Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
Microstimulation of auditory nerve for estimating cochlear place of single ¢bers in a deaf ear C. van den Honert a *, C.C. Finley a , S. Xue ;
a
b
Center for Auditory Prosthesis Research, Research Triangle Institute, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27009, USA
b
Department of Physics, Cook Physical Science Building, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Received 30 November 1996; revised 30 May 1997; accepted 25 July 1997
Abstract
Multielectrode cochlear prostheses seek to approximate the cochlea's normal frequency-place mapping through spatial segregation of stimulus currents. Various electrode configurations have been employed to achieve such segregation. Direct measurements of stimulation regions among single auditory nerve (AN) fibers has been possible only when normal hearing is preserved, such that each fiber's cochlear place can be inferred from its tuning curve. This precludes measurements in deafened ears, or ears compromised by implantation of the electrodes. Data presented here demonstrate that the cochlear place of an AN fiber can be estimated without acoustic sensitivity, using electrical microstimulation through a recording pipette in the AN bundle. The procedure exploits cochleotopic projection to isofrequency laminae within the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC). Microstimulation excites a small group of fibers neighboring the recorded fiber, generating centrally propagated volleys along a narrow frequencyspecific pathway. Evoked potential recordings at varying depths are made to identify the ICC lamina where the response to AN microstimulation is greatest. Preliminary data are also presented for an alternative method of identifying the lamina using a frequency domain measure of binaural interactions within the IC. Keywords :
tuning
Cochlear implant; Single unit; Cochlear place; Characteristic frequency; Tuning curve; Intermodulation; Spatial
1. Introduction
Multielectrode cochlear prostheses use electrical stimulation of auditory nerve (AN) ¢bers through arrays of electrodes to provide sound sensations to the profoundly deaf. A variety of electrode geometries have been developed with the aim of recreating the normal tonotopy of auditory nerve responses using multiple stimulation sites. This basic strategy is predicated upon the idea that excitation of nerve ¢bers innervating di¡erent cochlear locations can be independently controlled by spatial segregation of stimulating currents. Although this fundamental principle is well established, many questions remain about how much
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 (919) 541-5822; Fax: +1 (919) 541-6221.
spatial segregation of stimulating currents is necessary and how it can be best achieved and utilized. Historically it has been considered desirable to maximize spatial resolution by producing narrow, non-overlapping regions of excitation within tonotopically discrete groups of auditory nerve ¢bers. Various electrode con¢gurations have been considered to achieve this objective, including individual monopoles in close proximity to the ¢bers (Simmons, 1966 ; Simmons et al., 1979), intrascalar monopoles (Eddington et al., 1978 ; Chouard and MacLeod, 1976 ; House and Urban, 1973), extracochlear monopoles (Banfai et al., 1985), intrascalar dipoles with various orientations (Merzenich et al., 1979 ; Hochmair-Desoyer and Hochmair, 1980 ; Black et al., 1981; Byers et al., 1987), and multipolar arrays employing ¢eld focusing (Van Compernolle, 1985; Rodenhiser and Spelman, 1995). However, psychophysical data suggest that even relatively broad overlapping re-
0378-5955 / 97 / $17.00 ß 1997 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved PII S 0 3 7 8 - 5 9 5 5 ( 9 7 ) 0 0 1 3 2 - 9
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
141
gions of excitation are discriminable when stimulated
estimate of place would be of great value, even if it
non-simultaneously
et
provided only relative or imprecise values. The ability
has been
to identify even approximate locations of recorded ¢-
al.,
1978).
achieved sites,
(Shannon,
And good speech
with
either
systems
that
stimulate
simultaneously
non-simultaneously
1983a,b ;
(Tyler
(Wilson
Eddington
understanding
et
al.,
as
et
few
al.,
1991 ;
as
four
1995),
Dorman
bers would signi¢cantly improve our ability to assess
or
the
spatial
et
the
cochlea.
patterning The
of
electrical
stimulation
studies
reported
here
within
represent
the
development of a method which provides more than
al., 1996) in order to reduce channel interactions. Unfortunately, relatively few data are available re-
adequate
resolution
and
accuracy
for
this
purpose.
garding the spatial patterns of auditory nerve excitation
The method provides an estimate of absolute cochlear
actually produced by various electrode con¢gurations.
place if hearing is preserved in the non-experimental
Merzenich and White (1977) estimated cochlear excita-
ear, or relative place in a bilaterally deafened animal.
tion regions by recording from binaural neurons in the
Preliminary data are also presented for an alternative
central
method which has potential for signi¢cantly greater res-
nucleus
of
stimulating
the
electrodes.
They
cat
inferior
contralateral plotted
colliculus
cochlea
electrical
(ICC)
with
while
intrascalar
threshold
for
olution and immunity from electrical artifact.
ICC
units as a function of best frequency (measured with tones
to
the
normal
ipsilateral
ear),
and
concluded
2. Methods
that radial bipolar electrodes produced greater spatial selectivity in the cochlea than monopoles. Snyder et al.
2.1. Overview of microstimulation for place estimation
(1990) have made similar measures in bilaterally deafened animals using ICC depth as an analog of the fre-
The approach presented here depends upon two ba-
quency axis. van den Honert and Stypulkowski (1987)
sic premises. The ¢rst premise is that after recording
constructed similar plots of electrical threshold vs. char-
from a single AN ¢ber, a weak electrical current can
acteristic frequency (CF) measured from ¢bers of the
be applied through
auditory nerve itself. Their preparation preserved hear-
excite a relatively small population of neighboring ¢-
ing in the implanted ear such that cochlear place could
bers. The intent is to stimulate a su¤ciently small re-
be
gion in the vicinity of the recorded ¢ber that most of
inferred
from
traditional
acoustic
tuning
curves.
order
dipoles, and the greatest selectivity with radial dipoles.
quency region. This depends upon the tonotopic organ-
Their approach su¡ers three signi¢cant disadvantages
ization of the auditory nerve bundle. Although the fre-
because it requires normal hearing in the experimental
quency
ear :
of
boundary is less systematic than within the cochlea (Ar-
electrical stimuli (low repetition rate pulses) for which
nesen and Osen, 1978), results presented below indicate
electrophonically elicited spikes (Moxon, 1965) can be
that su¤cient tonotopy is preserved to make this objec-
unambiguously excluded ; (2) it cannot be used in deaf-
tive practical. The stimulated region might also span a
ened preparations (acute or chronic) ; and (3) it cannot
fascicular boundary in the spirally organized bundle,
be used when implantation of an intracochlear electrode
activating two ¢ber groups from widely disparate coch-
array
basilar membrane tuning.
lear locations. The consequences of this possible com-
Hartmann and Klinke (1990) adopted the converse ap-
plication are discussed below. It should be noted that
proach of measuring responses from one neuron while
the intimate contact required for recording from a ¢ber
can
be
used
only
compromises normal
with
a
limited
class
organization
not
of
AN
near
its
the
small
fre-
intracranial
need
long as the microelectrode is not moved it will remain
preferentially
within
particular
electrode
(or
pair),
but
the
same
during
single
method it is possible to identify neurons which respond a
maintained
the
a
varying the location of the electrical stimulus. With this
to
be
representing
approximately
to
same
it
from
in
the
place,
arise
pipette
poles, relatively selective stimulation with longitudinal
cochlear
¢bers
recording
They found very broad stimulation with basal mono-
(1)
responding
the
tonotopic
microstimulation.
region
of
the
nerve
As
bun-
their location remains unknown. Thus the spatial locus
dle even after contact with that particular ¢ber is lost.
of excitation for any particular electrode and stimulus
Thus the procedure can be carried out
current cannot be determined.
has been studied physiologically and contact has been
Signi¢cant progress in measurement of spatial excitation patterns with electrical stimulation of the cochlea
after
the ¢ber
lost. The second basic premise is that cochleotopic projec-
requires a means of determining the cochlear location
tion
of recorded neurons from an acoustically unresponsive
pathways at the inferior colliculus (IC) can be exploited
and
ear. The lack of a method for estimating cochlear place
to infer the tonotopic `place' of the volleys elicited on
of neurons in deaf ear remains the biggest single im-
the AN. Anatomic (Oliver and Morest, 1984 ; Adams,
pediment
studies
of
the
1979 ;
comparison
to
the
(Rose et
`blind' recordings which have been used to date,
any
to
electrically
progress
stimulated
in
physiological
cochlea.
In
binaural
Oliver, al.,
convergence
1984, 1963 ;
1987)
and
of
frequency
physiological
Merzenich and Reid,
speci¢c
studies
1974)
have
shown that the ICC is topographically highly organized
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
142
into a series of isofrequency laminae which receive bin-
binaural interactions within the ICC. Electrical activity
aural frequency-speci¢c inputs. Provided that the mi-
in the IC is measured with a single macroelectrode dur-
crostimulation of AN is tonotopically discrete, the eli-
ing AN microstimulation. Narrowband acoustic search
cited volleys will propagate through frequency-speci¢c
stimuli with various center frequencies are presented to
pathways of the brainstem to produce maximum input
the opposite normal ear. When volleys from the normal
to the ICC within the isofrequency lamina correspond-
ear impinge upon the same lamina receiving the electri-
ing to the CF of the stimulated AN ¢bers.
cally elicited volleys, some in£uence on the evoked elec-
Assuming approximate determined
that CF
by
these of
two
the
premises
recorded
identifying
the
are
AN
best
the
trical activity is expected. Best frequency of that lamina
can
be
may be inferred from the center frequency of the search
of
the
stimulus which most strongly in£uences the evoked ac-
valid,
¢ber
frequency
methods
tivity. The in£uence of the acoustic search stimulus is
for doing so are described below. Both utilize acous-
measured in the frequency domain using spectral anal-
tic
ysis
ICC
lamina
stimuli
receiving
the
presented to
the
volleys.
normal,
Two
opposite ear,
to
of
identify the best frequency of the ICC lamina. Each
detects
method
presents
vantages
in
particular
determining
the
of
ICC
gross
potential of
two
signal. periodic
The
analysis
signals
con-
and
disad-
verging within the ICC from opposite ears. This ap-
activity
within
proach is similar to a method used to measure binoc-
advantages locus
the
intermodulation
ular
ICC.
interactions
in
the
visual
system
(Regan
and
Regan, 1989).
2.2. Method 1: evoked potential vs. ICC depth
Each ear is stimulated to produce periodic volleys to ICC along a narrow frequency pathway. The stimulus
In this method the ICC lamina receiving volleys from
to the experimental ear repeats at repetition rate
fe
and
the experimental ear is identi¢ed by a straightforward
the search stimulus to the other ear repeats at a di¡er-
`polling'
ent rate
procedure.
Brief
current
pulses
are
applied
fs .
The steady state gross potential recorded at
through the pipette within the AN, and the resulting
the ICC includes responses to both periodic inputs. The
evoked potential
a microelec-
spectral consequences of binaural interaction are most
trode at various depths along a track through the con-
easily appreciated by ¢rst considering the case where
tralateral ICC. The depth at which the EP is greatest is
there is no interaction, i.e. when volleys from the two
presumed to represent the lamina whose best frequency
ears impinge upon two
matches the CF of the excited AN ¢bers. The lamina's
within ICC. In the steady state, activity from the ¢rst
best frequency is then identi¢ed by presenting acoustic
lamina generates a periodic potential with period
(EP)
is
measured with
di¡erent
isofrequency laminae
Te = 1/
tones to the other ear. This method has some limita-
fe .
tions. First, if the laminae are polled by driving a single
with energy only at
recording electrode through various depths, then a new
other lamina generates a second periodic potential with
Because this signal is periodic, it has a line spectrum
Ts = 1/fs
fe
and its harmonics. Similarly the
fs
track through ICC is needed for each contacted AN
period
¢ber. In general this would not be practical if a large
and its harmonics. The aggregate potential recorded by
population of ¢bers is to be studied. However, we an-
a macroelectrode is the superposition of these two sig-
ticipate that this di¤culty can be addressed by using a
nals. Therefore its spectrum is the sum of the two orig-
whose spectrum has energy only at
¢xed multicontact array of recording microelectrodes
inal spectra, and will have energy only at
placed across the frequency axis of IC (see Section 4).
their harmonics.
Second, resolution of the place estimate is limited by the
spacing
between
recording
sites,
which
in
turn
would be ¢xed by the density of contacts in a multi-
fe
and
fs
and
In the case where volleys from the two ears converge upon the
same
isofrequency lamina within ICC, binau-
ral neurons within the lamina are in£uenced by inputs
fe
fs
contact recording array. Finally, the method depends
from both ears. We assume that
upon identi¢cation and quanti¢cation of a time domain
chosen to be inharmonic such that the least-common-
response (the EP) which is contaminated by electrical
multiple of their periods
stimulus
such
the master period. We further assume that the binaural
quanti¢cation can be problematic because the magni-
neurons are not perfectly linear (i.e. their outputs are
tude
can
not the simple summation or subtraction of their scaled
vary across preparations and recording sites. Automa-
inputs), which is inherently true of synaptic processes.
tion of this process is likely to be di¤cult. Method 2
The steady state response of the binaural neurons re-
avoids each of these limitations.
sponding to both inputs must be periodic at
and
artifact.
Even
morphology
with
of
visual
both
EP
inspection
and
artifact
TM
and
have been
is ¢nite. We refer to
TM
as
TM =1/fM .
Then the spectrum of that response will have energy
2.3. Method 2: binaural interactions in ICC Rather
than
polling
individual
laminae,
fM and its harmonics. Those harmonics include fs and their harmonics, but they also include intermodulation (IM) distortion products nfe þ mfs pro-
only at
fe
method
2
seeks to identify the responding lamina by measuring
and
duced by nonlinear
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
combination of the two periodic
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
143
1
inputs at the binaural neurons . The aggregate poten-
was titrated by skin pinch and maintained by periodic
tial recorded by a macroelectrode is the summation of
subcutaneous
¢elds
tion.
from
both
binaural
and
monaural
neurons,
ECG
injection
was
of
lactated
monitored
Ringer's
continuously.
solu-
The
animal
and its spectrum will include distortion products in ad-
was mounted in a stereotaxic frame using hollow ear
dition to harmonics of
bars.
fe
and
fs .
Thus convergence of
The
left
cerebellum
binaural inputs can be detected by examination of the
craniotomy.
Cerebellum
ICC gross potential spectrum for IM distortion prod-
and
nucleus
was
then
ucts.
lear
nucleus
was
gently
was
exposed
overlying gently
the
by
aspirated.
displaced
occipital
auditory The
medially
nerve coch-
by
in-
When an electrical stimulus is used to elicit volleys
sertion of small pieces of cotton between the nucleus
from the experimental ear, the gross potential recorded
and the skull to enhance the exposure of the auditory
by the macroelectrode represents the sum of both phys-
nerve.
iological signals described above and electrical stimulus
Stimulus waveforms were synthesized digitally with
artifact. A powerful advantage of this method is that in
two 16-bit digital-to-analog converters (DACs) clocked
the frequency domain the electrical stimulus artifact is
by
entirely segregated from the physiological signals of interest. This is true because the electrical stimulus artifact is perfectly periodic at fe and contributes energy to the gross potential spectrum only at fe and its harmon-
separate
Acoustic
4.5-digit
stimuli
phase-locked-loop
were generated with
synthesizers.
two Sennheiser
HD540 dynamic phones coupled to the hollow stereotaxic ear bars (Sokolich, 1981). A separate acoustic calibration was performed for each ear in each preparation
at
using a calibrated microphone positioned within 2 mm
these frequencies as well, they are not the components
of the tympanic membrane through a tube at the tip of
of interest. The spectral components of interest re£ect-
the ear bar. Electrical stimuli were generated by con-
ing binaural convergence are those distortion products
necting the output from one of the DACs to a custom,
at
optically isolated high-voltage stimulator.
ics.
Although
nfe þ mfs
there
are
physiological
components
which are distinct from the harmonics of
fe .
Single
These components can be readily resolved by spectral
unit
analysis even if they are 70 dB or more below the arti-
were
made
fact components.
(20^25 M
6
recordings
with
3
M
from
KCl
auditory
¢lled
glass
nerve
¢bers
micropipettes
). Tuning curves for AN ¢bers were meas-
These experiments were undertaken to evaluate the
ured with tone pips according to the paradigm of Liber-
two proposed methods. This required that actual CF of
man (1978). The same micropipette was used alternately
AN ¢bers be measured with standard acoustic tuning
to
curves for comparison with estimated CFs. Therefore
liver
all animals had normal hearing in both ears. The ani-
bundle. After a tuning curve was measured the wire
mals were not deafened, and were not implanted with
from the shank of the pipette was disconnected from
intracochlear electrodes. Only one of the two methods
the recording preampli¢er and connected instead to the
was studied in each preparation because they employed
output of the optically isolated constant-voltage stimu-
di¡erent IC recording electrodes. Care and use of these
lator. The recording site was stimulated with 0.5 ms
animals were approved by the Duke University Institu-
biphasic sinusoidal voltage pulses (1 cycle of a 2 kHz
tional Animal Care and Use Committee.
sine) to the shank of the pipette. Repetition rate varied
record single ¢ber action microstimulation at the
potentials and then to desame site within the nerve
between 19 Hz and 97 Hz. A subcutaneous needle in
2.4. Surgical preparation
one forelimb serve as a return electrode. The amplitude of the voltage pulse varied between 20 V and 80 V peak,
Experiments were conducted in 14 adult cats prean-
which produced
6
peak
currents
of
1^4
WA
through
a
esthetized by i.m. injection of ketamine hydrochloride
typical 20 M
(30 mg/kg) and acepromazine (1.7 mg/kg). Surgical level
pipette was a regulated voltage, the high series resist-
anesthesia was maintained with i.v. doses of diallyl-bar-
ance
bituric acid, urethane and monoethyl urea (20, 40, and
constant current to the tissue. In several preparations
40 mg respectively per bolus). A tracheal cannula was
the
placed through a tracheotomy. Atropine sulfate (0.05
instrumentation ampli¢er which measured the voltage
mg/kg i.m.) and dexamethasone (1.0 mg/kg i.v.) were
drop across a 100 k
administered at 12-h intervals to reduce secretions and
return electrode. Current waveforms showed no £uctu-
edema. Core temperature was maintained between 37
ations during stimulation with 80 V pulses at 97 Hz.
and 39³C with a warm-water heating pad. Hydration
Pipette impedances and noise levels measured with the
of
the
actual
pipette. Although the stimulus to the
pipette e¡ectively
current
waveform
6
resulted
was
in
delivery
monitored
with
of
an
resistor placed in series with the
recording ampli¢er were unchanged even after lengthy 1
In fact it can be shown that every harmonic of
in¢nite where
n
set and
of
m
intermodulation
frequencies
of
fM
the
sessions of such stimulation, and subsequent recordings represents an
form
nfe þ mfs
are nonzero integers. Conversely, every such IM fre-
quency can also be shown to be a harmonic of
fM .
from other AN ¢bers were normal in all respects. Thus there was no evidence that stimulation altered the properties of the pipette in any way.
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
144
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
2.5. Method 1: evoked potential vs. ICC depth
During microstimulation of the AN EPs were recorded at various depths within the contralateral ICC using a stereotaxically positioned tungsten microelectrode (1^4 M6). The microelectrode was driven along a track in the sagittal plane 20^30³ from the vertical (dorso-rostral to ventro-caudal). The track was calibrated to enter ICC at its rostro-dorsal boundary. EPs were recorded at intervals of 0.1^0.5 mm by averaging responses to 200^500 pulses at each depth. At each depth best collicular frequency (BCF) was determined from single or multi unit tuning curves. (For clarity we use the term best collicular frequency when referring to cells within the ICC, and reserve the term CF to indicate characteristic frequency of auditory nerve ¢bers.) IC tuning curves were measured with both ipsilateral and contralateral tone pips. EP magnitude was measured from baseline to peak on the leading edge of the positive wave between 2 and 3.5 ms latency. EP magnitude was plotted as a function of BCF, and the peak of this function was compared with the CF measured directly from the AN ¢ber tuning curve. 2.6. Method 2: binaural interactions in ICC
Gross potentials were recorded within the ICC using similar tungsten needles except that 0.5^1.5 mm of insulation was removed from the tip of the needle to form a macroelectrode. The electrode tip was either positioned immediately rostro-dorsal to the boundary of ICC, or driven into ICC (in most cases to a depth which maximized the EP elicited by 100 Ws long, 80 dB peak SPL rarefaction clicks). The ampli¢ed gross potential was lowpass ¢ltered at 2 kHz and connected to a spectrum analyzer. In most experiments the signal was also digitized and averaged for subsequent o¡-line analysis. Current records of the ¢ltered IC potential were also collected using a separate computer. The search stimulus presented to the non-experimental ear was a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) tone. Its carrier frequency Cs was varied between 200 Hz and 30 kHz in order to activate di¡erent tonotopic pathways. Periodicity was established by 100% modulation at frequency fs which was ¢xed at 101.875 Hz. Carrier intensity was varied but was generally limited to 70 dB SPL in order to limit spread along the basilar membrane and consequent broadening of the activated pathway. Experiments were ¢rst undertaken to test the basic methodology using a second SAM tone (rather than microstimulation) presented to the experimental ear to elicit periodic volleys in the AN. This second carrier at frequency Ce was modulated at ¢xed fre-
quency fe =96.875 Hz. The modulation frequencies fe and fs were selected to be near 100 Hz, inharmonic to one another, and not multiples of the 60 Hz power line frequency. In addition, these two frequencies produce IM products which fall exactly at the analysis frequencies of the spectrum analyzer which was used in initial experiments to measure the intermodulation energy. Intermodulation components nfe þ mfs in the spectrum of the IC gross potential were measured as carrier frequencies Cs and Ce were varied. Carrier tone frequencies Cs and Ce were selected to produce an integer number of carrier cycles within one period of their respective modulators. In cases where it was desired to deliver bilateral SAM tones with equal carrier frequencies the closest integer multiples of the modulators were used. For example, if matching bilateral 5 kHz carriers were desired the actual carrier frequencies used were Ce = 52fe = 5.037500 kHz and Cs = 49fs = 4.991875 kHz. Although their frequencies are not identical, such approximately equivalent carrier pairs are referred to below as `matched carriers', and the term `near' is used to identify the corresponding target frequency. Carrier intensities are speci¢ed in dB SPL RMS at modulation maxima. In two preparations the experimental ear received microstimulation of AN through the recording pipette to generate the periodic volleys. In initial experiments the spectrum of the IC gross potential was measured with the spectrum analyzer. Spectra were stored on disk for subsequent o¡-line analysis. In a few cases the frequency zoom capability of the analyzer was utilized to lower the noise £oor around speci¢c distortion products (generally fe + fs). In this mode a longer time record was collected resulting in more closely spaced analysis lines, each with a smaller noise component. Because of the narrowed frequency window, however, fewer distortion products were available for analysis. In later experiments this limitation was removed by storing time records of the IC gross potential and computing spectra o¡ line using custom analysis software. Time records were collected and stored in two forms, termed `short' and `long'. In the short form the IC potential was sampled at 10.24 kHz, and 10 cycles of the master period TM were averaged (16 s total). Time zero represented the common zero crossing of both modulators fe and fs . Spectra of the short form records were computed by discrete Fourier transform. The long form consisted of a raw 16 s epoch sampled by a separate computer with 12-bit resolution at a 10 kHz rate (160 000 samples total) beginning at an arbitrary point within the master period. Spectra of long form records were computed by Chirp-z
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
145
Fig. 1. EP data collected at successive depths along one track through ICC with microstimulation of AN. CF at stimulus site was 9.3 kHz.
3
Stimulus was 1 cycle of a 2 kHz sine wave applied to the pipette. a : EP magnitude (leading edge baseline
peak) vs. depth. Depth 0 represents
the dorso-caudal boundary of ICC 2.5 mm posterior, 4.5 mm dorsal, and 4.5 mm lateral to stereotaxic zero. Legend indicates stimulus intensity in peak volts. b : BCF vs. depth. Dashed curve represents ¢tted function
y = axb .
Dotted line shows CF of AN ¢ber contacted at the stimulus
site. c : Magnitude replotted against BCF at corresponding depths. Inset shows tuning curve measured from the AN ¢ber prior to microstimulation. d : EP waveforms for 70 V data of panels a and c.
transform (Rabiner and Gold, 1975) after application
3. Results
of a hanning window. Both short and long form records were
collected
concurrently
over
approximately
the
3.1. Method 1: evoked potential vs. ICC depth
same 16 s interval, although they did not have identical starting points. Data collection began approximately 1 s
Evoked potential data were collected from 12 tracks
after onset of the stimuli. Excellent correspondence was
through ICC in six animals. Along each track EPs were
observed between corresponding long and short form
recorded at depth intervals ranging from 0.1 to 0.5 mm.
spectra.
At each depth an averaged EP was recorded with mi-
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
146
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
Fig. 2. EP data from a single track through ICC with microstimulation of AN. CF at stimulus site 710 Hz. Format of panels a^c as in Fig. 1. d : EP magnitude replotted against interpolated BCF derived from the ¢tted curve (dashed line) of panel b.
crostimulation to the AN at each of several pulse in-
depth data are replotted against BCF on the abscissa.
tensities ranging from 10 V to 80 V peak. Data from a
For comparison a tuning curve measured from an AN
representative track are shown in Fig. 1. Panel 1d
¢ber at the site of microstimulation is inset in panel 1c.
shows the sequence of evoked potentials recorded at
BCFs at the maxima slightly overestimate CF of the
successive depths within the IC using a 70 V stimulus
AN ¢ber, but there is generally a good correspondence.
to the pipette. The magnitudes of these EPs and others
The relatively smooth and monotonic BCF vs. depth
measured with lower stimulus intensities are plotted
relationship of Fig. 1b is representative of most data
against relative depth in panel 1a. All of the curves
from this study. However, in four cases the BCF/depth
exhibit a maximum in the vicinity of 3.3 mm relative
curves exhibited moderate discontinuities or non-mon-
depth. BCFs at corresponding depths along the same
otonicity at low frequencies. These e¡ects were an arti-
track are shown in panel 1b. In panel 1c the EP vs.
factual result of the de¢nition of BCF adopted here,
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
147
Fig. 3. EP data from a single track through ICC with microstimulation of AN. CF at stimulus site 3.7 kHz.
viz. the absolute minimum of the multiunit tuning
the AN ¢ber at the site of microstimulation corre-
curve. Although this de¢nition is simple and conven-
sponded to the single maximum observed at lower in-
ient, it can introduce variability at low frequencies
tensities. It was hypothesized that the divergence into a
where the curves are broadly tuned. A relatively noisy
bimodal curve at high intensities re£ected spread of the
tuning curve may demonstrate several local minima
microstimulation into an adjacent AN fascicle contain-
within a broadly tuned tip, and the deepest of those
ing ¢bers with lower CFs.
de¢nes the BCF. In order to reduce the e¡ects of
Fig. 4 compares actual and estimated CFs for all
such variability, BCF vs. depth data from each track were ¢tted with a power function of the form
y = axb
as
illustrated in panel 1b. These ¢ts provided smooth monotonic functions which could be used to interpolate an estimated BCF for each depth. EP data were plotted against both raw BCFs and interpolated BCFs. Fig. 2 illustrates such a comparison. In this case microstimulation in the AN was delivered at the site of a low frequency ¢ber with a CF of 710 Hz. As in Fig. 1, the EP vs. depth data demonstrate a well de¢ned maximum, in this case near 0.5 mm. But the non-monotonicities
introduced
by
the
transformation
from
depth to BCF (panel 2b) result in the relatively noisy EP vs. BCF plot (panel 2c). The EP data are replotted in panel 2d against interpolated BCF computed from the best ¢t function of Fig. 2b. As in Fig. 1 there is a good correspondence between BCF at the maxima and the CF of the ¢ber. For 11 of 12 tracks the EP vs. depth data demonstrated an unambiguous maximum which was consistent across intensities. Data from the remaining track are shown in Fig. 3. EP magnitude exhibited a single maximum at 1 mm relative depth for stimulus intensities up to 40 V (panel 3a). As the intensity was further increased to 80 V two separate maxima in the EP vs. depth curve emerged. As shown in panel 3b, the CF of
Fig. 4. Estimated vs. measured CF of AN ¢bers. Each symbol represents one AN ¢ber and one track through ICC. Solid represents perfect estimation (not a regression line).
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
x=y
line
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
148
Fig. 5. Excerpts of magnitude spectra computed from short form records of ICC potential with unilateral and bilateral SAM tones near 10 kHz. Both carrier intensities 70 dB SPL. Solid line indicates ipsilateral to IC. Carrier frequency
Ce = 103fe = 9.978125
3
150 dB re : 1 V rms. Carrier frequency
Cs = 98fs = 9.98375
kHz presented to ear
kHz presented to contralateral ear. Solid diamonds indicate harmonics of the 60 Hz
power line frequency.
studied
AN
¢bers.
Estimates
were
made
from
both
quency (198.75 Hz) also appeared. In this case an addi-
fe +fs
measured BCF and interpolated BCF at the each site
tional IM product at 2
of maximum EP. For the ¢ber shown in Fig. 3, CF was
fe + fs
estimated from the 40 V EP data because it was the
entation of matched carriers between 500 Hz and 20
was observed as well. The
product was similarly observed with bilateral pres-
kHz. In general
fe +fs
For all other tracks the highest intensity studied was
and
IM
employed (60^80 V). Estimates from measured BCFs
animals
show
cases of bilateral stimulation with matched carriers.
highest
intensity
slightly
r2 = 0.94) 2 (r = 0.90). (
which
higher
than
produced
a
correlation
those
from
single
with
maximum.
actual
interpolated
CF
BCFs
prominent
fe +fs
was the most reliably measurable product
in
the
spectrum.
Across
was measurable in the great majority of
Fig. 6 illustrates the e¡ect of stimulus intensity on the magnitude of the
fe +fs
M fe + f s M )
distortion product (
generated by bilateral SAM tones with matched car-
3.2. Method 2: binaural interactions in ICC
riers. Each panel presents data collected at one of ¢ve di¡erent depths along two di¡erent tracks within ICC.
Measures of binaural interaction were made in eight
In each panel
Mfe +fs M
is plotted against stimulus inten-
fe +fs
animals. Most experiments reported here used bilateral
sity for various carrier frequencies. In general the
acoustic stimuli in order to assess the feasibility of de-
product was resolved above the noise £oor with inten-
tecting binaural interaction with spectral analysis. Un-
sities above 50 or 60 dB SPL. Its magnitude rose with
less otherwise speci¢ed, the stimulus to the experimental
increasing intensity, tending to plateau at higher inten-
ear was a SAM tone modulated at
fe = 96.875
Hz, and
the search stimulus to the contralateral ear was a SAM
fs = 101.875
tone modulated at
Hz. Fig. 5 shows exem-
sities. The magnitude of frequency.
Four
of
the
fe +fs ¢ve
also varied with carrier
sites
exhibited
particular
sensitivity to one of the tested carrier frequencies. At
fe +fs
plary magnitude spectra computed from short form re-
these `preferred' frequencies the
cords measured with unilateral and bilateral SAM tones
above the noise £oor at intensities as low as 10^30 dB
with carriers near 10 kHz. Both stimuli were generated
SPL. As a consequence of the saturating tendency in
in
the curves, the spread in
all
three
produce
cases,
but
unilateral
one
attenuator
stimulation.
As
was
muted
illustrated
in
to the
top two traces unilateral presentation of either stimulus produced prominent spectral components at harmonics of the modulator (
fe
or
fs ).
With bilateral stimulation a
prominent component at the
fe +fs
IM distortion fre-
Mfe +fs M
product remained
across frequencies gen-
erally decreased as intensity increased. The rationale for inferring the locus of activity in the experimental that
the
ear
binaural
from
ICC
gross
interaction
when the binaural inputs are
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
in
potentials
the
ICC
is
assumes greatest
tonotopically coincident,
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154 maximum in
Mfe +fs M
149
Cs
was observed for
Ce .
at or near
The maxima became broader as intensity was increased, and in two cases (Fig. 7a,b) a second maximum near
Cs = 1.5 kHz emerged at high intensities. In one of those cases
(Fig.
7a)
this
second
`spurious'
maximum
ex-
ceeded the original matched carrier maximum when intensity was raised to 60 and 70 dB SPL. Nevertheless, in
Ce
each of these cases a good estimate of
(the frequency
region of activity in the experimental ear) could be inferred from the behavior of the
Mfe +fs M
Cs
vs.
curves.
For brevity we will adopt the abbreviation IMTC (for `intermodulation
Mfe +fs M
vs.
Cs
tuning
curve')
to
refer
to
plots
of
below.
The data of Fig. 7 argue for the use of low or moderate intensities to preserve selectivity of the measure. However, this presents a practical problem. At any particular ICC recording site, low intensity stimuli generally generated a measurable
fe +fs
component over only
a limited range of preferred matched carrier frequencies (e.g. Fig. 6a^d). The question remains whether, at a single recording site, adequate selectivity can be maintained with higher
intensities needed
to resolve
fe +fs
across a wide range of frequencies. Data addressing this question are mixed. Each panel of Fig. 8 shows IMTCs from one site collected using bilateral intensities of 70 dB SPL. Fig. 8a illustrates a case where two experimental ear carriers almost three octaves
apart
were
readily
distinguished.
IMTCs were measured with ¢xed
Ce
The
two
near 1 kHz and
7 kHz respectively. Although both curves are broad, the maxima are well de¢ned and correspond to
Ce
w
in both
cases. In the case shown in Fig. 8b, IMTCs exhibit well de¢ned maxima corresponding to
Ce
for
Ce
500 Hz,
10 kHz and 20 kHz, but the maximum of the 2 kHz
Ce and that of the 5 kHz Ce . The poorest observed in Fig. 8c. Except for Ce 20
curve is 1.5 octaves below
w
curve is two octaves above correspondence is shown Fig. 6. Intermodulation energy vs. intensity measured with bilateral
kHz the IMTCs are broad with poorly de¢ned maxima
w
Ce . Further, three of these
matched carriers at various frequencies. Each panel represents a dif-
which generally do not fall at
ferent ICC recording site in the same animal. Legend inset in panel
curves
e applies to all panels. Hatched area represents the noise £oor.
`spurious' maximum at 1.5 kHz, similar to that in the
(
Ce
500,
5
kHz
and
10
kHz)
also
exhibit
a
70 dB curve of Fig. 7a. Across all animals, no single site
wC
fe +fs
i.e. the matched carrier case. Thus the should be strongest when progressively frequency.
In
Ce
weaker
as
the
order
to
test
carriers
Ce
product
s and should become
this
are
separated
assumption
Cs
in
demonstrated appropriate IMTC maxima for the entire range of
Ce
Several
values when 70 dB SPL stimuli were used.
observations
suggested
that
high
intensity
Mfe +fs M
1 kHz SAM tones (70 dB SPL) were singularly e¡ective
was systemati-
in generating intermodulation products when compared
cally varied. Fig. 7 shows results measured at each of
to equally intense SAM tones at other carrier frequen-
the four ICC recording sites from Fig. 6 which exhib-
cies. The ¢rst was the phenomenon of `spurious' peaks
ited particular sensitivity to one of the matched carrier
such as those in Fig. 7a,c. These were frequently ob-
was measured with a ¢xed
while
fe +fs is plotted as a function of the search carrier frequency Cs . In each case the experimental ear carrier Ce was ¢xed at the preferred frequency (indicated by the vertical line), and Cs was varpairs. The magnitude of
served in IMTCs with 70 dB SPL carriers, and were
W
consistently
Cs Ce .
located
around
search
frequencies
of
1 kHz regardless of recording site or the value of
In addition, bilateral matched carrier 1 kHz SAM
ied. Carrier intensity was the same for both ears, and
tones at 70 dB consistently elicited a strong response
was varied between 20 and 70 dB SPL. In each case a
with
a
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
distinctive
spectrum
characterized
by
a
rich
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
150
Fig. 7. Intermodulation tuning curves measured at the same four sites illustrated in Fig. 6a^d. Carrier intensities to the two ears were equal. Legend inset in panel d applies to all panels. In each case 6 for which the
structure
of
fe +fs IM
Ce
(indicated by vertical line) was ¢xed at the `preferred' carrier frequency from Fig.
product remained above the noise at 30 dB. Hatched areas represent the noise £oor.
products
and
modulator
harmonics
with a repetition rate of 96.875 Hz. The non-experimen-
fs
clustered at 50 Hz intervals. These features were gener-
tal ear received SAM tones modulated at
ally not observed with other matched carrier frequen-
Prior to microstimulation the pipette was used to record
cies at 70 dB. In addition the
fe +fs
product at 1 kHz
as usual.
a standard tuning curve from a single AN ¢ber. In the
fe +fs
was sometimes 15^20 dB higher than that observed with
¢rst case the
other matched carrier frequencies. One further observa-
the noise £oor. In the second animal the
tion regarding these stimuli is noteworthy. In one ex-
nent
periment a platinum ball recording electrode was placed
quency
on the cortical surface. With 1 kHz matched carriers the
shows the IMTC and corresponding single ¢ber tuning
fe +fs
curve. The peak in the IMTC corresponds well with the
product
was
clearly
resolved
at
the
cortex
for
stimuli of 60 dB SPL or greater, whereas with 5 kHz and 20 kHz carriers up to 80 dB no
fe + fs
was
component was not resolved above
successfully
resolution
of
resolved the
by
fe +fs
increasing
spectrum
analyzer.
compothe
fre-
Fig.
9
tuning curve tip.
component
was ever resolved above the noise £oor. All of the intermodulation measures described above
4. Discussion
were performed with acoustic stimulation of both ears. In two animals periodic microstimulation was used to
4.1. Microstimulation of auditory nerve
excite the auditory nerve through a micropipette. The stimulus was an 80 V-peak 500
Ws/phase
biphasic pulse
Microstimulation
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
of
the
auditory
nerve
through
a
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
151
recording pipette forms the cornerstone of both proposed methods of CF inference. Perhaps the most important result of these experiments is the demonstration that such microstimulation is practical. Two possible di¤culties with such microstimulation were anticipated. The ¢rst was that adequate stimulation might not be achievable through the high impedance of a micropipette. Results from the EP vs. depth measures (e.g. Fig.
Fig. 9. Intermodulation tuning curve measured with microstimulation of AN in the experimental ear. CF at stimulation site 1.26 kHz. Inset shows tuning curve measured from AN ¢ber prior to microstimulation. Stimulus was a biphasic pulse (80 V peak, 500
Ws/
phase) repeated at 96.875 Hz. Hatched area represents the noise £oor.
1) clearly demonstrate that adequate stimulation can be e¡ectively delivered through these recording electrodes. The second anticipated di¤culty was that stimulation adequate to elicit a measurable response in the ICC might excite a substantial population of ¢bers whose CFs were dissimilar to that of the recorded ¢ber. This might occur if (1) the stimulus were to spread across a fascicular boundary ; or (2) the CFs of the recorded ¢ber were dissimilar to those of its neighbors. With respect to the former, the curves of Fig. 3 do suggest that cross-fascicular spread may occur at high intensities. But the phenomenon is recognizable by the transition from a narrow unimodal pro¢le to a broad bimodal one at high intensity. The latter issue hinges on the local homogeneity of CF in comparison to the size of the stimulated region of the AN. We are not aware of any detailed maps in the literature which describe the microscopic details of tonotopy within the cross-section of cat AN at the intracranial boundary. In our experience it is not uncommon to observe a one octave change in CF with a 25^50
Wm
advance of the pipette.
On the other hand, contact with one ¢ber is occasionally maintained over a comparable distance and then lost precipitously, which suggests that the tip of the pipette may not always advance smoothly through the tissue. Observed CF discontinuities may therefore be at least partially due to tissue distortion and relaxation as the pipette is advanced, rather than local variability of Fig. 8. Intermodulation tuning curves at various
Ce
frequencies with
bilateral 70 dB carriers. Each panel represents a di¡erent ICC recording site. Legend inset in panel a applies to all panels. Hatched area represents the noise £oor.
CF. The size of the microstimulation region is also dif¢cult to estimate with con¢dence. Notwithstanding these quantitative questions, the excellent correlation demonstrated in Fig. 4 suggests that
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
152
local tonotopy is su¤cient to permit a reasonably ac-
curve could likely be interpolated and/or extrapolated
curate inference of CF. In this context it is worth reit-
from even a handful of measured points. Such extra-
erating that even an imperfect estimate of cochlear lo-
polation might be needed for very high BCF sites where
cation would permit, for the ¢rst time, study of spatial
sensitivity to ipsilateral tones is lower (Schreiner and
selectivity of intracochlear electrode geometries in deaf
Langner, 1988). Even in a bilaterally deafened prepara-
ears. Such studies must generally be carried out in large
tion, where acoustic responses cannot be measured at
¢ber populations where an occasional estimation error
all, IC depth alone can still be used to determine
(even much larger than those observed here) would in-
tive
troduce outliers in the population data, but would not
et al. (1990) used IC depth in this way as an analog of
preclude
the frequency axis to measure spatial tuning of IC re-
nally,
reasonable
the
spatial
data
interpretation
presented
speci¢city
of
here
of
also
results.
demonstrate
microstimulation
after
the
is
Fithat
adequate
rela-
cochlear place among recorded AN ¢bers. Snyder
sponses to intracochlear stimulation.
to
A clear limitation of the method as implemented in
contact with a ¢ber has been
these experiments is the need to perform a new pene-
lost. This is particularly important, because it means
tration of IC for every CF estimate. Each penetration is
that valuable recording time need not be devoted to
time consuming and unavoidably imparts some damage
the CF estimation procedure.
to the IC. A more practical implementation would uti-
estimate CF even
One caveat is in order regarding frequency-speci¢c microstimulation.
In
a
chronically
deafened
auditory
lize a ¢xed linear array of recording electrodes with 100
Wm
spacing (Hetke et al., 1992). The array could be
system, central reorganization may broaden or distort
driven into the IC to span the tonotopic axis of the
cochleotopic projections. In this case binaural inputs to
ICC. Since the recording sites would be ¢xed, BCFs
an
similar
could be measured (or interpolated) just once for each
cochlear places in both ears (Snyder et al., 1990). In a
electrode at the outset of the experiment. With appro-
unilaterally deafened animal reorganization on one side
priate
might lead to an error in estimating the physical coch-
could be recorded simultaneously from all electrodes,
lear place of the stimulation presuming a normal fre-
such that data collection for each CF estimate would
quency map. Further experiments are needed to deter-
require only tens of seconds.
IC
mine
lamina
the
may
e¡ects
of
not
necessarily
chronic
represent
deafening
on
the
EP
multichannel
recording
instrumentation,
EPs
vs.
depth pro¢les. In any case this is not an issue in acutely
4.3. Method 2: binaural interactions in ICC
deafened preparations which can be pro¢tably used to study a variety of basic issues regarding spatial selectiv-
Method 1 seeks to identify the IC lamina receiving
ity of intracochlear electrode con¢gurations and stimu-
volleys from the experimental ear essentially by polling
lation methods.
the individual laminae. In contrast, method 2 seeks to identify it on the basis of phenomena detectable at a
4.2. Method 1: EP vs. depth
distance, without requiring a separate, spatially discrete measurement from each candidate lamina. Prospects for
It is evident from Fig. 5 that CF of an auditory nerve
success of this method are still uncertain. The data of
¢ber can be estimated well from the EP vs. depth pro¢le
Fig. 7 suggest that the desired information exists within
using microstimulation. Recordings with a spatial reso-
the activity of IC, but it is also clear that at this point
lution
no turnkey method for extracting it is in hand. The
of
100
Wm
(and
sometimes
coarser)
yielded
a
correlation coe¤cient of 0.94 between actual and esti-
objective
mated CF values. Errors might have been smaller in
these experiments was to derive a spatially generalized
some cases if EP data had been available from inter-
aggregate measure of activity within ICC. The fact that
mediate depths (in ¢ve of 12 tracks only 500
reso-
some sites exhibited particular sensitivity to one of the
While ¢ne spatial resolution might
matched carrier frequencies (Fig. 6) suggests that some
lution was used). provide
greater
accuracy,
the
demonstrated
Wm
accuracy
spatial
in
using
speci¢city
relatively
large
remained.
It
might
such
the
BCF
range spanned by the macroelectrode surface included
cochlear electrode arrays.
one
the
test
apparent mm)
was
frequencies. selectivity,
perimental ear need not depend upon single or multi
(4
unit tuning curves. Acoustic BCF could likely be deter-
resulting attenuation of
used
in
mined with good accuracy by maximizing the gross po-
urable.
In a
one
fe +fs
an very
where
that
tial excitation and interaction patterns of existing intra-
of
locations
be
sensitivity
this
at
in
is more than adequate for fruitful investigation of spa-
In practice determination of BCF from the non-ex-
occurred
macroelectrodes
attempt large
preparation.
to
avoid
electrode But
the
made it generally unmeas-
tential evoked by tone pips. In addition, it would prob-
Focusing for the moment on the optimal recording
ably not be essential to measure BCF at every depth,
circumstance where the volleys from the experimental
because BCF vs. depth curves are strongly monotonic
ear are in the electrode's preferred frequency region, it
and reproducible (Merzenich and Reid, 1974). A usable
is evident that 70 dB SPL SAM tones are not optimal
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
153
search stimuli for our purpose. While elevation of in-
the pivotal issue which must be resolved for practical
tensity is e¡ective in strengthening the intermodulation
use of the interaction method is the elimination of spa-
components, this comes at the expense of broadening,
tial selectivity in the recording. The analysis must detect
and sometimes distorting the IMTC. Another disad-
convergent inputs to
vantage of higher intensities is the appearance of spu-
proximately equal sensitivity. Two simple methods for
rious maxima in the IMTC in the vicinity of 1 kHz.
accomplishing this were attempted brie£y in these ex-
This is apparently due to the singular e¡ectiveness of
periments : (1) removal of the recording electrode to a
high level 1 kHz SAM tones in generating intermodu-
distance which is large compared to the dimensions of
lation products. The origin of this phenomenon is un-
ICC (surface of the cortex) ; and (2) increasing the re-
known, but it may well arise from an extracollicular
cording electrode surface to a size comparable to the
source. This would explain why it is equally prominent
dimensions of the ICC (4 mm). Unfortunately both of
at all ICC recording sites. It could also explain the fact
these have the disadvantage of attenuating an already
fe +fs
all
isofrequency laminae with ap-
is detectable even at the cortical surface with
small signal. A better alternative may be to combine
these stimuli but not with other matched carriers. Fur-
signals from an array of smaller electrodes implanted
ther experiments are needed to identify the source of
throughout the ICC, such as the one envisioned above
this phenomenon, and to determine whether electrical
for parallel EP measurements. An aggregate measure of
microstimulation of auditory nerve at the 1 kHz place
intermodulation might be derived by combining infor-
produces a similar e¡ect. From a practical standpoint
mation from all electrodes in the array. With simple
both
of
summation of their signals, corresponding IM products
IMTCs can be avoided by use of search intensities no
from multiple electrodes might interfere destructively if
greater than 50 dB SPL.
they were not all in phase. In that case individual IM
that
the
spurious
maxima
and
the
broadening
The binaural interaction method is empirical. It presumes nothing about the nature of the underlying bin-
products could be computed for each electrode, and their scalar magnitudes summed.
aural processing except that it is nonlinear and achieves a steady state with steady inputs. As such it is subject to
4.4. Conclusion
the limitations of any empirical method. Validation is needed to con¢rm its reliability across experimental
Data presented here demonstrate that the cochlear
conditions which might a¡ect the processing, such as
place of an AN ¢ber can be estimated without acoustic
depth of anesthesia. The optimum stimuli for generat-
responses, using electrical microstimulation through a
ing intermodulation can be determined only by thor-
recording pipette in the AN bundle. Microstimulation
ough exploration of the stimulus space. For these initial
excites a small group of ¢bers neighboring the recorded
studies we chose low frequency sinusoidal modulators
¢ber, generating centrally propagated volleys along a
for three reasons : (1) the resulting narrowband stimuli
frequency-speci¢c pathway. Two methods have been
excite small frequency regions ; (2) they allow search
described for identifying the locus of that pathway in
carrier frequencies down to a few hundred Hz ; and
the ICC.
(3) temporal representation (which is essential to the
Method 1 is simple and proven, and can be useful
method) is good for low rate modulators. A few pre-
even in bilaterally deafened animals. There are no con-
liminary measures with other modulation frequencies
ceptual barriers to its implementation, although adap-
did not show them to have any obvious advantages.
tation to a multielectrode recording array will no doubt
Nevertheless, the ICC is known to have a highly organ-
require some methodological re¢nements. Method 2 re-
ized topographic distribution of best modulation fre-
mains an unproven but intriguing possibility. If the is-
quencies (BMFs). BMFs are organized into concentric
sue of spatial selectivity can be successfully resolved,
contours in each isofrequency lamina, ranging from
method 2 o¡ers very signi¢cant advantages over meth-
400^600 Hz at the center to 100 Hz at the periphery
od 1 in frequency resolution, artifact immunity, and
(Schreiner
modulator
ease of automation. It holds su¤cient promise as a
combinations may be more e¡ective for our purpose.
potentially rapid and accurate tool for CF estimation
And other distortion products or combinations of prod-
to justify continued e¡ort towards its implementation.
ucts may provide a more robust overall measure of
Finally it is worth noting that a combination of the two
and
Langner,
intermodulation than
fe +fs
fe +fs
1988).
Other
alone. Our focus on the
product derived from early experiments where
methods, using the same recording array, may o¡er the advantages of each.
this product seemed to be most robust across conditions, but it is also true that many other products have been observed,
fe +fs
some of which have exceeded
Acknowledgments
on occasion.
Although better search stimuli or intermodulation
Dr. Norman Herzberg provided invaluable insight
metrics may be identi¢ed by further experimentation,
into the number theory underlying the relationships
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
C. van den Honert et al. / Hearing Research 113 (1997) 140^154
154
among modulators and distortion product frequencies. Ms. in
Ramona data
Miller
collection
supported
in
provided
and
part
technical
analysis.
by
NIH
This
Grants
assistance work
was
P01-DC00036
and R55-DC01381. Data were collected at the Hearing Research Laboratory of Duke University Medical Cen-
stimulation of the auditory nerve in the profoundly deaf ; interfacing electrode arrays with the auditory nerve. Acta Otolaryngol. 87, 196^203. Moxon, E.C.,
the
cat's cochlea :
A
MIT, Cambridge, MA. Oliver, D.L., 1984. Dorsal cochlear nucleus projections to the inferior colliculus
ter.
1965. Electrical stimulation of
study of discharge rates of single auditory nerve ¢bers. MS Thesis,
of
the
cat :
A
light
and
electron
the
inferior
microscopic
study.
J. Comp. Neurol. 224, 155^172. Oliver,
D.L.,
1978.
Projections
to
colliculus
from
the
anteroventral cochlear nucleus in the cat : Possible substrates for
References
binaural interaction. J. Comp. Neurol. 264, 24^46. Oliver, D.L., Morest, D.K., 1984. The central nucleus of the inferior
Adams, J.C., 1979. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus.
Arnesen,
A.R., Osen,
K.K.,
1978.
The
cochlear nerve
in
the
cat :
topography, cochleotopy, and ¢ber spectrum. J. Comp. Neurol.
W., 1985. Extracochlear eight-channel electrode system. J. Laryn-
measurements within the human cochlea. IEEE Trans. Biomed.
G.E.,
Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42, 337^342. Rose,
J.E.,
Greenwood,
D.D.,
Merzenich,
M.M.,
Rebscher,
S.J.,
1987.
Method for making an intracochlear electrode array. U.S. Patent
colliculus
of
the
cat.
J.E.,
1963.
I.
Tonotopical
organization,
relation
of
Schreiner, C.E., Langner, G., 1988. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus
report. Laryngoscope 86, 1743^1751.
physiol. 60, 1823^1840.
M.F.,
Smith,
L.M.,
discrimination
and
Smith,
M.,
speech
recognition
Parkin,
J.L., by
1996.
Fre-
patients
who
use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-im-
D.K.,
Dobelle,
W.H.,
Brackmann,
D.E.,
of
the
cat.
II.
Topographic
organization.
J.
Neuro-
Shannon, R.V., 1983a. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11, 157^189. Shannon,
R.V.,
1983b.
Multichannel
electrical
stimulation
of
the
auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. Hear. Res. 12,
plant signal processors. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1174^1184. Eddington,
Hind,
spike-counts to tone intensity, and ¢ring patterns of single ele-
cochlear electrodes for rehabilitation of total deafness : Preliminary
quency
J.M.,
ments. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 294^320.
4,686,765. Chouard, C.H., MacLeod, P., 1976. Implantation of multiple intra-
Dorman,
Goldberg,
Some discharge characteristics of single neurons in the inferior
Eng. BME 28, 721^724. Loeb,
tential analysis. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 16, 168^179. Rodenhiser, K.L., Spelman, F.A., 1995. A method for determining the driving currents for focused stimulation in the cochlea. IEEE
gol. Otol. 99, 549^553. Black, R.C., Clarck, G.M., Patrick, J.F., 1981. Current distribution
C.L.,
Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cli¡s, NJ. Regan, M.P., Regan, D., 1989. Objective investigation of visual function using a nondestructive zoom-FFT technique for evoked po-
178, 661^678. Banfai, P., Hortman, G., Kubik, S., Karczag, A., Lu ë ers, P., Su ë rth,
Byers,
colliculus in the cat. J. Comp. Neurol. 222, 237^264. Rabiner, L.R., Gold, B., 1975. Theory and Application of Digital
J. Comp. Neurol. 183, 519^538.
Mladejovsky,
M.G., Parkin, J.L., 1978. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple intracochlear stimulation in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryn-
1^16. Simmons, F.B., 1966. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. Arch. Otolaryngol. 84, 2^54. Simmons, F.G., Mathews, R.G., Walker, M.G., White, R.L., 1979. A
gol. Suppl. 53, 87, part 2. Hartmann, R., Klinke, R., 1990. Impulse patterns of auditory nerve ¢bers to extra- and intracochlear electrical stimulation. Acta Oto-
functioning multichannel auditory nerve stimulator. Acta Otolaryngol. 87, 170^175. Snyder, R.L., Rebscher, S.J., Cao, K., Leake, P.A., Kelly, K., 1990.
laryngol. 469 (Suppl.), 128^134. 1992.
Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deaf-
Chronic multichannel recording from guinea pig inferior collicu-
ened cat. I : Expansion of central representation. Hear. Res. 50, 7^
Hetke,
J.F.,
Anderson,
D.J.,
Wiler,
J.A.,
Clopton,
B.M.,
lus. Abstr. 15th Midwinter Meeting, Association for Research in
34. Sokolich,
Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, FL. Hochmair-Desoyer, I.J., Hochmair, I.S., 1980. An eight channel scala tympani electrode for auditory prostheses. IEEE Trans. Biomed.
House, W.F., Urban, P.E., 1973. Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlear in man. Ann.
Liberman, M.C., 1978. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a
Closed
sound
delivery
system.
U.S.
Patent
Ineraid
and
Nucleus
implant
patients
after
3.5
years
Van Compernolle, D. (1985) Speech processing strategies for a multicochlear
prosthesis.
Technical Report
G906-7,
Depart-
ment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. van den Honert, C., Stypulkowski, P.S., 1987. Single ¢ber mapping of
low-noise chamber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 442^455. Merzenich, M.M., Reid, M.D., 1974. Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat. Brain Res. 77, 397^415. Merzenich, M.M., White, M.W., 1977. Cochlear Implant. The inter-
spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 29, 195^206. Wilson, B.S., Finley, C.C., Lawson, D.T., Wolford, R.D., Eddington,
face problem. In : Hambrecht, F.T., Reswick, J.B. (Eds.), Func-
D.K., Rabinowitz, W.M., 1991. Better speech recognition
tional Electrical Stimulation. Marcel Dekker, New York.
cochlear implants. Nature 352, 236^238.
Merzenich,
M.M.,
White,
M.,
Vivion,
M.C.,
of
use. Audiology 34, 135^144.
channel
Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 82, 504^517.
1981.
Tyler, R.S., Lowder, M.W., Parkinson, A.J., 1995. Performance of adult
Eng. BME 27, 44^50.
W.G.,
4,251,686.
Leake-Jones,
P.A.,
Walsh, S., 1979. Some considerations of multichannel electrical
HEARES 2887 28-11-97
with