Accepted Manuscript Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion
Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu, Yiming Zhang, Hongxun Zhang PII: DOI: Reference:
S0166-5162(18)30619-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.12.004 COGEL 3133
To appear in:
International Journal of Coal Geology
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
6 July 2018 7 December 2018 10 December 2018
Please cite this article as: Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu, Yiming Zhang, Hongxun Zhang , Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion. Cogel (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.coal.2018.12.004
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1
Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the
2
physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion
3
Bobo Wanga, Zhisheng Yua,b,*
[email protected], Yiming Zhangc, Hongxun Zhanga
4
a
5
Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, P.R. China
6
b
7
Road, Beijing 100085, P. R. China
8
c
RI
NU
MA
Environmental Protection Bureau of Shunyi District, Beijing 101300, China
15
AC C
12
14
ED
Corresponding Author.
EP T
*
11
13
SC
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing
9
10
PT
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 A
16 17
Abstract
18
The relationships among the production of methane, the physicochemical properties of coal, and
19
the composition of microbial communities are poorly understood in methanogenic bioconversion.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
In this study, we investigated the changes in microbial communities during the methanogenic
21
process of coal based on culture-dependent methods as well as the physicochemical properties of
22
the coal samples. The process of methane production could be clearly divided into four phases (lag,
23
log, peak, and stationary phases). The initial bacterial communities in the cultivation were
24
predominantly Bacteroidales, Actionmycetales, and Bacillales; the archaeal community was
25
present at values below the detection limit. However, distinct changes in bacterial communities
26
were noted at the log phase of methane production. Bacteroides species accounted for more than
27
80% of the total bacterial community, and acetotrophic Methanosarcina was the only archaeal
28
community. Interestingly, Clostridiales increased considerably during the first 2 weeks, but
29
decreased thereafter, indicating that Clostridiales may play a unique role during the initial stage of
30
methanogenic coal bioconversion. Furthermore, the final coal sample showed decreased C and O
31
contents and increased N and H contents. Volatile and ash contents as well as microporosity were
32
also higher than those in the initial state. These results suggested that methanogenic coal
33
bioconversion was a complex biochemical process and that the physicochemical properties of coal
34
were altered in methanogenic bioconversion. Moreover, these findings may facilitate the
35
development of strategies to improve the production of biomethane utilizing coal.
36
Keywords: coal; biomethane; microbial community structure; bioconversion; methanogenesis
38 39 40 41
RI
SC
NU
MA
ED
EP T
AC C
37
PT
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
42
1. Introduction
44
Coalbed methane (CBM) has become an important non-conventional energy resource worldwide
45
(Moore, 2012; Strąpoć et al., 2011). Two mechanisms for the production of CBM have been
46
identified, i.e., thermogenic and biogenic processes (Rightmire et al., 1984). Due to its underlying
47
environmental and industrial advantages relative to physical and chemical methods of coal
48
transformations (Fallgren et al., 2013; Hosseini and Wahid, 2013), coal bioconversion to methane
49
may have broad applications in the clean energy field.
NU
SC
RI
PT
43
Methane in coal seams is generated in subsurface and deep coal basins by thermogenic,
51
geological, or microbial breakdown of complicated coal high molecular polymers (biogenesis)
52
(Fakoussa and Hofrichter, 1999; Harris et al., 2008). Many reports have confirmed the biogenic
53
origins of CBM in some CBM reservoirs through isotope analysis and suggested that real-time
54
methane production occurs in in-situ coal seams (Butland and Moore, 2008; Golding et al., 2013;
55
Hamilton et al., 2014; Susilawati et al., 2013). To this end, CBM researchers have focused on how
56
to stimulate methane production in situ by promoting the activity of native microbial communities
57
to degrade coal. These real-time methane bioreactors have been evaluated in several coal bas ins
58
worldwide, such as the Powder River coal basin, Qinshui coal basin, Illinois basin, and Surat basin
59
(Green et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2012; Papendick et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016b). In addition, a
60
number of studies using culture-independent and -dependent methods have revealed that the
61
presence of extensive microbial populations can generate methane from coal in the laboratory
62
(Guo et al., 2012; McIntosh et al., 2008; Penner et al., 2010; Rathi et al., 2015; Robbins et al.,
63
2016; Zhang et al., 2016a). These studies have verified that clean bioenergy methane can be
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
50
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
64
obtained via coal bioconversion. Methanogenic coal bioconversion is the consequence of coal and microbial community
66
interactions. A detailed analysis of the dynamics of microbial community composition is necessary
67
to determine the complicated synergistic or antagonistic effects of these processes in communities
68
and to improve the efficiency and stability of biomethane production. Despite improvements in
69
our understanding of the characteristics of microbial communities, we still have a very limited
70
understanding of the dynamic changes of microbial communities responsible for this process
71
(Susilawati et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018) and little is known about changes in the
72
physicochemical properties of coal during methanogenic coal bioconversion by the indigenous
73
methanogenic consortia.
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
65
A putative metabolic pathway involved in bioconversion of coal to methane has been
75
proposed by Strapoc et al. based on their studies and previous work in other laboratories (Jones et
76
al., 2010; Strąpoć et al., 2011). They suggested that coal degradation to methane begins with
77
hydrolysis of aromatic, polyaromatic and other hydrocarbon substrates into alcohols, volatile fatty
78
acids, and other organic acids. These organic acids are further degraded into methanogenic
79
substrates, such as methanol, H2 /CO2 , and acetate. Bacterial species from Clostridium, Pelobacter,
80
Bacteroides and Spirochaetes were often detected in the coal seam environment and associated
81
production waters, which are involved in fermentation, sulfur metabolism, hydrogen, and
82
hydrocarbons hydrolysis (Aklujkar et al., 2012; Sträuber et al., 2012; Wrighton et al., 2012).
83
Methanogenic communities are composed of three types of functional metabolic consortia,
84
including fermenting, syntrophic and methanogenic species (Iram et al., 2017). The most common
85
substrates for methanogenic species in biomethane production are hydrogen/carbon dioxide,
AC C
EP T
ED
74
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
acetate, and C1 compounds. In terms of these different types of substrates, methanogenic species
87
can be classified as hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic, and methylotrophic (Meslé et al., 2013; Penger
88
et al., 2012). In addition, exceptions to these common substrates are different methoxylated
89
aromatic compounds, which are substrates for Methermicoccus sp. (Mayumi et al., 2016). These
90
various types of methanogenesis suggest that different methanogenic communities induce distinct
91
and extensive methanogenic processes.
RI
PT
86
In this study, we established an anaerobic bioreactor to perform methanogenic coal
93
bioconversion and monitor methane production, and we used this reactor to assess changes in
94
bacterial and archaeal community compositions during different phases of methane production.
95
In addition, we examined changes in the physicochemical properties of coal. These results
96
provide important insights into the optimization of strategies to improve the production of
97
biomethane utilizing coal.
98
2. Materials and Methods
99
2.1 Sampling site
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
92
The Huaibei Coalfield is a primary coal field located in Anhui province, China (Fig. 1).
101
Annual production of coal is over 30 million tons. Most coal is used for industrial fuel and by
102
power plants (Zheng et al., 2008).The Luling coal mine is located in Huaibei Coalfield with three
103
main work seams (seams 8-10). The CBM of Luling coal mine is mixed with secondary biogenic
104
gas, and the no. 8 seam has high abundant reserves of coal and methane (Zhou et al., 2014). Thus,
105
this seam was the target for analysis of methanogenic coal bioconversion in this study. The
106
estimated proportion of thermogenic gas is ranged from 48.54% to 52.15% in the no. 8 coal seam
107
of the Luling coal mine, whereas that of biogenic gas ranged from 47.85% to 51.46% (Bao et al.,
AC C
100
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2014).
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
108
109
ED
111
Fig. 1. Location of the Huaibei coal mine used for sample collection.
2.2 Sample collection and preparation
EP T
110
The collected coal samples were obtained from the inside of newly exposed mining faces to
113
minimize the oxygenation degree of coal samples. Fresh coal samples were placed in sterilized
114
glass bottles and stored at 4 °C in an anaerobic chamber before culture. In the laboratory, the coal
115
was ground to coal powder using a mortar and pestle and sieved through a 200-mesh sieve to
116
collect fractions containing particles less than 250 μm in diameter in an anaerobic chamber
117
(XinmiaoYQX-11; Shanghai, China). The coal powder was separated into two parts, which were
118
used for analysis of physicochemical properties and for bioconversion. The coal powder was used
119
as the sole energy and carbon substrate. Analysis of the physicochemical properties of the coal
120
sample was performed by the Test Center of the China Coal Research Institute in Beijing. A
AC C
112
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
continuous drainage system was used to drain formation water from the underground mine. The
122
formation water sample used as the inoculum was collected in sterilized polyethylene bottles
123
anaerobically. The autoclaved bottles were sealed tightly with butyl rubber stoppers and flushed
124
with nitrogen gas as reported previously (Susilawati et al., 2015). In the laboratory, the formation
125
water sample (3 L) was filtered through sterile 0.22 μm pore-size hydrophobic membrane filters
126
(Whatman Japan KK, Japan). Membranes containing the filtered microbes from formation water
127
were used for subsequent culture with coal.
128
2.3 Detection of methanogenic coal bioconversion
SC
RI
PT
121
To assess changes in microbial communities during the methanogenic coal bioconversion
130
process, microorganisms from formation water were used as the inoculum, and crushed coal
131
powders were used as the carbon substrate. The basal anaerobic medium contained the following
132
(in g/L): MgSO4 ·7H2O (3.45), KCl (0.335), NH4 Cl (0.25), NaCl (11.0), MgCl2 ·2H2O (2.75),
133
K2 HPO4 (0.14), and CaCl2 ·2H2 O (0.14). In addition, the medium contained 40 ml of 1.25% Na2 S
134
-1.25% cysteine, 1 ml of 0.2% Fe(NH4 )2 (SO4)2, 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), and 10 ml/L each
135
of vitamin solutions and trace metals. The vitamin solution contained the following (in mg/L):
136
pyroxidine HCl (10), folic acid (2), biotin (2), riboflavin (5),thiamine HCl (5), lipobenzoic acid (5),
137
vitamin B12 (0.1), nicotinic acid (5), and lipoic acid (5).The trace mineral solution contained the
138
following (in mg/L): MnCl2 ·4H2 O (100), ZnCl2 (70), FeCl2 ·4H2 O (1,500), H3 BO3 (36),CuCl2 (2),
139
NiCl2 ·6H2 O (24), NaMoO4 (6), CoCl2 ·6H2 O (190), AlK(SO4 )2 (10), and 10 ml/L of 25% HCl.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
129
140
Cultures were prepared in 1-L serum bottles (Shuniu Glass), in which 10 g coal powder
141
substrate was combined with 350 mL autoclaved basal medium. The bottles were capped with
142
butyl rubber stoppers, and the filtered membrane of the formation water as the inoculant was
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
transferred into the autoclaved serum bottles (Fig. 2). Culture bottles without coal powders were
144
used as negative controls (no-coal controls). The headspace of the serum bottles was removed
145
using a vacuum and then flushed with pure N2 three times to remove O2 . Cultures were incubated
146
without shaking at 35°C. The rubber hose, stop valve, and syringe were assembled and crossed
147
through the butyl rubber stopper to collect 2 mL culture solution every week until methane
148
production reached the stationary phase, at which total methane content no longer increased.
149
Before collection, cultures in the bottles were shaken at 100 rpm for 1 h using a magnetic stirring
150
device to mix the culture solution. The collected cultures were stored at -80°C until used for DNA
151
extraction. Cultivations were performed in triplicate. Methane content in the gas collecting bag of
152
the bioreactor was detected weekly using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A; Agilent
153
Technologies, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector.
154
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
143
155
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of bioconversion and extraction process. 1: serum bottle, 2: coal, 3: culture solution and
156
microflora, 4: rubber plug of the serum bottle, 5: stainless steel conduit, 6: screw cap of serum bottle, 7: aluminum
157
foil gas collecting bag, 8: syinger, 9: rubber hose, 10: circulator bath, 11: magnetic stirring device, 12: stop valve,
158
13: gas chromatography, 14: high-throughput sequencing.
159
2.4 Microbial community analysis
160
2.4.1 DNA extraction and amplification
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The archaea and bacteria in the cultures samples were identified using an Illumina
162
HiSeq2500. Collected culture samples were a mixture of three cultures from three independent
163
experiments. Genomic DNA from the collected cultures supplemented with 0.2% Tween 80 was
164
extracted using a FastDNA SPIN kit (Bio101 Systems, USA) according to the manufacturer ’s
165
instructions (Guo et al., 2012). The 16S rRNA genes of archaea and bacteria were used for
166
microbial community analysis. The universal bacterial primer set BAC-515F/907R (Xiong et al.,
167
2012) and archaeal primer set AR-519F/915R (Lane) were used for amplification of 16S rRNA
168
genes of bacteria and archaea, respectively.
169
2.4.2 Library construction and sequencing
NU
SC
RI
PT
161
Purified PCR products were used to construct the DNA library with a TruSeq® DNA
171
PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit according to the manufacturer ’s instructions. Constructed DNA
172
libraries were checked using Qubit and qPCR and then sequenced on a HiSeq2500 PE250
173
platform.
174
2.4.3 Phylogenetic analysis of sequencing data
EP T
ED
MA
170
Chimeric sequences were processed by quality control with Qiime (V1.7.0) (Caporaso et al.,
176
2010). The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined with Uparse software (v7.0.1001,
177
http://drive5.com/uparse/) at a 97% cut-off (Edgar, 2013). The representative sequences for each
178
OTU were compared with the SSUrRNA sequence database (Quast et al., 2013). The obtained
179
bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the NCBI short read archive
180
(SRA) database with Bioproject accession number PRJNA474893.
181
2.5 Low-pressure N2 gas adsorption (LPGA) isotherms and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
182
AC C
175
LPGA experiments were performed on a QuantachromeAutosorb-6B/3B apparatus to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
evaluate the microporosity of coal samples before and after bioconversion. The coal samples
184
(weighing 2 g) for adsorption analysis were outgassed at 120°C for 12 h under high vacuum to
185
remove air and free water. N2 adsorption isotherms of samples kept in liquid nitrogen (77.35 K at
186
101.3 kPa) were obtained for analysis of relative pressure (P/P 0 ; the gas pressure/the saturated
187
vapor pressure) ranging from 0.01 to 0.995. Based on multiple adsorption theories, such as
188
Langmuir, Barrett_Joyner_Halenda, Brunauer_Emmett_Teller, Dubinin_Radushkevich, density
189
functional theory and Dubinin_Astakhov (Clarkson and Bustin, 1999; Webb and Orr, 1997), pore
190
structure parameters were calculated by the computer software. A specific description of these
191
techniques and theories was documented by Kakei et al. (Kakei et al., 1990).
NU
SC
RI
PT
183
In order to characterize the porosity of coal samples, developed scanning electron microscopy
193
(SEM) methodology was adopted (Klaver et al., 2012). Coal samples collected before and after
194
bioconversion were observed by field emission-SEM (Quanta 200F). SEM observations were
195
conducted at the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of Peking University.
196
2.5 Statistical analysis
EP T
ED
MA
192
Statistical tests based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the method of least significant
198
differences at the 5% level were used to determine significant differences in the chemical
199
composition of coal before and after bioconversion. All statistical analyses were performed with
200
SPSS 17.0.
201
3. Results
202
3.1 Methane production
AC C
197
203
Significantly greater methane content (p < 0.001) was produced from continuous cultivations
204
of coal powder cultured with inoculum filtered from formation water (test group, 63.8 μmol CH4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT g−1 coal; Fig. 3) compared with that from no coal controls (0.2 μmol CH4 g−1 coal; data not
206
shown). For the entire culturing process, methane production could be clearly divided into four
207
phases (lag phase, log phase, peak phase, and stationary phase; Fig. 3) in the test group.
208
Specifically, methane production increased slowly until week 3. After week 3, methane production
209
increased dramatically and continued until week 5. After week 5, methane production began to
210
decrease and was stopped at week 8 when no increased methane production was detected in all
211
repeated experimental controls (Fig. 3).
212
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
205
Fig. 3. Plots of average methane production from coal bio conversion during the 9-week cultivation using coal and
214
inoculum filtered from production water. Error bars represent standard deviation for replicates tubes.
215
3.2 Changes in the coal physicochemical properties of coal
AC C
213
216
When the methane yield no longer increased in methanogenic coal bioconversion, we found
217
that abundant amounts of coal substrate remained in the bioreactor. Thus, we then examined
218
changes in the physicochemical properties of coal after methanogenic coal biotransformation. As
219
shown in Table 1, ultimate analysis revealed that coal sample from the Luling coal mine is
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
characterised by high proportions of carbon, and low proportions of hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur,
221
and oxygen. The volatile matter and ash yields were quite high, up to 30.25% and 14.67%. The
222
coal macerals were composed of liptinite, inertinite, vitrinite, and mineral matter. Inertinite and
223
vitrinite contents in coal samples were quite high, whereas the liptinite contents and mineral
224
matter were relatively low. In addition, coal samples from the no. 8 coal seam had a reflectance
225
(Ro, max) of 0.82% ± 0.05%. According to the Chinese classification (GB5751-86) (Chen, 2000),
226
coal samples from the Luling coal mine in this study w ere classified as bituminous. The coal
227
sample after bioconversion had higher volatile matter and ash, contents and hydrogen, and
228
nitrogen contents than the origin coal sample, whereas the carbon, oxygen, and fixed carbon
229
contents were decreased. The significance of the change of each chemical component was also
230
confirmed by the ANOVA (Table 1). The p value for each chemical components of coal was lower
231
than 0.05 except sulfur, which implied that all of the tested chemical components, except sulfur,
232
underwent significant changes after bioconversion. All ANOVA analysis results are available in
233
supplementary material file (Table S1).
234
Table 1. ANOVA analysis for chemical components of coals coal samples before and after bioconversion.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
220
Yield (%)a
Analysis
BEFORE
SSb
df
M Sb
F value
p value
AFTER
Proximate analyses (dry) % M oisture
14.67±0.02
16.04±0.05
2.84
1
2.84
1688.64
2.10*10-6
30.25±0.03
32.58±0.06
8.13
1
8.13
59675.86
1.68*10-9
55.08±0.06
51.38±0.07
20.52
1
20.52
14625.32
2.80*10-9
Ash Volatile matter Fixed carbon
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Ultimate analysis vol. (dry ash free)%
81.74±0.
Carbon
79.13±0.09
10.25
1
10.25
4664.85
2.75*10-7
13 4.46±0.02
6.95±0.05
9.29
1
9.28
10685.16
5.25*10-8
Nitrogen
1.48±0.03
2.96±0.02
3.27
1
3.27
7736.12
1.00*10-7
Sulfur
0.12±0.02
0.15±0.02
0.001
1
0.001
5.57
0.0776
Oxygen
12.19±0.04
10.81±0.05
2.83
1
2.83
1846.12
1.75*10-6
PT
Hydrogen
51.7
--
Liptinite
44.3
--
Inertinite
1.6
--
2.4
--
0.82±0.05
--
SC
Vitrinite
RI
Petrographic analysis vol.%
matter Reflectance
NU
M ineral
(Ro, max)% bituminous
MA
Classfication a
Each value shown represents the mean±(SD) of three individual experiments.
236
b
SS, between-groups sum of squares. M S, between-groups mean squares.
ED
235
Low-pressure N2 gas adsorption/desorption analysis was used to evaluate the microporosity
238
of coal in this study. The LPGA isotherms for coal samples before and after bioconversion are
239
shown in Fig. 4. The remaining coal substrate exhibited higher adsorption, adsorbing most N2 (> 4
240
cm3 /g) at the highest pressure (Fig. 4b), whereas the original coal sample absorbed little N2 (< 1
241
cm3 /g), indicating minor microporosity. These results demonstrated that there were significant
242
differences in coal microporosity before and after bioconversion.
AC C
EP T
237
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(b)
PT
(a)
Fig. 4. LP-N 2GA isotherms for coal samples before (a) and after bioconversion (b).
SC
244
RI
243
Furthermore, SEM was then performed to supplement the results of LPGA isotherms analysis.
246
The combination of SEM observations and LPGA could provide clearer insights into the
247
microporosity and pore shape of coal (Nie et al., 2015). The surface images of the coal samples
248
before and after bioconversion were enlarged 12,000 times; representative images are shown in
249
Fig. 5. The remaining coal substrate samples showed a highly porous structure with numerous
250
typical slit-shaped pores compared with the original coal samples. Few open pores were observed
251
in the original coal samples (Fig. 5a), supporting the smaller hysteresis loops in Fig. 4a. The
252
increased numbers of slit-shaped pores supported the increased microporosity of coal after
253
bioconversion. The results of SEM observation were quite consistent with the LPGA isotherm
254
analysis.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
245
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (a)
5.0 μm
5.0 μm
PT
5.0 μm
SC
RI
(b)
5.0 μm
NU
5.0 μm
255
5.0 μm
Fig. 5. Representative SEM images of coal samples before (a) and after (b) bioconversion. The slit-shaped pores are
257
indicated by white arrows. The scanning electron microscope was operating at 10 kV.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
256
258 259
Fig. 6 SEM image of microbial attachment to the coal after bioconversion. The rod shaped and spherical cells are
260
indicated by red and yellow arrows, respectively. The scanning electron microscope was operating at 10 kV.
261
In addition, SEM observations also intuitively showed that a number of microbes adhered to
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
the coal matrix after bioconversion (Fig. 6). The agglomeration and adhes ion of two different
263
cellular morphotypes were apparent in the SEM images, the most abundant being 2-4 μm rod
264
shaped cells. The other morphotype was spherical cells measuring approximately 1 μm. These
265
morphotypes were primarily located on or near the cracks of the coal surface.
266
3.3 Dynamic analysis of microbial communities
PT
262
In order to elucidate dynamic changes in microbial communities during methanogenic coal
268
bioconversion, a deep assessment of the microbial communities in the collected culture solution
269
every week in the bioreactor was performed by high-throughput sequencing. In total, 1,197,930
270
(676,697 + 521,433) qualitative sequences were obtained. The average sequence lengths of
271
archaea and bacteria were 371 and 359bp, respectively. Q30 for bacteria and archaea ranged from
272
0.96 to 0.99, suggesting high sequencing accuracy. Additional details on the sequencing data are
273
shown in the supplementary information (Table S2).
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
267
Methanogenic coal bioconversion successfully enriched the bacterial and archaeal
275
communities. The phylogenetic classification of bacteria and archaea and their closest genera from
276
all culture points are listed in Table S3. In total, 56 bacterial species and one archaeal species at
277
the genus level were observed during methanogenic coal bioconversion. The microbial
278
communities responsible for coal bioconversion had high bacterial and low archaeal diversities in
279
the bioreactor. Across all cultures and time points, the bacterial sequences were dominated by
280
members of the genera Propionibacterium, Bacillus, and Desulfurispora genera, whereas other
281
species belonging to the genera Pseudomonas,
282
Paenibacillus, and Shewanella were consistently present at low levels (Table S2). For archaeal
283
communities, acetoclastic methanogens from the genera of Methanosarcina were dominant in all
AC C
EP T
274
Paludibacter, Desulfovibrio,
Geovibrio,
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
284
cultures (Fig. 7). The dynamics of microbial communities were analysed in terms of methane production phase
286
during the 9-week cultivation. After the first week of cultivation, Actinomycetales, Bacteroidales,
287
and Bacillales were the most abundant orders, accounting for 55.93%, 14.37%, and 24.14% of
288
total bacteria (Fig. 7a), respectively. After the second week, Actinomycetales, Bacteroidales,
289
Bacillales, and Clostridiales were the most abundant orders, accounting for 49.19%, 14.3%, 9.7%
290
and 25.25% of the total bacteria, respectively. The relative abundance of the total bacteria in the
291
third week was quite different from that in the first and second weeks at the order level. Although
292
the relative abundance of Actinomycetales, Bacillales and Clostridiales accounted for large
293
proportions of the total bacteria, these orders were far more less than that in the second week (Fig.
294
7a). The most abundant order was Bacteroidales, accounting for 77.31% of the total bacteria. After
295
week 3, the relative abundances of the bacteria changed only slightly. Bacteroidales was dominant
296
from week 4 to week 9, whereas orders Actinomycetales and Clostridiales were the main
297
components during these weeks (Fig. 7a). The archaeal community abundance at the genus level is
298
shown in Fig. 7b. During weeks 1 and 2, the archaeal community was below the limit of detection.
299
Subsequently, the acetotrophic Methanosarcina from the order Methanosarcinale was dominant in
300
the archaeal community. As culture time increased, the archaeal relative abundance exhibited a
301
nearly steady state from week 3 to week 9. These results indicated that regular changes in the
302
microbial community structure occurred during methanogenic coal bioconversion.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
285
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
RI
PT
(a)
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
(b)
303
Fig. 7. Relative abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bioreactor from Illumina HiSeq sequencing for
305
bacteria (a) and archaea (b). Archaea were not detected in the first 2 weeks. The sample name in each line
306
represents the collected culture sample in the bioreactor from week 1 to week 9, respectively.
307
AC C
304
308
4. Discussion
309
Many in situ and laboratory-based studies have demonstrated the occurrence of biogenic methane
310
and the methane-forming potential of coal bioconversion; however, a limited understanding of the
311
microorganisms responsible for this process is documented. This was a comprehensive study
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
detailing changes in the structure of the microbial community and the physicochemical properties
313
of coal during methanogenic coal bioconversion in a bioreactor with continuous cultivation. In this
314
process, simulative bioconversion equipment was combined with a sample extraction device to
315
obtain the extraction via in situ culture to avoid disrupting the anaerobic conditions in the
316
bioreactor, thereby ensuring the continuity of the bioconversion process. Our analyses of
317
microbial communities and changes in physicochemical properties of coal showed that
318
methanogenic coal bioconversion is a complex biochemical process.
SC
RI
PT
312
During the 9-week cultivation using coal and inoculum filtered from production water, the
320
process of methane production passed through four phases. During the first 2 weeks, no methane
321
was detected. However, in a study by Rita Susilawati et al., small amounts methane were detected
322
in the lag phase (Susilawati et al., 2015). They suggested that the methane was released from
323
adsorbed methane in the coal substrate. In this study, the adsorbed methane may have been
324
sweeping off by blowing N2 persistently before the reaction started. Although no biomethane was
325
produced, coal bioavailability could be accelerated during this phase, providing the available
326
substrates for methanogens, consequently resulting in methane production. Following the initial
327
lag phase, a typical log phase was also observed for microbial community growth with coal
328
(Fuertez et al., 2017; Susilawati et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018). Significant methane accumulation
329
was detected after week 3, and no increases in methane were observed in no coal controls (data
330
not shown). The methane production from the test groups increased over time until week 8.
331
Although the acetoclastic methanogen Methanosarcina was detected during week 9, the methane
332
yield did not increase. Susilawati et al. suggested that the accumulated toxic by-products from
333
microbial metabolism during long-term cultivation may influence the capacity of the
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
319
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
334
methanogenesis community to transform coal to methane (Susilawati et al., 2015). Significant changes in the physicochemical properties of coal were found during
336
methanogenic coal bioconversion. The remaining coal substrate after bioconversion exhibited
337
increased volatile matter and ash contents, higher hydrogen and nitrogen contents, and increased
338
microporosity, whereas the carbon, oxygen, and fixed carbon contents were decreased. Zhang et al.
339
also found that biotreated coal samples had higher volatile contents than untreated coal in a recent
340
study (Zhang et al., 2017). However, they reported that the carbon and oxygen contents of coal
341
were increased after bioconversion. Differences in changes in the chemical components could be
342
due to the different compositions of coal samples. The increases in N and H contents could be
343
attributed to the ammonia of bacterial strains because of the microbial protein interactions with
344
coal. Increased microporosity was detected by LPGA, and coal after bioconversion showed higher
345
N2 absorption than that before bioconversion. Although it is not easy to view the inner core
346
because of its highly compact structure, SEM can be a well-established technique to determine the
347
morphology of the coal surface (Nie et al., 2015). The SEM results further supported the LPGA
348
experiments. Four types of pore shapes in coal can often be founded under SEM observation.
349
Those are cylindrical pores, slit-shaped pores, wedge-shaped pores, and bottle neck pores. Typical
350
slit-shaped pores were observed in the coal after bioconversion. The emerging slit-shaped pores
351
seem to be intrinsic in the coal. Bioconversion will consume a part of the coal matrix, exposing
352
pores from the inner part of the coal and enlarging the sizes of these intrinsic pores, as showed in
353
Fig. 5. Thus, the microbial activity may contribute to the increased slit-shaped pores, which may
354
facilitate the interaction between coal and microbial communities. However, this hypothesis was
355
based on the observed results and how many pores were exposed and to what extend the pore
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
335
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
volume was enlarged remain unclear. Further studies are needed to quantitatively verify this
357
hypothesis to determine changes in the pore structure. In addition, microbial attachment to the coal
358
was observed in the SEM image. Rod shaped and spherical cells were the major microorganisms.
359
This close attachment presumably indicates a mechanism to maintain cellular interactions with the
360
insoluble carbon utilised by these microorganisms for growth and energy. Similarly, Guo et al.
361
also found spherical bacteria and bacillus to be the dominant microorganisms adhered to the coal
362
surface and suggested a significant positive correlation between microbial adhesion behaviour and
363
coal bioconversion (Guo et al., 2018). Vick et al. found that spherical and rod shaped morphotypes
364
were the most abundant cells attached to the coal disk and that microbial biofilm structure became
365
visible over time (Vick et al., 2016). However, there was no obvious biofilm structure observed on
366
the coal after 9-week culture in this study. This is probably because powdery coal was not
367
conducive to the formation of biofilm.
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
356
The bacterial and archaeal communities were successfully enriched in methanogenic coal
369
bioconversion. Changes in bacterial and archaeal communities were analysed during the different
370
phases. During the lag phase, the predominant bacterial members of the community were
371
Bacteroidales, Actionmycetales, Bacillales, and Clostridiales species. The members of these
372
bacteria can ferment and hydrolyse hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds and have been
373
identified previously in several studies of coal associated enrichment cultures (Midgley et al.,
374
2010; Robbins et al., 2016; Stephen et al., 2014). Thus, these bacteria were likely the primary
375
degraders of coal substrates in the bioreactors. Interestingly, Clostridiales showed an obvious
376
increase during the first 2 weeks and decreased thereafter. This result suggested that Clostridiales
377
may have had a special role during the initial stage of methanogenic coal bioconversion in our
AC C
EP T
368
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
cultures. Several studies have shown that members of Clostridiales contained a family of
379
anaerobic fermentative bacteria, which can degrade aromatic compounds to produce various
380
organic acids (Brenner et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008). Wei et al. (Wei et al., 2014) also found that
381
Clostridiales served as a dominant fermentative bacteria involved in coal biogasification. Thus, the
382
contribution of this order in this study is probably related to organic matter degradation and to
383
organic acid production for syntrophic bacteria, aceticlastic methanogens, or both in the initial
384
phase of methane production. In the log phase, methane production increased promptly and
385
reached the maximum methane production rate at around week 5 in all cultures. Moreover, based
386
on the results from pyrosequencing, the genus Methanosarcina was detected in the extract samples
387
from week 3 to week 9 and was the predominant component with nearly 100% of the sequence
388
reads. Methanosarcina species are the predominant constituents of the archaeal community,
389
consistent with other finding showing Methanosarcina accounts for a large proportion after
390
enrichment culture with coal (Yang et al., 2018). Methanosarcina is a representative acetotrophic
391
methanogen, and the dominance of Methanosarcina throughout the coal bioconversion process
392
strongly suggested that acetotrophic methanogenesis was the main pathway. From week 4 to week
393
9, the relative abundances of bacteria changed slightly, suggesting that the community structure
394
became more stable during methane production. In addition, Propionibacterium species were
395
always present at high proportions over the culture course in coal containing cultures, suggesting
396
that Propionibacterium species likely metabolized substrates directly from the coal. Strains of
397
Propionibacterium were shown to produce propionic acid and acetic acid efficiently from various
398
substrates in fermentation (Babuchowski et al., 1993). Because the proportions of the acetoclastic
399
Methanosarcina had increased after the lag phase, it was likely that this organism syntrophically
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
378
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
400
consumed the acetate being produced by Propionibacterium, which was involved in acetogens.
401
However, further studies are required to identify the specific mechanisms involved in this process.
402
These results suggested that methanogenesis utilized the hydrolysis and fermentation of end
403
products produced by the bacterial components.
PT l
Surat Basin well 1
l
Sydney Basin Well 1
l
k
Bowen Basin
ED
Lithgow State Coal Mine
EP T
404
Sydney Basin(south)
CSMB_4034
j
Dechloromonas sp.
Ishikari Basin
CSMB_839
RI
Fusibacter sp.
i
CSMB_713
Powder River Basin
Dehalobacter sp.
h
CSMB_561
Illinois Basin
Geovibrio sp.
SC
CSMB_219
g
Thauera sp.
Ordos Basin
CSMB_146
Ordos Basin (east)
Geosporobacter sp.
NU
CSMB_101
f
Methanosarcina sp.
e
CSMB_85
Damodar Basin
Bacillus sp.
d
CSMB_31
Canadian Sedimentary Basin
Propionibacterium sp.
c
CSMB_20
MA
Pseudomonas sp.
Jingmen-Dangyang Basin
CSMB_8
b
Acinetobacter sp.
Co-occurance in published studies
Cherokee Basin
CSMB number
a
Taxonomy
Fig. 8 The abundant OTUs in methanogenic bioconversion from the Huaibei coalfield with their assigned CSM B
406
numbers at a 98% similarity cut-off and their co-occurrences (indicated by red squares) across a range of published
407
studies. a (Beckmann et al., 2018), b(Kirk et al., 2015), c (Wei et al., 2014), d(Penner et al., 2010), e (Singh et al.,
408
2012), f(Guo et al., 2012), g(Tang et al., 2012), h(Strąpoć et al., 2008), I(Green et al., 2008), j (Shimizu et al., 2007),
409
k
AC C
405
(Li et al., 2008), l(Vick et al., 2018).
410
Vick et al. have developed a new and easily accessible Coal Seam Microbiome (CSMB)
411
reference set of OTU sequences from the 16S rRNA gene of coal seam microbial communities
412
provided in many published manuscripts (Vick et al., 2018). By mapping the 16S rRNA gene from
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
the Huaibei coalfield in this study to the CSMB reference set, some of the abundant OTUs
414
identified in methanogenic bioconversion were also found have occurred in other coal basins
415
around the world (Fig. 8). Interestingly, both the dominate OTUs matched in the CSMB reference
416
set were not observed in the Canadian sedimentary basin and Damodar basin. Of the co-observed
417
microbes, the uniquely identified archaea Methanosarcina sp. (CSMB_101) from the Huaibei
418
coalfield were ubiquitous and have been found previously in the majority of coal basin
419
environments. Similarly, the proteobacterial bacteria Pseudomonas sp. (CSMB_20), a commonly
420
observed genus has also been observed in the Surat basin, Sydney basin, Bowen basin, and
421
Ishikari basin. Pseudomonas sp. is known to degrade hydrocarbon, alkane, naphthalene, and
422
polyaromatics (Prabhu and Phale, 2003; Ross and Gulliver, 2016). Members of Acinetobacter sp.
423
(CSMB_8) observed in Surat basin, Sydney basin, Bowen basin and Ordos basin have
424
hydrocarbon degradation capacities (Yousaf et al., 2011). The Rhodocyclales order members
425
Thauera sp. (CSMB_219), observed in Surat basin, Bowen basin, and Sydney basin have been
426
reported to denitrify under anaerobic aromatic compound degradation (Shinoda et al., 2004). The
427
proteobacterial bacteria Dechloromonas sp. (CSMB_4034) only co-occurred in the Sydney basin
428
well 1# across the CSMB reference set is involved in degrading aromatic hydrocarbons
429
anaerobically (Chakraborty et al., 2005; Fry et al., 2009), such as benzene, a likely intermediate of
430
coal depolymerisation (Zheng et al., 2017). However, some dominate OTUs were not mapped to
431
the CSMB reference set. For example, Paludibacter sp. belonging to the Bacteroidales order could
432
not map to any members of the CSMB reference set. This uncommon phenomenon indicated that
433
a subset of microorganisms surviving in the Huaibei coalfield may have limited distributions.
434
5. Conclusion
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
413
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
This study systematically showed that the bacterial community structure changed over time during
436
methanogenic coal bioconversion and that acetotrophic methanogens contributed to the maximum
437
biomethane production. Notably, the microbial communities changed obviously during the log
438
phase. What is more, the coal samples after bioconversion showed decreased C and O contents
439
and increased N and H contents, volatile matter, ash contents, and increased microporosity. These
440
findings suggested there are complicated interactions among the production of methane, the
441
physicochemical properties of coal, and the composition of microbial communities. Further
442
studies are required to improve the performance of the main groups of microorganisms involved in
443
order to increase process stability and enhance biogas production.
444
Acknowledgments
445
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (20877098) and the
446
Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB15010200).
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
435
EP T
447
References
449
Aklujkar, M ., Haveman, S.A., DiDonato, R., Chertkov, O., Han, C.S., Land, M.L., Bro wn, P., Lovley,
450
D.R., 2012. The genome of Pelobacter carbinolicus reveals surprising metabolic capabilit ies and
451
physiological features. BMC genomics 13, 690.
452
Babuchowski, A., Hammond, E.G., Glatz, B.A., 1993. Survey of propionibacteria for ability to produce
453
propionic and acetic acids. Journal of food protection 56, 493-496.
454
Bao, Y., Wei, C., Wang, C., Wang, G., Li, Q., 2014. Geochemical characteristics and generation process
455
of mixed biogenic and thermogenic coalbed methane in Luling coalfield, China. Energy & Fuels 28,
456
4392-4401.
AC C
448
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Beckmann, S., Luk, A.W., Gutierrez-Zamo ra, M.-L., Chong, N.H.H., Tho mas, T., Lee, M., Manefield,
458
M., 2018. Long-term succession in a coal seam microbio me during in situ biostimulation of
459
coalbed-methane generation. The ISME journal, 1.
460
Brenner, D., Krieg, N.R., Staley, J., 2005. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Second Edition.
461
Vol.(2), The Proteobacteria part B, The Gammaproteobacteria. Springer Science and Business Media,
462
Inc., New York, USA.
463
Butland, C.I., Moore, T.A., 2008. Secondary biogenic coal seam gas reservoirs in New Zealand: a
464
preliminary assessment of gas contents. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 151-165.
465
Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Sto mbaugh, J., Bitt inger, K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K., Fierer, N.,
466
Pena, A.G., Goodrich, J.K., Go rdon, J.I., 2010. QIIM E allows analysis of high -throughput community
467
sequencing data. Nature methods 7, 335-336.
468
Chakraborty, R., O'Connor, S.M., Chan, E., Coates, J.D., 2005. Anaerobic degradation of benzene,
469
toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene co mpounds by Dechloromonas strain RCB. Applied & Environ mental
470
Microbiology 71, 8649.
471
Chen, P., 2000. Study on integrated classification system for Chinese coal. Fuel processing technology
472
62, 77-87.
473
Clarkson, C., Bustin, R., 1999. The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties
474
of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions. Fuel 78,
475
1333-1344.
476
Edgar, R.C., 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences fro m microbial amplicon reads. Nature
477
methods 10, 996-998.
478
Fakoussa, R., Hofrichter, M., 1999. Biotechnology and microbiology of coal degradation. Applied
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
457
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Microbiology and Biotechnology 52, 25-40.
480
Fallgren, P.H., Jin, S., Zeng, C., Ren, Z., Lu, A., Colberg, P.J., 2013. Co mparison of coal rank for
481
enhanced biogenic natural gas production. International Journal of Coal Geology 115, 92-96.
482
Fry, J.C., Horsfield, B., Sykes, R., Cragg, B.A., Heywood, C., Kim, G.T., Mangelsdorf, K., M ildenhall,
483
D.C., Rinna, J., Vieth, A., 2009. Prokaryotic populations and activities in an interbedded coal deposit,
484
including a previously deeply buried section (1.6–2.3 km) above∼ 150 Ma basement rock.
485
Geomicrobiology Journal 26, 163-178.
486
Fuertez, J., Nguyen, V., McLennan, J.D., Adams, D.J., Han, K. -B., Sparks, T.D., 2017. Optimization of
487
biogenic methane production from coal. International Journal of Coal Geology 183, 14-24.
488
Go lding, S.D., Boreham, C.J., Esterle, J.S., 2013. Stable isotope geochemistry of coal bed and shale gas
489
and related production waters: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology 120, 24-40.
490
Green, M .S., Flanegan, K.C., Gilcrease, P.C., 2008. Characterization of a methanogenic consortium
491
enriched fro m a coalbed methane well in the Powder River Basin, USA. International Journal of Coal
492
Geology 76, 34-45.
493
Guo, H., Dong, Z., Liu, X., Bai, Y., Gao, Z., Xia, D., 2018. Analysis of methanog ens adsorption and
494
biogas production characteristics from different coal surfaces. Environ mental Science and Po llution
495
Research, 1-8.
496
Guo, H., Liu, R., Yu , Z., Zhang, H., Yun, J., Li, Y., Liu, X., Pan, J., 2012. Pyrosequencing reveals the
497
dominance of methylotrophic methanogenesis in a coal bed methane reservoir associated with Eastern
498
Ordos Basin in China. International journal of coal geology 93, 56-61.
499
Hamilton, S., Go lding, S., Baublys, K., Esterle, J., 2014. Stable isotopic and molecular co mposition of
500
desorbed coal seam gases from the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Australia. International
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
479
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Journal of Coal Geology 122, 21-36.
502
Harris, S.H., Smith, R.L., Barker, C.E., 2008. Microbial and chemical factors influencing methane
503
production in laboratory incubations of low-rank subsurface coals. International Journal of Coal Geology
504
76, 46-51.
505
Hosseini, S.E., Wahid, M.A., 2013. Feasibility study of biogas production and utilization as a source of
506
renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable En ergy Reviews 19, 454-462.
507
Iram, A., Akhtar, K., Ghauri, M.A., 2017. Coal methanogenesis: a review of the need of co mplex
508
microbial consortia and culture conditions for the effective bioconversion of coal into methane. Annals
509
of Microbiology 67, 275-286.
510
Jones, E.J., Voytek, M.A., Co ru m, M .D., Orem, W.H., 2010. Stimu lation of methane generation fro m
511
nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium. Applied and Environ mental
512
Microbiology 76, 7013-7022.
513
Kakei, K., Ozeki, S., Su zuki, T., Kaneko, K., 1990. Multi-stage micropore filling mechanism o f nitrogen
514
on microporous and micrographitic carbons. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 86,
515
371-376.
516
Kirk, M.F., Wilson, B.H., Marquart, K.A., Zeglin, L.H., Vinson, D.S., Flynn, T.M ., 2015. So lute
517
concentrations influence microbial methanogenesis in coal-bearing strata of the Cherokee basin, USA.
518
Frontiers in microbiology 6, 1287.
519
Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L., Littke, R., 2012. BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in
520
early mature Posidonia Shale fro m the Hils area, Germany. International Journal of Coal Geo logy 103,
521
12-25.
522
Lane, D., 16S/ 23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Ed ited by:
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
501
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. 1991. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
524
Lee, S.Y., Park, J.H., Jang, S.H., Nielsen, L.K., Kim, J., Jung, K.S., 2008. Fermentative butanol
525
production by Clostridia. Biotechnology and bioengineering 101, 209-228.
526
Li, D., Hendry, P., Faiz, M., 2008. A survey of the microbial populatio ns in some Australian coalbed
527
methane reservoirs. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 14-24.
528
Mayumi, D., Mochimaru, H., Tamaki, H., Yamamoto, K., Yoshioka, H., Su zuki, Y., Kamagata, Y., Sakata,
529
S., 2016. Methane production from coal by a single methanogen. Science 354, 222-225.
530
McIntosh, J., Mart ini, A., Petsch, S., Huang, R., Nüsslein, K., 2008. Biogeochemistry of the Forest City
531
Basin coalbed methane play. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 111-118.
532
Meslé, M., Dro mart, G., Oger, P., 2013. M icrobial methanogenesis in subsurface oil and coal. Research
533
in microbiology 164, 959-972.
534
Midgley, D.J., Hendry, P., Pinetown, K.L., Fuentes, D., Gong, S., M itchell, D.L., Faiz, M ., 2010.
535
Characterisation of a microbial community associated with a deep, coa l seam methane reservoir in the
536
Gippsland Basin, Australia. International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 232-239.
537
Moore, T.A., 2012. Coalbed methane: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101, 36-81.
538
Nie, B., Liu, X., Yang, L., Meng, J., Li, X., 2015. Pore structure characterizat ion of d ifferent rank coals
539
using gas adsorption and scanning electron microscopy. Fuel 158, 908-917.
540
Papendick, S.L., Downs, K.R., Vo, K.D., Hamilton, S.K., Dawson, G.K., Gold ing, S.D., Gilcrease, P.C.,
541
2011. Biogenic methane potential for Surat Basin, Queensland coal seams. International Journal o f Coal
542
Geology 88, 123-134.
543
Penger, J., Conrad, R., Blaser, M., 2012. Stable carbon isotope fractionation by methylotrophic
544
methanogenic archaea. Applied and environmental microbiology, AEM. 01773-01712.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
523
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Penner, T.J., Foght, J.M., Budwill, K., 2010. Microbial diversity of western Canadian subsurface coal
546
beds and methanogenic coal enrichment cultures. International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 81-93.
547
Prabhu, Y., Phale, P., 2003. Biodegradation of phenanthrene by Pseudomonas sp. strain PP2: novel
548
metabolic pathway, ro le of biosurfactant and cell surface hydrophobicity in hydrocarbon assimilation.
549
Applied microbiology and biotechnology 61, 342-351.
550
Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., Glöckner, F.O., 2013.
551
The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web -based tools.
552
Nucleic acids research 41, D590-D596.
553
Rathi, R., Priya, A., Vohra, M., Lavania, M., Lal, B., Sarma, P.M., 2015. Develop ment of a microbial
554
process for methane generation fro m bitu minous coal at thermophilic conditions. International Journal of
555
Coal Geology 147-148, 25-34.
556
Rightmire, C.T., Eddy, G.E., Kirr, J.N., 1984. Coalbed methane resources of the United States. American
557
Association of Petroleum Geologists.
558
Robbins, S.J., Evans, P.N., Esterle, J.S., Go lding, S.D., Tyson, G.W., 2016. The effect of coal rank on
559
biogenic methane potential and microbial co mposition. International Journal of Coal Geo logy 154,
560
205-212.
561
Ross, D.E., Gu lliver, D., 2016. Reconstruction of a nearly complete Pseudomonas draft genome
562
sequence from a coalbed methane-produced water metagenome. Genome announcements 4,
563
e01024-01016.
564
Shimizu, S., A kiyama, M., Naganuma, T., Fujioka, M., Nako, M ., Ishijima, Y., 2007. Molecu lar
565
characterizat ion of microbial co mmun ities in deep coal seam groundwater of northern Japan. Geobiology
566
5, 423-433.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
545
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Shinoda, Y., Sakai, Y., Uenishi, H., Uchihashi, Y., Hiraishi, A., Yu kawa, H., Yurimoto, H., Kato, N., 2004.
568
Aerobic and anaerobic toluene degradation by a newly isolated denitrifying bacteriu m, Thauera sp. strain
569
DNT-1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 1385-1392.
570
Singh, D.N., Ku mar, A., Sarbhai, M .P., Tripathi, A.K., 2012. Cult ivation -independent analysis of
571
archaeal and bacterial co mmunit ies of the format ion water in an Indian coal bed to enhance
572
biotransformation of coal into methane. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 93, 1337-1350.
573
Stephen, A., Adebusuyi, A., Baldygin, A., Shuster, J., Southam, G., Budwill, K., Foght, J., Nobes, D.S.,
574
Mitra, S.K., 2014. Bioconversion of coal: new insights from a core flooding study. RSC Advances 4,
575
22779-22791.
576
Sträuber, H., Schröder, M., Kleinsteuber, S., 2012. Metabolic and microbial co mmunity dy namics during
577
the hydrolytic and acidogenic fermentation in a leach-bed process. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2,
578
1.
579
Strąpoć, D., Mastalerz, M ., Dawson, K., Macalady, J., Callaghan, A.V., Wawrik, B., Turich, C., Ashby,
580
M., 2011. Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane.
581
Strąpoć, D., Picardal, F.W., Turich, C., Schaperdoth, I., Macalady, J.L., Lipp, J.S., Lin, Y.-S., Ertefai, T.F.,
582
Schubotz, F., Hinrichs, K.-U., 2008. Methane-producing microbial co mmunity in a coal bed of the
583
Illinois Basin. Applied and environmental microbiology 74, 2424-2432.
584
Susilawat i, R., Evans, P.N., Esterle, J.S., Robbins, S.J., Tyson, G.W., Go lding, S.D., Mares, T.E., 2015.
585
Temporal changes in microbial co mmunity co mposition during culture enrich ment experiments with
586
Indonesian coals. International Journal of Coal Geology 137, 66-76.
587
Susilawat i, R., Papendick, S.L., Gilcrease, P.C., Esterle, J.S., Go lding, S.D., Mares, T.E., 2013.
588
Preliminary investigation of biogenic gas production in Indonesian low rank coals and implicatio ns for a
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
567
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
renewable energy source. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 77, 234-242.
590
Tang, Y.-Q., Ji, P., Lai, G.-L., Chi, C.-Q., Liu, Z.-S., Wu, X.-L., 2012. Diverse microbial co mmunity fro m
591
the coalbeds of the Ordos Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology 90, 21-33.
592
Vick, S.H., Greenfield, P., Tran-Dinh, N., Tetu, S.G., M idgley, D.J., Paulsen, I.T., 2018. The Coal Seam
593
Microbio me (CSM B) reference set, a lingua franca for the microbial coal -to-methane community.
594
International Journal of Coal Geology 186, 41-50.
595
Vick, S.H., Tetu, S.G., Sherwood, N., Pinetown, K., Sestak, S., Vallotton, P., Elbourne, L.D., Greenfield,
596
P., Johnson, E., Barton, D., 2016. Revealing colonisation and biofilm format ion of an adherent coal seam
597
associated microbial community on a coal surface. International Journal of Coal Geology 160, 42-50.
598
Webb, P.A., Orr, C., 1997. Analytical methods in fine particle technology. Micro meritics Instrument
599
Corp.
600
Wei, M., Yu, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., 2014. M icrobial d iversity and biogenic meth ane potential of a
601
thermogenic-gas coal mine. International Journal of Coal Geology 134, 96-107.
602
Wrighton, K.C., Tho mas, B.C., Sharon, I., M iller, C.S., Castelle, C.J., VerBerkmoes, N.C., Wilkins, M.J.,
603
Hettich, R.L., Lipton, M.S., Williams, K.H., 2012. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in
604
multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661-1665.
605
Xiong, J., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Zeng, J., Hou, J., Yang, Y., Yao, T., Knight, R., Chu, H., 2012.
606
Geographic distance and pH drive bacteria l distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau.
607
Environmental microbiology 14, 2457-2466.
608
Yang, X., Chen, Y., Wu, R., Nie, Z., Han, Z., Tan, K., Chen, L., 2018. Potential of biogenic methane for
609
pilot-scale fermentation ex situ with lu mp anthracite and the changes of methanogenic consortia. Journal
610
of industrial microbiology & biotechnology 45, 229-237.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
589
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Yousaf, S., Afzal, M., Reichenauer, T.G., Brady, C.L., Sessitsch, A., 2011. Hydrocarbon degradation,
612
plant colonization and gene expression of alkane degradation genes by endophytic Enterobacter ludwigii
613
strains. Environmental pollution 159, 2675-2683.
614
Zhang, J., Liang, Y., Harpalani, S., 2016a. Optimization of methane production from b ituminous coal
615
through biogasification. Applied energy 183, 31-42.
616
Zhang, J., Park, S.Y., Liang, Y., Harpalan i, S., 2016b. Finding cost -effective nutrient solutions and
617
evaluating environmental conditions for biogasifying bituminous coal to methane ex situ. Applied
618
Energy 165, 559-568.
619
Zhang, R., Liu, S., Bahadur, J., Elsworth, D., Wang, Y., Hu, G., Liang, Y., 2017. Changes in pore
620
structure of coal caused by coal-to-gas bioconversion. Scientific reports 7, 3840.
621
Zheng, H., Chen, T., Rudolph, V., Go lding, S.D., 2017. Biogenic methane production from Bowen Basin
622
coal waste materials. International Journal of Coal Geology 169, 22-27.
623
Zheng, L., Liu, G., Qi, C., Zhang, Y., Wong, M., 2008. The use of sequential ext raction to determine the
624
distribution and modes of occurrence of mercury in Permian Huaibei coal, Anhui Province, China.
625
International Journal of Coal Geology 73, 139-155.
626
Zhou, H., Yang, Q., Cheng, Y., Ge, C., Chen, J., 2014. Methane drainage and utilization in coal mines
627
with strong coal and gas outburst dangers: a case study in Luling mine, Ch ina. Journal of Natural Gas
628
Science and Engineering 20, 357-365.
629 630
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
611
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights
632
Methane production was divided into lag, log, peak, and stationary phases.
633
Significant changes in bacterial communities were observed during the log phases.
634
Clostridiales increased obviously during the lag phase, but decreased thereafter.
635
Final coal samples showed changed chemical contents and increased microporosity.
AC C
EP T
ED
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
631
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8