Methyl anthranilate: A novel quorum sensing inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria

Methyl anthranilate: A novel quorum sensing inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria

Journal Pre-proof Methyl anthranilate: a novel quorum sensing inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria Tingting Li, Xiaojia Sun, Hait...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 23 Views

Journal Pre-proof Methyl anthranilate: a novel quorum sensing inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria Tingting Li, Xiaojia Sun, Haitao Chen, Binbin He, Yongchao Mei, Dangfeng Wang, Jianrong Li PII:

S0740-0020(19)30966-9

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103356

Reference:

YFMIC 103356

To appear in:

Food Microbiology

Received Date: 10 July 2019 Revised Date:

20 September 2019

Accepted Date: 23 October 2019

Please cite this article as: Li, T., Sun, X., Chen, H., He, B., Mei, Y., Wang, D., Li, J., Methyl anthranilate: a novel quorum sensing inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria, Food Microbiology, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103356. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1

Methyl anthranilate: a novel quorum sensing inhibitor and

2

anti-biofilm agent against Aeromonas sobria

3

Tingting Lia, Xiaojia Sunb, Haitao Chenc, Binbin Heb, Yongchao Meib,

4

DangfengWangb, Jianrong Li b*,

5

a

6

University), Ministry of Education, Dalian, Liaoning, 116600. China

7

b

8

Liaoning Province; National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Storage,

9

Processing and Safety Control Technology for Fresh Agricultural and Aquatic

Key Laboratory of Biotechnology and Bioresources Utilization (Dalian Minzu

College of Food Science and Technology, Bohai University; Food Safety Key Lab of

10

Products; Jinzhou, Liaoning, 121013, China

11

c

12

University (BTBU), Beijing 100048, China

Beijing Key Laboratory of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

*Correspondence:

22

Professor Jianrong Li, College of Food Science and Technology, Bohai University,

23

Jinzhou, Liaoning, China. Tel: +86-416-3400008; Email: [email protected] 1

24

Abstract: Quorum sensing (QS), bacterial cell-to-cell communication, is a gene regulatory

25

mechanism that regulates virulence potential and biofilm formation in many pathogens.

26

Aeromonas sobria, a common aquaculture pathogen, was isolated and identified by our laboratory

27

from the deteriorated turbot, and its potential for virulence factors and biofilm production was

28

regulated by QS system. In view of the interference with QS system, this study was aimed to

29

investigate the effect of methyl anthranilate at sub-Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (sub-MICs)

30

on QS-regulated phenotypes in A. sobria. The results suggested that 0.5 µL/mL of methyl

31

anthranilate evidently reduced biofilm formation (51.44%), swinging motility (74.86%), swarming

32

motility (71.63%), protease activity (43.08%), and acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) production.

33

Furthermore, the real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and in silico analysis showed that methyl

34

anthranilate might inhibit QS system in A. sobria by interfering with the biosynthesis of AHL, as

35

well as competitively binding with receptor protein. Therefore, our data indicated the feasibility of

36

methyl anthranilate as a promising QS inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent for improving food safety.

37 38

Keywords: Aeromonas sobria; Biofilm formation; Foodborne pathogen; Methyl anthranilate;

39

Quorum sensing

40 41

1. Introduction

42

Aeromonas sobria is a Gram-negative, highly active, facultative anaerobic bacterium of the

43

family Aeromonadaceae (Janda and Abbott, 2010). It is a common zoonotic pathogen, can cause

44

furunculosis and septicemia in fish, as well as gastroenteritis and wound infection in humans.

45

Meanwhile, as a emerging foodborne pathogen, its virulence secretion and biofilm formation

2

46

caused serious food safety problems, and considerable economic loss in food industry (Chen et al.,

47

2013; Nagar et al., 2011). Recently, some studies have found that the expression of virulence

48

factors and biofilm formation of A. sobria are regulated by quorum sensing (QS) system

49

(Beaz-Hidalgo and Figueras, 2013; Kirov et al., 2004).

50

QS is a system in which bacterial cells communicate with each other to monitor the changes

51

in their population density through signal molecules (called autoinducers, AIs), and activate

52

specific sets of genes when a threshold is reached (Whiteley et al., 2017). Among them,

53

acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL) are the most common autoinducers of Gram-negative bacteria

54

(Papenfort and Bassler, 2016). LuxI/R-type QS system was the model system in Gram- negative

55

bacteria, containing two integrators, AHL synthase (I-protein), encoded by LuxI homologue

56

synthase, and a cognate receptor (R-protein), activated by AHL, which have been shown to

57

regulate multiplex phenotypic characteristics, such as expression of virulence factors and biofilm

58

formation (Ng and Bassler, 2009; Parsek and Greenberg, 2005; Rutherford and Bassler, 2012).

59

Recently, many studies have focused on interfering bacterial QS system with natural compounds,

60

known as QS inhibitors (QSIs), due to the ability of reducing virulence, and not imposing strong

61

selective pressures on development (Defoirdt, 2018).

62

Plant food extracts are commonly considered as attractive sources of anti-QS compounds,

63

due to their capacity to interfere with QS system, and many studies have reported that there are

64

three different ways to modulate QS of Gram-negative bacteria, by inhibition of AHL synthesis,

65

by degrading signaling molecules, and by targeting the signal receptor, LuxR (Defoirdt et al., 2013;

66

Truchado et al., 2009; Truchado et al., 2015). Methyl anthranilate, a plant spice extract, occurs

67

naturally in grapes and strawberries, and has been widely employed for the preparation of edible

3

68

flavor and food additives in food processing industries. It has been reported that biofilm formation

69

and elastase activity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa were significantly inhibited after treatment with

70

methyl anthranilate and its analogues (Calfee et al., 2001; Li et al., 2018). However, there is still

71

limited information about methyl anthranilate as a QSI in Gram-negative bacteria, especially in A.

72

sobria.

73

Furthermore, molecular docking and dynamic simulation methods have gained considerable

74

importance while analyzing the binding ability of ligands to the receptor proteins and the

75

conformational changes in receptor proteins after binding. The potential anti-QS activity of

76

cinnamaldehyde was revealed using molecular docking via interaction with hydrogen bond of

77

LuxR-type protein in P. fluorescens (Li et al., 2018). The conformational changes in the LasR

78

receptor protein of P. aeruginosa due to the binding of signaling molecule or quercetin were

79

predicted by Gopu et al. (2015). In this study, we analyzed the inhibitory effect of methyl

80

anthranilate on the expression of QS-related genes and QS-regulated phenotypes in A. sobria, such

81

as biofilm formation and AHL production, in order to evaluate its potential as a QS inhibitor. To

82

further elucidate the QS inhibitory mechanism of methyl anthranilate, in silico analysis was

83

performed, including molecular docking and dynamic simulation.

84

2. Materials and Methods

85

2.1. Materials and bacterial strains

86

Methyl anthranilate (≥ 98% purity) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO,

87

USA). AHL standards, including C4-HSL, C6-HSL, C8-HSL, C10-HSL, C12-HSL, and C14-HSL,

88

were purchased from the same company. A. sobria was originally isolated and identified from

89

deteriorated turbot. Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 was generously provided by Dr. Yang

4

90

from Xinjiang Shihezi University. It was used as a reporter strain for evaluating anti-QS activity.

91

Due to the resistance, the culture medium of CV026 was supplemented with 20 µg/mL kanamycin.

92

2.2. Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of methyl anthranilate

93

The MIC for methyl anthranilate was determined against CV026 and A. sobria by Oxford

94

cup method (Diao et al., 2013). Sterilized Oxford cups were firstly put into the plates, and then, 20

95

mL LB nutrient agar containing CV026 or A. sobria overnight cultures (OD595 nm= 1.0, 200 µL)

96

was poured into plates. 200 µL of varying concentrations of methyl anthranilate (0.125 to 5

97

µL/mL) were added to the wells and cells were incubated (160 rpm at 28 °C for 24 h). Equal

98

amount of sterile water was used as the negative control. The lowest concentration of methyl

99

anthranilate, which inhibited visible growth, was selected as MIC. Further experiments were

100

performed only at the sub-MIC level.

101

2.3. Determination of cell membrane integrity of A. sobria

102

The cell membrane integrity was determined according to the method described by Chakotiya

103

et al. (2017), with slight modification. Briefly, 200 mL LB broth containing the sub-MICs (0.5

104

µL/mL, 0.25 µL/mL, 0.125 µL/mL, and 0.0625 µL/mL) of methyl anthranilate were mixed with

105

200 µL of A. sobria overnight cultures, incubated at 28 °C until the density reached 106 CFU/mL.

106

Equivalent amount of sterile water was used as negative control and each experiment was done in

107

triplicate. The mixtures were centrifuged at 9000 ×g for 5 min and the supernatant was discarded.

108

The pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4), and then, fixed with 70% ethanol at 4 °C

109

for 30 min. After washing thrice by PBS, the bacterial cells were stained with PI stain (at final

110

concentration of 10 mg/mL) in dark for 30 min at 37 °C, then measured in Flow Cytometer (BD

111

AccuriTM C6 Plus). The autofluorescence was observed in the cells without methyl anthranilate

5

112

and PI staining.

113

2.4. QS inhibitory test

114

2.4.1. Violacein inhibition assay

115

CV026 overnight cultures (200 µL) were added to LB nutrient agar (20 mL) supplemented

116

with 20 µg/mL C4-HSL, following the method of Packiavathy et al. (2012). The mixtures were

117

poured into the plates containing sterilized Oxford cups. Then, 200 µL of sub-MICs (0.5 µL/mL,

118

0.25 µL/mL, 0.125 µL/mL, and 0.0625 µL/mL) of methyl anthranilate were added to the wells,

119

equivalent amount of sterile water was served as control group. The plates were incubated at

120

28 °C for 24 h, and QS inhibitory activity was assessed by evaluating the inhibitory zones.

121

2.4.2. Quantitative assay of violacein production

122

The violacein production was quantitatively determined by the method of Zhang et al. (2018).

123

LB broth (10 mL) containing CV026 overnight cultures (100 µL) was mixed with the sub-MICs

124

(0.5 µL/mL, 0.25 µL/mL, 0.125 µL/mL, and 0.0625 µL/mL) of methyl anthranilate as well as 20

125

µg/mL C4-HSL, then incubated at 28 °C at 160 rpm for 48 h. After incubation, the mixtures (300

126

µL) were transferred to the centrifuge tubes, and mixed with 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate (150 µL)

127

and butyl alcohol (600 µL) using a vortex mixer. After centrifugation at 9000 ×g for 6 min, the

128

violacein supernatant collected in the organic layer was added into a 96-well microplate to

129

determine OD595 nm values using microplate reader (Bio-tek, Vermont, USA).

130

2.4.3. Determination of biofilm formation

131

The assay for biofilm formation was performed according to the method of Zhang et al.

132

(2014). Overnight cultures (1 mL) of A. sobria were diluted with LB broth (100 mL) and

133

transferred to the centrifuge tubes. The centrifuge tubes were supplemented with different

6

134

sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate or 20 µg/mL C4-HSL (AHL treatment group). Equivalent amount

135

of sterile water was used as control group. After cultivation at 28 °C for 48 h, 200 µL of bacterial

136

cultures were transferred to a 96-well plate to measure the absorbance at 595 nm. Then, the

137

cultures were discarded. The centrifuge tubes were rinsed gently with sterile water, air dried,

138

stained with 0.1% crystal violet (w/v) for 20 min, and rinsed again. Biofilm was solubilized with

139

33% acetic acid and added into the 96-well microplate to determine OD595

140

microplate reader (Bio-tek, Vermont, USA).

141

2.4.4. Visualization of biofilm by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and light microscopy

nm

values using

142

Biofilm visualization was performed with the method described by Zhou et al. (2018). The

143

polished zinc pieces (7 mm × 7 mm × 0.2 mm) were immersed in 10 mL of LB broth in sterile

144

plates. To the plates, A. sobria overnight cultures (100µL), the different sub-MICs of methyl

145

anthranilate, sterile water (control group), and 20 µg/mL C4-HSL (AHL treatment group) was

146

added. After incubation at 28 °C for 48 h, the biofilm formed on zinc piece was rinsed twice and

147

fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 h. The zinc piece was dehydrated in graded ethanol for 15

148

min. After air drying, the biofilm was visualized with SEM.

149

Method operations as described above, the biofilm formed on glass slides was rinsed thrice

150

with sterile water, and stained with 1mL of 0.1% crystal violet for 15 min. Then, the biofilm was

151

visualized by optical microscope.

152

2.4.5. Determination of bacterial motility

153

Motility was evaluated as described by Gutierrez-Pacheco et al. (2018), with slight

154

modifications. Swimming medium (0.5% NaCl, 0.3% agar, and 1% tryptone) or swarming

155

medium (0.5% NaCl, 0.6% agar, 0.5% D-fructose, and 1% peptone) was mixed with the different

7

156

sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate, sterile water (control group) and 20 µg/mL C4-HSL (AHL

157

treatment group), and then, poured into plates. Five microliters of A. sobria overnight cultures

158

were point inoculated at the center of plates, and each test was done in triplicate. After incubation,

159

the migration distance was determined using a vernier caliper to assess swimming and swarming

160

motility.

161

2.4.6. Determination of extracellular protease activity

162

Extracellular protease activity was assessed according to the method described by Li et al.

163

(2018). 10 mL of 15 % skim milk (115 °C, 30 min, 0.06 MPa) was mixed with 90 mL of LB

164

nutrient agar, and poured into plates. Overnight cultures of A. sobria treated with the different

165

sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate treatment, sterile water (control group), and 20 µg/mL C4-HSL

166

(AHL treatment group). After incubation, the mixtures were centrifugated at 9000 ×g for 10 min.

167

The supernatant was filtered using 0.22 µm filter; then, 100 µL of the filtrate was transferred into

168

the plates. After incubation at 28 °C for 48 h, the diameter of the transparent zone was measured

169

to assess protease activity using a vernier caliper.

170

2.4.7. Determination of AHL production

171

Overnight cultures of A. sobria with or without the different sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate

172

were incubated at 28 °C for 48 h, and then, centrifugated at 9000 ×g for 15 min. The supernatant

173

was extracted by acidified ethyl acetate (containing 0.1% acetic acid) for four times, and then,

174

concentrated by rotary evaporation. The extract was dissolved with 1 mL methanol and filtered

175

through 0.22 µm filter for GC-MS analysis.

176

AHL analysis was performed by GC-MS Agilent 7890 N/5975 (Agilent, USA). Briefly, all

177

samples were injected into HP-5 MS capillary column in the split mode (50:1), along with helium

8

178

as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injector temperature, oven temperature program,

179

and mass spectrometry conditions were set following the method of Li et al. (2016). Data were

180

acquired by full-scan mode (m/z 35-800) and selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode (m/z 143).

181

2.5. RT-qPCR analysis

182

Overnight cultures of A. sobria with or without the different sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate

183

were incubated at 28 °C, until OD595 nm values reached 1.0. Total RNA was extracted by Trizol

184

(Thermo Fisher Scientific) from each cell pellet. cDNA synthesis was performed using the

185

RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). RT-PCR reaction was

186

done by using the Power SYBR™ Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a CFX

187

Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The primer sequences were

188

designed using Primer 5.0, and listed in Table S1. cDNA was served as the template and 16S

189

rRNA was served as the internal control. Specificity of product amplification was confirmed by

190

melting curve. The 2-(∆∆CT) method was used to calculate the expression levels of target genes, as

191

previously described by Li et al. (2019).

192

2.6. Molecular Docking analysis

193

The protein sequences of LuxI (WP_101529659.1) and LuxR (WP_005335753.1) of A.

194

sobria were obtained from National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database for

195

further computer-simulated investigation. The three dimensional (3D) structures of the

196

homologous

197

(https://swissmodel.expasy.org). Ramachandran plot was used to predict whether the amino acid

198

residues in the protein were in the favored region, and reflected the rationality of conformation.

199

The preparation and optimization process of 3D protein structures were performed by Discovery

protein

were

predicted

and

9

assessed

by

SWISS-MODEL

200

Studio (DS). The structures of methyl anthranilate, halogenated furanone C30, and C4-HSL were

201

got from ZINC (http://zinc.docking.org/) and optimized in the DS for obtaining the lowest-energy

202

conformations. According to previous research (Li et al., 2018), the Libdock algorithm was used

203

to analyze the interactions between protein and ligand.

204

2.7. Molecular dynamics simulation analysis

205

Molecular dynamics simulation was performed to analyze the stability of the receptor

206

protein-signaling molecule and receptor protein-methyl anthranilate complexes using the

207

GROMACS 2018.2 package, as previously described by Zuo et al. (2017). The pdb structure of

208

complex was used as the beginning for MD simulations. The protein topology was generated by

209

Gromos54a7 force field, and ligand topology was constructed by PRODRG online server. The

210

whole complex was solvated in a cubic period box, and the minimum distance between the

211

complex and box edge was set at 1 nm. The charge of protein was neutralized by addition of a

212

sufficient number of chloride ions. Then, the energy minimization of entire system was performed

213

using 10000 steps of conjugate gradient algorithm. The entire system was equilibrated for 50 ps

214

each time for position restrains of NVT (constant number of particles, volume, and temperature)

215

and NPT (constant number of particles, pressure, and temperature). Linear Constraint Solver

216

algorithm was used for constraining the bond length during the simulation. Isothermal and isobaric

217

coupling constant were kept at 0.1 ps and 2 ps, respectively, bringing the system to a stable

218

environment of 300 K temperature and 1 bar pressure. Finally, the system at equilibrium for each

219

complex was subjected to 50 ns MD simulation with the time step of 2 fs, and the trajectory was

220

saved after every 10 ps.

221

2.8. Statistical analysis

10

222

All experiments were performed in triplicates and the data was expressed as mean ± standard

223

deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)

224

using SPSS software (version18.0). Differences at P < 0.05 were considered statistically

225

significant.

226

3. Results

227

3.1. MIC of methyl anthranilate and the effect on cell membrane integrity of A. sobria

228

The MIC of methyl anthranilate was measured with concentrations ranging from 0.125

229

µL/mL to 5 µL/mL. Determination of MIC for methyl anthranilate against CV026 and A. sobria

230

was 2.0 µL/mL and 5.0 µL/mL, respectively. Consequently, the sub-MICs (0.5 µL/mL, 0.25

231

µL/mL, 0.125 µL/mL, and 0.0625 µL/mL) of methyl anthranilate were used for further

232

experiments. In addition, propidium iodide (PI) uptake assay was performed by flow cytometry to

233

assess the effect of sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate on cell membrane integrity of A. Sobria. PI, a

234

cationic dye, could not enter an intact cell membrane but could easily enter into the damaged

235

membrane and intercalate the nucleic acids. PI stain was retained in 4.58±1.009% of bacterial

236

cells when treated with 0.0625 µL/mL methyl anthranilate (Fig. 1A, B). Besides, 6.85±0.007% of

237

cells retained the stain after treatment with maximum sub-MIC of methyl anthranilate (0.5 µL/mL).

238

The negative control showed 6.43±0.005% of PI uptake, and 0% of auto fluorescence was shown

239

by bacterial cells without methyl anthranilate and PI stain treatment.

240

3.2. Effect of methyl anthranilate on violacein production

241

The QS inhibitory activity of methyl anthranilate was evaluated by determining its effect on

242

purple pigment violacein of CV026. As shown in Fig. 1C, a clear inhibitory zone was formed after

243

treatment with methyl anthranilate. In the quantitative assay of violacein production, the sub-MICs

11

244

of methyl anthranilate exhibited a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on violacein production.

245

Maximum inhibitory rate of 41.01% was observed at a concentration of 0.5 µL/mL, with no

246

inhibition on the growth of CV026 cells (Fig. 1D).

247

3.3. Effect of methyl anthranilate on biofilm formation

248

The assessment of anti-biofilm activity of methyl anthranilate against A. sobria was shown in

249

Fig. 2A. The group treated with sub-MICs (0.5 µL/mL, 0.25 µL/mL, 0.125 µL/mL, and 0.0625

250

µL/mL) of methyl anthranilate led to a significant reduction in biofilm content of A. sobria to the

251

level of 31.67%, 34.01%, 41.27%, and 51.44%, respectively. In addition, there was no significant

252

difference in the biofilm biomass after treatment with methyl anthranilate (Fig. 2B).

253

The biofilm structure of A. sobria was visualized by optical microscopy and SEM. As shown

254

in Fig. 2C, the deep purple clustered appearance of biofilm was exhibited in AHL treatment group.

255

However, the density of biofilm was visibly reduced in the methyl anthranate treatment group, and

256

the appearance was sparse. In the SEM images (Fig. 2D), the biofilm matrices treated with methyl

257

anthranilate were clearly decreased, and exhibited a small number of microcolonies, pores, and

258

channels, whereas the biofilm treated with C4-HSL was mature and dense.

259

3.4. Effect of methyl anthranilate on motility and extracellular protease activity

260

The migration ability of A. sobria was assayed in the presence and absence of methyl

261

anthranilate. As shown in Fig. 3 (A, B), swimming and swarming motility zones of A. sobria

262

gradually reduced. In presence of 0.5 µL/mL methyl anthranilate, the maximum inhibitory rates of

263

74.84% and 71.63%, respectively, were obtained (Table S2). In addition, the migration ability of

264

cells in AHL treatment group was distinctly enhanced.

265

The ability of methyl anthranilate to reduce extracellular protease activity of A. sobria was

12

266

evaluated by measuring the diameter of transparent zone. As shown in Fig. 3C, the protease

267

produced by A. sobria was significantly inhibited. In presence of 0.5 µL/mL methyl anthranilate,

268

the protease activity decreased by 43.08 % (Table S3). However, the addition of exogenous

269

C4-HSL enhanced its protease activity.

270

3.5. Effect of methyl anthranilate on QS-related gene expression and AHL production

271

To elucidate the effect of methyl anthranilate on QS-related genes in A. sobria, the expression

272

levels of luxI and luxR genes were examined using RT-qPCR. As shown in Fig. 4A, the expression

273

levels of luxI and luxR were downregulated when treated with methyl anthranilate. The minimum

274

levels of luxI (0.160) and luxR (0.064) were observed after treatment with 0.5 µL/mL methyl

275

anthranilate. However, the expression levels of genes were significantly upregulated in AHL

276

treatment group. Moreover, the effect of methyl anthranilate on the AHL production was

277

quantitatively analyzed by GC-MS. The retention time of the six AHL standards were determined,

278

and the ratio of the peak area of the sample to the peak area of the internal standard (C14-HSL)

279

was used to evaluate the relative production of AHL (Fig. 4B). C4-HSL was the main signal

280

molecule secreted by A. sobria. The minimal concentration of C4-HSL was decreased to 0.865

281

µg/mL after treatment with 0.5 µL/mL methyl anthranilate.

282

3.6. Homology modeling and assessment

283

The 3D model of homologous proteins was predicted and assessed by SWISS-MODEL,

284

using the sequences of LuxI (acyl-homoserine-lactone synthase, WP_101529659.1) and LuxR

285

(transcriptional regulators, WP_005335753.1). Global Model Quality Estimation (GMQE) and

286

sequence similarities were used to select the best 3D model (Table S4). QMEAN scores

287

represented the degree of agreement of the structural features between the predicted model and

13

288

experimental structures of similar size. Lower QMEAN scores indicated high model quality.

289

Thereby, the models LuxI 1ro5.1.A (-1.98) and LuxR 4lfu.1.A (-2.26) were selected for further

290

analysis. Furthermore, the presence of more than 90% of the residues in the favored region of

291

Ramachandran plot indicated the high rationality of protein structure. The results revealed that

292

90.2% (LuxI) and 94.7% (LuxR) residues existed in the favored region (Fig. S2). Consequently,

293

the models of LuxI 1ro5.1.A and LuxR 4lfu.1.A exhibited great reliability, the 3D structures of

294

LuxI and LuxR proteins in A. sobria were successfully predicted.

295

3.7. Molecular docking and dynamic simulation

296

The interaction of methyl anthranilate, the natural ligand C4-HSL, and the classical QS

297

inhibitor, halogenated furanone C30, into the receptor active site was investigated by molecular

298

docking analysis. As shown in Fig. 5C and c, methyl anthranilate interacted with Ala143, Ser145,

299

Met33, and Leu147 residues of LuxR protein via the H-bonds (green dashed lines), and underwent

300

hydrophobic interactions (pink dashed lines) with Tyr35, Leu149, and Leu147 residues. In

301

addition, the C4-HSL was found to interact through H-bonds with Tyr90, Asn119, and Leu147 (Fig.

302

5A,a). The furanone C30 formed hydrogen bonds with Leu147, hydrophobic interactions with

303

Ile154 and Leu149, and halogen bonds (blue dashed lines) with Ala143 (Fig. 5B, b). For LuxI

304

protein, methyl anthranilate interacted via the H-bonds with Ala85, Gln166, Leu162, and Gly175,

305

and formed hydrophobic interactions with Val168, Val176, and Ala87 (Fig. 5D, d).

306

To further investigate the conformational changes in receptor protein in the presence of

307

C4-HSL and methyl anthranilate, 50 ns of molecular dynamics simulation was performed, and the

308

stability of two complexes was assessed by the values of root mean square deviation (RMSD) and

309

root mean square fluctuation (RMSF). Their lowest values indicated that the complex was more

14

310

stable. RMSD is a measure of the average distance between the backbone atoms of superimposed

311

proteins. As shown in the Fig. 6A, the RMSD values of LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex

312

reached a stable state at 0.62 nm after 20,000 ps, which suggested that its conformation was

313

relatively stable over the time period of 50 ns. However, the RMSD values of LuxR-C4-HSL

314

complex displayed wide fluctuations during the entire simulation process. RMSF represents the

315

position deviation of amino acid residues with respect to the reference position. LuxR receptor

316

protein is composed of A and B chains; no significant difference was observed in the two curves

317

of RMSF profile of A chain (Fig. S3); however, the two curves of B chain were markedly different.

318

The results showed that the interaction on B chain was consistent with the results of molecular

319

docking analysis. As shown in Fig. 6B, the RMSF values of LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex

320

were relatively low, indicating that it had high stability. Notably, the RMSF values of

321

LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex decreased gradually in the region of binding site (residues

322

135-150), while the RMSF values of LuxR-C4-HSL complex increased gradually in this region.

323

4. Discussion

324

Recently, many studies have shown that the interference of plant food extracts on bacterial

325

QS system could be an effective strategy to alleviate the virulence of foodborne pathogens (Zhou

326

et al., 2019). We reported a promising QS inhibitor, methyl anthranilate, which exhibited a strong

327

inhibitory activity on the QS-regulated phenotypes of A. sobria, such as biofilm formation,

328

motility, protease activity, and AHL production. In the present study, the sub-MIC levels of methyl

329

anthranilate were selected for subsequent experiments. To evaluate the effect of sub-MICs of

330

methyl anthranilate on cell viability of A. sobria, the integrity of cell membrane was characterized

331

by flow cytometry with PI uptake as an indicator. Cell membrane integrity plays a crucial role in

15

332

maintaining stable metabolism and resistance against harsh environment in bacterial cells. There

333

was no significant difference in the fluorescence intensity and the percentage of PI-positive cells

334

between the methyl anthranilate treatment group and negative control group. This indicated that

335

the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate exhibited no effect on the cell membrane integrity and no

336

damage to the bacterial cells.

337

C. violaceum CV026, a reporter strain, produced purple pigment violacein upon induction

338

with the exogenous addition of short-chain autoinducer. It was widely used to monitor the

339

production of acyl-homoserine lactone or QS inhibitory activity (Ding et al., 2019). In this study,

340

the anti-QS activity of methyl anthranilate was assessed by observing the formation of inhibitory

341

zone using the reporter strain, CV026. The results showed that the production of characteristic

342

violacein was significantly inhibited by methyl anthranilate, suggesting a high QS inhibitory

343

activity. To further evaluate the extent of inhibition on the violacein, the quantitative assay of

344

violacein production was performed. This result demonstrated the sub-MICs of methyl

345

anthranilate reduced the levels of violacein in a concentration-dependent manner without affecting

346

CV026 growth. Hence, it was confirmed that the decrease in violacein production was due to the

347

interference with QS system, rather than the inhibition of bacterial growth, which was consistent

348

with above result. Consistently, Zhang et al. (2014) found that Rosa rugosa tea polyphenol extract

349

inhibited QS-controlled violacein production in CV026 without affecting its growth.

350

In order to adapt to the environmental stress, the microbial communities adhere to the contact

351

surfaces and enmesh themselves into matrices, namely the biofilm. Biofilm is widely found on the

352

surface of food machinery and equipment made of various materials, such as metal, glass, and

353

plastic. Compared with planktonic bacteria, biofilm is more resistant and difficult to remove,

16

354

which easily cause serious contamination of food and medical equipment (Li et al., 2019). QS

355

system mediated by AHL is known to play an essential role in the process of biofilm formation

356

(Rudrappa et al., 2008). Therefore, interference of QS system could be used as a novel strategy to

357

regulate the biofilm formation (Zhou et al., 2018). This result demonstrated the sub-MICs of

358

methyl anthranilate reduced the biofilm content, with no inhibition on the growth of A. sobria

359

cells. Moreover, the addition of C4-HSL promoted the biofilm formation, which suggested that

360

biofilm formation was regulated by QS system. In this study, the effect of methyl anthranilate on

361

the biofilm microstructure of A. sobria was visualized by optical microscopy and SEM. In the

362

optical microscopy images, the biofilm formed in the presence of methyl anthranilate was sparse,

363

and the density was visibly reduced. In the AHL treatment group, the biofilm showed continuous

364

and dense appearance. The SEM images revealed that the biofilm matrices treated with C4-HSL

365

were clearly increased, and large amounts of microcolonies were connected and formed a dense

366

biofilm structure. However, the biofilm treated with methyl anthranilate exhibited a small number

367

of microcolonies, as well as the pores and channels. This suggested that methyl anthranilate might

368

cause the leakage of nutrients and reduction in biofilm matrices through these pores and channels,

369

thereby inhibiting the biofilm formation. The results of biofilm microscopy supported the

370

quantitative data. Similarly, Packiavathy et al. (2014) found that the sub-MICs of Cuminum

371

cyminum could cause the loosening of biofilm architecture and inhibit biofilm formation in

372

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens.

373

The effect of methyl anthranilate on the expression of QS-regulated phenotypes of A. sobria,

374

such as motility and extracellular protease activity, were also evaluated in this study. The bacterial

375

flagella-mediated motility, such as swimming and swarming, plays a major role in the process of

17

376

biofilm formation regulated by AHL-mediated QS system (Du et al., 2018). Thus, the reduction of

377

bacterial migration ability might affect the ability of biofilm formation (Gutierrez-Pacheco et al.,

378

2018). In this research, the zones of swimming and swarming motility in methyl

379

anthranilate-treated group were observed to be markedly reduced, indicating that the motility of A.

380

sobria was significantly inhibited by methyl anthranilate. However, the swimming and swarming

381

motility of bacteria after treatment with C4-HSL was significantly promoted, suggesting that

382

exogenous AHL could promote bacterial migration ability. These results were associated with the

383

inhibition of methyl anthranilate on the biofilm formation of A. sobria. Consistent with our results,

384

Lou et al. (2017) found that burdock leaf components decreased the aggregation ability, thus

385

inhibiting the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, extracellular protease is one of the

386

primary virulence factors regulated by QS system in many pathogens. Extracellular proteases

387

secreted by microorganisms could decompose the proteins and free amino acids in food and

388

produce volatile and stimulating compounds containing nitrogen and sulfur, thus accelerating the

389

spoilage process and leading to deterioration of food quality (Ding et al., 2017). Thus, the

390

inhibitory effect of methyl anthranilate on the protease activity of A. sobria was evaluated. The

391

results showed that the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate significantly reduced protease activity.

392

Besides, the addition of exogenous C4-HSL enhanced the protease activity of A. sobria. These

393

observations were similar with those reported by Husain et al. (2017), who reported that mango

394

extract significantly inhibited the production of virulence factors of P. aeruginosa, such as

395

protease, pyocyanin, and swarming motility.

396

Due to the interference ability of methyl anthranilate on QS system, biofilm formation,

397

migration ability, and protease activity was significantly reduced in A. sobria, along with

18

398

down-regulation of QS-related genes. The inhibition of methyl anthranilate on the QS system of A.

399

sobria was further characterized by determining the expression levels of AHL synthetase (luxI

400

gene) and receptor protein (luxR gene) using RT-qPCR technology. The results showed that the

401

expression levels of luxI and luxR were significantly down-regulated after treatment with methyl

402

anthranilate, indicating that the gene expression was interfered by methyl anthranilate.

403

Furthermore, due to the vital role of AHL in QS system of Gram-negative bacteria, the effect of

404

methyl anthranilate on the AHL (C4-HSL) production in A. sobria was analyzed using GC-MS.

405

Gradual reduction of the AHL production was observed in the methyl anthranilate-treated group,

406

which suggested that AHL production of A. sobria was effectively inhibited. Our study found that

407

the inhibition of methyl anthranilate on the QS system of A. sobria might involve interference

408

with AHL biosynthesis. These results were consistent with the reports of Li et al. (2019), who

409

reported that different sub-MICs of vanillin significantly down-regulated the expression levels of

410

QS-related genes halI/halR and the production of AHL in Hafnia alvei.

411

To reveal the anti-QS mechanism of methyl anthranilate, in silico analysis was performed.

412

The interaction between methyl anthranilate and receptor protein was evaluated using molecular

413

docking analysis. Hydrogen bonds can maintain the stability of complex molecules and play a key

414

role in molecular recognition. Here, we found that methyl anthranilate and furanone C30

415

interacted with the same residues, Leu147 and Leu149, via H-bond and hydrophobic bond,

416

respectively, revealing that two compounds had common binding sites. Moreover, methyl

417

anthranilate and C4-HSL formed H-bond interactions with LuxR protein at the common site

418

Leu147, and methyl anthranilate also exhibited hydrophobic interactions at this site. Compared

419

with furanone C30 and C4-HSL, methyl anthranilate formed more H-bond interactions with LuxR

19

420

protein. These results demonstrated that the binding affinity of methyl anthranilate bound to LuxR

421

receptor protein was higher than that of its cognate ligand C4-HSL. Furthermore, molecular

422

docking studies are not competent enough to reveal the conformational changes caused by the

423

interactions between receptors and ligands (Gopu et al., 2016). Therefore, molecular dynamics

424

simulation was performed to investigate the conformational changes of receptor protein in the

425

presence of signaling molecule and methyl anthranilate. RMSD profile showed that the

426

LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex was more stable than the LuxR-C4-HSL complex during the

427

whole simulation. This might be because the interactions between the receptor protein and methyl

428

anthranilate made the conformational changes of the receptor protein relatively small, and thus, its

429

complex was more stable. RMSF profile further demonstrated that the instability of LuxR-C4-HSL

430

complex might be related to the activation of protein conformation caused by the interactions of

431

C4-HSL, while this conformation in LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex was stabilized by

432

interactions with methyl anthranilate. The in silico results suggested that methyl anthranilate acted

433

as a potential competitive inhibitor of signaling molecules that bind to LuxR receptor protein.

434

Combined with RT-qPCR results, the QS inhibitory mechanism of methyl anthranilate might

435

involve two pathways, interfering with AHL biosynthesis as well as competitively binding with

436

receptor proteins.

437

To summarize, the inhibitory effect of methyl anthranilate against A. sobria was evaluated for

438

the first time in order to determine its possible use as a novel QS inhibitor. Our results have

439

demonstrated that methyl anthranilate exhibited a remarkable inhibition on the QS-regulated

440

phenotypes in A. sobria, including biofilm formation, motility, and protease activity. Besides, the

441

results of RTq-PCR and GC-MS showed that the expression levels of QS-related genes were

20

442

down-regulated and the biosynthesis level of AHL was reduced, when treated with the different

443

sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate. To expound QS inhibitory mechanism, the interaction between

444

methyl anthranilate and receptor protein and the conformational changes in receptor protein after

445

binding were shown by molecular docking and dynamics simulation. These results demonstrated

446

that methyl anthranilate might inhibit QS system in A. sobria by interfering with AHL

447

biosynthesis, as well as competitively binding with receptor protein. Our findings strongly

448

suggested that methyl anthranilate could be used as a novel QS inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent for

449

alleviation of the damage caused by foodborne pathogens.

450

Acknowledgements

451

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

452

and

453

(2018YFD0400601, 2017YFD0400106) and the Open Project Program of Beijing Key Laboratory

454

of Flavor Chemistry, Beijing Technology and Business University (SPFW2019YB08).

455

Conflict of interest

456

National

Key

Research

(No.

31471639),

Development

Programme

of

China

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

457 458 459

References

460

Beaz-Hidalgo, R., & Figueras, M. J., 2013. Aeromonas spp. whole genomes and virulence factors implicated in

461

fish disease. J. Fish Dis. 36, 371-388.

462

Calfee, M. W., Coleman, J. P., & Pesci, E. C., 2001. Interference with Pseudomonas quinolone signal synthesis

463

inhibits virulence factor expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98,

21

464

11633-11637.

465

Chakotiya, A. S., Tanwar, A., Narula, A., & Sharma, R. K., 2017. Zingiber officinale: Its antibacterial activity on

466

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mode of action evaluated by flow cytometry. Microb. Pathog. 107,

467

254-260.

468

Chen, J., Zhu, N., Kong, L., Bei, Y., Zheng, T., Ding, X., & He, Z., 2013. First case of soft shell disease in Chinese

469

soft-shelled turtle (Trionyx sinens) associated with Aeromonas sobria – A. veronii complex. Aquaculture

470

406, 62-67.

471

Defoirdt, T., 2018. Quorum-sensing systems as targets for antivirulence therapy. Trends Microbiol. 26, 313-328.

472

Defoirdt, T., Brackman, G., & Coenye, T., 2013. Quorum sensing inhibitors: how strong is the evidence? Trends

473

Microbiol. 21, 619-624.

474

Diao, W. R., Hu, Q. P., Feng, S. S., Li, W. Q., & Xu, J. G., 2013. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity

475

of the essential oil from green huajiao (Zanthoxylum schinifolium) against selected foodborne pathogens.

476

J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 6044-6049.

477

Ding, T., Li, T., & Li, J., 2019. Preparation of coaxial polylactic acid - propyl gallate electrospun fibers and the

478

effect of their coating on salmon slices during chilled storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11,

479

6463-6474.

480 481 482 483 484 485

Ding, T., Li, T., Wang, Z., & Li, J., 2017. Curcumin liposomes interfere with quorum sensing system of

Aeromonas sobria and in silico analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 8612.

Du, W., Zhou, M., Liu, Z., Chen, Y., & Li, R., 2018. Inhibition effects of low concentrations of Epigallocatechin

Gallate on the biofilm formation and hemolytic activity of Listeria monocytogenes. Food Contr. 85, 119-126.

Gopu, V., Meena, C. K., Murali, A., & Shetty, P. H., 2016. Petunidin as a competitive inhibitor of acylated

homoserine lactones in Klebsiella pneumoniae. RSC Adv. 6, 2592-2601.

22

486 487

Gopu, V., Meena, C. K., & Shetty, P. H., 2015. Quercetin influences quorum sensing in food borne bacteria:

in-Vitro and in-Silico evidence. Plos One 10, e0134684.

488

Gutierrez-Pacheco, M. M., Gonzalez-Aguilar, G. A., Martinez-Tellez, M. A., Lizardi-Mendoza, J.,

489

Madera-Santana, T. J., Bernal-Mercado, A. T., et al., 2018. Carvacrol inhibits biofilm formation and

490

production of extracellular polymeric substances of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum.

491

Food Contr. 89, 210-218.

492

Husain, F. M., Ahmad, I., Al-Thubiani, A. S., Abulreesh, H. H., Alhazza, I. M., & Aqil, F., 2017. Leaf extracts of

493

Mangifera indica L. inhibit quorum sensing - regulated rroduction of virulence factors and biofilm in test

494

bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 8, 727.

495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507

Janda, J. M., & Abbott, S. L., 2010. The genus Aeromonas: taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin.

Microbiol. Rev. 23, 35-73.

Kirov, S. M., Castrisios, M., & Shaw, J. G., 2004. Aeromonas flagella (polar and lateral) are enterocyte adhesins

that contribute to biofilm formation on surfaces. Infect. Immun. 72, 1939-1945.

Li, C., Liang, J., Yang, Y., Pu, J., & Hou, L.-a., 2018. Novel insights into the role of Pseudomonas quinolone

signal in the control of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling. J. Membr. Sci., 563, 505-512.

Li, R., Du, W., Yang, J., Liu, Z., & Yousef, A. E., 2018. Control of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm by

paenibacterin, a natural antimicrobial lipopeptide. Food Contr. 84, 529-535.

Li, T., Cui, F., Bai, F., Zhao, G., & Li, J., 2016. Involvement of acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs) of

Aeromonas sobria in spoilage of refrigerated turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.). Sensors 16, 1083.

Li, T., He, B., Mei, Y., Wang, D., Sun, X., & Li, J., 2019. Inhibitory effect of vanillin on the virulence factors and

biofilm formation of Hafnia alvei. LWT--Food Sci. Technol. 102, 223-229.

Li, T., Mei, Y., He, B., Sun, X., & Li, J., 2019. Reducing quorum sensing-mediated virulence factor expression

23

508

and biofilm formation in Hafnia alvei by using the potential quorum sensing inhibitor L-Carvone. Front.

509

Microbiol. 9, 3324.

510

Li, T., Wang, D., Liu, N., Ma, Y., Ding, T., Mei, Y., & Li, J., 2018. Inhibition of quorum sensing-controlled

511

virulence factors and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens by cinnamaldehyde. Int. J. Food

512

Microbiol. 269, 98-106.

513

Lou, Z., Wang, H., Tang, Y., & Chen, X., 2017. The effect of burdock leaf fraction on adhesion, biofilm

514

formation, quorum sensing and virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Appl. Microbiol. 122,

515

615-624.

516 517 518 519

Nagar, V., Shashidhar, R., & Bandekar, J. R., 2011. Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of

Aeromonas strains from various retail food products in Mumbai, India. J. Food Sci. 76, M486-492.

Ng, W. L., & Bassler, B. L., 2009. Bacterial quorum-sensing network architectures. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43,

197-222.

520

Packiavathy, I. A. S. V., Agilandeswari, P., Musthafa, K. S., Pandian, S. K., & Ravi, A. V., 2012. Antibiofilm and

521

quorum sensing inhibitory potential of Cuminum cyminum and its secondary metabolite methyl eugenol

522

against Gram negative bacterial pathogens. Food Res. Int. 45, 85-92.

523

Packiavathy, I. A., Priya, S., Pandian, S. K., & Ravi, A. V., 2014. Inhibition of biofilm development of

524

uropathogens by curcumin - an anti-quorum sensing agent from Curcuma longa. Food Chem. 148,

525

453-460.

526 527 528 529

Papenfort, K., & Bassler, B. L., 2016. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat.

Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576-588.

Parsek, M. R., & Greenberg, E. P., 2005. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and

biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 27-33.

24

530

Rudrappa, T., & Bais, H. P., 2008. Curcumin, a known phenolic from Curcuma longa, attenuates the virulence of

531

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in whole plant and animal pathogenicity models. J. Agric. Food Chem.

532

56, 1955-1962.

533 534

Rutherford, S. T., & Bassler, B. L., 2012. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its

control. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Med. 2, a012427.

535

Truchado, P., Gil-Izquierdo, A., Tomas-Barberan, F., & Allende, A., 2009. Inhibition by chestnut honey of

536

N-Acyl-L-homoserine lactones and biofilm formation in Erwinia carotovora, Yersinia enterocolitica,

537

and Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 11186-11193.

538 539 540 541

Truchado, P., Larrosa, M., Castro-Ibáñez, I., & Allende, A., 2015. Plant food extracts and phytochemicals: Their

role as Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 43, 189-204.

Whiteley, M., Diggle, S. P., & Greenberg, E. P., 2017. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing

research. Nature 551, 313-320.

542

Zhang, Y., Kong, J., Huang, F., Xie, Y., Guo, Y., Cheng, Y., et al., 2018. Hexanal as a QS inhibitor of

543

extracellular enzyme activity of Erwinia carotovora and Pseudomonas fluorescens and its application in

544

vegetables. Food Chem. 255, 1-7.

545 546

Zhang, J., Xin, R., Wang, L. I., Ying, G., Sun, X., & Dong, M., 2014. Polyphenolic extract from Rosa rugosa tea

inhibits bacterial quorum sensing and biofilm formation. Food Contr. 42, 125-131.

547

Zhou, J. W., Chen, T. T., Tan, X. J., Sheng, J. Y., & Jia, A. Q., 2018. Can the quorum sensing inhibitor resveratrol

548

function as an aminoglycoside antibiotic accelerant against Pseudomonas aeruginosa? Int. J. Antimicrob.

549

Agents 52, 35-41.

550 551

Zhou, J. W., Luo, H. Z., Jiang, H., Jian, T. K., Chen, Z. Q., & Jia, A. Q., 2018. Hordenine: a novel quorum sensing

inhibitor and antibiofilm agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66, 1620-1628.

25

552

Zhou, J. W., Ruan, L. Y., Chen, H. J., Luo, H. Z., Jiang, H., Wang, J. S., & Jia, A. Q., 2019. Inhibition of Quorum

553

Sensing and Virulence in Serratia marcescens by Hordenine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 67, 784-795.

554

Zuo, K., Liang, L., Du, W., Sun, X., Liu, W., Gou, X., et al., 2017. 3D-QSAR, molecular docking and molecular

555

556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564

dynamics simulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa LpxC inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 761.

A

B

C

D

Fig. 1. Quantitative assessment of cell membrane integrity, Cells were stained with PI and analyzed by flow cytometry (A). (Con fcs) control fluorescence, (Auto fcs) Auto fluorescence, (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5) methyl anthranilate fluorescence. Cell membrane integrity was evaluated by PI- positive cell rate (B). Inhibitory activity of the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate on the violacein production in CV026 (C). Quantitative analysis of violacein production and CV026 biomass after treatment with the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 µL/mL) (D).

26

565 566 567 568 569 570

A

C

B

D

Fig. 2. Quantitative analysis of biofilm content (A) and biofilm biomass (B) with sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate or C4-HSL treatment. Optical microscopic images (C) and SEM images (D) of the biofilm of A. sobria with sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate or C4-HSL treatment. (a) 20 µg/mL C4-HSL, (b) control, (c–f) 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 µL/mL methyl anthranilate. A

B

C

571 572 573 574

Fig. 3. Inhibitory effect of the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate on swimming (A) and swarming (B) motility, as well as proteinase activity (C) of A. sobria. (a) 20 µg/mL C4-HSL, (b) control group, (c–f) 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.50 µL/mL methyl anthranilate.

27

A

B

575 576 577 578 579

580 581 582 583 584 585 586

Fig. 4. Effect of the sub-MICs of methyl anthranilate on the relative expression of luxI and luxR genes (A) was assessed by RTq-PCR, and the AHL production (B) of A. sobria was evaluated by GC-MS. A

a

B

b

C

c

D

d

Fig. 5. Molecular docking of the native ligands C4-HSL, halogenated furanone C30, and methyl anthranilate with the LuxR and LuxI protein models are shown as a 3D diagram (A–D) and 2D diagram (a–d). (A,a) native ligands C4-HSL, (B,b) halogenated furanone C30, (C,c) methyl anthranilate, (D,d) methyl anthranilate combined with LuxI.

28

A

587 588 589 590 591 592

B

Fig. 6. RMSD profile (A) and RMSF profile (B) of LuxR-C4-HSL and LuxR-methyl anthranilate complex during 50 ns of molecular dynamics simulation. Black line represents the complex of LuxR protein and signaling molecule while red line indicates the complex of LuxR protein and methyl anthranilate.

29

Highlights    

Methyl anthranilate significantly inhibited the QS-regulated phenotypes in A. sobria, such as biofilm formation, motility and protease activity. Methyl anthranilate down-regulated the expression levels of QS-related genes and reduced the biosynthesis level of AHL in A. sobria. The QS inhibitory mechanism of methyl anthranilate might involve two pathways, interfering with AHL biosynthesis as well as competitively binding with receptor protein. Methyl anthranilate could be as a promising QS inhibitor and anti-biofilm agent for improving food safety.