- Email: [email protected]
Mitral valve prolapse in the general population
Journal of the American College of Cardiology © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Published by Elsevier Science Inc.
Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 ISSN 0735-1097/02/$22.00 PII S0735-1097(02)02161-7
Echocardiography
Mitral Valve Prolapse in the General Population The Benign Nature of Echocardiographic Features in the Framingham Heart Study Lisa A. Freed, MD, FACC,*†‡ Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, SCM, FACC,*§㛳 Daniel Levy, MD, FACC,*‡㛳¶# Martin G. Larson, SCD,*㛳 Jane C. Evans, DSC,*㛳 Deborah L. Fuller, RDCS,* Birgitta Lehman, RDCS,* Robert A. Levine, MD, FACC†‡ Framingham and Boston, Massachusetts; and Bethesda, Maryland The aim of this study was to examine the echocardiographic features and associations of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) diagnosed by current two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria in an unselected outpatient sample. BACKGROUND Previous studies of patients with MVP have emphasized the frequent occurrence of echocardiographic abnormalities such as significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and left atrial (LA) enlargement that are associated with clinical complications. These studies, however, have been limited by the use of hospital-based or referral series. METHODS We quantitatively studied all 150 subjects with possible MVP by echocardiography and 150 age- and gender-matched subjects without MVP from the 3,491 subjects in the Framingham Heart Study. Based on leaflet morphology, subjects were classified as having classic (n ⫽ 46), nonclassic (n ⫽ 37), or no MVP. RESULTS Leaflet length, MR degree, and LA and left ventricular size were significantly but mildly increased in MVP (p ⬍ 0.0001 to 0.004), with mean values typically within normal range. Average MR jet area was 15.1 ⫾ 1.4% (mild) in classic MVP and 8.9 ⫾ 1.5% (trace) in nonclassic MVP; MR was severe in only 3 of 46 (6.5%) subjects with classic MVP, and LA volume was increased in only 8.7% of those with classic MVP and 2.7% of those with nonclassic MVP. CONCLUSIONS Although the echocardiographic characteristics of subjects with MVP in the Framingham Heart Study differ from those without MVP, they display a far more benign profile of associated valvular, atrial, and ventricular abnormalities than previously reported in hospitalor referral-based series. Therefore, these findings may influence the perception of and approach to the outpatient with MVP. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1298 –304) © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation OBJECTIVES
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) has been described as the most common cardiac valvular abnormality in industrialized countries (1) and the leading cause of mitral valve surgery for isolated mitral regurgitation (MR) (2). Previous studies have emphasized the frequent occurrence of echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with MVP, including thickened and elongated leaflets with important MR and left heart chamber enlargement. These abnormalities, in turn, have been associated with clinical complications in as many as 10% to 46% of patients in those series, including From the *National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts; †Cardiac Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and ‡Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Divisions of §Cardiology and 㛳Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ¶National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; and the #Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. This work was supported by NIH/NHLBI contract N01-HC-38038, NIH/NINDS 5-R01-NS-17950-16, by NIH grants HL38176, HL53702, K24 HL67434, by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and by the Roman W. DeSanctis Clinical Scholar Fund. We gratefully acknowledge the Hewlett-Packard Foundation Grant for upgrading our Hewlett Packard Ultrasound system to Sonos 1000 (Andover, Massachusetts). Manuscript received October 15, 2001; revised manuscript received May 30, 2002, accepted July 2, 2002.
congestive heart failure, mitral valve surgery, bacterial endocarditis, arrhythmias, and sudden death (3–19). Those studies, however, have been limited by the use of hospitalbased or highly selected referral samples more likely to have echocardiographic and clinical abnormalities, similar to the experience with referral populations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (20,21). This perception of disease severity has affected individuals receiving the diagnosis, increasing personal and professional anxiety concerning the risk of complications and the need for prophylaxis. A contrasting impression is that MVP is a common disorder (22–31), often affecting individuals who otherwise appear healthy (32,33). This impression, however, may relate to prior use of M-mode or two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiographic views nonspecific for the diagnosis of MVP (23,31,34 –38). Recent understanding of the threedimensional nonplanar shape of the mitral annulus (39 – 45) has allowed us to refine the 2-D echocardiographic criteria for MVP to minimize false positive diagnoses (46,47). To date, however, no study has applied these criteria to a community-based sample to characterize the echocardiographic manifestations of MVP. Therefore, this study examined the echocardiographic features of MVP as diag-
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Abbreviations and Acronyms 2-D ⫽ two-dimensional LA ⫽ left atrial/atrium LV ⫽ left ventricle/ventricular LVIDd ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in enddiastole LVIDs ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole MR ⫽ mitral regurgitation MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse
nosed by current 2-D echocardiographic criteria in an unselected outpatient sample, as provided by the Framingham Heart Study.
METHODS Study sample. The Framingham Heart Study was established in 1948 as a prospective epidemiologic cohort investigation. Offspring of the original cohort and the spouses of offspring were entered into a prospective study in 1971 (48,49). Subjects who participated in the fifth offspring examination (1991 to 1995) were the focus of this study. The examination protocol was approved by the Boston Medical Center Institutional Review Board, and all subjects gave informed consent. The study sample consisted of all 3,491 subjects at the fifth offspring examination (1,845 women, 1,646 men) with technically adequate 2-D echocardiograms (245 subjects were eliminated because of technically inadequate echocardiograms for evaluating the mitral valve). Of this cohort, five subjects had a history of mitral valve repair or replacement, four of whom had documented pathologies other than MVP (mitral stenosis, ischemic MR). Only one subject had mitral valve surgery (repair) for MVP. These subjects were excluded from echocardiographic analysis because the measured variables could have been altered by the surgical intervention. To ensure complete ascertainment of MVP, we examined the echocardiograms of all subjects who were previously identified as having possible leaflet displacement suggesting prolapse in any 2-D view or by M-mode at any study exam (offspring exams 2,4,5). This broad-net approach identified 518 subjects. First, we assessed the fifthexamination echocardiograms of these 518 subjects to identify those in whom approach of the leaflets toward the annulus or qualitative superior systolic mitral leaflet displacement warranted quantitative evaluation to determine whether prolapse was actually present. Cases identified in this way (n ⫽ 150) were paired with age- and gendermatched control subjects drawn from the fifth offspring exam who were initially coded as having no evidence of MVP. Echocardiograms of cases and control subjects were examined blinded to MVP status and clinical history. Echocardiographic methods. All subjects underwent standard 2-D echocardiograms with a commercially available system (Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000, Andover, Massachusetts) using a 2.5-MHz transducer. Images were recorded
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
1299
on videotape, including complete parasternal, apical, and subcostal views, and color Doppler to assess valvular regurgitation. All measurements were performed using a Sony Off-Line Cardiac Analysis System (Sum 1010, Sony, Park Ridge, New Jersey). Using current 2-D echocardiographic criteria based on the three-dimensional shape of the annulus and clinical correlations (14,39 – 47), the diagnosis of MVP was made by measurement of maximal mitral leaflet superior systolic displacement relative to the line connecting the annular hinge points. Displacement of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets was measured in the parasternal and apical long-axis views, which were scanned by tilting the transducer to visualize the medial, central, and lateral scallops of the posterior leaflet (14,39,40,46,47). Because the lateral scallop of the posterior leaflet is most difficult to evaluate from these views, and in order to ensure its complete assessment, its displacement was also measured in the apical four-chamber view (46,50); however, such displacement could always be confirmed in the long-axis scans. Mitral leaflet thickness in diastasis was measured as the leading to trailing edge of the thickest area of the midportion of the leaflet, excluding focal areas of thickness and chordae (4,14,46,51,52). Each leaflet was measured, and maximal thickness was used for categorization. On the basis of prior clinical and prognostic studies, subjects were classified as having classic MVP (displacement ⬎2 mm, thickness ⱖ5 mm) or nonclassic MVP (displacement ⬎2 mm, thickness ⬍5 mm) (4,5,14,46,47). Borderline degrees of displacement (ⱕ2 mm) have been shown to lack association with increased leaflet thickness, MR, left atrial (LA) enlargement, valve-related complications, or progression over 10 years and were not included as prolapse (46). Maximal mitral annular diameter was measured at endsystole as the length of the line connecting the midportion of the leaflet hinge points in the parasternal long-axis view (51). The lengths of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets were traced in diastasis in the parasternal long-axis view from their hinge points to the free edges along the middle of the leaflets, excluding the chordae (51). The degree of MR was assessed as maximal regurgitant jet area/LA area ratio in the parasternal and apical long-axis and apical four-chamber views (53). Trace, mild, moderate, and severe MR were classified on the basis of jet area/LA area ratios of ⬎0% to 10%, ⬎10% to 20%, ⬎20% to 40%, and ⬎40% (53). Three maximal end-systolic LA dimensions were measured: the anteroposterior diameter obtained in the parasternal long-axis view at the aortic leaflet insertion points; and the mediolateral and inferosuperior diameters obtained in the apical four-chamber view and passing through the midpoint of the visualized atrial area (46). Left atrial volume was calculated as the product of these dimensions ⫻ /6 to give the volume of an ellipsoid (46). Left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole (LVIDs) and left ventricular internal diameter in end-diastole (LVIDd) were measured in the
1300
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Table 1. Mitral Valve Features and Associated Echocardiographic Features of MVP
Maximal leaflet displacement (mm) Maximal leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Anterior leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Posterior leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Anterior leaflet length (mm) Posterior leaflet length (mm) Mitral annular diameter (mm) Mitral regurgitation (%) Mitral annular calcification† Papillary muscle tug Posterior wall motion
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217)
p Value*
3.8 ⫾ 1.0 5.6 ⫾ 0.1 5.0 ⫾ 0.1 5.6 ⫾ 0.1 23.9 ⫾ 0.4 15.0 ⫾ 0.2 34.5 ⫾ 0.4 15.1 ⫾ 1.4 (mild) 11 (20.4) 15 (33.0) 44 (95.4)
3.1 ⫾ 0.6 4.3 ⫾ 0.1 3.9 ⫾ 0.1 4.1 ⫾ 0.1 22.2 ⫾ 0.5 14.0 ⫾ 0.3 32.0 ⫾ 0.5 8.9 ⫾ 1.5 (trace) 7 (17.5) 11 (30.0) 36 (100)
⫺0.5 ⫾ 2.0 3.6 ⫾ 0.1 3.3 ⫾ 0.04 3.4 ⫾ 0.1 19.3 ⫾ 0.2 12.2 ⫾ 0.1 29.1 ⫾ 0.2 2.4 ⫾ 0.6 (trace) 11 (4.5) 1 (0.4) 60 (26.5)
NA NA NA NA 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Maximum leaflet displacement is expressed as an unadjusted mean ⫾ standard deviation. All other measurements (least squares means ⫾ standard errors) are adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index, except mitral annular diameter which was also adjusted for height. *p values compare classic MVP ⫹ nonclassic MVP versus no MVP. †Mitral annular calcification was considered significant if moderate or severe. d ⫽ diastole; MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse; NA ⫽ not applicable because measurements differ by group definition.
parasternal long-axis view below the mitral leaflet tips as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography (54). Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated as follows: ([LVIDd2 ⫺ LVIDs2]/LVIDd2) ⫻ 100 ⫹ 10% for a normal apex, as all subjects had a normal apex (55). All measurements, except jet and LA area, were made in the same view on two separate cardiac cycles that provided unambiguous identification of the structures, and the two values were averaged. No measurements were made on premature or post-premature atrial or ventricular beats. The intraobserver (L. A. F.) and interobserver (L. A. F. and R. A. L.) correlations for mitral leaflet displacement, leaflet thickness, and degree of MR in 20 subjects exceeded 0.97. Associated echocardiographic features. Other echocardiographic features associated with MVP that were assessed included mitral annular calcification/thickening, papillary muscle tug or superior traction, and exaggerated posterior wall motion. Mitral annular calcification was classified in the parasternal short-axis view as absent, mild (focal), moderate (calcification of one-third of the mitral annular ring), or severe (calcification of at least one-half of the mitral annular ring) (56). The classification of mitral annular calcification was confirmed qualitatively on the parasternal long-axis and apical four-chamber views for extent of calcification and thickening. Papillary muscle superior traction or tug was defined as exaggerated superior motion of the papillary muscle toward the mitral annulus during systole, in parallel with the superior leaflet displacement (57). The posterior mitral annulus and adjacent left ventricular (LV) wall were examined for exaggerated inward systolic motion in the parasternal and apical long-axis views. Statistical methods. Analysis of covariance (58) was used to test for differences between subjects with and without MVP on continuous echocardiographic variables. Least squares means and standard errors are presented. Logistic regression analysis (59) was used to test for differences between subjects with and without MVP in the dichotomous echocardiographic variables. Left atrial and LV chamber sizes, LA volume, and mitral annular diameter were
adjusted for age, gender, height, and body mass index. The following variables were adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index: mitral leaflet thicknesses and lengths, degree of MR, LV ejection fraction, mitral annular calcification, papillary muscle tug, and exaggerated posterior wall motion. All comparisons were made by pooling subjects with classic and nonclassic MVP and comparing the pooled sample with those without MVP. This was an a priori decision made because of the relatively small sample size of those with prolapse. A two-sided p value of ⬍0.05 was the criterion for statistical significance. All analyses were conducted using SAS (60) on a Sun Ultrasparc Workstation (Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, California).
RESULTS Diagnosis of MVP. By quantitative evaluation, 46 subjects had classic MVP and 37 had nonclassic MVP. The remaining subjects did not meet quantitative criteria for MVP, including all 150 matched subjects whose initial qualitative evaluation did not suggest MVP (61). Age and gender. The mean age was 56.7 ⫾ 1.5 years (gender-adjusted least squares mean ⫾ standard error) for those with classic MVP, 55.4 ⫾ 1.6 years for those with nonclassic MVP, and 54.7 ⫾ 0.2 years for those without MVP (p ⫽ 0.19). The age range for the overall sample was 26 to 84 years. The gender distribution among subjects with classic and nonclassic MVP versus those without MVP was similar; 60% of subjects with MVP were female versus 53% of those without MVP (p ⫽ 0.21) (61). Leaflet and annular measures. Echocardiographic features associated with MVP are reported in Table 1. Anterior mitral leaflet length was mildly increased in subjects with nonclassic and classic MVP compared with those without MVP (Table 1), but mean values did not exceed the range of 21 to 24 mm reported in the anatomic (62,63) or echocardiographic (64) literature for normal subjects. Posterior leaflet length was greater in those with MVP, with the average rising above the reported normal range of 12 to
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
1301
Figure 1. The distribution of mitral regurgitation severity among the subjects in the study. MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse.
14 mm only for the classic group. In addition, mitral annular diameter was increased in those with MVP. The subjects with MVP had a higher prevalence of significant mitral annular calcification than those without MVP. Papillary muscle tug or superior traction occurred almost exclusively in subjects with MVP. Exaggerated posterior LV wall motion occurred in almost all patients with MVP, but was also seen in 26.5% of those without MVP. MR. The extent of MR was significantly higher in subjects with versus those without MVP, but the average percent jet area was only 15.1 (mild MR, Table 1) in those with classic MVP and 8.9 (trace MR) in those with nonclassic MVP. In the classic group, only 3 of 46 subjects (6.5%) had severe MR by Doppler color flow mapping. There were no subjects with severe MR in the nonclassic group, and one, or 0.5%, in those without MVP. The vast majority of subjects were
only mildly affected: 70% of subjects in the classic group had no, trace, or mild MR, as did 86% of those with nonclassic MVP and 98% of those without MVP (Fig. 1). LA and LV measures. Adjusting for age, gender, height, and body mass index, LA anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters, LA volumes, and LVIDd were significantly but mildly higher in subjects with MVP compared with subjects without MVP (Table 2). However, the vast majority of subjects with MVP had dimensions within the range of normal with few rising above them (65,66) (Table 3). Indexing chamber dimensions for height did not cause substantive differences in the results. Left atrial size correlated with MR in the mediolateral (r ⫽ 0.22) and anteroposterior (r ⫽ 0.26) dimensions; LA anteroposterior diameter was increased in 4 of 24, or 17%, subjects with moderate to severe MR versus 5 of 276, or 1.8%, of those
Table 2. Features of LA and LV Chambers
LA diameter (ap) (cm) LA diameter (ml) (cm) LA diameter (is) (cm) LA volume (cm3) LVIDd (cm) LVIDs (cm) LV ejection fraction (%)
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217)
p Value*
3.29 ⫾ 0.04 3.98 ⫾ 0.07 4.83 ⫾ 0.08 33.6 ⫾ 1.0 4.63 ⫾ 0.04 2.92 ⫾ 0.04 70.0 ⫾ 0.9
3.09 ⫾ 0.05 3.77 ⫾ 0.07 4.57 ⫾ 0.09 28.3 ⫾ 1.1 4.40 ⫾ 0.05 2.78 ⫾ 0.05 69.4 ⫾ 1.0
3.00 ⫾ 0.02 3.61 ⫾ 0.03 4.70 ⫾ 0.04 27.0 ⫾ 0.5 4.40 ⫾ 0.02 2.78 ⫾ 0.02 69.8 ⫾ 0.4
0.0001 0.0001 0.99 0.0001 0.0038 0.03 0.84
All measurements (least squares means ⫾ standard errors) are adjusted for age, gender, height, and body mass index, except ejection fraction which was not adjusted for height. *p values compare classic MVP ⫹ nonclassic MVP versus no MVP. ap ⫽ anteroposterior; is ⫽ inferosuperior; LA ⫽ left atrial; LV ⫽ left ventricular; LVIDd ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-diastole; LVIDs ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole; ml ⫽ mediolateral; MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse.
1302
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Table 3. Proportion of Increased LA and LV Measures
Increased Increased Increased Increased
LA diameter (ap) (cm) LA diameter (ml) (cm) LA volume (cm3) LVIDd (cm)
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46) (%)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37) (%)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217) (%)
3 (6.5) 5 (11) 4 (8.7) 3 (6.5)
0 (0) 1 (2.7) 1 (2.7) 0 (0)
6 (2.8) 1 (0.5) 3 (1.4) 0 (0)
Reference values: LA diameter (ap) ⱕ 3.8 cm; LA diameter (ml) ⱕ 4.7 cm; LA volume ⱕ 46 cm3; LVIDd ⱕ 5.3 cm. Abbreviations as in Table 2.
with none, trace, or mild MR. Ejection fraction was not different among the groups.
DISCUSSION Mitral valve prolapse can be clearly identified by echocardiography in a community-based sample, with superior leaflet displacement and increases in leaflet thickness, leaflet length, and MR. Nevertheless, these echocardiographic features and associations, although significant, are relatively mild. Severe MR is uncommon, and the vast majority, even of those with thickened leaflets, have no, trace, or mild MR. Left atrial size is similarly only mildly increased in these subjects with MVP, with average values that lie within the normal range; atrial size lies above this range in only a small proportion of those with classic MVP and thickened leaflets. Leaflet length lies within or only slightly above the normal range described in anatomic and echocardiographic series in the classic group (62– 64) and is within the normal range in the nonclassic group. Anterior leaflet length lies well below the 29 mm associated with congestive heart failure and the 26 mm associated with sudden death in a recent autopsy series (15). Left ventricular dysfunction is absent, and mild LV dilation rarely present. Therefore, the MVP is a definable entity, but with relatively benign echocardiographic manifestations in a general outpatient population. Comparison with previous literature. Previous studies of MVP have often focused on echocardiographic abnormalities and their association with clinical complications (3–19). Tresch et al. (6), for example, found dilated LA and LV in 90% of patients with MVP requiring mitral valve repair. In a large series of subjects with MVP, Zuppiroli et al. (16) found a high likelihood of complications, including cardiac death, and mitral valve replacement from progressive MR, in patients with enlarged LA and LV. Studies emphasizing complications, however, have generally used hospital-based or referral samples, increasing the likelihood of finding echocardiographic and clinical abnormalities (16). A different picture emerges from this study of an unselected outpatient sample. The subjects with MVP in this population did, in fact, have echocardiographic abnormalities, consistent with prior studies (4,5,9,14,15,40,67). These findings, however, were typically mild, uncommonly exceeding the normal range or increasing to the levels seen in
patients with complications. (Only one patient in this cohort has needed mitral valve repair for important MR with atrial fibrillation.) Therefore, even when MVP is diagnosed with the more specific criteria currently used— which would be expected to enrich for patients with definite abnormalities—there is a relatively benign constellation of associated findings. As in the case with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, this reflects study design: studies at referral institutions suggest a frequently symptomatic disease with a high rate of complications, whereas eliminating such patient referral and selection biases in outpatient samples can dramatically change the perception of disease (20,21). Features associated with MVP. Mitral annular calcification occurred more frequently in Framingham subjects with MVP. It has been associated with both MR and MVP (68 –70) and ascribed to increased mitral leaflet stress related to abnormal motion. It should be noted that echogenic appearances are nonspecific for calcification (71), however, and may represent annular thickening related to the myxomatous process. Papillary muscle superior tug occurred almost exclusively in subjects with important leaflet displacement, as in the prior literature (57). Clinically, it has yet to be demonstrated that such traction increases the propensity for lethal arrhythmias, as it does experimentally (72). Exaggerated inward posterior wall motion has been previously reported (70) but is not well understood; one potential mechanism would be traction by mural or other chordae on the adjacent myocardium. These findings, especially the abnormal papillary muscle and myocardial motion, are currently of greatest value as visual cues to heighten the awareness of the echocardiographer to the possibility of MVP. Study limitations. Although the overall study sample was large, the total number of subjects with MVP was modest. Nevertheless, the purpose of the study was achieved, namely, to examine the echocardiographic features and associations of MVP in an unselected outpatient sample. Unlike studies of patients seeking medical attention for complications of MVP or concerns regarding it, this study seeks to characterize MVP in the community, which has not been well described; this difference in population can explain differences in the apparent severity of presentation. In addition, the sample was predominantly Caucasian and it is possible that the results may not be generalized to other ethnic and racial groups. This study was cross-sectional, and additional studies are exploring progression. Of note is the fact that the single individual with MVP who required surgical repair before the study was excluded from the analysis for LA and LV size because they were not available in a comparable unoperated state at the same time that other subjects were studied. This may slightly skew these dimensions. Finally, we used the jet/LA area ratio as the best available quantitative measure at the time the echoes were obtained (53). This single-frame measure may, for example, overestimate MR that is limited to late systole, compared with more recent quantitative and integrated assessments
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
(73). However, comparison with the routine semiquantitative grading done independent of this MVP study, which integrates multiple aspects of jet size over time in several views, showed no major over- or underestimation. Summary and clinical implications. We combined an unselected study sample and current 2-D echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of MVP to explore the echocardiographic features of MVP in the community. We found that although the subjects with MVP in the Framingham Heart Study are significantly different from those without MVP in the defining and classifying features of leaflet displacement and thickness, they display a far more benign profile of associated valvular, atrial, and ventricular abnormalities than previously reported in hospital- or referralbased series. This profile of echocardiographic abnormalities such as MR and LA enlargement, which is associated with clinical complications, establishes the perception of disease severity, and a low frequency may allay anxiety for the individual diagnosed with MVP in the general outpatient setting. The frequent presence of no or trace MR in subjects with MVP is also relevant in considerations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and in balancing its potential risks and benefits (74,75). As in studies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the common theme is emerging that the profile of disease in patients with severe symptoms and demonstrated complications is not applicable to most individuals diagnosed by screening or routine evaluation in the general population, whose findings are far more benign. Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Robert A. Levine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, 55 Fruit Street-VBK 508, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. E-mail: [email protected].
REFERENCES 1. Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, Kligfield P. Mitral valve prolapse: causes, clinical manifestations, and management. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:305–17. 2. Waller BF, Morrow AG, Maron BJ, et al. Etiology of clinically isolated, severe, chronic, pure mitral regurgitation: analysis of 97 patients over 30 years of age having mitral valve replacement. Am Heart J 1982;104:276 –88. 3. Mills P, Rose J, Hollingsworth J, Amara I, Craige E. Long-term prognosis of mitral valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1977;297:13–8. 4. Chandraratna PAN, Nimalasuriya A, Kawanishi D, Suncan P, Rosin B, Rahimtoola SH. Identification of the increased frequency of cardiovascular abnormalities associated with mitral valve prolapse by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:1283–5. 5. Nishimura RA, McGoon MD, Shub C, Miller FA, Ilstrup DM, Tajik AJ. Echocardiographically documented mitral valve prolapse: long term follow-up of 237 patients. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1305–9. 6. Tresch DD, Doyle TP, Boncheck LI, et al. Mitral valve prolapse requiring surgery: clinical and pathologic study. Am J Med 1985;78: 245–50. 7. Naggar CZ, Pearson WN, Seljan MP, Maddock LK, Masrof S, Elwood DJ. Frequency of complications of mitral valve prolapse in subjects aged 60 years and older. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:1209 –12. 8. Devereux RB, Hawkins I, Kramer-Fox R, et al. Complications of mitral valve prolapse: disproportionate occurrence in men and older patients. Am J Med 1986;81:751–8.
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
1303
9. Kolibash AJ, Kilman JW, Bush CA, Ryan JM, Fontana ME, Wooley CF. Evidence for progression from mild to severe mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:762–7. 10. Panidis IP, McAllister M, Ross J, Mintz GS. Prevalence and severity of mitral regurgitation in the mitral valve prolapse syndrome: a Doppler echocardiographic study of 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:975–81. 11. Duren DR, Beckler AE, Dunning AJ. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic mitral valve prolapse in 300 patients: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:42–7. 12. Wilcken DEL, Hickey AJ. Lifetime risk for patients with mitral valve prolapse of developing severe valve regurgitation requiring surgery. Circulation 1988;78:10 –4. 13. Devereux RB. Mitral valve prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1988;78:234 –6. 14. Marks AR, Choong CY, Sanfilippo AJ, Ferre M, Weyman AE. Identification of high-risk and low-risk subgroups of patients with mitral valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1031–6. 15. Farb A, Tang AL, Atkinson JB, McCarthy WF, Virmani R. Comparison of cardiac findings in patients with mitral valve prolapse who die suddenly to those who have congestive heart failure from mitral regurgitation and to those with fatal noncardiac conditions. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:234 –39. 16. Zuppiroli A, Rinaldi M, Kramer-Fox R, Favilli S, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Natural history of mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:1028 –32. 17. Stoddard MF, Prince CR, Dillon S, Longaker RA, Morris GT, Liddell NE. Exercise-induced mitral regurgitation is a predictor of morbid events in subjects with mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:693–9. 18. Malkowski MJ, Boudoulas H, Wooley CF, Guo R, Pearson AC, Gray PG. Spectrum of structural abnormalities in floppy mitral valve echocardiographic evaluation. Am Heart J 1996;132:145–51. 19. Reed D, Abbott RD, Smucker ML, Kaul S. Prediction of outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation: the importance of left atrial size. Circulation 1991;84:23–34. 20. Spirito P, Chiarella F, Carratino L, Berisso MZ, Bellotti P, Vecchio C. Clinical course and prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an outpatient population. N Engl J Med 1989;320:749 –55. 21. Maron BJ, Casey SA, Poliac LC, Gohman TE, Almquist AK, Aeppli DM. Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a regional United States cohort. JAMA 1999;281:650 –5. 22. Levy D, Savage D. Prevalence and clinical features of mitral valve prolapse. Am Heart J 1987;113:1281–90. 23. Markiewicz W, Stoner J, London E, Hunt SA, Popp RL. Mitral valve prolapse in one hundred presumably healthy young females. Circulation 1976;53:464 –73. 24. Procacci PM, Savran SV, Schreiter SL, Bryson AL. Prevalence of clinical mitral-valve prolapse in 1,169 young women. N Engl J Med 1976;294:1086 –8. 25. Chandraratna PAN, Vlahovich G, Kong Y, Wilson D. Incidence of mitral valve prolapse in one hundred clinically stable newborn baby girls: an echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1979;98:312–4. 26. Hickey AJ, Wolfers J, Wilcken DEL. Mitral valve prolapse: prevalence in an Australian population. Med J Aust 1981;1:31–3. 27. Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Devereux RB, et al. Mitral valve prolapse in the general population. I. Epidemiologic features: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1983;106:571–6. 28. Savage DD, Devereux RB, Garrison RJ, et al. Mitral valve prolapse in the general population. 2. Clinical features: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1983;106:577–81. 29. Wann LS, Grove JR, Hess TR, et al. Prevalence of mitral prolapse by two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy young women. Br Heart J 1983;49:334 –40. 30. Bryhn M, Persson S. The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in healthy men and women in Sweden. Acta Med Scand 1984;215:157–60. 31. Warth DC, King ME, Cohen JM, Tesoriero VL, Marcus E, Weyman AE. Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in normal children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1173–7. 32. Leatham A, Brigden W. Mild mitral regurgitation and the mitral prolapse fiasco. Am Heart J 1980;99:659 –64. 33. Motulsky AG. Sounding Board. Biased ascertainment and the natural history of diseases. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1196 –7.
1304
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
34. Sahn DJ, Wood J, Allen HD, Peoples W, Goldberg SJ. Echocardiographic spectrum of mitral valve motion in children with and without prolapse: the nature of the false positive diagnosis. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:422–31. 35. Markiewicz W, London E, Popp RL. Effect of transducer placement on echocardiographic mitral valve motion. Am Heart J 1978;96:555–6. 36. Barletta GA, Fantini F. Pansystolic mitral bowing without mitral valve prolapse. J Card Ultrasound 1984;3:147–58. 37. Sasaki H, Ogawa S, Handa S, Nakamura Y, Yamada R. Two dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse syndrome in presumably healthy young students. J Cardiogr 1982;12: 23–31. 38. Kriwisky M, Froom P, Gross M, Ribak J, Lewis BS. Usefulness of echocardiographically determined mitral leaflets motion for diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse in 17- and 18-year-old men. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:1149 –51. 39. Levine RA, Triulzi MO, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. The relationship of mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1987;75:756 –67. 40. Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo AJ, et al. Threedimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1989;80:589 –98. 41. Thomas JD, Vandervoot PM, Pu M, et al. Doppler/echocardiographic assessment of native and prosthetic heart valves: recent advances. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:S59 –63. 42. Pai RG, Tanimoto M, Jintapakorn W, Azevedo J, Pandian NG, Shah PM. Volume-rendered three-dimensional dynamic anatomy of the mitral annulus using a transesophageal echocardiographic technique. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:623–7. 43. Yamaura Y, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Okada Y, Yoshikawa J. Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of configuration and dynamics of the mitral annulus in patients fitted with an annuloplasty ring. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:43–7. 44. Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Jackson BM, et al. Distortions of the mitral valve in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1026 –31. 45. Komeda M, Glasson JR, Bolger AF, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic geometry of the normal canine mitral annulus and papillary muscles. Circulation 1996;94:II159 –63. 46. Levine RA, Stathogiannis E, Newell JB, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. Reconsideration of echocardiographic standards for mitral valve prolapse: lack of association between leaflet displacement isolated to the apical four chamber view and independent echocardiographic evidence of abnormality. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1010 –9. 47. Perloff JK, Child JS. Mitral valve prolapse: evolution and refinement of diagnostic techniques. Circulation 1989;80:710 –1. 48. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemiologic approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1951;41: 279 –86. 49. Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol 1979;110:281–90. 50. Shah PM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994;7:286 –93. 51. Weissman NJ, Pini R, Roman MJ, Kramer-Fox R, Andersen HS, Devereux RB. In vivo mitral valve morphology and motion in mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:1080 –8. 52. Louie EK, Langholz D, Macklin WJ, Wallis DE, Jacobs WR, Scanlon PJ. Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the contribution of intrinsic tissue thickness to the appearance of a thick mitral valve in patients with mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:465– 71. 53. Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, et al. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation 1987;75: 175–83.
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304 54. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358 –67. 55. Vuille C, Weyman AE. Left ventricle I. General considerations, assessment of chamber size and function In: Weyman AE, editor. Principles and Practice of Echocardiography. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1994;575– 624. 56. Cardiovascular Health Study Manual of Operations for Echocardiography Reading Centers. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, NIH, 1993:21. 57. Sanfilippo AJ, Harrigan P, Popovic AD, Weyman AE, Levine RA. Papillary muscle traction in mitral valve prolapse: quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:564 – 71. 58. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1988:102–43, 297–313. 59. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1989:25–76. 60. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes And Enhancements Through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1996: 317–24, 381– 490. 61. Freed LA, Levy D, Levine RA, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1–7. 62. Rusted IE, Scheifley CH, Edwards JE. Studies of the mitral valve. I. Anatomic features of the normal mitral valve and associated structures. Circulation 1952;6:825–31. 63. Chiechi MA, Lees M, Thompson R. Functional anatomy of the normal mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1956;32:378 –98. 64. Jiang L, Levine RA, King ME, Weyman AE. An integrated mechanism for systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on echocardiographic observations. Am Heart J 1987;113:633–44. 65. Triulzi MO, Gillam LD, Gentile F, Newell JB, Weyman AE. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: linear dimensions and chamber areas. Echocardiography 1984;1:403–26. 66. Triulzi MO, Wilkins GT, Gillam LD, Gentile F, Weyman AE. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: left ventricular volumes. Echocardiography 1985;2:153–69. 67. Pini R, Devereux RB, Greppi B, et al. Comparison of mitral valve dimensions and motion in mitral valve prolapse with severe mitral regurgitation to uncomplicated mitral valve prolapse and to mitral regurgitation without mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1988;62: 257–63. 68. Schott CR, Kotler MN, Parry WR, Segal BL. Mitral annular calcification. Arch Intern Med 1977;137:1143–50. 69. Mintz GS, Kotler MN, Segal BL, Parry WR. Two dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of patients with mitral insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 1979;44:670 –8. 70. Gilbert BW, Schatz RA, VonRamm OT, Behar VS, Kisslo JA. Mitral valve prolapse: two-dimensional echocardiographic and angiographic correlation. Circulation 1976;54:716 –23. 71. Nicolosi GL, Atkins F, Dunn M. Sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography in the assessment of valve calcification in mitral stenosis. Am Heart J 1979;98:171–5. 72. Gornick CC, Tobler HG, Pritzker MC, Tuna IC, Almquist A, Benditt DG. Electrophysiologic effects of papillary muscle traction in the intact heart. Circulation 1986;73:1013–20. 73. Thomas L, Foster E, Hoffman JIE, Schiller NB. The mitral regurgitation index: an echocardiographic guide to severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2016 –22. 74. Clemens JD, Ransohoff DF. A quantitative assessment of pre-dental antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with mitral valve prolapse. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:531–44. 75. Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. Endocarditis prophylaxis for patients with mitral valve prolapse. Am J Med 1984;76:711–7.
Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 ISSN 0735-1097/02/$22.00 PII S0735-1097(02)02161-7
Echocardiography
Mitral Valve Prolapse in the General Population The Benign Nature of Echocardiographic Features in the Framingham Heart Study Lisa A. Freed, MD, FACC,*†‡ Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, SCM, FACC,*§㛳 Daniel Levy, MD, FACC,*‡㛳¶# Martin G. Larson, SCD,*㛳 Jane C. Evans, DSC,*㛳 Deborah L. Fuller, RDCS,* Birgitta Lehman, RDCS,* Robert A. Levine, MD, FACC†‡ Framingham and Boston, Massachusetts; and Bethesda, Maryland The aim of this study was to examine the echocardiographic features and associations of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) diagnosed by current two-dimensional echocardiographic criteria in an unselected outpatient sample. BACKGROUND Previous studies of patients with MVP have emphasized the frequent occurrence of echocardiographic abnormalities such as significant mitral regurgitation (MR) and left atrial (LA) enlargement that are associated with clinical complications. These studies, however, have been limited by the use of hospital-based or referral series. METHODS We quantitatively studied all 150 subjects with possible MVP by echocardiography and 150 age- and gender-matched subjects without MVP from the 3,491 subjects in the Framingham Heart Study. Based on leaflet morphology, subjects were classified as having classic (n ⫽ 46), nonclassic (n ⫽ 37), or no MVP. RESULTS Leaflet length, MR degree, and LA and left ventricular size were significantly but mildly increased in MVP (p ⬍ 0.0001 to 0.004), with mean values typically within normal range. Average MR jet area was 15.1 ⫾ 1.4% (mild) in classic MVP and 8.9 ⫾ 1.5% (trace) in nonclassic MVP; MR was severe in only 3 of 46 (6.5%) subjects with classic MVP, and LA volume was increased in only 8.7% of those with classic MVP and 2.7% of those with nonclassic MVP. CONCLUSIONS Although the echocardiographic characteristics of subjects with MVP in the Framingham Heart Study differ from those without MVP, they display a far more benign profile of associated valvular, atrial, and ventricular abnormalities than previously reported in hospitalor referral-based series. Therefore, these findings may influence the perception of and approach to the outpatient with MVP. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1298 –304) © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation OBJECTIVES
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) has been described as the most common cardiac valvular abnormality in industrialized countries (1) and the leading cause of mitral valve surgery for isolated mitral regurgitation (MR) (2). Previous studies have emphasized the frequent occurrence of echocardiographic abnormalities in patients with MVP, including thickened and elongated leaflets with important MR and left heart chamber enlargement. These abnormalities, in turn, have been associated with clinical complications in as many as 10% to 46% of patients in those series, including From the *National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts; †Cardiac Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and ‡Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, Divisions of §Cardiology and 㛳Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; ¶National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; and the #Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. This work was supported by NIH/NHLBI contract N01-HC-38038, NIH/NINDS 5-R01-NS-17950-16, by NIH grants HL38176, HL53702, K24 HL67434, by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and by the Roman W. DeSanctis Clinical Scholar Fund. We gratefully acknowledge the Hewlett-Packard Foundation Grant for upgrading our Hewlett Packard Ultrasound system to Sonos 1000 (Andover, Massachusetts). Manuscript received October 15, 2001; revised manuscript received May 30, 2002, accepted July 2, 2002.
congestive heart failure, mitral valve surgery, bacterial endocarditis, arrhythmias, and sudden death (3–19). Those studies, however, have been limited by the use of hospitalbased or highly selected referral samples more likely to have echocardiographic and clinical abnormalities, similar to the experience with referral populations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (20,21). This perception of disease severity has affected individuals receiving the diagnosis, increasing personal and professional anxiety concerning the risk of complications and the need for prophylaxis. A contrasting impression is that MVP is a common disorder (22–31), often affecting individuals who otherwise appear healthy (32,33). This impression, however, may relate to prior use of M-mode or two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiographic views nonspecific for the diagnosis of MVP (23,31,34 –38). Recent understanding of the threedimensional nonplanar shape of the mitral annulus (39 – 45) has allowed us to refine the 2-D echocardiographic criteria for MVP to minimize false positive diagnoses (46,47). To date, however, no study has applied these criteria to a community-based sample to characterize the echocardiographic manifestations of MVP. Therefore, this study examined the echocardiographic features of MVP as diag-
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Abbreviations and Acronyms 2-D ⫽ two-dimensional LA ⫽ left atrial/atrium LV ⫽ left ventricle/ventricular LVIDd ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in enddiastole LVIDs ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole MR ⫽ mitral regurgitation MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse
nosed by current 2-D echocardiographic criteria in an unselected outpatient sample, as provided by the Framingham Heart Study.
METHODS Study sample. The Framingham Heart Study was established in 1948 as a prospective epidemiologic cohort investigation. Offspring of the original cohort and the spouses of offspring were entered into a prospective study in 1971 (48,49). Subjects who participated in the fifth offspring examination (1991 to 1995) were the focus of this study. The examination protocol was approved by the Boston Medical Center Institutional Review Board, and all subjects gave informed consent. The study sample consisted of all 3,491 subjects at the fifth offspring examination (1,845 women, 1,646 men) with technically adequate 2-D echocardiograms (245 subjects were eliminated because of technically inadequate echocardiograms for evaluating the mitral valve). Of this cohort, five subjects had a history of mitral valve repair or replacement, four of whom had documented pathologies other than MVP (mitral stenosis, ischemic MR). Only one subject had mitral valve surgery (repair) for MVP. These subjects were excluded from echocardiographic analysis because the measured variables could have been altered by the surgical intervention. To ensure complete ascertainment of MVP, we examined the echocardiograms of all subjects who were previously identified as having possible leaflet displacement suggesting prolapse in any 2-D view or by M-mode at any study exam (offspring exams 2,4,5). This broad-net approach identified 518 subjects. First, we assessed the fifthexamination echocardiograms of these 518 subjects to identify those in whom approach of the leaflets toward the annulus or qualitative superior systolic mitral leaflet displacement warranted quantitative evaluation to determine whether prolapse was actually present. Cases identified in this way (n ⫽ 150) were paired with age- and gendermatched control subjects drawn from the fifth offspring exam who were initially coded as having no evidence of MVP. Echocardiograms of cases and control subjects were examined blinded to MVP status and clinical history. Echocardiographic methods. All subjects underwent standard 2-D echocardiograms with a commercially available system (Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000, Andover, Massachusetts) using a 2.5-MHz transducer. Images were recorded
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
1299
on videotape, including complete parasternal, apical, and subcostal views, and color Doppler to assess valvular regurgitation. All measurements were performed using a Sony Off-Line Cardiac Analysis System (Sum 1010, Sony, Park Ridge, New Jersey). Using current 2-D echocardiographic criteria based on the three-dimensional shape of the annulus and clinical correlations (14,39 – 47), the diagnosis of MVP was made by measurement of maximal mitral leaflet superior systolic displacement relative to the line connecting the annular hinge points. Displacement of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets was measured in the parasternal and apical long-axis views, which were scanned by tilting the transducer to visualize the medial, central, and lateral scallops of the posterior leaflet (14,39,40,46,47). Because the lateral scallop of the posterior leaflet is most difficult to evaluate from these views, and in order to ensure its complete assessment, its displacement was also measured in the apical four-chamber view (46,50); however, such displacement could always be confirmed in the long-axis scans. Mitral leaflet thickness in diastasis was measured as the leading to trailing edge of the thickest area of the midportion of the leaflet, excluding focal areas of thickness and chordae (4,14,46,51,52). Each leaflet was measured, and maximal thickness was used for categorization. On the basis of prior clinical and prognostic studies, subjects were classified as having classic MVP (displacement ⬎2 mm, thickness ⱖ5 mm) or nonclassic MVP (displacement ⬎2 mm, thickness ⬍5 mm) (4,5,14,46,47). Borderline degrees of displacement (ⱕ2 mm) have been shown to lack association with increased leaflet thickness, MR, left atrial (LA) enlargement, valve-related complications, or progression over 10 years and were not included as prolapse (46). Maximal mitral annular diameter was measured at endsystole as the length of the line connecting the midportion of the leaflet hinge points in the parasternal long-axis view (51). The lengths of the anterior and posterior mitral leaflets were traced in diastasis in the parasternal long-axis view from their hinge points to the free edges along the middle of the leaflets, excluding the chordae (51). The degree of MR was assessed as maximal regurgitant jet area/LA area ratio in the parasternal and apical long-axis and apical four-chamber views (53). Trace, mild, moderate, and severe MR were classified on the basis of jet area/LA area ratios of ⬎0% to 10%, ⬎10% to 20%, ⬎20% to 40%, and ⬎40% (53). Three maximal end-systolic LA dimensions were measured: the anteroposterior diameter obtained in the parasternal long-axis view at the aortic leaflet insertion points; and the mediolateral and inferosuperior diameters obtained in the apical four-chamber view and passing through the midpoint of the visualized atrial area (46). Left atrial volume was calculated as the product of these dimensions ⫻ /6 to give the volume of an ellipsoid (46). Left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole (LVIDs) and left ventricular internal diameter in end-diastole (LVIDd) were measured in the
1300
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Table 1. Mitral Valve Features and Associated Echocardiographic Features of MVP
Maximal leaflet displacement (mm) Maximal leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Anterior leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Posterior leaflet thickness (d) (mm) Anterior leaflet length (mm) Posterior leaflet length (mm) Mitral annular diameter (mm) Mitral regurgitation (%) Mitral annular calcification† Papillary muscle tug Posterior wall motion
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217)
p Value*
3.8 ⫾ 1.0 5.6 ⫾ 0.1 5.0 ⫾ 0.1 5.6 ⫾ 0.1 23.9 ⫾ 0.4 15.0 ⫾ 0.2 34.5 ⫾ 0.4 15.1 ⫾ 1.4 (mild) 11 (20.4) 15 (33.0) 44 (95.4)
3.1 ⫾ 0.6 4.3 ⫾ 0.1 3.9 ⫾ 0.1 4.1 ⫾ 0.1 22.2 ⫾ 0.5 14.0 ⫾ 0.3 32.0 ⫾ 0.5 8.9 ⫾ 1.5 (trace) 7 (17.5) 11 (30.0) 36 (100)
⫺0.5 ⫾ 2.0 3.6 ⫾ 0.1 3.3 ⫾ 0.04 3.4 ⫾ 0.1 19.3 ⫾ 0.2 12.2 ⫾ 0.1 29.1 ⫾ 0.2 2.4 ⫾ 0.6 (trace) 11 (4.5) 1 (0.4) 60 (26.5)
NA NA NA NA 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Maximum leaflet displacement is expressed as an unadjusted mean ⫾ standard deviation. All other measurements (least squares means ⫾ standard errors) are adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index, except mitral annular diameter which was also adjusted for height. *p values compare classic MVP ⫹ nonclassic MVP versus no MVP. †Mitral annular calcification was considered significant if moderate or severe. d ⫽ diastole; MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse; NA ⫽ not applicable because measurements differ by group definition.
parasternal long-axis view below the mitral leaflet tips as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography (54). Left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated as follows: ([LVIDd2 ⫺ LVIDs2]/LVIDd2) ⫻ 100 ⫹ 10% for a normal apex, as all subjects had a normal apex (55). All measurements, except jet and LA area, were made in the same view on two separate cardiac cycles that provided unambiguous identification of the structures, and the two values were averaged. No measurements were made on premature or post-premature atrial or ventricular beats. The intraobserver (L. A. F.) and interobserver (L. A. F. and R. A. L.) correlations for mitral leaflet displacement, leaflet thickness, and degree of MR in 20 subjects exceeded 0.97. Associated echocardiographic features. Other echocardiographic features associated with MVP that were assessed included mitral annular calcification/thickening, papillary muscle tug or superior traction, and exaggerated posterior wall motion. Mitral annular calcification was classified in the parasternal short-axis view as absent, mild (focal), moderate (calcification of one-third of the mitral annular ring), or severe (calcification of at least one-half of the mitral annular ring) (56). The classification of mitral annular calcification was confirmed qualitatively on the parasternal long-axis and apical four-chamber views for extent of calcification and thickening. Papillary muscle superior traction or tug was defined as exaggerated superior motion of the papillary muscle toward the mitral annulus during systole, in parallel with the superior leaflet displacement (57). The posterior mitral annulus and adjacent left ventricular (LV) wall were examined for exaggerated inward systolic motion in the parasternal and apical long-axis views. Statistical methods. Analysis of covariance (58) was used to test for differences between subjects with and without MVP on continuous echocardiographic variables. Least squares means and standard errors are presented. Logistic regression analysis (59) was used to test for differences between subjects with and without MVP in the dichotomous echocardiographic variables. Left atrial and LV chamber sizes, LA volume, and mitral annular diameter were
adjusted for age, gender, height, and body mass index. The following variables were adjusted for age, gender, and body mass index: mitral leaflet thicknesses and lengths, degree of MR, LV ejection fraction, mitral annular calcification, papillary muscle tug, and exaggerated posterior wall motion. All comparisons were made by pooling subjects with classic and nonclassic MVP and comparing the pooled sample with those without MVP. This was an a priori decision made because of the relatively small sample size of those with prolapse. A two-sided p value of ⬍0.05 was the criterion for statistical significance. All analyses were conducted using SAS (60) on a Sun Ultrasparc Workstation (Sun Microsystems, Santa Clara, California).
RESULTS Diagnosis of MVP. By quantitative evaluation, 46 subjects had classic MVP and 37 had nonclassic MVP. The remaining subjects did not meet quantitative criteria for MVP, including all 150 matched subjects whose initial qualitative evaluation did not suggest MVP (61). Age and gender. The mean age was 56.7 ⫾ 1.5 years (gender-adjusted least squares mean ⫾ standard error) for those with classic MVP, 55.4 ⫾ 1.6 years for those with nonclassic MVP, and 54.7 ⫾ 0.2 years for those without MVP (p ⫽ 0.19). The age range for the overall sample was 26 to 84 years. The gender distribution among subjects with classic and nonclassic MVP versus those without MVP was similar; 60% of subjects with MVP were female versus 53% of those without MVP (p ⫽ 0.21) (61). Leaflet and annular measures. Echocardiographic features associated with MVP are reported in Table 1. Anterior mitral leaflet length was mildly increased in subjects with nonclassic and classic MVP compared with those without MVP (Table 1), but mean values did not exceed the range of 21 to 24 mm reported in the anatomic (62,63) or echocardiographic (64) literature for normal subjects. Posterior leaflet length was greater in those with MVP, with the average rising above the reported normal range of 12 to
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
1301
Figure 1. The distribution of mitral regurgitation severity among the subjects in the study. MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse.
14 mm only for the classic group. In addition, mitral annular diameter was increased in those with MVP. The subjects with MVP had a higher prevalence of significant mitral annular calcification than those without MVP. Papillary muscle tug or superior traction occurred almost exclusively in subjects with MVP. Exaggerated posterior LV wall motion occurred in almost all patients with MVP, but was also seen in 26.5% of those without MVP. MR. The extent of MR was significantly higher in subjects with versus those without MVP, but the average percent jet area was only 15.1 (mild MR, Table 1) in those with classic MVP and 8.9 (trace MR) in those with nonclassic MVP. In the classic group, only 3 of 46 subjects (6.5%) had severe MR by Doppler color flow mapping. There were no subjects with severe MR in the nonclassic group, and one, or 0.5%, in those without MVP. The vast majority of subjects were
only mildly affected: 70% of subjects in the classic group had no, trace, or mild MR, as did 86% of those with nonclassic MVP and 98% of those without MVP (Fig. 1). LA and LV measures. Adjusting for age, gender, height, and body mass index, LA anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters, LA volumes, and LVIDd were significantly but mildly higher in subjects with MVP compared with subjects without MVP (Table 2). However, the vast majority of subjects with MVP had dimensions within the range of normal with few rising above them (65,66) (Table 3). Indexing chamber dimensions for height did not cause substantive differences in the results. Left atrial size correlated with MR in the mediolateral (r ⫽ 0.22) and anteroposterior (r ⫽ 0.26) dimensions; LA anteroposterior diameter was increased in 4 of 24, or 17%, subjects with moderate to severe MR versus 5 of 276, or 1.8%, of those
Table 2. Features of LA and LV Chambers
LA diameter (ap) (cm) LA diameter (ml) (cm) LA diameter (is) (cm) LA volume (cm3) LVIDd (cm) LVIDs (cm) LV ejection fraction (%)
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217)
p Value*
3.29 ⫾ 0.04 3.98 ⫾ 0.07 4.83 ⫾ 0.08 33.6 ⫾ 1.0 4.63 ⫾ 0.04 2.92 ⫾ 0.04 70.0 ⫾ 0.9
3.09 ⫾ 0.05 3.77 ⫾ 0.07 4.57 ⫾ 0.09 28.3 ⫾ 1.1 4.40 ⫾ 0.05 2.78 ⫾ 0.05 69.4 ⫾ 1.0
3.00 ⫾ 0.02 3.61 ⫾ 0.03 4.70 ⫾ 0.04 27.0 ⫾ 0.5 4.40 ⫾ 0.02 2.78 ⫾ 0.02 69.8 ⫾ 0.4
0.0001 0.0001 0.99 0.0001 0.0038 0.03 0.84
All measurements (least squares means ⫾ standard errors) are adjusted for age, gender, height, and body mass index, except ejection fraction which was not adjusted for height. *p values compare classic MVP ⫹ nonclassic MVP versus no MVP. ap ⫽ anteroposterior; is ⫽ inferosuperior; LA ⫽ left atrial; LV ⫽ left ventricular; LVIDd ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-diastole; LVIDs ⫽ left ventricular internal diameter in end-systole; ml ⫽ mediolateral; MVP ⫽ mitral valve prolapse.
1302
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
Table 3. Proportion of Increased LA and LV Measures
Increased Increased Increased Increased
LA diameter (ap) (cm) LA diameter (ml) (cm) LA volume (cm3) LVIDd (cm)
Classic MVP (n ⴝ 46) (%)
Nonclassic MVP (n ⴝ 37) (%)
No MVP (n ⴝ 217) (%)
3 (6.5) 5 (11) 4 (8.7) 3 (6.5)
0 (0) 1 (2.7) 1 (2.7) 0 (0)
6 (2.8) 1 (0.5) 3 (1.4) 0 (0)
Reference values: LA diameter (ap) ⱕ 3.8 cm; LA diameter (ml) ⱕ 4.7 cm; LA volume ⱕ 46 cm3; LVIDd ⱕ 5.3 cm. Abbreviations as in Table 2.
with none, trace, or mild MR. Ejection fraction was not different among the groups.
DISCUSSION Mitral valve prolapse can be clearly identified by echocardiography in a community-based sample, with superior leaflet displacement and increases in leaflet thickness, leaflet length, and MR. Nevertheless, these echocardiographic features and associations, although significant, are relatively mild. Severe MR is uncommon, and the vast majority, even of those with thickened leaflets, have no, trace, or mild MR. Left atrial size is similarly only mildly increased in these subjects with MVP, with average values that lie within the normal range; atrial size lies above this range in only a small proportion of those with classic MVP and thickened leaflets. Leaflet length lies within or only slightly above the normal range described in anatomic and echocardiographic series in the classic group (62– 64) and is within the normal range in the nonclassic group. Anterior leaflet length lies well below the 29 mm associated with congestive heart failure and the 26 mm associated with sudden death in a recent autopsy series (15). Left ventricular dysfunction is absent, and mild LV dilation rarely present. Therefore, the MVP is a definable entity, but with relatively benign echocardiographic manifestations in a general outpatient population. Comparison with previous literature. Previous studies of MVP have often focused on echocardiographic abnormalities and their association with clinical complications (3–19). Tresch et al. (6), for example, found dilated LA and LV in 90% of patients with MVP requiring mitral valve repair. In a large series of subjects with MVP, Zuppiroli et al. (16) found a high likelihood of complications, including cardiac death, and mitral valve replacement from progressive MR, in patients with enlarged LA and LV. Studies emphasizing complications, however, have generally used hospital-based or referral samples, increasing the likelihood of finding echocardiographic and clinical abnormalities (16). A different picture emerges from this study of an unselected outpatient sample. The subjects with MVP in this population did, in fact, have echocardiographic abnormalities, consistent with prior studies (4,5,9,14,15,40,67). These findings, however, were typically mild, uncommonly exceeding the normal range or increasing to the levels seen in
patients with complications. (Only one patient in this cohort has needed mitral valve repair for important MR with atrial fibrillation.) Therefore, even when MVP is diagnosed with the more specific criteria currently used— which would be expected to enrich for patients with definite abnormalities—there is a relatively benign constellation of associated findings. As in the case with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, this reflects study design: studies at referral institutions suggest a frequently symptomatic disease with a high rate of complications, whereas eliminating such patient referral and selection biases in outpatient samples can dramatically change the perception of disease (20,21). Features associated with MVP. Mitral annular calcification occurred more frequently in Framingham subjects with MVP. It has been associated with both MR and MVP (68 –70) and ascribed to increased mitral leaflet stress related to abnormal motion. It should be noted that echogenic appearances are nonspecific for calcification (71), however, and may represent annular thickening related to the myxomatous process. Papillary muscle superior tug occurred almost exclusively in subjects with important leaflet displacement, as in the prior literature (57). Clinically, it has yet to be demonstrated that such traction increases the propensity for lethal arrhythmias, as it does experimentally (72). Exaggerated inward posterior wall motion has been previously reported (70) but is not well understood; one potential mechanism would be traction by mural or other chordae on the adjacent myocardium. These findings, especially the abnormal papillary muscle and myocardial motion, are currently of greatest value as visual cues to heighten the awareness of the echocardiographer to the possibility of MVP. Study limitations. Although the overall study sample was large, the total number of subjects with MVP was modest. Nevertheless, the purpose of the study was achieved, namely, to examine the echocardiographic features and associations of MVP in an unselected outpatient sample. Unlike studies of patients seeking medical attention for complications of MVP or concerns regarding it, this study seeks to characterize MVP in the community, which has not been well described; this difference in population can explain differences in the apparent severity of presentation. In addition, the sample was predominantly Caucasian and it is possible that the results may not be generalized to other ethnic and racial groups. This study was cross-sectional, and additional studies are exploring progression. Of note is the fact that the single individual with MVP who required surgical repair before the study was excluded from the analysis for LA and LV size because they were not available in a comparable unoperated state at the same time that other subjects were studied. This may slightly skew these dimensions. Finally, we used the jet/LA area ratio as the best available quantitative measure at the time the echoes were obtained (53). This single-frame measure may, for example, overestimate MR that is limited to late systole, compared with more recent quantitative and integrated assessments
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304
(73). However, comparison with the routine semiquantitative grading done independent of this MVP study, which integrates multiple aspects of jet size over time in several views, showed no major over- or underestimation. Summary and clinical implications. We combined an unselected study sample and current 2-D echocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of MVP to explore the echocardiographic features of MVP in the community. We found that although the subjects with MVP in the Framingham Heart Study are significantly different from those without MVP in the defining and classifying features of leaflet displacement and thickness, they display a far more benign profile of associated valvular, atrial, and ventricular abnormalities than previously reported in hospital- or referralbased series. This profile of echocardiographic abnormalities such as MR and LA enlargement, which is associated with clinical complications, establishes the perception of disease severity, and a low frequency may allay anxiety for the individual diagnosed with MVP in the general outpatient setting. The frequent presence of no or trace MR in subjects with MVP is also relevant in considerations regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and in balancing its potential risks and benefits (74,75). As in studies of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, the common theme is emerging that the profile of disease in patients with severe symptoms and demonstrated complications is not applicable to most individuals diagnosed by screening or routine evaluation in the general population, whose findings are far more benign. Reprint requests and correspondence: Dr. Robert A. Levine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, 55 Fruit Street-VBK 508, Boston, Massachusetts 02114. E-mail: [email protected].
REFERENCES 1. Devereux RB, Kramer-Fox R, Kligfield P. Mitral valve prolapse: causes, clinical manifestations, and management. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:305–17. 2. Waller BF, Morrow AG, Maron BJ, et al. Etiology of clinically isolated, severe, chronic, pure mitral regurgitation: analysis of 97 patients over 30 years of age having mitral valve replacement. Am Heart J 1982;104:276 –88. 3. Mills P, Rose J, Hollingsworth J, Amara I, Craige E. Long-term prognosis of mitral valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1977;297:13–8. 4. Chandraratna PAN, Nimalasuriya A, Kawanishi D, Suncan P, Rosin B, Rahimtoola SH. Identification of the increased frequency of cardiovascular abnormalities associated with mitral valve prolapse by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1984;54:1283–5. 5. Nishimura RA, McGoon MD, Shub C, Miller FA, Ilstrup DM, Tajik AJ. Echocardiographically documented mitral valve prolapse: long term follow-up of 237 patients. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1305–9. 6. Tresch DD, Doyle TP, Boncheck LI, et al. Mitral valve prolapse requiring surgery: clinical and pathologic study. Am J Med 1985;78: 245–50. 7. Naggar CZ, Pearson WN, Seljan MP, Maddock LK, Masrof S, Elwood DJ. Frequency of complications of mitral valve prolapse in subjects aged 60 years and older. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:1209 –12. 8. Devereux RB, Hawkins I, Kramer-Fox R, et al. Complications of mitral valve prolapse: disproportionate occurrence in men and older patients. Am J Med 1986;81:751–8.
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
1303
9. Kolibash AJ, Kilman JW, Bush CA, Ryan JM, Fontana ME, Wooley CF. Evidence for progression from mild to severe mitral regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1986;58:762–7. 10. Panidis IP, McAllister M, Ross J, Mintz GS. Prevalence and severity of mitral regurgitation in the mitral valve prolapse syndrome: a Doppler echocardiographic study of 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:975–81. 11. Duren DR, Beckler AE, Dunning AJ. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic mitral valve prolapse in 300 patients: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:42–7. 12. Wilcken DEL, Hickey AJ. Lifetime risk for patients with mitral valve prolapse of developing severe valve regurgitation requiring surgery. Circulation 1988;78:10 –4. 13. Devereux RB. Mitral valve prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation. Circulation 1988;78:234 –6. 14. Marks AR, Choong CY, Sanfilippo AJ, Ferre M, Weyman AE. Identification of high-risk and low-risk subgroups of patients with mitral valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1031–6. 15. Farb A, Tang AL, Atkinson JB, McCarthy WF, Virmani R. Comparison of cardiac findings in patients with mitral valve prolapse who die suddenly to those who have congestive heart failure from mitral regurgitation and to those with fatal noncardiac conditions. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:234 –39. 16. Zuppiroli A, Rinaldi M, Kramer-Fox R, Favilli S, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Natural history of mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:1028 –32. 17. Stoddard MF, Prince CR, Dillon S, Longaker RA, Morris GT, Liddell NE. Exercise-induced mitral regurgitation is a predictor of morbid events in subjects with mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:693–9. 18. Malkowski MJ, Boudoulas H, Wooley CF, Guo R, Pearson AC, Gray PG. Spectrum of structural abnormalities in floppy mitral valve echocardiographic evaluation. Am Heart J 1996;132:145–51. 19. Reed D, Abbott RD, Smucker ML, Kaul S. Prediction of outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic chronic mitral regurgitation: the importance of left atrial size. Circulation 1991;84:23–34. 20. Spirito P, Chiarella F, Carratino L, Berisso MZ, Bellotti P, Vecchio C. Clinical course and prognosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an outpatient population. N Engl J Med 1989;320:749 –55. 21. Maron BJ, Casey SA, Poliac LC, Gohman TE, Almquist AK, Aeppli DM. Clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a regional United States cohort. JAMA 1999;281:650 –5. 22. Levy D, Savage D. Prevalence and clinical features of mitral valve prolapse. Am Heart J 1987;113:1281–90. 23. Markiewicz W, Stoner J, London E, Hunt SA, Popp RL. Mitral valve prolapse in one hundred presumably healthy young females. Circulation 1976;53:464 –73. 24. Procacci PM, Savran SV, Schreiter SL, Bryson AL. Prevalence of clinical mitral-valve prolapse in 1,169 young women. N Engl J Med 1976;294:1086 –8. 25. Chandraratna PAN, Vlahovich G, Kong Y, Wilson D. Incidence of mitral valve prolapse in one hundred clinically stable newborn baby girls: an echocardiographic study. Am Heart J 1979;98:312–4. 26. Hickey AJ, Wolfers J, Wilcken DEL. Mitral valve prolapse: prevalence in an Australian population. Med J Aust 1981;1:31–3. 27. Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Devereux RB, et al. Mitral valve prolapse in the general population. I. Epidemiologic features: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1983;106:571–6. 28. Savage DD, Devereux RB, Garrison RJ, et al. Mitral valve prolapse in the general population. 2. Clinical features: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J 1983;106:577–81. 29. Wann LS, Grove JR, Hess TR, et al. Prevalence of mitral prolapse by two-dimensional echocardiography in healthy young women. Br Heart J 1983;49:334 –40. 30. Bryhn M, Persson S. The prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in healthy men and women in Sweden. Acta Med Scand 1984;215:157–60. 31. Warth DC, King ME, Cohen JM, Tesoriero VL, Marcus E, Weyman AE. Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse in normal children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;5:1173–7. 32. Leatham A, Brigden W. Mild mitral regurgitation and the mitral prolapse fiasco. Am Heart J 1980;99:659 –64. 33. Motulsky AG. Sounding Board. Biased ascertainment and the natural history of diseases. N Engl J Med 1978;298:1196 –7.
1304
Freed et al. Echocardiographic Features of MVP
34. Sahn DJ, Wood J, Allen HD, Peoples W, Goldberg SJ. Echocardiographic spectrum of mitral valve motion in children with and without prolapse: the nature of the false positive diagnosis. Am J Cardiol 1977;39:422–31. 35. Markiewicz W, London E, Popp RL. Effect of transducer placement on echocardiographic mitral valve motion. Am Heart J 1978;96:555–6. 36. Barletta GA, Fantini F. Pansystolic mitral bowing without mitral valve prolapse. J Card Ultrasound 1984;3:147–58. 37. Sasaki H, Ogawa S, Handa S, Nakamura Y, Yamada R. Two dimensional echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse syndrome in presumably healthy young students. J Cardiogr 1982;12: 23–31. 38. Kriwisky M, Froom P, Gross M, Ribak J, Lewis BS. Usefulness of echocardiographically determined mitral leaflets motion for diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse in 17- and 18-year-old men. Am J Cardiol 1987;59:1149 –51. 39. Levine RA, Triulzi MO, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. The relationship of mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1987;75:756 –67. 40. Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo AJ, et al. Threedimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1989;80:589 –98. 41. Thomas JD, Vandervoot PM, Pu M, et al. Doppler/echocardiographic assessment of native and prosthetic heart valves: recent advances. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:S59 –63. 42. Pai RG, Tanimoto M, Jintapakorn W, Azevedo J, Pandian NG, Shah PM. Volume-rendered three-dimensional dynamic anatomy of the mitral annulus using a transesophageal echocardiographic technique. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:623–7. 43. Yamaura Y, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, Okada Y, Yoshikawa J. Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of configuration and dynamics of the mitral annulus in patients fitted with an annuloplasty ring. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:43–7. 44. Gorman JH 3rd, Gorman RC, Jackson BM, et al. Distortions of the mitral valve in acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:1026 –31. 45. Komeda M, Glasson JR, Bolger AF, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic geometry of the normal canine mitral annulus and papillary muscles. Circulation 1996;94:II159 –63. 46. Levine RA, Stathogiannis E, Newell JB, Harrigan P, Weyman AE. Reconsideration of echocardiographic standards for mitral valve prolapse: lack of association between leaflet displacement isolated to the apical four chamber view and independent echocardiographic evidence of abnormality. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1010 –9. 47. Perloff JK, Child JS. Mitral valve prolapse: evolution and refinement of diagnostic techniques. Circulation 1989;80:710 –1. 48. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemiologic approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1951;41: 279 –86. 49. Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families: the Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol 1979;110:281–90. 50. Shah PM. Echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994;7:286 –93. 51. Weissman NJ, Pini R, Roman MJ, Kramer-Fox R, Andersen HS, Devereux RB. In vivo mitral valve morphology and motion in mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:1080 –8. 52. Louie EK, Langholz D, Macklin WJ, Wallis DE, Jacobs WR, Scanlon PJ. Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of the contribution of intrinsic tissue thickness to the appearance of a thick mitral valve in patients with mitral valve prolapse. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:465– 71. 53. Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Hsiung MC, et al. Color Doppler assessment of mitral regurgitation with orthogonal planes. Circulation 1987;75: 175–83.
JACC Vol. 40, No. 7, 2002 October 2, 2002:1298–304 54. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989;2:358 –67. 55. Vuille C, Weyman AE. Left ventricle I. General considerations, assessment of chamber size and function In: Weyman AE, editor. Principles and Practice of Echocardiography. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1994;575– 624. 56. Cardiovascular Health Study Manual of Operations for Echocardiography Reading Centers. Bethesda, MD: NHLBI, NIH, 1993:21. 57. Sanfilippo AJ, Harrigan P, Popovic AD, Weyman AE, Levine RA. Papillary muscle traction in mitral valve prolapse: quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:564 – 71. 58. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 1988:102–43, 297–313. 59. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1989:25–76. 60. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT Software: Changes And Enhancements Through Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc., 1996: 317–24, 381– 490. 61. Freed LA, Levy D, Levine RA, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of mitral-valve prolapse. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1–7. 62. Rusted IE, Scheifley CH, Edwards JE. Studies of the mitral valve. I. Anatomic features of the normal mitral valve and associated structures. Circulation 1952;6:825–31. 63. Chiechi MA, Lees M, Thompson R. Functional anatomy of the normal mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1956;32:378 –98. 64. Jiang L, Levine RA, King ME, Weyman AE. An integrated mechanism for systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on echocardiographic observations. Am Heart J 1987;113:633–44. 65. Triulzi MO, Gillam LD, Gentile F, Newell JB, Weyman AE. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: linear dimensions and chamber areas. Echocardiography 1984;1:403–26. 66. Triulzi MO, Wilkins GT, Gillam LD, Gentile F, Weyman AE. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: left ventricular volumes. Echocardiography 1985;2:153–69. 67. Pini R, Devereux RB, Greppi B, et al. Comparison of mitral valve dimensions and motion in mitral valve prolapse with severe mitral regurgitation to uncomplicated mitral valve prolapse and to mitral regurgitation without mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1988;62: 257–63. 68. Schott CR, Kotler MN, Parry WR, Segal BL. Mitral annular calcification. Arch Intern Med 1977;137:1143–50. 69. Mintz GS, Kotler MN, Segal BL, Parry WR. Two dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of patients with mitral insufficiency. Am J Cardiol 1979;44:670 –8. 70. Gilbert BW, Schatz RA, VonRamm OT, Behar VS, Kisslo JA. Mitral valve prolapse: two-dimensional echocardiographic and angiographic correlation. Circulation 1976;54:716 –23. 71. Nicolosi GL, Atkins F, Dunn M. Sensitivity and specificity of echocardiography in the assessment of valve calcification in mitral stenosis. Am Heart J 1979;98:171–5. 72. Gornick CC, Tobler HG, Pritzker MC, Tuna IC, Almquist A, Benditt DG. Electrophysiologic effects of papillary muscle traction in the intact heart. Circulation 1986;73:1013–20. 73. Thomas L, Foster E, Hoffman JIE, Schiller NB. The mitral regurgitation index: an echocardiographic guide to severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2016 –22. 74. Clemens JD, Ransohoff DF. A quantitative assessment of pre-dental antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with mitral valve prolapse. J Chronic Dis 1984;37:531–44. 75. Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. Endocarditis prophylaxis for patients with mitral valve prolapse. Am J Med 1984;76:711–7.