonia, Appl. Sci. 7 (2017) 56. doi:10.3390/app7010056. C.Y.Wu, R.M.Liao, L.W.Lai, M.S.Jeng, D.S.Liu, Organosilicon/silicon oxide gas barrier

CE

[6]

AC

structure encapsulated flexible plastic substrate by using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition, Surf. Coat. Technol. 206 (2012) 4685–4691. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.080. [7]

J.H.Zhang, Y.-S.Wang, J.H.Liang, D.S.Wuu, Effect of the polymer overcoat on the performance of the SiNx/SiOx multilayer barrier for OLED gas barrier applications, in: 2015 Int. Symp. Next-Generation Electron. Taipei, Taiwan, 2015.

[8]

K.L.Han, K.C.Ok, H.S.Cho, S.Oh, J.S.Park, Effect of hydrogen on the device performance

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

and stability characteristics of amorphous InGaZnO thin-film transistors with a SiO2/SiNx/SiO2 buffer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 (2017) 063502. doi:10.1063/1.4997926. [9]

S.Ki Kim, S.IlCho, Y.Jin Choi, K.Sik Cho, S..Pietruszko, J.Jang, Coplanar amorphous silicon

PT

thin film transistor fabricated by inductively-coupled plasma CVD, Thin Solid Films. 337

T.H.Kim, K.N.Kim, A.K.Mishra, J.S.Seo, H.B.Jeong, J.O.Bae, G.Y.Yeom, Plasma

SC

[10]

RI

(1999) 200–202. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01380-7.

Characteristics of Inductively Coupled Plasma Using Dual-Frequency Antennas, 52 (2013) 1–

G.G.Stoney, The Tension of Metallic Films Deposited by Electrolysis, Proc. R. Soc. A Math.

MA

[11]

NU

5.

X.Guo, H.Liu, B.Wang, Q.Wang, R.Zhang, Insight into C + O(OH) reaction for carbon

PT E

[12]

D

Phys. Eng. Sci. 82 (1909) 172–175. doi:10.1098/rspa.1909.0021.

elimination on different types of CoNi(111) surfaces: a DFT study, RSC Adv. 5 (2015)

D.W.Blaylock,

T.Ogura,

W.H.Green,

G.J.O.Beran,

Computational

Investigation

of

AC

[13]

CE

19970–19982. doi:10.1039/C4RA15555F.

Thermochemistry and Kinetics of Steam Methane Reforming on Ni (111) under Realistic Conditions, J. Phys. Chem. C. 113 (2009) 4898–4908. [14]

J.Shoeb, M.M.Wang, M.J.Kushner, Damage by radicals and photons during plasma cleaning of porous low-k SiOCH. I. Ar/O2 and He/H2 plasmas, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 30 (2012) 041303.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

[15]

Á.Yanguas-Gil,

Á.Barranco,

J.Cotrino,

P.Gröning,

A.R.Gonzalez-Elipe,

Plasma

characterization of oxygen-tetramethylsilane mixtures for the plasma-enhanced CVD of SiOxCyHz thin films, Chem. Vap. Depos. 12 (2006) 728–735. doi:10.1002/cvde.200606496. E.Gil, J.B.Park, J.S.Oh, G.Y.Yeom, Characteristics of SiOx thin films deposited by

PT

[16]

RI

atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition as a function of HMDS/O2 flow rate, Thin

[17]

SC

Solid Films. 518 (2010) 6403–6407. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.170.

S.E.Alexandrov, N.McSporran, M.L.Hitchman, Remote AP-PECVD of silicon dioxide films

NU

from hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO), Chem. Vap. Depos. 11 (2005) 481–490.

M. Zhang, Maskless Surface Modification of Polyurethane Films by an Atmospheric Pressure

D

[18]

MA

doi:10.1002/cvde.200506385.

PT E

He/O2 Plasma Microjet for Gelatin Immobilization, Micromachines. 9 (2018) 195. doi:10.3390/mi9040195. doi:10.3390/mi9040195. C.Alves Junior, N.K.M.Galvão, A.Gregory, G.Henrion, T.Belmonte, OES during reforming of

CE

[19]

AC

methane by microwave plasma at atmospheric pressure, J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 24 (2009) 1459. doi:10.1039/b905323a. [20] H.C.Barshilia, B.R.Mehta, V.D.Vankar, Optical emission spectroscopy during the bias-enhanced nucleation of diamond microcrystals by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition process, (1996). [21]

F.J.Kampas, Reactions of atomic hydrogen in the deposition of hydrogenated amorphous

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

silicon by glow discharge and reactive sputtering, J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) 6408–6412. doi:10.1063/1.331513. [22]

W.S.Liao, S.C.Lee, Water-induced room-temperature oxidation of Si-H and -Si-Si- bonds in

W.Liao, C.Lin, S.Lee, Oxidation of silicon nitride prepared by plasma‐enhanced chemical

RI

[23]

PT

silicon oxide, J. Appl. Phys. 80 (1996) 1171–1176. doi:10.1063/1.362915.

SC

vapor deposition at low temperature, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) 2229–2231. doi:10.1063/1.112772.

C.-C.Chiang, M.-C.Chen, L.-J.Li, Z.-C.Wu, S.-M.Jang, M.-S.Liang, Physical and Barrier of

Amorphous

Silicon-Oxycarbide

Deposited

by

PECVD

from

MA

Properties

NU

[24]

S.Kageyama, M.Akagawa, H.Fujiwara, Dielectric function of a-Si:H based on local network

PT E

[25]

D

Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (2004) G612. doi:10.1149/1.1778169.

structures, Phys. Rev. B. 83 (2011) 195205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.83.195205. J.D.Torre,

G.H.Gilmer,

D.L.Windt,

R.Kalyanaraman,

F.H.Baumann,

P.L.O’Sullivan,

CE

[26]

AC

J.Sapjeta, T.Dıá z de la Rubia, M.Djafari Rouhani, Microstructure of thin tantalum films sputtered onto inclined substrates : Experiments and atomistic simulations, J. Appl. Phys. 94 (2003) 263–272. doi:10.1063/1.1579112. [27]

Y.S.Lee, J.H.Han, J.S.Park, J.Park, Low temperature SiOx thin film deposited by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition for thin film encapsulation applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 35 (2017) 041508. doi:10.1116/1.4985140.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T.N.Chen, D.S.Wuu, C.C.Wu, C.C.Chiang, Y.P.Chen, R.H.Horng, High-Performance Transparent Barrier Films of SiO[sub x]∕SiN[sub x] Stacks on Flexible Polymer Substrates, J.

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Electrochem. Soc. 153 (2006) F244. doi:10.1149/1.2335592.

AC

[28]

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Figure captions Fig. 1: Growth mechanism of SiOx films deposited with TMS and oxygen mixture. Fig. 2: (a) Optical emission spectra, and (b) OH*, CH* radical intensities, and CH* radical

PT

intensity ratio for SiO2 films prepared at different powers.

RI

Fig. 3: (a) Fourier transform infrared spectra for SiO2 films deposited with different powers. (b)

SC

Si-O-Si (filled symbol) and Si-CH3 (open symbol) peak intensity with different power. R is the ratio of Si-O-Si intensity to Si-CH3 intensity.

NU

Fig. 4: Atomic force microscope images of SiOx films deposited with different powers (a) 300, (b)

MA

600, (c) 900, (d) 1200, (e) 1500 and (f) 1800 W.

D

Fig. 5: Surface roughness of SiOx films deposited with different powers. Error bar indicates

PT E

standard deviation for five samples in each case. Fig. 6: Residual stress and water vapor transmission rate for SiO2 films with different powers. Error

CE

bar indicates standard deviation for five samples in each case.

AC

Fig. 7: Optical microscope images for wet etching tests for different powers (a) 300, (b) 600, (c) 900, (d) 1200, (e) 1500 and (f) 1800 W. Fig. 8: Aluminum-etched area ratio for the wet etching tests. Error bar indicates standard deviation for five samples in each case.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT CH3 Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si

CH3 O

CH3

OH+Si-CH3→Si-O+CH4

Si

CH3 O

CH3

Si CH3

CHn+Si-CH3→Si-CHn-1+CH4 Carbon incorporation

Si

O

Si

O

O

O

O

Si

Si

O

O

O

Si O

O

Si

O

Figure 1

PT

Si

CH3

NU

O

O

Si

MA

O

O

D

O

O

Si

O

PT E

Si

O

CE

O

Si

O

O

CHn-1

O

O

Si

O

RI

O

O

AC

Si

O

O

SC

O

Si O

O

O

Si

Si O

1800 W

400

500

600

RI

300

700

800

SC

200

PT

1500 W 1200 W 900 W 600 W 300 W

O (777)

Hβ (486)

CH (431)

Intensity (a. u.)

OH (309)

(a)

Hα (656)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

MA

OH*(309 nm)

60

CH*(431 nm)

2000

CH/(CH+OH)

D

1500 1000

CE

500

30

15

0

AC

300

600

45

900

1200

Power (W)

Figure 2

1500

0 1800

CH*/(OH*+CH*) (%)

(b)

PT E

Intensity (a. u.)

2500

NU

Wavelength (nm)

(

Si-O-Si

(

Si-O-Si

Si-O-Si

Peak intensity (a. u.)

Si-CH3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1800 W 1500 W

PT

1200 W 900 W

RI

600 W

1400

1200

SC

300 W

1000

800

600

400

NU

Wavenumber (cm-1) 50

MA

30 20

5 0 4

CE

3

300

R=0.11

D

R=0.14 R=0.12.

6 10

R=0.09

R=0.13

R=0.18

600

900 1200 1500 1800 2100

600

900 1200 1500 1800 2100

PT E

Intensity (a. u.)

40

Si-O-Si Si-CH3

2

AC

0

300

Power (W)

Figure 3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

0.4

(μm)

0.2

0.6 0.4 0.2 (μm)

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

(µm)

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

(μm)

(nm) 0.6

(μm)

0.4

0.2

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 (μm)

D

MA

Figure 4

1.0

0 0.8 0.6

RI

(μm)

0.8

NU

0.2

0.8

0.8

(μm)

SC

(nm) 0.2

0.6

1.0 0

0

(f)

PT E

(μm)

0.4

0.4

CE

0.6

AC

(nm)

0.6

1.0

(e)

1.0 0.8

0.8

(μm)

(d)

0

0

(nm)

1.0

PT

0.6

0.8

(nm)

(nm)

1.0 0 0.8

(c)

(b)

(a)

(μm)

0.4

0.2

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

(μm)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2

1.4

PT

1.1

RI

0.8 0.5 300

600

900

SC

Roughness (nm)

1.7

1200

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

Power (W)

Figure 5

1500

1800

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Residual stress WVTR

6

4

4 2

PT

2

0 600

900

1200

1500

SC

300

NU

Power (W)

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

Figure 6

0 1800

WVTR (10-1 g/m2/day)

8

RI

Residual stress (-102 MPa)

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(a)

(b)

(c)

Etched area

100 μm (e)

100 μm (f)

100 μm

NU

SC

100 μm

RI

PT

(d)

100 μm

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

Figure 7

100 μm

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

25

15

PT

10

RI

5

0 300

600

900

SC

Etched area (%)

20

1200

AC

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

Power (W)

Figure 8

1500

1800

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights

CE

PT E

D

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

Dense ICPCVD SiOx layer is deposited on PET under 100°C. Optimization of film density can be achieved by monitoring plasma radicals. Intensity ratio of CH/(CH+OH) plasma radical is correlated to SiOx film density. Lowest CH radical ratio leads to the densest SiOx and the least carbon in films. The densest film with a WVTR of 1.5×10-1 g/m2/day is obtained.

AC

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.