Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives

Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives

Accepted Manuscript Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives Lin Chen, Zhaosheng Yu, Hao Xu, K...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 30 Views

Accepted Manuscript Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives Lin Chen, Zhaosheng Yu, Hao Xu, Kuangyu Wan, Yanfen Liao, Xiaoqian Ma PII: DOI: Reference:

S0960-8524(18)31518-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.086 BITE 20650

To appear in:

Bioresource Technology

Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date:

12 September 2018 29 October 2018 30 October 2018

Please cite this article as: Chen, L., Yu, Z., Xu, H., Wan, K., Liao, Y., Ma, X., Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives, Bioresource Technology (2018), doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.086

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and wood sawdust using different additives Lin Chena,b, Zhaosheng Yua,b *, Hao Xua,b, Kuangyu Wan a,b, Yanfen Liaoa,b, Xiaoqian Maa,b a School

of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, 510640,

Guangzhou, China b

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy

Utilization, 510640, Guangzhou, China Abstract The microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris (CV), wood sawdust (WS) and their blends with additives were investigated. There was a higher liquid and solid yield with silicon carbide (SiC) than activated carbon (AC) in most of samples. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis with additives behaved a positive effect on deoxygenation and aromatization, but not apparent denitrification. With the increase of CV proportion, aromatic hydrocarbons decreased, but aliphatic hydrocarbons increased using AC. High selectivity of phenols was reached at the sample of WS (relative content as 43.6%) using SiC; High selectivity of alkenes was reached at the sample of CV (relative content as 31.2%) and alkanes at the blend sample of 70% CV and 30% WS (relative content as 9.45%). Bio-oil and biochar from microwaveassisted pyrolysis of WS had higher calorific value than that of CV both with AC and

*

Corresponding author at: School of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, 510640

Guangzhou, China. Email: [email protected] (Z. Yu).

SiC. Calorific value of bio-oil decreased by 33.3% after mixing CV with WS. Keywords: Co-pyrolysis; Chlorella vulgaris; Sawdust; Microwave-assisted; Additives

1

2

1

Introduction

In pace with fossil fuel depletion aggravation, the utilization of renewable energy

3

has been a hot spot for research, and urgently needs to evolve. Compared to many

4

alternative energy resources such as wind power, solar power, tidal energy and hydro-

5

energy, biomass energy is the only one that can be conveyed and stored, and also the

6

oldest energy used by human beings. Moreover, biomass is the only sustainable

7

resource of organic carbon capable of producing petroleum-like oils and chemicals

8

(Yang et al., 2017). There are numerous methods for the conversion of biomass to

9

surrogate fuel and bio-chemical products, and they can be generally divided as

10

chemical methods, thermochemical methods and biochemical methods. Microwave-

11

assisted pyrolysis (MAP) is one of the most high-profile thermochemical process

12

under development in current years, because microwave heating owns the features of

13

volumetric heating, a fast heating rate, specified calefaction targets and automatic

14

control. MAP of biomass requires lower pyrolysis energy input and less average

15

activation energy than conventional pyrolysis, where heat conveys inefficiently from

16

exterior to interior. Luo et al. (Luo et al., 2017) found MAP of wood sawdust,

17

obtained more than 50% of liquid products, in which the yield of 78.7% was phenolic

18

chemicals at a 50-100°C lower temperature and 50-100 kJ/mol lower average

19

activation energy than that of conventional pyrolysis. Moreover, the MAP device is

20

less expensive due to its ability of rapid heating compared with conventional heating

21

devices (Wang et al., 2016).

22

Ordinary biomass usually has poor dielectric properties resulting in limited

23

valuable products during MAP (Namazi et al., 2015). While MAP with additives, the

24

yields and properties of the final products change significantly. For example, MAP of

25

lignin and low-density polyethylene with additives HZSM-5 and magnesium oxide

26

represented a higher bio-oil quantity and quality, the addition of HZSM-5 improved

27

the aromatization of chain hydrocarbons, and magnesium oxide improved the

28

selectivity of alkylated phenols (Fan et al., 2017). MAP of wood sawdust with

29

different additives resulted in significant effects on final products, by using silica

30

carbon decreased the gas and liquid yields, using potassium carbonate and sodium

31

hydrate increased gas yield strongly (Shang et al., 2015b). Generally, additives for

32

MAP participate in reaction not only as absorbents to enhance heating but also as

33

catalysts to improve the reaction rate, differentiate the reaction path and thus decrease

34

the energy consumption. Therefore, in order to improve the target valuable products

35

in biomass microwave-assisted heating process, additives are essential. Additives for

36

microwave can be categorized as carbon-based materials, metal oxides and zeolites. It

37

has been proved that the carbon-based materials are very suitable absorbents of

38

microwaves, which had a remarkable effect (Fang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2016).

39

Two of the most commonly used carbon-based additives, activated carbon (AC) and

40

silicon carbide (SiC) were applied in this work. More studies about AC or SiC used in

41

MAP could be found in other literature and experiments (Borges et al., 2014a; Li et

42

al., 2016).

43

Chlorella vulgaris (CV) is a typical kind of algae biomass with widespread

44

growth globally. The main compositions of microalgae are lipids, proteins,

45

carbohydrates, inorganic elements (Fe, Cu, Mn, Zn, Se, etc.), vitamins as well as folic

46

acid. Some of the lipids proportion can even reach up to 50-55 wt.% on dry basis

47

(Zhang et al., 2017). On the other hand, algal biomass as the third-generation

48

sustainable biomass has its own predominant growth behavior such as fast growth

49

rate, high CO2 capture capacity, no need for arable land and fairly simple cultivation

50

conditions (Chen et al., 2018a; Maliutina et al., 2018). Therefore, it is a promising

51

feedstock for value-added chemical byproducts and/or biofuel. Wood sawdust (WS) is

52

a typical kind of lignocellulosic biomass, cellulose is its primary component (23.7-

53

61.7 wt. %), followed by hemicellulose and lignin (Zhang et al., 2017). Previous

54

researches found cellulose and hemicellulose could produce more bio-oil during

55

pyrolysis than lignin (Zhao et al., 2016). Moreover, mass-produce of sawdust from

56

agroforestry make it easier for industrial production (Kumar et al., 2017). Hence, CV

57

and WS were chose as typical biomass feedstock for MAP in this work.

58

Considerable researches have been focused on co-pyrolysis of biomass, such as

59

co-pyrolysis of rice straw and polyethylene (Xiang et al., 2018), lignocellulosic

60

biomass and coal (An et al., 2017; Tchapda et al., 2017) and microalgae and scum

61

(Xie et al., 2015). While few aims at co-pyrolysis of microalgae and wood sawdust,

62

which probably has a synergistic effect during the heating process, result in

63

improvement of useful products. This paper studied MAP of CV, WS and their blends

64

using AC or SiC as the additive, trying to figure out an optimal MAP conditions to

65

obtain value-added chemicals or high caloric value products.

66

2

67

2.1 Materials

Materials and methods

68

Chlorella vulgaris (CV) in powder form was bought from SCIPHAR Natural

69

Products Co. Ltd. (Shaanxi Province, China) with particle size less than 178 μm. Wood

70

sawdust (WS) was acquired from local wood processing plant in state of powder (<

71

200 μm). After air forced dried at 105°C until the weight was steady, all sample

72

powders were stored in desiccator on standby.

73

The additives, activated carbon (AC) and silicon carbide (SiC), were purchased

74

from Guangzhou Cong Yuan Instrument Co. Ltd. (Guangdong Province, China). AC

75

and SiC were all ground into 80 mesh, and correspond to standard with analytical

76

reagent (purity≥98.0%).

77

All samples and additives were measured according to ASTM D3176 for carbon

78

(C), hydrogen (H), nitrogen (N), and sulfur (S) by Vario El Cube Elemental Analyzer

79

(Elementar Co. Ltd., German). Oxygen (O) content was calculated by difference.

80

Moisture, ash, volatile matter and fixed carbon were obtained by drier (DHG-9070A,

81

Shanghai Qixin Science Instruments Co. Ltd., China) and Ash Tester (MF-2000,

82

Hegang Haotian Electrical Co. Ltd., China) according to GB/T212-2008 and GB211-

83

84. Higher calorific value (HHV) was tested by Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter (TE-C610,

84

Changsha Titen Electronic Co. Ltd., China) according to ASTM D5865. Dielectric

85

properties of parent samples and additives were interpreted by dielectric loss tangent,

86

tanδ, using Eq. 1 (Sun et al., 2016):

87

tanδ =

𝜀'' 𝜀'

(1)

88

Where ε'' is the dielectric loss factor, which indicates microwave dissipation

89

efficiency of materials. ε' is dielectric coefficient, which represents microwave

90

absorption intensity of materials. There is no explicit relationship between ε' and ε'',

91

while tanδ is a rough estimate for the ability of converting electromagnetic energy into

92

heat. The higher tanδ is, the better capacity of microwave absorption for materials

93

becomes. Basic characteristics of biomass feedstock and additives were listed in Table.

94

1. Blending ratios of CV and WS were set up 5 levels by mass percentage, i.e. 100%CV,

95

70%CV with 30%WS, 50%CV with 50%WS, 30%CV with 70%WS, and 100%WS,

96

abbreviated as CV, 70CV30WS, 50CV50WS, 30CV70WS and WS, hereafter.

97

Blending ratio of parent samples and microwave additive was 10:1 by mass percentage.

98

2.2 Experimental apparatus and procedure

99

The co-pyrolysis experiments were carried out on a self-built microwave-assisted

100

pyrolysis (MAP) platform, as shown in Fig. 1. This platform consists of four parts:

101

Microwave occurrence system, material reaction system, product collection system

102

and data acquisition system. The microwave rated power was 1000 W, 2.45 GHz

103

uniformly in this work. The temperature sensor used in this experiment was 4 mm

104

diameter K-type thermocouple with the thermometric range between 0-1600°C,

105

temperature precision of ±1.5°C. Magnetrons were uniformly distributed as shown in

106

Fig. 1 in order to ensure the homogeneous microwave distribution during the reaction.

107

30.00±0.01 g of blending samples with 3.00±0.01 g AC or SiC were fully mixed and

108

placed in the clean and dry quartz flask. After checking out the sealing property of gas

109

flow unit, high purity N2 as an inert carrier gas was introduced to the flask

110

consistently for 10 min with a flow rate of 300 mL/min, in order to vent detained air.

111

Afterwards, switching on microwave heating system for 25 min. Then, microwave

112

heating system was switched off and the reaction chamber was naturally air-cooled to

113

room temperature with uninterrupted N2 atmosphere. Finally, solid residue was

114

remained in the flask. Condensable gas was cooled by chill water (5°C) and collected

115

as bio-oil in conical bottles. Incondensable gas was obtained by difference on the

116

basis of mass equilibrium. Three phase products under different blending ratios and

117

additives were weighed up and calculated. Micro positive pressure in gas flow unit

118

was used during the whole MAP process. Each MAP experiment was carried out

119

twice. Standard deviation of two batches were presented in the form of the error bar.

120

2.3 Analytical methods

121

The acquired liquid content was immediately diluted by dichloromethane solvent

122

to a proper concentration. Processed liquid products (designated as bio-oils hereafter)

123

were examined by the Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) (Agilent

124

7890B & 5977A, Agilent Technologies Inc. U.S.A). The metal capillary column type

125

was HP-5ms, 30 m×0.25 mm ID×0.25 μm. The oven temperature was set from 50°C

126

(held for 1 min) to 260°C (held for 5 min), at a heating rate of 5 °C/min. The injector

127

temperature was maintained at 290°C and the injection volume was 1 μL using a split

128

ratio of 1:50. The carrier gas (high pure helium) rate was 1 mL/min. The scan range of

129

the quadrupole mass spectrometer was between 50 and 500 m/z. The chemical

130

compounds in bio-oils were identified by NIST data library and relevant literature. The Higher calorific value (HHV) of bio-oils (i.e. liquid products after

131 132

dehydrated) and residues (i.e. solid products after fully ground) were tested by

133

Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter (TE-C610, Changsha Titen Electronic Co., Ltd, China)

134

according to ASTM D5865.

135

3

136

3.1 Temperature profiles of additives

137

Results and discussion

2.45 GHz frequency of microwave power, corresponding to 12.5 cm wavelength

138

is the conventional set value for microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP) of biomass

139

(Antunes et al., 2018; Motasemi & Afzal, 2013b). Thus, it has been used as a constant

140

value in this work. However setting up an accurate microwave temperature during

141

MAP was tricky (Du et al., 2011), even for the same sample, the ability of microwave

142

heating was still affected by numerous factors such as initial temperature, sample

143

stacking density, particle size, sample moisture, magnetron distribution, reactor shape

144

and especially additive type. Additives are the major accelerator of temperature,

145

sketch of temperature to time for sole activated carbon (AC) and sole silicon carbide

146

(SiC) can help explain its microwave absorption capacity. Fig. 2 illustrates

147

temperature rise curves of AC and SiC. Though both AC and SiC are excellent

148

microwave absorbers, they obeyed different absorption regularity. AC at the

149

beginning had a rapid temperature rise before 200 s, after that, the rise speed slowed

150

down during 200-360 s owing to the great vaporization of volatiles and inner water,

151

who were strong absorbers of microwave. Temperature later ascended markedly to

152

nearly 800°C at around 450 s. finally, temperature with AC additives were settled at

153

around 760°C. As for SiC, temperature increased quickly before 220 s, slowed down

154

the heating pace during 220-560°C, promptly raised at 470-490°C and declined at

155

490-520°C, this phenomenon might come from the instability of MAP system in the

156

early stage. This stage happened in the first 10 min of heating stage, and the whole

157

heating stage lasted for 25 min to guarantee adequate heating. Finally, temperature

158

with SiC rebounded a little and waved at around 660°C. By calculating the first-order

159

derivative of Fig. 2, the temperature profile of both AC and SiC fluctuated at first

160

owing to heat conduction inhomogeneity of additives and instability of MAP system

161

at the very start. In the main pyrolysis stage, the rapid temperature rise period of AC

162

was earlier and more violent than SiC.

163

3.2 Yields of three-phase products

164

Fig. 3 charted the yield distribution of solid, liquid and gas products of MAP

165

under different blending ratios and additives. It was noted that both blending ratios

166

and additives affected yield distribution greatly. With regard to the additives, samples

167

of MAP with AC had a higher gas yield and lower solid yield under all Chlorella

168

vulgaris (CV) and wood sawdust (WS) blending ratios. As for liquid yield, AC as the

169

additive had a slight lower value except that of 100% CV proportion. The result

170

revealed that AC could absorb microwave irradiation more strongly, which may due

171

to the existence of local high temperature at hot spots in AC case. Active dipolar

172

friction intensity and interfacial polarization effects could generate sparks where

173

pyrolysis vapors were further pyrolyzed into small gas molecules (Dai et al., 2017).

174

Some research also found AC can give rise to hot spots in the form of small sparks

175

and electric arcs termed as micro plasmas (Mushtaq et al., 2014). AC hereby

176

presented more active dipolar friction intensity and interfacial polarization effects

177

than SiC, consequently inducing more gas yield and liquid yield at all CV proportion

178

levels. Another factor that resulted in the three-phase distribution difference between

179

AC and SiC probably was the density difference. Heterogeneity by big density

180

difference between parent samples (CV and WS) and additives would affect gas and

181

liquid yields(Shang et al., 2015a). The density of AC and SiC was 0.38-0.65 g/cm3

182

and 3.2 g/cm3, respectively. Apparently the former one was more similar to the

183

density of CV and WS, which urged CV to be more active in these experiments.

184

As for the effect of different blending ratios, higher CV proportion palpably

185

resulted in less gas yield, more liquid and solid content both in AC and SiC as the

186

additive cases. This was due to the component difference between CV and WS. Lipid

187

and protein in CV could be pyrolyzed into liquid. The main composition of WS was

188

cellulose, followed by hemicellulose and lignin, whose main pyrolysis output tended

189

to be small light molecules gases. MAP of KW only obtained 20.2-21.2% of liquid

190

products, which was lower than conventional pyrolysis method. In contrast, MAP of

191

CV obtained 45.3-49.3% of liquid products, which was higher than conventional

192

pyrolysis. For instance 34% of liquid product from CV could be received in the batch

193

pyrolysis reactor (Rizzo et al., 2013). But gas products from KW improved greatly by

194

MAP. Further investigations could pay attention to evaluation of gas products. In

195

brief, MAP of sole CV with SiC as the additive had a high yield of liquid products

196

and MAP of sole KW with AC as the additive had a high yield of gas product.

197

Microwave-assisted co-pyrolysis of CV and WS with AC leaded to acquire more

198

liquid product, and with SiC leaded to more gas product in general. Only from yields

199

of three-phase products, it is difficult to tell whether there was synergism between CV

200

and WS. Therefore, pyrolysis products of bio-oils were discussed in the next section.

201

3.3 GC-MS characterization of bio-oils

202

Semi quantitative analysis results of bio-oils by GC-MS method were

203

summarized in Fig. 4. Specific pyrolysis products of bio-oils could be found in E-

204

supplementary data. E-supplementary data of this work can be found in online version

205

of the paper. Apparently, the content of chemical constituents varied with additive

206

types and blending ratios of CV and WS. On the one hand, comparing Fig. 4(a) with

207

Fig. 4(b), samples with AC as the additive inclined to produce more aromatic

208

hydrocarbons, particularly polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and BTEXs (a

209

generic name for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-, m- and p-xylenes). PAHs

210

were the most concentrated chemical composition for WS-AC (notated as parent

211

sample name-additive name, the same below), 30CV70WS-AC and 50CV50WS-AC

212

with peak area of 48.65%, 27.28% and 29.92%, respectively. Phenols were the second

213

concentrated chemical composition for WS-AC (a peak area of 22.65%) and

214

30CV70WS-AC (a peak area of 21.27%). With the increase of CV proportion,

215

relative content of PAHs and phenols declined to its bottom at CV-AC with a peak

216

area of 14.07% and 3.30%, respectively. Higher content of WS in samples preferred

217

to produce more PAHs, as well as phenols when use AC as the additive. This was

218

attributed to MAP of cellulose, as well as lignin in WS, which had highly polymerized

219

phenyl structure inside (Fan et al., 2018). Furthermore, the phenolic compounds

220

generally came from the thermal degradation of the phenylpropanoid lignin structure

221

(Zheng et al., 2018). CV barely have no lignin, while lignin accounts for 13-30%

222

among the ingredients in raw WS (Chen et al., 2018b; Gu et al., 2013). Besides, With

223

the increase of CV proportion, BTEXs content improved as shown in Fig.4(a). High

224

BTEXs yield occurred at CV-AC, 70CV30WS-AC and 50CV50WS-AC with peak

225

area of 18.80%, 15.90% and 12.31%, respectively. Samples with higher CV

226

proportion tended to obtain more BTEXs chemicals, as well as nitrogenated

227

compounds probably owing to abundant protein and lipids in CV. BTEXs in CV-AC

228

and CV-SiC bio-oils mainly consisted of benzene, 1,3-(Fang et al., 2016)dimethyl-,

229

benzene and benzene, propyl-. However, BTEXs in 50CV50WS-AC and

230

50CV50WS-SiC bio-oils mainly consisted of ethylbenzene and benzene, 1,3-

231

dimethyl-. Different types of BTEXs between CV pyrolysis and 50CV50WS

232

pyrolysis indicated that interaction possibly happened between CV and WS.

233

Furthermore, compared to Fig. 4(b), Fig. 4(a) demonstrated that the presence of AC

234

which performed a strong absorptivity promoted further cracking of furans, especially

235

for WS sample. Furans were mainly derived from cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin

236

(Zheng et al., 2018), in accord with the main components of WS. In summary, it could

237

be safe to conclude that MAP with AC behaved a positive effect on aromatization.

238

WS-AC was an excellent collocation to obtain concentrated PAHs.

239

On the other hand, from Fig. 4(b), BTEXs yield when using SiC was generally

240

low in the range of 0.14% at WS-SiC to 10.09% at CV-SiC. And PAHs yield first

241

increased and then decreased with the increase ratio of CV; it achieved a maximum

242

value at 70CV30WS-SiC with peak area of 26.62%. Prominent constituents when

243

using SiC were aliphatic hydrocarbons and phenols. High alkanes and alkenes

244

emerged at CV-SiC and 30CV70WS-SiC with peak area of 9.83% for alkanes,

245

31.23% for alkenes and 9.45% for alkanes, 21.85% for alkenes, respectively. This was

246

1.5-3 times higher than that at AC conditions. As for phenols, peak value happened at

247

WS-SiC and 50CV50WS-SiC with peak area of 43.62% and 22.14%, respectively.

248

Analogously, previous work showed alkanes and aromatics formation during MAP of

249

soap stock were increased when using SiC particles as the microwave absorbent bed

250

(Wang et al., 2016). The specific phenolic components varied over blending ratios.

251

phenols in WS-SiC bio-oil were mainly comprised of phenol,2-methoxy-, creosol and

252

phenol, 4-ethyl-2-methoxy-, while phenols in 50CV50WS-SiC bio-oil mainly

253

included creosol, mequinol and phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(1-propenyl)-, (Z)-. This was

254

inferred that the alkylation reaction mechanism of phenol had changed after adding

255

CV into WS. From the perspective of phenols, aliphatic hydrocarbons and PAHs,

256

WS-SiC,CV-SiC and 70CV30SiC was the optimal condition. Respectively.

257

High proportion of value-added constituents with little or without useless

258

constituents were considered as high-quality bio-oils. Hydrocarbons are valuable

259

components in bio-oils from the perspective of fuel application (Bundhoo, 2018). For

260

example, adding aromatics can improve octane number for transportation fuel (Borges

261

et al., 2014b), adding alkanes and alkenes will enhance caloric value of combustion

262

fuel for heat generation. BTEXs could be applied as important industrial chemicals to

263

produce synthetic fibers, synthetic rubber, adhesives, dyestuff, flavors, etc. Phenols

264

could be served in agriculture industry, pharmaceutical industry and preservative

265

field. From Fig. 4 and previous discussion in this section, bio-oils from MAP with

266

carbon-based additives of CV, WS and their blends contained many useful

267

components; negligible acids and oxygen-containing substance such as esters,

268

ketones, aldehydes and alcohols were mixed in. Compared to traditional direct

269

pyrolysis of microalgae (Zainan et al., 2018) and wood dust (Chen et al., 2018b),

270

MAP apparently lowered acids and oxygenated compounds of products. But with

271

regard to nitrogenated compounds, refining effect by MAP was not obvious. High

272

selectivity of PAHs in bio-oils could be received at WS-AC 30CV70WS-AC,

273

50CV50WS-AC and 70CV30WS-SiC. High selectivity of phenols could be received

274

at WS-SiC. And high selectivity of aliphatic hydrocarbon could be received at CV-

275

SiC and 50CV50WS-SiC. The next investigation direction points to the enhancement

276

and purification of targeted products during or after pyrolysis under these optimal

277

blend ratios and additives.

278

3.4 Calorific value distribution of products

279

Higher calorific value (HHV) was an important evaluation index to assess the

280

quality of products. From HHV of bio-oil and bio-char listed in Table 2., fluctuation

281

trend could be found. With regard to bio-oil, WS-AC and WS-SiC had the highest

282

HHV, the value of 28.66-29.30 MJ/kg for WS pyrolysis bio-oil was higher than that

283

from conventional pyrolysis such as fluidized bed reactor (Wang et al., 2013) or fixed

284

bed reactor (Kabir & Hameed, 2017), compared to WS-AC and WS-SiC, CV-AC and

285

CV-SiC had a relative low HHV. But it was similar to those conventional pyrolysis

286

(Chen et al., 2015). This was in contrast to parent sample (HHV of WS was 18.42

287

MJ/kg, HHV of CV was 22.06 MJ/kg). Similar trends were happened in bio-char,

288

HHV of bio-char from WS had a higher value, especially when using SiC as the

289

additive, it reached up to 31.84 MJ/kg. While the bio-char of CV obtained a low

290

HHV. The reason was that microalgae bio-char had less carbon content than

291

lignocellulose bio-char (Azizi et al., 2018). In other words, MAP of WS with carbon-

292

based additive to produce high calorific value products is more practical than that of

293

CV. The mixing degree of CV and WS also affected HHV greatly. HHV of bio-oil

294

decreased by one third to half after mixing, 50CV50WS attained the worst. Moreover,

295

HHV of bio-char decreased with the increase of CV proportion in samples and using

296

AC as the additive did not gain much privilege for HHV of bio-char. In general, bio-

297

char of WS by MAP improved most apparently compared to WS feedstock, which

298

may be applied as solid fuels for energy plant, feedstock for gasification process,

299

feedstock for catalyst or restoration of land, purifier for water pollution, etc

300

(Motasemi & Afzal, 2013a).

301

4

302

Conclusions

AC could improve the aromatization of chain like hydrocarbons in bio-oils from

303

MAP of WS, 30CV70WS and 50CV50WS, SiC could improve the selectivity of

304

aliphatic hydrocarbons in bio-oils from MAP of CV and 30CV70WS. Bio-oil with

305

high selective can be applied as blending stock for conventional fuel or industrial

306

chemical feedstock after further refining. The synergies resulted from co-pyrolysis of

307

CV and WS were obvious in terms of calorific value fluctuation. In conclusion, using

308

carbon-based additives and combination CV with WS could be alternative methods to

309

improve products quality of MAP of biomass.

310

Acknowledgments

311

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

312

(51406058, 51476060, 51606071); the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation

313

(2015A030313227); the China Scholarship Council (201706155065); the Guangdong

314

Province Engineering Research Center of Highly Efficient and Low Pollution Energy

315

Conversion; the Key Laboratory of Efficient and Clean Energy Utilization of

316

Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, South China University of Technology

317

(KLB10004).

References 1.

An, Y., Tahmasebi, A., Yu, J. 2017. Mechanism of synergy effect during microwave co-pyrolysis of biomass and lignite. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 128, 75-82.

2.

Antunes, E., Jacob, M.V., Brodie, G., Schneider, P.A. 2018. Microwave pyrolysis of sewage biosolids: Dielectric properties, microwave susceptor role and its impact on biochar properties. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 129, 93-100.

3.

Azizi, K., Keshavarz Moraveji, M., Abedini Najafabadi, H. 2018. A review on bio-fuel production from microalgal biomass by using pyrolysis method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3046-3059.

4.

Borges, F.C., Du, Z., Xie, Q., Trierweiler, J.O., Cheng, Y., Wan, Y., Liu, Y., Zhu, R., Lin, X., Chen, P., Ruan, R. 2014a. Fast microwave assisted pyrolysis of biomass using microwave absorbent. Bioresource Technology, 156, 267-274.

5.

Borges, F.C., Xie, Q., Min, M., Muniz, L.A.R., Farenzena, M., Trierweiler, J.O., Chen, P., Ruan, R. 2014b. Fast microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae using microwave absorbent and HZSM-5 catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 166, 518526.

6.

Bundhoo, Z.M.A. 2018. Microwave-assisted conversion of biomass and waste materials to biofuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 11491177.

7.

Chen, L., Yu, Z., Liang, J., Liao, Y., Ma, X. 2018a. Co-pyrolysis of chlorella vulgaris and kitchen waste with different additives using TG-FTIR and PyGC/MS. Energy Conversion and Management, 177, 582-591.

8.

Chen, W.-H., Lin, B.-J., Huang, M.-Y., Chang, J.-S. 2015. Thermochemical conversion of microalgal biomass into biofuels: A review. Bioresource Technology, 184, 314-327.

9.

Chen, W.-H., Wang, C.-W., Kumar, G., Rousset, P., Hsieh, T.-H. 2018b. Effect of torrefaction pretreatment on the pyrolysis of rubber wood sawdust analyzed by Py-GC/MS. Bioresource Technology, 259, 469-473.

10. Dai, L., Fan, L., Duan, D., Ruan, R., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Yu, Z., Liu, Y., Jiang, L. 2017. Production of hydrocarbon-rich bio-oil from soapstock via fast microwave-assisted catalytic pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 125, 356-362. 11. Du, Z., Li, Y., Wang, X., Wan, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, C., Lin, X., Liu, Y., Chen, P., Ruan, R. 2011. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of microalgae for biofuel production. Bioresource Technology, 102(7), 4890-4896. 12. Fan, L., Chen, P., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Dai, L., Ruan, R. 2017. Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignin and low-density polyethylene with HZSM-5 and MgO for improved bio-oil yield and quality. Bioresource Technology, 225, 199-205. 13. Fan, L., Chen, P., Zhou, N., Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Omar, M.M., Peng, P., Addy, M., Cheng, Y., Ruan, R. 2018. In-situ and ex-situ catalytic upgrading of vapors from microwave-assisted pyrolysis of lignin. Bioresource Technology, 247, 851-858. 14. Fang, S., Gu, W., Dai, M., Xu, J., Yu, Z., Lin, Y., Chen, J., Ma, X. 2018. A study on microwave-assisted fast co-pyrolysis of chlorella and tire in the N2 and CO2 atmospheres. Bioresource Technology, 250, 821-827. 15. Fang, S., Yu, Z., Lin, Y., Lin, Y., Fan, Y., Liao, Y., Ma, X. 2016. Effects of additives on the co-pyrolysis of municipal solid waste and paper sludge by using thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology, 209, 265-272. 16. Gu, X., Ma, X., Li, L., Liu, C., Cheng, K., Li, Z. 2013. Pyrolysis of poplar wood sawdust by TG-FTIR and Py–GC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 102, 16-23. 17. Kabir, G., Hameed, B.H. 2017. Recent progress on catalytic pyrolysis of

lignocellulosic biomass to high-grade bio-oil and bio-chemicals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 945-967. 18. Kumar, P., Kumar, P., Rao, P.V.C., Choudary, N.V., Sriganesh, G. 2017. Saw dust pyrolysis: Effect of temperature and catalysts. Fuel, 199, 339-345. 19. Li, H., Li, X., Liu, L., Li, K., Wang, X., Li, H. 2016. Experimental study of microwave-assisted pyrolysis of rice straw for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(4), 2263-2267. 20. Luo, H., Bao, L., Kong, L., Sun, Y. 2017. Low temperature microwave-assisted pyrolysis of wood sawdust for phenolic rich compounds: Kinetics and dielectric properties analysis. Bioresource Technology, 238, 109. 21. Maliutina, K., Tahmasebi, A., Yu, J. 2018. The transformation of nitrogen during pressurized entrained-flow pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris. Bioresource Technology, 262, 90-97. 22. Motasemi, F., Afzal, M.T. 2013a. A review on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis technique. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 317-330. 23. Motasemi, F., Afzal, M.T. 2013b. A review on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis technique. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 317-330. 24. Mushtaq, F., Mat, R., Ani, F.N. 2014. A review on microwave assisted pyrolysis of coal and biomass for fuel production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 555-574. 25. Namazi, A.B., Allen, D.G., Jia, C.Q. 2015. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis and activation of pulp mill sludge. Biomass & Bioenergy, 73, 217-224. 26. Rizzo, A.M., Prussi, M., Bettucci, L., Libelli, I.M., Chiaramonti, D. 2013. Characterization of microalga Chlorella as a fuel and its thermogravimetric behavior. Applied Energy, 102, 24-31. 27. Shang, H., Lu, R.-R., Shang, L., Zhang, W.-H. 2015a. Effect of additives on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of sawdust. Fuel Processing Technology, 131, 167174.

28. Shang, H., Lu, R.R., Shang, L., Zhang, W.H. 2015b. Effect of additives on the microwave-assisted pyrolysis of sawdust. Fuel Processing Technology, 131, 167174. 29. Sun, J., Wang, W., Yue, Q., Ma, C., Zhang, J., Zhao, X., Song, Z. 2016. Review on microwave–metal discharges and their applications in energy and industrial processes. Applied Energy, 175, 141-157. 30. Tchapda, A.H., Krishnamoorthy, V., Yeboah, Y.D., Pisupati, S.V. 2017. Analysis of tars formed during co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass at high temperature in carbon dioxide atmosphere. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 128, 379-396. 31. Wang, K., Brown, R.C., Homsy, S., Martinez, L., Sidhu, S.S. 2013. Fast pyrolysis of microalgae remnants in a fluidized bed reactor for bio-oil and biochar production. Bioresource Technology, 127, 494-499. 32. Wang, Y., Dai, L., Wang, R., Fan, L., Liu, Y., Xie, Q., Ruan, R. 2016. Hydrocarbon fuel production from soapstock through fast microwave-assisted pyrolysis using microwave absorbent. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 119, 251-258. 33. Xiang, Z., Liang, J., Morgan, H.M., Liu, Y., Mao, H., Bu, Q. 2018. Thermal behavior and kinetic study for co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polyethylene over Cobalt modified ZSM-5 catalyst by thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology, 247, 804-811. 34. Xie, Q., Addy, M., Liu, S., Zhang, B., Cheng, Y., Wan, Y., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Lin, X., Chen, P., Ruan, R. 2015. Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of microalgae and scum for bio-oil production. Fuel, 160, 577-582. 35. Yang, Z., Kumar, A., Apblett, A.W., Moneeb, A.M. 2017. Co-Pyrolysis of torrefied biomass and methane over molybdenum modified bimetallic HZSM-5 catalyst for hydrocarbons production. Green Chemistry, 19(3), 757-768. 36. Zainan, N.H., Srivatsa, S.C., Li, F., Bhattacharya, S. 2018. Quality of bio-oil

from catalytic pyrolysis of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Fuel, 223, 12-19. 37. Zhang, Y., Chen, P., Liu, S., Peng, P., Min, M., Cheng, Y., Anderson, E., Zhou, N., Fan, L., Liu, C., Chen, G., Liu, Y., Lei, H., Li, B., Ruan, R. 2017. Effects of feedstock characteristics on microwave-assisted pyrolysis - A review. Bioresource Technology, 230, 143-151. 38. Zhao, C., Jiang, E., Chen, A. 2016. Volatile production from pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Journal of the Energy Institute. 39. Zheng, Y., Tao, L., Yang, X., Huang, Y., Liu, C., Zheng, Z. 2018. Study of the thermal behavior, kinetics, and product characterization of biomass and lowdensity polyethylene co-pyrolysis by thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolysisGC/MS. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 133, 185-197.

Fig. 1. A schematic diagram of reaction system. Fig. 2. Temperature profiles of AC and SiC. Fig. 3. The yields of solid, liquid and gas on mass ratio. Fig. 4. Chemical compounds of co-pyrolysis bio-oil with different additives: (a) AC; (b) SiC.

Table 1

Characteristics of CV, WS, AC and SiC. Ultimate analyses (wt.%, dry

Proximate analyses (wt.%,

Ta HHV

basis)

dry basis)

H/

O/



Cc

Cc

×1

(MJ/ Moist

Volati

As

Fixed C

ure

les

0.66

71.63

C

h

47.

79.76

S

S

33.6

kg)

0.8

47.

6 6.6

1

3

1.7

0.5

7

3

1.6

0.7

<0.

9

3

1d

22.06 9

2

0.15

0

46.1

14.21 2

11.1

7 33

0.7 5.32

N

0-4

19.19 2

W

Ob

Carbona

8.5

V

H



18.42

3

0.5 A

80. 10.35

7.9

4.9

1.7

13.7

76.85

C

0.0 4.36

09

3

3

725.19





9

0.8 d

0.1 Si



















C





— 0.4 7d

a

calculated by difference (fixed carbon=100-moisture-ash-volatiles).

b

calculated by difference (O (%)=100-C-H-N-S-Ash).

c

Molar ratio.

d

Refs. (Salema et al., 2017), (Atwater & Wheeler, 2003), (Duan et al., 2016; Polaert et al., 2017),

respectively

Table 2 HHV of bio-oil and bio-char. Additive

AC

SiC

CV proportion (%)

0

30

50

70

100

0

30

50

70

HHV of bio-oil

29.3

24.8

15.0

24.7

19.9

28.6

25.9

17.9

24.3

(MJ/kg)

0

6

2

8

3

6

8

7

3

HHV of bio-char

28.0

27.4

27.1

25.3

24.8

31.8

23.0

22.7

23.0

(MJ/kg)

9

6

0

1

9

4

9

7

3

100

23.61

19.27

Highlights 

Co-pyrolysis of chlorella and sawdust was investigated.



Activated carbon had better temperature response to microwave than silicon carbide.



Aromatics in bio-oil improved by co-pyrolysis of sawdust and chlorella.



Microwave pyrolysis with activated carbon had higher gas and liquid yield.



High calorific bio-char was made by microwave-assisted pyrolysis of sawdust.