Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion

Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion

Accepted Manuscript Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion Bobo ...

6MB Sizes 0 Downloads 60 Views

Accepted Manuscript Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion

Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu, Yiming Zhang, Hongxun Zhang PII: DOI: Reference:

S0166-5162(18)30619-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.12.004 COGEL 3133

To appear in:

International Journal of Coal Geology

Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:

6 July 2018 7 December 2018 10 December 2018

Please cite this article as: Bobo Wang, Zhisheng Yu, Yiming Zhang, Hongxun Zhang , Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion. Cogel (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.coal.2018.12.004

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1

Microbial communities from the Huaibei Coalfield alter the

2

physicochemical properties of coal in methanogenic bioconversion

3

Bobo Wanga, Zhisheng Yua,b,* [email protected], Yiming Zhangc, Hongxun Zhanga

4

a

5

Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, P.R. China

6

b

7

Road, Beijing 100085, P. R. China

8

c

RI

NU

MA

Environmental Protection Bureau of Shunyi District, Beijing 101300, China

15

AC C

12

14

ED

Corresponding Author.

EP T

*

11

13

SC

Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 18 Shuangqing

9

10

PT

College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 A

16 17

Abstract

18

The relationships among the production of methane, the physicochemical properties of coal, and

19

the composition of microbial communities are poorly understood in methanogenic bioconversion.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

In this study, we investigated the changes in microbial communities during the methanogenic

21

process of coal based on culture-dependent methods as well as the physicochemical properties of

22

the coal samples. The process of methane production could be clearly divided into four phases (lag,

23

log, peak, and stationary phases). The initial bacterial communities in the cultivation were

24

predominantly Bacteroidales, Actionmycetales, and Bacillales; the archaeal community was

25

present at values below the detection limit. However, distinct changes in bacterial communities

26

were noted at the log phase of methane production. Bacteroides species accounted for more than

27

80% of the total bacterial community, and acetotrophic Methanosarcina was the only archaeal

28

community. Interestingly, Clostridiales increased considerably during the first 2 weeks, but

29

decreased thereafter, indicating that Clostridiales may play a unique role during the initial stage of

30

methanogenic coal bioconversion. Furthermore, the final coal sample showed decreased C and O

31

contents and increased N and H contents. Volatile and ash contents as well as microporosity were

32

also higher than those in the initial state. These results suggested that methanogenic coal

33

bioconversion was a complex biochemical process and that the physicochemical properties of coal

34

were altered in methanogenic bioconversion. Moreover, these findings may facilitate the

35

development of strategies to improve the production of biomethane utilizing coal.

36

Keywords: coal; biomethane; microbial community structure; bioconversion; methanogenesis

38 39 40 41

RI

SC

NU

MA

ED

EP T

AC C

37

PT

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

42

1. Introduction

44

Coalbed methane (CBM) has become an important non-conventional energy resource worldwide

45

(Moore, 2012; Strąpoć et al., 2011). Two mechanisms for the production of CBM have been

46

identified, i.e., thermogenic and biogenic processes (Rightmire et al., 1984). Due to its underlying

47

environmental and industrial advantages relative to physical and chemical methods of coal

48

transformations (Fallgren et al., 2013; Hosseini and Wahid, 2013), coal bioconversion to methane

49

may have broad applications in the clean energy field.

NU

SC

RI

PT

43

Methane in coal seams is generated in subsurface and deep coal basins by thermogenic,

51

geological, or microbial breakdown of complicated coal high molecular polymers (biogenesis)

52

(Fakoussa and Hofrichter, 1999; Harris et al., 2008). Many reports have confirmed the biogenic

53

origins of CBM in some CBM reservoirs through isotope analysis and suggested that real-time

54

methane production occurs in in-situ coal seams (Butland and Moore, 2008; Golding et al., 2013;

55

Hamilton et al., 2014; Susilawati et al., 2013). To this end, CBM researchers have focused on how

56

to stimulate methane production in situ by promoting the activity of native microbial communities

57

to degrade coal. These real-time methane bioreactors have been evaluated in several coal bas ins

58

worldwide, such as the Powder River coal basin, Qinshui coal basin, Illinois basin, and Surat basin

59

(Green et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2012; Papendick et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016b). In addition, a

60

number of studies using culture-independent and -dependent methods have revealed that the

61

presence of extensive microbial populations can generate methane from coal in the laboratory

62

(Guo et al., 2012; McIntosh et al., 2008; Penner et al., 2010; Rathi et al., 2015; Robbins et al.,

63

2016; Zhang et al., 2016a). These studies have verified that clean bioenergy methane can be

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

50

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

64

obtained via coal bioconversion. Methanogenic coal bioconversion is the consequence of coal and microbial community

66

interactions. A detailed analysis of the dynamics of microbial community composition is necessary

67

to determine the complicated synergistic or antagonistic effects of these processes in communities

68

and to improve the efficiency and stability of biomethane production. Despite improvements in

69

our understanding of the characteristics of microbial communities, we still have a very limited

70

understanding of the dynamic changes of microbial communities responsible for this process

71

(Susilawati et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018) and little is known about changes in the

72

physicochemical properties of coal during methanogenic coal bioconversion by the indigenous

73

methanogenic consortia.

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

65

A putative metabolic pathway involved in bioconversion of coal to methane has been

75

proposed by Strapoc et al. based on their studies and previous work in other laboratories (Jones et

76

al., 2010; Strąpoć et al., 2011). They suggested that coal degradation to methane begins with

77

hydrolysis of aromatic, polyaromatic and other hydrocarbon substrates into alcohols, volatile fatty

78

acids, and other organic acids. These organic acids are further degraded into methanogenic

79

substrates, such as methanol, H2 /CO2 , and acetate. Bacterial species from Clostridium, Pelobacter,

80

Bacteroides and Spirochaetes were often detected in the coal seam environment and associated

81

production waters, which are involved in fermentation, sulfur metabolism, hydrogen, and

82

hydrocarbons hydrolysis (Aklujkar et al., 2012; Sträuber et al., 2012; Wrighton et al., 2012).

83

Methanogenic communities are composed of three types of functional metabolic consortia,

84

including fermenting, syntrophic and methanogenic species (Iram et al., 2017). The most common

85

substrates for methanogenic species in biomethane production are hydrogen/carbon dioxide,

AC C

EP T

ED

74

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

acetate, and C1 compounds. In terms of these different types of substrates, methanogenic species

87

can be classified as hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic, and methylotrophic (Meslé et al., 2013; Penger

88

et al., 2012). In addition, exceptions to these common substrates are different methoxylated

89

aromatic compounds, which are substrates for Methermicoccus sp. (Mayumi et al., 2016). These

90

various types of methanogenesis suggest that different methanogenic communities induce distinct

91

and extensive methanogenic processes.

RI

PT

86

In this study, we established an anaerobic bioreactor to perform methanogenic coal

93

bioconversion and monitor methane production, and we used this reactor to assess changes in

94

bacterial and archaeal community compositions during different phases of methane production.

95

In addition, we examined changes in the physicochemical properties of coal. These results

96

provide important insights into the optimization of strategies to improve the production of

97

biomethane utilizing coal.

98

2. Materials and Methods

99

2.1 Sampling site

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

92

The Huaibei Coalfield is a primary coal field located in Anhui province, China (Fig. 1).

101

Annual production of coal is over 30 million tons. Most coal is used for industrial fuel and by

102

power plants (Zheng et al., 2008).The Luling coal mine is located in Huaibei Coalfield with three

103

main work seams (seams 8-10). The CBM of Luling coal mine is mixed with secondary biogenic

104

gas, and the no. 8 seam has high abundant reserves of coal and methane (Zhou et al., 2014). Thus,

105

this seam was the target for analysis of methanogenic coal bioconversion in this study. The

106

estimated proportion of thermogenic gas is ranged from 48.54% to 52.15% in the no. 8 coal seam

107

of the Luling coal mine, whereas that of biogenic gas ranged from 47.85% to 51.46% (Bao et al.,

AC C

100

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2014).

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

108

109

ED

111

Fig. 1. Location of the Huaibei coal mine used for sample collection.

2.2 Sample collection and preparation

EP T

110

The collected coal samples were obtained from the inside of newly exposed mining faces to

113

minimize the oxygenation degree of coal samples. Fresh coal samples were placed in sterilized

114

glass bottles and stored at 4 °C in an anaerobic chamber before culture. In the laboratory, the coal

115

was ground to coal powder using a mortar and pestle and sieved through a 200-mesh sieve to

116

collect fractions containing particles less than 250 μm in diameter in an anaerobic chamber

117

(XinmiaoYQX-11; Shanghai, China). The coal powder was separated into two parts, which were

118

used for analysis of physicochemical properties and for bioconversion. The coal powder was used

119

as the sole energy and carbon substrate. Analysis of the physicochemical properties of the coal

120

sample was performed by the Test Center of the China Coal Research Institute in Beijing. A

AC C

112

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

continuous drainage system was used to drain formation water from the underground mine. The

122

formation water sample used as the inoculum was collected in sterilized polyethylene bottles

123

anaerobically. The autoclaved bottles were sealed tightly with butyl rubber stoppers and flushed

124

with nitrogen gas as reported previously (Susilawati et al., 2015). In the laboratory, the formation

125

water sample (3 L) was filtered through sterile 0.22 μm pore-size hydrophobic membrane filters

126

(Whatman Japan KK, Japan). Membranes containing the filtered microbes from formation water

127

were used for subsequent culture with coal.

128

2.3 Detection of methanogenic coal bioconversion

SC

RI

PT

121

To assess changes in microbial communities during the methanogenic coal bioconversion

130

process, microorganisms from formation water were used as the inoculum, and crushed coal

131

powders were used as the carbon substrate. The basal anaerobic medium contained the following

132

(in g/L): MgSO4 ·7H2O (3.45), KCl (0.335), NH4 Cl (0.25), NaCl (11.0), MgCl2 ·2H2O (2.75),

133

K2 HPO4 (0.14), and CaCl2 ·2H2 O (0.14). In addition, the medium contained 40 ml of 1.25% Na2 S

134

-1.25% cysteine, 1 ml of 0.2% Fe(NH4 )2 (SO4)2, 10 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5), and 10 ml/L each

135

of vitamin solutions and trace metals. The vitamin solution contained the following (in mg/L):

136

pyroxidine HCl (10), folic acid (2), biotin (2), riboflavin (5),thiamine HCl (5), lipobenzoic acid (5),

137

vitamin B12 (0.1), nicotinic acid (5), and lipoic acid (5).The trace mineral solution contained the

138

following (in mg/L): MnCl2 ·4H2 O (100), ZnCl2 (70), FeCl2 ·4H2 O (1,500), H3 BO3 (36),CuCl2 (2),

139

NiCl2 ·6H2 O (24), NaMoO4 (6), CoCl2 ·6H2 O (190), AlK(SO4 )2 (10), and 10 ml/L of 25% HCl.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

129

140

Cultures were prepared in 1-L serum bottles (Shuniu Glass), in which 10 g coal powder

141

substrate was combined with 350 mL autoclaved basal medium. The bottles were capped with

142

butyl rubber stoppers, and the filtered membrane of the formation water as the inoculant was

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

transferred into the autoclaved serum bottles (Fig. 2). Culture bottles without coal powders were

144

used as negative controls (no-coal controls). The headspace of the serum bottles was removed

145

using a vacuum and then flushed with pure N2 three times to remove O2 . Cultures were incubated

146

without shaking at 35°C. The rubber hose, stop valve, and syringe were assembled and crossed

147

through the butyl rubber stopper to collect 2 mL culture solution every week until methane

148

production reached the stationary phase, at which total methane content no longer increased.

149

Before collection, cultures in the bottles were shaken at 100 rpm for 1 h using a magnetic stirring

150

device to mix the culture solution. The collected cultures were stored at -80°C until used for DNA

151

extraction. Cultivations were performed in triplicate. Methane content in the gas collecting bag of

152

the bioreactor was detected weekly using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890A; Agilent

153

Technologies, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector.

154

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

143

155

Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of bioconversion and extraction process. 1: serum bottle, 2: coal, 3: culture solution and

156

microflora, 4: rubber plug of the serum bottle, 5: stainless steel conduit, 6: screw cap of serum bottle, 7: aluminum

157

foil gas collecting bag, 8: syinger, 9: rubber hose, 10: circulator bath, 11: magnetic stirring device, 12: stop valve,

158

13: gas chromatography, 14: high-throughput sequencing.

159

2.4 Microbial community analysis

160

2.4.1 DNA extraction and amplification

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The archaea and bacteria in the cultures samples were identified using an Illumina

162

HiSeq2500. Collected culture samples were a mixture of three cultures from three independent

163

experiments. Genomic DNA from the collected cultures supplemented with 0.2% Tween 80 was

164

extracted using a FastDNA SPIN kit (Bio101 Systems, USA) according to the manufacturer ’s

165

instructions (Guo et al., 2012). The 16S rRNA genes of archaea and bacteria were used for

166

microbial community analysis. The universal bacterial primer set BAC-515F/907R (Xiong et al.,

167

2012) and archaeal primer set AR-519F/915R (Lane) were used for amplification of 16S rRNA

168

genes of bacteria and archaea, respectively.

169

2.4.2 Library construction and sequencing

NU

SC

RI

PT

161

Purified PCR products were used to construct the DNA library with a TruSeq® DNA

171

PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit according to the manufacturer ’s instructions. Constructed DNA

172

libraries were checked using Qubit and qPCR and then sequenced on a HiSeq2500 PE250

173

platform.

174

2.4.3 Phylogenetic analysis of sequencing data

EP T

ED

MA

170

Chimeric sequences were processed by quality control with Qiime (V1.7.0) (Caporaso et al.,

176

2010). The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were defined with Uparse software (v7.0.1001,

177

http://drive5.com/uparse/) at a 97% cut-off (Edgar, 2013). The representative sequences for each

178

OTU were compared with the SSUrRNA sequence database (Quast et al., 2013). The obtained

179

bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the NCBI short read archive

180

(SRA) database with Bioproject accession number PRJNA474893.

181

2.5 Low-pressure N2 gas adsorption (LPGA) isotherms and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

182

AC C

175

LPGA experiments were performed on a QuantachromeAutosorb-6B/3B apparatus to

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

evaluate the microporosity of coal samples before and after bioconversion. The coal samples

184

(weighing 2 g) for adsorption analysis were outgassed at 120°C for 12 h under high vacuum to

185

remove air and free water. N2 adsorption isotherms of samples kept in liquid nitrogen (77.35 K at

186

101.3 kPa) were obtained for analysis of relative pressure (P/P 0 ; the gas pressure/the saturated

187

vapor pressure) ranging from 0.01 to 0.995. Based on multiple adsorption theories, such as

188

Langmuir, Barrett_Joyner_Halenda, Brunauer_Emmett_Teller, Dubinin_Radushkevich, density

189

functional theory and Dubinin_Astakhov (Clarkson and Bustin, 1999; Webb and Orr, 1997), pore

190

structure parameters were calculated by the computer software. A specific description of these

191

techniques and theories was documented by Kakei et al. (Kakei et al., 1990).

NU

SC

RI

PT

183

In order to characterize the porosity of coal samples, developed scanning electron microscopy

193

(SEM) methodology was adopted (Klaver et al., 2012). Coal samples collected before and after

194

bioconversion were observed by field emission-SEM (Quanta 200F). SEM observations were

195

conducted at the Electron Microscopy Laboratory of Peking University.

196

2.5 Statistical analysis

EP T

ED

MA

192

Statistical tests based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the method of least significant

198

differences at the 5% level were used to determine significant differences in the chemical

199

composition of coal before and after bioconversion. All statistical analyses were performed with

200

SPSS 17.0.

201

3. Results

202

3.1 Methane production

AC C

197

203

Significantly greater methane content (p < 0.001) was produced from continuous cultivations

204

of coal powder cultured with inoculum filtered from formation water (test group, 63.8 μmol CH4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT g−1 coal; Fig. 3) compared with that from no coal controls (0.2 μmol CH4 g−1 coal; data not

206

shown). For the entire culturing process, methane production could be clearly divided into four

207

phases (lag phase, log phase, peak phase, and stationary phase; Fig. 3) in the test group.

208

Specifically, methane production increased slowly until week 3. After week 3, methane production

209

increased dramatically and continued until week 5. After week 5, methane production began to

210

decrease and was stopped at week 8 when no increased methane production was detected in all

211

repeated experimental controls (Fig. 3).

212

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

205

Fig. 3. Plots of average methane production from coal bio conversion during the 9-week cultivation using coal and

214

inoculum filtered from production water. Error bars represent standard deviation for replicates tubes.

215

3.2 Changes in the coal physicochemical properties of coal

AC C

213

216

When the methane yield no longer increased in methanogenic coal bioconversion, we found

217

that abundant amounts of coal substrate remained in the bioreactor. Thus, we then examined

218

changes in the physicochemical properties of coal after methanogenic coal biotransformation. As

219

shown in Table 1, ultimate analysis revealed that coal sample from the Luling coal mine is

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

characterised by high proportions of carbon, and low proportions of hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur,

221

and oxygen. The volatile matter and ash yields were quite high, up to 30.25% and 14.67%. The

222

coal macerals were composed of liptinite, inertinite, vitrinite, and mineral matter. Inertinite and

223

vitrinite contents in coal samples were quite high, whereas the liptinite contents and mineral

224

matter were relatively low. In addition, coal samples from the no. 8 coal seam had a reflectance

225

(Ro, max) of 0.82% ± 0.05%. According to the Chinese classification (GB5751-86) (Chen, 2000),

226

coal samples from the Luling coal mine in this study w ere classified as bituminous. The coal

227

sample after bioconversion had higher volatile matter and ash, contents and hydrogen, and

228

nitrogen contents than the origin coal sample, whereas the carbon, oxygen, and fixed carbon

229

contents were decreased. The significance of the change of each chemical component was also

230

confirmed by the ANOVA (Table 1). The p value for each chemical components of coal was lower

231

than 0.05 except sulfur, which implied that all of the tested chemical components, except sulfur,

232

underwent significant changes after bioconversion. All ANOVA analysis results are available in

233

supplementary material file (Table S1).

234

Table 1. ANOVA analysis for chemical components of coals coal samples before and after bioconversion.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

220

Yield (%)a

Analysis

BEFORE

SSb

df

M Sb

F value

p value

AFTER

Proximate analyses (dry) % M oisture

14.67±0.02

16.04±0.05

2.84

1

2.84

1688.64

2.10*10-6

30.25±0.03

32.58±0.06

8.13

1

8.13

59675.86

1.68*10-9

55.08±0.06

51.38±0.07

20.52

1

20.52

14625.32

2.80*10-9

Ash Volatile matter Fixed carbon

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Ultimate analysis vol. (dry ash free)%

81.74±0.

Carbon

79.13±0.09

10.25

1

10.25

4664.85

2.75*10-7

13 4.46±0.02

6.95±0.05

9.29

1

9.28

10685.16

5.25*10-8

Nitrogen

1.48±0.03

2.96±0.02

3.27

1

3.27

7736.12

1.00*10-7

Sulfur

0.12±0.02

0.15±0.02

0.001

1

0.001

5.57

0.0776

Oxygen

12.19±0.04

10.81±0.05

2.83

1

2.83

1846.12

1.75*10-6

PT

Hydrogen

51.7

--

Liptinite

44.3

--

Inertinite

1.6

--

2.4

--

0.82±0.05

--

SC

Vitrinite

RI

Petrographic analysis vol.%

matter Reflectance

NU

M ineral

(Ro, max)% bituminous

MA

Classfication a

Each value shown represents the mean±(SD) of three individual experiments.

236

b

SS, between-groups sum of squares. M S, between-groups mean squares.

ED

235

Low-pressure N2 gas adsorption/desorption analysis was used to evaluate the microporosity

238

of coal in this study. The LPGA isotherms for coal samples before and after bioconversion are

239

shown in Fig. 4. The remaining coal substrate exhibited higher adsorption, adsorbing most N2 (> 4

240

cm3 /g) at the highest pressure (Fig. 4b), whereas the original coal sample absorbed little N2 (< 1

241

cm3 /g), indicating minor microporosity. These results demonstrated that there were significant

242

differences in coal microporosity before and after bioconversion.

AC C

EP T

237

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(b)

PT

(a)

Fig. 4. LP-N 2GA isotherms for coal samples before (a) and after bioconversion (b).

SC

244

RI

243

Furthermore, SEM was then performed to supplement the results of LPGA isotherms analysis.

246

The combination of SEM observations and LPGA could provide clearer insights into the

247

microporosity and pore shape of coal (Nie et al., 2015). The surface images of the coal samples

248

before and after bioconversion were enlarged 12,000 times; representative images are shown in

249

Fig. 5. The remaining coal substrate samples showed a highly porous structure with numerous

250

typical slit-shaped pores compared with the original coal samples. Few open pores were observed

251

in the original coal samples (Fig. 5a), supporting the smaller hysteresis loops in Fig. 4a. The

252

increased numbers of slit-shaped pores supported the increased microporosity of coal after

253

bioconversion. The results of SEM observation were quite consistent with the LPGA isotherm

254

analysis.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

245

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (a)

5.0 μm

5.0 μm

PT

5.0 μm

SC

RI

(b)

5.0 μm

NU

5.0 μm

255

5.0 μm

Fig. 5. Representative SEM images of coal samples before (a) and after (b) bioconversion. The slit-shaped pores are

257

indicated by white arrows. The scanning electron microscope was operating at 10 kV.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

256

258 259

Fig. 6 SEM image of microbial attachment to the coal after bioconversion. The rod shaped and spherical cells are

260

indicated by red and yellow arrows, respectively. The scanning electron microscope was operating at 10 kV.

261

In addition, SEM observations also intuitively showed that a number of microbes adhered to

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

the coal matrix after bioconversion (Fig. 6). The agglomeration and adhes ion of two different

263

cellular morphotypes were apparent in the SEM images, the most abundant being 2-4 μm rod

264

shaped cells. The other morphotype was spherical cells measuring approximately 1 μm. These

265

morphotypes were primarily located on or near the cracks of the coal surface.

266

3.3 Dynamic analysis of microbial communities

PT

262

In order to elucidate dynamic changes in microbial communities during methanogenic coal

268

bioconversion, a deep assessment of the microbial communities in the collected culture solution

269

every week in the bioreactor was performed by high-throughput sequencing. In total, 1,197,930

270

(676,697 + 521,433) qualitative sequences were obtained. The average sequence lengths of

271

archaea and bacteria were 371 and 359bp, respectively. Q30 for bacteria and archaea ranged from

272

0.96 to 0.99, suggesting high sequencing accuracy. Additional details on the sequencing data are

273

shown in the supplementary information (Table S2).

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

267

Methanogenic coal bioconversion successfully enriched the bacterial and archaeal

275

communities. The phylogenetic classification of bacteria and archaea and their closest genera from

276

all culture points are listed in Table S3. In total, 56 bacterial species and one archaeal species at

277

the genus level were observed during methanogenic coal bioconversion. The microbial

278

communities responsible for coal bioconversion had high bacterial and low archaeal diversities in

279

the bioreactor. Across all cultures and time points, the bacterial sequences were dominated by

280

members of the genera Propionibacterium, Bacillus, and Desulfurispora genera, whereas other

281

species belonging to the genera Pseudomonas,

282

Paenibacillus, and Shewanella were consistently present at low levels (Table S2). For archaeal

283

communities, acetoclastic methanogens from the genera of Methanosarcina were dominant in all

AC C

EP T

274

Paludibacter, Desulfovibrio,

Geovibrio,

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

284

cultures (Fig. 7). The dynamics of microbial communities were analysed in terms of methane production phase

286

during the 9-week cultivation. After the first week of cultivation, Actinomycetales, Bacteroidales,

287

and Bacillales were the most abundant orders, accounting for 55.93%, 14.37%, and 24.14% of

288

total bacteria (Fig. 7a), respectively. After the second week, Actinomycetales, Bacteroidales,

289

Bacillales, and Clostridiales were the most abundant orders, accounting for 49.19%, 14.3%, 9.7%

290

and 25.25% of the total bacteria, respectively. The relative abundance of the total bacteria in the

291

third week was quite different from that in the first and second weeks at the order level. Although

292

the relative abundance of Actinomycetales, Bacillales and Clostridiales accounted for large

293

proportions of the total bacteria, these orders were far more less than that in the second week (Fig.

294

7a). The most abundant order was Bacteroidales, accounting for 77.31% of the total bacteria. After

295

week 3, the relative abundances of the bacteria changed only slightly. Bacteroidales was dominant

296

from week 4 to week 9, whereas orders Actinomycetales and Clostridiales were the main

297

components during these weeks (Fig. 7a). The archaeal community abundance at the genus level is

298

shown in Fig. 7b. During weeks 1 and 2, the archaeal community was below the limit of detection.

299

Subsequently, the acetotrophic Methanosarcina from the order Methanosarcinale was dominant in

300

the archaeal community. As culture time increased, the archaeal relative abundance exhibited a

301

nearly steady state from week 3 to week 9. These results indicated that regular changes in the

302

microbial community structure occurred during methanogenic coal bioconversion.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

285

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RI

PT

(a)

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

(b)

303

Fig. 7. Relative abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bioreactor from Illumina HiSeq sequencing for

305

bacteria (a) and archaea (b). Archaea were not detected in the first 2 weeks. The sample name in each line

306

represents the collected culture sample in the bioreactor from week 1 to week 9, respectively.

307

AC C

304

308

4. Discussion

309

Many in situ and laboratory-based studies have demonstrated the occurrence of biogenic methane

310

and the methane-forming potential of coal bioconversion; however, a limited understanding of the

311

microorganisms responsible for this process is documented. This was a comprehensive study

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

detailing changes in the structure of the microbial community and the physicochemical properties

313

of coal during methanogenic coal bioconversion in a bioreactor with continuous cultivation. In this

314

process, simulative bioconversion equipment was combined with a sample extraction device to

315

obtain the extraction via in situ culture to avoid disrupting the anaerobic conditions in the

316

bioreactor, thereby ensuring the continuity of the bioconversion process. Our analyses of

317

microbial communities and changes in physicochemical properties of coal showed that

318

methanogenic coal bioconversion is a complex biochemical process.

SC

RI

PT

312

During the 9-week cultivation using coal and inoculum filtered from production water, the

320

process of methane production passed through four phases. During the first 2 weeks, no methane

321

was detected. However, in a study by Rita Susilawati et al., small amounts methane were detected

322

in the lag phase (Susilawati et al., 2015). They suggested that the methane was released from

323

adsorbed methane in the coal substrate. In this study, the adsorbed methane may have been

324

sweeping off by blowing N2 persistently before the reaction started. Although no biomethane was

325

produced, coal bioavailability could be accelerated during this phase, providing the available

326

substrates for methanogens, consequently resulting in methane production. Following the initial

327

lag phase, a typical log phase was also observed for microbial community growth with coal

328

(Fuertez et al., 2017; Susilawati et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2018). Significant methane accumulation

329

was detected after week 3, and no increases in methane were observed in no coal controls (data

330

not shown). The methane production from the test groups increased over time until week 8.

331

Although the acetoclastic methanogen Methanosarcina was detected during week 9, the methane

332

yield did not increase. Susilawati et al. suggested that the accumulated toxic by-products from

333

microbial metabolism during long-term cultivation may influence the capacity of the

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

319

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

334

methanogenesis community to transform coal to methane (Susilawati et al., 2015). Significant changes in the physicochemical properties of coal were found during

336

methanogenic coal bioconversion. The remaining coal substrate after bioconversion exhibited

337

increased volatile matter and ash contents, higher hydrogen and nitrogen contents, and increased

338

microporosity, whereas the carbon, oxygen, and fixed carbon contents were decreased. Zhang et al.

339

also found that biotreated coal samples had higher volatile contents than untreated coal in a recent

340

study (Zhang et al., 2017). However, they reported that the carbon and oxygen contents of coal

341

were increased after bioconversion. Differences in changes in the chemical components could be

342

due to the different compositions of coal samples. The increases in N and H contents could be

343

attributed to the ammonia of bacterial strains because of the microbial protein interactions with

344

coal. Increased microporosity was detected by LPGA, and coal after bioconversion showed higher

345

N2 absorption than that before bioconversion. Although it is not easy to view the inner core

346

because of its highly compact structure, SEM can be a well-established technique to determine the

347

morphology of the coal surface (Nie et al., 2015). The SEM results further supported the LPGA

348

experiments. Four types of pore shapes in coal can often be founded under SEM observation.

349

Those are cylindrical pores, slit-shaped pores, wedge-shaped pores, and bottle neck pores. Typical

350

slit-shaped pores were observed in the coal after bioconversion. The emerging slit-shaped pores

351

seem to be intrinsic in the coal. Bioconversion will consume a part of the coal matrix, exposing

352

pores from the inner part of the coal and enlarging the sizes of these intrinsic pores, as showed in

353

Fig. 5. Thus, the microbial activity may contribute to the increased slit-shaped pores, which may

354

facilitate the interaction between coal and microbial communities. However, this hypothesis was

355

based on the observed results and how many pores were exposed and to what extend the pore

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

335

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

volume was enlarged remain unclear. Further studies are needed to quantitatively verify this

357

hypothesis to determine changes in the pore structure. In addition, microbial attachment to the coal

358

was observed in the SEM image. Rod shaped and spherical cells were the major microorganisms.

359

This close attachment presumably indicates a mechanism to maintain cellular interactions with the

360

insoluble carbon utilised by these microorganisms for growth and energy. Similarly, Guo et al.

361

also found spherical bacteria and bacillus to be the dominant microorganisms adhered to the coal

362

surface and suggested a significant positive correlation between microbial adhesion behaviour and

363

coal bioconversion (Guo et al., 2018). Vick et al. found that spherical and rod shaped morphotypes

364

were the most abundant cells attached to the coal disk and that microbial biofilm structure became

365

visible over time (Vick et al., 2016). However, there was no obvious biofilm structure observed on

366

the coal after 9-week culture in this study. This is probably because powdery coal was not

367

conducive to the formation of biofilm.

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

356

The bacterial and archaeal communities were successfully enriched in methanogenic coal

369

bioconversion. Changes in bacterial and archaeal communities were analysed during the different

370

phases. During the lag phase, the predominant bacterial members of the community were

371

Bacteroidales, Actionmycetales, Bacillales, and Clostridiales species. The members of these

372

bacteria can ferment and hydrolyse hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds and have been

373

identified previously in several studies of coal associated enrichment cultures (Midgley et al.,

374

2010; Robbins et al., 2016; Stephen et al., 2014). Thus, these bacteria were likely the primary

375

degraders of coal substrates in the bioreactors. Interestingly, Clostridiales showed an obvious

376

increase during the first 2 weeks and decreased thereafter. This result suggested that Clostridiales

377

may have had a special role during the initial stage of methanogenic coal bioconversion in our

AC C

EP T

368

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

cultures. Several studies have shown that members of Clostridiales contained a family of

379

anaerobic fermentative bacteria, which can degrade aromatic compounds to produce various

380

organic acids (Brenner et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2008). Wei et al. (Wei et al., 2014) also found that

381

Clostridiales served as a dominant fermentative bacteria involved in coal biogasification. Thus, the

382

contribution of this order in this study is probably related to organic matter degradation and to

383

organic acid production for syntrophic bacteria, aceticlastic methanogens, or both in the initial

384

phase of methane production. In the log phase, methane production increased promptly and

385

reached the maximum methane production rate at around week 5 in all cultures. Moreover, based

386

on the results from pyrosequencing, the genus Methanosarcina was detected in the extract samples

387

from week 3 to week 9 and was the predominant component with nearly 100% of the sequence

388

reads. Methanosarcina species are the predominant constituents of the archaeal community,

389

consistent with other finding showing Methanosarcina accounts for a large proportion after

390

enrichment culture with coal (Yang et al., 2018). Methanosarcina is a representative acetotrophic

391

methanogen, and the dominance of Methanosarcina throughout the coal bioconversion process

392

strongly suggested that acetotrophic methanogenesis was the main pathway. From week 4 to week

393

9, the relative abundances of bacteria changed slightly, suggesting that the community structure

394

became more stable during methane production. In addition, Propionibacterium species were

395

always present at high proportions over the culture course in coal containing cultures, suggesting

396

that Propionibacterium species likely metabolized substrates directly from the coal. Strains of

397

Propionibacterium were shown to produce propionic acid and acetic acid efficiently from various

398

substrates in fermentation (Babuchowski et al., 1993). Because the proportions of the acetoclastic

399

Methanosarcina had increased after the lag phase, it was likely that this organism syntrophically

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

378

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

400

consumed the acetate being produced by Propionibacterium, which was involved in acetogens.

401

However, further studies are required to identify the specific mechanisms involved in this process.

402

These results suggested that methanogenesis utilized the hydrolysis and fermentation of end

403

products produced by the bacterial components.

PT l

Surat Basin well 1

l

Sydney Basin Well 1

l

k

Bowen Basin

ED

Lithgow State Coal Mine

EP T

404

Sydney Basin(south)

CSMB_4034

j

Dechloromonas sp.

Ishikari Basin

CSMB_839

RI

Fusibacter sp.

i

CSMB_713

Powder River Basin

Dehalobacter sp.

h

CSMB_561

Illinois Basin

Geovibrio sp.

SC

CSMB_219

g

Thauera sp.

Ordos Basin

CSMB_146

Ordos Basin (east)

Geosporobacter sp.

NU

CSMB_101

f

Methanosarcina sp.

e

CSMB_85

Damodar Basin

Bacillus sp.

d

CSMB_31

Canadian Sedimentary Basin

Propionibacterium sp.

c

CSMB_20

MA

Pseudomonas sp.

Jingmen-Dangyang Basin

CSMB_8

b

Acinetobacter sp.

Co-occurance in published studies

Cherokee Basin

CSMB number

a

Taxonomy

Fig. 8 The abundant OTUs in methanogenic bioconversion from the Huaibei coalfield with their assigned CSM B

406

numbers at a 98% similarity cut-off and their co-occurrences (indicated by red squares) across a range of published

407

studies. a (Beckmann et al., 2018), b(Kirk et al., 2015), c (Wei et al., 2014), d(Penner et al., 2010), e (Singh et al.,

408

2012), f(Guo et al., 2012), g(Tang et al., 2012), h(Strąpoć et al., 2008), I(Green et al., 2008), j (Shimizu et al., 2007),

409

k

AC C

405

(Li et al., 2008), l(Vick et al., 2018).

410

Vick et al. have developed a new and easily accessible Coal Seam Microbiome (CSMB)

411

reference set of OTU sequences from the 16S rRNA gene of coal seam microbial communities

412

provided in many published manuscripts (Vick et al., 2018). By mapping the 16S rRNA gene from

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

the Huaibei coalfield in this study to the CSMB reference set, some of the abundant OTUs

414

identified in methanogenic bioconversion were also found have occurred in other coal basins

415

around the world (Fig. 8). Interestingly, both the dominate OTUs matched in the CSMB reference

416

set were not observed in the Canadian sedimentary basin and Damodar basin. Of the co-observed

417

microbes, the uniquely identified archaea Methanosarcina sp. (CSMB_101) from the Huaibei

418

coalfield were ubiquitous and have been found previously in the majority of coal basin

419

environments. Similarly, the proteobacterial bacteria Pseudomonas sp. (CSMB_20), a commonly

420

observed genus has also been observed in the Surat basin, Sydney basin, Bowen basin, and

421

Ishikari basin. Pseudomonas sp. is known to degrade hydrocarbon, alkane, naphthalene, and

422

polyaromatics (Prabhu and Phale, 2003; Ross and Gulliver, 2016). Members of Acinetobacter sp.

423

(CSMB_8) observed in Surat basin, Sydney basin, Bowen basin and Ordos basin have

424

hydrocarbon degradation capacities (Yousaf et al., 2011). The Rhodocyclales order members

425

Thauera sp. (CSMB_219), observed in Surat basin, Bowen basin, and Sydney basin have been

426

reported to denitrify under anaerobic aromatic compound degradation (Shinoda et al., 2004). The

427

proteobacterial bacteria Dechloromonas sp. (CSMB_4034) only co-occurred in the Sydney basin

428

well 1# across the CSMB reference set is involved in degrading aromatic hydrocarbons

429

anaerobically (Chakraborty et al., 2005; Fry et al., 2009), such as benzene, a likely intermediate of

430

coal depolymerisation (Zheng et al., 2017). However, some dominate OTUs were not mapped to

431

the CSMB reference set. For example, Paludibacter sp. belonging to the Bacteroidales order could

432

not map to any members of the CSMB reference set. This uncommon phenomenon indicated that

433

a subset of microorganisms surviving in the Huaibei coalfield may have limited distributions.

434

5. Conclusion

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

413

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

This study systematically showed that the bacterial community structure changed over time during

436

methanogenic coal bioconversion and that acetotrophic methanogens contributed to the maximum

437

biomethane production. Notably, the microbial communities changed obviously during the log

438

phase. What is more, the coal samples after bioconversion showed decreased C and O contents

439

and increased N and H contents, volatile matter, ash contents, and increased microporosity. These

440

findings suggested there are complicated interactions among the production of methane, the

441

physicochemical properties of coal, and the composition of microbial communities. Further

442

studies are required to improve the performance of the main groups of microorganisms involved in

443

order to increase process stability and enhance biogas production.

444

Acknowledgments

445

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (20877098) and the

446

Strategic Priority Research Program (B) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB15010200).

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

435

EP T

447

References

449

Aklujkar, M ., Haveman, S.A., DiDonato, R., Chertkov, O., Han, C.S., Land, M.L., Bro wn, P., Lovley,

450

D.R., 2012. The genome of Pelobacter carbinolicus reveals surprising metabolic capabilit ies and

451

physiological features. BMC genomics 13, 690.

452

Babuchowski, A., Hammond, E.G., Glatz, B.A., 1993. Survey of propionibacteria for ability to produce

453

propionic and acetic acids. Journal of food protection 56, 493-496.

454

Bao, Y., Wei, C., Wang, C., Wang, G., Li, Q., 2014. Geochemical characteristics and generation process

455

of mixed biogenic and thermogenic coalbed methane in Luling coalfield, China. Energy & Fuels 28,

456

4392-4401.

AC C

448

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Beckmann, S., Luk, A.W., Gutierrez-Zamo ra, M.-L., Chong, N.H.H., Tho mas, T., Lee, M., Manefield,

458

M., 2018. Long-term succession in a coal seam microbio me during in situ biostimulation of

459

coalbed-methane generation. The ISME journal, 1.

460

Brenner, D., Krieg, N.R., Staley, J., 2005. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Second Edition.

461

Vol.(2), The Proteobacteria part B, The Gammaproteobacteria. Springer Science and Business Media,

462

Inc., New York, USA.

463

Butland, C.I., Moore, T.A., 2008. Secondary biogenic coal seam gas reservoirs in New Zealand: a

464

preliminary assessment of gas contents. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 151-165.

465

Caporaso, J.G., Kuczynski, J., Sto mbaugh, J., Bitt inger, K., Bushman, F.D., Costello, E.K., Fierer, N.,

466

Pena, A.G., Goodrich, J.K., Go rdon, J.I., 2010. QIIM E allows analysis of high -throughput community

467

sequencing data. Nature methods 7, 335-336.

468

Chakraborty, R., O'Connor, S.M., Chan, E., Coates, J.D., 2005. Anaerobic degradation of benzene,

469

toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene co mpounds by Dechloromonas strain RCB. Applied & Environ mental

470

Microbiology 71, 8649.

471

Chen, P., 2000. Study on integrated classification system for Chinese coal. Fuel processing technology

472

62, 77-87.

473

Clarkson, C., Bustin, R., 1999. The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties

474

of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions. Fuel 78,

475

1333-1344.

476

Edgar, R.C., 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences fro m microbial amplicon reads. Nature

477

methods 10, 996-998.

478

Fakoussa, R., Hofrichter, M., 1999. Biotechnology and microbiology of coal degradation. Applied

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

457

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Microbiology and Biotechnology 52, 25-40.

480

Fallgren, P.H., Jin, S., Zeng, C., Ren, Z., Lu, A., Colberg, P.J., 2013. Co mparison of coal rank for

481

enhanced biogenic natural gas production. International Journal of Coal Geology 115, 92-96.

482

Fry, J.C., Horsfield, B., Sykes, R., Cragg, B.A., Heywood, C., Kim, G.T., Mangelsdorf, K., M ildenhall,

483

D.C., Rinna, J., Vieth, A., 2009. Prokaryotic populations and activities in an interbedded coal deposit,

484

including a previously deeply buried section (1.6–2.3 km) above∼ 150 Ma basement rock.

485

Geomicrobiology Journal 26, 163-178.

486

Fuertez, J., Nguyen, V., McLennan, J.D., Adams, D.J., Han, K. -B., Sparks, T.D., 2017. Optimization of

487

biogenic methane production from coal. International Journal of Coal Geology 183, 14-24.

488

Go lding, S.D., Boreham, C.J., Esterle, J.S., 2013. Stable isotope geochemistry of coal bed and shale gas

489

and related production waters: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology 120, 24-40.

490

Green, M .S., Flanegan, K.C., Gilcrease, P.C., 2008. Characterization of a methanogenic consortium

491

enriched fro m a coalbed methane well in the Powder River Basin, USA. International Journal of Coal

492

Geology 76, 34-45.

493

Guo, H., Dong, Z., Liu, X., Bai, Y., Gao, Z., Xia, D., 2018. Analysis of methanog ens adsorption and

494

biogas production characteristics from different coal surfaces. Environ mental Science and Po llution

495

Research, 1-8.

496

Guo, H., Liu, R., Yu , Z., Zhang, H., Yun, J., Li, Y., Liu, X., Pan, J., 2012. Pyrosequencing reveals the

497

dominance of methylotrophic methanogenesis in a coal bed methane reservoir associated with Eastern

498

Ordos Basin in China. International journal of coal geology 93, 56-61.

499

Hamilton, S., Go lding, S., Baublys, K., Esterle, J., 2014. Stable isotopic and molecular co mposition of

500

desorbed coal seam gases from the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Australia. International

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

479

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Journal of Coal Geology 122, 21-36.

502

Harris, S.H., Smith, R.L., Barker, C.E., 2008. Microbial and chemical factors influencing methane

503

production in laboratory incubations of low-rank subsurface coals. International Journal of Coal Geology

504

76, 46-51.

505

Hosseini, S.E., Wahid, M.A., 2013. Feasibility study of biogas production and utilization as a source of

506

renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable En ergy Reviews 19, 454-462.

507

Iram, A., Akhtar, K., Ghauri, M.A., 2017. Coal methanogenesis: a review of the need of co mplex

508

microbial consortia and culture conditions for the effective bioconversion of coal into methane. Annals

509

of Microbiology 67, 275-286.

510

Jones, E.J., Voytek, M.A., Co ru m, M .D., Orem, W.H., 2010. Stimu lation of methane generation fro m

511

nonproductive coal by addition of nutrients or a microbial consortium. Applied and Environ mental

512

Microbiology 76, 7013-7022.

513

Kakei, K., Ozeki, S., Su zuki, T., Kaneko, K., 1990. Multi-stage micropore filling mechanism o f nitrogen

514

on microporous and micrographitic carbons. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 86,

515

371-376.

516

Kirk, M.F., Wilson, B.H., Marquart, K.A., Zeglin, L.H., Vinson, D.S., Flynn, T.M ., 2015. So lute

517

concentrations influence microbial methanogenesis in coal-bearing strata of the Cherokee basin, USA.

518

Frontiers in microbiology 6, 1287.

519

Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Urai, J.L., Littke, R., 2012. BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in

520

early mature Posidonia Shale fro m the Hils area, Germany. International Journal of Coal Geo logy 103,

521

12-25.

522

Lane, D., 16S/ 23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Ed ited by:

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

501

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. 1991. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

524

Lee, S.Y., Park, J.H., Jang, S.H., Nielsen, L.K., Kim, J., Jung, K.S., 2008. Fermentative butanol

525

production by Clostridia. Biotechnology and bioengineering 101, 209-228.

526

Li, D., Hendry, P., Faiz, M., 2008. A survey of the microbial populatio ns in some Australian coalbed

527

methane reservoirs. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 14-24.

528

Mayumi, D., Mochimaru, H., Tamaki, H., Yamamoto, K., Yoshioka, H., Su zuki, Y., Kamagata, Y., Sakata,

529

S., 2016. Methane production from coal by a single methanogen. Science 354, 222-225.

530

McIntosh, J., Mart ini, A., Petsch, S., Huang, R., Nüsslein, K., 2008. Biogeochemistry of the Forest City

531

Basin coalbed methane play. International Journal of Coal Geology 76, 111-118.

532

Meslé, M., Dro mart, G., Oger, P., 2013. M icrobial methanogenesis in subsurface oil and coal. Research

533

in microbiology 164, 959-972.

534

Midgley, D.J., Hendry, P., Pinetown, K.L., Fuentes, D., Gong, S., M itchell, D.L., Faiz, M ., 2010.

535

Characterisation of a microbial community associated with a deep, coa l seam methane reservoir in the

536

Gippsland Basin, Australia. International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 232-239.

537

Moore, T.A., 2012. Coalbed methane: a review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101, 36-81.

538

Nie, B., Liu, X., Yang, L., Meng, J., Li, X., 2015. Pore structure characterizat ion of d ifferent rank coals

539

using gas adsorption and scanning electron microscopy. Fuel 158, 908-917.

540

Papendick, S.L., Downs, K.R., Vo, K.D., Hamilton, S.K., Dawson, G.K., Gold ing, S.D., Gilcrease, P.C.,

541

2011. Biogenic methane potential for Surat Basin, Queensland coal seams. International Journal o f Coal

542

Geology 88, 123-134.

543

Penger, J., Conrad, R., Blaser, M., 2012. Stable carbon isotope fractionation by methylotrophic

544

methanogenic archaea. Applied and environmental microbiology, AEM. 01773-01712.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

523

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Penner, T.J., Foght, J.M., Budwill, K., 2010. Microbial diversity of western Canadian subsurface coal

546

beds and methanogenic coal enrichment cultures. International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 81-93.

547

Prabhu, Y., Phale, P., 2003. Biodegradation of phenanthrene by Pseudomonas sp. strain PP2: novel

548

metabolic pathway, ro le of biosurfactant and cell surface hydrophobicity in hydrocarbon assimilation.

549

Applied microbiology and biotechnology 61, 342-351.

550

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., Glöckner, F.O., 2013.

551

The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web -based tools.

552

Nucleic acids research 41, D590-D596.

553

Rathi, R., Priya, A., Vohra, M., Lavania, M., Lal, B., Sarma, P.M., 2015. Develop ment of a microbial

554

process for methane generation fro m bitu minous coal at thermophilic conditions. International Journal of

555

Coal Geology 147-148, 25-34.

556

Rightmire, C.T., Eddy, G.E., Kirr, J.N., 1984. Coalbed methane resources of the United States. American

557

Association of Petroleum Geologists.

558

Robbins, S.J., Evans, P.N., Esterle, J.S., Go lding, S.D., Tyson, G.W., 2016. The effect of coal rank on

559

biogenic methane potential and microbial co mposition. International Journal of Coal Geo logy 154,

560

205-212.

561

Ross, D.E., Gu lliver, D., 2016. Reconstruction of a nearly complete Pseudomonas draft genome

562

sequence from a coalbed methane-produced water metagenome. Genome announcements 4,

563

e01024-01016.

564

Shimizu, S., A kiyama, M., Naganuma, T., Fujioka, M., Nako, M ., Ishijima, Y., 2007. Molecu lar

565

characterizat ion of microbial co mmun ities in deep coal seam groundwater of northern Japan. Geobiology

566

5, 423-433.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

545

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Shinoda, Y., Sakai, Y., Uenishi, H., Uchihashi, Y., Hiraishi, A., Yu kawa, H., Yurimoto, H., Kato, N., 2004.

568

Aerobic and anaerobic toluene degradation by a newly isolated denitrifying bacteriu m, Thauera sp. strain

569

DNT-1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 1385-1392.

570

Singh, D.N., Ku mar, A., Sarbhai, M .P., Tripathi, A.K., 2012. Cult ivation -independent analysis of

571

archaeal and bacterial co mmunit ies of the format ion water in an Indian coal bed to enhance

572

biotransformation of coal into methane. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 93, 1337-1350.

573

Stephen, A., Adebusuyi, A., Baldygin, A., Shuster, J., Southam, G., Budwill, K., Foght, J., Nobes, D.S.,

574

Mitra, S.K., 2014. Bioconversion of coal: new insights from a core flooding study. RSC Advances 4,

575

22779-22791.

576

Sträuber, H., Schröder, M., Kleinsteuber, S., 2012. Metabolic and microbial co mmunity dy namics during

577

the hydrolytic and acidogenic fermentation in a leach-bed process. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2,

578

1.

579

Strąpoć, D., Mastalerz, M ., Dawson, K., Macalady, J., Callaghan, A.V., Wawrik, B., Turich, C., Ashby,

580

M., 2011. Biogeochemistry of microbial coal-bed methane.

581

Strąpoć, D., Picardal, F.W., Turich, C., Schaperdoth, I., Macalady, J.L., Lipp, J.S., Lin, Y.-S., Ertefai, T.F.,

582

Schubotz, F., Hinrichs, K.-U., 2008. Methane-producing microbial co mmunity in a coal bed of the

583

Illinois Basin. Applied and environmental microbiology 74, 2424-2432.

584

Susilawat i, R., Evans, P.N., Esterle, J.S., Robbins, S.J., Tyson, G.W., Go lding, S.D., Mares, T.E., 2015.

585

Temporal changes in microbial co mmunity co mposition during culture enrich ment experiments with

586

Indonesian coals. International Journal of Coal Geology 137, 66-76.

587

Susilawat i, R., Papendick, S.L., Gilcrease, P.C., Esterle, J.S., Go lding, S.D., Mares, T.E., 2013.

588

Preliminary investigation of biogenic gas production in Indonesian low rank coals and implicatio ns for a

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

567

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

renewable energy source. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 77, 234-242.

590

Tang, Y.-Q., Ji, P., Lai, G.-L., Chi, C.-Q., Liu, Z.-S., Wu, X.-L., 2012. Diverse microbial co mmunity fro m

591

the coalbeds of the Ordos Basin, China. International Journal of Coal Geology 90, 21-33.

592

Vick, S.H., Greenfield, P., Tran-Dinh, N., Tetu, S.G., M idgley, D.J., Paulsen, I.T., 2018. The Coal Seam

593

Microbio me (CSM B) reference set, a lingua franca for the microbial coal -to-methane community.

594

International Journal of Coal Geology 186, 41-50.

595

Vick, S.H., Tetu, S.G., Sherwood, N., Pinetown, K., Sestak, S., Vallotton, P., Elbourne, L.D., Greenfield,

596

P., Johnson, E., Barton, D., 2016. Revealing colonisation and biofilm format ion of an adherent coal seam

597

associated microbial community on a coal surface. International Journal of Coal Geology 160, 42-50.

598

Webb, P.A., Orr, C., 1997. Analytical methods in fine particle technology. Micro meritics Instrument

599

Corp.

600

Wei, M., Yu, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhang, H., 2014. M icrobial d iversity and biogenic meth ane potential of a

601

thermogenic-gas coal mine. International Journal of Coal Geology 134, 96-107.

602

Wrighton, K.C., Tho mas, B.C., Sharon, I., M iller, C.S., Castelle, C.J., VerBerkmoes, N.C., Wilkins, M.J.,

603

Hettich, R.L., Lipton, M.S., Williams, K.H., 2012. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in

604

multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science 337, 1661-1665.

605

Xiong, J., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Zhang, H., Zeng, J., Hou, J., Yang, Y., Yao, T., Knight, R., Chu, H., 2012.

606

Geographic distance and pH drive bacteria l distribution in alkaline lake sediments across Tibetan Plateau.

607

Environmental microbiology 14, 2457-2466.

608

Yang, X., Chen, Y., Wu, R., Nie, Z., Han, Z., Tan, K., Chen, L., 2018. Potential of biogenic methane for

609

pilot-scale fermentation ex situ with lu mp anthracite and the changes of methanogenic consortia. Journal

610

of industrial microbiology & biotechnology 45, 229-237.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

589

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Yousaf, S., Afzal, M., Reichenauer, T.G., Brady, C.L., Sessitsch, A., 2011. Hydrocarbon degradation,

612

plant colonization and gene expression of alkane degradation genes by endophytic Enterobacter ludwigii

613

strains. Environmental pollution 159, 2675-2683.

614

Zhang, J., Liang, Y., Harpalani, S., 2016a. Optimization of methane production from b ituminous coal

615

through biogasification. Applied energy 183, 31-42.

616

Zhang, J., Park, S.Y., Liang, Y., Harpalan i, S., 2016b. Finding cost -effective nutrient solutions and

617

evaluating environmental conditions for biogasifying bituminous coal to methane ex situ. Applied

618

Energy 165, 559-568.

619

Zhang, R., Liu, S., Bahadur, J., Elsworth, D., Wang, Y., Hu, G., Liang, Y., 2017. Changes in pore

620

structure of coal caused by coal-to-gas bioconversion. Scientific reports 7, 3840.

621

Zheng, H., Chen, T., Rudolph, V., Go lding, S.D., 2017. Biogenic methane production from Bowen Basin

622

coal waste materials. International Journal of Coal Geology 169, 22-27.

623

Zheng, L., Liu, G., Qi, C., Zhang, Y., Wong, M., 2008. The use of sequential ext raction to determine the

624

distribution and modes of occurrence of mercury in Permian Huaibei coal, Anhui Province, China.

625

International Journal of Coal Geology 73, 139-155.

626

Zhou, H., Yang, Q., Cheng, Y., Ge, C., Chen, J., 2014. Methane drainage and utilization in coal mines

627

with strong coal and gas outburst dangers: a case study in Luling mine, Ch ina. Journal of Natural Gas

628

Science and Engineering 20, 357-365.

629 630

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

611

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights

632



Methane production was divided into lag, log, peak, and stationary phases.

633



Significant changes in bacterial communities were observed during the log phases.

634



Clostridiales increased obviously during the lag phase, but decreased thereafter.

635



Final coal samples showed changed chemical contents and increased microporosity.

AC C

EP T

ED

MA

NU

SC

RI

PT

631

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8