Metal derivatives of amidoximes V. Dialkyl- or diphenyl-silyl derivatives of amidoximes

Metal derivatives of amidoximes V. Dialkyl- or diphenyl-silyl derivatives of amidoximes

327 Journal of Organometallic 0 Elsevier Sequoia METAL Chemishy. S.A., Lauaanne DERIVATIVES V. DLALKYL- A.B. GOEL Chemishy 85 (1975) 327-3...

338KB Sizes 0 Downloads 19 Views

327

Journal

of Organometallic

0 Elsevier Sequoia

METAL

Chemishy.

S.A., Lauaanne

DERIVATIVES

V. DLALKYL-

A.B. GOEL

Chemishy

85 (1975)

327-333

- Printed in The Netherlands

OF AMIDOXIMES

OR DI?HENYLSlLYL

DERIVATIVES

OF AMiDO?UMES

and V.D. GUF’TA

Department.

(Received September

Ralasthan

University,

Jaipur 302004

(India)

3rd, 1974)

Summary New monomeric dialkyl- or diphenyl-silyibisamidoximes and dialkyl(ethosy)silylamidoximes have been characterised. Their infrared spectra have been interpreted and diamagnetic susceptibility of some of them has been determined.

Introduction Apart from analytical applications, metal compleses of amidoximes [l] have received very little attention. Studies on metal derivatives of amidoximes, R’(H,N)C=N-OH, have been initiated by us recently [ 2-51, and in continuation of our Li~estigations on organosilicon derivatives, we report here the synthesis and properties of some new dialkyl- or diphenyl-silylbisamidoximes and dialkyl(ethoxy)silyiamidosimes.

Results and discussion Dial!@- or diphenyl-diethoxysilanes were refluxed with the amidoximes in l/2 molar ratio in benzene, in the presence of a small amount of sodium. The progress of the reaction was checked by estimating the liberated ethanol. I

R,Si(OEt),

a, b, c, d,

+ 2 R’C(NH,)=NOH

-9

R.$i[ON=C(R’)NH,], (1)

R = Me, R’ R = Me, R’ R = Me, R’ R = Me, R’

= Me Et = Pr = Ph =

e, R = Ph, R’ = Et f, R = Ph, R’ = Pr g, R=Ph,R’=Ph

+ 2 EtOH

328

Attempted preparation of mono-derivatives by carrying out the reactions in equimolar proportions invariably resulted in bis-products (I). These results are consistent with earlier findings [5,6] that, in contrast, the dialkyldichlorosilanes reacted readily with amidosimes in equimolar ratio in the presence of triethylamine

resulting in the formation of cyclic derivatives, RISi

/ON\CR.

\ N’ [4]. However, the mono-products (II) could be obtained by treating dialkyl(ethoxy)chlorosilanes, R2Si(OEt)CI, with amidosimes in the presence of triethylamine: &Si(OEt)Cl

+ R’C(NH?)=NOH

+ Et-,N%

R,Si(OEt)ON=C(R’)NH,

(11) a, b, c, d,

R R R R

= = = =

Me, Me, Me, Me,

R’ R’ R’ R’

= = = =

Me Et Pr Ph

+ Et3N - HCI

e, R = Et, R’ = Et f, R = Et, R’ = Pr

All mono- (II) and bis- (I) derivatives are monomeric (Tables 1 and 2).

in refluxing benzene

Infrared spectra The v(OH) observed at 3570-3650 cm-’ in the parent amidoximes

[ 71 disappear in compounds I and II and two strong bands in the regions 3455-3475 cm-’ and 3320-3360 cm-’ due to ZJ(NH,) and its deformation at 1575 c 5 cm-’ are present, suggesting that the products are O-substituted. An intense band in the region 1640-1652 cm-’ can be assigned to v(C=N) of the osime moiety. In clialkylsilyl products, the vibrations of the & group on silicon show characteristic bands [8, 91, at ca. 805 and 840-850 cm-’ due to v,(Si-C) and methyl rocking along with the 6,(Me) at ca. 1255 cm-’ and 6,(Et) at ca. 1238 cm-‘. Absorption bands at 1070-1110 cm-’ with two or three split band groups characteristic of cg,(Si-O-C), (S+O-N) and v(C-0) frequencies have been observed in both mono- (II) and his- (I) products. A medium to strong band at 935 5 12 cm-’ is due to z~(N-0) and at 720-735 cm-’ is assigned to vJSi-0). The positions of v(Si--C), ~(Si-0) in comparison to dialkyldiethorysilane [ 10, 111, and v(NH~) with respect to parent amidoxime [ 21 are almost unchanged, indicating the absence of any intramolecular coordination (Si-N) [ 121. PMR spectra The PMR spectra of Ilb gave two multiplets due to methylene protons of ethosy and ethyl groups each of which splits into two sets of quartets at T 6.14, 6.20 and 7 7.79, 7.84 respectively, suggesting the presence of some isomeric forms. Methyl protons could be distinguished at r 8.82 (ethory) and 8.97 (ethyl). The presence of isomers is also indicated by three closely spaced signals (r 9.80, 9.91 and 9.97) due to Me,Si protons. Methylene (two multiplets), methyl and Me,Si protons are observed in the ratio l/1/3/3. The most likely

Ib

Et 1.92 Pr 1.77 Ph 2.33

M0

Ill

36

38

If

PK

Ph 1.27

37

Ie

EL 0.96

Ph 1.27

38

Id

0.74

40

IC

Ph 1.46 Ph 0.99

1.63 Me 1.2Q Me 1.27

42

In

Me 2.06

Me 2.07 39

fh)

Reoctlon tlnlc

R’(HlN)C=N-OH R’

Product

Crystd. from hot benzene Cryetd. from hot benzene

Crystd. from hot bcnzcnc

7910.1

6810.1

12810.1

B.P. (DC/mm)

Ilqutd

0.40

(0.44)

(94)

0.46 (0.49) 0.30 (0.33)

0.06 (1.00) 0.76 (0.00) 0.76 (0.79)

1.22 (1.28)

Elhnnol In nzeotrope (B)

6.12 (6.20)

(7.30)

7.81 (7.88) 7.24

12.04 (12.09) 10.68 (10.78) 6.46 (8.66)

13.72 (13.76)

SI (sb)

Analysis found (c&d.)

Whlw solld

(88)

(98) Whlta eolld

Vkous

(92)

(80) Whtto solid

(84) Colourlens Ilquld

(8b) Colourlebs liquid

White crystn. solid

Nnturc and yield (‘F)

AND ANALYSES OF DIMETHYL- AND DIPHENYL~SILYLBISAMIDOXIMES

R@(OEL)Z R

Reoctnnte (g)

PREPARATION

TABLE 1

12.30 (12.36)

lB.60 (16.71) 14.60 (14.67)

24.06 (24.12) 21.60 (21.61) 17.01 (17.00)

29.20 (29.38)

N (%I

460 (462.6)

387 (366.6) 389 (384.6)

248 (232.3) 276 (260.4) 327 (328.6)

264 (204.3)

Mol. wt. found (cnlcd.)

1.4630

1.4495

I, JS D

R’(H2N)C=N-OH R’

hlo

0.60 El 0.74 Pr 0.87

Ph

1.17 EI 0.68 PI 0.60

Ma

1.13 Me 1.17 Mtl 1.18

Me

1.10 Et 1.10 Et 1.08 0.00

0.72

0.00

0.87

0.80

0.84

EcjN

a AU the products nre colourlesa Ilqulde wewcd

R

R~WOEtlCI

Rcnatants (8)

Reuctlon

30 min

30 min

26 mln

26 mln

30 mln

lh

LlrnC

nt room tompernture.

III

Ik

Hd

IIC

IIb

Iln

Product

PREPARATION AND ANALYSES OI: DIALKYL(ETHOXY)SlLYLAMIDOXlhlES~

TABLE 2

7410.7

7311.0

6710.2

8710.1

8610.1

14010.2

-

B.P, (“C/mm)

86

66

78

86

88

80

Yluld 04

15.80 (lG.92) 14.66 (14.76) 13.04 (13.7G) 11.70 (11.70) 12.77 (12.86) 12.01 112.08)

SI

16.81 (lB.UD) 14.70 (14.72) 13.71 (13.72) 11.72 (11.76) 12.78 (12.82) 12.02 (12.06)

N

160 (176.3) 107 (100.3) 211 (204.3) 233 (238.4) 237 (218A) 230 (232.6)

(enled. )

hnnlyslo found kulcd.)(%) hlol. wt. found

1.4515

1.4616

-

1.4466

1.4466

1.4470

ng

0

w w

331 TABLE

3

DIAMAGNETIC SlJSCEPTlBILITY DlhlETHYL(ETAOXY)SILYLAMlDOXlhlE~ Compound

(R’)

DATA

FOR

DIMETHYLSiLYLBISAMIDOXlMES

xhl observed

% Difference between observed calculated XM

ib (Et) Ic (R)

124.4 146.9 169.4

-4.8 -4.4 -3.7

Ila (Me) .lrn (Et) Ilc (PI)

113.4 124.5 135.8

-3.6 -3.5 -3.2

La (Me)

a lo+

AND

and

C.&s. umts.

isomers are syn and anti forzns for which evidence has been gathered in the PMR data of trimethylsilylamidoxime

Diamagnetic

[ 21.

suscep tibrlity

A wave-mechanical

method using the concept of bond susceptibiliky has been used [ 13,141. The esperimentally determined values and the percentage difference between observed and calculated diamagnetic susceptibilities of the compounds have been summarised in Table 3.

The values reported (Table 3) have been treated graphically for each individual series by plotting molar susceptibility against the length of the alkyl chains in the homologous compounds. Both plots were linear and the information obtained from them for each series is given in Table 4. xsi have been calculated using the standard x values of different groups [14-161. The lower values of Gi (17.90 and 17.85) for both series (Table 4) in comparison with h for the S-C system (reported to be 21.00 for tetra-compounds [ 17 1) are explainable by “back-bonding” to the silicon atom from the oxygen lone-pair. These observations are consistent with the data of Abel et al. [171. TABLE VALUES CENTRAL Senes

4 OF THE METAL

DIAhlAGNETIC ATOM IN THE Gradient plot

of

SUSCEPTIBILITIES SERIES STUDIED

OF THE

METHYLENE

XCH?

.%&I

11.25 11.20

100.4 101.7

GROUPS

intercept

AND

THE

Xsi

Xp%q againsr n 1 I1

11.25 11.20

17.90 17.86

332

Experimental Experimental details and analytical methods are as described in an earlier report [ 51. Freshly distilled dimethyldiethoxysilane (113.8”) and diphenyldiethoxysilane (151-153”/6.0 mm) were used. Dimethyl(ethoxy)chlorosihme (95-96’) and diethyl(ethoxy)chIorosilane (146-147”) were prepared [ 181 and distilled before use. Amidoximes were synthesized by the standard methods 11,191. Infrared spectra were recorded on neat samples or on nujol mulls, using KBr optics (Perkin-Elmer 337) in the range 4000400 cm-‘. Molecular weights were determined in refluxing benzene in a semi-micro (Gallenkamp) ebulliometer. Refractive indices were determined with an Abbe retiactometer. The PMR spectrum was run on a Varian A-60 in CCI, using TMS as internal standard. All diamagnetic susceptibility measurements have been carried out at room temperature (26”) by the Gouy method. Benzene was used as a reference liquid having specific susceptibility -0.702 X 10m6c.g.s. units. The accuracy of the determination of the Gouy force was of the order of f. 0.05 mg. Reaction between dimethylor diphenyl-diethoxysilane and amidoxime (molar ratio l/2) Dimethyl- or diphenyl-diethorysilane and the appropriate amidoxime were added to anhydrous benzene (ca. 50 ml). A small piece of metallic sodium was added and the reaction mixture was retlured and the ethanol Liberated was fractionated azeotropically with benzene for ca. 30-40 h. Solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was distilled in vacua or crystallized to give the product. The details are given in Table 1. Reactions of dialkylchloroethoxysilanes with amidoximes in the presence of triethylamrne (molar ratio l/l/l) To the amidoxime in benzene (ca. 40 ml), triethylamine and dialkylchloroethoxysikme were added. The mivture was stirred at room temperature for ca. l/2 h and filtered. The solvent was removed and the residue on distillation in vacua gave the product. Results are collected in Table 2. Acknowledgements Thanks are due to Prof. R-C. Mehrotra and Prof. K.C. Joshi for providing the laboratory facilities. One of us (A.B.G.) is grateful to the C.S.I.R., New Delhi for the award of a Junior Research Fellowship. References 1 F. Elog and R. Leaaers. Chem. Rev.. 62 (1962) 155. Gupta. J. Organomehl. Chem.. 72 (1974) 3 A.B. Gael and V.D. Gupta. J. OrganometaL Chem.. 77 (1974) 4 A-B. Gael and V.D. Gupta. Aust. J. Chem.. (1974) in p5 kB. Gael d V.D. Gupta Indirs J. Cbem.. (1974) in press_ 6 E. -II. Acts Chem. Scan&. 8 (1954) 898. 7 L. Brandt. Meded. Vlaam. Chem. Vu.. 29 (1967) 57.

2 -4-R Goel and V.D.

171. 183.

333 8 E.W.

Abel

9

Coltbup.

10 11 12 13

14 15 16 17 18 19

N.B.

and R.P. Bush. J. Organometal. L-H.

Daly

and

SE.

Wiberley.

C&m..

3 (1965)

Introduction

245. to Infrared

and Raman

Spectroscopy.

Press. London. 1964. R. Forneris and E. Funk 2. Electmcbem.. 62 (1958) 1130. T. Tanaka, Bull. Chem. Sot. Jap.. 33 (1960) 446. R.C. hlehrotra and P. Baja~. J. Organomet-al. Cbem.. 24 (1970) 611. J. Baudet. J. Cbim. Phys.. 58 (1961) 228. A. Pacault. J. Hoarau and A. Mar&and. Advances III Chemical f%yslcs. hterscmm. New York, 1961. p. 171. YaG. Dorfman. Duunagnetisn and Cheoucal bond. EJsewer. New York. 1965. P. 24. W.R. rsPguq G.I.W. Lleweiyn and G. Scott. Tranr Faraday Sot.. 55 (1959) 887. E.W. Abel. R.P. Bush. C.R. Jenkinsand T. Zobel. Trans. Faraday Sot.. 60 (1964) 1214. L.W. Breed. J.W. Hageer~y Jr. and F. Biuoccbi. J. 0%. Chcm.. 25 (1960) 1633. J. Banaos. R. hlarhrs-Noel and F. Maths, C.R. Acad. Sci Paris. 245 (1957) 419.

Acad

,dC