Journal of Electrostatics, 7 (1979) 283--291 © Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam -- Printed in The Netherlands
V A R I A T I O N S OF P H O T O I N J E C T E D
MOBILITY
CHARGE
CARRIERS
283
IN
LIQUID SULFUR*
Donald H. Baird GTE Laboratories,
Inc., Waltham, MA 02154 U.S.A.
ABSTRACT Drift m o b i l i t y m e a s u r e m e n t s on electrons p h o t o g e n e r a t e d in liquid sulfur in the low v i s c o s i t y state have been extended to high electric field strengths and to large c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of injected carriers.
M o b i l i t i e s c a l c u l a t e d in the usual way from the
results at m o d e r a t e injection levels are in agreement w i t h the values r e p o r t e d by Ghosh and Spear
(ref. i).
They are found to be
i n d e p e n d e n t of field s t r e n g t h to at least 75 kV/cm.
The data at
low i n j e c t i o n levels also provide e v i d e n c e of the o c c u r r e n c e of e l e c t r o n trapping and release processes, used.
At high injection levels,
even in the p u r e s t sulfur
current amplitudes were o b s e r v e d
during the carrier drift time which were too large to be c o m p a t i b l e with the carrier v e l o c i t i e s o b s e r v e d at lower injection levels. This suggests that the i n t r o d u c t i o n of large excess carrier conc e n t r a t i o n s into liquid sulfur can increase the e f f e c t i v e mobility.
INTRODUCTION Studies by Ghosh and Spear
(ref. i) of carrier transport in
liquid sulfur at m o d e r a t e electric field strengths have indicated that the t r a n s p o r t process
is p r i m a r i l y e l e c t r o n i c and involves an
i n t e r m o l e c u l a r h o p p i n g mechanism.
Recently,
Proud and A u b o r n
(ref. 2) have i n v e s t i g a t e d the e l e c t r i c a l c o n d u c t i v i t y at high fields where they o b s e r v e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c n o n l i n e a r i t i e s p r e S r e a k d o w n range. ities,
in the
To assist in u n d e r s t a n d i n g these n o n l i n e a r -
it appeared of interest to extend the drift m o b i l i t y
measurements
into the high field range.
This paper p r e s e n t s
*Work s u p p o r t e d in part by Office of Naval Research under C o n t r a c t No. N00014-74-0215.
284 the results
of this e x t e n s i o n
the d r i f t b e h a v i o r
together
in the p r e s e n c e
with
observations
of large
made
concentrations
of
of injected
carriers.
EXPERIMENTAL
METHODS
The m e a s u r e m e n t flight
of c a r r i e r s
electrodes. trode
technique
photoinjected
The cell used
through w h i c h
semitransparent pulsed
xenon
entirely
absorbed
imity of the p h o t o e x c i t e d Emphasis
was p r i m a r i l y
electrons. was
Therefore,
the cathode
excitation A reentrant eration
steel.
fur was m a i n t a i n e d a small
vertical
was m o n i t o r e d at the level
high
fields.
an argon
range of 120 ° to 150°C,
i.e.,
~
ELECT~~
TRANSPAREN'I"kL~:L ~
i.
Photoconductivity
followed
the cell.
and p e r m i t t e d
electrode,
The
was
liquid
The cell was h e a t e d
employed
in the low v i s c o s i t y
region
op-
which
separation,
to the o u t s i d e
cell - schematic.
of
electrode
the optical
across
of Pyrex.
The t e m p e r a t u r e s
LFUR
prox-
ensured.
tube and the sulfur
LIGHT PULSE Fig.
Ultraviolet
suitable
behavior
breakdown
HIGH < VOLTAGE
almost
was
The o p p o s i n g
fastened
of a thin
conduction
of e l e c t r o n s
sulfur.
STAINLESS STEEL ~
lamp output.
in the e l e c t r o d e
glass
The elec-
source was a
the t r a n s p a r e n t
atmosphere.
a thermocouple
of the electrode.
light
and thus
pulse which
surface
variation
nichrome°wrapped
with
of t h e
The body of the cell was under
The
of the sulfur
the d r i f t
i.
consisted
of the sulfur was
experiments,
eliminated
to p r o v i d e
in Fig.
to the e l e c t r o d e
the current
to m o n i t o r
at the d e s i r e d
of stainless
carriers
in m o s t
cell d e s i g n
could be m o v e d
portion
in liquid
on m e a s u r e m e n t
so that
served
schematically
The p h o t o r e s p o n s e
to the u l t r a v i o l e t
of the time-of-
light p u l s e p a s s e d
film on fused quartz.
lamp.
is h i g h l y
determination
at one of a pair of plane p a r a l l e l
is shown
the e x c i t i n g
platinum
flash
due
radiation
involved
sulin
temperature
of the cell were
in the
of liquid
285
The sulfur was K o c h - L i g h t material, respect to m e t a l l i c impurities. stantial amounts
specified as 99.999% pure w i t h
However,
of o r g a n i c contamination.
to d e t e r i o r a t e on being m a i n t a i n e d
it was found to contain subAs a result,
v a c u u m d i s t i l l a t i o n removed p a r t i c u l a t e contamination. w e r e an increase in conductivity, drift m o b i l i t y experiment, high fields.
samples tended
in the liquid state, even after a The symptoms
a p o o r l y defined transit time in the
and an increased tendency to break down at
These are thought to have been due to c a r b o n i z a t i o n of
the organic material, sulfur molecules.
p o s s i b l y w i t h i n c o r p o r a t i o n of carbon into the
To m i n i m i z e these effects,
of m u l t i p l e d i s t i l l a t i o n s ,
a p r o c e d u r e was adopted
the last with p a s s a g e of the sulfur vapor
through a furnace tube at 1000°C
(ref. 3).
M a t e r i a l so treated tended
to show i m p r o v e d stability of e l e c t r i c a l p r o p e r t i e s and better defined transit time data.
Some of this m a t e r i a l was m a i n t a i n e d
in the liquid
state for many days w i t h o u t showing deterioration.
RESULTS AT LOW INJECTION LEVELS At s u f f i c i e n t l y low light levels, the space charge due to the injected carriers
is too small to p e r t u r b the applied field.
Then,
ideally,
the injected carriers should c o n s t i t u t e a thin sheet d r i f t i n g at constant v e l o c i t y in a u n i f o r m field.
This will give rise to a c o n s t a n t
current in the e x t e r n a l circuit which will end a b r u p t l y w h e n they reach the o p p o s i n g electrode.
Thus in this idealized case,
r e c t a n g u l a r c u r r e n t pulse as illustrated by curve
the result is a
(a) in Fig.
the r e l a t i v e l y high v o l t a g e s of the p r e s e n t experiments,
2.
Under
one would ex-
pect the spreading effects of carrier d i f f u s i o n on the trailing edge of such a pulse to be very small.
io
(a)
t Z u,i cc r.J
t 0
TIME
Fig. 2. P h o t o c u r r e n t vs. time after optical pulse. (a) Idealized: n e g l i g i b l e space charge and no carrier trapping. (b) Typical e x p e r i m e n t a l result.
286
The o b s e r v e d
shapes
this r e c t a n g u l a r After
value.
circuitry,
trations current number
during
the pulse
is reached
anode.
The
time
undergone
case of the trappin g tive
occurs
liquid
to,
which
decay
carriers
through when
probably
trapping
a temporary
trapped
the light pulse
current
to c o n t r i b u t e
appreciably
in terms
and release.
The
arrive
free.
at the is
which
long current in traps. the process
to the formation
of
of
region.
and this b r e a k
time
one,
state
few electrons
transit.
of a p o s i t i v e
to, an
in
and the number
significant
corresponds
time,
3 contains
in the e f f e c t i v e
system with which we are dealing,
an e l e c t r o n
constant
can be given
the c o n s t a n t
their
of the
At the low concen-
the first electrons
spent
behavior.
is due to the trapping
until
of the r e l a t i v e l y
during have
ion or the n e u t r a l i z a t i o n
slow-moving
type.
from
that the v a r i a t i o n s
of e l e c t r o n
the number
between
time,
no t r a p p i n g
is due to electrons
Fig.
by v a r i a t i o n s
the initial
between
interval
to the transit
zero.
of this
the p r o c e s s e s
is m a i n t a i n e d
in the curve
to an e s s e n t i a l l y
a rather w e l l - d e f i n e d
it is p r o b a b l e
free p h o t o e x c i t e d
equilibrium
The break
pulse
the typical
type of i n t e r p r e t a t i o n
to this mechanism,
equilibrium
2 shows
toward
are caused
This
involving
the o r i g i n a l l y
have
charge,
are very d i f f e r e n t
by the time constants
a decay
until
to drop
trace of a current
of electrons.
According
limited
follows
begins
of injected
of a m e c h a n i s m
equal
there
pulses
(b) of Fig.
rise,
is m a i n t a i n e d
the current
oscilloscope
Curve
current
This value
at w h i c h
This
form.
the initial
detecting
of the current
tail
In the of
of a nega-
the ion being
too
to the current.
I.s[F 1.0
- -
- -
- -
--7
l
i/i o
0.5
L
io
= 57 n A
I
to
= 5 . 5 ms
E
= 34 kV/cm
~ " k
~
0.056
0
L 0
0.5
I 1.0
1.5
2.0
t/t o
Fig. 3. P h o t o c u r r e n t pulse for low injection level (qo = 3.1 × 10-10C). Dashed curve: c a l c u l a t e d pulse including space charge effects (ref. 4).
287
If this m e c h a n i s m it follows
that the time c o n s t a n t s
release
processes
If they
are longer
and the current very
short,
course
is r e s p o n s i b l e
than
transit
not be evident.
samples
which
The
this,
p u l s e will
t o will
trapping
w here
electrons
approximate will
in such
with
will
This break
current
not be t r a p p e d one.
trapping
in fact,
suggesting
and
of the transit
poorly
time.
at all
If they are events
and the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c is,
waveforms,
the t r a p p i n g
the i d e a l i z e d
undergo many
are not well p u r i f i e d
in the
break
defined
an increased
at
in
rate of
samples.
type of current
pulse One
observed is given
here may be c o n s i d e r e d in the usual w a y
to define
in terms of t o by: (1)
o L is the e l e c t r o n
In terms
of the m o d e l
untrapped
electrons.
i ° = qo/to cuit
most
of the cell,
two types of mobility. L P - Et
associated
m u s t be of the order of m a g n i t u d e
then all c a r r i e r s
of their
for the o b s e r v e d
separation
discussed Where
and E the e l e c t r i c
above,
is the current w h i c h w o u l d have
mobility,
which
represents
takes
flowed
of
charge,
in the e x t e r n a l
had occurred.
into a c c o u n t
strength.
the m o b i l i t y
qo is the total p h o t o i n j e c t e d
for the time t o if no t r a p p i n g
an average
this
field
cir-
We m a y also d e f i n e
the time spent
in traps,
as:
= P(ic/i o) where
(2)
i c is the c o n s t a n t
part of the c u r r e n t
pulse.
of t o were m e a s u r a b l e , 0.7 with
rather
shapes were
field
strengths
1.33
sample,
of t
values
observed
obtained
and values
in conductivity.
vs.
samples
for w h i c h
up to 75 kV/cm,
x 10 -2 cm and the cell
rocal
In pure
found
latter
in the range
for a given
field
of transit
sample
values 0.3 to
indepen-
temperature
strength
given
120°C.
in Fig.
the results
line,
x 10 -4 cm2V-is -I,
found by Ghosh
and Spear
current
field
These
for
spacing was
The p l o t of the recip-
4 shows no e v i d e n c e
correspond
i).
0.4,
to show s u b s t a n t i a l
strength.
As
of
indi-
to a free e l e c t r o n
in s a t i s f a c t o r y
(ref.
about
time d e t e r m i n e d
high
The i n t e r e l e c t r o d e
up to the highest
values
the
in w h i c h w e l l - d e f i n e d
sufficiently
cated by the solid of 1.13
during
this ratio was
o appreciable nonlinearity
mobility
flowing
strength.
On a p a r t i c u l a r pulse
of current
the ratio ~/~ has been
consistent
dent of the field
nonlinearities
value
agreement
results
with
indicate
the that
288
the nonlinearities originate
in conduction
in variations
in liquid sulfur at high fields do not
in carrier mobility.
m
80
o
60--
o
E
(kV/cm) 40
20-
iy
0
P = 1.13 X 10 - 4 cm2/V-s
1
I
200
400 1/t ° ($-1)
I
600
Fig. 4. Reciprocal of electron transit time vs. field strength. Electrode separation: 1.33 × 10 -2 cm. Temperature: 120°C. RESULTS AT HIGH INJECTION LEVELS When the intensity of the optical pulse is increased quantity
of injected charge,
the electric
and with it the
effects due to space charge p e r t u r b a t i o n
field are to be expected.
The total injected charge,
is given by the time integral of the current pulse.
It determines
of
qo' the
"self-field"
Eq = qo/eA where area.
(3)
e is the dielectric
constant of liquid sulfur and A the electrode
The extent of the space charge p e r t u r b a t i o n
ratio Eq/E.
E is the average electric
is governed by the
field strength,
= Va/L
(4)
where V a is the applied voltage.
The theory of space charge effects on
the present type of experiment has been developed by Papadakis The results
in the preceding
where E q / E << 1 so that space charge effects are negligible. loscope trace in Fig.
(ref. 4).
section were obtained under conditions The oscil-
3 shows a pulse recorded under such conditions.
289
The solid curve in the graph gives the same data w i t h the time normalized to t o and the current to i o, w h i l e the d a s h e d curve is that calculated using Papadakis'
theory.
At this low i n j e c t i o n level,
a p p r o x i m a t e s closely a r e c t a n g u l a r pulse, space charge free case. 3.1 × 10-IOc. By c o m p a r i s o n Fig.
the idealized shape of the
The q u a n t i t y of injected charge here was
5 shows the result of i n c r e a s i n g the injected
charge to 3.6 x 10-9C with other c o n d i t i o n s the same. level,
this
At this injection
the effect of the space charge in the absence of t r a p p i n g should
be p r o n o u n c e d as shown by the dashed t h e o r e t i c a l curve.
The e x p e r i m e n -
tal and c a l c u l a t e d curves under these c o n d i t i o n s bear a q u a l i t a t i v e resemblance.
A s s u m i n g the d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e n c a l c u l a t e d and o b s e r v e d
curves in Fig.
3 is due to trapping,
at the i n j e c t i o n level of Fig.
one is tempted to speculate that
5, the c o n c e n t r a t i o n of carriers
is suf-
f i c i e n t l y larger than the trap density that the role of trapping is minimized.
1.5~ 1.0
t-/
i/io
~~ //
\\
0.5
io
= 658 nA
to
= 5.5 ms
E" = 34kV/cm = 0.64
\ 0
0
I
0.5
I
1.0
\\
I
1.5
2.0
t/t o
Fig. 5. P h o t o c u r r e n t p u l s e for high i n j e c t i o n level (qo = 3.6 x I0-9C). Dashed curve: c a l c u l a t e d pulse including space charge effects (ref. 4).
W h i l e such trap s a t u r a t i o n may occur, the curves of Fig. that other factors are m o r e important.
6 indicate
In this case, the electrode
spacing and applied v o l t a g e were i n c r e a s e d in such a way as to give a s o m e w h a t larger e l e c t r i c field w i t h an increase in transit time to 9.3 ms.
The q u a n t i t y of injected charge was 3.7 x 10-9C.
The experi-
m e n t a l curve shows a peak w h i c h is far h i g h e r than any p o i n t on the
290 c a l c u l a t e d curve.
This indicates that the observed pulse currents are
too large to be e x p l a i n e d by space charge effects,
even in the absence
of trapping.
2.0[1.5 ¸
ill o
/~
I 1.0
. / /" j
.
\\
I
\
io
= 371 n A
to
= 9.3 ms
E
= 44 kV/cm
\\ Eq/E
\\
0.5 •
= 0.51
\ \
\
01
I
0
0.5
I t/to
1.0
1.5
Fig. 6. P h o t o c u r r e n t pulse for high injection level ( q o = 3.7 x i0-9C). Dashed curve: calculated pulse including space charge effects (ref. 4).
It appears,
therefore,
that such strongly peaked current pulses m u s t
be due to an increase during transit either of the number of carriers, as by a m u l t i p l i c a t i o n process due to impact ionization, m o b i l i t y of the injected carriers.
or of the
The o b s e r v a t i o n that the effect is
g o v e r n e d p r i m a r i l y by the number of carriers
injected rather than by
the field strength argues strongly against a carrier m u l t i p l i c a t i o n effect. change.
However,
this o b s e r v a t i o n may be c o m p a t i b l e with a m o b i l i t y
The effect is observed at c o n c e n t r a t i o n s of injected carriers
much larqer than the thermal e q u i l i b r i u m value and this large excess carrier density could lead to p e r t u r b a t i o n s
in the o c c u p a n c y of energy
levels a s s o c i a t e d with the hopping m e c h a n i s m of c o n d u c t i o n characteristic of liquid sulfur.
Further,
the shape of the e x p e r i m e n t a l curves is
c o m p a t i b l e w i t h the hypothesis of an increased m o b i l i t y in that the short time to the peak suggests transit by many carriers than the u n p e r t u r b e d transit time.
in a time less
291
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author w o u l d like to thank Dr. J.M. Proud for m a n y helpful discussions and Mr. R o b e r t Smith for a s s i s t a n c e in the e x p e r i m e n t a l work.
REFERENCES 1 2 3 4
P.K. J.M. T.N. A.C.
Ghosh and W.E. Spear, J. Phys. C, Ser. 2, i, 1968, 1347-1358. Proud and J.J. Auborn, Appl. Phys. Lett., 57, 1975, 265-267. G u l i e v and D.I. Zulfugarly, Zh. Prikl Khim. 47, 1974, 2643-2646 Papadakis, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 28, 1967, 641-647.