Accepted Manuscript Micro Scale Analytical Derivatizations on Solid Phase Sanka N. Atapattu, Jack M. Rosenfeld PII:
S0165-9936(18)30512-0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.028
Reference:
TRAC 15292
To appear in:
Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Received Date: 27 September 2018 Revised Date:
24 October 2018
Accepted Date: 25 October 2018
Please cite this article as: S.N. Atapattu, J.M. Rosenfeld, Micro Scale Analytical Derivatizations on Solid Phase, Trends in Analytical Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.028. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Micro Scale Analytical Derivatizations on Solid Phase
2
34 35 36 37 38
By Sanka N. Atapattu* and 2Jack M. Rosenfeld
1
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine McMaster University Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada
TE D
M AN U
2
SC
CanAm Bioresearch Inc. Winnipeg, MB R3T 0P4 Canada
RI PT
1
EP
Address for correspondence: Sanka N. Atapattu CanAm BioResearch Inc. 6-1200 Waverley Street Winnipeg, MB R3T 0P4 Tel: 204-599-5434 Fax: 204-488-9823 E-mail:
[email protected]
AC C
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 Abstract
40
Analytical derivatization (AD), a subset of functional group analysis, alters the structure of an
41
analyte to a product more suitable for analysis. The reactions impart stability to the product and a
42
functionality that enhances sensitivity and specificity to the determinations. By targeting the
43
functional groups for labeling AD adds selectivity to the measurements. Associated with these
44
advantages, however, is the additional step required in sample preparation. The issue of the extra
45
step was resolved by solid phase analytical derivatization (SPAD) which combined the extraction
46
and derivatization step or limited the process to a one-pot reaction in which extraction and
47
derivatization occurred on the solid phase without intermediate isolation of the analyte. Within
48
the broad class of organic acids, SPAD provides conditions that can: derivatize both
49
functionalities; selectively derivatize carboxylic acids in the presence of phenols by reaction at
50
neutral pH which does not ionize phenols; derivatize phenols in the presence of acids by
51
selectively inhibiting derivatization of carboxylic acids at alkaline pH. These reaction
52
characteristics hold whether carboxylic acids are on different compounds or on the same
53
compounds. In the case of carbonyls, SPAD enhances the reaction rate over solution chemistry
54
so that both aldehydes and the usually slower reacting ketones are rapidly extracted/derivatized
55
in one step. The derivatization incorporates chromophores, fluorophores and electrophores for
56
purpose of detection, as well lipophilicity for purpose of extraction. In the case of primary and
57
secondary amines, SPAD functional groups that enhance sensitivity and/or lipophilicity. Initially,
58
SPAD was a batch process but transitioned into a microextraction/derivatization and an
59
automated technique.
64 65
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
61 62 63
Key words: Analytical derivatization, Solid phase analytical derivatization, Sample preparation, Microextraction methods.
AC C
60
RI PT
39
1. Introduction
Solid phase extractions (SPE) were developed to overcome the well-known difficulties of
66
liquid/liquid extractions (LLE). It is a successful and valuable technique with wide applications
67
in bio-analytical and environmental problems. There are, however, classes of analytes that
68
cannot be effectively determined by sorption/desorption alone but require derivatization. Solid
69
phase analytical derivatizations (SPAD) add an extra dimension to SPE while maintaining its
70
advantages [1-3]. It is a green chemistry with low or no organic solvent consumption and SPAD
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3 71
reduces cost by raising efficiency.
72
regularly reviewed [1-3].
These are significant advantages.
The field has been
The reagents used in SPAD impart increased sensitivity of detection and/or stability to
74
the derivatives. In chromatographic analysis when analyte molecules have unfavorable
75
interactions with the LC or GC stationary phase can result in loss of sensitivity, poor resolution
76
and peak tailing [1]. Derivatizing the target analyte with a suitable reagent would not only
77
improve peak resolution, peak shape but also achieve better sensitivity. This is an important
78
aspect in trace level analysis when analysts have restrictions with instrument sensitivity [1,3].
RI PT
73
In the case of hydrophilic compounds, the derivatives are more lipophilic which
80
facilitates isolation. The reactions occur at ambient temperature and in the case of ketones, are
81
often considerably faster than those in solution. These mild conditions are particularly important
82
for derivatization of potentially unstable compounds such as prostaglandin E2. Because reagents
83
are added to the reaction mixture there is great flexibility in matching reagents to analyte.
M AN U
SC
79
An important variant of SPAD facilitated glycomic investigations [4,5]. Glycoproteins
85
and glycopeptides were bound onto Aminolink 4% a cross linked beaded agarose bead with
86
aldehyde functionality. The terminal amino groups on macromolecule react with the aldehyde to
87
form an imine which is reduced to an amine by NaCNBH4 to immobilize the protein or peptide.
88
Despite the immobililzation, the glycoproteins and glyopeptides were reactive to both
89
derivatizing reagents and – perhaps surprisingly to hydrolytic enzymes in solutions added to the
90
resin. The reactivity allowed modifications of sialic acids which included, esterification with
91
ethanol and subsequent amidation with p-toluidine both under catalysis by N-(3-
92
(dimethylamino)propyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimidehydrochloride (EDC). These derivatizations were
93
instrumental in differentiating between α2,3 and α2,6 linkages of sialic acids which are
94
recognition molecules for viral infections. The N-glycans were enzymatically cleaved and eluted
95
from the beads using the well-known PNGase procedure. The O- glycans were cleaved and
96
eluted from the beads by a newly discovered enzyme termed Operator [4,5]. This demonstrate
97
that the enzymatic activity on the solid phase was not limited to PNGase.
AC C
EP
TE D
84
98
Solid phase configurations explored during development and use of SPAD included
99
beads suspended in a liquid, beads packed into columns, solid phases on filters or as a thin film
100
on a fiber for solid phase microextraction (SPME) [1-3].
Initial SPAD techniques were batch
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 4 101
processes but these transitioned to a column configuration and full automation as a miniaturized
102
technique. Despite the advantages of SPAD, there remains the critique that large excess of reagents
104
are required. While these are often chromatographically well separated from the derivatives, the
105
excess reagent can contribute contaminants with potential for interference to analysis. Excess of
106
reagent may be required to achieve complete reaction and require cleanup protocols. The
107
reagent excess can compromise the reusability of the solid phase – for instance shortening the
108
life time of the SPME fiber. Use of reagents also precludes direct in-vivo sampling. However,
109
extraction followed by derivatization of the sorbed analyte can provide advantages of SPAD
110
without exposing the organism to reactive compounds.
112 113
SC
This review covers microextraction applications of SPAD with a focus on literature
M AN U
111
RI PT
103
published 2017-2018.
2. Solid phase analytical derivatization early developments
The XAD resins formulated as beads were widely used in SPE applications due to their
115
high surface area and high absorptivity of lipophilic analytes and reagents mainly through
116
hydrophobic bonding and concentrating a smaller volume of beads. In addition, the XAD resins
117
are stable to acidic and alkaline. The first SPAD reaction reported in 1984 as well as subsequent
118
methods used XAD-2, a styrene–divinylbenzene crosslinked polymeric macroreticular resin as
119
the solid phase [6]. Use of XAD resins with different physical or chemical characteristics did
120
not improve yield or reaction rate.
TE D
114
A variety of reagents and analytes were tested. Pentafluorobenzyl bromide (PFBBr)
122
served to form PFB esters of carboxylic acids or PFB ethers of phenols such as
123
tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids [1-3]. Derivatization at alkaline pH using PFBBr
124
produced PFB esters of carboxylic acids and PFB ethers of phenols. At neutral pH the SPAD
125
yielded only the esters of carboxylic acids. Addition of small volumes of C1-C5 alcohols to a
126
SPAD reaction at alkaline pH suppressed the formation of the esters but not of phenols thus
127
providing enhanced specificity to the analysis. Derivatization with pentafluoropyridine (PFP)
128
under alkaline SPAD conditions was selective towards phenols in the presence of carboxylic
129
acids. Pentafluorobenzyl hydroxyl amine (PFBONH2), benzyl hydroxylamine (BzONH2) rapidly
130
form PFBoxime or Bzoximes of aldehydes and ketones ranging in size from C1-C20.
AC C
EP
121
Under
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 131
acidic SPAD 2,4 dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) rapidly formed the hydrazone product of both
132
aldehydes and ketones. In recent years researchers have explored novel solid phases for SPAD. These included
134
solid phase microextraction fibers, various nanoparticles, monolith columns, metals, metal
135
oxides, glass plates, GC injection ports, hollow fibers, stir bars and ionic liquids. Some of the
136
key milestones in SPAD method development are listed in Table 01.
137
RI PT
133
138
3. Applications of Analytical Derivatization on SPME (SPMAD)
SC
139
The combination of AD and SPME produced solid phase micro analytical derivatization.
141
It proved an effective tool in determining a wide range analytes in numerous matrices. SPME is
142
based on the equilibrium between the solid and fluid phases. SPMAD, continually removes the
143
analyte from the fluid phase and can go to completion resulting in higher yields.
M AN U
140
As in the case of SPAD, the literature reports two broadly defined methods for SPMAD
145
[1-3]. In the first approach the SPME fiber is impregnated with the reagent is immersed in the
146
aqueous solution or headspace for simultaneous derivatization and extraction. The reagent in this
147
case must have some stability to water. In the second approach analytes are first extracted from
148
aqueous solution or from headspace. The fiber is then exposed to the reagent in another vessel
149
for on-fiber derivatization and then finally desorbed thermally or by elution with solvent.
TE D
144
Two factors determine on-fiber derivatization SPME for a fiber immersed in a liquid. If
151
the liquid phase is not stirred, diffusion determines the rate of adsorption of which brings analyte
152
and reagent into contact. If the liquid phase is stirred convection and diffusion are the two
153
factors that bring the analyte and reagent into contact on a SPME fiber. In SPME head space on-
154
fiber derivatization it is diffusion which determines the rate at which analyte and the reagent are
155
brought into contact.
AC C
156
EP
150
Recent work describes use of SPMAD to determine carboxylic acids [1,3], phenols [15],
157
primary and secondary amines [1,3], carbonyls [1,3,16].
158
SPMAD are summarized in Table 2.
159
The analytes and reagents used in
160
Demands for reduced cost and time of analysis led to a focus on developing fully
161
automated analytical methods. The instrumentation exploited SPME fibers served as the solid
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 6 162
phase for AD. Automation included the following steps: SPME fiber pre-conditioning: sample
163
extraction: exposing the analytes that were loaded on the fiber to the derivatizing reagent for on -
164
fiber derivatization; thermal desorption of derivatized analytes in the GC inlet; and finally,
165
cleaning and post-condition the fiber for the next sample analysis. Lopez-Serna
et al [17]
used MTBSTFA as a derivatizing reagent to detect
RI PT
166
pharmaceutical and personal care products in sewage and sewage sludge in a fully automated
168
direct immersion followed by a headspace on -fiber derivatization SPMAD method. The authors
169
first immersed the fiber in the sample matrix for analyte absorption for 120 min and the fiber was
170
contacted with MTBSTFA headspace for on-fiber derivatization.
SC
167
Yuan and co-workers [15] described a similar automated method for analysis of eleven
172
chloro- and bromo-phenolic endocrine disruptive compounds (EDC). The reported method
173
included: SPME fiber pre-conditioning by heating to 290 °C; sorption of analyte in the
174
headspace: exposure of sorbed analyte to BSTFA for in a second head space mode extraction for
175
on-fiber derivatization and finally thermal desorption of silylated EDC derivatives for GC-MS
176
analysis. The proposed method was validated for eleven EDC compounds in surface water and
177
reported LLOD values 8.8-42.9 ng/L.
Sala and co-workers [16] determined carbonyls formed in electronic cigarettes. In this
179
work
derivatizing
reagent
PFBHA
was
coated
on
a
tri-phasic
180
divinylbenezene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane SPME fiber contacting the fiber with the
181
derivatizing reagent in headspace mode for 30 seconds. Then the fiber was then contacted with
182
cigarette vapor for 15 minutes for simultaneous extraction and derivatization of carbonyls.
EP
the
TE D
178
M AN U
171
Sorption of airborne target analytes onto solid phase preparatory to chromatographic
184
and/or mass spectrometric analysis is a robust technique. Dugheri and co-worker [18] compared
185
three analytical methods for the analysis of airborne peracetic acid. In their first method target
186
analyte peracetic acid was trap in a silica gel solid sorbent by having an airflow of 1 l/min for 15
187
minutes. The absorbed analyte was desorbed using acetonitrile and then analyzed by GC-MS. In
188
their second method derivatizing reagent MTS was coated on a carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane
189
SMPE fiber. The target analyte was simultaneously extracted and derivatized on a SPME fiber
190
for GC-MS analysis. An electrochemical direct-reading was the third method authors compared.
191
Although all three methods they evaluated showed promising for the analysis of airborne
192
peracetic acid the SPMAD provided lower LLOQ of 0.027 mg/m3whereas the silca gel solid
AC C
183
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 7 193
sorbent method and the electrochemical direct-reading methods had LLOQ values of 0.330 and
194
0.122 mg/m3respectively. Recent legalization or decriminalization marijuana for medicinal and recreational use of
196
cannabis in North America have renewed interest in development of analytical methods for
197
cannabinoids. This is being aided by the availability novel solid phases and derivatizing reagents
198
which lead the development of new techniques. Franklin and co-workers [19] applied a HS-
199
SPMAD on-fiber derivatization method for the analysis of phytocannabinoids from buccal
200
swabs. The authors used MSTFA as the derivatizing reagent which was placed in a GC insert
201
inside a 20 ml vial along with the buccal swabs containing phytocannabinoids. The 20 ml vial
202
was heated to 150°C for 5 minutes. The fiber was exposed to the vial for 60 seconds for
203
headspace adsorption. Both the derivatizing reagent and phytocannabinoids in swabs were
204
simultaneously contacted and analytes were derivatized in HS-SPMAD. The fiber containing
205
derivatized phytocannabinoids were thermally desorbed in a GC inlet for 30 seconds for analysis.
206
Pinto et al [20] focused on the need for green chemistry in their determination of lignin
207
derived phenols in sediments. The authors coated BSTFA on a polyacrylate fiber SPME fiber.
208
The solid sample was heated in a vial to vaporize the target analytes and which were sorbed and
209
derivatized on the fiber. Derivatized phenols were analyzed by GC-FID.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
195
Biogenic amines are formed in food as a result of decarboxylation of amino acids in
211
meat, dairy products, alcoholic beverages and fruits during production, storage or spoilage.
212
Analysis of biogenic amines in fish [21] was the focus of a recently published work using on-
213
fiber SPAD. The authors used isobutyl chloroformate as the derivatizing reagent. Traditionally
214
in SPME the organic stationary phase is coated on fragile silica substrate. As result SPME fibers
215
have reduced life times especially when exposed to chemical reagents for derivatizations and
216
poor thermal stability. One alternative is stationary phases made out of metal-organic
217
frameworks. These SPME phases have high porosity, large specific surface area, thermal
218
stability and good chemical resistance which are all very desirable features for a solid phase in a
219
SPAD method. This was the focus of a recently published report by Huang and co-workers [21].
220
The authors explored a zeolitic imidazolate framework 8 (ZIF-8) as the stationary phase for on-
221
fiber derivatization method for analysis of biogenic amines in fish. The solid phase was first
222
coated with the derivatizing reagents isobutyl chloroformate in a headspace mode and then the
223
analyte was contacted with the coated fiber in direct immersion for simultaneous extraction and
AC C
EP
210
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 8 224
derivatization. The high specific surface area of the porous ZIF-8 coating facilitated load more
225
derivatizing reagent on the SPME stationary phase resulting in higher sensitivity. Applications of particle based SPAD
227
SPAD remains a topic of current interest and application to important biomedical and
228
environmental problems. In developing such methods contacting the analyte and the reagent is
229
the most important process. There are four ways where AD is combined with SPE in SPAD
230
applications: (i) impregnating the solid phase with the derivatizing reagent and then passing the
231
sample solution through the solid phase, (ii) passing the sample solution in order to adsorb on the
232
solid phase and then percolate the derivatizing reagent, (iii) derivatize the analyte before the SPE
233
step, and (iv) derivatize the analyte after the SPE step. Recent particle based SPAD methods are
234
summarized in Table 3.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
226
235
236
SPAD addressed a challenge in metabolomics by the determination of cationic and anionic metabolites with varying structures.
A recent report demonstrated simultaneous
238
derivatization of organic cations and anions in a SPAD based method [14]. Determination such
239
metabolites requires combination of a strong anion-exchange resin with a strong anion exchange
240
resin. The solid phase cartridge contained two layers; a polymer based strong anion-exchange
241
resin in the bottom layer to isolate amino acids/amines and a polymer based strong cation-
242
exchange resin in the top layer to isolate. A wide range of amino acids and organic acids were
243
derivatized first by methoximation followed by trimethylsilylation as shown in figure 1. The
244
developed method was validated analyzing amino acids and organic acids in human plasma.
EP
TE D
237
246
Monolithic columns have large surface areas, good permeability and well controlled
247
porosity and ease-of-use. Have attractive features for stationary phase for SPAD These
248
characteristics provide highly reproducible methods which is the first requirement in analysis.
249
However, only a few applications have been reported for monolithic solid phases for SPAD
250
applications.
251
dimethacrylate) (poly(MAA-co-EDMA) monolithic solid support to analyze S-Nitrosothiols in a
252
SPAD
253
(dimethylamino)ethanethioate] triphenylphosphine (EDMA) to the surface of monolith via ion
254
exchange interactions between the amino group of the derivatizing reagent and the carboxyl
AC C
245
Wang
based
and
method.
co-workers
The
[22]
authors
used
attached
a
poly(methacrylic
the
derivatizing
acid-co-ethylene
reagent
2-[1-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 9 group of the monolithlic solid phase. S-Nitrosothiols were derivatized on the surface of the solid
256
phase and extracted for LC-MS analysis. In this approach the derivatizing reagent was attached
257
to the surface as a result with each extraction the amount of derivatizing reagent attached to the
258
surface decreased and the monolithic column had to be reactivated after each SPAD step for
259
good reproducibility.
RI PT
255
In hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid extraction (HFLLLE) methods the analytes of interest
261
are extracted from the aqueous donor phase to the thin layer of organic solvent impregnated in
262
the pores of the hollow fiber and then to the acceptor phase inside the lumen of the hollow fiber.
263
In the two-phase mode the acceptor solution is an organic solvent and therefore more compatible
264
with GC analysis. The acceptor solution is aqueous in the three-phase mode which is more
265
compatible with LC analysis. The major advantage of the HFLLLE method is very clean extracts
266
resulting from the small pore size of the hollow fiber which prevents interfering substance
267
particles present in the donor phase entering the acceptor phase and due to the low solubility of
268
organic phase present in the pores. HFLLLE methods have been successfully applied to analyze
269
biological and environmental sample with complex matrices.
M AN U
SC
260
Hollow fiber SPAD is another currently exploited technique. Ganjikha at el [23] recently
271
reported a two phase hollow fiber SPAD based method for determination of formaldehyde. The
272
authors derivatized formaldehyde with acetylacetone to form a coloured 3,5-diacetyl1,4-
273
dihydrolutidine.
274
ammonium acetate buffer solution to the donor phase. The intensity of the colour was measured
275
by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. In a recent three-phase hollow fiber SPAD based method
276
sarcosine was analyzed in human urine [24]. The authors used 4-dimethylarminoazobenzene-4-
277
sulfonyl chloride (DMSCL) as derivatizing reagent. Derivatized sarcosine in human urine was
278
finally analyzed by LC-UV.
EP
The authors added the derivatizing reagent acetylacetone dissolved in
AC C
279
TE D
270
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) based
280
methods have been widely used in forensic applications, analysis of large biomolecules and
281
metabolites [13]. However, to our knowledge there is only a single SPAD based MALDI-MS
282
method reported in literature. Authors placed a single hair sample on a MALDI glass plate and
283
then sprayed the derivatizing reagent 2-fluoro-1-Methylpyridinium p-tolunesolfonate (FMTPS).
284
Using a laser beam (355 nm, 1 kHz) cannabinoids in the hair sample were simultaneously
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 10 285
derivatized and desorbed to the mass spectrometer for analysis. Derivatization step greatly
286
improved detection of cannabinoids. Another alternative to conventional SPE is magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE)
288
where a magnetic or magnetizable sorbent can be dispersed in sample solution thereby increases
289
the interfacial area between sorbent and sample. After analytes are extracted the magnetic
290
sorbent is separated from the sample matrix by applying an external magnetic field. Zheng and
291
co-workers [25] combined MSPE and AD in a SPAD based method for oleanolic and ursolic
292
acid analysis. Fe3O4/GO was used as the solid sorbent material, after analyte extraction and
293
derivatization the solid sorbent was separated from sample with an external magnet. Ability to
294
separate the solid sorbent from sample solution with the aid of an external magnetic field reduces
295
solvent requirements compared to conventional SPE methods.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
287
One of the markers of adulterated dairy products is L-hydroxyproline. Zheng and co-
297
workers [26] reported a method where magnetic separation and surface molecular imprinting
298
combined for the analysis of L-hydroxyproline in dairy products. In this work N-
299
hydroxysuccinimidyl rhodamine B ester (RBS) was used as a derivatizing reagent. A RBS-L-
300
hydroxyproline derivative was used a template to prepare a magnetic molecular imprinted
301
polymer (MMIP). Authors validated the proposed method for L-hydroxyproline in dairy
302
products. The overview of this novel MMIP based SPAD method is shown in figure 2.
TE D
296
304
Microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS) is a miniaturized extraction method, a variant
305
of conventional SPE [27]. In MEPS few milligrams (typically 1-4 mg) of sorbent materiel is
306
packed into a cartridge that is built into a syringe needle. Major advantages of this method are
307
low organic solvent consumption and low sample volume requirements. Klimowska and co-
308
workers reported [27] a MEPS based SPAD method for the analysis of pyrethroid metabolites in
309
human urine samples. The authors packed 4 mg of C18 sorbent to a cartridge that was built into a
310
syringe at the end. A hydrolyzes urine sample was passed through the cartridge for analyte
311
adsorption to the sorbent. The cartridge was dried under vacuum and then the two derivatizing
312
reagents diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC) and 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) dissolved
313
in hexane was passed through the cartridge for simultaneous on-column derivatization and
314
extraction. The derivatives were analyzed in GC-MS. Authors reported LLOQ values 0.06 to
315
0.08 ng/ml for the pyrethroid metabolites in human urine.
AC C
EP
303
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 11 4. Future directions of SPAD
317
A literature search using reference manager and the algorithm: derivatization; and
318
chromatography or mass spectrometry; and 2018 identified 379 references. Review of the first
319
40 stations, 35 described AD methods. Only one reference used SPMAD. The technique
320
remains a viable option for a wide variety of analysis. There is thus ample opportunity to
321
improve many analytical methods using SPMAD or SPAD.
RI PT
316
A small subset of existing methods where SPMAD or SPAD could be advantageous cover a
323
wide range of analytes and scope of relevance to human health and disease. The analytes include
324
and include lactic acid [28], testosterone [29] and volatile [30] emissions from human airway cell
325
cultures. Lactic acids metabolite closely linked to mitochondrial function and is a possible
326
energy source for cancer cells. A current method for determination of this low molecular weight
327
and highly water-soluble compound utilizes derivatization with ethyl chloroformate (EC) but
328
with a relatively complex procedure and in aqueous solution.
329
impregnated with EC could greatly simplify the sample preparation.
330
testosterone to form picolinates [31,32] provides a proton affinitive derivatization which
331
improves sensitivity of mass spectrometry.
332
importance of testosterone measurements to human health, it would be useful to have more rapid
333
and facile methods [29]. The volatiles in human airway cell cultures include intermediate chain
334
acids, alcohols and carbonyls as well as alkanes [30]. A multifunctional derivatization coupled
335
such as was reported for the sialic acids would assist these important studies.
M AN U
SC
322
A fiber or particle phase Derivatization of
TE D
The procedures are complex and given the
6 Conclusions.
337
The ability of SPMAD and SPAD to improve chromatographic separation, sensitivity,
338
selectivity and overall quality of analysis is well documented. Combining AD and extraction
339
process are combined into one single step fulfills many aspects of a good sample preparation
340
method. Low organic solvent usage, ease of automation with any chromatographic system,
341
economical and applicability in analytical methods in a wide range of sample matrices are
342
attractive features of SPAD. Emerging solid phases and chemical reagents provide future
343
challenges and opportunities that will draw the interests of analytical scientists and scientists that
344
use the developed techniques and methods.
AC C
EP
336
345 346
7. References
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 12 347
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[1] S.N. Atapattu, J.M. Rosenfeld, Solid phase analytical derivatization as a sample preparation method. J. of chromatogr. A 1296 (2013) 204-213. [2] J.M. Rosenfeld, Solid-phase analytical derivatization: enhancement of sensitivity and selectivity of analysis. J. of chromatogr. A 843 (1999) 19-27. [3] S.N. Atapattu, J.M. Rosenfled, Solid Phase Analytical Derivatization, in, Reference Module in Chemistry, Molecular Sciences and Chemical Engineering, 2018. [4] S. Yang, E. Jankowska, M. Kosikova, H. Xie, J. Cipollo, Solid-Phase Chemical Modification for Sialic Acid Linkage Analysis: Application to Glycoproteins of Host Cells Used in Influenza Virus Propagation. Analytical chemistry 89 (2017) 9508-9517. [5] S. Yang, W.W. Wu, R.F. Shen, M. Bern, J. Cipollo, Identification of Sialic Acid Linkages on Intact Glycopeptides via Differential Chemical Modification Using IntactGIG-HILIC. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 29 (2018) 1273-1283. [6] J.M. Rosenfeld, M. Mureika-Russel, A. Phatak, Marcoreticular resin XAD-2 as a catalyst for the simultaneous extraction and derivatization of organic acids. J. of Chromatogr. 283 (1984) 127–135. [7] J.M. Rosenfeld, M. Mureika-Russel, M. Love, Solid preparation method for prostaglandins: integration of procedures for isolation and derivatization for gas chromatographic determination. J. of Chromatogr. 469 (1989) 263-272. [8] L. Pan, M. Adams, J. Pawliszyn, Determination of fatty acids using solid phase microextraction. Anal. Chem., 67 (1995) 4396–4403. [9] S. M. Breckenridge, X. Yin, J.M. Rosenfeld, Y.H. Yu, Analytical derivatizations of volatile and hydrophilic carbonyls from aqueous matrix onto a solid phase of a polystyrene– divinylbenzene macroreticular resin. J. Chromatogr. B 694 (1997) 289–296. [10] S.S. H. Ho, J. Z. Yu, Feasibility of Collection and Analysis of Airborne Carbonyls by OnSorbent Derivatization and Thermal Desorption. Anal. Chem. 74 (2002) 1232–1240. [11] H. L. Lord, J. Rosenfeld, V. Volovich, D. Kumbhare, B. Parkinson, Determination of malondialdehyde in human plasma by fully automated solid phase analytical derivatization. J. of Chromatogr. B, 877 (2009) 1292–1298. [12] S.N. Atapattu, J.N. Fortuna, J.M. Rosenfeld, Effect of Tetrabutylammonium Cation on Solid-Phase Analytical Derivatization as a Function of Analyte Lipophilicity. Chromatographia 75 (2012) 47-54. [13] E. Beasley, S. Francese, T. Bassindale, Detection and Mapping of Cannabinoids in Single Hair Samples through Rapid Derivatization and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Analytical chemistry 88 (2016) 10328-10334. [14] E. Takeo, R. Sasano, S. Shimma, T. Bamba, E. Fukusaki, Solid-phase analytical derivatization for gas-chromatography-mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering 124 (2017) 700-706. [15] S.-F. Yuan, Z.-H. Liu, H.-X. Lian, C.-T. Yang, Q. Lin, H. Yin, Z. Dang, Simultaneous determination of eleven estrogenic and odorous chloro- and bromo-phenolic compounds in surface water through an automated online headspace SPME followed by on-fiber derivatization coupled with GC/MS. Analytical Methods 9 (2017) 4819-4827. [16] C. Sala, C. Medana, R. Pellegrino, R. Aigotti, F.D. Bello, G. Bianchi, E. Davoli, Dynamic measurement of Newly formed carbonyl compounds in vapors from electronic cigarattes. European journal of mass spectrometry 23 (2) (2017) 64-69.
AC C
348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 13
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
[17] R. Lopez-Serna, D. Marin-de-Jesus, R. Irusta-Mata, P.A. Garcia-Encina, R. Lebrero, M. Fdez-Polanco, R. Munoz, Multiresidue analytical method for pharmaceuticals and personal care products in sewage and sewage sludge by online direct immersion SPME on-fiber derivatization - GCMS. Talanta 186 (2018) 506-512. [18] S. Dugheri, A. Bonari, I. Pompilio, M. Colpo, M. Montalti, N. Mucci, G. Arcangeli, Assessment of occupational exposure to gaseous peracetic acid. International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health (2018). [19] T. Franklin, L. Perry, W.-C. Shih, J. Yu, Detection of phytocannabinoids from buccal swabs by headspace solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analytical Methods 10 (2018) 942-946. [20] M. Pinto, M. Frena, L.A. Dos Santos Madureira, Solvent-free method for the determination of lignin-derived phenols in sediments. Journal of separation science 40 (2017) 20022008. [21] J. Huang, C. Ou, F. Lv, Y. Cao, H. Tang, Y. Zhou, N. Gan, Determination of aliphatic amines in food by on-fiber derivatization solid-phase microextraction with a novel zeolitic imidazolate framework 8-coated stainless steel fiber. Talanta 165 (2017) 326331. [22] X. Wang, C.T. Garcia, G. Gong, J.S. Wishnok, S.R. Tannenbaum, Automated Online Solid-Phase Derivatization for Sensitive Quantification of Endogenous SNitrosoglutathione and Rapid Capture of Other Low-Molecular-Mass S-Nitrosothiols. Analytical chemistry 90 (2018) 1967-1975. [23] M. Ganjikhah, S. Shariati, E. Bozorgzadeh, Preconcentration and spectrophotometric determination of trace amount of formaldehyde using hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction based on derivatization by Hantzsch reaction. Iranian Chemical Society 14 (2017) 763-769. [24] Y. Huang, X. Huang, L. Huang, Q. Liu, Y. Lei, L. Yang, L. Huang, Three-phase solvent bar liquid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography to determine sarcosine in human urine. Journal of separation science (2018). [25] Z. Zheng, X.E. Zhao, S. Zhu, J. Dang, X. Qiao, Z. Qiu, Y. Tao, Simultaneous Determination of Oleanolic Acid and Ursolic Acid by in Vivo Microdialysis via UHPLCMS/MS Using Magnetic Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction Coupling with MicrowaveAssisted Derivatization and Its Application to a Pharmacokinetic Study of Arctiumlappa L. Root Extract in Rats. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 66 (2018) 3975-3982. [26] L. Zheng, X.E. Zhao, W. Ji, X. Wang, Y. Tao, J. Sun, Y. Xu, X. Wang, S. Zhu, J. You, Core-shell magnetic molecularly imprinted polymers used rhodamine B hydroxyproline derivate as template combined with in situ derivatization for the specific measurement of L-hydroxyproline. J. of chromatogr. A 1532 (2018) 30-39. [27] A. Klimowska, B. Wielgomas, Off-line microextraction by packed sorbent combined with on solid support derivatization and GC-MS: Application for the analysis of five pyrethroid metabolites in urine samples. Talanta 176 (2018) 165-171. [28] H.-Y. Zhanga, P.-P. Zhang, X.-X. Tan, Z.-Z Wang, K.-Q. Lian, X.-D. X, W.-J. Kang Derivatization method for the quantification of lactic acid in cell culture media via gas chromatography and applications in the study of cell glycol metabolism J. of Chromatogr. B 1090 (2018) 22–35 [29] K.I.Ohno, T.Hasegawa, T.Tamura, H.Utsumi, K.Yamashita, Proton Affinitive Derivatization for Highly Sensitive Determination of Testosterone and
AC C
392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 14
RI PT
Dihydrotestosterone in Saliva Samples by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Anal. Sci. 34 (2018) 10171021. [30] M. S. Yamaguchi, M.M. McCartney, A. L. Linderholm, S.E. Ebeler, M. Schivo, C. E. Davis, Headspace sorptive extraction-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method to measure volatile emissions from human airway cell cultures. J. of Chromatogr. B 1090 (2018) 36–42. [31] S.Gorityala, S.Yang, M.M.Montano, Y.Xu, Simultaneous determination of dihydrotestosterone and its metabolites in mouse sera by LC-MS/MS with chemical derivatization.J. Chromatogr. B 1090 (2018) 22-35. [32] T.Zang, D.Tamae, C.Mesaros, Q.Wang, M.Huang, I.A.Blair, T.M.Penning, Simultaneous quantitation of nine hydroxy-androgens and their conjugates in human serum by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 165 (2017) 342-355.
SC
438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451
FIGURE LEGEND
TE D
Fig. 1. Concept and scheme optimized in this study. Two kinds of solid phase resins were combined in a solid phase for metabolomics study. Reproduced with permission from Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering VOL. 124 No. 6, 700-706, 2017
EP
Fig.2.The overview of the MMIP based SPAD method. Reproduced with permission from Journal of Chromatography A 1532 (2018) 30-39.
AC C
453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465
M AN U
452
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 01: Some of the significant milestones in SPAD Year Some of the significant milestones in SPAD
1989
First SPAD report where organic acids were extracted and derivatized simultaneously in a XAD-2 phase [6] Isolation and derivatization of prostaglandins from biological matrices [7]
1995
SPME on-fiber derivatization for fatty acid analysis [8]
1997
Analysis of volatile and hydrophilic carbonyls from aqueous matrix on a XAD-2 phase [9] Airborne carbonyls using a Tenax sorbent packed tube [10]
RI PT
1984
SC
2002
Determination of malondialdehyde in human plasma in a fully automated SPAD method [11] Use of tetrabutylammonium cation as a phase transfer to the analysis of phenols and organic acids in two-step one-pot derivatization method [12]. First report on MALDI based SPAD method [13]
M AN U
2009 2012 2016
Metabolite analysis in a SPAD method combining a strong anion-exchange resin and a strong anion exchange resin [14]
TE D
2017
Table 02: Derivatization methods using SPMAD. Analyte
Reagent
Isobutyl chloroformate
EP
aliphatic amines
Analytical
Matrix
Instrument GC-MS
Food samples [21]
BSTFA
GC-FID
Sediments [20]
carbonyl compounds
PFBHA
GC-MS
Vapor from electronic
AC C
lignin-derived phenols
cigarettes [16]
phenolic compounds
BSTFA
GC-MS
Surface water [15]
peracetic acid
MTS
GC-MS
Airborne sample [18]
and MTBSTFA
GC-MS
Sewage and sewage
pharmaceuticals
personal care product Phytocannabinoids
sludge [17] MSTFA
GC-MS
Buccal swabs [19]
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 03: Applications of particle based SPAD methods Analyte
Reagent
Analytical
Solid phase
Matrix
Two ion exchange
Human plasma [14]
Instrument Methoxyamine
GC-MS
Sialic
resins
acid EDC,HBot, Ethanol
LC-MS
Amino linked resin
Glycoproteins [5]
acid EDC,HBot, Ethanol
MALDI
Amino linked resin
Glycoproteins [4]
UV-Vis spectrometer LC-UV
SC
/MSTFA
LC-MS/MS
linkage Sialic
RI PT
Metabolites
formaldehyde
Acetylacetone
sarcosine
DMSCL
L-
RBS
Hydroxyproline cannabinoids
FMTPS
Ursolic acid and CPR Oleanolic acid
Hollow fiber
Aqueous samples [23]
Hollow fiber
Human urine [24]
Magnetic polymer
milk powder, liquid
M AN U
linkage
MALDI-ESI
milk [26]
MALDI glass plate
Human hair [13]
LC-MS
Metal oxide
Rat blood [25]
EDMA
LC-MS
Monolith column
Mouse blood [22]
Pyrethroid
DIC and HFIP
GC-MS
C18 stationary
Urine samples [27]
EP
metabolites
TE D
S-Nitrosothiols
phase
HBot: hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate
EDC:N-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimidehydrochloride
AC C
RBS: N-hydroxysuccinimidyl rhodamine B ester FMTPS: 2-fluoro-1-Methylpyridinium p-tolunesolfonate FMOC: 9-flurenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride CPR: 2’-carbonyl-piperazine rhodamine B DIC: diisopropylcarbodiimide HFIP: 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
Fig. 1. Concept and scheme optimized in this study. Two kinds of solid phase resins were combined in a solid phase for metabolomics study. Reproduced with permission from Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering VOL. 124 No. 6, 700-706, 2017
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC C
Fig. 2. The overview of the MMIP based SPAD method. Reproduced with permission from Journal of Chromatography A 1532 (2018) 30-39.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Highlights ► Overview of sample preparation methods ► Overview of analytical derivatizations.
RI PT
► Applications of Solid phase analytical derivatizations in analysis.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
► The mechanistic aspects of Solid phase analytical derivatizations.