Microstructures and mechanical properties of interface between porcelain and Ni–Cr alloy

Microstructures and mechanical properties of interface between porcelain and Ni–Cr alloy

Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Materials Science and Engineering A journal homepag...

782KB Sizes 0 Downloads 52 Views

Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Materials Science and Engineering A journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/msea

Microstructures and mechanical properties of interface between porcelain and Ni–Cr alloy J. Liu a , X.M. Qiu a , S. Zhu b , D.Q. Sun a,∗ a b

Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China Stomatology Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130041, China

a r t i c l e

i n f o

Article history: Received 31 March 2008 Received in revised form 18 July 2008 Accepted 18 July 2008 Keywords: Ni–Cr alloy Porcelain Interface Microstructure Mechanical properties

a b s t r a c t Microstructures and mechanical properties of interface between porcelain and Ni–Cr alloy have been investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Xray diffraction analyzer (XRD) and electronic universal testing machine. Experimental results show that there exists a reaction layer in the Ni–Cr/porcelain bond interface and the thickness of the reaction layer increases with the increase of firing temperature and firing time. The interdiffusion of atoms occurred during firing, Al, Si, Sn and O diffusing from porcelain material into Ni–Cr alloy, and Ni and Cr diffusing into the porcelain material. The phase composition of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface is complicated and mainly contains SnO2 , AlNi3, SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 compounds. Firing temperature and firing time have obvious effect on the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface relative to the different reaction layer structures. The maximum shear bond strength reached 43.8 MPa at firing temperatures of 990 ◦ C for firing time of 2.5 min. © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction Porcelain fused to metal (PFM) restorations have been widely used in clinical treatment and restoration of teeth because of their excellent characteristics such as natural beauty, obdurability, impact resistance, wear resistance and corrosion resistance, and are welcomed more and more by doctors and sufferers [1–4]. Initially, the alloys used as the substructure of metal/porcelain restorations were high-gold alloys, then low-gold alloys. However, Ni–Cr alloys were introduced into dentistry as a possible replacement for precious alloys due to the sharp increase in cost of gold in 1973. In addition, Ni–Cr alloys also offer the advantage of an increased modulus of elasticity compared with gold, which allows thinner sections of the alloys to be used, and consequently reduces polish of natural teeth during the restoration. At present, Ni–Cr alloys have been widely used for the restoration of teeth in some developing countries because of the economic and other reasons, although doubts remain as to the biocompatibility of Ni–Cr alloys. The success of the PFM restorations acutely depends on the success of the strong bond between porcelain and the metal substructure [5–8]. However, the clinical failure rate of PFM restorations due to fracture and exfoliation of porcelain is 59.1% of the

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 431 85094687; fax: +86 431 85094687. E-mail address: [email protected] (D.Q. Sun). 0921-5093/$ – see front matter © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.029

whole clinical failure. In the current study, a lot of researches done on the PFM restorations had focused on the nature and kinds of the alloy, but reports about the microstructure and composition of the metal/porcelain interface are limited [9–11]. Better understanding of interface reactions between porcelain and Ni–Cr alloy is necessary if more compatible metal/porcelain bond is to be developed. The present work investigates influences of firing temperature and firing time on microstructures and mechanical properties of interface between Ni–Cr alloy and porcelain. Its purpose was to obtain better understanding of the Ni–Cr/porcelain interface bond and provide some foundation for improving the quality of PFM restorations 2. Experimental Ni–Cr alloy (SHOFUUNIMETAL, Japan) was used with dental porcelain (SHOFU, Japan) in this investigation. The chemical compositions of the Ni–Cr alloy and dental porcelain are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The Ni–Cr alloy plates (30 mm × 30 mm × 1 mm) were cast with centrifugal casting machine according to proper operating instructions. Every alloy plate was cut into six base metal specimens with dimensions of 15 mm × 10 mm × 1 mm by electrical discharge machining. Prior to porcelain veneering, surfaces of base metal specimens (15mm × 10 mm) were polished with 800-grit SiC sandpaper, and then ultrasonically cleaned in an acetone bath and rinsed

422

J. Liu et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425

Table 1 Chemical composition of Ni–Cr alloy (wt%) Ni

Cr

Mo

Al

Be

Others

77.0

14.0

4.7

2.0

1.8

0.5

Table 2 Chemical composition of porcelain (opaque PA2 O, body porcelain A2 B) (wt%) SiO2

Al2 O3

SnO2

Others

55–60

12–15

6–15

10–15

in deionized water for 5 min to remove surface contaminants. Two coats of opaque porcelain (PA2 O) condensed by vibration and blotting procedures were applied on the specimen surface, each being about 0.2 mm thick, and then the body porcelain (A2 B) was subsequently formed by use of a brush and a vibrator. The porcelain on metal specimen surface was fired in the vacuum porcelain furnace (Multimat 99 VACV MAT 2500, Germany). Effects of firing parameters on microstructures and mechanical properties of metal/porcelain interfaces were investigated by changing firing temperatures (930–1040 ◦ C) and firing times (0.5–15 min). The firing technological parameters are shown in Table 3. After porcelain firing, a uniform porcelain with 1.0 mm in thickness was applied along an 10 mm length in the central portion of the metal specimen surface. The cross-sections of specimens with porcelain were ground, polished, and etched in 2 g CuCl2 ·2H2 O, 40 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid and 50 ml 95% ethyl alcohol for metallographic examination. The microstructures of metal/porcelain interfaces were examined using SEM (Model JSM-5310, Japan), EDS (Model Link-Isis, Britain) and XRD (Model D/Max 2500PC, Japan). The shear test was carried out at room temperature by means of electronic universal testing machine (Model CSS-44100, China) with a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min. The schematic of shear test is shown in Fig. 1. The shear bond strength of metal/porcelain interface was determined, based on the average of three measurements per condition. After the shear test, fractured surfaces of the metal and porcelain were examined.

Fig. 1. The schematic of shear test.

3. Results and discussion 3.1. Microstructures of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface Fig. 2 shows SEM microstructures of Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces produced at firing temperatures of 930 ◦ C, 990 ◦ C and 1040 ◦ C for firing time of 1.0 min. As can be seen, the bond interface is smooth and compact, there exists a reaction layer in the interface, and the thickness of reaction layer increases with rising firing temperature. Some microcracks were observed at porcelain side of the metal/porcelain interface produced at firing temperature of 1040 ◦ C, as shown in Fig. 2(c). Fig. 3 illustrates EDS element line distribution of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface produced at firing temperTable 3 Firing technological parameters Firing cycle

Pre-oxidation

Opaque (first)

Opaque (second)

Body porcelain

Low temperature (◦ C) Preheat time (s) Heat rate (◦ C/min) Firing temperature (◦ C) Firing time (min) Vacuum level (hPa) Cooling

680 10 100 980 0.5 50 Air cooling

680 60 60 930–1040 0.5–15 50 Air cooling

680 60 60 930–1040 0.5–15 50 Air cooling

680 120 60 930–1040 0.5–15 50 Air cooling

Fig. 2. Microstructures of Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces produced at different firing temperatures for firing time of 1.0 min: (a) T = 930 ◦ C; (b) T = 990 ◦ C; (c) T = 1040 ◦ C.

J. Liu et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425

423

type and compound type (mixed type), which has higher adhesion strength than diffusion type due to the formation of new phases at the interfaces [13,14]. It has been reported that a very thin Cr2 O3 layer already exists on the surface of the Ni–Cr alloy at the start of the firing process because of the high surface-segregation ability and high chemical activity of chromium [12]. The chromium-oxide layer produces a diffusion barrier between the metal and the fusing porcelain. Only the grain and phase boundaries form fast diffusion paths for the diffusing atoms. Temperature has a most profound influence on the diffusion coefficient and diffusion rate. It can be explained that the thickness of reaction layer increases in terms of increasing the diffusion coefficient and diffusion rate of atoms at higher firing temperature. At relatively low firing temperature (930 ◦ C), there is an intermixing at Ni–Cr/porcelain interface by interdiffusion of atoms to form the interface of diffusion type due to low diffusion rates. As firing temperature rises, the diffusion coefficient and diffusion rate of atoms increase, which promotes the formation and growth of SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 phases producing the interface with mixed type. These oxides emerging at the Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces play a fundamental role in adherence. 3.2. Mechanical properties of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface

ature of 990 ◦ C for firing time of 1.0 min, its location being shown by line ab in Fig. 2(b). The EDS analysis results indicated that the interdiffusion of atoms occurred during firing, Al, Si, Sn and O diffusing from porcelain material into Ni–Cr alloy, and Ni and Cr diffusing into the porcelain material. The reaction of metal/porcelain interfaces is complicated. In these complex systems, diffusion bond is established not only by mutual interdiffusion but also by simultaneous solid-state reactions [12]. From X-ray diffraction patterns of Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces shown in Fig. 4, the phase composition of the interfaces is related to firing temperature. When the firing temperature was 930 ◦ C, the interface contained SnO2 and AlNi3 phases. It should be diffusion type due to the interface bond by the interdiffusion of atoms. As firing temperature rose from 960 ◦ C to 990 ◦ C, new phases (SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 ) were identified in the X-ray diffraction patterns and the diffraction peaks of SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 were stronger at firing temperature of 990 ◦ C. These results suggest that SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 phases form at Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces and their amounts increase with rising firing temperature from 960 ◦ C to 990 ◦ C. So, the interfaces are an integration of diffusion

Acceptable PFM restorations require metals and porcelains to be of chemical compatibility which implies a bond strong enough to resist both transient and residual thermal stresses in firing process and mechanical forces encountered in clinical function [5]. Otherwise, the PFM restorations are induced to fracture and exfoliation of porcelain due to enduring chew press of each orientation when teeth occlude, and their service life is affected. So, it is necessary to have a high bond strength of metal/porcelain interface for PFM restorations. The research results indicated that firing temperature and firing time have an obvious effect on shear bond strength of metal/porcelain interface. Fig. 5 shows the influence of different firing temperatures for firing time of 1.0 min on the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface. It can be seen that the shear bond strength of the metal/porcelain interface increases at first and then decreases with rising firing temperature from 930 ◦ C to 1040 ◦ C. At relatively low firing temperature (930 ◦ C), the Ni–Cr/porcelain interface had a poor shear bond strength of 23.6 MPa. Fracture occurred in interface between metal and porcelain, and the metal/porcelain interface completely peeled off. It is mainly associated with the low metallurgical bond force between metal and porcelain due to element interaction feebleness to form the interface with diffusion type under the relatively low firing temperature. With rising firing temperature, the shear bond

Fig. 4. X-ray diffraction patterns of Ni–Cr/porcelain interfaces at different firing temperatures for firing time of 1.0 min.

Fig. 5. The influence of different firing temperatures for firing time of 1.0 min on shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface.

Fig. 3. Element line distribution of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface produced at firing temperature of 990 ◦ C for firing time of 1.0 min.

424

J. Liu et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425

Fig. 6. Fracture surface morphology of the specimen after shear test: (a) the morphology of retained porcelain on Ni–Cr alloy; (b) the fracture surface morphology of retained porcelain at higher magnification.

strength of the interface was significantly improved because the interface reaction resulted in forming new phases (SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 ) during the firing process, which is in agreement with the XRD results shown in Fig. 4. The shear bond strength of the Ni–Cr/porcelain interface reached 37.5 MPa at firing temperature of 990 ◦ C for 1.0 min. Fracture also occurred at metal/porcelain interface, but a large amount of retained porcelains were observed on the metal surface, as shown in Fig. 6. Fig. 6(a) shows the morphology of the retained porcelain on Ni–Cr alloy with a macro-image, and Fig. 6(b) illustrates the typical fracture surface morphology of the retained porcelain at higher magnification. These results confirm that the Ni–Cr/porcelain interface is an integration of diffusion type and compound type. The increased shear bond strength of the interface is mainly attributed to the formation and growth of SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 phases producing strong metallurgical bond force between metal and porcelain. Further rising firing temperature to 1040 ◦ C resulted in sharply decreasing the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface. According to the research results of interface microstructures, there exist some microcracks at porcelain side of metal/porcelain interface produced at firing temperature of 1040 ◦ C. During shear test, the specimen with porcelain was subjected to applied mechanical force and the microcracks act as preferential sites for the initiation and propagation of cracks due to stress concentration in microcrack tips. The existence of the microcracks should be the main reason that the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface sharply decreases when firing temperature is 1040 ◦ C. These results suggest that firing temperature is one of controlling factors for the bond strength of metal/porcelain interface, and it is favorable to select proper firing temperature for improving the bond strength of the interface. Fig. 7 shows the influence of different firing times at firing temperature of 990 ◦ C on shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface. As can be seen, the influence of firing time on the shear bond strength is similar to that of firing temperature. At firing time of 0.5 min, the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface was 13.6 MPa. Fracture occurred at metal/porcelain interface, and the interface completely peeled off. With an increase of firing times from 0.5 min to 2.5 min the shear bond strength of interface increased and the maximum shear bond strength reached 43.8 MPa at firing time of 2.5 min. Fracture also occurred at metal/porcelain interface and there exist a large amount of retained porcelains on the metal surface. It should also be related to the formation and growth of new phases producing strong metallurgical bond force between metal and porcelain. Further increasing firing times from 2.5 min to 15 min, the shear bond strength of the interface decreased. Therefore, it is also favorable to select proper

Fig. 7. The influence of different firing times for firing temperature of 990 ◦ C on shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface.

firing time for improving the bond strength of metal/porcelain interface. 4. Conclusions (1) There exists a reaction layer in Ni–Cr/porcelain bond interface. The phase composition of the metal/porcelain interface is complicated and mainly contains SnO2 , AlNi3, SnCr0.14 OX and KAlSi2 O6. The increase of firing temperature and firing time favors the formation and growth of new phases (SnCr0.14 Ox and KAlSi2 O6 ) in Ni–Cr/porcelain interface. (2) Firing temperature and firing time strongly affect the shear bond strength of Ni–Cr/porcelain interface relative to the different reaction layer structures. The shear bond strength reaches 43.8 MPa at firing temperature of 990 ◦ C for firing time of 2.5 min. It is necessary to select proper firing parameters for improving the bond strength of metal/porcelain interface and the quality of PFM restorations. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Jilin Province Committee of Science and Technology of China for financial support (no. 20050511). References [1] M. Könönen, J. Kivilahti, J. Dent. Res. 80 (2001) 848–854. [2] H.J. Almilhatti, E.T. Giampaolo, C.E. Vergani, A.L. Machado, A.C. Pavarina, J. Dent. 31 (2003) 205–211. [3] J.R. Kelly, I. Nishimural, S.D. Campbell, J. Prosthet. Dent. 75 (1996) 18–32.

J. Liu et al. / Materials Science and Engineering A 497 (2008) 421–425 [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]

R.J. Dent, J.D. Preston, J.P. Moffa, A. Caputo, J. Prosthet. Dent. 47 (1982) 59–62. H. Yilmaz, C. Dincer, J. Dent. 27 (1999) 215–222. J.X. Zhang, R.S. Chandel, H.P. Seow, Mater. Chem. Phys. 75 (2002) 256–259. S. Atsü, S. Berksun, J. Prosthet. Dent. 84 (2000) 567–574. A.C. Quaas, S. Heide, S. Freitag, M. Kern, Dent. Mater. 21 (2005) 192–200. A. UI-Hamid, Mater. Chem. Phys. 80 (2003) 135–142.

425

[10] S. Zinelis, A. Tsetsekou, P. Triantafillos, J. Prosthet. Dent. 90 (2003) 332–338. [11] H.L. Huang, Y.Z. Chen, D. Gan, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 328 (2002) 238–244. ˝ [12] C. Hegedus, L. Daróczi, V. Kökényesi, D.L. Beke, J. Dent. Res. 81 (2002) 334–337. [13] R.Z. Zuo, L.T. Li, Z.L. Gui, Piezoelectr. Acoustoopt. 22 (2000) 335–337. [14] Z.D. Zou, X.H. Wang, X.M. Liu, Acta Metall. Sinica 36 (2000) 1279–1283.