Gene 288 (2002) 203–210 www.elsevier.com/locate/gene
Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a novel member of the Disintegrin and Metalloprotease-Domain (ADAM) family Bent Brachvogel a, Dorothee Reichenberg a, Stephanie Beyer a, Birgit Jehn b, Klaus von der Mark a, Wolfgang Bielke a,* b
a Department of Experimental Medicine I, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nuremberg, Glueckstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany Division of Molecular Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen/Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Abstract We cloned and characterized the cDNA and the expression pattern of a novel member of the murine ‘Disintegrin and MetalloproteaseDomain Family’ (ADAM). The predicted protein sequence reveals highest homology to the testase-subgroup, composed of ADAM 24, ADAM 25 and ADAM 26 and is therefore called testase 4. Reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction showed a strong expression of testase 4 in the adult testis, but not in any other organ or embryonic stage tested. Careful characterization by in situ hybridization confirmed specific expression of testase 4 in maturing sperm cells of 6-week-old mice, whereas no specific hybridization pattern was detectable in testes of 2.5-week-old mice. These data indicate a correlation between testase 4 expression and spermatogenesis and/or fertilization. q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Disintegrin–metalloprotease; Testase; Development; Testis; Sequence; In situ; Fertilization; Sperm
1. Introduction Cell surface proteins, such as receptors and membranelinked ligands are subject to consistent dynamic changes, which control their number and activity. Membrane anchored enzymes, receptors, ligands and adhesion molecules are targets of specific proteolytic modifications which determine the biological activity of these proteins. Typically, members of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain) family play pivotal roles in mediating such specific adhesion or proteolytic processing events, often during development (Blobel, 1997; Schlondorff and Blobel, 1999). Important regulatory processes mediated by ADAMs include the shedding of extracellular domains of transmembrane proteins as well as the regulation of cell adhesion and fusion, e.g. during myogenesis (Yagami-Hiromasa et al., 1995) or sperm-egg cell fusion (Myles et al., 1994). Besides in mammals, ADAMs have been identified in a wide range of organisms, including Drosophila, XenoAbbreviations: ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain; RT, reverse transcription; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; cDNA, DNA complementary to RNA; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; HPRT, hypoxanthine–guanine phosphoribosyl transferase; EGF, epidermal growth factor; bp, base pair(s) * Corresponding author. Tel.: 149-9131-852-9102; fax: 149-9131-8526341. E-mail address:
[email protected] (W. Bielke).
pus and Caenorhabditis (Rooke et al., 1996; Alfandari et al., 1997; Wen et al., 1997). Structurally, ADAMs are transmembraneous proteins whose extracellular domains bear strong homology with disintegrins and metalloproteases originally known as soluble components from snake venoms (Huang et al., 1987; Gould et al., 1990; Wolfsberg et al., 1995; McLane et al., 1998). Their conserved modular protein structure typically consists of a signal sequence at the N-terminus, followed by a pro-domain, a metalloprotease and disintegrin-domain and a cysteine-rich region which is adjacent to a transmembrane and a cytoplasmic domain (Schlondorff and Blobel, 1999). ADAMs displaying proteolytic activity are characterized by a zinc-binding catalytic active consensus sequence (Bode et al., 1993; Rawlings and Barrett, 1995; Stocker et al., 1995). Well studied ADAMs bearing proteolytic activity, including Kuzbanian (ADAM10) and the TNF-a converting enzyme (ADAM17), are involved in regulation of Notch-receptordependent signaling and the shedding of tumor necrosis factor a, respectively (Black et al., 1997; Moss et al., 1997; Pan and Rubin, 1997; Qi et al., 1999). Although related by their overall domain structure, a considerable number of ADAMs can be distinguished by the absence of proteolytic activity and their precise functions need to be elucidated. At least 15 ADAMs have been described being expressed
0378-1119/02/$ - see front matter q 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0378-111 9(02)00508-5
204
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
either predominantly or specifically in testicular cells. This includes the sperm surface proteins ADAM 1 and 2 (fertilin a and b) as well as ADAM 3 (cyritestin), which have been assigned to be important for mediating integrin dependent adhesion between sperm and egg membranes during fertilization (Primakoff et al., 1987; Blobel et al., 1992; Evans et al., 1997a,b; Yuan et al., 1997). Recently, another subgroup of testis-specific ADAMs, the so called testases 1–3 (ADAM 24–26) was identified (Zhu et al., 1999). At least for testase 1, which is present on mature sperm cells as a monomer, a role for the penetration of the zona pellucida or sperm-egg fusion was suggested (Zhu et al., 2001). In a PCR-based screening for novel members of the ADAM family, we identified and cloned a novel mouse ADAM cDNA bearing closest homology with testase 3 (ADAM26) of the testase. Therefore we propose the name testase 4. Further PCR analysis revealed presence of testase 4 RNA in testes during puberty with highest levels in 7week-old mice. In situ analysis confirmed the presence of testase 4-specific signals in stage I–VIII spermatids of 6week-old mice but not in testes of 2.5-week-old animals. Therefore, we suppose a role of testase 4 during spermatogenesis or, possibly, for fertilization. 2. Materials and methods 2.1. Identification of ADAM cDNA fragments To identify novel putative ADAM cDNA-sequences, degenerate oligonucleotides corresponding to highly conserved ADAM-domains we have employed a PCRbased cloning protocol. We have isolated total RNAs from various mouse tissues using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers instructions, followed by reverse transcription with Superscript II polymerase (Gibco BRL). For PCR analysis, we have employed the cDNAs together with the degenerate primers SK-1 (5 0 CAC GAR YTI GGI YAY AMI YTN GG-3 0 corresponding to the HELGHTLG protein-sequence of the ADAM-Metalloprotease site) and SK-2 (5 0 -GWI CCR CAR TCR CAY TKY TC-3 0 corresponding to the QCDCGT consensussequence within the disintegrin-domain; I indicates an inosine residue). An approximately 250 bp PCR-fragment encoding for an ADAM-related sequence (clone K12-II) was specifically amplified and sequenced. A mouse testis cDNA library was screened by the Resource Center/Primary Database (RZPD) service with K12-II as the probe. Sequencing of five positive clones revealed two clones containing a K12-II-related, partial sequence (clones DKFZp411I16127 Q2 and DKFZp411N17196Q2). Both clones contained a poly(A) tail. 2.2. RACE–PCR To identify the missing 5 0 -sequence, we have employed a 5 -RACE strategy using the GeneRacer-Kit (Invitrogen, 0
Carlsbad) with the specific primer 5 0 -ATG ATG AAT GCC ATA TCT GAT AAC GA-3 0 on adult mouse testis RNAs (mouse strain C57BL/6). Separation of the PCR products on agarose gels revealed a strong specific band of approximately 1300 bp. Subcloning and sequencing of the RACE-product revealed a putative ATG start codon, a long open reading frame as well as an 100% identical overlap with the RZPD-clones. 2.3. RT–PCR For detailed RT–PCR analysis, we used specific primers (5 0 -GAA CCA CCG GAC TGT CAA CT-3 0 and 5 0 -TTT GAG TCT GGC AGC GAT TA-3 0 ), binding within the 3 0 -untranslated region of testase 4. We utilized total RNAs derived from various adult C57BL/6 mouse tissues and embryonic stages as well as total RNAs from various cell lines. Control PCRs were performed using primers specific for the house-keeping gene hypoxanthine–guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT). 2.4. In situ hybridization Testes were isolated from 2.5- and 6-week-old C57BL/6 mice, snap frozen in Tissue Tek (Sakura) and microtome sections were cut at 5–10 mm. In situ hybridizations were performed using 35S-labeled mRNA riboprobes as described previously (Sorokin et al., 1997). The sense and antisense probes correspond to nucleotides 1914–2542 of testase 4, cloned into the pCR II-TOPO vector (Invitrogen). Tissue sections were exposed for 4 weeks to Kodak NTB-1 emulsion and counterstained with toluidine blue. 2.5. DNA sequencing and in silico analysis All sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye DNA sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems) and appropriate primers using an ABI 310 DNA sequencer (Perkin Elmer, Foster City). Sequence analysis was performed using the Chromas software program (Technelysium Ltd, Helensvale, Australia) and sequence comparisons were done using BLAST. For transmembrane analysis, we employed the program TMHMM (Sonnhammer et al., 1998) to identify possible transmembrane domains of testase 4. Signal peptide analysis was performed using the program SignalP (Nielsen et al., 1997). 3. Results and discussion 3.1. cDNA cloning and sequence analysis of mouse testase 4 Members of the ADAM (A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease domain)-gene family encode for transmembrane proteins involved in the regulation of many biological processes such as cell adhesion, fertilization and myogenesis. At least some ADAMs are capable of processing recep-
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
205
Fig. 1. Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequence of testase 4 (GenBank accession number AF373288). The first methionine indicates the potential start codon of the suggested longest open reading frame.
206
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
tors and membrane linked ligands and are thought to play an essential role in Notch- and TNF-a signaling (Schlondorff and Blobel, 1999; Primakoff and Myles, 2000). Using degenerate primers in a PCR-based strategy to identify novel members of the ADAM family, we cloned and identified a novel putative mouse ADAM cDNA-sequence, whose 2608 base pairs contain an open reading frame, encoding a predicted protein of 714 amino acids (Fig. 1). The protein sequence shows 49% identity with testase 1 (ADAM 24), 52% identity with testase 2 (ADAM 25) and 82% identity with testase 3 in mouse, respectively. Since the sequence (GenBank accession number AF373288) bears closest homology to testase 3 (ADAM 26) (Zhu et al., 1999), we propose the name testase 4 (Fig. 2). 3.2. Amino acid sequence and structure of testase 4 The testase 4 cDNA displays all important features characteristic for a catalytic active member of the ADAM family: A signal sequence is adjacent to a pro-domain and a metalloprotease domain containing the putative conserved zinc-
dependent metalloprotease sequence HEMGHNLGMMHD corresponding to the consensus sequence HEXGHNLGXX HD described by Rawlings and Barrett (1995). The disintegrin domain is followed by the cysteine-rich domain, the EGF-like domain and by a short intracellular domain adjacent to the transmembrane sequence (Fig. 2). Interestingly, compared with ADAM 26 (testase 3), the putative testase 4 protein contains a longer signal peptide sequence with the start codon located 36 bp upstream of the translation start site of ADAM 26 (Figs. 2 and 3). Possible proteolytic activity of the predicted testase 4 protein is reflected by comparison with ADAM 9, ADAM 10 and ADAM 17, proteins which act as sheddases for specific membrane-anchored proteins (Schlondorff and Blobel, 1999). In detail, ADAM 17 appears to be capable to cleave Notch receptors (Brou et al., 2000) as well as tumor necrosis factor a, or transforming growth factor a (Black et al., 1997; Moss et al., 1997; Peschon et al., 1998). The minimal consensus sequence for a zinc-binding proteolytic site is the HEXXH motif found in active zinc peptidases of the metzincin superfamily (Jongeneel et al., 1989; Bode et al., 1993).
Fig. 2. Alignment of the predicted testase 4 protein and ADAM 24, 25 and 26 protein sequences (Thompson et al., 1994). The domain orientation within the sequence alignment of testase 4 with ADAMs 24, 25, 26 followed mainly the scheme used by Zhu et al. (1999). The boxed amino acid sequence represents the putative zinc-binding and catalytic site of testase 4. The underlined sequence depicts the putative transmembrane domain. Note: CLUSTALW-alignment was used with minor manual adaptations.
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
207
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree of selected mouse ADAMs and testase 4 (Saitou and Nei, 1987). Comparison of testase 4 protein with different mouse ADAMs. The CLUSTALW comparison analysis was used with the PAM250 residue weight table. ADAM3 (NM_009619.1); ADAM7 (NM_007402.1); ADAM8 (NM_007403.1); ADAM9 (NM_007404.1); ADAM10 (NM_007399.1); ADAM11 (NM_009613.1); ADAM12 (NM_007400.1); ADAM15 (NM_009614.1); ADAM17 (NM_009615.2); ADAM18 (NM_010084.1); ADAM19 (NM_009616.1); ADAM21 (NM_020330.1); ADAM22 (AB009674.1); ADAM23 (NM_011780.1); ADAM24 (NM_010086.1); ADAM25 (NM_011781.1); ADAM26 (AF167404.1); ADAM28 (AF153350.1).
Although many ADAMs nevertheless do not contain proteolytic activity, the HEMGHNLGMMHD motif of testase 4, indicative for catalytic activity of zinc-dependent metalloproteases, resembles the HELGHNFGAEHD sequence of ADAM 17 and the HEIGHNLGMSHD motif of ADAM 24, both active metalloproteases (Rawlings and Barrett, 1995). As is the case for ADAM 24, testase 4 does not contain a RX(K/R)R furin cleavage site between the pro-domain and the metalloprotease domain, which is found in most other ADAMs (Zhu et al., 2001). Furin-like convertases are responsible for cleaving the pro-domains of ADAMs which contain a furin cleavage motif. This happens typically during the intracellular transport to the cellular surface, in order to activate their metalloprotease activity. Nevertheless, since it has been shown for ADAM 24 that the removal of the pro-domain occurs at the cell surface and not intracellularly, we suggest a similar mechanism for the activa-
tion of testase 4. In this context, it has been speculated whether ADAM 24 modifies other sperm surface proteins during epididymal maturation or during fertilization (Zhu et al., 2001). This may be a possible function for testase 4 as well, perhaps with a different specificity in regard of the modified proteins. Several ADAMs expressed on the cellular surface of sperm cells are capable to mediate adhesion with mouse eggs. Various experiments suggest that ADAM 2, expressed on the cellular surface of mouse sperm, may be a major binding molecule of a6b1 integrin present on the egg (Almeida et al., 1995; Chen and Sampson, 1999; Chen et al., 1999). The notion that ADAMs expressed in the testis may be important for fertilization has been studied in detail for ADAMs 1–3. Instantly, male ADAM 2 or 3 knock-out mice are infertile due to defective sperm cells incapable to bind to the zona-pellucida (Cho et al., 1998, 2000; Shamsadin et al., 1999). As a putative transmembrane protein with a
Fig. 4. Expression pattern of mouse testase 4. (A) RT–PCR analysis of testase 4 expression in embryonic stages and in various tissues of adult C57BL/6 males using total RNA. Testase 4 is exclusively expressed in the testis. The lower band represents the amplified 190 bp cDNA-fragment of testase 4, the upper band the amplified 280 bp cDNA-fragment of HPRT (exon 2 to exon 4) used as a positive control. C ¼ H2O control. (B) RT–PCR analysis of testase 4 expression in testes of C57BL/6 males isolated 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 weeks after birth. The testase 4 PCR-product is found in various testis stages with highest levels in 7-week-old mice. The lower band represents testase 4 and the upper band the HPRT-control. C ¼ H2O control.
208
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
RGD consensus sequence, testase 4 has the potential to mediate integrin dependent cell adhesion via this motif. Nevertheless, of the three testases cloned before, only ADAM 24 contains an RGD-motif, but not the closer testase 4 homologs ADAM 26 or ADAM 25 which contain a QDEmotif instead. Regarding the various testases, this opens the possibility of their binding either to different integrins or to different integrin domains.
3.3. RT–PCR Using total RNA from embryonic stages and various adult murine tissues, RT–PCR analysis with testase 4-specific primers revealed a significant and specific amplification product only in testis (Fig. 4A). More thorough analysis, where we used total testis RNAs from different time points after birth, confirmed this finding. We identified low levels
Fig. 5. In situ hybridization of mouse testes. Testes from 2.5-week-old (A–C) and 6-week-old (D–L) old mice were examined by in situ hybridization using testase 4-specific antisense (A–I) and sense probes (J–L). Testase 4-specific signals were found only in 6-week-old testes using the antisense probe (D–I). The first column of pictures represents toluidine blue-stained tissue sections of representative areas and the second column shows silver grain staining in dark-field microscopy. The third column is an overlay of pictures from the first two columns. (G–I) A higher magnification representation of an area indicated by the rectangle in (F). Bars: 50 mm.
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
of the testase 4 PCR-product in all tested stages except of testes derived from 7-week-old mice (Fig. 4B) where high testase 4 levels were present. Testase 4 does not seem to participate in myoblast differentiation or fusion, since no RT–PCR-signals above background could be detected using RNAs from differentiating C2C12 cells. Neither is the testase 4 gene expressed in a variety of tested primary cells or lines from the mouse B- or T-cell lineage representing different developmental stages of maturation (data not shown). 3.4. In situ analysis When we used specific antisense probes from the 3 0 -end of testase 4 for in situ hybridization analysis, we found significant amounts of testase 4 mRNA within the seminiferous tubules of 6-week-old mice (Fig. 5D–I), whereas no specific signals were observable in testis of 2.5-week-old mice (Fig. 5A–C). The expression was limited to areas of round stage I–VIII spermatids (Russell et al., 1990) and no expression was detectable in areas of seminiferous tubules where spermatogonia and spermatocytes can be found. Applying the corresponding sense probe in control experiments, we were unable to observe significant staining (Fig. 5J–L). These results show a correlation of testase 4 expression with the maturation of spermatids in the adult testis. Most mammalian ADAMs show a wide tissue distribution, but at least 12 members of the family can be assigned to an expression predominantly in the testis, including ADAM 1–3 and ADAM 24–26. The distribution of testase 4 mRNAs within the seminiferous tubules, as shown by the in situ analysis (Fig. 5), may indicate a role for the development of early spermatids during stages I–VIII. Nevertheless, as was described in the case of the acrosomal protein cyritestin (ADAM 3), translation of testase 4 mRNA in the testis may be initiated only several days after the first appearance of the RNA (Linder et al., 1995). Therefore, a role for the testase 4 protein for later sperm cell function, rather than for germ cell maturation within the seminiferous tubules, is very well conceivable. This possible function could include a participation in integrin-dependent adhesion of the sperm cell with the egg or, in case proteolytic activity retains, a role in penetrating the zona pellucida during fertilization. It is obvious that sperm cells express various ADAMs on their surface which potentially can interact with several integrins on the egg. In future, careful binding studies and knock-out experiments will help to reveal possible binding partners of testase 4 and elucidate its function for sperm development and/or fertilization. 3.5. Conclusions 1. We have cloned and sequenced the cDNA for mouse testase 4, a novel ADAM family member. The cDNA consists of 2608 bp and the predicted open reading
209
frame encodes for 714 amino acids. 2. Expression of testase 4 mRNA was found only in mouse testis where it could be localized to around stage I–VIII spermatids.
Acknowledgements We would like to thank Friederike Pausch and Lydia Sorokin for valuable help performing the in situ hybridizations, Thomas Winkler for providing cDNAs of lymphoid tissues and cell lines, as well as the Resource Center/ Primary Database (RZPD) for screening and providing the mouse testis cDNA-clones. This work was supported by a grant of the Wilhelm-Sander-Foundation to K.v.d.M. and W.B. (# 99.029.1). References Alfandari, D., Wolfsberg, T.G., White, J.M., DeSimone, D.W., 1997. ADAM 13: a novel ADAM expressed in somitic mesoderm and neural crest cells during Xenopus laevis development. Dev. Biol. 182, 314– 330. Almeida, E.A., Huovila, A.P., Sutherland, A.E., Stephens, L.E., Calarco, P.G., Shaw, L.M., Mercurio, A.M., Sonnenberg, A., Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., et al., 1995. Mouse egg integrin alpha 6 beta 1 functions as a sperm receptor. Cell 81, 1095–1104. Black, R.A., et al., 1997. A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour necrosis factor-alpha from cells. Nature 385, 729–733. Blobel, C.P., 1997. Metalloprotease-disintegrins: links to cell adhesion and cleavage of TNF alpha and Notch. Cell 90, 589–592. Blobel, C.P., Wolfsberg, T.G., Turck, C.W., Myles, D.G., Primakoff, P., White, J.M., 1992. A potential fusion peptide and an integrin ligand domain in a protein active in sperm-egg fusion. Nature 356, 248–252. Bode, W., Gomis-Ruth, F.X., Stockler, W., 1993. Astacins, serralysins, snake venom and matrix metalloproteinases exhibit identical zinc-binding environments (HEXXHXXGXXH and Met-turn) and topologies and should be grouped into a common family, the ‘metzincins’. FEBS Lett. 331, 134–140. Brou, C., Logeat, F., Gupta, N., Bessia, C., LeBail, O., Doedens, J.R., Cumano, A., Roux, P., Black, R.A., Israel, A., 2000. A novel proteolytic cleavage involved in Notch signaling: the role of the disintegrin–metalloprotease TACE. Mol. Cell 5, 207–216. Chen, H., Sampson, N.S., 1999. Mediation of sperm-egg fusion: evidence that mouse egg alpha6beta1 integrin is the receptor for sperm fertilin beta. Chem. Biol. 6, 1–10. Chen, M.S., Almeida, E.A., Huovila, A.P., Takahashi, Y., Shaw, L.M., Mercurio, A.M., White, J.M., 1999. Evidence that distinct states of the integrin alpha6beta1 interact with laminin and an ADAM. J. Cell Biol. 144, 549–561. Cho, C., Bunch, D.O., Faure, J.E., Goulding, E.H., Eddy, E.M., Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., 1998. Fertilization defects in sperm from mice lacking fertilin beta. Science 281, 1857–1859. Cho, C., Ge, H., Branciforte, D., Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., 2000. Analysis of mouse fertilin in wild-type and fertilin beta(2/2) sperm: evidence for C-terminal modification, alpha/beta dimerization, and lack of essential role of fertilin alpha in sperm-egg fusion. Dev. Biol. 222, 289–295. Evans, J.P., Kopf, G.S., Schultz, R.M., 1997a. Characterization of the binding of recombinant mouse sperm fertilin beta subunit to mouse eggs: evidence for adhesive activity via an egg beta1 integrin-mediated interaction. Dev. Biol. 187, 79–93. Evans, J.P., Schultz, R.M., Kopf, G.S., 1997b. Characterization of the
210
B. Brachvogel et al. / Gene 288 (2002) 203–210
binding of recombinant mouse sperm fertilin alpha subunit to mouse eggs: evidence for function as a cell adhesion molecule in sperm-egg binding. Dev. Biol. 187, 94–106. Gould, R.J., Polokoff, M.A., Friedman, P.A., Huang, T.F., Holt, J.C., Cook, J.J., Niewiarowski, S., 1990. Disintegrins: a family of integrin inhibitory proteins from viper venoms. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 195, 168– 171. Huang, T.F., Holt, J.C., Lukasiewicz, H., Niewiarowski, S., Trigramin, A., 1987. low molecular weight peptide inhibiting fibrinogen interaction with platelet receptors expressed on glycoprotein IIb–IIIa complex. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16157–16163. Jongeneel, C.V., Bouvier, J., Bairoch, A., 1989. A unique signature identifies a family of zinc-dependent metallopeptidases. FEBS Lett. 242, 211–214. Linder, B., Bammer, S., Heinlein, U.A., 1995. Delayed translation and posttranslational processing of cyritestin, an integral transmembrane protein of the mouse acrosome. Exp. Cell Res. 221, 66–72. McLane, M.A., Marcinkiewicz, C., Vijay-Kumar, S., Wierzbicka-Patynowski, I., Niewiarowski, S., 1998. Viper venom disintegrins and related molecules. Proc Soc Exp. Biol. Med. 219, 109–119. Moss, M.L., et al., 1997. Cloning of a disintegrin metalloproteinase that processes precursor tumour necrosis factor-alpha. Nature 385, 733–736. Myles, D.G., Kimmel, L.H., Blobel, C.P., White, J.M., Primakoff, P., 1994. Identification of a binding site in the disintegrin domain of fertilin required for sperm-egg fusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 4195– 4198. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G., 1997. A neural network method for identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Int. J. Neural Syst. 8, 581–599. Pan, D., Rubin, G.M., 1997. Kuzbanian controls proteolytic processing of Notch and mediates lateral inhibition during Drosophila and vertebrate neurogenesis. Cell 90, 271–280. Peschon, J.J., et al., 1998. An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development. Science 282, 1281–1284. Primakoff, P., Hyatt, H., Tredick-Kline, J., 1987. Identification and purification of a sperm surface protein with a potential role in sperm-egg membrane fusion. J. Cell Biol. 104, 141–149. Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., 2000. The ADAM gene family: surface proteins with adhesion and protease activity. Trends Genet. 16, 83–87. Qi, H., Rand, M.D., Wu, X., Sestan, N., Wang, W., Rakic, P., Xu, T., Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., 1999. Processing of the notch ligand delta by the metalloprotease Kuzbanian. Science 283, 91–94. Rawlings, N.D., Barrett, A.J., 1995. Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases. Methods Enzymol. 248, 183–228. Rooke, J., Pan, D., Xu, T., Rubin, G.M., 1996. KUZ, a conserved metalloprotease–disintegrin protein with two roles in Drosophila neurogenesis. Science 273, 1227–1231.
Russell, L.D., Ettlin, R.A., Sinha Hikim, A.P., Clegg, E.D., 1990. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL. Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425. Schlondorff, J., Blobel, C.P., 1999. Metalloprotease–disintegrins: modular proteins capable of promoting cell–cell interactions and triggering signals by protein-ectodomain shedding. J. Cell Sci. 112, 3603–3617. Shamsadin, R., Adham, I.M., Nayernia, K., Heinlein, U.A., Oberwinkler, H., Engel, W., 1999. Male mice deficient for germ-cell cyritestin are infertile. Biol. Reprod. 61, 1445–1451. Sonnhammer, E.L., von Heijne, G., Krogh, A., 1998. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 6, 175–182. Sorokin, L.M., Pausch, F., Durbeej, M., Ekblom, P., 1997. Differential expression of five laminin alpha (1–5) chains in developing and adult mouse kidney. Dev. Dyn. 210, 446–462. Stocker, W., Grams, F., Baumann, U., Reinemer, P., Gomis-Ruth, F.X., McKay, D.B., Bode, W., 1995. The metzincins – topological and sequential relations between the astacins, adamalysins, serralysins, and matrixins (collagenases) define a superfamily of zinc-peptidases. Protein Sci. 4, 823–840. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J., 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680. Wen, C., Metzstein, M.M., Greenwald, I., 1997. SUP-17, a Caenorhabditis elegans ADAM protein related to Drosophila KUZBANIAN, and its role in LIN-12/NOTCH signalling. Development 124, 4759–4767. Wolfsberg, T.G., Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., White, J.M., 1995. ADAM, a novel family of membrane proteins containing A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease domain: multipotential functions in cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. J. Cell Biol. 131, 275–278. Yagami-Hiromasa, T., Sato, T., Kurisaki, T., Kamijo, K., Nabeshima, Y., Fujisawa-Sehara, A., 1995. A metalloprotease–disintegrin participating in myoblast fusion. Nature 377, 652–656. Yuan, R., Primakoff, P., Myles, D.G., 1997. A role for the disintegrin domain of cyritestin, a sperm surface protein belonging to the ADAM family, in mouse sperm-egg plasma membrane adhesion and fusion. J. Cell Biol. 137, 105–112. Zhu, G.Z., Lin, Y., Myles, D.G., Primakoff, P., 1999. Identification of four novel ADAMs with potential roles in spermatogenesis and fertilization. Gene 234, 227–237. Zhu, G.Z., Myles, D.G., Primakoff, P., 2001. Testase 1 (ADAM 24) a plasma membrane-anchored sperm protease implicated in sperm function during epididymal maturation or fertilization. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1787–1794.