Mevalonate phosphorylation in the neonatal chick liver

Mevalonate phosphorylation in the neonatal chick liver

Vol. 72, No. 1, 1976 BIOCHEMICAL MEVALONATE AND BIOPHYSICAL PHOSPHORYLATION NEONATAL J. Garcia-Martinez, J. L. Department of Received SUMMAR...

267KB Sizes 0 Downloads 69 Views

Vol. 72, No. 1, 1976

BIOCHEMICAL

MEVALONATE

AND BIOPHYSICAL

PHOSPHORYLATION NEONATAL

J.

Garcia-Martinez,

J. L.

Department

of

Received SUMMARY. extracts studied.

2,

9.5.

attention

hatching,

Ovarian

of shows

of

into

feeding

of

mevalonic

the

of

other

*Abbreviations: MVAPP, glutaryl-CoA.

known

Gallus

by

soybean

acid

(MVA)* the

in

and

E.

Granada,

Garcia-Peregrfn Granada,

Spain

acid by cell-free development was profiles for phospho-

phosphorylation difference

after

increase hatching.

in

the

chick

that

it

differs

in

the

has

chick (2).

biosynthesis

slices

Few

studied to

from

the

from

hog

little

that

of 14’

l[1 and

in from

liver

rabbit

1-14C 1:

3

the

conducted

avian

MVA

kinase (3,4),

acetate

by

been

cholesterol

I

mammals.

estradiol-17@

enhanced

have

mevalonate

C

of

was

cholesterol

of

received

incorporation

liver

of where

The

the 1-6

amount

incorporate

(1).

observed. at pH maximum

during between

testosterone

incorporation

purified

of

formation has been is quite similar shows a clear

domesticus

meal

mammals,

partially

is (EC

on

livers. well 2.4.

liver

1.36) (5)

sources. The

liver

significant at day 7

gonadotrophin

raw

Nevertheless,

and

well

cholesterol

established

a

androstenedione,

presence

acetate

rat

is

progesterone,

been

of

mevalonate no significant

metabolism it

slices

has

University

but formed

though

the

Suarez

pyrophosphomevalonate phosphomevalonate formed the pyrophosphomevalonate

Cholesterol

in

M.D.

1976

The pattern development

days after phosphomevalonate

into

Segovia,

THE

LIVER

- The phosphorylation of mevalonic from chick liver in the early steps A clear difference in the pH-activity

mevalonate and The amount of 7.5-9.5 whereas at pH neonatal

IN

CHICK

Biochemistry,

July

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

has

mechanism been

of

elucidated.

MVA, pyrophosphomevalonic

mevalonic

regulation There acid; acid;

of is

cholesterol

general

MVAP, HMG-CoA,

biosynthesis agreement

phosphomevalonic ;!-hydroxy-p-methyl-

in

that acid;

Vol.

72, No.

1, 1976

t-MC-CoA

reductase

cholesterol role

in

the

shown

that

MVA as

regulation

of

geranyl-PP

plants,

of

French-beans

isoenzymes

of

in

the

chloroplasts

of

7.5

and

kinase

5.5

being

from

active

at As

regulation MVA

of

the

Pinus

pH an

We

7.9

(6)

have

inhibitors

both

terpenyl

of

pyrophosphates

seems

within

the to

seedlings

(9)

the

one

outside

them,

and

Agave

elucidate

the

role

specific

compounds

(7).

of

two

one with

two

pinaster

controlled

presence

demonstrated,

isolated

be

and

certain

been

have

to

cell

have

other

respectively.

activity

that

in

important

Porter

powerful

membranes

kinase

an

and

biosynthesis

pumpkin

mevalonate

enzyme play

Dorsey

segregation

and

and

may

COMMUNICATIONS

MVA.

intracellular

(8)

kinase

are

terpenoid

enzyme

the

rate-limiting

farnesyl-PP

after

RESEARCH

the

suggesting

the of

is

process.

controls

a combination

In

this

liver,

physiological

impermeability

of

pig

BIOPHYSICAL

MVA

and

from

AND

1. 1. 1. 34) However

In by

(EC

synthesis.

kinase

act

BIOCHEMICAL

an

located optimum

fractions

pH

with

americana,

both

MVA fractions

(10).

intent

to

cholesterol

biosynthesis,

phosphorylation

in

the

we

chick

liver

of have in

MVA

kinase

in

the

studied

some

aspects

early

steps

of

the

development. MATERIALS New-born

White

AND

Leghorn

male

METHODS chicks

were

obtai_nv4from

commercial hatchery and maintained on a commercial diet. was supplied as the lactone by the Radiochemical Centre, England. The potassium salt was prepared by treating the 360

for

30

min with Cell-free

in a Potter-Elvehjem pH 7.5, so that was centrifuged supernatant was Unless

an excess extracts

of were

KOH. obtained

by

homogenizing

a

12C]MVA Amershan, lactone at the

liver

homogenizer with 0.05 M Tris-maleate buffer, the final liver/buffer ratio is l/10. The homogenate at 15000 2 for 30 min at 49. Protein content in the determined by the Lowry method (11). otherwise specified, the reaction systyq contained

6 rmol es of MgCl2, 12 umoles of ATP, 75 nmoles 150 pmol-es of Trts-maleate buffer and 0. 2-0.5 mg final volume of 1.5 ml. The reaction mixture was for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by heating the 5 min. Aliquots (25 ,ul) of supernatants were applied paper strips and developed by the ascending technique formic acid-water (77:13:10). Radioactive spots on were detected and measured in a Nuclear-Chicago

203

of ]2C] MVA, of protein in a incubated at 372 tubes to 908 for to

Whatman No 1 in butanolthe dried strips Actigraph III system.

Vol. 72, No. 1, 1976

MVA liver

has

MVAP

whereas

MVAPP

prolonged

to 50

adding

the to

90

It

is

10

-3

of

of

cysteine

has

been

the

Fig.

l.-

1).

The

maximum

we

has

over

increases in of

chick

O-180

min,

O-30

the

min,

reactions

amount

of

are

MVAPP

found

studied

the mixture,

the

MVAP

the

range

the

protector

of

showing

O-O.5 to

case

phosphorylation

formation

linearly

any

MVA

MVA -SH

is mg,

1.5

that

mg

in

proportional whereas

protein

the (Fig.

phosphorylation groups.

1). is

Addition

of

effect.

incorporation studied

as

reaction

Methods

that

no

for

between

far

have

the

added

presence

time

as

from

out

linearly

linear

in in

note

extract

carried

is

protein

formed to

on

reaction

hand,

protein

a cell-free

formed.

other

MVAPP

important

M

MVAP

mg

DISCUSSION

occurs

described

The liver

the

amount

dependent

in

(Fig.

that

O-2.5

amount

by

formation

min

%

conditions the

AND

formation

On by

RESULTS

investigated

that

about

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

phosphorylation

been

showing

is

BIOCHEMICAL

of over

the

MVA

by

range

cell-free pH

6.5-9.5

extracts in

0.05

from M

chick Tris-

(min)

Influence of incubation on MVA phosphorylation The results chick I iver. experiments ? S. E.M. in the text. 0, MVAP;

204

time and protein concentration by cell-free extracts from are given as means of six Experimental details are given 0, MVAPP.

not

BIOCHEMICAL

Vol. 72, No. 1, 1976

Fig.

2.-

Effect

maleate

buffer.

profiles

for

is

similar

quite

maximum

has is

at

the

optimum

surroundings

The development found amount Wrking shown

between of

l-6

a clear

in days

formed with

These for

the

pH MVAP

of

phosphorylation

Fig.

3.

after has

the

and

No

to

the

at

cholesterol

205

from

of

control

which

yeast

its

this

which observed

intracellular

enzyme

the

significant 7 after

activity.

neonatal have

increase

at

those

kinase,

differences

day

almost

difference

pH

Gomez-Capilla total

is

from

during

A

formation

MVAP

The

significant

found

domesticus in

(13).

system

hatching. been

liver

pH-activity

value

enzyme

5.3-10.0

a

pH

means are

a clear

differ

pig

similar

kinase

MVA

this

as

MVAP

shows

results

the

suggest

Gallus

decrease

(12)

at

the

The

MVAPP

MVAPP

unlike

of

the

in

2).

cell-free

given details

observed

(Fig.

7. 5.

range

to

shown

MVAP also

7. 3,

pattern

is

pH

Popjak

pH

seems

of

by

results are Experimental 0, MVAPP.

been

whereas

amount

the

phosphorylation

formation

at

of in

MVA

has

7.5-9.5

and pH

the

MVAPP

The

Hellig

on

chick liver. The six experiments. text. l , MVAP;

obtained

active

between

pH

difference

pH

9.5.

optimum

equally

clear and

that by

an

A

pH

than

reported

the from of the

MVAP

at

4-fold

of

extracts ? S.E.M. given in

AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

been in

the

hatching. et

al.

day

5

(14) and

have 10

after

Vol.

72, No.

BIOCHEMICAL

1,1976

1

2

3

AND

4

BIOPHYSICAL

5

6

7

RESEARCH

8

9

COMMUNlCATlONS

lo

days

Fig.

3.-

MVA liver

phosphorylation during the

by

cell-free extracts from chick development. The results are with the number of observations ? S. E.M., Experimental details are given in the text. neonatal

given as means in parentheses. 0,

eclosion,

MVAP;

a decrease

phosphorylation the

Only

Barnes

fluctuation of

in

development

MVA

Sarcophaga

that

kinase

On

the

have

be

parallel

other

from

to

hand,

kinase determined

activity

and of

livers

decarboxylation

in

MVA

little

is

animal

some

larva,

the

known

sources.

developmental

pharate

adult

and

of is

one

Shah

(16)

mevalonate

suckling

have by

and

rate-limiting

studied 105000

weaned

the 9

rats,

step

in

the

used

in

all

showing hepatic

synthesis.

experiments,

the fraction

l-MG-CoA system

to

mevalonate

(15)

from

Although

soluble

of

decarboxylation

fraction

cholesterol

seem

period.

Ramachandran and

MVAPP

not

bullata.

Recently,

supernatant

this

Goodfellow

the

phosphorylation

does

pattern

and in

MVAPP.

which

ability

about

adult

0,

ceil-free MVA (Table

reductase of

the

cholesterol

extracts

activating 1).

The

(unpublished

have

enzymes

are

microsomal

suggests in

206

essentially tocation

results)

metabolism

been

this

source.

the

located of

another

the

chick regulation

in liver

the

Vol.

72, No.

BIOCHEMICAL

1, 1976

AND

Table Intracellular

distribution

of

BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH

1

MVA-activating

enzymes

Specific

activity

from

(dpm

/

homogenate

15000

2

31.99

t 1.21

6.24

_+ 0.48

pellet

105 000

2

supernatant

75.22

t 2.03

105000

9

pellet

13.79

? 0.61

Results

are

given

as

means

chick

mg

liver.

protein)

MVAPP

MVAP Crude

COMMUNICATIONS

? S. E.M.

of

3.32

Z 0.30

9.21’_

three

0.66

experiments.

REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.

Boucek, R. J. and 15, 6-11. Sklan, D., Ascarelli,

Savard,

K. I.

(1970)

and

53, 1239-1241. Levy, H. R. and Popjak, G. Beytia, E., Dorsey, J.K., Porter, J. W. (1970) J. Biol. Markely, K. and Smallamn, 47, 327-335. Dorsey, J. K. and Porter, 4667-4670.

Gen.

Bubowski, (1960) Marr, Chem. E.

J. W.

Comp. P.

Endocrinol.

(1974)

Poultry

Biochem. J. 75, 417-428. J., Cleland, W. W. and 245, 5450-5458.

(1961)

Biochim.

(1968)

J.

Biophys. Biol.

Chem.

Rogers, L. J., Shah, S. P. J. and Goodwin, T. W. (1968) Photosynthetica 2, 184-207. Rogers, L. J., Shah, S. P. J. and Goodwin, T. W. (1966) Biochem. J. 100, 14C-17c. Loomis, W.D. and Battaille, J. (1963) Biochim. Biophys. 67, 54-63. Garcia-Peregrfn, E., Suarez, M.D. and Mayor, F. (1973) FEBS Lett. 30, 15-17. Lowry, 0. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275. Hellig,

H.

and

Popjak,

J.

(1961)

207

Sci.

J.

Lipid

Res.

2,

235-243.

Acta 243,

Acta

R. J.

BIOCHEMICAL

Vol. 72, No. 1,1976

13. 14. 15. 16.

Bloch, K., Chaykin, (1959) J. Biol. Chem. Gomez-Capilla, J.A., Osorio, C. (1975) Barnes, F. J. and 17, 1415-1427. Ramachandran, Res. Comm.

C. 69,

AND BIOPHYSICAL

S.,

Phillips, A.H. 234, 2595-2604. Macarulla, J.M.,

Rev. Esp. Goodfellow, K. and 42-47.

Fisiol. R.D.

Shah,

208

S.N.

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

and

de

Waard,

Martin-And&s,

31, (1971) (1976)

177-182. J. Insect Biochem.

A. A. Physiol. Biophys.

and