Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

CHAPTER 1

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity 1.1 Introduction In any biological system, the metabolome indicates a complete set of metabolites [1]. The concept has come from structural biology, which strives to generate the necessary knowledge about the various inter/intra-molecular interactions providing a molecular basis for the macroscopic properties of these systems [2] in many features of molecular mechanisms, i.e., genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites. It is currently challenging, even for models like Arabidopsis thaliana with complete and extensively annotated genomes, to measure the entire metabolome of any simplest biological system. Specifically, the metabolite content in particular animals has not been specifically determined, but the genome size varies between 5000 and 25,000 in yeast, humans, and plants [3–5]. In the meantime, a large range of analytical strategies for enhancing the evaluation of plant metabolites have been framed. They were typically described in metabolomics verbally, which is inefficient when defining experimental methods such as metabolite profiling, metabolism, metabolic fingerprinting, metabolite footage, etc. [6]. Signals associated with a substrate or medium growth of an organism are examined by metabolite foot-printing through the examination of the substrate of the chemical [7, 8]. Experiments in metabolite profiling for more effective metabolite analysis have been carried out for many decades [9]. Before the highperformance strategies used for metabolite analysis and DNA/RNA characterization were developed, other techniques like nucleic acid microarrays and mass spectrometry were employed. Although metabolomics showed far fewer dependencies than other substances such as nuclear acids or proteins from any technological intervention due to a vibrant chemical property of metabolites, DNA, and RNA, protein associated with it. In addition to the use of NMR, IR spectroscopy and MS techniques [10–12] were advanced in metabolomics. This is all possible for a broad spectrum of Sustainable Agriculture: Advances in Plant Metabolome and Microbiome https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817109-7.00001-8

© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1

2

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

metabolites, which show both benefits and disadvantages in terms of the kind of information provided, susceptibility, and interferences. The metabolome analysis challenges and perspectives of different plant species will be detailed in the following section [6].

1.2 Metabolome studies: Challenges and perspectives Metabolomics is the latest omic technique involving a full analysis of small organism or a biological sample metabolite. Metabolomics generally stimulates a perception regarding the cell condition vis-a`-vis the health condition of an organism. It specifies an exclusive prospect to study the effect of genetic variations, disease, treatment, or diet on organisms’ endogenous metabolism [13]. Many fields could benefit from metabolomic research, and biomarker discovery is one of the most popular objectives of metabolomic studies. Researchers face challenges such as technical limitations, bioinformatics problems, and integration with other omic sciences in the field of analysis of metabolome. The problem of analysis of data, which is likely to be the most time-consuming stage of metabolomics workflows and requires close collaboration between analysts, clinicians, and experts on chemometrics, is one of the great challenges for metabolomics studies. The application in clinical practice of metabolomics depends on the development of standardized protocols of analytical performance and data analyzes with respect to the validation of biomarkers [14]. The organism’s final response to environmental factors can include metabolite levels, genetic modifications, changes in intestinal micro flora, and changes in enzyme kinetic activity [15]. Many examples of a successful metabolomics study within existing analytical limitations and capability include an assessment of significant equality for genetically modified plant (GMO) safety assessment [16]. The genetic knockouts of plant axis [17], circadian clock functions, natural product biosynthesis [18], biological phytofoam [19, 20], and so forth are recognized for metabolomics in genome annotation [21]. The metabolite profiling of phyto-medicinal species has proved a valuable instrument for quality control and efficiency optimization. The unexpected bioactive compounds in interactions between plant herbivores, endophyte molecular signatures, and from fungal infections were detected. Metabolite fingerprints are also used in herbal breeding programs to determine compounds associated with certain quality features [22]. Wherever transcriptomics and proteomics do not exist, metabolomics may be effective for analysis of species with a sequenced genome that strengthens the case for species analysis

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

3

through metabolomics [23]. The three major approaches used in the field of metabolism are metabolic fingerprinting, metabolite profiling, and targeted metabolism: (i) Metabolite fingerprinting is a worldwide, rapid, and ready analysis of any biological sample’s replicable metabolite fingerprint where the identification of metabolites is not necessary and represents many distinct classes of potential compounds. Neither preparation nor ultimate chromatographic resolution techniques are required for metabolic fingerprinting. Instead, it uses techniques that provide less complex and replicable information. Metabolic fingerprints are mainly used to classify a sample (qualitative analysis). The objective is to distinguish specimens from biologically different levels, e.g., disease/health, from a single pattern that characterizes a metabolic state in a given tissue or biological fluid [24]. (ii) Metabolite profiling is also an unspecified method for analyzing various amino acids, sugars, lipids, bile acids, etc. By comparison, the goal of metabolite profiling is to identify and quantify as many compounds as possible by means of metabolite high performance measurements involving chromatographically highly resolved separation and MS detection. This approach allows changes to unforeseen metabolome to be detected and can be addressed in particular metabolic ways. This technique thus leads to new scientific hypotheses being articulated and new metabolic biomarkers being identified [25, 26]. (iii) Targeted metabolism focus on the monitoring, usually for definite identification and exact quantification of one or more predefined metabolites. The compounds are a priori selected based on known metabolic trajectories or biomarkers and are associated with an organism’s specific reaction. For targeted metabolomics, analysis techniques, including the preparation of samples and clear methods for detection, are designed to provide maximum sensitivity and selectivity to achieve low detection and metabolite quantitative limitations [27, 28].

1.3 Analytical challenges in plant metabolomics Cells, fabrics, or their exudates may be focused on metabolomic research. The core objective of metabolomics could be defined as the unique features of the metabolome of the organisms [29]. The current practical impossibility of comprehensive metabolomics starts to be appreciated when looking at the methodical trials convoluted in metabolite analysis and in divergence to

4

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

genome sequence, i.e., the chemical diversity of a characteristic microbial metabolite concentrate [30], the spatial distribution including specific organ, cellular, subcellular domain, extra cellular, and occasionally external environments as well [31], and temporary distribution [32]. In contrast to proteomics and transcriptional studies, genomic information cannot be used as a constraint in identifying molecular species. Although the aim of all the work of documentation, quantification, and localization of each metabolite is not to be concise, there are many challenges for metabolome analysis. Genetic information cannot be used as a restriction for the identification of molecular species as opposed to proteomics and transcription studies. Although the ultimate objective of documenting, quantifying, and finding each metabolite is not to be crisp, but the analysis of the metabolism presents many challenges [33]. However, cellular homogenization followed by further extraction should be used in metabolomic studies for the removal of various substances from cells to be accepted for analysis, preferably ensuing the steps outlined as (a) metabolism should be quenched and (b) the metabolite’s chemical identity should be sustained and reproductive, and preferably complete metabolite solubilization should be done. Some external factors, as well as the extremes of temperature or pH, influence metabolome analyses, causing a significant degradation in numerous metabolites. Freezing assists in the stabilization of volatile substances; however, tissue expurgation with freezing of the tissues must be carried out quickly in order to avoid injury responses. Quick freeze methods include many options such as liquid N, isopentane liquid nitrogen [32, 33], and freeze clamping [34]. Freeze drying may contribute to the stability of frozen samples, but the loss of volatile metabolites can result in the reabsorption of airborne water by the lyophilized sample and the recovery of certain enzyme activity. One strategy is to remove metabolites from enzymes and cellular debris by extracting polar organic solvents like ethyl alcohol and acetonitrile from these freeze samples at very low temperatures (
72°C). Preliminary extractions remove water efficiently from enzymes so that the extraction temperature (4°C) can be improved in subsequent rounds, because extraction is highly inefficient at low temperatures and requires multiple repetitions [35]. Several studies have shown that a ratio of 9:1 methanol:water followed by an isopropanol water mixture is considered to be the best solvent mixture for effective extraction. Other studies examined the various LC-MS and GC-MS extraction protocols and NMR analysis for multiple extraction [36–38]. Fig. 1.1 shows the diagrammatic interpretation of the process of high-throughput metabolome analysis.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

5

Fig. 1.1 Graphic illustration of high throughput data analysis process for metabolome analysis.

Although each technique has its own limitations in terms of detection, sensitivity, dynamic range, and estimation, are all capable of measuring the wide range of metabolites of all classes via analytical techniques commonly used in metabolomics research. In addition, the GC/MS is restricted to heatstable and volatile analyses, but it has a more sensitive magnitude than the NMR to show a linear signal to a concentration relationship. For almost every biomolecule, the NMR technique provides extensive structural information, and the signal strength is directly associated to the richness of analyte, although it is far less sensitive for superficial quantification than the MS method [38]. However, many types of NMR tests can be used to solve overlap peaks in a complex NMR spectrum [39]. LC-MS is even more sensitive than GC-MS, as volatility and thermal labiality are unnecessary. The process of ESI ionization is reasonable and cannot produce a linear signal, as the concentration curve numbers of the compounds are simultaneously ionized [40]. Semiquantitative approaches in SD metabolomics, such as comparative identifications, where abundance alterations are quantified instead of absolute measurements [41], are chosen because of the calibration curve requirements or internal standard curves using reference compound samples [42]. GC-MS is generally acceptable to relatively quantify prudently controlled and randomized samples through a spectral comparison. Relative quantification of LC-MS due to ion suppression phenomena [43] is significantly less reliable. In LC-MS analysis of complex samples, this method can be used to prevent the perplexing effects of the ESI ion suppression. The isotope dilution analysis is based on the principle that the two compounds, which only diverge by mass, can be effectively purified by substituting one or more

6

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

resilient, heavy atom isotopes enriched after isolation [44]. Absolute quantification can be adjusted before work and analysis by adding a reference substance. Finding sources of etiquette blends can be difficult with this approach, which is used comprehensively in proteomics to improve proteomics, and continues to be used for the purpose of prevention of these metabolic indentations in plant suspension and in whole plants [45]. This approach is also difficult to use in the measurement of numerous compounds. This method can easily be used for comparative measurement of several compounds by blending labeled and unlabeled substances for each experimental sample, or by producing a large amount of plant material labeled that can be spiked into a large number of unlabeled experimental samples. A complete quantification of the specific metabolites of labeled plant material can be achieved by means of a modified approach using reverse dilution [46]. The identification of high throughput compounds is an important challenge for metabolomics with multiple vagueness dimensions in the most commonly applied technology. The usage of standard compounds is certainly often practicable since no reference compounds exist. Different methods vary significantly, depending on the standardization of the methodology, how useful these comparisons are, and the resources available for comparisons from a publicly accessible database. In order to permit the similar match to chromatographic or spectral data, high confidence identification typically depends on the direct comparison with standard reference combinations. For example, the GC/MS can be very consistent between various instruments and several laboratories with both fragmentations from electron ionization (EI) to indexed retention times (IRT) [47–50]. MS-MS spectrums can theoretically provide appropriate fragmentation data for the development of a spectrum database matching strategy for GC-MS identification. However, the MS-MS spectrum varies from instrument to instrument, making it less efficient to match MS-MS spectral library strategies. NIST has taken the lead in providing reliable information through a collection of 14,802 positive and 1410 negative ions. Meticulous advances have also been made in the METLIN database, in which 573 positive ions and 587 negative spectrums with 881 metabolites [49] were reported. This database could be a foundation for standardization of MS-MS and could make research into LC-MS/MS libraries feasible. Even if the results are not always precise, the NMR and IR spectrums can often be determined. A NMR spectral database for over 19,700 compounds including several simulations beside spectrums collected from standard compounds [51] is available at the Madison Metabolomics Consortium Database.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

7

Metabolite removal usually involves homogenization and extraction processes that interfere with analysis from other plant components, while homogenization totally destroys valuable information on the distribution of metabolites in a sample [31]. However, there are several techniques such as brute strength generally used in melon dissecting, homogenizing, and analyzing particular zones of larger plant organs [52], which are not so promising for smaller tissues. Laser-based micro dissection techniques are also vital in the testing of few types of cells and do not allow a simple, comprehensive view of metabolite availability [53]. Many mass spectrometry (MS) approaches provide spatially relatively low space measurements to multiple species [54]. The number is limited to Ionization of the Electrospray (DESI) images [55] and Ionization of Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) images [56]. The best-quality resolution image (1 nm) is provided by SIMS Image analysis though high-energy ionization molecular fragmentation, which can reduce that approach. DESI is a notable lower-resolution approach (>250 μm), but it is also a far lower power approach that makes intact molecular ions possible. A 20–200 μm resolution of the MALDI image is outstanding [57]. MALDI does not use an ion beam, but uses the laser to use the matrix as a tool for ionization. MALDI is a smooth ionization process, like DESI, which leads to intact molecular ions with one charge. The extreme degree of spectral overlap around small molecules vis-a`-vis the signal is one of the major challenges in MALDI imagery. MALDI is equipped with an AP laser, exciting the sample water matrix [58] while the C-60 and colloidal graphite [58] have been used to deal with any interference with a high peak molecular matrix. Next, the MS-tandem is monitored to reduce the background noise of selected solid-fragmentation reaction products [59]; the default UV laser matrix is then applied and special surfaces such as porous silicone guns [60] are applied. Zhang and colleagues attributed MALDI images with standard MALDI matrix methods with the use of colloidal graphite in the mature apple and strawberry areas. This survey showed colloidal graphite that produced superior results with reduced interference in the matrix. MS-MS supports the assignment of compounds, but MS data has only been generated for apples, strawberries, and compound distributors. MS-MS transitions were shown for signal improvement in strawberry samples. This colloidal approach was used to study cuticular waxes and flavonoids on various surfaces, and across parts of Arabidopsis aerial tissue. Strawberries, bananas, grape, and organic acids were examined, and many sugars with lower fatty acids were observed. In the lipid matrix instead of lipids, hydrophilic analytes can be used. K-adducts and other amino acids were mostly found in oligosaccharide. This is the way to avoid exogenous matrix [61].

8

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

1.4 Metabolic perspectives Metabolomics became one of the great achievements of the present scientific research and has set the stage for the accurate profiling of metabolites in every species [1]. The quantitative plant metabolomics provides us with complete plant metabolism knowledge to improve crop yields [62]. A wide range of metabolites can be detected from one unique extract and can be used for quick and accurate analysis. Since metabolomics progresses quickly, transgenic line and mutant metabolite studies can be used to understand the metabolic networks and define the fundamental genes in addition to resolving the gene function and its impact on metabolic pathways, and regulating and intercepting, which is difficult to accomplish with conventional assays [5]. An integrated approach that accepts genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics inferences enable scientists to mark and chart out genes to improve key characteristics for crop plants. The above omical studies have also been extended to include relevant regulatory measures such as epigenetic regulation, posttranscription, and posttranslation changes [63]. The plants are progressively seen as a key basis for a plant-related economy, providing food with improved nutrient supply, safety, stability, process capacity, and other features to meet existing and projected global consumer demands. For many crop species, the availability of transgenic systems increases the use of metabolomics that can rapidly up the selection and improvement of superior characteristics [64]. Methods and instruments for studying metabolomics, including the spectroscopic methods of metabolomics MS and NMR as discussed above, have made substantial progress. The metabolic platforms available at the moment are capable of allowing large-scale metabolite surveys covering both known and unknown metabolites. Bioinformatics and metabolomic databases are becoming more powerful, as is the one for the Arabidopsis model plant and other species as well [65]. A significant quantity of metabolic survey data is very useful for improving plants such as yield, resistance to disease, and tolerance of stress. In addition to the rapid generation of data on the genome scale through sequencing of DNA/RNA and the quantification of other metabolites by MS, it is necessary to collate this knowledge to formulate a complete chart for improving plant characteristics [66]. However, numerous current studies are being carried out in well-established model systems and these studies can also be followed in other plant species. The scientific community is currently facing a phenomenal task of management of huge multiomics data for framework-level analysis [9]. In such situations, the

Omic approaches

Genomics Genome

Gene

Transcriptomics Transcript

Proteomics

Synthesis

Epigenomics Transcriptional regulation

Epigenetic regulation

Phenomics

Protein

9

Basic plant improvement through knowledge driven techniques

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

Metabolomics Metabolite

Fig. 1.2 Overview of crop enhancement omics approaches.

analysis of these data sets in a stronger fusion, which eventually can be translated into better fusion, will require emerging tools in statistics and bioinformatics to improve the functioning and performance of the plant (Fig. 1.2).

1.5 Metabolomics and crop improvement Genetic plot or genomic selection by genetic markers is directly related to crop breeding [67]. Combined with other technologies, metabolomics enables us to solve key agronomic performance issues that have remained unsettled so far. Many efforts can be focused on crops with detailed performance information in a variety of environments [65]. The plant metabolomics technique can stimulate not only information on the number of identified metabolites but also their correlation with agricultural vital attributes, making it apparent for more rational designs to connect specific metabolites or pathways to characteristics associated with yield or quality. A more encouraging relationship between metabolite changes and the resulting phenotypes is, however, more likely [62]. The continuous efforts to explicate metabolic responses to different stresses also make metabolomebased breeding helpful and appropriate in obtaining stress-resistant plants [68]. Effective metabolic pathways of plant engineering with contemporary technologies will bring greater assistances to human survival by serving them with food and medicine [64]. For instance, vitamin A is accumulated at higher levels in Golden Rice, showing that metabolic engineering can improve the crop nutrient level [69]. Although the absence of collaborating

10

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

information makes it difficult to identify a protective part of a particular metabolite, a comparison of stressed and unfit species or cultivars is one way to recognize adaptive changes in metabolites. In the forage legume Lotus corniculatus, a low degree of super lapse in dry metabolism was discovered, indicating a high degree of bio-functionality between small MW metabolites species [70, 71]. The degree of change between the glycophyte and halophyte species nevertheless had a similar propensity. In accordance with the preadaptation model, those changes might remain connected with diverse base levels. An NMR-based study of maize profiling metabolites found that the osmotic component of salinity is linked to early saltiness effects. In addition, the observations were consistently stronger in shoots than in roots with a stronger osmotic effect [72]. Recently, sugars and polyamines have been observed to participate in cold adaptation mechanisms in inappropriate Thellungiella accessions [73, 74]. Similar metabolite fingerprints were observed, demonstrating that the mechanisms for cold adjustments could also be the same among kingdoms. Moreover, the important metabolic changes taking place during cold acclimatization reinforce the idea that the synthesis of cryo-protective molecules like sugars and other associated substances are vital. The accumulation of these molecules (maltose, sucrose, trehalose, amino acids, glycerols) in adapted persons could therefore increase the tolerance of cold stress [75]. Samples from the maize hybrid were analyzed with GC-MS, indicating the metabolic differences between the greenhouse and field conditions in a recent study that were different in drought tolerance and dehydrated in greenhouse conditions. A definite peculiarity among the tolerant and sensitive genotypes for plant phenotyping, metabolite response related to tolerance could be observed [76], showing the power of metabolite-profiling techniques to demonstrate environmentally masked differences. However, the importance of an adequate phenotype assessment for metabolic marker development and stress tolerance is important to emphasize [77]. A tolerance feature in crops was regarded as tolerance to salt stress in the ability to maintain high salinity growth even at high Na + levels. In addition, the salt stress mechanisms of other glycophytes in citrus plants are certainly different where tolerance is the ability to decrease the Cl
absorption of the aerial section. Furthermore, the ability to reduce the metal intake in photosynthetic organs is considered a tolerance feature in other stress conditions, such as heavy metal contamination. Phytochelatin biosynthesis and glutathione metabolism are exceptionally upregulated in these species, when cultivated at high metal concentrations. Some hyperaccumulators can accumulate

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

11

metals; however, a direct correlation among citrate and accumulation of metal ions in the analyzed species was found in studies and high levels of malonate in leaves, particularly in hyperaccumulators, which were probably found to act as a mechanism for storing metal [78]. Each of these findings suggests the need for additional physiological reporting to understand in what way plants react to abiotic stress and not to use physiological answers as markers of stress tolerance; further assessment under various stress conditions is required [79].

1.5.1 High CO2 stress: Its quality and yield characteristics A major challenge for agriculture in the 21st century remains sustainable cultivation against increasing levels of CO2. However, the availability of water and carbon dioxide are directly linked to plant photosynthesis with respect to visual growth, C sequestration, and that helps to preserve terrestrial ecosystems [80]. Land-based plants and aquatic phyto plants use increased concentration of CO2 in significant ways to increase their biomass [81]. As high levels of CO2 are documented, growth of grass species may be promoted, which is a positive finding for food crops like cereals. The ultimate sink of the plant is fruit, grain, and tuber. The growth of this sink organ depends directly on the division between the source and sink organs. A number of metabolites relying on other components are stored in sink organs such as species type, source power, photosynthesis composition, and plant demand [82]. Several reports have documented the correlation between high CO2 and yield in many commercial crop species. Excessive CO2, for example, has been reported to increase production significantly. More reports in wheat or rice have been validated for a higher level of atmospheric CO2 yield stimulation [83]. Also, in potatoes, the results were comparable, where enriched CO2 agriculture resulted in a 54% increase in tuber yield. Likewise, the increased CO2 level recorded a higher cotton yield but was lower than the yield at high temperatures [84]. Since most reports in carbon-rich cereals have increased yields of high CO2 and the significant requirement for food quality and safety to meet demand has remained, wheat grown in higher CO2-open conditions shows a slower nitrate metabolism. Sustainable food safety and nutritional quality demands have been shown. The nitrogen decline in cereals is due to higher carbohydrate levels [85]. The total content of amino acids was found to be at higher levels in soyabean leaves at the beginning of the season, but later they began to increase again [86]. The amino acid level of Chinese root is also

12

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

effectively reduced by a combination of a higher temperature and CO2, and in the strawberry fruit they increase the index of sugar and sweetness, and decrease the amount of antioxidants and nitrogen [85]. More CO2 has proven to have a huge impact on the quality of mustard oil due to a rise in the content of starch and oil on the cost of proteins. The elevated levels of carbohydrates induce the increasing levels of the oleic acid in lipids and reducing levels of linolenic acid and nervous acid [87] which have their effects on the lipid composition of mosquitos [87]. CO2 enrichment has decreased while the quality of mustard seeds has improved. It is documented that crops grown under prominent CO2 produce higher yields, but can significantly influence the nutritional content of crops, notably amino acids [88].

1.5.2 Horticultural crops (fruits) In particular for ripening and quality, metabolomics have indicated higher levels of understanding in fruit biology. Metabolome is useful for distinguishing a correlation with transcriptome of the fruits; it is also used in genome wide-ranging metabolic studies to explain diverse and differential biochemical pathways of tomatoes and ecotypes and ancestral species [21]. Organic acid, sugars, flavonoids, and carotenoids are well established in Citrus fruits. Metabolic studies have identified 130 metabolites like acids, sugars, flavonoids, alkaline, limonoids, coumarins, and other plant hormones with greater levels of lycopene and that are sweeter than the wild type [89]. Higher levels of soluble sugars, lower organic acid levels, and the differential levels of flavonoids at a maturing stage determined the taste and flavor. The Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection, which causes Citrus Huanglongbing, impairs the quality of the species’ juice [90]. Alanine, arginine, isoleucine, leucine, proline, threonine, and valinic acids are increased in the infection although citrates and phenylalanine levels improve. Fruit thermal treatment is widely used for fruit prevention, which has strong metabolomics storage support during the postharvest period. ABA is also reportedly used during fruit development as a biosynthesis regulator for citrus cuticular wax. Heat therapy reduces organic and amino acid content significantly, although certain metabolites are accreted, such as 2-keto-D gluconic, oleic acid, ornithine, succinic acid, myo-inositol, fructose, and so on [91]. In its peel and flesh, apples include a number of beneficial antioxidant substances to lessen the risk of various diseases like asthma, cancer, and diabetes. In order to distinguish between commercially important cultivars

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

13

[92], the metabolite content of apples is often used. One variety called Golden Delicious contains elevated amounts of succinic acid and myo inositol but there are higher amounts of triterpene, flavonoids, stearic, and carbohydrates available in Red Delicious varieties. The apple fruit metabolome analysis and [93] three-dimensional allocation of metabolites are well explained. Metabolomics on stored apples demonstrated a variation in primary metabolites with different lengths of time. Increased mannose and xylose levels due to cell wall hemicellulose breakdown and a wellestablished correlation with regulation of metabolome were used for fruit senescence during the postharvest period [27]. Kiwifruit offers huge health-related nutrients such as fiber and vitamin C. Nardozza et al. [94] identified 51 metabolites during kiwi improvement besides the ripening process as well. During the ripening process, however, the concentration of soluble sugars significantly changes and finally, the quality and taste of the fruit is determined. Synthetic cytokine substantially upsurges the size of the fruit and influences the ripening process in metabolites such as amino acids, sugars, organic acids, etc. [95]. Likewise in Vitis vinifera grapes, the creation of fruit relies on plenty of metabolites, and the expression of hormones and pathways of metabolism of sugar can be controlled. In regions with high sunlight and low rainfall, the grape metabolite content varies geographically, as the grapes produced have enriched sugar content and amino acids, Na, and Ca, and the low levels of organic acids, which play the role of external factors in the quality of grapes. The abundance of metabolites in grapes is described as stage specific and culture specific, and regulates the ripening process [96]. The main reason for grape metabolomics was the identification of some 100 metabolites used to construct a new product database [95, 96]. The metabolomics analysis of Pyrus communis confirmed that approximately 250 metabolites were accumulated during fruit development and maturation [96]. Mature potato fruit has manifested sugar accumulation and amino acids containing S, phytohormones like ABA and brassinoid, and 15 phytohormones have been detected including ABA, auxin, brassinoid acids, gibberellin, JA, and SA. The flowering stage shows significant increases in metabolites like amino and organic acids, which further decrease with the development of fruit. Similarly in strawberry, Aharoni et al. have demonstrated the process of gaining and losing aromas of strawberries during development and domesticating [97]. Most of the terpenoides, like monoand Sesqui-terpenes, are frequently comprised in cropped strawberry species. However, olefin monoterpenes and myrtenyl acetate are rich in wild

14

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

species [98]. During fruit development and fruit maturation, GC/MS and HPLC showed a change in the metabolite content in strawberry. Maturation of strawberries led to increased amino acid content, including substantial sugar changes, including ester biosynthesis, shikimates and tricarboxylic acid [99]. As a result, the sugar content has changed significantly with reference to biotic stress and fungicide on the quality of strawberry. Infection with Colletotrichum nymphaeae induces sugar build-up and lowers biologic acid levels. The fruits showed modified metabolite content, like flavanols and phenolic substances. The increase by fungal pathogens viz., in the levels of polyphenol of white-fruited strawberry species by Botrytis cinerea, was reported, as well as Colletotrichum acutatum [100].

1.5.3 Cereal and legume crops The qualitative and quantitative metabolomic analysis of numerous cereals, i.e., rice, maize, wheat, barley, and oat, reveals the specific cereal metabolome [101]. Early chemical cereal analysis focused on measuring compounds of N, P, dietary fiber, sugars, and protein content [102]. A substantial study of the regulation of proteins, carbohydrates, and energy consumption systems were determined by 14C isotope labeling in wheat plants, and a phenolic profiling of several cereal plants was reported as early as the 1960s [103]. Until 2000, the bulk of the cereal metabolomic studies relating to different biotic and abiotic stresses directly targeted analysis of vitamins, sterols, phenolics, volatile compositions, and metabolites [104]. Metabolomic fingerprints of transgenic field samples of field-grown wheat were the first completion of the cereal metabolomic analysis with the use of 1D 1H NMR and GC-MS [105] as well as rice plant metabolomics during plant production using GC-MS [106]. In continuous development and progress in analysis, and ensuing elucidation of highly intricate metabolomic datasets, the role of metabolomics in cereal science has been appreciably expanded. The constituents present are starch, nutritional fiber, proteins, and sugars in grains of cereals. However, small metabolites, such as phenolic acids, sterols, and flavonoids, contribute considerably to the features of the seed [107]. In particular, polyphenols have been very carefully considered recently because of their tolerance mechanisms regarding abiotic/biotic stresses [108]. One of the most highly prized sources of polyphenols used in the human diets is a grain and cereal product that includes 4-hydroxybenzoic acid compounds and hydroxycinnamic acids, i.e., vanilic, gallic, and other coumaric acids. Cereal phenolics contain sugars and

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

15

other ingredients that change their solubility or bioactivity in free and combined forms. The main components of cereal and cereal products are phenolic acids [109]. In addition, it was argued that polyphene and antioxidant contents might be highly dependent on the β-glucan content in barley. Due to growing conditions and geographical region, the phytochemical composition of one cereal variety can vary greatly [110]. The quantity of variation and its association with sequence variation were studied in cereals. Different research groups studying rice to investigate the diversity of metabolites between various varieties and natural variants have used the potential of metabolomics. Similarly, studies of maize metabolomics have made it possible for investigators to differentiate and pick elite genotypes with advanced production and other qualities [111]. The method is used to measure the chemistry of different types of variants in maize, wheat, and rice [112]. In maize, the metabolism of amino acids has shown that drought stress is regulated. Photorespirations are strictly regulated under drought, with alanine and glycine being regulated by these two amino acids. In addition, glycine and myo-inositol accumulation has been reported in connection with the grain size of corn during dryness, implying that these metabolites are potential markers of the identification of maize tolerant to drought [113]. As confirmed by Ogbaga et al. [113], in sorghum, there is considerable variation in the plant’s capability to acquire and restructure its metabolic status to deal with drought. In comparison to the less drought resilient trait that has accumulated free amino acids under drought, sorghums have greater tolerance to drought and accumulate sugars and alcohols. A marked abundance of soluble amino acid sugars was also observed under salinity stress in the roots of tolerant barley plants [114]. Like drought, the buildup of sugars and amino acids is well known to cause chilling stress. Chilling stress, for example, caused significant changes in the metabolism of two varieties of rice: Nipponbare (Japanese) and 19–11 (Indian) [115]. The Nipponbare chilling tolerance included metabolic adjustment to activate antioxidant pathways through modulation of key metabolites like γ-glutamyl-isoleucine, glycine, adenine, dinucleotides, and putrescin [115]. Cold stress, in the case of both wheat and barley, speeds up the amino acid pool and encourages γ-amino butyric acid (GABA)-shunt genetic engines to promote glutamate conversion to GABA [68]. Cereal grains are well known to accumulate flavones/flavone glycosides that protect plants from many stresses [116] as rice generates sufficiently flavonoids to protect against various abiotic and biotic stresses [117]. A range of tolerant weeds, such as Coumaroyl sputum and Coumaroyl agmatine, may accumulate a variety

16

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

of metabolic tolerants during the stress conditions. In addition, an evaluation of and placing on metabolic pathways of these hydroxycinnamic amide compounds helps in documentation of significant transmitting gene agmatine coumaroyl [118]. Likewise, the identification of a collection of 81 metabolites connected with mitochondria, which would lead to an enhancement in levels of breathable and glycolytic metabolites such as amino acid, NAD, and NADH, coupled with an ATP [119] decrease, is associated with flooding stress in soy. Drought and salinity indicated a decrease in the TCA cycle intermediates and in the glycolytical pathways from four different varieties [119]. Another report, which assessed the impact on Lupinus albus of water deficiency, established the plant stem as a sugar and amino-acid storage organ [120]. In particular, the tolerant plant had significantly accumulated higher metabolites in the stem stelar region, like asparagine, sucrose, or proline [120]. In soybean, there have been consistent increases in normal, drought-stressed conditions, of pinitol in the tolerant plant. Similarly, in tolerant soybean, in response to water pressure, accumulated sucrose, free amino acids, and soluble proteins [121] were observed. Similarly, sucrose, amino acids, and proteins were found accumulated in tolerant soybeans to respond to water stress [121].

1.5.4 Vegetable crops Carotenoids, antioxidants, and flavonoids are present in large quantities in Solanum lycopersicum [122]. The pattern of 50 tomato cultivars was shown as metabolite segregation with a close arrangement of fruit segregation [123]. Onions are the world’s fifth biggest crop and one of the earliest domesticated plants in the world. Onions grow in temperate and tropical areas, with a broad spectrum of ornamental and nutritious features. The nutritional quality of onions is dependent upon metabolite composition and function. The onion produces a range of secondary metabolites, quercitin, triogeosides, ascalonicosides, gitogenin, β-chlorogenin, cepagenin, diallylsulfides, vanylic acid, and other acids. Diets rich in saponins and sapogenins are cholesterol reducing, immune-stimulating, antipiling, and tumor preventing. Flavonol-rich and flavonoid diets have anti-HIV characteristics, low LDL-cholesterol, and risk-reduction or risk neutralization for free radicals [124]. Diallyl sulfides in ointments reduces the risk of cancer and heart conditions [125]. Cells can be protected by the regulation of the DNA

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

17

repair system by antioxidants that are present in garlic. Generally, onions have a wide range of secondary metabolites, and crops can potentially enhance cultivars of nutraceutical onions. Horticultural characteristics of onions have been significantly enhanced by traditional breeding attempts [126].

1.5.5 Genetically modified crops Omic technologies are essential instruments to understand an organism’s response to genetic-environmental impacts [127]. Consequently, metabolome analysis could prove effective for GMOs with new dimensions to detect the effects that could be caused by the application of genetic engineering. However, metabolomics analysis is challenging, as plants have a much larger diversity of metabolites than other living organisms [16]. The GMOs and other conventional organisms have been studied with metabolomic approaches over the past few years. A variety of plants were mainly analyzed using MS or NMR platforms combined with several statistical methodologies [23]. Many of the new transgenic crops are quickly introduced on the global market with desired characteristics. Metabolomics for the safety assessment of GMOs provide relevant information on the related alteration of the metabolite following the gene modification. Advances in analysis platforms have been instrumental in detecting possible genetically modified (GM) effects at molecular levels to address these challenges. In order to investigate the natural metabolome variability, metabolomic study by comparing genetically modified plants with its wild parent varieties is frequently pooled with various crop situations. In rice biotechnology, notable advances have been accomplished in order to solve disease, insect, pesticide, and abiotic stress problems that reduce yields. The approach of metabolomics to the study of rice has proved a useful one. Different developments in rice metabolomics have been defined, including their application in the determination of the unforeseen, unwanted compound stored in GM fruit [128]. Transforming GM rice with B. thuringiensis gene cry1Ab was used as a sample medium to check for genetic fingerprinting suitability for FTIR and NMR. GC-FID was applied to metabolic profiling for three (03) insecticide transgenic lines of GM rice with Cry1Ac [129]. The main flavonoids detected with LC included a large number of types of GM flavonoids, dihydroquercetin (taxifolin), dihydro-isorhamnetin (30 -O-methyl taxifolin), and 30 -O-methyl quercetin.

18

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

An assessment of NADPH-dependent (YK1) dihydroflavonol-4-reductase gene (DFR) and biotic/abiotic stress tolerances was carried out in GM crop plants [130]. For the prediction of important agronomical characteristics of GM maize, which comprise about 25% of the total cultivated maize, metabolomics has proven useful [131–133]. The GM Glycine max is among the most common GM crops in the world, and is a variety tolerant to glyphosate herbicides. Garcı´a-Villalba et al. [134] supported the first work concerning substantial equivalence of GM soybean by the metabolomic approach. The authors developed an analysis strategy for CE-MS that compares the metabolic profile of soybean [134]. The profile for metabolite in herbicide tolerant GM soya is well recognized, which expresses an anthranilate synthetic gene (ASA2), characterized by tryptophan accumulation in leaves, seeds, and embryogenic cultures [135]. GM tobacco was also examined for metabolomics studies [136] and chlorogenic acid, malic acid, glucose, and saccharose were the main compounds contributing to the perception. In order to study different metabolites of GM lettuce with improved growth characteristics, Sobolev and others [137] used NMR to overexpress the E. coli Asparagine synthetase gene. The statistical assessment of the NMR information has shown that brief chain inulin oligosaccharides have considerably risen in GM lettuce leaves compared with wild crops. This was particularly significant since the transgenes aim at transforming the level of asparagine in conjunction with the status of N, rather than the content of the carbohydrate [137]. Current metabolomics applications in plant biotechnology are outlined in Table 1.1. Metabolomics gives an additional dimension to genetically modified crop analysis, which enables both intended and unintended effects to be dated in GM plants due to metabolic modification. Consequently, metabolomics analyses paralleling the GM and non GM crops are usually acquired with parallel study of the effect of genetic modification using different conditions of culture at different geographical locations [129]. For the substantial equivalent assessment of GM crops, many reports have taken account of natural variation. When the differences in natural variation between a genetically modified plant and its non-GM counterparty parent lines are considered safe on the metabolic level [16], multiple platforms for the sensitive and robust detection of as many metabolites as possible [5] and investigating metabolomic changeability in crop plants rather than only rice [128] or maize [139], i.e., soya [5], remain necessary for accelerating molecular characterization in metabolomic plants.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

19

Table 1.1 Recent uses of plant biotechnology metabolomics. Microorganism

Application

Catharanthus roseus

Development in ORCA3 and G10H production for indole alkaloid anticancer plants of Catharanthus roseus Salt tolerance amplification by decreased OsSUT1 expression Unintended effects of cryIAc and sck genes

Oryza sativa

Arabidopsis thaliana Solanum lycopersicum

Poncirus trifoliata Panicum virgatum

Solanum tuberosum

A distinction is made between transgenic and nontransgenic crops Greater accumulation of flavonoids, hence the nutritional significance of HP1/LeDDB1 gene mutation tomato plants Iron deficiency stress response via molecular reactions Significantly increased phenolic acid amounts and analog mono-lignol associated with easier cell wall deconstruction Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase 1 expression and amplified tolerance for drought

Technology used

Reference

NMR

[60]

GC-TOF/ MS GC-FID and GC-MS NMR

[1] [131]

[62]

LC-ECI/ MS

[5]

GC-MS

[80]

GC-MS

[138]

GC-MS

[61]

1.6 Metabolome and its networking The final recipients of biological information flows are metabolites (primary and secondary) in plant cells. Qualitative and quantitative metabolite measures reflect the cellular state under definite circumstances and provides a specific understanding of cellular processes in cells, tissue, or entire organism biochemistry [140]. Metabolomics, for example, varies from standard, focused phytochemical assessment from a statistical-power technique guided by information that seeks to evaluate all quantifiable metabolites without perception or preselection. Metabolomics also becomes a useful tool for monitoring and assessing the function of genes and characterizing postgenomic developments from a larger viewpoint [141]. Here, a research tool

20

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

will be created to investigate various aspects of plant biology, which includes the fundamental analytical technology and the ensuing multivariate data analyses tangled in plant methodology. Due to the complicated and divergent cell metabolome, a mixture of two or more metabolomic methods for an extensive plant metabolome cover can be evaluated. A wide metabolic picture [142] is provided in each metabolomic method by combining several simultaneous and supplementary schemes of assessment, including distinct removal procedures. Metabolites are inherent in a complicated network structure and can not only be considered as a linking factor in pheno- and genotypes but also acting as connecting component at the cellular level. A wide-ranging metabolism study focused on understanding the association between metabolism and other levels of the cell that impact on it, such as transcription and translation regulation [143, 144], as well as the abundance of protein was established on the basis of fundamental networks and advances in complex network research [145, 146]. The nonlinarites in relationships that underlie formal large-scale analysis of the metabolism is especially interesting, even streamlining guarantees regarding the legislation regulating molecular conversion. Since metabolomics is a reading of a complicated communication network structure, the regulation underlying it can be revealed in a network context. In the case of the metabolic networks model, two main approaches are usually used, i.e., kinetic and stoichiometry methods. The rates for the changes in the metabolites of kinetic enzyme are classic kinetic modeling techniques, e.g., mass action and derivatives of the enzyme with corresponding parameters (Vmax and Michaelis Menten) and dissociation constant (Km): dðX=tÞ ¼ N  vI ðX  pÞ where v is the vectors of metabolite (rates or velocities), p is parameters, X is the metabolite concentration, and N is the stoichiometric matrix. These methods are being used significantly for studying metabolic networks of small and medium size [147]. In the last two decades, however, advances in high-performance technology have paved the way for major metabolic network reconstructions, aimed at an integrated perspective on the metabolism of an organism. These models not only represent the stoichiometry in the stoichiometric matrix of several hundred to thousands of metabolite reactions; they are also represented mathematically in the relationship between gene and reaction. For instance, this annotation enables the gene knockout phenotype to be studied or transcriptomic data integrated in silicon [148]. A large collection of stichio-based approaches was produced in parallel with

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

21

genome scale models because the kinetic depiction of the performance of a larger network is disturbed, along with the fundamental kinetics and particular parameters, by uncertainties. These approaches stem from the standard design of flux balance analysis (FBA) [149] and all of them rely solely on the stoichiometry of the network in view of the physic-chemical constrictions and on optimization that scrutinizes the organism. Moreover, these metabolic level modifications assume that the system under consideration can be understood in a steady state [150], This is based on the FBA methods. For example: d Xt ¼ N  vðX, pÞ ¼ 0 The steady state theory allows the solution of the metabolic flux scheme, Nv ¼ 0. Moreover, detailed techniques have been created to facilitate the inclusion, not only of metabolomics information, but also of highperformance information at other stages of cellular organization.

1.7 Model building algorithm—Tissue-specific metabolic network Metabolites perceived in specific cells or organs are used in the model building algorithm (MBA). The MBA was used for extraction from generic to tissue extract-specific model Arabidopsis to extract 10 metabolic tissuespecific networks, i.e., light cultivation, dark cultivation, silica, flower buds, open bloom, root (10 days), root (23 days), juvenile leaf, cotyledons, and seed from an A. thaliana [151]. In addition to the generically based response to their source system, i.e., Arabidopsis sps., or any other closely related reactions, the method is to strictly fit into the modeling of plant specific requirements by allowing not only the addition of general responses to core reaction set, but also the reduction of irreversibility of prevailing core responses. Finally, there is a restraint that applies to the production under minimal media of all biomass compounds.

1.8 Metabolism, metabolomics, and expression moderated inactivation of the gene (GIM3E)— Network-specific model of expulsion GIM3E is an extension of a network extraction approach to GIMME [152] that assimilates the transcriptomic data, derives constants for the responses envisaged, and thus calculates the smallest penalty score condition-specific

22

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

models. GIM3E integrates metabolic information by incorporating metabolites and a sinking response to the generic template. So, flux throughout the corresponding metabolite reaction is to be attained, and testing metabolites can be incorporated through the imposition of a minimum flow for the corresponding metabolite turnover. This approach is based on a mobile objective, for instance, maximizing biomass, with an extra constraint for the implementation of the sales fluxes as an optimum value. The metabolism of S. typhimurium was reported by the algorithm, in particular to investigate the rotation of metabolites in two developments, explicitly rich and virulent media. Likewise, MBA has the advantage of gaining insight into the metabolite turnover rates in the system under investigation. The way of converting all inverse responses into pairs of responses, i.e., the choice to trigger a couple of forward or backward responses, is a mixed integer linear system (MILP).

1.9 Integration of kinetic and stoichiometry—Modeling Yizhak et al. [153] presented integrated metabolomics and proteomics with genome-size model of a metabolic (IOMA) network that is the most consistent in the methods used to integrate quantitative proteomics and metabolomics data using Michaelis-Menten with a stable-state flux dissemination within a metabolic network. These predictions are incorporated via a quadratic program (QP) in the global flow projection, which offers a possible stream allocation, which is as compatible as possible with the information rate. Two comparison analyses have verified the template. First, the probabilistic performances of the technique of minimization of metabolic adjustment (MOMA) approach was related to the technique frequently used to define a viable flow allocation. Second, in studies of genetic disruption in E. coli, the results of the approach were paralleled with MOMA and FBA for available measurements of proteomics, metabolomics, and flows. The main benefit of this technique is the program formulation that aims at minimizing errors from noisy data; however, only well studied organisms can apply this method. Dynamic flux balance assessments allow the use of dynamic forecasts with limited kinetic parameter knowledge. The enzyme activities and data fitting for the metabolite concentrations observed are measured by kinetic modeled parameters of accurate enzyme kinetics in the metabolistic dynamics. The large amount of data requires only moderate scale and complexity, well-studied systems of the application of kinetic modeling methods [154].

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

23

As an alternative to the prediction of time-bound metabolite and flux scatterings with insufficient knowledge of the enzyme cinematics, Mahadevan et al. [155] offered a dynamic flow balance (DFBA) analysis. DFBA overcomes the major downside of classical FBA, which, by analyzing the dynamic behavior of a network, precludes stable state presumption after introduction of two DFBA formulations, i.e., dynamic and static [155–159]. After comparative analysis of variations using the kinetic model of the Calvin-Benson cycle and a model of the plant carbohydrate metabolism, DFBA-based methods were found to precisely predict changes in metabolic state. Therefore, DFBA and its extension systems are designed to present modeling hypotheses with small enzymatic details for the dynamics of metabolism [160–162]. Grafahrend-Belau et al. [163], by contrast, used the DFBA’s static variant combined with a multiscale modeling approach to achieve spatio-temporal resolution of H. vulgarae interactions by adding static organism specific models into an entire plant dynamic model. Over and above the measurement periods, further DOA DFBA variants can also predict flow and metabolite levels. Concentrations of metabolic networks of metabolites are intrinsically linked with Gibbs Energy G’s Thermodynamic potential by: ΔG ¼ ΔG° + RT √ lnP
RT √ ln S where G is Gibbs energy standard, R is universal gas constant, T is temperature, and P and S are concentrations of reactants and substrates. Gibbs energy negative shows that a particular response goes forward, while a positive Gibbs energy shows the reaction goes back. Many methods use these details to incorporate or to obtain metabolite concentrations or distance measurements from the predicted model [164, 165].

1.9.1 Metabolic tug of war Tepper et al. [166] projected an approach for calculating the concentrations of steady-state metabolites and flow values on genomics scale in microorganisms. A metabolic tug-of-war approach (mTOW) proposes an important balance entry augmenting the competence of enzymes and minimizing the total amount of metabolites. The computational formulation shows the balance between the minimization, and the maintenance of the sufficient forward dynamic force for all reactions established on thermodynamics, of the total concentration of intermediate metabolite. A nonconvex optimization process to assess the distribution and the concentrations of the fluxes in

24

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

E. coli and Clostridium acetobutylicum, which reduces together metabolite and enzyme levels via Gibb’s free energy [167]. Under various growth conditions, mToW was discovered to describe up to 55% of modifications observed in metabolite levels in both species and a first research was presented, which could forecast metabolites at high efficiency in the microorganism. However, its nonconvexity in formulating the problem is a drawback to the approach [168, 169].

1.10 Genome sequencing model for metabolite networking Current sequencing technology is building thousands of genome sequencing transforming bioinformatics approaches every year to increase the utility for high performance functioning genome-wide metabolic models. The conditions of culture, predicted phenotypes, and experimental data in the metabolic network, predict and integrate badly transcribed areas identified with the operative genome-scaled metabolic model. The metabolic genome-scale models are central in sequence data production in order to provide comprehensive and quantitative organism behavioral predictions. The rehabilitation of the genome has recently been well established by many researchers and every step of the reconstruction process is simplified and discussed in the following subsections [170, 171]. (i) draft genome sequence reconstruction; (ii) recovering and solving errors or inconsistencies; (iii) expressing external metabolites and equating biomass; and (iv) validation of model.

1.10.1 Draft genome sequence reconstruction The important path tools behind the Bio-Cyc collections, comprising the well-known EcoCyc databank [170, 172], as genomes were interpreted and metabolome genes established on EC code and name matching was identified. The pathway techniques include automatic gap filling algorithms as well. However, the automated output produced tools results in fragmented pathways, which require widespread cure, since the data in this resource is marvelous. In addition, the system is not clearly designed to model but rather to stock and regulate metabolic pathways. Feist et al. [173] pointed out that comprehensive manual curing will not be completely replaced by automated methods due to too many significant entities, and distinguishing between their own idiosyncrasies. In the autograph method, much of the

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

25

possible information is reused on the manual curing of existing metabolic models of the genome scale.

1.10.2 Recovering and solving errors or inconsistencies In order to check for defects, incorrect assignments, gains, and inconsistencies [174], the initial draft model involves manual curation of geneprotein-reaction associations. The annotation of metA in L is one perceptive discrepancy. While this organism does not possess TCA cycle, so Succinyl CoA is not produced, plantarum can produce homoserin succinyl CoA transmission. Nevertheless, databases correspond entirely on the function metA, probably because it is a member, including the Escherichia coli enzyme, of a distinct orthological group, that is, succinyl CoA [175]. The B. subtilis protein, however, has been shown to take acetyl-coA experimentally even in this orthologous cluster, although somehow this result has not been found in the database. However, the SEED model has maintained the explanation of Succinyl CoA but permits the construction of biomass by means of the methionine transport, even if domain experts are aware of this L. plantarum without methionine growth [172].

1.10.3 Expressing external metabolites and equating biomass There are numerous further steps to make any reconstruction a model, without which it is of poor prediction value, involving a minimum of experimental data. They are available in three different essences as biomass composition that should be defined, ideally for the various conditions of experimentation. Bioenergy data relates to pump and breathing chain stoichiometry information, as well as growth requirements for energy maintenance and ATP [176, 177]. Growth prerequisites were used to assess the biological significance of a disparity if, for example, a gap may be benign if the vitamin is not indispensable [172]. This information can also be used to define prospective internal metabolites to absorb them, i.e., network sources and transport schemes.

1.10.4 Validation of model Validating the model that provides comparison of all the components necessary for its formation with additional experimental data is required after its formation. One of these data sets is that for some model organisms like E. coli and yeasts. Their metabolism has been extensively tested and is relatively high against phenotypes of strain removal [178].

26

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

1.11 Plant bioactive metabolites and soil microbial community Soil represents a promising habitat for microorganisms and is habituated by a wide range of microorganisms, besides species richness, and forms of interactive microorganisms, and therefore, any soil change has a critical effect on the microbial community as regards its operation [179]. The “underground revolution” has attracted scientists’ attention to how underground ecosystems can influence and increase crop output [180]. Furthermore, a large number of living organism molecules may have a robust influence on the accessibility and acquisition of nutrients for plants and on rhizosphere microbial communities [181]. This part highlights microbial interaction between soil and plant roots within these unexpected ecosystems as well. The interactions of the roots, microorganisms, and soil fauna at ecosystem level leads to a complex rhizosphere of biological and ecological procedures. The study of the rhizosphere found that the interactions are mediated by the bimolecular exchanges as an intercellular signal while the roots; microorganisms, and fauna of the soil have successful interactions. Although bioactive molecules are important for sustainable agriculture, many functions for the advances of plant architect are less known. Bacteria and fungi are extremely flexible contributors to soil microbial diversity and can produce virtually any known biological reaction [182]. They contribute to major soil functions such as the growth of plants both in natural plant communities and in food, fiber, and energy-growing communities as well as to absorb, neutralize, and transform compounds that otherwise may become environmental pollutants. Soil organic matter, with the exception of untreated plants and animal tissues, partial deconstruction products, and soil biomass in the soil, is generally used as the soil’s organic constituents [183]. The organic soil offers the microorganisms a favorable habitat compared to the inorganic soil. Organic matter greatly influences the microbial diversity present within the soil. Organic soil material has consistently been reported to encourage the development of microbes such as bacteria, fungi, algae, protozoa, and several nematodes that are essential in the biochemical transformation of the soil in order to maintain its productivity. Probably the most diverse communities on Earth are soil microbial communities [184]. In the unseen underground environment, there are incredibly complex interactions between root and root, and microbe and root, which have both positive and negative consequences [181]. These complex interactions, such as host microbial interactions, biology, energy transfer, and information exchange, have a significant role to perform in terrestrial ecosystems [181].

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

27

Many studies show that these complex responses are intended to boost potential solutions for better plant yield in the underground ecosystem [180]. Plants can rely on bio-microbial compounds by coordinating their behavior, continually releasing a number of organic compounds into the rhizosphere to recruit beneficial microbes and eliminate pathogens that offer crop benefits and disadvantages [185]. The exudates from roots significantly impact the resource competition, availability of nutrients, chemical interference, and plant parasitism, which can have stimulating and negative influences on the structural community and composition of microbes in the rhizosphere [186]. Multifaceted signals, including synthesis, release, transmission, response, and feedback acquisition, are generated by plant or microbial cells [180–186]. The many gene expression levels are moderated during the information transmission process that may have a different effect on the behavior of plant microbial consortium. The QS, which is considered an important communication-signaling tool between plants and microorganisms in symbiosis, defense, and other communications, seems to be available in complex, invisible networks within the cross-speak system [187]. Root exudates—a range of secondary metabolites and antimicrobial peptides that may be used to inhibit the spread of fungal and bacterial phytopathogens and defense proteins. Root exudates, i.e., a variety of secondary and antibiotic metabolites which could prevent infection of fungal and bacterial pathogens and protein protection [188] include indole, saponin, flavonoids, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, chitosan and other substances [189]. Barley is used when Fusarium graminearum roots are attacked [190], and the synthesis of t-cinnamic acid has been induced to demonstrate an active, dynamic vegetable defense mechanism, to develop phenolic substances. Several studies have been carried out on rhizosphere populations on the stimulus of glucosinolates and hydrolyses [191]. Plant roots trigger a glucosinolate-myrosinase protective system and can act as biocontrol agent against fungal and bacterial pathogens in damaged plant tissues and products of hydrolysis such as isothiocyanates and ionic thiocyanates. However, secondary radicals on rhizosphere pathogens are not as effective; for instance, the generalized antifungal properties of the American ginseng saponin—ginsenosides have been identified, and also the growth of Cylindrocarpon destructans was stimulated [192, 193]. Mark et al. [194] observed the consequence of exudates from sugar beet varieties in P. aeruginosa transcriptome and the apparent genetically distinct exudates of Pseudomonas spp. Exudates and most genes were controlled as a response to just one of two exudates. For example, chemotaxis behavior studies have shown that microbes depend on root

28

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

exudates in their natural niches to locate and infect host plants [195]. A root exudate also serves as a sign of the germination and haustorium worm phase [196] between host cultures and fungi. A signal is provided between the active ingredients HIF and 2,6-dimethoxy-1,4-benzoquinone. Still, in the difficult subground situation of these plant-secreted compounds, flavones and isoflavones are responsible for the nodulation genes in N-fixing bacteria, which are helpful for leguminous plants, while Phytophthora sojae, a soy disease, zoospores are specifically for detection of host and introduction of diseases known for their varietal versatility [197]. Nevertheless, under complex underground conditions, such secreted components, i.e., nodulation N-genes, are shown to be versatile and bacteria to be fixed are induced by flavones while soybean pathogens, Phytophthora sojae, are particularly valued to host detection and initiation isoflavones [197]. The root functions of flavonoids within the rhizosphere are different with microorganisms, including chemo attraction, stimulation of rhizobial node gene expression, microconidia germination, root pathogen inhibition, and plant nutrients having an influence on quorum sensing and mediate allopathic plant relationships [198]. Plant roots are secreting allelochemicals as phytotoxins, which affect the surrounding crops in particular through rivalry in assets and germination and plant development. These damaging relationships also refer to the safety of plants in reaction to pressure or the circumstances of the local rhizosphere [199]. The root allochemicals of Bigalta limpograss are primarily phenolic inhibitors of plant growth [200]. It is established that GC-MS analyzed phenolic compounds contain the main rhizosphere compounds with known growth-related regulatory activities, 3-hydroxyhydro-cinnamic, benzoic, phenylacetic, and hydrocinnamic acid [201]. The biological communities’ metabolism in the vicinity of soil roots supports microscopic energy cycling, and there is a rapid increase in scientific research into these invisible underground ecosystems. In addition, efforts have been made to clarify the quorum sensing nature and release of various molecules. Upcoming studies will focus on contributing to biodiversity, variability, and productivity of these compounds. Increased use of fertilizers, water, pesticides, and fresh plant crops and other competences to boost production [202] have subsequently complemented the advancement of agriculture; the degradations in land and the loss of efficiency represent the byproduct of those unpreserved procedures. Moreover, the degree that traditional physical and chemical control techniques have enhanced plant manufacturing has begun to reduce [203]. Through multifactorial

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

29

rhizosphere reactions [204], the recent focus has been on possible strategies to ensure sustainable agriculture. The development of genetic engineering methods provided an occasion to promote favorable microbes, or against pathogens from transgenic plants, to change the release of pathogen repressed antibiotics, plant growth, and to increase the acquisition of nutrients, and to prevent QS signals essential for pathogenic life cycles in the rhizosphere. While some biological processes intended to influence yardsticks have been tested by altering rhizosphere characteristics, it remains difficult to use practical applications in this field due to consideration of large number of factors such as the recognition and complicated impacts between biological procedures and chemical molecules of important biological organisms. There is no knowledge of the signaling reaction and regulatory processes that are now at the heart of improved crop production in complex underground environments [205]. Moreover, the signals from microorganisms and plant cells are changed from time to time when roots and microbes go through numerous life cycle stages, varying molecular releases and combinations, making the study of rhizosphere communities very complex [206]. Therefore, more focus will be on new strategies to optimize soil ecology and increase yield and more study will also be necessary in reality on the feasibility of such approaches.

1.12 Perspective, conclusion, and future In recent years, plant metabolomics has dramatically improved due to increased interest in using metabolomic technologies for various biological targets. In relation to integrating metabolomics with omics or functional genetic studies, the ability of accessible analytical systems to analyze complicated and combined specimens can offer new insights into genetic and biochemical aspects of metabolic network control and cell function. The metabolomics are particularly important because the metabolites, particularly in comparison to DNAs, RNAs or proteins, are most relevant to plant phenotype. Future research will, therefore, focus on both directions likely to improve the metabolomic platform, so that the most secondary metabolites can be identified and quantified accurately and effectively. Another priority involves a complete study of nontarget and targeted approaches to expanding the understanding of the growth and development of crop physiology in both natural and strained circumstances, the molecular and physiological processes of crops, and their cellular variants.

30

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

References [1] A. Wuolikainen, P. Jonsson, M. Ahnlund, H. Antti, S.L. Marklund, T. Moritz, et al., Multi-platform mass spectrometry analysis of the CSF and plasma metabolomes of rigorously matched amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and control subjects, Mol. BioSyst. 12 (2016) 1287–1298, https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mb00711a. [2] M.F. Turner, A.L. Heuberger, J.S. Kirkwood, C.C. Collins, E.J. Wolfrum, C. D. Broeckling, et al., Non-targeted metabolomics in diverse Sorghum breeding lines indicates primary and secondary metabolite profiles are associated with plant biomass accumulation and photosynthesis, Front. Plant Sci. 7 (2016) 953, https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2016.00953. [3] J. Hong, L. Yang, D. Zhang, J. Shi, Plant metabolomics: an indispensable system biology tool for plant science, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (2016), E767, https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms17060767. [4] W. Wen, D. Li, X. Li, Y. Gao, W. Li, H. Li, et al., Metabolome-based genome-wide association study of maize kernel leads to novel biochemical insights, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 3438, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4438. [5] M. Kusano, K. Saito, Role of metabolomics in crop improvement. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 21 (2012) 24–31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-012-0131-4. [6] V. Daygon, M. Fitzgerald, Application of metabolomics for providing a new generation of selection tools for crop improvement, in: Hot Topics in Metabolomics: Food and Nutrition, Future Science Book Series, Future Science Ltd, 2013, pp. 6–16, https://doi.org/10.4155/ebo.13.458. [7] M.K. Pandey, M. Roorkiwal, V.K. Singh, A. Ramalingam, H. Kudapa, M. Thudi, et al., Emerging genomic tools for legume breeding: current status and future perspectives, Front. Plant Sci. 7 (2016) 455, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00455. [8] O. Fernandez, M. Urrutia, S. Bernillon, C. Giauffret, F. Tardieu, J. Le Gouis, N. Langlade, A. Charcosset, A. Moing, Y. Gibon, Fortune telling: metabolic markers of plant performance, Metabolomics 12 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306016-1099-1. [9] P. Suravajhala, L.J.A. Kogelman, H.N. Kadarmideen, Multi-omic data integration and analysis using systems genomics approaches: methods and applications in animal production, health and welfare, Genet. Sel. Evol. 48 (2016) 38. [10] T. Tohge, A.R. Fernie, Web-based resources for mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics: a user’s guide, Phytochemistry 70 (2009) 450–456. [11] J.M. Hagel, R. Mandal, B. Han, J. Han, D.R. Dinsmore, C.H. Borchers, D. S. Wishart, P.J. Facchini, Metabolome analysis of 20 taxonomically related benzylisoquinoline alkaloid-producing plants, BMC Plant Biol. 15 (2015), https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12870-015-0594-2. [12] J. Martens, J. Grzetic, G. Berden, J. Oomens, Structural identification of electron transfer dissociation products in mass spectrometry using infrared ion spectroscopy, Nat. Commun. 7 (2016) 11754. [13] T. Kind, G. Wohlgemuth, D.Y. Lee, Y. Lu, M. Palazoglu, S. Shahbaz, O. Fiehn, FiehnLib: mass spectral and retention index libraries for metabolomics based on quadrupole and time-of-light gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 10038–10048. [14] H.J. Issaq, Q.N. Van, T.J. Waybright, G.M. Muschik, T.D. Veenstra, Analytical and statistical approaches to metabolomics research, J. Sep. Sci. 32 (2009) 2183–2199, https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200900152. [15] H.J. Klee, M.B. Hayford, K.A. Kretzmer, G.F. Barry, G.M. Kishore, Control of ethylene synthesis by expression of a bacterial enzyme in transgenic tomato plants, Plant Cell 3 (1991) 1187–1193, https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.3.11.1187.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

31

[16] G.G. Harrigan, S. Martino-Catt, K.C. Glenn, Metabolomics, metabolic diversity and genetic variation in crops, Metabolomics 3 (2007) 259–272. [17] M.S.C. Pedras, E.E. Yaya, Dissecting metabolic puzzles through isotope feeding: a novel amino acid in the biosynthetic pathway of the cruciferous phytoalexins rapalexin A and isocyalexin A, Org. Biomol. Chem. 11 (7) (2013) 1149–1166. [18] R.D. Hancock, W.L. Morris, L.J. Ducreux, J.A. Morris, M. Usman, S.R. Verrall, J. Fuller, C.G. Simpson, R. Zhang, P.E. Hedley, et al., Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant to moderately elevated temperature, Plant Cell Environ. 37 (2014) 439–450, https://doi.org/10.1111/ pce.12168. [19] S. Osorio, R. Alba, C.M. Damasceno, G. Lopez-Casado, M. Lohse, M.I. Zanor, et al., Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions, Plant Physiol. 157 (2011) 405–425, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.175463. [20] M. Rocha, L. Sodek, F. Licausi, M.W. Hameed, M.C. Dornelas, J.T. van Dongen, Analysis of alanine aminotransferase in various organs of soybean (Glycine max) and in dependence of different nitrogen fertilisers during hypoxic stress, Amino Acids 39 (2010) 1043–1053, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-010-0596-1. [21] L. Perez-Fons, T. Wells, D.I. Corol, J.L. Ward, C. Gerrish, M.H. Beale, et al., A genome-wide metabolomic resource for tomato fruit from Solanum pennellii, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014) 3859, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03859. [22] R.D. Hall, Plant metabolomics: from holistic hope, to hype, to hot topic, New Phytol. 169 (2006) 453–468. [23] O.A. Hoekenga, Using metabolomics to estimate unintended effects in transgenic crop plants: problems, promises, and opportunities, J. Biomol. Tech. 19 (2008) 159–166. [24] D.I. Ellis, W.B. Dunn, J.L. Griffin, J.W. Allwood, R. Goodacre, Metabolic fingerprinting as a diagnostic tool, Pharmacogenomics 8 (9) (2007) 1243–1266. [25] M.G. Francki, S. Hayton, J. Gummer, C. Rawlinson, R.D. Trengove, Metabolomic profiling and genomic analysis of wheat aneuploid lines to identify genes controlling biochemical pathways in mature grain, Plant Biotechnol. J. 14 (2016) 649–660, https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12410. [26] C. B
enard, S. Bernillon, B. Biais, S. Osorio, M. Maucourt, P. Ballias, C. Deborde, S. Colombi
e, C. Cabasson, D. Jacob, Metabolomic profiling in tomato reveals diel compositional changes in fruit affected by source–sink relationships, J. Exp. Bot. 66 (2015) 3391–3404, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv151. [27] D. Hatoum, C. Annaratone, M.L.A.T.M. Hertog, A.H. Geeraerd, B.M. Nicolai, Targeted metabolomics study of “Braeburn” apples during long-term storage, Postharvest Biol. Technol. 96 (2014) 33–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.05.004. [28] C. Hu, J. Shi, S. Quan, B. Cui, S. Kleessen, Z. Nikoloski, et al., Metabolic variation between japonica and indica rice cultivars as revealed by non-targeted metabolomics, Sci. Rep. 4 (2014)5067https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05067. [29] A.D. Hegeman, Plant metabolomics–meeting the analytical challenges of comprehensive metabolite analysis, Brief. Funct. Genomics 9 (2) (2010) 139–148. [30] U. Roessner, The chemical challenge of the metabolome, in: S.G. Villas-Boas, U. Roessner, M.A.E. Hansen et al., (Eds.), Metabolome Analysis: An Introduction, Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2007, pp. 15–38. [31] U. Roessner, F. Pettolino, The importance of anatomy and physiology in plant metabolomics, Top. Curr. Genet. 18 (2007) 253–278. [32] S. Sato, M. Arita, T. Soga, et al., Time-resolved metabolomics reveals metabolic modulation in rice foliage, BMC Syst. Biol. 2 (2008) 51.

32

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

[33] A.L. Tsai, V. Berka, R.J. Kulmacz, et al., An improved sample packing device for rapid freeze-trap electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy kinetic measurements, Anal. Biochem. 264 (1998) 165–171. [34] T.D. Sharkey, J. Kobza, J.R. Seemann, et al., Reduced cytosolic fructose-1,6bisphosphatase activity leads to loss of oxygen sensitivity in a Flaveria linearis mutant, Plant Physiol. 86 (1988) 667–671. [35] E. Kimball, J.D. Rabinowitz, Identifying decomposition products in extracts of cellular metabolites, Anal. Biochem. 358 (2006) 273–280. [36] E.J. Want, G. O’Maille, C.A. Smith, et al., Solvent-dependent metabolite distribution, clustering, and protein extraction for serum profiling with mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 743–752. [37] S.G. Villas-Boas, J. Hojer-Pedersen, M. Akesson, et al., Global metabolite analysis of yeast: evaluation of sample preparation methods, Yeast 22 (2005) 1155–1169. [38] W. Eisenreich, A. Bacher, Advances of high-resolution NMR techniques in the structural and metabolic analysis of plant biochemistry, Phytochemistry 68 (2007) 2799–2815. [39] I.A. Lewis, S.C. Schommer, B. Hodis, et al., Method for determining molar concentrations of metabolites in complex solutions from two-dimensional 1 H-13C NMR spectra, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 9385–9390. [40] C. Boettcher, E.V. Roepenack-Lahaye, E. Willscher, et al., Evaluation of matrix effects in metabolite profiling based on capillary liquid chromatography electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 1507–1513. [41] T.M. Annesley, Ion suppression in mass spectrometry, Clin. Chem. 49 (2003) 1041–1044. [42] B.D. Bennett, J. Yuan, E.H. Kimball, et al., Absolute quantitation of intracellular metabolite concentrations by an isotope ratio-based approach, Nat. Protoc. 3 (2008) 1299–1311. [43] R. Bakhtiar, T.K. Majumdar, Tracking problems and possible solutions in the quantitative determination of small molecule drugs and metabolites in biological fluids using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 55 (2007) 262–278. [44] J. Tolgyessy, T. Braun, M. Kyrs, Isotope Dilution Analysis, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1972. [45] R.J. Beynon, J.M. Pratt, Metabolic labeling of proteins for proteomics, Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 (2005) 857–872. [46] E. Epstein, J.D. Cohen, R.S. Bandurski, Concentration and metabolic turnover of indoles in germinating kernels of Zea mays L, Plant Physiol. 65 (1980) 415–421. [47] T. Tohge, A.R. Fernie, Web-based resources for massspectrometry-based metabolomics: a user’s guide, Phytochemistry 70 (2009) 450–456. [48] P. Ausloos, C.L. Clifton, S.G. Lias, et al., The critical evaluation of a comprehensive mass spectral library, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 10 (1999) 287–299. [49] N. Schauer, D. Steinhauser, S. Strelkov, et al., GC-MS libraries for the rapid identification of metabolites in complex biological samples, FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 1332–1337. [50] O. Fiehn, Extending the breadth of metabolite profiling by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, Trends Anal. Chem. 27 (2008) 261–269. [51] Q. Cui, I.A. Lewis, A.D. Hegeman, et al., Metabolite identification via the Madison Metabolomics Consortium Database, Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (2008) 162–164. [52] B. Biais, J.W. Allwood, C. Deborde, et al., 1H NMR, GC-EITOFMS, and data set correlation for fruit metabolomics: application to spatial metabolite analysis in melon, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 2884–2894.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

33

[53] S. Moco, B. Schneider, J. Vervoort, Plant micrometabolomics: the analysis of endogenous metabolites present in a plant cell or tissue, J. Proteome Res. 8 (2009) 1694–1703. [54] L.A. McDonnell, R.M.A. Heeren, Imaging mass spectrometry, Mass Spectrom. Rev. 26 (2007) 606–643. [55] R.G. Cooks, Z. Ouyang, Z. Takats, et al., Detection technologies. Ambient mass spectrometry, Science 311 (2006) 1566–1570. [56] M.L. Reyzer, R.M. Caprioli, MALDI-MS-based imaging of small molecules and proteins in tissues, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 11 (2007) 29–35. [57] D.S. Cornett, M.L. Reyzer, P. Chaurand, et al., MALDI imaging mass spectrometry: molecular snapshots of biochemical systems, Nat. Methods 4 (2007) 828–833. [58] Y. Li, B. Shrestha, A. Vertes, Atmospheric pressure infrared MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics, Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 407–420. [59] S. Khatib-Shahidi, M. Andersson, J.L. Herman, et al., Direct molecular analysis of whole-body animal tissue sections by imaging MALDI mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 78 (2006) 6448–6456. [60] Q. Liu, Z. Guo, L. He, Mass spectrometry imaging of small molecules using desorption/ionization on silicon, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 3535–3541. [61] P. Nemes, A.A. Barton, Y. Li, et al., Ambient molecular imaging and depth profiling of live tissue by infrared laser ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem. 80 (2008) 4575–4582. [62] V. Ferna´ndez, P. Guzma´n-Delgado, J. Grac¸a, S. Santos, L. Gil, Cuticle structure in relation to chemical composition: re-assessing the prevailing model. Front. Plant Sci. 7 (2016)427, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00427. [63] A.K. Vadivel, Gel-based proteomics in plants: time to move on from the tradition, Front. Plant Sci. 6 (2015) 369. [64] A.R. Fernie, N. Schauer, Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement? Trends Genet. 25 (2009) 39–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tig.2008.10.010. [65] F.M. Afendi, T. Okada, M. Yamazaki, A. Hirai-Morita, Y. Nakamura, K. Nakamura, et al., KNApSAcK family databases: integrated metabolite-plant species databases for multifaceted plant research. Plant Cell Physiol. 53 (2012), e1, https://doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcr165. [66] B. Parent, C. Hachez, E. Redondo, T. Simonneau, F. Chaumont, F. Tardieu, Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach, Plant Physiol. 149 (2009) 2000–2012, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.130682. [67] C. Simo´, C. Iba´n˜ez, A. Vald
es, A. Cifuentes, V. Garcı´a-Can˜as, Metabolomics of genetically modified crops, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15 (2014) 18941–18966, https://doi. org/10.3390/ijms151018941. [68] E. Mazzucotelli, A. Tartari, L. Cattivelli, G. Forlani, Metabolism of γ-aminobutyric acid during cold acclimation and freezing and its relationship to frost tolerance in barley and wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 57 (2006) 3755–3766, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ erl141. [69] M. Zivy, S. Wienkoop, J. Renaut, C. Pinheiro, E. Goulas, S. Carpentier, The quest for tolerant varieties: the importance of integrating “omics” techniques to phenotyping, Front. Plant Sci. 6 (2015) 448, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00448. [70] V. Arbona, R. Argamasilla, A. Go´mez-Cadenas, Common and divergent physiological, hormonal and metabolic responses of Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila to water and salt stress, J. Plant Physiol. 167 (2010) 1342–1350. [71] C.E. Wong, Y. Li, B.R. Whitty, C. Dı´az-Camino, S.R. Akhter, J.E. Brandle, G. B. Golding, E.A. Weretilnyk, B.A. Moffatt, M. Griffith, Expressed sequence tags from

34

[72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78]

[79] [80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84] [85] [86]

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

the Yukon ecotype of Thellungiella reveal that gene expression in response to cold, drought and salinity shows little overlap, Plant Mol. Biol. 58 (2005) 561–574. Y.P. Lee, A. Babakov, B. de Boer, E. Zuther, D.K. Hincha, Comparison of freezing tolerance, compatible solutes and polyamines in geographically diverse collections of Thellungiella sp. and Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, BMC Plant Biol. 12 (2012) 131. H. Colinet, V. Larvor, M. Laparie, D. Renault, Exploring the plastic response to cold acclimation through metabolomics, Funct. Ecol. 26 (2012) 711–722. M. Korn, T. G€artner, A. Erban, J. Kopka, J. Selbig, D.K. Hincha, Predicting Arabidopsis freezing tolerance and heterosis in freezing tolerance from metabolite composition, Mol. Plant 3 (2010) 224–235. J.H. Widodo Patterson, E. Newbigin, M. Tester, A. Bacic, U. Roessner, Metabolic responses to salt stress of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars, Sahara and clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance, J. Exp. Bot. 60 (2009) 4089–4103. J.L. Moya, A. Go´mez-Cadenas, E. Primo-Millo, M. Talo´n, Chloride absorption in salt-sensitive Carrizo citrange and salt-tolerant Cleopatra mandarin citrus rootstocks is linked to water use, J. Exp. Bot. 54 (2003) 825–833. J. Flexas, Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and nonstomatal limitations revisited, Ann. Bot. 89 (2002) 183–189. M.A. Forner-Giner, M.J. Llosa´, J.L. Carrasco, M.A. Perez-Amador, L. Navarro, G. Ancillo, Differential gene expression analysis provides new insights into the molecular basis of iron deficiency stress response in the citrus rootstock Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf, J. Exp. Bot. 61 (2010) 483–490. E. Sa´nchez-Rodrı´guez, J.M. Ruiz, F. Ferreres, D.A. Moreno, Phenolic profiles of cherry tomatoes as influenced by hydric stress and rootstock technique, Food Chem. 134 (2012) 775–782. J.C. Liu, A.A. Temme, W.K. Cornwell, R.S.P. van Logtestijn, R. Aerts, J.H. C. Cornelissen, Does plant size affect growth responses to water availability at glacial, modern and future CO2 concentrations? Ecol. Res. 31 (2016) 213–227, https://doi. org/10.1007/s11284-015-1330-y. M. Forkel, N. Carvalhais, C. R€ odenbeck, R. Keeling, M. Heimann, K. Thonicke, et al., Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems, Science 351 (2016) 696–699, https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aac4971. S. Kanai, K. Ohkura, J.J. Adu-Gyamfi, P.K. Mohapatra, N.T. Nguyen, H. Saneoka, et al., Depression of sink activity precedes the inhibition of biomass production in tomato plants subjected to potassium deficiency stress, J. Exp. Bot. 58 (2007) 2917–2928, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erm149. G.J. Fitzgerald, M. Tausz, G. O’Leary, M.R. Mollah, S. Tausz-Posch, S. Seneweera, et al., Elevated atmospheric [CO2] can dramatically increase wheat yields in semi-arid environments and buffer against heat waves, Glob. Chang. Biol. 22 (2016) 2269–2284, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13263. A. Bohra, N.P. Singh, Whole genome sequences in pulse crops: a global community resource to expedite translational genomics and knowledge-based crop improvement, Biotechnol. Lett. 37 (2015) 1529–1539, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1836-y. S.B. Idso, K.E. Idso, Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant constituents related to animal and human health, Environ. Exp. Bot. 45 (2001) 179–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00091-5. A. Rogers, Y. Gibon, M. Stitt, P.B. Morgan, C.J. Bernacchi, D.R. Ort, et al., Increased C availability at elevated carbon dioxide concentration improves N assimilation in a legume, Plant Cell Environ. 29 (2006) 1651–1658, https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01549.x.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

35

[87] P. H€ ogy, H. Wieser, P. K€ ohler, K. Schwadorf, J. Breuer, J. Franzaring, et al., Effects of elevated CO2 on grain yield and quality of wheat: results from a 3-year free-air CO2 enrichment experiment, Plant Biol. 11 (2009) 60–69, https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1438-8677.2009.00230. [88] S.K. Yadav, M. Vanaja, P.R. Reddy, N. Jyothilakshmi, M. Maheswari, K.L. Sharma, et al., Effect of elevated CO2 levels on some growth parameters and seed quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.), Indian J. Agric. Biochem. 24 (2) (2011) 158–160. [89] Z. Pan, Y. Li, X. Deng, S. Xiao, Non-targeted metabolomic analysis of orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] Osbeck) wild type and bud mutant fruits by direct analysis in real-time and HPLC-electrospray mass spectrometry, Metabolomics 10 (2014) 508–523, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11306-013-0597-7. [90] A.M. Slisz, A.P. Breksa, D.O. Mishchuk, G. McCollum, C.M. Slupsky, Metabolomic analysis of citrus infection by “Candidatus Liberibacter” reveals insight into pathogenicity, J. Proteome Res. 11 (2012) 4223–4230, https://doi.org/10.1021/pr300350x. [91] A. Wang, J. Yamakake, H. Kudo, Y. Wakasa, Y. Hatsuyama, M. Igarashi, et al., Null mutation of the MdACS3 gene, coding for a ripening-specific 1-aminocyclopropane1-carboxylate synthase, leads to long shelf life in apple fruit, Plant Physiol. 151 (2009) 391–399, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.135822. [92] D. Cuthbertson, P.K. Andrews, J.P. Reganold, N.M. Davies, B.M. Lange, Utility of metabolomics toward assessing the metabolic basis of quality traits in apple fruit with an emphasis on antioxidants, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (2012) 8552–8560, https://doi. org/10.1021/jf3031088. [93] A. Cebulj, V. Cunja, M. Mikulic-Petkovsek, R. Veberic, Importance of metabolite distribution in apple fruit, Sci. Hortic. 214 (2017) 214–220, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.048. [94] S. Nardozza, H.L. Boldingh, S. Osorio, M. H€ ohne, M. Wohlers, A.P. Gleave, et al., Metabolic analysis of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) berries from extreme genotypes reveals hallmarks for fruit starch metabolism, J. Exp. Bot. 64 (2013) 5049–5063, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert293. [95] A. Ainalidou, G. Tanou, M. Belghazi, M. Samiotaki, G. Diamantidis, A. Molassiotis, et al., Integrated analysis of metabolites and proteins reveal aspects of the tissue-specific function of synthetic cytokinin in kiwifruit development and ripening, J. Proteome 143 (2015) 318–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2016.02.013. [96] A. Cuadros-Inostroza, S. Ruı´z-Lara, E. Gonza´lez, A. Eckardt, L. Willmitzer, H. Pen˜a-Cort
es, GC–MS metabolic profiling of Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot cultivars during grapevine berry development and network analysis reveals a stage- and cultivar-dependent connectivity of primary metabolites, Metabolomics 12 (2016) 39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-015-0927-z. [97] A. Aharoni, C.H. De Vos, M. Wein, Z. Sun, R. Greco, A. Kroon, et al., The strawberry FaMYB1 transcription factor suppresses anthocyanin and flavonol accumulation in transgenic tobacco, Plant J. 28 (2001) 319–332, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365313X.2001.01154.x. [98] A. Aharoni, A.P. Giri, F.W.A. Verstappen, C.M. Bertea, R. Sevenier, Z. Sun, et al., Gain and loss of fruit flavor compounds produced by wild and cultivated strawberry species, Plant Cell 16 (2004) 3110–3131, https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.023895. [99] J. Zhang, X. Wang, O. Yu, J. Tang, X. Gu, X. Wan, et al., Metabolic profiling of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) during fruit development and maturation, J. Exp. Bot. 62 (2011) 1103–1118, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq343. [100] E.G. Nagpala, M. Guidarelli, M. Gasperotti, D. Masuero, P. Bertolini, U. Vrhovsek, et al., Polyphenols variation in fruits of the susceptible strawberry cultivar alba during ripening and upon fungal pathogen interaction and possible involvement in unripe fruit tolerance, J. Agric. Food Chem. 64 (2016) 1869–1878, https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b06005.

36

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

[101] M. Eberius, J. Lima-Guerra, High-throughput plant phenotyping-data acquisition, transformation, and analysis, in: D. Edwards, J. Stajich, D. Hansen (Eds.), Bioinformatics, Springer, New York, 2009, pp. 259–278. [102] W.J. Wiser, G.E. Jones, Rapid predigestion technique for automatic analysis of protein in rice and other cereal grains, Cereal Sci. Today 16 (1971) 305. [103] M.S. Bardinskaya, T.A. Shubert, Phenolic compounds of cereals, Biochem. Mosc. 27 (1962) 46. [104] S.D. Tsai, G.W. Tood, Phenolic compounds of wheat leave under drought stress, Phyton Int. J. Exp. Bot. 30 (1972) 67–75. [105] M. Barker, W. Rayens, Partial least squares for discrimination, J. Chemom. 17 (2003) 166–173. [106] L. Tarpley, A.L. Duran, T.H. Kebrom, L.W. Sumner, Biomarker metabolites capturing the metabolite variance present in a rice plant developmental period, BMC Plant Biol. 5 (2005) 8. [107] T. Madhujith, F. Shahidi, Antioxidative and antiproliferative properties of selected barley (Hordeum vulgarae l.) cultivars and their potential for inhibition of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol oxidation, J. Agric. Food Chem. 55 (2007) 5018–5024. [108] R. Amarowicz, Z. Zegarska, R.B. Pegg, M. Karamac, A. Kosinska, Antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of a barley crude extract and its fractions, Czech J. Food Sci. 25 (2007) 73–80. [109] J.A. Vinson, K.M. Erk, S.Y. Wang, J.Z. Marchegiani, M.F. Rose, Total polyphenol antioxidants in whole grain cereals and snacks: surprising sources of antioxidants in the US diet, Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. Soc. 238 (2009) 246. [110] P.S. Thondre, L. Ryan, C.J.K. Henry, Barley β-glucan extracts as rich sources of polyphenols and antioxidants, Food Chem. 126 (2011) 72–77. [111] Y. Okazaki, K. Saito, Integrated metabolomics and phytochemical genomics approaches for studies on rice, Gigascience 5 (2016) 11, https://doi.org/10.1186/ s13742-016-0116-7. [112] Y. Chen, J. Xu, R. Zhang, Z. Abliz, Methods used to increase the comprehensive coverage of urinary and plasma metabolomes by MS, Bioanalysis 8 (2016) 981–997, https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2015-0010. [113] T. Obata, S. Witt, J. Lisec, N. Palacios-Rojas, I. Florez-Sarasa, S. Yousfi, et al., Metabolite profiles of maize leaves in drought, heat and combined stress field trials reveal the relationship between metabolism and grain yield, Plant Physiol. 169 (2015) 2665–2683, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01164. [114] M.C. Shelden, D.A. Dias, N.S. Jayasinghe, A. Bacic, U. Roessner, Root spatial metabolite profiling of two genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) reveals differences in response to short-term salt stress, J. Exp. Bot. 67 (2016) 3731–3745, https://doi. org/10.1093/jxb/erw059. [115] J. Zhang, W. Luo, Y. Zhao, Y. Xu, S. Song, K. Chong, Comparative metabolomic analysis reveals a reactive oxygen species-dominated dynamic model underlying chilling environment adaptation and tolerance in rice, New Phytol. 211 (2016) 1295–1310, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14011. [116] M.T. Caasi-Lit, G.J. Tanner, M. Nayudu, M.I. Whitecross, Isovitexin–2’-O-beta [6O-E-p-coumaroylglucopyranoside] from UV-B irradiated leaves of rice, Oryza sativa L. inhibits fertility of Helicoverpa armigera, Photochem. Photobiol. 83 (2007) 1167–1173. [117] F. Matsuda, Y. Okazaki, A. Oikawa, M. Kusano, R. Nakabayashi, J. Kikuchi, et al., Dissection of genotype-phenotype associations in rice grains using metabolome quantitative trait loci analysis. Plant J. 70 (2012) 624–636, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365313X.2012.04903.x.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

37

[118] D.H. Sanchez, F.L. Pieckenstain, F. Escaray, A. Erban, U. Kraemer, M.K. Udvardi, et al., Comparative ionomics and metabolomics in extremophile and glycophytic Lotus species under salt stress challenge the metabolic pre-adaptation hypothesis, Plant Cell Environ. 34 (2011) 605–617. [119] A. Muscolo, A. Junker, C. Klukas, K. Weigelt-Fischer, D. Riewe, T. Altmann, Phenotypic and metabolic responses to drought and salinity of four contrasting lentil accessions. J. Exp. Bot. 66 (2015) 5467–5480, https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv208. [120] C. Pinheiro, J.A. Passarinho, C.P. Ricardo, Effect of drought and rewatering on the metabolism of Lupinus albusorgans, J. Plant Physiol. 161 (2004) 1203–1210. [121] P. Tripathi, R.C. Rabara, R.N. Reese, M.A. Miller, J.S. Rohila, S. Subramanian, et al., A toolbox of genes, proteins, metabolites and promoters for improving drought tolerance in soybean includes the metabolite coumestrol and stomatal development genes, BMC Genomics 17 (2016) 102, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864016-2420-0. [122] T. Tohge, A.R. Fernie, Metabolomics-inspired insight into developmental, environmental and genetic aspects of tomato fruit chemical composition and quality, Plant Cell Physiol. 56 (2015) 1681–1696, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv093. [123] S. Moco, J. Forshed, R.C.H. De Vos, R.J. Bino, J. Vervoort, Intra- and intermetabolite correlation spectroscopy of tomato metabolomics data obtained by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance, Metabolomics 4 (2008) 202–215, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-008-0112-8. [124] Y. Zhang, G.J. Wang, T.T. Song, et al., Urinary disposition of the soybean isoflavones daidzein, genistein and glycitein differs among humans with moderate fecal isoflavone degradation activity, J. Nutr. 129 (1999) 957–962. [125] J.A. Ross, C.M. Kasum, Dietary flavonoids: bioavailability, metabolic effects, and safety, Annu. Rev. Nutr. 22 (2002) 19–34. [126] P. Snijman, S. Swanevelder, S. Joubert, et al., The antimutagenic activity of the major flavonoids of rooibos (Aspalathus linearis): some dose–response effects on mutagen activation–flavonoid interactions, Mutat. Res. 631 (2007) 111–123. [127] A. Vald
es, C. Simo´, C. Iba´n˜ez, V. Garcı´a-Can˜as, Foodomics strategies for the analysis of transgenic foods, TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 52 (2013) 2–15. [128] A. Oikawa, F. Matsuda, M. Kusano, Y. Okazaki, K. Saito, Rice metabolomics, Rice 1 (2008) 63–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-008-9009-4. [129] J. Zhou, C. Ma, H. Xu, K. Yuan, X. Lu, Z. Zhu, Y. Wu, G. Xu, Metabolic profiling of transgenic rice with cryIAc and sck genes: an evaluation of unintended effects at metabolic level by using GC-FID and GC-MS, J. Chromatogr. B 877 (2009) 725–732. [130] H. Takahashi, M. Hayashi, F. Goto, S. Sato, T. Soga, T. Nishioka, M. Tomita, M. Kawai-Yamada, H. Uchimiya, Evaluation of metabolic alteration in transgenic rice overexpressing dihydroflavonol-4-reductase, Ann. Bot. 98 (2006) 819–825. [131] C. Manetti, C. Bianchetti, L. Casciani, C. Castro, M.E. di Cocco, A. Miccheli, M. Motto, F. Conti, A metabonomic study of transgenic maize (Zea mays) seeds revealed variations in osmolytes and branched amino acids, J. Exp. Bot. 57 (2006) 2613–2625. [132] C. Castro, C. Manetti, A multiway approach to analyze metabonomic data: a study of maize seeds development, Anal. Biochem. 371 (2007) 194–200. [133] J.L. Bernal, M.J. Nozal, L. Toribio, C. Diego, R. Mayo, R. Maestre, Use of supercritical fluid extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to obtain amino acid profiles from several genetically modified varieties of maize and soybean, J. Chromatogr. A 1192 (2008) 266–272. [134] R. Garcı´a-Villalba, C. Leo´n, G. Dinelli, A. Segura-Carretero, A. Ferna´ndezGuti
errez, V. Garcia-Can˜as, A. Cifuentes, Comparative metabolomic study of

38

[135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141]

[142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] [151]

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

transgenic versus conventional soybean using capillary electrophoresis-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, J. Chromatogr. A 1195 (2008) 164–173. Y. Inaba, J.E. Brotherton, A. Ulanov, J.M. Widholm, Expression of a feedback insensitive anthranilate synthase gene from tobacco increases free tryptophan in soybean plants, Plant Cell Rep. 26 (2007) 1763–1771. H.K. Choi, Y.H. Choi, M. Verberne, A.W. Lefeber, C. Erkelens, R. Verpoorte, Metabolic fingerprinting of wild type and transgenic tobacco plants by 1H NMR and multivariate analysis technique, Phytochemistry 65 (2004) 857–864. A.P. Sobolev, D. Capitani, D. Giannino, C. Nicolodi, G. Testone, F. Santoro, G. Frugis, M.A. Iannelli, A.K. Mattoo, E. Brosio, et al., NMR-metabolic methodology in the study of GM foods, Nutrients 2 (2010) 1–15. S. Cha, H. Zhang, H.I. Ilarslan, et al., Direct profiling and imaging of plant metabolites in intact tissues by using colloidal graphite-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry, Plant J. 55 (2008) 348–360. K. Skogerson, G.G. Harrigan, T.L. Reynolds, S.C. Halls, M. Ruebelt, A. Iandolino, A. Pandravada, K.C. Glenn, O. Fiehn, Impact of genetics and environment on the metabolite composition of maize grain, J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 (2010) 3600–3610. J. Nielsen, M.C. Jewett, Topics in Current Genetics, Springer, Berlin; Heidelberg, 2007. J. Van der Greef, E. Davidov, E. Verheij, J. Vogels, R. van der Heijden, A. S. Adourian, et al., G.G. Harrigan, R. Goodacre (Eds.), Metabolic Profiling: Its Role in Biomarker Discovery and Gene Functional Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003. J.K. Nicholson, J. Connelly, J.C. Lindon, E. Holmes, Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1 (2002) 153–161, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd728. H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z.N. Oltvai, A.L. Baraba´si, The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature 407 (2000) 651–654, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/35036627. M. Parter, N. Kashtan, U. Alon, Environmental variability and modularity of bacterial metabolic networks, BMC Evol. Biol. 7 (2007) 169, https://doi.org/10.1186/14712148-7-169. M. Scott, S. Klumpp, E.M. Mateescu, T. Hwa, Emergence of robust growth laws from optimal regulation of ribosome synthesis, Mol. Syst. Biol. 10 (2014) 747, https://doi. org/10.15252/msb.20145379. E.J. O’Brien, J.A. Lerman, R.L. Chang, D.R. Hyduke, B.Ø. Palsson, Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction, Mol. Syst. Biol. 9 (2013) 693, https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2013.52. D. Machado, R.S. Costa, M. Rocha, E.C. Ferreira, B. Tidor, I. Rocha, Modeling formalisms in systems biology, AMB Express 1 (2011) 45, https://doi.org/ 10.1186/2191-0855-1-45. A.S. Blazier, J.A. Papin, Integration of expression data in genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions, Front. Physiol. 3 (2012) 299, https://doi.org/10.3389/ fphys.2012.00299. J.D. Orth, I. Thiele, B.Ø. Palsson, What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28 (2010) 245–248, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1614. A. Varma, B.O. Palsson, Metabolic flux balancing: basic concepts, scientific and practical use, Bio/Technology 12 (1994) 994–998, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1094994. S. Mintz-Oron, A. Aharoni, E. Ruppin, T. Shlomi, Network-based prediction of metabolic enzymes’ subcellular localization, Bioinformatics 25 (2009) i247–i1252, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp209.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

39

[152] S.A. Becker, B.O. Palsson, Context-specific metabolic networks are consistent with experiments, PLoS Comput. Biol. 4 (2008) e1000082, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000082. [153] K. Yizhak, T. Benyamini, W. Liebermeister, E. Ruppin, T. Shlomi, Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model, Bioinformatics 26 (2010) i255–i260, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/ btq183. [154] R. Rios-Estepa, B.M. Lange, Experimental and mathematical approaches to modeling plant metabolic networks. Phytochemistry 68 (2007) 2351–2374, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.04.021. [155] R. Mahadevan, C.H. Schilling, The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraintbased genome-scale metabolic models, Metab. Eng. 5 (2003) 264–276, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09.002. [156] J.E. Cuthrell, L.T. Biegler, On the optimization of differential- algebraic process systems, AICHE J. 33 (1987) 1257–1270, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690330804. [157] R.Y. Luo, S. Liao, G.Y. Tao, Y.Y. Li, S. Zeng, X.Y. Li, et al., Dynamic analysis of optimality in myocardial energy metabolism under normal and ischemic conditions, Mol. Syst. Biol. 2 (2006)2006.0031https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100071. [158] M. Krauss, S. Schaller, S. Borchers, R. Findeisen, J. Lippert, L. Kuepfer, Integrating cellular metabolism into a multiscale whole-body model, PLoS Comput. Biol. 8 (2012) e1002750, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002750. [159] R. Luo, H. Wei, L. Ye, K. Wang, F. Chen, L. Luo, et al., Photosynthetic metabolism of C3 plants shows highly cooperative regulation under changing environments: a systems biological analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 (2009) 847–852, https:// doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810731105. [160] S. Kleessen, Z. Nikoloski, Dynamic regulatory on/off minimization for biological systems under internal temporal perturbations, BMC Syst. Biol. 6 (2012) 16, https://doi. org/10.1186/1752-0509-6-16. [161] T. Shlomi, O. Berkman, E. Ruppin, Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 7695–7700, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406346102. [162] S. Kleessen, S. Irgang, S. Klie, P. Giavalisco, Z. Nikoloski, Integration of transcriptomics and metabolomics data specifies Chlamydomonas’ metabolic response to rapamycin treatment, Plant J. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12763 (Epub ahead of print). [163] E. Grafahrend-Belau, A. Junker, A. Eschenr€ oder, J. M€ uller, F. Schreiber, B.H. Junker, Multiscale metabolic modeling: dynamic flux balance analysis on a whole-plant scale, Plant Physiol. 163 (2013) 637–647, https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.224006. [164] H.-G. Holzh€ utter, The principle of flux minimization and its application to estimate stationary fluxes in metabolic networks, Eur. J. Biochem. 271 (2004) 2905–2922, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04213.x. [165] C.S. Henry, L.J. Broadbelt, V. Hatzimanikatis, Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis, Biophys. J. 92 (2007) 1792–1805, https://doi.org/10.1529/ biophysj.106.093138. [166] N. Tepper, E. Noor, D. Amador-Noguez, H.S. Haraldsdo´ttir, R. Milo, J. Rabinowitz, et al., Steady-state metabolite concentrations reflect a balance between maximizing enzyme efficiency and minimizing total metabolite load, PLoS ONE 8 (2013)e75370https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075370. [167] E. Noor, H.S. Haraldsdo´ttir, R. Milo, R.M.T. Fleming, Consistent estimation of Gibbs energy using component contributions, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9 (2013) e1003098, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003098.

40

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

[168] B.K.S. Chung, D.-Y. Lee, Flux-sum analysis: a metabolite-centric approach for understanding the metabolic network, BMC Syst. Biol. 3 (2009) 117, https://doi. org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-117. [169] M.N. Simons, R. Saha, N. Amiour, A. Kumar, L. Guillard, G. Cl
ement, et al., Assessing the metabolic impact of nitrogen availability using a compartmentalized maize leaf genome-scale model, Plant Physiol. 166 (2014) 1659–1674, https://doi.org/10.1104/ pp.114.245787. [170] A.M. Feist, B.O. Palsson, The biomass objective function, Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13 (2010) 344–349, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2010.03.003. [171] C.S. Henry, M. DeJongh, A.A. Best, P.M. Frybarger, B. Linsay, R.L. Stevens, Highthroughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models, Nat. Biotechnol. 28 (2010) 977–982, https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1672. [172] B. Teusink, et al., In silico reconstruction of the metabolic pathways of Lactobacillus plantarum: comparing predictions of nutrient requirements with those from growth experiments, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 (2005) 7253–7262. [173] A.M. Feist, et al., Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7 (2009) 129–143. [174] R. Breitling, et al., New surveyor tools for charting microbial metabolic maps, Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6 (2008) 156–161. [175] C. Francke, et al., Reconstructing the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome, Trends Microbiol. 13 (2005) 550–558. [176] D.W. Tempest, O.M. Neijssel, The status of YATP and maintenance energy as biologically interpretable phenomena, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 38 (1984) 459–486. [177] P.A. Vanrolleghem, J.J. Heijnen, A structured approach for selection among candidate metabolic network models and estimation of unknown stoichiometric coefficients, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 58 (1998) 133–138. [178] M.A. Oberhardt, et al., Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions, Mol. Syst. Biol. 5 (2009) 320. [179] G. Singh, K.G. Mukerji, Root exudates as determinant of rhizospheric microbial biodiversity, in: K.G. Mukerji, C. Manoharachary, J. Singh (Eds.), Microbial Activity in the Rhizosphere, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 39–53. [180] V. Gewin, An underground revolution, Nature 466 (2010) 552–553. [181] H.P. Bais, T.L. Weir, L.G. Perry, S. Gilroy, J.M. Vivanco, The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57 (2006) 233–266. [182] H. Marschner, V. Romheld, In vivo measurement of root induced changes at the soilroot interface: effect of plant species and nitrogen source, Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 111 (1983) 241–251. [183] R.P. DICK, A review: long-term effects of agricultural systems on soil biochemical and microbial parameters, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 40 (1992) 25–36. [184] E.A. Paul, F.E. Clark, Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry, Academic Press, San Diego, 1996, 340. [185] G. Berg, C. Zachow, H. M€ uller, J. Philipps, R. Tilcher, Next-generation bioproducts sowing the seeds of success for sustainable agriculture, Agronomy 3 (2013) 648–656, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3040648. [186] S. Cesco, G. Neumann, N. Tomasi, R. Pinton, L. Weisskopf, Release of plant-borne flavonoids into the rhizosphere and their role in plant nutrition, Plant Soil 329 (2010) 1–25. [187] M. Maclean, An Investigation Into the Light Inactivation of Medically Important Microorganisms, (Ph.D. thesis), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 2006.

Metabolomics for crop improvement: Quality and productivity

41

[188] P.G. Dennis, A.J. Miller, P.R. Hirsch, Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72 (3) (2010) 313–327. [189] R.L. Nicholson, S.S. Kollipara, J.R. Vincent, P.C. Lyons, G. CadenaGomez, Phytoalexin synthesis by the sorghum mesocotyl in response to infection by pathogenic and nonpathogenic fungi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84 (1987) 5520–5524. [190] A. Lanoue, V. Burlat, G.J. Henkes, I. Koch, U. Schurr, U.S.R. R€ ose, De novo biosynthesis of defense root exudates in response to Fusarium attack in barley, New Phytol. 185 (2010) 577–588. [191] M. Bressan, M.A. Roncato, F. Bellvert, G. Comte, F. el Zahar Haichar, W. Achouak, O. Berge, Exogenous glucosinolate produced by Arabidopsis thaliana has an impact on microbes in the rhizosphere and plant roots, ISME J. 3 (2009) 1243–1257. [192] R.W. Nicol, L. Yousef, J.A. Traquair, M.A. Bernards, Ginsenosides stimulate the growth of soilborne pathogens of American ginseng, Phytochemistry 64 (2003) 257–264. [193] C. Bertin, X. Yang, L.A. Weston, The role of root exudates and allelochemicals in the rhizosphere, Plant Soil 256 (2003) 67–83. [194] G.L. Mark, J.M. Dow, P.D. Kiely, H. Higgins, J. Haynes, C. Baysse, A. Abbas, T. Foley, A. Franks, J. Morrissey, Transcriptome profiling of bacterial responses to root exudates identifies genes involved in microbe-plant interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005) 17454–17459. [195] J. Yao, C. Allen, Chemotaxis is required for virulence and competitive fitness of the bacterial wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, J. Bacteriol. 188 (2006) 3697–3708. [196] E.M. Estabrook, J.I. Yoder, Plant-plant communications: rhizosphere signaling between parasitic angiosperms and their hosts, Plant Physiol. 116 (1998) 1–7. [197] C. Hua, Y. Wang, X. Zheng, D. Dou, Z. Zhang, F. Govers, A Phytophthora sojae G-protein α subunit is involved in chemotaxis to soybean isoflavones, Eukaryot. Cell 7 (2008) 2133–2140. [198] N. Tomasi, L. Weisskopf, G. Renella, L. Landi, R. Pinton, Z. Varanini, P. Nannipieri, J. Torrent, E. Martinoia, S. Cesco, Flavonoids of white lupin roots participate in phosphorus mobilization from soil, Soil Biol. Biochem. 40 (2008) 1971–1974. [199] L.A. Weston, U. Mathesius, Flavonoids: their structure, biosynthesis and role in the rhizosphere, including allelopathy, J. Chem. Ecol. 39 (2013) 283–297. [200] C.S. Tang, C.C. Young, Collection and identification of allelopathic compounds from the undisturbed root system of bigalta limpograss (Hemarthria altissima), Plant Physiol. 69 (1982) 155–160. [201] J.Q. Yu, Y. Matsui, Effects of root exudates of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) and allelochemicals on ion uptake by cucumber seedlings, J. Chem. Ecol. 23 (1997) 817–827. [202] D. Tilman, K.G. Cassman, P.A. Matson, R. Naylor, S. Polasky, Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices, Nature 418 (2002) 671–677. [203] M. Watt, J. Kirkegaard, J. Passioura, Rhizosphere biology and crop productivity—a review, Soil Res. 44 (2006) 299–317. [204] J. Shen, C. Li, G. Mi, L. Li, L. Yuan, R. Jiang, F. Zhang, Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China, J. Exp. Bot. 64 (2013) 1181–1192. [205] B.A. Hense, C. Kuttler, J. M€ uller, M. Rothballer, A. Hartmann, J.U. Kreft, Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5 (2007) 230–239. [206] U. Mathesius, M. Watt, Rhizosphere signals for plant-microbe interactions: implications for field-grown plants, in: U.E. L€ uttge, W. Beyschlag (Eds.), Progress in Botany, vol. 72, Springer, Berlin, 2011, pp. 125–161.

42

Sustainable agriculture: Advances in plant metabolome and microbiome

Further reading [207] M. Murakami, M. Ashikari, K. Miura, T. Yamashino, T. Mizuno, The evolutionarily conserved OsPRR quintet: rice pseudo-response regulators implicated in circadian rhythm, Plant Cell Physiol. 44 (2003) 1229–1236, https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/ pcg135. [208] P. Giavalisco, K. Kohl, J. Hummel, et al., 13C isotope-labeled metabolomes allowing for improved compound annotation and relative quantification in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolomic research, Anal. Chem. 81 (2009) 6546–6551. [209] A.D. Hegeman, C.F. Schulte, Q. Cui, et al., Stable isotope assisted assignment of elemental compositions for metabolomics, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 6912–6921. [210] T. Kind, O. Fiehn, Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm, BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 234. [211] J.L. Little, Artifacts in trimethylsilyl derivatization reactions and ways to avoid them, J. Chromatogr. A 844 (1999) 1–22. [212] T.R. Sana, J.C. Roark, X. Li, et al., Molecular formula and METLIN personal metabolite database matching applied to the identification of compounds generated by LC/ TOF-MS, J. Biomol. Tech. 19 (2008) 258–266. [213] J.L. Guerquin-Kern, T.D. Wu, C. Quintana, et al., Progress in analytical imaging of the cell by dynamic secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS microscopy), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1724 (2005) 228–238. [214] H. Zhang, S. Cha, E.S. Yeung, Colloidal graphite-assisted laser desorption/ionization MS and MSn of small molecules. 2. Direct profiling and MS imaging of small metabolites from fruits, Anal. Chem. 79 (2007) 6575–6584. [215] M.F. Lo´pez-Climent, V. Arbona, R.M. P
erez-Clemente, A. Go´mez-Cadenas, Effects of cadmium on gas exchange and phytohormone contents in citrus, Biol. Plant. 55 (2011) 187–190. [216] S. Komatsu, A. Yamamoto, T. Nakamura, M.Z. Nouri, Y. Nanjo, K. Nishizawa, et al., Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomics techniques, J. Proteome Res. 10 (2011) 3993–4004, https://doi.org/10.1021/pr2001918. [217] B.D. Sahu, A.K. Kalvala, M. Koneru, et al., Ameliorative effect of fisetin on cisplatininduced nephrotoxicity in rats via modulation of NF-κB activation and antioxidant defence, PLoS ONE 9 (2014) e105070. [218] L. Jerby, T. Shlomi, E. Ruppin, Computational reconstruction of tissue-specific metabolic models: application to human liver metabolism, Mol. Syst. Biol. 6 (2010) 401, https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2010.56. [219] D. Segre`, D. Vitkup, G.M. Church, Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99 (2002) 15112–15117, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232349399. [220] I.M. Keseler, C. Bonavides-Martinez, J. Collado-Vides, S. Gama-Castro, R. P. Gunsalus, D.A. Johnson, et al., EcoCyc: a comprehensive view of E. coli biology, Nucleic Acids Res. 37 (2009) D464–D470. [221] M.W. Covert, et al., Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks, Nature 429 (2004) 92–96. [222] A.W. Decho, et al., Chemical challenges to bacterial AHL signaling in the environment, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 86–99. [223] X. Zhuang, J. Chen, H. Shim, Z. Bai, New advances in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for bioremediation, Environ. Int. 33 (2007) 406–413.