459
Joumnl of Molecular Structure, 114 (1984) 459-462 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
MID-,
FAR-INFRARED
AND
RAMAN
P.L.GOGGIN*
and
J.MINK3*
M-GAL,
SPECTRA
OF
URANYL
COMPLEXES
IN AQUEOUS
SOLUTIONS
'Etitvijs Lo&d University Department of General and Inorganic Chemistry, H-1445 Budapest (Hungary; 2 Department of Inorganic Chemistry, The University, Bristol 858 1TS (Gt.Britain) 3 Institute of Isotopes of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-1525 Budapest (Hungary)
ABSTRACT Vibrational Na3LU02F5
spectra
over
a range
after'water There
was
four
subtraction
for
aqueous
ligand,
can
constants
[UO2F]+
but
both
for
and
that
solution
some
and
water
[UO2Cl]*
monodentate
and
of UO2C104,
distances
were
but
complexes
The
bound
to [UO$ [U021
been
From
sulphate.
for
nor
of acetate
species
present
uranyl
solvated
'+_ 2+
established.
to bidentate
linkage
main
calculated
are
of H20
besidessolvated
have
neither
and
absorptions
molecules
bidentate
complexes.
to a monodentate
UO bond
residual
coordination,
featuresdo:notrefer
acetate
be ascribed
The
composition.
suggest
stretching
established
lution
obtained
of perchlorate
of weak
nitrate
dentate were
of solution
no evidence
ion formation The
been
, U02F2,[ Bu4N121U02C141 , UO2C12, U02(N0312, I Pr4NltU02(02CCH3)31 > [ Pr4Nl WO2(N03)31 , UO$O$CH&.
RbIU02(N03)31 UO2S0,
have
I, L NH4131U02F51
to mono-
to uranyl
in U02SD4
frequencies
so-
force
complexes.
INTRODUCTION The and
technical
especially
troscopy aqueous
can
difficulties in the
be used
solutions
attention.
in solid
to detect
of
of uranium,
vibrational
the its
spectroscopic
state
and
in studying
i-t-. are
of uranyl
Because
extraction
far
complex
of aqueous known
formations
in water
complexes
in the
infrared
of the
UOEf
salts
and
is a valuable
complexes
has guide
here.
been for
have
been for
interpreting
solutions
ment found ic ligand.
in solids after dissolution in water In this paper we report infrared and
The
persistance
Elsevier Science
Publishers
in the
of
cases
solutions. attracted
through videly many
mid
i-r-.
Rarran specStudies very
on
little
its role
in the
studied.
Detailed
of the
the nature
of
the coordination
uranyl the
salts species
environ-
depends on the nature of inorganRaman studies of uranyl salts.
*Present address: Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Niirnberg, Egerlandstr. 1, D-8520 Erlangen (F.R.G.)
0 1954
have
group
reported
in aqueous
0022-2860/84/$03.00
solutions
.In favorable
[l]
importance analysis
studied
well
B.V.
University
of Erlangen-
EXPERIMENTAL Infrared 7199a
spectra
Fourier
mini-cell
with
of aqueous
solutions
te effects. used
Krypton
be.given
AND most
results
fluoride
to reconcile the
1
than
Raman
spectra
1. From
bands spectra
in . agreement can
any
1106
UO2
sumrized
spectra
: INFRARED
(198 400
hitherto;
stretching
will AND
implv
with
the
Instruments
far
12 pm was
solvent
and
different
photon
was
used,
electroly-
systems.
counter
Model
One
detection.
52 Argon
ion or
a Jobin-Yvon-Ramanor
spectrometer,
using
Preparation
lasers.
of uranyl
the
HG-25
excitation
of compounds
Raman
somewhat Four
salts.
bands.
All
in Table
2. More
be
elsewhere
RAMAN
BANDS
all
from
will
The
, 253
s
160 b,w
two
available
complex
m (82.7 w,p) sh.
coordinated
U02
modes
U02
evi-
may
ac-
complete
SOLUTIONS OF
[C104]-
bending stretch or coordinated libration
modes
UF stretch
of [U02F]+ of.[U02F]+
diffi-
of aqueous
of the
ASSIGNMENT
in
not
SPECIES
not
U(OH,)S
._
modes
IN AQUEOUS
C
908
are
were
of acetate
discussion
131.
listed
frequencies
uranyl
of
formation
sulphate
types
COMPLEXES
U-OH2
380
et al.
systems
[2].
HYDRATED
vs,pja
and
solution
no evidence
of Brooker
stretching
acetate
detailed
OF URANYL
w
found
other
stronger
NO3
Free
in aqueous
was
studies
for
uranyl
given
complexes
of perchlorate
model.
w,b
Fluorides
for
two
APPROXIMATE
vs,'(874 w,dp),
spectra
Laboratories
with
(cm“) b
vs, 627
962.5
i.r.
with
be detected
simple
of dissolved
are
Perchlorates
an AgCl
For
instrument
Krypton-ion
indicated with
two
a
used
films.
Nicolet
of approximately
performed
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
experiments
monochromator
on fluorides
the
vibrational
TABLE
with
i-r.
to compensate
monochromator
interaction
cult
solutions
cell
Radiation
vibrational
to [U02]2'
with
for
recorded mid
[2].
in Table
1. Our
dent;in
were
other
and
the
24 urn liquid
employed
triple
double
Argon-
uranyl-anion
count
The
prominent
coordination
Table
were
All
DISCUSSION
summarized
Some
T-800
elsewhere
The
were
rrere Coherent
grating (DDR)
RESULTS
are
Model
ion lasers.'
Zeiss
12 or
measurements
sources
holographic Carl
solutions system.
a silicon-windowed
routines
Raman
a Coderg light
i-r.
approximately
-and subtraction
The
of-aqueous
transform
H20
461
Chlorides 962.5
d
vse
vsf
U02
asymmetric
956 222
w,b
UC1
stretch
UO3
stretches
Nitrates 148Ow,
1327p,
1037~
neither U02
,245m
(8725,~)
1538vs,
1468~s 1390m
930s,sh,
i
1144w,sh,
1047s
NO;
monodentate
86Ow,
261s
a Ran-an frequencies mol
are
dm O3 solution
UO,(ClO,),
+ LiCl;
or CS[UO~(NO~>~ (20°C)
CO
stretches
of bidentate
CO
stretches
of monodentate
SO stretches
208w,b
tion
nor
stretch
UO2 asymmetric
919vs
Sulphates
' 0.1
of coordinated
bidentate
h
Acetates
956vs,
[U02C1]'
modes
U-NO3
191w
1603m,
of
g 1409w,m,
961vs,
stretch
modes stretch
1 mol
dm-3
i-r.
of U02(02CCH3)2;
=
1:l;
of monodentate
of oxyanion
solution
' 0.5
mol
~~5 dm
NaN03 solution
for
[SO4]-
ligand
of U02(C104)2;
; d 1 mol dme3 uranium ’ U:Cl = 1:8; g 1 mol dme3
and_U02(C104)2
acetate
stretches
of Na3(U02F5]
e U:Cl
] for
b
in brackets;
U02 U-O
acetate
concentration
solhution
Ramn;
from
of U02(N03)2
Saturated
solu-
of U02S04.
REFERENCES 1 2 3 4
C.Carr and P.L. Goggin, J.Mol.Struct., 79 (1983) 261-265. P.L.Goggin, M.G?il and J-Mink, manuscript in preparation. M.M.Brooker, C-H. Huang and J.Sylwestrowicz, J.Inorg.Nucl.Chem., 1431-1440. L-H-Jones, Spectrochim.Acta 15 (1959) 409-411.
42
(1980)
STRETCH V3 962.5
STRETCH VI 874 871.5+ 872 866.5
-u0,(c104),
[U02(N03)jRb
uo2(No3)2
uo2c12
u"2F2
835 827
IUo2F5]Naq 908
(9'6)
919x
927
920.5*
262*
270*
261
268*
260
254
254
V2 253
u"P BENDING
6.646
6.770
6.776
6.925
6.835
7.063
7.281
!.292
7.333
7.418
7.414
.
K(UO)
-0.202
-0.200
-0.238
-0.213
-0.202
-0.199
-0.311
-0.110
-0.259
-0.254
-0.257
0.248
K(UO,UO)
0.285
0.303
0.283
0.298
0.281
0.268
0.268
.
H(OU0)
174.4
174.1
174.1
173.7
173.6
173.3
172.7
172.7
172,6
172.4
172.4
172.2
R(U0)' (pm)
* CALCULATED BY EXPRESSION OF REF.[4]
IN BRACKETS PREDICTED VALUES CALCULATED BY V, = 0.795 V3 - 107
+ FROM RAMAN SPECTRUM OF Cs SALT; * CH2C'12SOLUTION DATA; ** H20 SOLUTION OF U02(C104)t5 Li(O2CCH3);
833"
[Uo2F51[NH413
844
hJo2C141[N(C4Hg)4] 2
UO,(O,CCH,),**
[U02(02CCH,)~[N(C3H7)4](839)
956
860 853.5
uo2s04 (939)
944*
[uo,(No,),][N(C,~~,)~]873,862*
(956)
961
961
U02ASYM.
U02SYM.
COMPOUNDS
TABLE 2 : URANYL MODES (cm-') AND FORCE CONSTANTS (N cm-') OF SOLVATED URANYL ION
.