Gene, 19 (1982) 127-138 Elsevier Biomedical
Press
Molecular cloning and characterization of double-stranded cDNA coding for bovine chymosin (Recombinant
DNA;
bacteriophage
f 1 as cloning
vector;
gel-transfer
hybridization;
bovine
protease;
rennin)
Donald Moir, Jen-i Mao, James W. Schumm, Gerald F. Vovis, Bernadette L. Alford and Alison TauntonRigby Department of Molecular Genetics, Collaborative Research, Inc., Waltham, MA 02154 (U.S.A.) (Received
May IOth, 1982)
(Accepted
June Ist, 1982)
SUMMARY
A full-length cDNA copy of the mRNA encoding calf chymosin (also known as rennin), a proteolytic enzyme with commercial importance in the manufacture of cheese, has been cloned in an fl bacteriophage vector. The nucleotide sequence of the cDNA was determined, and translation of that sequence into amino acids predicts that the zymogen prochymosin is actually synthesized in vivo as preprochymosin with a 16 amino acid signal peptide. In vitro translation of total poly(A)-enriched (abomasum) and immunoprecipitation with antichymosin antiserum (probably
preprochymosin
judging
from that tissue. Gel-transfer
from the &-value)
hyb~dization
is the major
RNA from the calf fourth stomach revealed that a form of chymosin in vitro translation
of restriction
endonuclease-cleaved
with labeled cDNA probes indicated that the two known two different alleles of a single chymosin gene.
forms of chymosin,
Chymosin (EC 3.4.23.4), also known as rennin, is the major proteolytic enzyme in the fourth (abomasum)
of the unweaned
calf (Folt-
mann, 1970). Its biological function appears to be the specific cleavage of the k-casein molecule of milk resulting in the coagulation of milk protein (Kaye and Jolles, 1978). In addition to aiding the suckling calf in the digestion of its diet, this activAbbreviations: kb, kilobase
AMV, avian myeloblastosis pairs;
SDS, sodium
0378-l f 19/82/~-~/$02.75
dodecyl
DNA
A and B, must be products
of
Chymosin (M, 36000) is synthesized in vivo as a zymogen precursor called prochymosin (M, 41000) which is activated by proteolytic release of a 42 amino acid fragment from the amino terminal end (Pederson and Foltmann, 1975). Two chromatographically different forms, A and B, of the
virus; bp, base pairs; sulfate.
0 1982 Etsevier Biomedical
chromosomal
of RNA
ity makes chymosin commercially useful for the production of cheese. Many other proteolytic enzymes, including pepsin, chymotrypsin, and papain will coagulate milk, but these enzymes degrade milk proteins more extensively than does chymosin (Tang et al., 1959) and are therefore less suitable for cheese production.
INTRODUCTION
stomach
bovine
product
Press
12X
enzyme amino
and
its zymogen
acid sequence
determined
et al., 1977;
1979). Com-
(Foltmann
of this sequence
quence
of pepsinogen
ogy (about
55%); both
inactivated
by chemical
1979).
aspartate
Consequently,
classified
with the amino
A reveals pepsin
extensive
modification
homol-
have
of
et al.. been
of the same acid protease
family.
contain
report,
we describe
copy of the chymosin
Nucleotide
sequencing
the cloning A coding
of the cloned
of a
sequence.
gene has al-
lowed us not only to determine for the first time the complete prochymosin A amino acid sequence. but also to predict that the protein is synthesized in vivo as a “preprochymosin” molecule containing a 16 amino acid “signal sequence” at its amino terminus. Further, we describe experiments, using radioactively labeled cloned cDNA as probes, which indicate in the bovine
that there is a single chymosin gene genome, and therefore, that the A
and B forms must represent alleles of the same polymorphic
MATERIALS
products
Minimal
medium
was
by J. Miller (1972). modified
0.5% casamino
to
acids.
(b) Enzymes and synthetic oligonucleotides Restriction purchased under
enzymes
from
New
the conditions
AMV
Biochemicals, reverse
Life Sciences,
and T4 DNA England
ligase were
Biolabs
recommended
plier. T4 polynucleotide P-L
In this cDNA
and 60 mg NaOH.
M9 as described
are
of either
(Foltmann
enzymes
glucose,
acid se-
and chymosin
residues these
as members
the entire B has been
parison
two essential
are known:
of prochymosin
and
kinase was obtained
and pepsin
transcriptase
used
by the supfrom
was from Sigma.
was purchased
Inc. Sl nuclease
from
and E. coli DNA
polymerase I Klenow fragment ringer-Mannheim. E. coli DNA
were from Boehpolymerase I was
the gift of S. Scherer (Stanford University). Oligo(dT)-cellulose. oligo(dpT),,_,,, synthetic oligonucleotide Hind111 linkers (CCAAGCTTGG) and micrococcal nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate were products of Collaborative Research. Inc. (c) Preparation of antiserum
of different
gene.
AND METHODS
(a) Strains and media Escherichia coli strain JM 101 (F’traD36 proAB lacZZAM15 in a A( lac pro)supE thi- background) as described by J. Messing (1979) was used as the f 1 host. Transformations and transfections were done using E. co/i strain BNN45 (hsdR hsdM supE44 supF met- thi-) of Davis et al. (1980). Phage CGF4, containing a unique Hind111 restriction site in the intergenic space, was constructed from f 1 phage R229 (Boecke, 1981) by restriction with EcoRI, incubation with E. coli polymerase I Klenow fragment plus all four deoxynucleoside triphosphates to fill in the cohesive termini, and ligation with Hind111 synthetic oligonucleotide linkers (CCAAGCTTGG). Rich medium (TY) for growth of E. coli infected with fl bacteriophage contained, per liter: 10 g Bacto tryptone, 8 g NaCl, 1 g yeast extract, 1 g
Partially purified chymosin (Sigma) was purified to apparent
(EC 3.4.23.4) homogeneity on
DEAE-cellulose (Foltmann, 1970). About 500 pg was injected into each of two New Zealand white rabbits in complete Freund’s adjuvant followed by injections every 14 days of 250 pg chymosin in incomplete adjuvant until a high titer of specific anti-chymosin antiserum was achieved. (d) Isolation of poly(A)-enriched
RNA
Total RNA (45 mg) was isolated from 21 g of mucosal tissue from the calf fourth stomach essentially by the method of Deeley et al. (1977). Poly(A)-enriched RNA (1 mg) was obtained by one passage over a 4 ml oligo(dT)-cellulose column as described by Desrosiers et al. (1975). (e) Preparation cDNA
and cloning
of double-stranded
About 16 pg of double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 20 pg of calf stomach poly(A)containing RNA (Wickens et al., 1978). Digestion with Sl nuclease and separation of the double-
129
stranded enzyme
cDNA
from the nucleotides
were performed
Wahl et al. (1979a). To insure double-stranded was treated radioactively
cDNA
DNA
ligase
After
treatment
nuclease were
that the ends of the
running
and
MacDonald,
Hind111
released
synthetic
from
high-M,
DNA
on Biogel A-5 m (Sippel (0.3
by
in a 2% agarose
0.37 M Tris-glycine buffer).
rate of about NaOH
The gel was run (about
5 cm/h.
Following
for 1 h, rinsing
and examined
in 0.2 M
in water, and neutralization
in 0.5 pg/ml under
and
3 h) at a
soaking
in 0.5 M Tris - HCl, (pH 7.4) for about gel was stained
gel con-
pH 9.5 (gel buffer
ultraviolet
15 min, the
ethidium
bromide
illumination.
(h) In vitro translation and immunoprecipitation
chro-
et al., 1978).
Hind111
to electrophoresis
endo-
oligonucleotides
matography
Erg) bearing
1979).
restriction
The
DNA
I and
(2 pg) were
cDNA (1.5 pg) using T4
with
separated
the DNA
polymerase
HTindIII linkers
(Goodman
the
as described
would be blunt,
ligated to the blunt-ended
jected taining
with E. coli DNA labelled
and the Sl by
exactly
cohesive
termini was ligated to phage CGF4 doublestranded DNA (0.2 pg) which had been cut with Hind111 endonuclease and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Goodman and MacDonald, 1979). Hind111 linkers were chosen for
In
vitro
translations
were
performed
as de-
scribed by Pelham and Jackson (1976) in a 25-~1 final volume containing 10 ~1 of micrococcal nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte of [ 35S]t.-methionine (100 Ci/mmol, Nuclear),
and
20 pg/ml
lysate, 50 FCi New England
poly(A)-enriched
RNA
from the calf abomasum. A portion (10 ~1) of the translation reaction was immunoprecipitated with
insertion of the double-stranded cDNA into the vector because analysis of the known amino acid
chymosin
sequence of prochymosin predicted there would be no Hind111 sites within the DNA sequence encod-
10 pg of unlabelled chymosin or pepsin essentially as described by Gordon et al. (1977) except goat
ing chymosin. Cells of E; colt strain BNN45 were transfected with the ligated DNA and plated with
anti-rabbit serum was added as a second antibody. The washed immunoprecipitates were subjected to
a seed culture of strain (0.7% in TY medium).
electrophoresis in a discontinuous polyacrylamide gel containing 0.1% SDS according to the method of Laemmli and Favre (1973).
JMlOl
in soft top agar
antiserum
in the presence
or absence
of
(f) Plaque hybridization Plaque hybridization was carried out essentially as described by Benton and Davis (1977). Under these conditions of hybridization, the labelled cDNA concentration should be limiting.
(i) Hybridization
selection
Hybridization selection was carried out essentially as described by Miller et al. (1980) using either 5 pg of purified
recombinant
fl phage dou-
(g) Sizing of intact fl phage in agarose gel
ble-stranded DNA or a mixture of 5pg each of four recombinant phage DNAs. Eluted RNA was
Intact filamentous phage subjected to electrophoresis in agarose gels under the following condi-
translated
tions migrate at a rate inversely proportional to the size of the packaged DNA (Beaudoin, 1970). The method is essentially as described by Nelson et al. (1981). Samples of intact phage (5 X lO*/ml) picked directly from the transfection plate were amplified by growth overnight at 37°C on strain JMlOl ( IO5 phage into 1 ml of culture at A,, = 0.1) in TY medium and harvested by centrifugation. Aliquots of the supernatant (20 ~1 containing 1X 10” phage) were mixed with 5 ~1 of a solution of 40% sucrose and 0.02% bromphenol blue and sub-
in vitro
and
the translation
products
were subjected to electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide gel as described above.
tj) DNA isolation Plasmid DNA was prepared essentially by the method of Clewell and Helinski (1969). Doublestranded replicative form I DNA was isolated from bacteriophage fl infected bacterial cultures by the method of Model and Zinder (1974). Sequencing was by the method of Maxam and Gilbert ( 1980).
(k) DNA gel transfer
hybridization
Three nick-translated the method DNA
either
probe”), single
from
or from HincII
the
entire
fragments
were prepared phage
et al., 1975) after separation Isolated
were isolated
by the freeze-squeeze
a 0.6% agarose
the
and “5’-terminal”
These DNA fragments
to labeling
from
et al.. 1978) to
Kpn site in the preprochymosin
insert (the “3’-terminal”
probes).
by
(“complete
extending
site in fl (Horiuchi
the single internal cDNA
probes
of Rigby et al. (1977) using R118/37
method
prior
(Thuring
by electrophoresis
in
gel.
calf thymus
DNA (72 pg) was cut with
2530 units of the appropriate restriction enzyme in a 90-~1 volume for 5 h at 37°C. Each restriction enzyme
reaction
was divided
into three equal por-
tions, and the DNA was subjected to electrophoresis in three lanes of a 0.6% agarose gel. DNA fragments of known size were included in another lane. After electrophoresis, the DNA was blotted onto a nitrocellulose filter (Schleicher and Schuell) according to the methods of Southern (1975). and the filter was cut into three pieces to be hybridized with the three different probes. The nitrocellulose was pretreated, hybridized with 2-3 X 10h cpm/lane
of nick-translated
essentially
as described
probe,
and
washed
by Wahl et al., (1976b).
Fug.I. In
I) or
hybridizations
lksate
phoresis in a 0.6% agarose gel according to McMaster and Carmichael (1977). The RNA was transferred to nitrocellulose, hybridized with lo6 cpm of ‘*P-labeled nick-translated R207 DNA and washed exactly as described by Thomas ( 1980).
RESULTS
(a) Polyadenylated encodes
RNA
from
the calf abomasum
chymosin
Poly(A)-enriched calf fourth stomach determine whether
RNA was isolated from the as described in METHODS. To this RNA preparation con-
translation
III
ucts
\ubJect
the
pepsin (lane 6X000). and
to
methods.
\Itrc,
from
(lane 4).
The
In the
or
of
P-lactoglohulin
four
(lane
IO p(g of
( M,
43000).
(M,
1X000)
2)
was
in-
retuxloc\ protan
proteins
mRNA
v+err
chymoaln uith
of bo\lnc
em-
(lmr te
prod-
sutoradiographq
antiserum.
unlabelled
immunoprecipitated positions
The
lanes.
\tomach
,tnd Buffer
rabbit
and
last
anti-chymosin
mlgratwn
ovalbumin
RiXA
-mrthiomnr.
the
calf
mRNA
.mtiserum.
electruphorrsis
with
6).
stomach
nuclrase-treated
of [“S]-I
m
presence
calf
poly(A)-rnrxhed
prewvx
munoprecipitated in
of
ant]-chymosln
micrococcal
the
were
III
with
stomach
with
described
or
Poly(A)-enriched calf stomach RNA (10 pg) was treated with glyoxal and subjected to electro-
calf
cuhated
aired
(I) RNA gel-transfer
vitro
munclprrcipitation
Lib synthe-
either
alone
(lane
preimmunr serum
chymosin
( M,
are shown
at left.
albumln 36000.
1n1-
(lane
3)
5) or xrum
( M, “c”‘)
tained messenger RNA encoding chymosin. it was translated in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (see METHODS). When the [-7sS]methionine-labeled translation products were analyzed on a 10% polyacrylamide gel containing SDS, a single major protein product with an M,-value of about 43000 was observed (Fig. 1, lane 2). Immunoprecipitation of the translation products using rabbit antiserum prepared against purified chymosin (see METHODS) and analysis of the precipitate on the same gel (Fig. 1, lane 3) revealed that the major protein was precipitated by the anti-chymosin serum. Specific-
ity was confirmed purified
by adding
chymosin
munoprecipitation not pepsin, binding
or
competed
by excess
and unlabeled
sin, or, alternatively, translation
imbut
protein
for
in vitro translation,
than chymosin, was
chymosin.
after
specifi-
This minor
product
a smaller
starting
was also
competed
species may be a degradation from
the
chymosin,
(Fig. 1, lanes 5 and 6). A during
smaller
immunoprecipitated
during
purified
with the labeled
species produced
which is slightly cally
pepsin
reaction:
to the antibody
minor
excess nonradioactive
of chymo-
protein
resulting
the normal
ATG
initiation codon. It is clear from these results that chymosin, in one form or another, is the major in vitro
translation
poly(A)-enriched
product
from
the calf stomach
RNA.
(b) Identification
of cDNA
clones
bearing
the
chymosin structural gene
Fig. 2. Identification
of cDNA
DNA by the technique
The apparent high abundance of prochymosinencoding mRNA suggested a way to screen for cDNA clones likely to contain chymosin-coding sequences. The method involves the use of a limiting amount of a radioactive cDNA probe derived from the total polyadenylated RNA to screen candidate clones by hybridization. Under these conditions, only the cloned sequences representing the abundant
mRNA
species should hybridize
nificant amounts of probe. A library of about 2000 cDNA
sig-
poly(A)-enriched
RNA (lane “C’)
cellulose membranes
containing
or from a recombinant reticulocyte
products
were
DNA from phage CGF4
lysate
subject
phage
(“mix”)
was translated
(see METHODS). to electrophoresis
gel and the dried gel was exposed
18 h. The
migration
tains
(arrow
position
products
in a
The
translation
in an
SDS-poly-
to X-ray film for
of ovalbumin
(M,
43000)
at left, “43 K”). The last lane (“-RNA”)
translation
coding
Calf stomach
or RNA eluted from nitro-
bound
acrylamide shown
chymosin
phage (R68, RI 18, R143, and R207) or
from all four recombinant rabbit
clones bearing
of hybridization-selection.
seen in the absence
is
con-
of any added
RNA.
clones in an fl
phage vector (see METHODS) was screened by plaque-filter hybridization using limiting con-
(CGF4)
centrations of 32P-labeled cDNA as probe. Intact phage from 85 of the most intensely hybridizing
RNA which yielded an M, 43000 product upon translation. One recombinant, R68 (Fig. 2), gave
plaques agarose
an intermediate result, but subsequent experiments involving hybridization with an authentic chymosin-encoding DNA probe confirmed that it does not carry chymosin sequences; presumably, the intermediate result was due to difficulty in washing away the unbound chymosin mRNA which represents a major portion of the total poly(A)enriched RNA. Restriction endonuclease cleavage analysis of DNA from two of the phage which appear to
were subjected gels to determine
to electrophoresis in the approximate size of
the DNA insert (see METHODS). Double-stranded replicative form I DNA was isolated from cells infected with eight different phage having inserts on the order of 1 kb. Inserts bearing sequences coding for chymosin were identified by the technique of hybridization-selection as described in METHODS. The results with four of the cloned cDNAs are shown in Fig. 2. Three of the four and R143) clearly hybridized (R118, R207, chymosin mRNA as judged from the appearance of the M, 43000 product revealed by translation of the eluted mRNA. Fig. 2 also shows that fl vector
DNA
with
no insert
did not
bind
any
contain chymosin cDNA inserts (R207 and R118) was carried out. Comparison with the distribution of restriction endonuclease cleavage sites predictable from the amino acid sequence suggested that
132
these two phages the
chymosin
analysis
might carry
coding
also indicated
two Hind111 inserts length.
all or nearly
sequence.
The
that phage RI 18 contained approx.
1000 and
phage
chymosin The inserts
(R118/37)
sequences DNA
in phage
termined
The
R118/37
R118/37
analysis.
and revealed
the coding
shown
in Fig. 3 along
quence
analysis.
were
protein
coding
and Gilbert
untranslated
that
nucleotides
sequence
phage
for all of
ment
the strategy
information
for se-
from both
and R207 was combined
this map: together
de-
with
Sequence
phages R118/37 cDNA
R207
of Maxam
sequences
contains
and the to contain
of the chymosin
by the method
(1980).
was shown
by restriction
sequences
A map displaying restriction endonuclease cleavage sites in the chymosin-encoding cDNA is
1200 bp in
The larger of these was subcloned
resulting
(c) Nucleotide sequence of the preprochymosin gene
all of
restriction
to make
the two phages carry the entire
sequence
plus 20 nucleotides
sequence
as well
of 3’ untranslated
of the cDNA
as at
sequence.
inserts
in both
of 5’
least
100
Every segrecombinant
preprochymosin (see below) except for the first 24 nucleotide residues and that phage R207 contains
phage was sequenced twice, usually from different, labeled ends. The nucleotide sequence is given in
the missing sequence. The total length of unique consecutive chymosin sequence that was cloned, combining the infor-
Fig. 4. Two unusually gross features of the cDNA insert in phage R707 are shown in Fig. 3. First. about 180 nucleotides of sequence from the middle of the gene (nucleotides 391-566 in Fig.4) were duplicated in an inverted orientation at the beginning of the R207 insert. Second, about 100
mation from phage R118/37 and R207. is about 1300 bases. When the calf stomach poly(A)enriched RNA was denatured and subjected to RNA gel-transfer
hybridization
cloned
cDNA sequences discrete RNA
chymosin
METHODS),
using radioactively
1500 nucleotides shown).
nucleotides of coding sequence (nucleotides 644757) are deleted from phage R207 but are present in phage R118/37. Artifactual, inverted repetitions at the 5’ end of cDNA clones have been
as probe (see species about
detected
(data
not
It thus appears that there is a single major mRNA species in the calf stomach cells,
and that the clones tion in that mRNA.
c
contain
in the literature
.
a
*
c
e-1
U
endonuclease
cleavage
sites in the cDNA
inserts of recombinant
endonuclease
and
the open
box denotes
sites shown in parentheses
were used for DNA restriction
above the full length
fragment
sequencing. labeled
the sequence are present
The arrows
at the site marked
below
codon. The direction
R207 and R118/37.
Hind111 site at the 3’ end of the R207 insert is not shown here. but is more than 100 nucleotides The heavy arrows.
ATG initiation
phage
linker-derived R207,
*
.
beginning
phage
with the A of the preprochymosin
I
are numbered
site in RI 18/37.
*
I
.
reverse
of a “loop-back”
-
*
e
Fig. 3. A map of restriction
arise during
due to formation
c
*
(Chan et al., 1979; O’Hare
et al., 1979); they apparently
most of the
transcription
/---+7 1
reported
line representing missing
from
at additional, the full-length
by the vertical
the cDNA
inserts,
R207 but present
unmarked
locations
line denote
line associated
denote
in RI IS/37 in the cDNA
the length
with each arrow.
Nucleotides
is 5’ to 3’. left to right. The synthetic
of DNA
3’ to the corresponding
the inverted
repeat
(see RESULTS).
present
insert but these particular sequence
in
Restriction
determined
sites from
a
133
,‘dT
CGCTCCACCCACATCCAAG -52‘
ARG
CYS
LEU
YAL
VAL
LEU
LEU
ALA
b$L
PHE
ALA
LEU
30 ARC ILE
PRO
LEU
TYR
LYS
SER
GLN
CLY
ALA
FLU
ILE
@R
TG AGG TGT CTC CTC GTG C A CTT GCT GTC TTC GCT CTC CC CAG GGC CCT GAG ATC AC TO a* P SO
CLY
LYS
SER
LEU
40 ARC
LYS
ALA
LEU
LYS
GLU HIS
CLY
LEU
LEO
GLIJ
ASP
PHE
LEU
CLN
LYS
CLN
ACC
ATC CCT CTG TAC AAA G C AAG TCT CTG AGG AAG GCG TG AAG GAG CAT CCC CTT CT GAG GAC TTC CTG CAC AAA CAG Ii0 10 f 10 E 140
CLN
TYR
SO GLY
ILE
CA1; TAT
GGC
ATC ACC ACC
PXE
LYS
ILE
SER
SER
LYs
TYR
SER
GLY
Pm
cLY
60 ixu
vAL
ALA
SER
TYR
PRO
LEU
THR ASN
TYR
70 LEU
ASP
SER
GLN
TYR
G TAC TCC GGC TTC GGG GA GTG GCC AGC GTG CCC CTG A C AAC TAC CTG GAT AGT CAG AC E 2T 0 10 %" 10 2c 0
80 GLY
VAL
LEO
90 CLY
THR
PRO
PRO
GLN
GLU
PXG
TXR
VAL
LEU
100 PHE
ASP
THR
GLY
SER
SER
ASP
PHZ
TRP
VAL
PRO
TTT WC
AAG ATC TAC CT OGGG ACC CCG CCC CAG GAG ; ; ACC GTG CTG TTT CAC ACT GC TCC TCT GAC TTC TGG CT CCC c 30 s T 28 0
SER
TYR
110 ILE
CYS
TCT ATC TX
LYS
SER
ASN
ALA
CYS
120 LYS
ASN
HIS
GLN ARC
PHE
ASP
PRO
ARC
LYS
SER
SER
THR
PHE
GLN ASN
LEO
CLY
TGC AAG A C AAT CCC TGC AAA AAC CAC AG CGC TTC GAC CCG AGA AA TCG TCC ACC TTC CAG AAC C G GCC 30 ! 30 Ii: 30 s 30 H 140
330 SER
ILE
HIS
TYR
GLY
TXR
GLY
SER
MET
150
LYS
PRO
LEU
GLN
CLY
!L*(;
CCC
CTC TCT ATC CAC TAC GGG ACA GGC AGC ATG CAG GGC ATC CTG GGC TAT GAC ACC GTC ACT GTC TCC AAC ATT GTG 460 420 440 4bo
ASP
ILE
GLN
(;AC
ATC
CAG CAG ACA GTA GGC CTG AK 480
160 GLN
THR
ILE
LEU
GLY
TYR
PRO
SER
CLY
LEO
SER
THR
GLN
LEO
ALA
SER
SER
VAL
TYR
VAL
THR
GLU
PRO
GLY
ASP
TYR
SBR
ILF
MET ASP
TCG
ATA 5h
ARG ASN
GLY
220 GLN
PHE
TRP
THR
TYR
ALA
GLU
PHE
T(‘C
CT<: CAC
Kf,““;
ALA
CYS
GLY
CCC
TIX GAG
‘;L#
ASP
CLY
ILE
LEU
CLY
CLU
PHE
ASP
ASI
MET MET ASN
ARG
HIS
LEU
VAL
ALA
CCC
GTG
TTT
GAC
AAC
A;
AAC
AGG
CAC
CTG
GTG
G C CAA 6f 0
GAC
ILE
230 ASP
PRO
SER
TYR
TYR
CLY
OATG s
SER
MET
LEU
THR
LEV
GLY
ALA
Tee TAC
6II 0 250
VAL
VAL
VAL
660
T HIS
ASM ILE
PRO
280 LEU
SER
180 VAL
crc, TTC ‘rc(; Gr~6 ;c ATG cAc AGG AAT GGC c.4G GAG AGC ATG cTc ACG CTG G G GCC ATC GAC cm
SER
VAL
200 GLU
F
PHE
THR
ACC CAG C@ CCC GGG GAC GTC TTC ACC TAT CCC GAA TTC GAC GCG AT CTG GGG sso 56: 0 500
ATC GCC TAC CCC ; ; CTC GCC TCA GAG TAC
LEU
ASP
l?O VAL
190 MET ALA
TYR
GLN ASP
THR
AC ACA GGG 7F 0
260
PRO
VAL
THR
VAL
GLN
GLN TYR
TRP
GLN
PHE
THR
VAL ASP
SER
VAL
THR
ILE
SER
GLY
VAL
VAL
VAL
CCC
GTG
RCA
GTG
CAG
CAG 760
TAC
TGG
CAG
TTC
ACT
GTG
AC 7P 0
AGT
GTC
ACC
ATC
AGC
GG
GTG
GTT
GTG
CYS
270 GLN ALA
ILE
LEU
ASP
THR
CLY
THR SER
LYS
280 LEU
VAL
CLY
PRO
SER
SER
ASP
ILE
LEU
ASN
290 ILE
GGC TGT CAC GCC ATC
CTG8
;C
ACG
GGC
ACC
TCC
AAG
CT
GTC
GGG
CCC
AGC
AGC
GAC
TYR
ASP
GLU PHE
ASP
ILE
ASP
CYS
ASP
310 ASN
GLY
E 300 GLN
:L1/
CTB
ALA
ILE
CLY
ALA
THR
GLN ASN
LEU
SER
TYR
MET
PRO
THR
VAL
Cht;
C.\G
GCC
ATT 8bO
CGA
GCC
ACA
CAG
AAC
CA TAC 9s0
GAT
GAG
TTT
GAC
ATC
GAC 910
TGC
GAC
AAC
CTG
AGC
TAC
TG 9 %0
CCC
ACT
GTG
'IALPHE GLLI ILE
ASN
GLY
LYS
MET
TYR
PRO
THR
330 PRO
SER
ALA
TYR
THR
SER
GLN
ASP
GLN
GLY
340 PHE
CYS
TXR
SER
GLY
320 LEU
crc TTT G.\ ATC AAT GGC AAA ATG TAC c A CTG ACC ccc TCC CCC TAT ACC ACC CAG GAC CAG GGC TT TGT ACC AGT GGC 1s 20 90 E Id00 90 : GLU
ASN
HIS
370
360
350 PiiE GL:I SER
SER
GLN
LYS
TTC CAG A,T oh\ ;\AT CAT Tee CAG AAA
1s10
TRP
ILE
LEU
GLY
ASP
VAL
PRE
ILE
ARG
CLU
TYR
TYR
SER
VAL
PHE
ASP
ARC
ALA
GG ATC cTc GGG GAT GTT TT ATC CGA GAG TAT TAC AGC G c TTT GAC AGG wc 1T00 1s 80 18 60
380 AS0 AS:1 LEU &\C
MC
VAL
GLY
LEU
ALA
LYS
ALA
TC <;TG GGG CTC CCC AAA GC
ILE
ATC TGA
TCACATCGCTGACC
AGAACCTCACTGTCCCCA
1P 60
Fig.4. The nucleotide
sequence
phage R207 and R118/37. Nucleotides nucleotides
are numbered
and the derived ammo acid sequence
The ammo acids are numbered as in Fig. 3 beginning
391 to 566 present
of preprochymosin
consecutively
beginning
with the A of the signal
at the 5’ end of the cDNA
insert of phage
ACACCTGCACACACACAT;$;A$AcATGTA
1f 80
encoded
by the cDNA
with the initial methionine
sequence
initiation
R207 is not shown.
codon.
inserts in recombinant of the signal sequence.
The inverted
repetition
of
134
stabilized by a short region of homology between a segment near the 5’ end of the mRNA and an
crepancy,
internal
sequence
at position
region
of homology
(644-650
(Weaver
et al., 198 1). A short
between
and 758-764,
two internal
see Fig. 4) is probably
the cause of the observed
deletion
but in this case, the mechanism occurring
after the transfection
the bacteria1
cell. In any event,
tion is relatively cDNA tions
also
in phage R207,
may involve events of the DNA
into
in this region as judged
chymosin
of the chymosin
coding
by the sizes of restriction
translated amino acid sequence using the only reading frame free of termination codons for sufficient length to code for chymosin. The only ATG initiation codon suitable for initiation of translation lies 48 nucleotides 5’ to the beginning of the known amino acid sequence of prochymosin (the alanine residue number 17 encoded by nucleotides 49-51). Therefore, the initial product of translation in vivo must be a “preprochymosin” molecule “signal sequence”. This
secreted. The amino chymosin chymosin
with
is an extracellular acid
B molecule A molecule
the fact
protein
sequences
forms
(Foltmann
et al.. is the
result of deamidation
during
termination.
protein
In any case, the sequence that
is reported
this discrepancy
that
suggests
to the differences
the prochymosin
sequence
A and
differ by only one or two amino
de-
comparison B forms
acids out of 365.
that
pro-
which must be
of the entire
(d) Analysis of bovine genomic DNA by gel-transfer hybridization with cloned chymosin cDNA
se-
(data not shown).
chymosin
218 of both
1979). It is possible
frag-
The nucleotide sequence of the entire protein coding region is shown in Fig. 4 together with the
with a 16 amino acid conclusion is consistent
is unrelated
B forms since aspartate
this kind of dele-
rare. since three other
clones (R45, R118 and R143) had no dele-
quences ments
regions
however,
in the A and
pro-
and about half the prohave been reported previ-
ously (Foltmann et al., 1977; 1979). The amino acid sequence obtained by translation of the cloned cDNA gene agrees with the published prochymosin B sequence with two exceptions. First the codon beginning with nucleotide 652 (corresponding to amino acid residue 218 of Fig. 4 or residue number 204 of Foltmann et al. (1979)) specifies asparagine instead of aspartate. Second, the codon beginning with nucleotide 904 (amino acid residue 302 of Fig. 4 or residue number 290 of Foltmann et al. (1979)) specifies aspartate instead of glycine. The latter difference involves the single amino acid which is known to differ in prochymosins A and B (Foltmann et al., 1977; 1979); prochymosin A has an aspartate at position 302 in place of glycine. Therefore, the cloned DNA apparently represents the gene for preprochymosin A. The first dis-
The two forms of chymosin,
A and B, could be
the products of different genes of a gene family or they could be different alleles of the same gene. To distinguish between these possibilities, gel-transfer hybridization experiments were done by the method of Southern (1975). DNA from the thymus of a single calf was digested to completion with restriction endonucleases, subjected to electrophoresis through an agarose gel. transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, dioactive probes derived sin cDNA. one
Three
(EcoRI)
chymosin
restriction
which
cDNA
and hybridized with rafrom the cloned chymoenzymes
recognizes
sequence
sites
were used: within
the
and two which do not
(Sac1 and BglI). Enzymes which do not cut the cloned cDNA might, however, cut within the chromosomal copy of the gene in the event that the chromosomal gene contains intervening sequences (“introns”). To discriminate between fragments produced from many genes and fragments produced from a single gene containing intervening sequences, probes derived by nick-translation of different parts of the cDNA carried by phage R118/37 were used (see METHODS). One (called the 5’-terminal probe) extended from the single HincII site in bacteriophage fl (Horiuchi et al., 1978) to the single KpnI site early in the gene and includes the 5’ end of the chymosin cDNA insert (see Fig. 3); another (called the 3’-terminal probe) extended from the KpnI site to the single HincII site in fl at the other end of the cDNA and includes the 3’ end of the cDNA insert; the third probe (called the complete probe) consisted of the entire recombinant phage DNA. The results are shown in Fig. 5. Sac1 and BglI, which do not cut in the cloned cDNA sequence, gave similar results (lanes S and B in Fig. 5, A, B,
135
and C). The 3’ terminal probe
hybridized
probe
to three
while the 5’-terminal
probe
hybridization expected
. If chymosin
placed
(more if there
inte~ening
that both
a single restriction
genes,
probe would be
to yield at least two bands
The observation
to only a
of two different
with either terminal
were appropriately
case,
with one of the three
using the other two probes
A and B were the products
contain
in each
hybridized
single band which comigrates observed
and the complete
bands
sequences).
Sac1 and Bg/I digests fragment
hybridizing
to
the 5’-terminal is only
probe
one bovine
restriction
strongly chymosin
endonuclease
suggests gene.
cleavage
that there
Conceivably,
might
produce
fragments of similar size from the 5’ terminus of two different chymosin genes, but the fact that two different
enzymes
a coincidence chymosin terminal
give the same result makes such
unlikely.
If there
is only
gene, then the observation probe hybridized
ment indicates
chymosin
that the 3’-
to more than one frag-
that there are intervening
in the genomic
a single
gene.
sequences
It appears
that
there must be at least two intervening
sequences
since
Sac1 and
three
bands
are seen with both
BgEI. The results obtained with EcoRI, a restriction enzyme which cuts the cloned cDNA sequence, are shown in lane E of Fig. 5, A, B, and C. Cleavage of the genomic DNA with EcoRI produced two bands which hybridized to both the complete and 3’terminal probes; only one of these bands hybridized to the 5’-terminal probe. There is only one EcuRI site in the cloned cDNA sequence and it is about 240 nucleotides to the 3’ side of the KpnI site used to make the 5’ and probes. In the absence of intervening containing
additional
EcoRI
sites,
3’-terminal sequences a
single
chymosin gene should, after cleavage with EcoRI, yield two bands that hybridize to the 3’-terminal and complete probes, and only one of these bands should also hybridize to the 5’-terminal probe. This is exactly what was observed. Thus these results also support the hypothesis of a single chymosin gene and further predict the absence of EcoRI sites in any intervening sequences. In this case, the singularity of the gene is indicated not only by the presence of the one band detected by the Y-terminal probe, but also by the observation that the 3’-terminal probe detects the expected two bands. In conclusion, the results of the gel-transfer experiments with digests of bovine genomic DNA Fig. 5. Gel-transfer
hybridization
cleaved bovine genomic derived
from the cloned
chromosomal
DNA
of restriction
DNA with radioactively preprochymosin
was digested
endonucleaselabeled probe
cDNA
gene. Bovine
to completion
with EcoRI
(lane E), Sac1 (lane S), or BglI (lane B), subjected phoresis hybridized
in an agarose
gel, transferred
with nick-translated
of the preprochymosin (see METHODS
probes
and
derived from the 5’ end
gene (B), or the entire DNA
for experimental
to electro-
to nitrocellulose,
details).
gene (C)
are most consistent with the existence of a single bovine chymosin gene containing at least two intervening sequences. Digestion with three different enzymes supports the idea that there is a single chymosin gene, and the results with two of the three enzymes provides evidence for the hypothesis that this gene contains at least two intervening sequences. Therefore, it seems most likely that the
136
highly homologous
enzymes
the products
of different
in the bovine
population.
chymosin
A and B are
alleles of the same gene
their intense
hybridization
made from total poly(A~-containing
unweaned that DISCUSSION
this
chymosin. chymosin
The
enzymology
mann,
have
and
been
1970), but relatively
the molecular
protein
studied
chemistry
extensively
little was known
biology of the mRNA
of
Pepsin,
to be the major
and the gene(s)
a typical
sig-
However,
judging
2) and a long
produce active chymosin, and raises the question, currently under investigation, of the ability of prokaryotic or other eukaryotic organisms to carry out these processing events. Reinspection of the chymosin amino acid sequence in light of recent research on the attachto proteins
(Hubbard
is
enzyme
in the
and
Ivatt, 1981) reveals that chymosin contains two regions with the consensus sequence for addition of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides. These are Asn-Leu-Ser (amino acids 310-312 of Fig. 4) and Asn-His-Ser (amino acids 349-3.51 of Fig.4). Whether or not these acceptor sites are actually used for attachment of oligosaccharides is presently under study. Our data support the notion that chymosin mRNA must be an abundant species in calf fourth stomach cells. A chymosin-related protein (preprochymosin, judging from the molecular weight) appears to be the major product of in vitro translation of poly(A)-enriched mRNA, and cDNA clones containing chymosin sequences are found at high frequency among clones that are selected by
from
the
in vitro
translation
results, pepsin must be only a minor product in the unweaned calf’s stomach cells. This apparent developmental switch from chymosin synthesis to pepsin synthesis may be worth further study. The nucleotide sequence data suggest strongly that the gene we have cloned corresponds to the prochymosin A of Foltmann et al. (1977; 1979). since
at position
prochymosin
302 aspartate
A) as opposed
(asparagine
of carbohydrates
to
acid sequence,
after
stretch of hydrophobic amino acids. This means at least two protein processing events are required to
ment
of
1970).
amino
at position
proteolytic
source
homologous
the calf is shifted to a grain diet (Foltmann,
in the B form. published amino
(arginine
is quite
at the level of amino
nal sequence (Steiner et al., 1980), contains the customary positively charged amino acid near the terminus
is a rich commercial which
of the
with the fact
about
synthesized in vivo is “preprochymosin”, a form of prochymosin containing 16 additional amino acids at the amino terminus. This sixteen amino acid to constitute
tissue
is consistent
same tissue at a later stage of development,
new information. Inspection of the nucleotide sequence of the cloned chymosin cDNA indicates that the protein
which appears
calf, which
is the major
of the abomasum
(Folt-
coding for the enzyme. The cloning of a cDNA copy of the chymosin mRNA has provided some
peptide,
known
product
cDNA
RNA.
Thus, it seems likely that chymosin in vivo protein
chymosin
to radiolabelled
is encoded
to the glycine
(as in found
The other difference from the acid sequence of prochymosin B
at position
2 18 instead
of the aspartate
found in the amino acid sequence of both prochymosins A and B) most likely represents a sponianeous deamidation during protein sequencing. However, the possibility that our cloned gene represents a third form of prochymosin has not been rigorously excluded. It should be noted that each of the differences that have been found can be accounted for by single nucleotide substitutions, and the differences do not involve the two aspartate residues known to be important for chymosin activity, aspartate 92 and aspartate 274 (78 and 261 by the numbering of Foltmann et al. ( 1979)). During the course of this work, Harris et al. ( 1982) reported the nucleotide sequence of a cDNA clone coding for calf preprochymosin B. The sequence differs from that of preprochymosin A reported here at six nucleotide positions. One of these differences, A to G at position 905 (*4 in preprochymosin A and G in preprochymosin B). results in an aspartate to glycine change at amino acid 302. This is the known difference between prochymosin A and B determined by Foltmann et al. (1979). Four of the other five differences (G to A at positions 45, 432, and 1008, and C to T at
137
position
817) involve
modified
nucleotides
as part of EcoRII
Since these differences
which would
recognition
appear
to be in regions
the DNA in which only one strand by Harris
et al. (1982),
are
likely
more
residues
(1982) rather
A and
to asparagine
may be an additional A and B forms; Foltmann
by Harris
B. The
G to A at position
aspartate
cytosine
than true allelic differences
preprochymosins ference,
changes
modified
which were misidentified
between difin an
acid change
allelic difference
however,
et al.
additional
688, results
amino
of
was sequenced
these nucleotide
to represent
be
sequences.
and
between
the
it was not observed
by
A and B apparently
differ by
only one or two base changes, then the genes must be very homologous. A probe derived from one of the
chymosin
genes
should
hybridize
with
any
other. When we used our cDNA as a probe in gel-transfer hybridization experiments with bovine genomic
W.D.
clones
and
DNA we detected
only a single chymosin
gene which contains at least two intervening sequences. Therefore chymosins A and B apparently represent different alleles of a single locus; if the aspartate to asparagine change is not a protein sequencing artifact, then the third form would represent a third allele. In any case, the gel-transfer results indicate that the chymosin gene is not a member of an extensive family genes encoding similar proteins.
of homologous
Davis,
R.W.:
by hybridization
Screening
to single
hgt
plaques
recombinant
in situ. Science
196 (1977) 180-182. Boecke,
J.D.:
One
bacteriophage Ghan,
and
S.J., Noyes,
taining
two
codon
B.E., Agarwal,
and selection
full length
rat insulins
insertion
fl. Mol. Gen. Genet.
Construction
mutants
of
181 (1981) 288-291.
K.L.
and
Steiner,
of recombinant
complementary
DNAs
I and II. Proc. Natl. Acad.
D.F.:
plasmids
con-
corresponding
to
Sci. USA 76 (1979)
5036-5040. Clewell,
D.B. and Helinski,
D.R.:
Supercoiled
protein
complex
in Escheriehia
duced
conversion
to an open
Natl. Acad. Davis,
Cold
Harbor, Deeley,
circular
circular
DNA
and
form.
Harbor
in-
Proc.
166.
D. and Roth, J.R.: Advanced
Spring
DNA-
coli: purification
Sci. USA 62 (1969) 1159-l
R.W., Botstein,
Genetics.
et al. (1979).
Since chymosins
Benton,
Laboratory,
Bacterial
Cold
Spring
NY, 1980, p. 7.
R.G.,
Gordon,
Bina-Stein,
J.K.,
Bums,
M. and Goldberger,
the vitellogenin
gene
A.T.G.,
Mu&nix,
R.F.: Primary
in the rooster.
K.P.,
activation
J. Biol. Chem.
of 252
(1977) 8310-8319. Denhart,
D.: A membrane-filter
complementary
DNA.
technique
Biochem.
for the detection
Biophys.
of
Res. Commun.
23 (1966) 641-646. Desrosiers.
R.C.,
acterization
Friderici,
K.H.
of Novikoff
heterogeneity
and
Rottman,
hepatoma
mRNA
in the methylated
F.M.:
Char-
methylation
5’ terminus.
and
Biochemistry
14 ( 1975) 4367-4374. Foltmann,
B.: Prochymosin
and chymosin.
Methods
Enzymol.
19 (1970) 421-436. Foltmann,
B., Pederson,
Wybrandt, chymosin. Foltmann,
V.B., Jacobsen,
G.: The complete
amino
H., Kauffman,
D. and
acid sequence
of pro-
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 2321-2324.
B., Pederson,
The primary
V.B., Kauffman,
structure
D. and Wybrant,
of calf chymosin.
G.:
J. Biol. Chem. 254
(1979) 8447-8456. Goodman, genes ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
assistance,
Tom
Susan
and MacDonald, a mixture
Gravius Hayes
for expert
and Joya
technical
Minicucci
for
preparation of the manuscript. We thank David Botstein, Gerald Fink, Ronald Davis, and David Baltimore for helpful discussions and David Botstein, Gerald Fink, and Chris Goff for critically reading the manuscript. This investigation was supported by a contract from Dow Chemical Company.
J.I.,
Deeley,
Christmann,
Harris,
T.J.R.,
En-
of coliphage Madison.
mutants
and on multiple-
M13. Ph.D. Thesis, 1970, Univ.
A.T.H.,
Paterson,
B.M.,
R.G.: In vitro translation RNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
252
P.A., Lyons,
coding
A., Thomas,
P.G., Eaton,
T.A., Patel, T.P., Bose, C.C., Carey, N.H.
and Doel, M.T.: Molecular of cDNA
cloning
and nucleotide
for calf preprochymosin.
sequence
Nucl. Acids Res.
IO (1982) 2177-2187. Horiuchi,
K., Vovis,
phage genome:
G.F.
and
Model,
DNA Ivatt,
prod-
Cold
Spring
Harbor
NY, 1978, pp. 113-137.
Synthesis
oligosaccharides.
filamentous
and protein
D. and Ray. D.S. (Eds.).
Phages.
Harbor, R.J.:
P.: The
structure,
D.T., Dressier,
Cold Spring
SC.
and
genes, physical
Single-stranded
Hubbard,
J.: Studies on coat protein
Burns,
messenger
Lowe,
M.A.W., Millican,
aspara~ne-links
of Wisconsin,
Methods
(1977) 8320-8327
Laboratory, REFERENCES
R.G.,
of avian vitellogenin
The
length particles
of hormone
molecules.
J.L. and Goldberger,
ucts, in Denhardt,
Beaudoin,
R.J.: Cloning
of cDNA
zymol. 68 (1979) 75-90. Gordon,
We thank
H.M. from
processing
of
Annu. Rev. B&hem.
and
50
(1981) 555-583. Kaye,
N.M.C.
and Jolles,
three histidine
residues
P.: The involvement of cow k-casein
of one of the
in the chymosin-ini-
tiated milk
clotting
process.
Biochim.
Biophys.
Acta
536
Laemmli.
U.D.
and
bacteriophage Maxam,
Favre.
M.: Maturation
of the head
of
with base-specific
W.: Sequencing
chemical
cleavages.
end-labeled
Methods
DNA
Enzymol.
65
(I 980) 499-560. double-stranded
nucleic
gels by using
G.G.:
acids
Analysis
on
glyoxal
and
of single- and
polyacrylamide acridine
and
orange.
Proc.
J.:
A multipurpose
single-stranded
DNA
DNA Technical
Bulletin
Miller, J.H.: Harbor
Laboratory.
coding
Arrangement
sequences
unit of adenovirus
Nelson,
O’Hare,
Friedman. deletion
Harbor,
Cold Spring
NY, 1972 p. 43 1.
B.F., Paterson, of messenger
B.M. and RNA’s
and
of genomic
dent
H.R.B.
with a
C. and Chambon. cDNA
translation
Biochem. Rigby,
P.: No
gene: comsequences.
acid sequence
activation
of the
system
reticulocyte
Dieckmann.
deoxyribonucleic
vitro by nick translation Biol. 113 (1977) 237-251.
P.S., Ghan, mechanisms
G.:
sequences
sequences
among
DNA
J. Mol. Biol. 98
R. and Trucco.
mRNA
depen-
lysates.
Eur. J.
Rhodes.
C. and
acid to high specific with DNA
polymerase
Berg,
P.:
activity
in
I. J. Mol.
J. and Tager. of pro-
R.E.: Isolation
human
gastric
and
Juice.
J.
1178.
of denatured
transferred
RNA
to nitrocellulose
and
small
paper.
Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 (1980) 5201-5205. Thuring,
R.W.J.. Sanders.
method
Wahl.
long DNA
from agarose
gel. Anal.
66 (1975) 213-220.
G.M.,
Padgett,
R.A. and Stark,
overproduction
G.R.:
Gene amplifica-
of the first three
enzymes
of
in N-(phosphonacetyl)-L-aspartate-resistant
cells. J. Biol. Chem. 254 (1979a) 8679-8689.
G.M.,
Stern,
DNA
loxymethyl sulfate. Weaver,
J.P.M. and Borst, P.: A freeze-squeeze
for recovering
M. and Stark,
fragments paper
from
C.A., Gordon, cloning
terminus
G.R.: agarose
and rapid hybridization
Proc. Natl. Acad.
Efficient
transfer
of artifactual
inverted
by using dextran 3683-3687.
B.: Introduction sequences
of the sense strand of bovine parathyroid Proc. Natl. Acad.
M.P..
Buell. G.N.
double-stranded ovomucoid,
Communicated
and Schimke,
ovalbumin
by J. Carbon
by
at the 5’ hormone
Sci. USA 78 (1981) 407334077.
DNA and
of
gels to diazobenzy-
Sci. USA 76 (1979b)
D.F. and Kemper.
(1978) 2483-2495.
M.,
from
Hybridization
fragments
S.J.. Marsh,
in the biosynthesis
Sci. 343 (1980) I-16.
of gastricism
P.S.:
DNA
Wickens.
R.J.: An efficient from
crystallization
cDNA.
of prochymo-
67 (1976) 247-256.
P.W.J.,
Labeling
M.C..
Schutz,
gene
by gel electrophoresis.
teins. Ann. N.Y. Acad.
molecular
B.: Amino
Quinn,
Processing
large
55 (1975) 95-103.
and Jackson,
D.F..
H.S.:
hamster
Filamentous
mutants
in the ovalbumin
during
Steiner,
tion causes
108 (1981) 338-350.
and double-stranded
liberated
sin. Eur. J. Biochem. Pelham,
structural
of specific
separated
UMP synthesis
G.P.:
a noninfective
R., Benoist.
V.B. and Foltmann, segment
K. and
in vitro. Nucl. Acids Res. 5 (1978) 327553994.
fragments
Wahl,
of bacteriophage
Nucl. Acids Res. 7 (1979) 321-334. peptide
lysozyme
E.: Detection
Biochem.
late transcription
S.M. and Smith. vectors:
in gene III. Virology
K.. Breathnach,
Pederson.
Southern,
Thomas,
in the major
more than seven interruptions parison
of chicken
W., Nguyen-Huu,
Giesecke.
Biol. Chem. 234 (1959) 1174-
Recombinant
Genetics.
N.D.: In vitro synthesis
DNA cloning
nonpolar
the
J. Mol. Biol. 83 (1974) 231-251.
F.K.,
phage
M13.
on
2. J. Mol. Biol. 142 (1980) 455-488.
Model, P. and Zinder. fl protein.
based
2 (1979) 43-48.
R.P., Roberts,
M.B.:
system
in Molecular Cold Spring
Miller, J.S., Ricciardi. protein
cloning
bacteriophage
Experiments
Matthews,
Cloning
K.N.,
‘Tang, J.. Wolf, S., Caputto,
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 (1977) 4835-4838. Messing,
H.. Lindenmaier.
T., Timmis,
(1975) 503-517.
G.K. and Carmichael,
agarose
A.E., Land,
synthesized
T4. J. Mol. Biol. 80 (1973) 5755599.
A.M. and Gilbert,
McMaster,
Sippel.
Wurtz,
(1978) 329-340.
R.T.:
Synthesis
complementary
to
mRNAs.
J. Biol. Chem.
of
lysozyme, 253