MicroRNA-based therapy in pain medicine: Current progress and future prospects

MicroRNA-based therapy in pain medicine: Current progress and future prospects

Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica 51 (2013) 171e176 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica journal homepage: www...

424KB Sizes 1 Downloads 43 Views

Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica 51 (2013) 171e176

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Acta Anaesthesiologica Taiwanica journal homepage: www.e-aat.com

Review Article

MicroRNA-based therapy in pain medicine: Current progress and future prospects Ping-Heng Tan 1, 2 *, Yun-Ying Pao 1 y, Jen-Kun Cheng 3, Kuo-Chuan Hung 1, Chien-Cheng Liu 1 1 2 3

Department of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan School of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan Department of Anesthesiology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

a r t i c l e i n f o

a b s t r a c t

Article history: Received 1 November 2013 Accepted 14 November 2013

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA molecules of 18e25 nucleotides in length that regulate gene expression involved in fundamental cell processes. The induction and chronification of pain is associated with many expressional changes in pain-related proteins. miRNA has the potential to regulate gene and protein expression associated with the induction and chronification of pain. Thus, miRNAs might have promise in therapy and as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in pain medicine. The application of miRNA has been an emerging field in pain research in recent years. Many studies focusing on the regulation of miRNAs under different tissue and nociceptive stimuli have been performed in recent years. In this review, we intend to introduce the most recent research in the field of miRNA related with pain medicine such as the expression and function of miRNA in different animal pain model, the challenge of application and delivery of miRNA in vivo, the potential toxic effects of miRNA and future problems in clinical application that need to be resolved. This review focuses on the results of miRNA in animal studies and the prospect for future success. Copyright Ó 2013, Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

Key words: inflammation; microRNAs; pain; pain: neuropathic; visceral pain

1. Introduction RNA interference is a post-transcriptional gene regulating mechanism by small double-stranded RNAs, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs). miRNAs are small noncoding RNAs of 18e25 nucleotides that regulate gene expression involved in cell development, differentiation, and proliferation.1 Each miRNA has the potential to target many genes.2e5 An estimated 60% of mRNAs are predicted to interact with more than one miRNA.2e5 The 30 untranslated region (UTR) of a single gene is predicted to be targeted by several different miRNAs with bioinformatical analysis.2,3 The ability of miRNAs to work together to regulate gene expression has also been proved by experiment.6 As the pathophysiological change of pain is associated with changes of expression in pain-related proteins, miRNAs might be a promising tool to manage inflammatory and neuropathic pain by modulating

Conflicts of interest: All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest. * Corresponding author. Department of Anesthesiology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, 1, Yi-Da Road, Yan-Chao District, Kaohsiung 824, Taiwan. E-mail address: [email protected] (P.-H. Tan). y Contributed equally to this article as first author.

the expression of gene and protein involved in pain processing pathways. In the past years, siRNAs have already been applied in many pain studies,7 and miRNAs are a rising field in pain research. Therefore, we will review and summarize the recent findings on miRNAs in pain research and discuss whether they could be a potential target for pain management. 2. The mechanism of miRNA biogenesis miRNAs are mostly transcribed as primary transcripts of long primary miRNAs from intragenic or intergenic regions by RNA polymerase II (Fig. 1).8 The primary transcripts are further processed by Drosha ribonuclease in the nucleus into a hairpin intermediate of about 70e100 nucleotides, called pre-miRNA.9 The pre-miRNA is then transported out of the nucleus to the cytoplasm by exportin 5.10 The pre-miRNAs are then processed by another ribonuclease called Dicer into a mature double-stranded miRNA of about 18e25 nucleotides in the cytoplasm.11 The guide strand or mature miRNA is incorporated into an RNA-induced silencing complex, which separates the miRNA duplex as single strand with sequence complementary to specific target mRNA. With perfect base pairing between miRNA and mRNA, the mRNA is commonly degraded.

1875-4597/$ e see front matter Copyright Ó 2013, Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aat.2013.11.001

172

Fig. 1. Pathway of miRNA biogenesis. miRNAs are expressed either from an intergenic cluster or from single genetic regions and form long hairpin RNAs called primary microRNAs (pri-miRNAs). pri-miRNAs are cleaved by Drosha ribonuclease into smaller, roughly 70e100 nucleotide hairpin RNAs termed precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). pre-miRNAs are exported from the nucleus by exportin-5 to the cytoplasm, where another ribonuclease called Dicer, cleaves them into a mature double-stranded miRNA of 18e25 nucleotides long. A mature miRNA is then assembled into a RNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC). This complex most commonly binds to the 30 -untranslated sequences of particular mRNAs through partially complementary sequences and prevents the mRNAs from being translated into protein. If the miRNA is exactly or nearly exactly complementary to an mRNA, it will result in cleavage of target mRNA.

miRNAs with imperfect complementarity to mRNA usually bind to the 30 UTR of mRNA and inhibit translation of mRNA.12 The RNAinduced silencing complex is the effector complex of the miRNA pathway and is comprised of miRNA, argonaute proteins (argonaute 1e4), and other protein factors.13,14 Argonaute proteins have a crucial role in miRNA biogenesis, maturation. and miRNA effector functions.13,14 3. Challenges and considerations in the application and delivery of miRNA There are two main strategies to target miRNA expression in pain treatment. Direct strategies involve the use of oligonucleotides or virus-based constructs to either block the over-expression of miRNA or to substitute for the loss of expression of miRNA. The indirect strategy involves the use of drugs to modulate miRNA expression by targeting their transcription and their processing. To overexpress miRNAs, miRNA mimics can be applied as precursor or as mature miRNA sequences.15 miRNA inhibitors comprise antisense oligonucleotides (anti-miRNAs),16 miRNA sponges,17 or miRNA decoys.18 Antisense oligonucleotides work as competitive inhibitors of miRNAs by annealing to the mature miRNA guide strand and inducing degradation or stoichiometric duplex formation. “miRNA sponges” are longer RNA molecules able to inhibit several miRNAs simultaneously. Several databases such as TargetScan, MiRWalk, miRanda, PICTAR5, and network analysis using

P.-H. Tan et al.

Ingenuity Software Analysis have been used to analyze the potential target gene of miRNA. The bloodebrain barrier, a natural barrier hindering the access of miRNA to the central nervous system, is a major challenge for delivery of miRNA into the central nervous system. Some successful approaches for gene silencing in the central nervous system have been reported such as stereotaxic surgery,19 use of viral vectors,20 and transgenic constructions.21 The addition of cholesterol molecule to the sense strand, making the molecule lipophilic, binding high-density lipoprotein, successfully targeting tissues with highdensity lipoprotein receptors such as oligodendrocytes in the brain has been reported.22 Another reported specific approach is the immunoliposome, a complex of a receptor-directed monoclonal antibody, liposome, and the studied molecule.23 Delivery with immunoliposome enables the conjugated siRNA to cross the bloodebrain barrier and reach specific regions of the brain.24 A similar approach with PEGylated immunoliposomes coated with an antibody against receptors for insulin and/or transferrin for delivering siRNA to the brain in mouse has also been reported.25 Delivery of miRNA-specific oligonucleotides constitutes another obstacle for their in vivo application. Although miRNAs are highly stable in vivo and show long-lasting efficacy26 due to a relatively high resistance against nucleolytic degradation27 compared with mRNA. Several chemical modifications are necessary to prolong half-life in vivo, such as use of deoxyribonucleotides in the duplex overhangs giving greater resistance to nucleases.28 The use of locked-nucleic acids (LNA, instead of RNA) 29 and adding phosphorothioate linkages in selected positions or substitution of the 20 ribose at certain positions for 20 fluoropyrimidines also increases resistance to nucleases.30 It also has been reported that a single 20 O-methyl group on the passenger strand of a siRNA duplex can prevent toxicity due to the activation of type I interferon pathway gene expression and hinder Toll-like receptor activation.31 4. Development and activity-dependent regulation of miRNAs in pain processing After tissue injury, changes in many transmitters, ionic channels, and proteins contribute to the development of central and peripheral sensitization which is considered as the cause of chronic pain.32 Because miRNAs are involved in the regulation of protein and gene expression, it is possible that they also play a role in pain processing pathways. For example, Vo et al33 reported that miR132 was identified as a target of the transcription factor, cAMP-response element binding protein. miR132 is enriched in neurons and is highly induced by neurotrophins. Expression of miR132 in cortical neurons induced neurite outgrowth. Conversely, inhibition of miR132 function attenuated neuronal outgrowth. miR132 regulates neuronal morphogenesis by decreasing levels of the GTPaseactivating protein, p250GAP.33 p250GAP also interacts with the glutamate receptor NR2A/B subunits, PSD-95 and b-catenin.34,35 Thus, it is possible that miR132 plays a role in memory consolidation and long-term neuronal plasticity. Wibrand et al36 examined miRNA expression during long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus by high-frequency stimulation, which induces transcription of miR-132/212 that is metabotropic glutamate receptor dependent and functionally not correlated with long-term potentiation. By contrast, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation selectively downregulates mature miR-132, miR-212, and miR-219 levels, indicating accelerated decay of these mature miRNAs.36 Recently, in primary hippocampal neuron cultures, Spronsen et al37 demonstrated that 51 miRNAs, including miR-134, miR-146, miR-181, miR-185, miR-191, and miR-200a, show altered patterns of expression after NMDA receptordependent plasticity, and 31 miRNAs, including miR-107, miR-

MicroRNA-based therapy in pain medicine

173

134, miR-470, and miR-546 were upregulated by homeostatic plasticity protocols. Their results indicate that specific miRNA expression profiles correlate with changes in neuronal development and neuronal activity.37 These studies indicate that identification and characterization of miRNA targets may elucidate translational control mechanisms involved in neuron development, differentiation, and activity-depended pain processing.33,36,37 5. miRNAs in inflammatory and neuropathic pain The analysis and validation of miRNAs in different tissue and pain conditions have been reported in many papers (Table 1). Bai et al33 first report the downregulation of miRNAs in ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion neurons following inflammatory muscle pain. In this study, selective miRNAs (miR-10a, miR-29a, miR-98, miR99a, miR-124a, miR-134, and miR-183) were differentially and significantly repressed in ipsilateral trigeminal ganglion neurons after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA)-induced muscle pain. The downregulation of specific miRNAs was considered to enhance the expression of proinflammatory and pronociceptive proteins and thereby facilitate the development of inflammation and allodynia.38 For studying the nociception-induced dysregulation of miRNA in the prefrontal cortex, miR-155 and miR-223 were upregulated in the ipsilateral and contralateral prefrontal cortex in facial carrageenan-induced inflammation. The potential targets of the two miRNAsdc/ebp b and granulocyte colony-stimulating factordwere also studied. Significantly downregulated c/ebp b but upregulated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were found in the prefrontal cortex of facial carrageenan treated mice. It is postulated that this could lead to increased inflammation and activation of the prefrontal cortex.39 To examine the role of small RNAs in peripheral pain pathways, Zhao et al40 deleted the enzyme Dicer in mouse postmitotic damage-sensing neurons. Deletion of Dicer, an essential enzyme for the generation of mature miRNAs, led to diminished expression of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and sodium channel NaV1.8. Inflammatory pain and the number of c-FOS positive neuron in the spinal cord were also attenuated and abolished. However, the deletion of Dicer left the Ad- and C-fiber mediated pain transmission of the acute nociception unaffected. These results indicate that miRNAs are involved in modulating pain thresholds in inflammatory pain and possibly with therapeutic impact.40 In a model of spinal nerve ligation, expression of miRNAs-96, miR-182, and miR-183 are downregulated in ipsilateral dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in rats. The change suggested that altered miRNA expression is a response to nerve injury and is functionally involved in the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain.41 With the same model of spinal nerve model, Schack et al42 performed a miRNA expression profiling study of DRG tissue from rats 4 weeks postespinal-nerve ligation revealed significant change in the expression of 63 miRNAs. Of these, 59 were downregulated in the ipsilateral L4 DRG, not the injured L5 DRG, suggesting that miRNA changes in the uninjured afferents may underlie the

development and maintenance of neuropathic pain.42 Surprisingly, Brandenburger et al43 characterized the specific expression pattern of miRNAs in the rat spinal cord in the chronic constriction injury (CCI) model of neuropathic pain in rats. This study further evaluated the time-dependent changes in expression patterns of spinal miRNAs. With miRNA array analysis, only minor changes were observed in miRNA expression levels in the rat spinal cord induced by CCI. Further validation of minor changes in expression levels of miRNAs by real-time quantitative PCR, the relative expression levels of miR-30b, miR-100, miR-10a, miR-99a, and miR-720 were not significantly altered at the investigated time points after CCI to the sciatic nerve. Because induction of neuropathic pain by CCI did not lead to relevant differences in spinal miRNA expression levels at any studied time point, the authors summarized that modulation of miRNAs does not seem to contribute significantly to the changes in gene expression in the spinal cord in this model of chronic neuropathic pain.43 However, in Genda et al’s study,44 111 miRNAs were significantly regulated in CCI rats in both the Day 7 and Day 14 groups compared with sham rats in both groups. Of these 111, there were 75 miRNAs (67.6%) that had been analyzed in previous reports. Certain miRNAs (miR-500, miR-221, and miR-21) were reported to be related to neuropathic pain. Thus, significant change was noted in the expression levels of a large number of miRNAs in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in CCI rats.44 Kusuda et al45 were able to show that miR-1, miR-16, and miR-206 are differentially regulated in DRGs after induction of acute, inflammatory, and neuropathic pain in mice, whereas in the spinal cord dorsal horn the same miRNAs were regulated only in inflammatory pain, but not in neuropathic or acute pain. The discrepancy in miRNA expression independent pain models shown in these studies suggests that the expression of miRNAs are stimulus-specific. Apart from profiling of miRNAs in different pain conditions, validation of a single specific miRNA function is a more promising approach to the treatment of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Among the miRNAs dysregulated in the DRG, miR-21 expression is consistently shown to increase after multiple types of peripheral nerve injury.46,47 In Sakai and Suzuki’s study,48 both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in the neuropathic pain were attenuated by intrathecal administration of miR-21 inhibitor after ligation of the left fifth lumbar spinal nerve. miR-21 is specifically upregulated in the injured DRG neurons and causally involved in the late phase of neuropathic pain. The study performed by Kynast et al49 focused on the regulation and function of miR-124a in the spinal cord of mice in a formalin model of inflammatory nociception. miR-124a is constitutively expressed in the spinal cord of mice, particularly in neurons of the dorsal horn and is significantly downregulated by formalin-induced inflammation. Knock-down of miR-124a by intravenous administration of a specific miR-124a inhibitor increased the nociceptive behavior associated with an upregulation of the pain-relevant miR-124a target MeCP2 and proinflammatory marker genes. By contrast, administration of a miR-124a mimic counteracted these effects and decreased nociception. Conclusively, the data indicate that miR-124a is involved in

Table 1 Dysregulated miRNA in different tissues in different animal models of pain. Pain condition

Tissue

miRNA

Refs

Inflammatory pain Inflammatory pain Inflammatory pain Incisional pain Neuropathic pain Neuropathic pain Visceral pain Visceral pain

Spinal cord Dorsal root ganglia Brain Peripheral tissue Spinal cord Dorsal root ganglia Spinal cord, cell culture, human bladder Colon, small bowel

miR-1,-16,-206,-124a miR-10a,-29a, -98,-99a,-124a,-134, -183, Dicer deletion, -1,-16,-206,-143 miR-155,-223 miR-203 miR-500,-221,-21,-103 miR-96,-182 ,-183, -1,-16,-206,-21 miR-181a,-449b, -500,-328,-320, -199a-5p miR-29a

45,49 38,40,50 39 52 44,45,51 41,45e48 61e63 64

174

inflammatory nociception by regulation of relevant target proteins.49 In animal models of peripheral inflammation (injection of CFA) and nerve damage (transection of the sciatic nerve), Tam Tam et al50 found that expression levels of miR-143 were significant lower in DRGs ipsilateral to CFA injection but not in nerve damage. Expression levels of miR-143 were also significantly higher in isolectin B4 (I-B4) binding sensory neurons compared with the I-B4 negative neurons. The results demonstrate for the first time that miR-143 is expressed in nociceptive neurons. miR-143 could selectively contribute to mRNA regulation in specific populations of nociceptors.50 A recent functional study51 showed that miR-103 is downregulated in neuropathic animals and that intrathecal applications of miR-103 successfully relieve pain. Upregulation of CaV1.2-comprising L-type calcium channel in spinal dorsal horn has a crucial role in chronic neuropathic pain. miR-103 simultaneously regulates the expression of the three subunits forming CaV1.2-comprising L-type calcium channel upon relieving pain. Several studies examining the analgesic effect of miRNA on skin or muscle have been reported. miR-203 is known to be involved in keratinocyte growth, differentiation, and skin inflammation. Sun et al52 reported that levels of miR-203 were strongly downregulated in keratinocytes after incision. Phospholipase A2 activating protein is a candidate for regulation by miR-203. The authors observed that a miR-203 mimic molecule could block the substance P-induced increase in phospholipase A2 activating protein expression in the rat epidermal keratinocyte cell line. The authors provided evidence for a novel mechanism as contributing to incisional pain, but do not suggest that it could be entirely responsible for incisional pain.52 Similarly, exploring the analgesic effect on peripheral nervous system, Ikeuchi et al53 reported that intramuscular injection of miRNA targeting acid-sensing ion channel 3 could relieve the mechanical hyperalgesia in muscle and paw in the carrageenan-induced muscle inflammation. Pain is a common complication of diabetic neuropathy that, despite substantial advances in understanding of pathophysiology, remains relatively refractory to treatment with available agents. Significant increases in the amount of voltage gated sodium channel isoforms NaV1.7 and NaV1.3 protein in the DRG of rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes have been demonstrated. To examine the role of NaVa subunit levels in DRG in the pathogenesis of pain in diabetic neuropathy, Chattopadhyay et al54 constructed a nonreplicating herpes simplex virus-based vector expressing a miRNA against NaVa subunits. The data revealed subcutaneous inoculation of the miRexpressing herpes simplex virus vector into the feet of diabetic rats to transduce DRG resulted in a reduction in NaVa subunit levels in DRG neurons and a reduction in cold allodynia, thermal hyperalgesia, and mechanical hyperalgesia. The results elucidate the role of increased NaVa protein in DRG in the pathogenesis of pain in diabetic neuropathy.54 miRNAs have also been reported to be involved in the development of opioid tolerance. Employing bioinformatics, He et al55 identified a let-7 binding site in the 30 -UTR of m-opioid receptor (MOR1) mRNA and confirmed it as a direct target of let-7 in their study. The repressive regulation of MOR by let-7 was revealed in SH-SY5Y cells. Conversely, morphine significantly upregulated let-7 expression in SH-SY5Y cells and in a mouse model of opioid tolerance. The LNA-let-7 inhibitor decreased brain let-7 levels and partially attenuated opioid antinociceptive tolerance in mice. let-7 was further identified as a mediator translocating and sequestering MOR mRNA to P-bodies, leading to translation repression. The data suggests that let-7 plays an integral role in opioid tolerance.55 Based on in silico analysis, an exact match to the seed sequence of miR-134 was found in the 30 -UTR of MOR1. Using CFA-induced chronic inflammatory pain model, Ni et al56 investigated the expression profiles of miR-134 and MOR1 in rat DRG. Their result

P.-H. Tan et al.

revealed that miR-134 expression level was inversely related to MOR1 expression. These data suggested a model that miR-134 participated in CFA-induced inflammatory pain by balancing the expression of MOR1 in DRGs.56 6. Transcriptional gene silencing RNA-directed DNA methylation is another interesting phenomenon triggered by RNA duplexes which lead to the methylation of the gene promoter region and result in transcriptional gene silencing.57 siRNA-mediated transcriptional gene silencing was first reported in human cells by Morris et al58 in 2004. Recently, another study revealed repressed miR-200b and miR-429 in NMDAz1 positive neurons of the nucleus accumbens is associated with an upregulation of the predicted miR-200b/miR-429 target DNAmethyltransferase 3a (DNMT3a) 7 days after sciatic nerve ligation.59 It is well recognized that DNMT3a is an important DNA methyltransferase that is expressed in postmitotic neurons. DNA methylation can induce long-term transcriptional silencing by directly interfering with transcription factor binding. The results provide new insight into an epigenetic modification that is accompanied by a dramatic decrease in miR200b and miR429 under a neuropathic pain. These phenomena may result in an increase in DNMT3a under neuropathic pain, which leads to the long-term transcription-silencing of several genes. In neuroscience research, RNA-directed DNA methylation might promote a permanent effect, making unnecessary the repetitive siRNAs administrations.60 7. miRNAs in visceral pain miRNA functions have also been investigated in animal models of chronic pelvic pain including of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Sengupta et al61 recently examined the hypothesis that long-term hypersensitivity in neonatal zymosan-induced cystitis is due to miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional suppression of the developing spinal GABAergic system. Cystitis was produced by intravesicular injection of zymosan into the bladder during postnatal days. Significant upregulation of mature miR-181a in the L6eS1 spinal dorsal horns was found in zymosan-treated rats. The target gene analysis demonstrated multiple complementary binding sites in miR-181a for the GABAA receptor subunit GABAAa-1 gene. An increase in miR-181a concomitantly resulted in a significant downregulation of GABA Aa-1 receptor subunit gene and protein expression in adult spinal cords from rats with neonatal cystitis. It is suggested that this change in spinal cord contributes to the long term sensitization of pain processing in patients with chronic pelvic pain.61 Using cellbased models, Sanchez et al62 showed that prolonged exposure of neurokinin (NK)1 receptor to substance P caused a decrease of NK1 receptor mRNA levels and a concomitant increase of regulatory miRNAs miR-449b and miR-500. In the biopsies of BPS patients, the same miRNAs were significantly increased, suggesting that BPS promotes an attenuation of NK1 receptor synthesis via activation of specific miRNAs. Finally, the authors identified 31 differentially expressed miRNAs in BPS patients and demonstrated a direct correlation between miR-449b, miR-500, miR-328, and miR-320 and a downregulation of NK1 receptor mRNA and/or protein levels. Defects in urothelial integrity resulting in leakage and activation of underlying sensory nerves are possible causative factors of bladder pain syndrome.62 Monastyrskaya et al63 highlight a possible link between miR-199a-5p expression and the control of urothelial permeability in bladder pain syndrome. Upregulation of miR-199a5p and concomitant downregulation of its multiple targets might determine the impact of a tight urothelial barrier, leading to chronic bladder pain syndrome.63 In IBS patients with increased intestinal

MicroRNA-based therapy in pain medicine

membrane permeability, increased expression of miR-29a was found in blood microvesicles, small bowel, and colon tissues. miR29a has a complementary site in the 30 -UTRs of the glutamateammonia ligase gene that leads to decreased glutamine synthetase levels, increased intestinal permeability and chronic visceral pain in IBS patients. Suppressing the expression of miR-29a in vitro will restore intestinal permeability.64 In summary, these studies indicate that miRNAs are involved in the onset and progression of neural sensitization and play an important role in inflammatory, neuropathic and visceral nociception. Therefore, these studies provided targets miRNAs for treatment of inflammatory, neuropathic, and visceral pain. 8. Potential side effects As discussed above, proper delivery and appropriate stability are two major concerns for in vivo delivery of miRNAs. Development of viral vectors/polypeptides and chemical modifications are expected to overcome such hurdles in the application of RNA interference in neurological application. Except for the problems of delivery and stability, the major difficulty in application of miRNAs is their offtarget effects. miRNAs regulate many genes, the potential offtarget effects of miRNA may produce toxic phenotypes,65,66 e.g., T helper 1 cell responses of immune reaction.67 These problems could be solved by designing and constructing effective systems that deliver the synthetic miRNA specifically to target genes in the cells. The activation of that immune system is also a potential side effects: an increased activation of immune mechanisms that are stimulated by small molecules similar to viral defense pathways must be considered.68 Nonspecific immunological activities triggered by certain CpG motifs in the oligonucleotides that activate interferon and other cytokine responses mediated by Toll-like cell receptors and other inflammasome effectors have also been reported.66,69 Therefore, therapy with miRNAs might also induce allergic reactions and specific immune reactions by production of specific antibodies against the oligonucleotides. However, so far the use of LNA anti-miRNA has proved safe when tested in nonhuman primates.70,71 9. Conclusions In recent years, miRNAs have gained increasing interest as research tools, biomarkers, and as a potential new treatment of pain. Many studies focusing on the regulation of miRNAs under different tissue and nociceptive stimulus have been performed. In the near future, a trend toward studying the expression and function of a single specific miRNA and its target genes can be observed. Understanding the distinct roles of a single miRNA in diverse pain conditions and tissue types will be one of the great challenges in the future. The recent research of application of miRNAs in pain medicine have demonstrated early promise in the treatment of pain. However, challenges with respect to the use of miRNA-based therapeutics such as poor cellular uptake or a low bioavailability as well as off-target effects or long-term safety concerns in humans remain to be further explored. Therefore, the future prospects of miRNA-based treatment will require further adjustments to maximize miRNAs potency while minimizing off target toxicity and immunogenicity. Acknowledgments This work was supported by National Science Council grants NSC 100-2314-B-214-002-MY3 and NSC 102-2321-B-214-001-, and E-Da Hospital grants EDPJ 102043 and 102044, Taiwan.

175

References 1. Ambros V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 2004;431:350e5. 2. Lewis BP, Shih IH, Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Burge CB. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 2003;115:787e98. 3. Krek A, Grün D, Poy MN, Wolf R, Rosenberg L, Epstein EJ, et al. Combinatorial microRNA target predictions. Nat Genet 2005;37:495e500. 4. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:D149e53. 5. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res 2009;19:92e105. 6. Ivanovska I, Cleary MA. Combinatorial microRNAs: working together to make a difference. Cell Cycle 2008;7:3137e42. 7. Tan PH, Yang LC, Ji RR. Therapeutic potential of RNA interference in pain medicine. Open Pain J 2009;2:57e63. 8. Rodriguez A, Griffiths-Jones S, Ashurst JL, Bradley A. Identification of mammalian microRNA host genes and transcription units. Genome Res 2004;14:1902e10. 9. Lee Y, Ahn C, Han J, Choi H, Kim J, Yim J, et al. The nuclear RNase III Drosha initiates microRNA processing. Nature 2003;425:415e9. 10. Bohnsack MT, Czaplinski K, Gorlich D. Exportin 5 is a RanGTP-dependent dsRNA-binding protein that mediates nuclear export of pre-miRNAs. RNA 2004;10:185e91. 11. Hammond SM, Bernstein E, Beach D, Hannon GJ. An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophila cells. Nature 2000;404:293e6. 12. Preall JB, Sontheimer EJ. RNAi: RISC gets loaded. Cell 2005;123:543e5. 13. Hutvágner G, Zamore PD. A microRNA in a multiple-turnover RNAi enzyme complex. Science 2002;297:2056e60. 14. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 2009;136:215e33. 15. Tsuda N, Mine T, Ioannides CG, Chang DZ. Synthetic microRNA targeting glioma-associated antigen-1 protein. Methods Mol Biol 2009;487:435e49. 16. Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Pena J, Tuschl T, et al. Specificity, duplex degradation and subcellular localization of antagomirs. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:2885e92. 17. Ebert MS, Sharp PA. MicroRNA sponges: progress and possibilities. RNA 2010;16:2043e50. 18. Haraguchi T, Ozaki Y, Iba H. Vectors expressing efficient RNA decoys achieve the long-term suppression of specific microRNA activity in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:e43. 19. Bahi A, Boyer F, Kolira M, Dreyer JL. In vivo gene silencing of CD81 by lentiviral expression of small interference RNAs suppresses cocaine-induced behaviour. J Neurochem 2005;92:1243e55. 20. Pfeifer A, Eigenbrod S, Al-Khadra S, Hofmann A, Mitteregger G, Moser M, et al. Lentivector-mediated RNAi efficiently suppresses prion protein and prolongs survival of scrapie-infected mice. J Clin Invest 2006;116:3204e10. 21. Carmell MA, Zhang L, Conklin DS, Hannon GJ, Rosenquist TA. Germline transmission of RNAi in mice. Nat Struct Biol 2003;10:91e2. 22. Chen Q, Butler D, Querbes W, Pandey RK, Ge P, Maier MA, et al. Lipophilic siRNAs mediate efficient gene silencing in oligodendrocytes with direct CNS delivery. J Control Release 2010;144:227e32. 23. Yang T, Choi MK, Cui FD, Lee SJ, Chung SJ, Shim CK, et al. Antitumor effect of paclitaxel-loaded PEGylated immunoliposomes against human breast cancer cells. Pharm Res 2007;24:2402e11. 24. Boado RJ. Blood-brain barrier transport of non-viral gene and RNAi therapeutics. Pharm Res 2007;24:1772e87. 25. Zhang Y, Zhang YF, Bryant J, Charles A, Boado RJ, Pardridge WM. Intravenous RNA interference gene therapy targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor prolongs survival in intracranial brain cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10: 3667e77. 26. Doleshal M, Magotra AA, Choudhury B, Cannon BD, Labourier E, Szafranska AE. Evaluation and validation of total RNA extraction methods for microRNA expression analyses in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 2008;10:203e11. 27. Chen X, Ba Y, Ma L, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang K, et al. Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. Cell Res 2008;18:997e1006. 28. Schrofelbauer B, Hakata Y, Landau NR. HIV-1 Vpr function is mediated by interaction with the damage-specific DNA-binding protein DDB1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:4130e5. 29. Fluiter K, Mook OR, Baas F. The therapeutic potential of LNA-modified siRNAs: reduction of off-target effects by chemical modification of the siRNA sequence. Methods Mol Biol 2009;487:189e203. 30. Morrissey DV, Lockridge JA, Shaw L, Blanchard K, Jensen K, Breen W, et al. Potent and persistent in vivo anti-HBV activity of chemically modified siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:1002e7. 31. Robbins M, Judge A, Liang L, McClintock K, Yaworski E, MacLachlan I. 20 -Omethyl-modified RNAs act as TLR7 antagonists. Mol Ther 2007;15:1663e9. 32. Ji RR, Kohno T, Moore KA, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization and LTP: do pain and memory share similar mechanisms? Trends Neurosci 2003;26:696e705. 33. Vo N, Klein ME, Varlamova O, Keller DM, Yamamoto T, Goodman RH, et al. A cAMP-response element binding protein-induced microRNA regulates neuronal morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16426e31.

176 34. Nakazawa T, Watabe AM, Tezuka T, Yoshida Y, Yokoyama K, Umemori H, et al. p250GAP, a novel brain-enriched GTPase-activating protein for Rho family GTPases, is involved in the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor signaling. Mol Biol Cell 2003;14:2921e34. 35. Okabe T, Nakamura T, Nishimura YN, Kohu K, Ohwada S, Morishita Y, et al. RICS, a novel GTPase-activating protein for Cdc42 and Rac1, is involved in the beta-catenin-N-cadherin and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 2003;278:9920e7. 36. Wibrand K, Panja D, Tiron A, Ofte ML, Skaftnesmo KO, Lee CS, et al. Differential regulation of mature and precursor microRNA expression by NMDA and metabotropic glutamate receptor activation during LTP in the adult dentate gyrus in vivo. Eur J Neurosci 2010;31:636e45. 37. van Spronsen M, van Battum EY, Kuijpers M, Vangoor VR, Rietman ML, Pothof J, et al. Developmental and activity-dependent miRNA expression profiling in primary hippocampal neuron cultures. PLoS One 2013;8:e74907. 38. Bai G, Ambalavanar R, Wei D, Dessem D. Downregulation of selective microRNAs in trigeminal ganglion neurons following inflammatory muscle pain. Mol Pain 2007;3:15. 39. Poh KW, Yeo JF, Ong WY. MicroRNA changes in the mouse prefrontal cortex after inflammatory pain. Eur J Pain 2011;15. 801.e1ee12. 40. Zhao J, Lee MC, Momin A, Cendan CM, Shepherd ST, Baker MD, et al. Small RNAs control sodium channel expression, nociceptor excitability, and pain thresholds. J Neurosci 2010;30:10860e71. 41. Aldrich BT, Frakes EP, Kasuya J, Hammond DL, Kitamoto T. Changes in expression of sensory organ-specific microRNAs in rat dorsal root ganglia in association with mechanical hypersensitivity induced by spinal nerve ligation. Neuroscience 2009;164:711e23. 42. von Schack D, Agostino MJ, Murray BS, Li Y, Reddy PS, Chen J, et al. Dynamic changes in the microRNA expression profile reveal multiple regulatory mechanisms in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain. PLoS One 2011;6: e17670. 43. Brandenburger T, Castoldi M, Brendel M, Grievink H, Schlosser L, Werdehausen R, et al. Expression of spinal cord microRNAs in a rat model of chronic neuropathic pain. Neurosci Lett 2012;506:281e6. 44. Genda Y, Arai M, Ishikawa M, Tanaka S, Okabe T, Sakamoto A. microRNA changes in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord of rats with chronic constriction injury: A TaqManÒ Low Density Array study. Int J Mol Med 2013;31:129e37. 45. Kusuda R, Cadetti F, Ravanelli MI, Sousa TA, Zanon S, De Lucca FL, et al. Differential expression of microRNAs in mouse pain models. Mol Pain 2011;7:17. 46. Strickland IT, Richards L, Holmes FE, Wynick D, Uney JB, Wong LF. Axotomyinduced miR-21 promotes axon growth in adult dorsal root ganglion neurons. PLoS One 2011;6:e23423. 47. Wu D, Raafat M, Pak E, Hammond S, Murashov AK. MicroRNA machinery responds to peripheral nerve lesion in an injury-regulated pattern. Neuroscience 2011;190:386e97. 48. Sakai A, Suzuki H. Nerve injury-induced upregulation of miR-21 in the primary sensory neurons contributes to neuropathic pain in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013;435:176e81. 49. Kynast KL, Russe OQ, Moser CV, Geisslinger G, Niederberger E. Modulation of central nervous system-specific microRNA-124a alters the inflammatory response in the formalin test in mice. Pain 2013;154:368e76. 50. Tam Tam S, Bastian I, Zhou XF, Vander Hoek M, Michael MZ, Gibbins IL, et al. MicroRNA-143 expression in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Cell Tissue Res 2011;346:163e73. 51. Favereaux A, Thoumine O, Bouali-Benazzouz R, Roques V, Papon MA, Salam SA, et al. Bidirectional integrative regulation of Cav1.2 calcium channel by microRNA miR-103: role in pain. EMBO J 2011;30:3830e41.

P.-H. Tan et al. 52. Sun Y, Li XQ, Sahbaie P, Shi XY, Li WW, Liang DY, et al. miR-203 regulates nociceptive sensitization after incision by controlling phospholipase A2 activating protein expression. Anesthesiology 2012;117:626e38. 53. Ikeuchi M, Kolker SJ, Burnes LA, Walder RY, Sluka KA. Role of ASIC3 in the primary and secondary hyperalgesia produced by joint inflammation in mice. Pain 2008;137:662e9. 54. Chattopadhyay M, Zhou Z, Hao S, Mata M, Fink DJ. Reduction of voltage gated sodium channel protein in DRG by vector mediated miRNA reduces pain in rats with painful diabetic neuropathy. Mol Pain 2012;8:17. 55. He Y, Yang C, Kirkmire CM, Wang ZJ. Regulation of opioid tolerance by let-7 family microRNA targeting the mu opioid receptor. J Neurosci 2010;30: 10251e8. 56. Ni J, Gao Y, Gong S, Guo S, Hisamitsu T, Jiang X. Regulation of mu-opioid type 1 receptors by microRNA134 in dorsal root ganglion neurons following peripheral inflammation. Eur J Pain 2013;17:313e23. 57. Noma K, Sugiyama T, Cam H, Verdel A, Zofall M, Jia S, et al. RITS acts in cis to promote RNA interference-mediated transcriptional and post-transcriptional silencing. Nat Genet 2004;36:1174e80. 58. Morris KV, Chan SW, Jacobsen SE, Looney DJ. Small interfering RNA-induced transcriptional gene silencing in human cells. Science 2004;305:1289e92. 59. Imai S, Saeki M, Yanase M, Horiuchi H, Abe M, Narita M, et al. Change in microRNAs associated with neuronal adaptive responses in the nucleus accumbens under neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 2011;31:15294e9. 60. Vastenhouw NL, Brunschwig K, Okihara KL, Müller F, Tijsterman M, Plasterk RH. Gene expression: long-term gene silencing by RNAi. Nature 2006;442:882. 61. Sengupta JN, Pochiraju S, Kannampalli P, Bruckert M, Addya S, Yadav P, et al. MicroRNA-mediated GABA Aalpha-1 receptor subunit down-regulation in adult spinal cord following neonatal cystitis-induced chronic visceral pain in rats. Pain 2013;154:59e70. 62. Sanchez Freire V, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Kuhn A, Draeger A, Monastyrskaya K. MicroRNAs may mediate the down-regulation of neurokinin-1 receptor in chronic bladder pain syndrome. Am J Pathol 2010;176:288e303. 63. Monastyrskaya K, Sánchez-Freire V, Hashemi Gheinani A, Klumpp DJ, Babiychuk EB, Draeger A, et al. miR-199a-5p regulates urothelial permeability and may play a role in bladder pain syndrome. Am J Pathol 2013;182:431e48. 64. Zhou Q, Souba WW, Croce CM, Verne GN. MicroRNA-29a regulates intestinal membrane permeability in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2010;59:775e84. 65. Aagaard L, Rossi JJ. RNAi therapeutics: principles, prospects and challenges. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007;59:75e86. 66. Dias N, Stein CA. Antisense oligonucleotides: basic concepts and mechanisms. Mol Cancer Ther 2002;1:347e55. 67. Xu H, Cheung IY, Guo HF, Cheung NK. MicroRNA miR-29 modulates expression of immunoinhibitory molecule B7-H3: potential implications for immune based therapy of human solid tumors. Cancer Res 2009;69:6275e81. 68. Bridge AJ, Pebernard S, Ducraux A, Nicoulaz AL, Iggo R. Induction of an interferon response by RNAi vectors in mammalian cells. Nat Genet 2003;34: 263e4. 69. Hornung V, Guenthner-Biller M, Bourquin C, Ablasser A, Schlee M, Uematsu S, et al. Sequence-specific potent induction of IFN-alpha by short interfering RNA in plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7. Nat Med 2005;11:263e70. 70. Elmén J, Lindow M, Schütz S, Lawrence M, Petri A, Obad S, et al. LNA-mediated microRNA silencing in non-human primates. Nature 2008;452:896e9. 71. Lanford RE, Hildebrandt-Eriksen ES, Petri A, Persson R, Lindow M, Munk ME, et al. Therapeutic silencing of microRNA-122 in primates with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Science 2010;327:198e201.