Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: Diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks

Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: Diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks

Accepted Manuscript Title: Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: diversity, preva...

963KB Sizes 0 Downloads 18 Views

Accepted Manuscript Title: Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks Author: Angelika Fruth Rita Prager Erhard Tietze Wolfgang Rabsch Antje Flieger PII: DOI: Reference:

S1438-4221(15)00083-1 http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.020 IJMM 50982

To appear in:

Please cite this article as: Fruth, A., Prager, R., Tietze, E., Rabsch, W., Flieger, A.,Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing human disease in Germany: diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks, International Journal of Medical Microbiology (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.020 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

1

MINI-REVIEW

2 3

Molecular epidemiological view on Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli causing

4

human disease in Germany: diversity, prevalence, and outbreaks

5

Angelika Fruth, Rita Prager, Erhard Tietze, Wolfgang Rabsch, and Antje Flieger

ip t

6 7

Division of Enteropathogenic Bacteria and Legionella, National Reference Centre for

9

Salmonella and other Enteric Bacterial Pathogens, Robert Koch Institute, Wernigerode Branch, Burgstr. 37, 38855 Wernigerode, Germany

an

11

us

10

cr

8

12

M

13 14

ed

15

ce pt

16 17 18

Ac

19 20

Corresponding author:

21

Antje Flieger

22

Phone: +49 (0)30 18754 2522

23

Fax: +49 (0)30 18754 4207

24

e-mail: [email protected]

25 26 27 1 Page 1 of 26

Summary

29

Infections by intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) are among those causing a high

30

mortality and morbidity due to diarrheal disease and post infection sequelae worldwide. Since

31

introduction of the Infection Protection Act in Germany 2001, these pathogens rank third

32

among bacterial infections of the gastrointestinal tract. As a major pathovar Shiga toxin-

33

producing E. coli (STEC) which include enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) play a leading

34

role in occurrence of sporadic cases and disease outbreaks. An outstanding example is the

35

large outbreak in spring 2011 caused by EHEC/EAEC O104:H4. To monitor and trace back

36

STEC infections, national surveillance programs have been implemented including activities

37

of the German National Reference Centre for Salmonella and other Enteric Bacterial

38

Pathogens (NRC). This review highlights advances in our understanding of STEC in the last

39

20 years of STEC surveillance by the NRC. Here important characteristics of STEC strains

40

from human infections and outbreaks in Germany between 1997 and 2013 are summarized.

an

us

cr

ip t

28

41

Key words

43

STEC, EHEC, HUS, serovar, phage type, diversity, outbreak investigations, antibiotic

44

resistance

ed

M

42

45

Introduction

47

The German National Reference Centre for Salmonella and other Enteric Bacterial Pathogens

48

(NRC) hosted by the Robert Koch Institute Division of Enteropathogenic Bacteria and

49

Legionella has been surveilling important bacterial diarrheal pathogens causing disease in

50

humans

51

http://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/NRZ/Salmonellen/salmo_node.html;jsessionid=1D05B5

52

E97ACCB8543EF4E41721E3E0E4.2_cid381). Our intention is to obtain an overview about

53

the strain types and their prevalence, virulence, antibiotic resistance, and persistence. Further,

54

changes in the pathogen types are recognized which may be indicative of new emerging or

55

disappearing strain variants and may give a hint on outbreaks. Outbreak detection is

56

performed in cooperation with the department of infection epidemiology of the Robert Koch

57

Institute and other partners, such as the Consultant Laboratory for Hemolytic Uremic

58

Syndrome (HUS) at the University of Münster, the Public Health Authorities of the German

59

Federal States and the Federal Institute of Risk Assessment (BfR). Upon strain comparison

60

and by means of specific strain properties also infection sources can be traced together with

ce pt

46

1993

(Homepage:

Ac

since

2 Page 2 of 26

61

other public health, food or veterinary authorities. The NRC further is involved in the

62

development and improvement of diagnostic procedures.

63

Within the 20 years of the work of the NRC, more than 12,000 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli

65

(STEC) isolates were collected and thoroughly analyzed yielding in a comprehensively

66

studied strain collection. The term STEC is used throughout this article for strains of both,

67

typical enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) serovars which are highly associated with sequelae

68

like hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and HUS, involving thrombocytopenia, haemolytic anemia, and

69

acute renal failure, and many other serovars which are only rarely associated with severe

70

human disease. With respect to intestinal pathogenic E. coli microbiology, pathogenicity,

71

clinical issues, and evolution, the reader is referred to a recently published comprehensive

72

review (Croxen et al., 2013) and therefore, we here will concentrate on EHEC surveillance at

73

NRC. Within the period of STEC surveillance, the strains analyzed at NRC represent about

74

60-80% of the reported cases in Germany ranging from mild or bloody diarrhea up to HUS.

75

To the purpose of strain characterization, bacterial isolates are mainly sent from public health

76

authorities and in some cases from primary diagnostic laboratories to the NRC for subtyping.

77

At the NRC, a variety of classical phenotypic as well as DNA-based methods are used.

M

an

us

cr

ip t

64

ed

78

In the case of STEC, strain isolation is currently rarely performed in primary diagnostic

80

laboratories. The procedure is very labour intensive and in most cases the determination of the

81

presence of the Shiga toxin or its genes from stool samples or enrichment cultures is sufficient

82

for therapeutic decisions and case reporting according to the German Infection Protection Act.

83

Therefore, isolation of the pathogen and further subtyping is usually performed in specialized

84

or reference laboratories. Phenotypic and DNA-based subtyping is performed on STEC

85

isolates for E. coli pathovar determination and for clone differentiation for epidemiological

86

purposes. A broad spectrum of established mostly PCR-based methods for the detection of

87

virulence determinants, such as adhesin or toxin genes and their variants, is employed for

88

pathovar characterization (see table 1; Flieger et. al., 2013). These PCR-based detections of

89

gene regions are important methods for epidemiological analysis of STEC however cannot

90

evaluate functionality of gene expression or of the corresponding proteins since non-

91

functional degenerated gene mutants have been described (Abu-Ali et al., 2010). Strain

92

subtyping by means of serotyping either via classical or genoserotyping and by

93

biochemotyping, such as sorbitol fermentation, is carried out for all STEC isolates sent to the

94

NRC. Further, international standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after DNA

Ac

ce pt

79

3 Page 3 of 26

95

macrorestriction is still the method of choice for reliable identification of outbreak-associated

96

STEC clones. Serotyping, PCR-based virulence gene profiling, and PFGE analysis were

97

important tools applied during the 2011 EHEC/EAEC O104:H4 outbreak for characterization

98

of the outbreak strain and for tracing of infection clusters (Bielaszewska et al., 2011; Frank et

99

al., 2011; Sin et al., 2013; Robert Koch Institute, 2011). In this review, we present a summary of important characteristics of STEC isolated from

101

human infections in Germany between 1997 and 2013. Used abbreviations and gene names

102

with respect to STEC subtyping are explained and referenced in Table 1.

cr

103

ip t

100

STEC O serogroups causing human disease

105

Serotyping is an important method for STEC subtyping. At the NRC classical serotyping is

106

performed as described by Ørskov and Ørskov (Ørskov and Ørskov, 1984). So far 186

107

O serogroups (O1-O192 except O31, O47, O67, O72, O93 and O94) and 53 associated

108

H forms (H1-56 except H13, H22, H50) are currently described (see WHO Center for

109

Klebsiella and Escherichia coli, Copenhagen, Denmark for further information). Within the

110

here reported period, 139 different O serogroups were detected among STEC strains. Most

111

commonly found O serogroups among STEC were O157, O91, O26 and O103 which

112

represent about 40 to 50% of the STEC strains analyzed at NRC starting from 1999 (Fig. 1).

113

Excluding 2011, this shows that there are no major changes in O serogroup distribution and

114

consequently in their significance in human disease. It is also obvious that the percentage of

115

O157 strains decreased from about 25% in 1999 to about 10% in 2013. This may reflect the

116

growing awareness of other STEC serogroups in diagnostics rather than a significant decrease

117

in O157 infections. Accordingly, the fraction of O91 strains increased from about 5% in 1999

118

to about 15% in 2012 and 2013. The large outbreak due to EHEC/EAEC O104:H4 in 2011

119

highly influenced O serogroup distribution by representing about 50% of the strains analyzed

120

in that year. Most frequent H type combinations of the most important O serogroups were

121

O157:Hnm/H7, O91:Hnm/H14, O26:Hnm/H11, and O103:H2 (Table 2). It is further

122

interesting to note that about 10% of the strains yearly are either untypable or cannot be

123

attributed to a known O serogroup which shows a limitation of classical serotyping compared

124

to DNA-based methods addressing coding genes for expression of serotype-related traits.

Ac

ce pt

ed

M

an

us

104

125 126

In summary, O26, O91, O103, and O157 were the most common O serogroups occurring

127

among STEC from 1997 to 2013 and only slight changes in their distribution can be observed. 4 Page 4 of 26

128

Except in 2011, the large outbreak due to EHEC/EAEC O104:H4 dominated O serogroup

129

percentages (Fig. 1).

130

STEC and association with stx genotypes, with HUS, and occurrence of hybrid

132

pathovars

133

In the early 1990s, the historical approach to assign the pathovar STEC to strains of specific

134

serovars needed certain revisions. Because of the dynamic nature of the Shiga toxin-

135

harboring phages and the limited chance to detect these pathogens later during infection,

136

different assays based on detection of Shiga toxin and Shiga toxin genes improved the capture

137

of diverse STEC. By application of such specific virulence gene PCR assays, the NRC

138

collected a great variety of STEC serovars and virulence gene profile since 1999 (Fig. 1 and

139

Table 3). In addition to known correlations of most frequent serovars with stx1 (such as O26 or

140

O91 strains) or stx2 (such as O157 strains), changes in stx gene type distribution were

141

observed. For example, stx2 gene positive isolates of serovar O26:H11/Hnm emerged with an

142

increasing tendency to harbour different stx2 genes. Only 7% of STEC O26:H11/Hnm

143

harboured stx2 in 1999 but 59% in 2013 (Fig. 2; Bielaszewska et al., 2013).

M

an

us

cr

ip t

131

ed

144

Due to the awareness of severe outcome of STEC infection, the HUSEC strain collection was

146

established and published by Mellmann et al. (2008). It represents the most common strains

147

isolated from patients suffering from HUS. Various HUS-associated isolates belonging to

148

additional serovars were identified by the NRC (Table 3). Among these are isolates of

149

serovars O177:H11, O156:H25, O109:Hnt, and O80:H2 carrying stx2a and eaeA genes.

150

Further, this includes the first description of an O181:H49 isolate with a variety of virulence-

151

associated genes (stx1a, stx2a, stx2c, stx2d, sub and saa).

Ac

152

ce pt

145

153

Genomic plasticity and horizontal gene transfer enable emergence of STEC strains with

154

additionally acquired virulence properties of intestinal or extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli

155

(Müller et al., 2007; Orth et al., 2007). Such hybrid forms of STEC and other pathovars were

156

targeted by PCR analysis of additional virulence genes at the NRC. Accordingly, two novel

157

STEC strains of serovars O59:Hnm and Orough:Hnm were identified harbouring virulence

158

genes involved in aggregative adhesion characteristic for EAEC (Table4; Prager et al., 2014).

159

Further, novel strains carrying stx2g and estIa were described which represent a hybrid variant

160

of STEC and ETEC (Table 4; Prager et al., 2011). 5 Page 5 of 26

Phage typing of STEC

162

Typing of E.coli by lysis pattern caused by specific bacteriophages is described for O157 and

163

other serovars (Milch, 1978). Additionally for the serovar O157, a Canadian system was

164

developed by Ahmed et al. (1987) and extended by Khakhria et al. (1990). This scheme was

165

used widely as a tool for epidemiological investigations in Canada, the United States,

166

England, Wales, and Scotland. From 2001 till 2009, this Canadian scheme which describes 88

167

distinct phage types by application of sixteen different phages (Duck et al., 1997) was used at

168

the NRC. 826 tested strains of serovar O157 from Germany collected between 2001 and 2009

169

yielded in 30 different phage types. During this time, the dominant phage types were PT8

170

(30%), PT88 (20%), PT14 (15%), PT 2 (12 %), PT 4 (5%), and 18% belonged to 25 different

171

PTs (Fig. 3). The distribution of stx1 and stx2 phages among the different phage types was

172

interesting. For example, the strains of sorbitol-fermenting (sf) O157:Hnm PT88 carried in

173

100% and of O157 PT2 in 96% the stx2 phage only.

an

us

cr

ip t

161

174

Phage typing was also helpful for epidemiological analysis in outbreak investigations. In

176

2001, an outbreak in the German Federal State Saxony-Anhalt caused by sf O157/Hnm STEC

177

of PT88 was observed in a kindergarden. Among 12 patients several HUS cases occurred.

178

STEC sf O157:Hnm of PT 88 have been observed in several outbreaks in Germany, yet their

179

reservoir and routes of transmission remain unknown (Alpers et al., 2009). In 2008 an

180

outbreak by STEC O157 PT14 was traced back to raw milk and children who visited a farm in

181

Lower Saxony were affected (Kirchner et al., 2013).

ed

ce pt

182

M

175

With the introduction of new molecular subtyping methods, the future of STEC phage typing

184

is under debate. But for a scientific view on STEC prophages which carry additional genes

185

(e.g. virulence genes like stx1, stx2) or for the application of the next generation of

186

bacteriophage therapy (Lu and Koeris, 2011), the available sets of phages may be helpful.

187

Ac

183

188

Antibiotic resistance among STEC

189

Antibiotic treatment of EHEC infections is problematic and controversial and is not regularly

190

recommended especially during the acute diarrhoeal phase but is for certain cases, such as

191

pathogen-shedding without clinical symptoms, under debate (Serna et al., 2008, Nitschke et

192

al., 2012). Nevertheless, at the NRC, the susceptibility of STEC towards 16 antimicrobial

193

substances is determined by a broth microdilution method routinely to obtain the antibiogram 6 Page 6 of 26

of the pathogens in order to use it as an epidemiological marker. The breakpoints for the

195

classification “resistant” are mainly according to DIN and were not adapted to any of the

196

more recent updates by CLSI or EUCAST, respectively, in order to maintain consistency in

197

our epidemiological surveillance of antibiotic resistance development. The substances tested

198

include tetracycline (4 mg/l), ampicillin (8), mezlocillin (16), the combination of mezlocillin

199

with sulbactam (16), chloramphenicol (8), the combination of trimethoprim and

200

sulfamethoxazole – cotrimoxazole – (16), streptomycin (16), kanamycin (16), gentamicin (4),

201

amikacin (16), nalidixic acid (16) ciprofloxacin (2), cefotiam (4), cefoxitin (16), cefotaxime

202

(8) and ceftazidime (16). Since 1997, among all of the STEC sent to the NRC, a rather

203

constant yearly proportion of around 70% is tested susceptible to all of these substances (Fig.

204

4). Between 15 and 20% are resistant to one or two antibiotics, and about 10% of STEC

205

isolates are resistant to three and more - rarely up to 13 - of the substances tested. The most

206

frequently observed resistance phenotypes are resistance towards streptomycin, tetracycline

207

and ampicillin (about 15 to 20% of all resistant STEC) followed by resistance towards

208

chloramphenicol (about 10% of all resistant STEC). Resistance of STEC towards

209

fluorchinolones varied over the years below one percent of all resistant STEC reaching 0.7 %

210

cumulated for the years 2012 and 2013. A clearly increasing trend is observed for resistance

211

towards cotrimoxazole. While between 1997 and 2004 about 7% of all resistant STEC

212

showed this resistance phenotype, the respective proportion of cotrimoxazole-resistant STEC

213

rose to over 12% during the period between 2005 and 2011 and reached about 30% cumulated

214

for the years 2012 and 2013. Another trend that seems to be looming is a rising resistance

215

quotient among STEC for cephalosporins as mediated by extended spectrum beta lactamases

216

(ESBL). While up to the year 2010 the proportion of STEC with an ESBL phenotype

217

(reduced susceptibility or resistance towards cefotaxime and/ or ceftazidime) remained below

218

1%, this proportion rose up to 4% of all resistant STEC cumulated for the years 2012 and

219

2013. A very prominent example of an STEC with an ESBL phenotype is the O104:H4 strain

220

which caused the large EHEC outbreak in Germany in 2011. This strain harbored the gene for

221

the ESBL enzyme CTX-M-15 on a plasmid (Robert Koch Institute, 2011). Plasmid-encoded

222

CTX-M-15 is widely distributed in many E. coli strains of different pathovars (Rocha-Garcia

223

et al., 2015, Ewers et al., 2014). Other STEC isolates with an ESBL phenotype were from

224

sporadic cases and were serotyped as O80:H2, O179:H8, O80:Hnt and O16:Hnt. Thus,

225

although selection pressure towards resistant STEC by therapeutic use of antibiotics in

226

clinical cases can be assumed to be low, the surveillance of antibiograms at the NRC reveals

227

the continuous prevalence of antibiotic resistant STEC in Germany over the past 16 years.

Ac

ce pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

ip t

194

7 Page 7 of 26

228

One must assume, therefore, that these pathogens are subject to ecological processes creating

229

and selecting antibiotic resistant strains in their reservoirs.

230

STEC surveillance and outbreak investigations

232

The NRC uses for the surveillance, outbreak investigations and identification of new

233

emerging STEC types different molecular approaches such as virulence gene PCR assays,

234

PFGE, MLST, MLVA and plasmid profile analysis. Because there is no single combination of

235

virulence genes that defines STEC as potential EHEC, a broad range of virulence genes is

236

investigated by PCR. After the 2011 EHEC O104:H4 outbreak, the panel of the routinely

237

tested stx and eaeA genes was extended by the EAEC genes aatA and aggR.

us

cr

ip t

231

238

For surveillance and to predict risks of STEC infections, the knowledge of the stx subtypes

240

and colonization factors and adhesins is essential. The NRC uses the stx subtyping strategies

241

and nomenclature as described by Scheutz et al. (2012). The NRC as national public health

242

reference laboratory also participates every year in the EQA ring trials coordinated by the

243

ECDC, Stockholm, covering the detection of stx1, stx2, eaeA, aggR and aaiC genes and

244

subtyping of stx1 into three known subtypes (stx1a, stx1c, stx1d) and stx2 genes into seven

245

known subtypes (stx2a, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, stx2f, stx2g). It is well known that some stx

246

subtypes, especially variant stx2a, in combination with eaeA or with aatA/aggR are often

247

associated with severe clinical outcomes (e.g. sf O157:Hnm or O104:H4; Tables 3 and 5;

248

Werber et al., 2003). But other virulence gene combinations may also be associated with

249

severe disease in humans, including HUS (see Table 3). Therefore predicting the emergence

250

of „new‟ highly pathogenic STEC types based only on the presence of the stx genes, or by

251

focusing on a restricted panel of serogroups alone is not possible (Orth et al., 2006; Prager et

252

al., 2005; Fasel et al., 2014). The STEC virulence plasmids (pO157, psfO157 or pO113) also

253

play an important role in severe clinical outcomes. Especially eaeA-negative isolates

254

possessing plasmids of type pO113 (Srimanote et al., 2002) in combination with variant stx2d

255

were more often described in correlation with HUS (see Tables 3 and 5). Therefore the NRC

256

uses the plasmid profile analysis as an important tool for surveillance and outbreak

257

investigations, not only for analysis of STEC. Thus it could be shown by the NRC very early

258

that the EAEC virulence plasmids and the plasmid profiles in the outbreak strain EHEC

259

O104:H4 and HUSEC O104:H4 were different (EHEC O104:H4

260

Erregers sowie Hinweise und Hilfestellungen des RKI zur Diagnostik des gegenwärtig

Ac

ce pt

ed

M

an

239

- Eigenschaften des

8 Page 8 of 26

261

zirkulierenden

262

http://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/E/EHEC/EHEC_O104/EHEC_O104_Diagnostik.pdf?_

263

_blob=publicationFile; Mellmann et al., 2011).

264

DNA macrorestriction and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for the subtyping of STEC

265

is widely used to compare strains for epidemiological purposes. The method currently

266

represents the gold standard for the investigation of outbreaks and source-tracing. The NRC

267

uses the standardized PFGE protocol developed by the CDC Atlanta which is part of EQA’s

268

coordinated by the ECDC Stockholm. The NRC as national public health reference laboratory

269

has been successfully participating every year in these EQA’s covering the gel quality and gel

270

analysis by means of BioNumerics (BioNumerics, Applied Math, Ghent, Belgium). This

271

standardized method is a basic requirement to contribute to the international molecular typing

272

pilot project of the ECDC with the aim to detect molecular clusters. The NRC takes an active

273

part in this pilot project. Serovar-specific PFGE library databases based on the restriction with

274

XbaI were established at the NRC for the most important STEC serovars showing severe

275

clinical outcomes and involvement in outbreaks, such as (sf) O157:H7/Hnm, O26:H11/Hnm,

276

O145:Hnm, O103:H2/Hnm. This is an essential precondition for the detection of outbreaks,

277

molecular clusters, or new clones. Altogether, by PFGE 500 (sf and non-sorbitol-fermenting

278

(nsf)) O157:H7/Hnm isolates were subtyped into 265 different patterns, 250 O26:H11/Hnm

279

isolates into 142 patterns, 120 O103:H2/Hnm isolates into 53 patterns and 48 O145:Hnm

280

isolates into 30 patterns. In case of an outbreak, PFGE analysis is done with a second enzyme

281

(BlnI) as recommended by CDC (PulseNet International, 2013). During outbreak

282

investigations or for cluster detections, the NRC works together with the department of

283

Infectious Disease Epidemiology of the Robert Koch Institute and the National Reference

284

Laboratory for E. coli at the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), especially

285

for source tracing. The universal applicability of PFGE for subtyping of isolates other than the

286

most common serovars was shown (Prager et al., 2009, 2011; Bielaszewska et al., 2011;

287

Frank et al., 2011). In addition to PFGE, the NRC also uses for the investigations of genetic

288

relationships MLVA and MLST analysis and in the future the application of whole genome

289

sequencing and the verification of the method in outbreak analysis will be compassed (Prager

290

et al., 2009, 2011).

Available:

Ac

ce pt

ed

M

an

us

cr

ip t

Ausbruchstammes,

291 292

Conclusions

293

We here presented an overview on the characteristics of the STEC strains isolated from

294

human disease in Germany during the last 17 years. STEC comprise strains with a high 9 Page 9 of 26

potential to cause severe symptoms in humans and outbreaks in association with consumption

296

of contaminated food. At the beginning of that period, classical serotyping with a focus on

297

O157 strain detection was a major method for STEC risk assessment. Today, analysis of a

298

wide array of virulence or phylogenetic markers by DNA-based methods together with

299

serotyping allows a more complete view on the pathogen’s virulence profile and phylogeny.

300

In the future, a more complete picture will arise from the implementation of transcriptomics,

301

proteomics, and whole genome sequencing. Especially the latter is currently in progress at

302

NRC and has the potential to revolutionize STEC surveillance and outbreak analysis.

303

However, the established methods will certainly remain in use for the near future, both to

304

serve the diagnostic and epidemiological needs of the public health system and to complement

305

the genome-based approaches in the process of their evaluation.

us

cr

ip t

295

306

Acknowledgements

308

We thank the team members of the Robert Koch Institute Division of Enteropathogenic

309

Bacteria and Legionella for their contributions to subtyping of bacteria and preparation of the

310

manuscript. We further are indebted to all the diagnostic laboratories providing strains for

311

epidemiological analysis.

ed

312

M

an

307

References

314

Abu-Ali, G.S., Ouellette, L.M., Henderson, S.T., Lacher, D.W., Riordan, J.T., Whittam, T.S.,

315

Manning, S.D., 2010. Increased adherence and expression of virulence genes in a lineage

316

of Escherichia coli O157:H7 commonly associated with human infections. PLoS One 5

317

(4).e10167.

319

Ahmed, R., Bopp, C., Borczyk, A., Kasatiya, S., 1987. Phage-typing scheme for E. coli 0157:

Ac

318

ce pt

313

H7. J. Infect. Dis. 155, 806-809.

320

Alpers, K., Werber, D., Frank, C., Koch, J., Friedrich, A.W., Karch, H., an der Heiden, M.,

321

Prager, R., Fruth, A., Bielaszewska, M., Morlock, G., Heissenhuber, A., Diedler, A.,

322

Gerber, A., Ammon, A., 2009. Sorbitol-fermenting enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli

323

O157:H- causes another outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in children. Epidemiol.

324

Infect. 137, 389-395.

325

Bielaszewska, M., Mellmann, A., Zhang, W., Köck, R., Fruth, A., Bauwens, A., Peters, G.,

326

Karch, H., 2011. Characterisation of the Escherichia coli strain associated with an outbreak 10 Page 10 of 26

327

of haemolytic uraemic syndrome in Germany, 2011: a microbiological study. Lancet

328

Infect. Dis. 11(9):671-676. Bielaszewska, M., Mellmann, A., Bletz, S., Zhang, W., Köck, R., Kossow, A., Prager, R.,

330

Fruth, A., Orth-Höller, D., Marejková, M., Morabito, S., Caprioli, A., Piérard, D., Smith,

331

G., Jenkins, C., Curová, K., Karch, H., 2013. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli

332

O26:H11/H-: a new virulent clone emerges in Europe. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013 56(10), 1373-

333

1381.

ip t

329

Boisen, N., Struve, C., Scheutz, F., Krogfelt, K.A., Nataro, J.P., 2008. New adhesin of

335

enteroaggregative Escherichia coli related to the Afa/Dr/AAF family. Infect. Immun.

336

76(7), 3281-3292.

339

us

338

Croxen, M.A., Law, R.J., Scholz, R., Keeney, K.M., Wlodarska, M., Finley, B.B., 2013. Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. CMR 26, 822-880.

an

337

cr

334

Duck, D., Demczuk, W., McKinnon, J., Mulvey, M., Clarke, C., Woodward, D., Khakhria, R., Ahmed, R., 1997. Escherichia coli O157: H7 phage typing. Natl . Lab. Enteric Pathogens,

341

Lab. Centre Dis. Control, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 4/1/97.

M

340

Dudley, E.G., Thomson, N.R., Parkhill, J., Morin, N.P., Nataro, J.P., 2006. Proteomic and

343

microarray characterization of the AggR regulon identifies a pheU pathogenicity island in

344

enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 61(5), 1267-1282.

ed

342

Ewers, C., Stamm, I., Pfeifer, Y., Wieler, L.H., Kopp, P.A., SchØnning, K., Prenger-

346

Berninghoff, E., Scheufen, S., Stolle, I., Günther, S., Bethe, A., 2014. Clonal spread of

347

highly successful ST15-CTX-M-15 Klebsiella pneumoniae in companion animals and

348

horses. J. Antimicrobial. Chemother. 69 (10), 2676-2680.

ce pt

345

Fasel, D., Mellmann, A., Cernela, N., Hächler, H., Fruth, A., Khanna, N., Egli, A., Beckmann,

350

C., Hirsch, H.H., Goldenberger, D., Stephan, R., 2014. Hemolytic uremic syndrome in a

351

65-Year-old male linked to a very unusual type of stx2e- and eae-harboring O51:H49 shiga

352

toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52 (4), 1301-1303.

Ac

349

353

Flieger, A., Mielke, M., Tietze, E., 2013. Role of pathogen surveillance and subtyping in

354

outbreak recognition of food-borne bacterial infections. Microbiological perspective -

355

Aims,

356

Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 56(1), 42-46.

methods

and

prospects

of

pathogen

subtyping.

Bundesgesundheitsblatt

11 Page 11 of 26

357

Frank, C., Werber, D., Cramer, J.P., Askar, M., Faber, M., an der Heiden, M., Bernard, H.,

358

Fruth, A., Prager, R., Spode, A., Wadl, M., Zoufaly, A., Jordan, S., Kemper, M.J., Follin,

359

P., Müller, L., King, L.A., Rosner, B., Buchholz, U., Stark, K., Krause, G., HUS

360

Investigation Team, 2011. Epidemic profile of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli

361

O104:H4 outbreak in Germany. New Engl. J. Med. 365(19), 1771-1780. Frost, J.A., Smith, H.R, Willshaw, G.A., Scotland, S.M., Gross, R.J., Rowe, B., 1989.

363

Phagetyping of Verocytotoxin (VT) producing E. coli O157 isolated in the United

364

Kingdom. Epidemiol. Infect. 103, 73- 81.

cr

366

Khakhria, R., Duck, D., Lior, H., 1990. Extended phage typing scheme for E. coli O157:H7. Epidemiol. Infect. 105, 511-520.

us

365

ip t

362

Kirchner, M., Dildei, C., Runge, M., Brix, A., Claussen, K., Weiss, U., Fruth, A., Prager, R.,

368

Mellmann, A., Beutin, L., Miko, A., Wichmann-Schauer, H., Pulz, M., Dreesman, J., 2013.

369

Outbreak of non-sorbitol-fermenting shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157:H7 infections

370

among school children associated with raw milk consumption in Germany. Archiv für

371

Lebensmittelhygiene 64, 68-74.

374 375

M

the hag gene encoding flagellin of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 168, 1479–1483.

ed

373

Kuwajima, G., Asaka, J.-I., Fujiwara, T., Node, K., Kondo. E.,1986. Nucleotide sequence of

Lu, T.K., Koeris, M.S., 2011. The next generation of bacteriophage therapy. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 14, 524-31.

ce pt

372

an

367

Lu, Y., Iyoda, S., Satou, H., Satou, H., Itoh, K., Saitoh, T., Watanabe, H., 2006. A new

377

immunoglobulin-binding protein, EibG, is responsible for the chain-like adhesion

378

phenotype of locus of enterocyte effacement-negative, shiga toxin-producing Escherichia

379

coli. Infect. Immun. 74(10), 5747-5755.

380 381

Ac

376

Milch, H., 1978. Phage Typing of Escherichia coli. In: Bergan, T., Norris, J.R. (Eds.), Microbial Methods, CHAPTER III, Academic Press London, pp. 87-156.

382

Mellmann, A., Bielaszewska, M., Koeck, R., Friedrich, A.W., Fruth, A., Middendorf B.,

383

Harmsen, D., Schmidt, M.A., Karch , H., 2008. Serotypes and Phylogenetic Analysis of

384

the Collection of Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome-Associated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia

385

coli (HUSEC). EID 14(8), 1287-1290.

386

Mellmann, A., Harmsen, D., Cummings, C.A., Zentz, E.B., Leopold, S.R., Rico, A., Prior, K.,

387

Szczepanowski, R., Ji, Y., Zhang, W., McLaughlin, S.F., Henkhaus, J.K., Leopold, B., 12 Page 12 of 26

388

Bielaszewska, M., Prager, R., Brzoska, P.M., Moore, R., Guenther, S., Rothberg, J.M.,

389

Karch, H., 2011. Prospective genomic characterization of the German enterohemorrhagic

390

Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak by rapid next generation sequencing technology. PloS

391

One 6(7), e22751. Müller, D., Greune, L., Heusipp, G., Karch, H., Fruth, A., Tschäpe, H., Schmidt, M.A., 2007.

393

Identification of unconventional intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates expressing

394

intermediate virulence factor profiles by using a novel single-step multiplex PCR. Appl.

395

Environ. Microbiol., 73(10), 3380-3390.

cr

ip t

392

Nada, R.A., Armstrong, A., Shaheen, H.I., Nakhla, I., Sanders, J.W., Riddle, M.S., Young, S.,

397

Sebeny, P., 2013. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of enterotoxigenic

398

Escherichia coli isolated from U.S. military personnel participating in Operation Bright

399

Star, Egypt, from 2005 to 2009. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 76(3), 272-277.

an

us

396

Nielsen, S., Frank, C., Fruth, A., Spode, A., Prager, R., Graff, A., Plenge-Bönig, A. Loos, S.,

401

Lütgehetmann, M., Kemper, M.J., Müller-Wiefel, D.E., Werber, D., 2011. Desperately

402

seeking diarrhoea: outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome caused by emerging sorbitol-

403

fermenting shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H-, Germany, 2009. Zoonoses

404

Public Health. 58(8), 567-572.

ed

M

400

Nitschke, M., Sayk, F., Härtel, C., Roseland, R.T., Hauswaldt, S., Steinhoff, J., Fellermann,

406

K., Derad, I., Wellhöner, P., Büning, J., Tiemer, B., Katalinic, A., Rupp, J., Lehnert, H.,

407

Solbach, W., Knobloch, J.K., 2012. Association between azithromycin therapy and

408

duration

409

enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O104:H4. JAMA 307 (10), 1046-1052.

of

ce pt

405

bacterial

shedding

among

patients

with

Shiga

toxin-producing

Ørskov, F., Ørskov, I.,1984. Serotyping of Escherichia coli. Methods Microbiol. 14, 43-112.

411

Orth, D., Grif, K., Khan, A.B., Naim, A., Dierich, M.P., Würzner, R., 2007. The Shiga toxin

412

genotype rather than the amount of Shiga toxin or the cytotxicity of Shige toxin in vitro

413

correlates with the apparence of the hemolytic syndrome. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 59,

414

235-242.

Ac

410

415

Orth, D., Grif, K., Fisher, I., Fruth, A., Tschäpe, H., Scheutz, F., Dierich, M.P., Würzner, R.,

416

2006. Emerging Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotypes in Europe: O100:H- and

417

O127:H40. Curr. Microbiol. 53(5), 428-429.

13 Page 13 of 26

418

Prager, R., Annemüller, S., Tschäpe, H., 2005. Diversity of virulence patterns among shiga

419

toxin-producing Escherichia coli from human clinical cases – need for more detailed

420

diagnostics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 295, 29-38. Prager, R., Fruth, A., Siewert, U., Strutz, U., Tschäpe, H., 2009. Escherichia coli encoding

422

Shiga toxin 2f as an emerging human pathogen. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 299(5), 343-353.

423

Prager, R., Fruth, A., Busch, U., Tietze, E., 2011. Comparative analysis of virulence genes,

424

genetic diversity, and phylogeny of Shiga toxin 2g and heat-stable enterotoxin STIa

425

encoding Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals, and environmental sources. Int.

426

J. Med. Microbiol. 301(3), 181-191.

cr

ip t

421

Prager, R., Lang, C., Aurass, P., Fruth, A., Tietze, E., Flieger, A., 2014. Two Novel

428

EHEC/EAEC Hybrid Strains Isolated from Human Infections. PLoS One. 9(4), e95379.

429

PulseNet International, 2013. Standard operating procedure for PulseNet PFGE of

430

Escherichia coli O157:H7, Escherichia coli non-O157 (STEC), Salmonella serotypes,

431

Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri. PNL05. PulseNet International, Atlanta, GA.

432

http://www.pulsenetinternational.org/assets/PulseNet/uploads/pfge/PNL05_Ec-Sal-

433

ShigPFGEprotocol.pdf.

an

M

Robert Koch Institute, 2011. Characteristics of the pathogen and information and assistance

ed

434

us

427

435

by

436

http://www.rki.de/EN/Home/EHECO104.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.

438

RKI

in

diagnosis

of

the

currently

circulating

outbreak

strain.

ce pt

437

the

Robert Koch-Institut, 2011. Bakteriologische Untersuchungen im Rahmen des Ausbruchs mit E. coli O104:H4. Epid. Bull. 35, 325-329. Rocha-Garcia, R.C., Cortés-Cortés, G., Lozano-Zarain, P., Belo, F., Martínez-Laguna, Y.,

440

Torres, C., 2014. Faecal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy dogs harbour CTX-M-15

441

and CMY-2 ß-lactamases. Vet. J. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.12.026.

Ac

439

442

Scheutz, F., Teel, L.D., Beutin, L., Piérard, D., Buvens, G., Karch, H., Mellmann, A.,

443

Caprioli, A., Tozzoli, R., Morabito, S., Strockbine, N.A., Melton-Celsa, A.R., Sanchez, M.,

444

Persson, S., O'Brien, A.D., 2012. Multicenter evaluation of a sequence-based protocol for

445

subtyping Shiga toxins and standardizing Stx nomenclature. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 2951-

446

2963.

447 448

Serna, A. 4th, Boedeker, E.C., 2008. Pathogenesis and treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 24 (1), 38-47. 14 Page 14 of 26

449

Sin, M.A., Takla, A., Flieger, A., Prager, R., Fruth, A., Tietze, E., Fink, E., Korte, J., Schink,

450

S., Höhle, M., Eckmanns, T., 2013. Carrier prevalence, secondary household transmission,

451

and long-term shedding in 2 districts during the Escherichia coli O104:H4 outbreak in

452

Germany, 2011. J. Infect. Dis. 207(3), 432-438. Srimanote, P., Paton, A.W., Paton, J.C., 2002. Characterization of novel type IV pilus locus

454

encoded on the large plasmid of locus of enterocyte effacement-negative Shiga-toxigenic

455

Escherichia coli strains that are virulent for humans. Infect. Immun. 70 (6), 3094-3100.

456

Toma, C., Martínez Espinosa, E., Song, T., Miliwebsky, E., Chinen, I., Iyoda, S., Iwanaga,

457

M., Rivas, M. 2004. Distribution of putative adhesins in different seropathotypes of Shiga

458

toxin-producing Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42(11):4937-46.

us

cr

ip t

453

Werber, D., Fruth, A., Buchholz, U., Prager, R., Kramer, M.H., Ammon, A., Tschäpe, H.,

460

2003. Strong association between shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 and

461

virulence genes stx2 and eae as possible explanation for predominance of serogroup O157

462

in patients with haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22(12),

463

726-730.

M

an

459

Ac

ce pt

ed

464

15 Page 15 of 26

Table 1. Gene names and abbreviations used Descriptions

Reference

stx (stx1a,1c,1d,2a,2b,2c,2d,2e,2f,g)

shiga toxin gene(s)

Scheutz et al. (2012)

aggR, aatA, agg3A, agg3C, aggA, aggC, hda

genes associated with aggregative adhesion

Boisen et al. (2008)

aaiC

Type six secretion substrate gene

Dudley et al. (2006)

estIa

heat-stable enterotoxin gene

Nada et al. (2013)

eaeA

Intimin gene

Schmidt et al. (1993)

fliC

flagellin gene

Kuwajima et al. (1986)

saa

autoagglutinating adhesin gene

eibG

immunoglobulin-binding protein gene Lu et al. (2006)

sfpA

major subunit of Sfp fimbriae gene

Friedrich et al. (2004)

sub

subtilase cytotoxin gene

Paton et al. (2004)

toxB

virulence gene involved in adhesion located on pO157 plasmid

Toma et al. (2004)

O-antigen

surface antigen

Ørskov and Ørskov (1984)

H-antigen

flagellar antigen

nm

non motile

-

nt

not typeable

-

sf/nsf 466 467 468

cr

Paton et al. (2001)

us

an

M

ed

ce pt

PT

ip t

Genes / Abbreviations

Ørskov and Ørskov (1984)

phage type

-

sorbitol fermenting/ non-sorbitol fermenting

-

Ac

465

16 Page 16 of 26

Table 2. Most frequently observed combinations of O and H antigens among human STEC isolates between 1997 and 2013 (NRC collection)

M

an

us

cr

11/40 4/8/10/14/21/25/28/49 21 6/12/31 7/nt nm/21/32 21 nm/11/18 nm/4/7/21 8 6/11/21/28 nm/8 nm/12 nm/2/10 25/28/34 nm/8/10/31 nm/1/7 nm/21/24/28/35 45

ip t

other H antigens

ce pt

5 8 26 55 76 80 91 103 104 111 113 115 118 128 145 146 156 157 174 177

H-antigen most frequently observed nm nm/19 nm/11 nm/7 nm/19 2 nm/14 2 unknown nm nm/4 10 16 2 nm 21/28 25 nm/7 2/8 nm/11

ed

O-antigen

Ac

469 470

17 Page 17 of 26

ip t cr

stx1

stx2

eaeA

ehxA

O103:H2 O103:H2

+/1a +/1a

+/2a +/2d

+ +

+ +

O104:H4

-

+/2a

-

-

O104:H4

-

+/2a

-

-

O109:Hnt O111:Hnm O113:H21 O128:H2 O132:H2

+/1a +/1c +/1a

+/2a +/2a +/2a +/2b -

+ + +

O145:Hnm

-

+/2a

O156:H25

-

O157:Hnm

-

O157:H7 O157:H7 O177:H11 O181:H49 O26:H11

+/1a +/1a +/1a

Selected accessory virulence genes*

d

M

an

Serovar

us

Table 3. HUS-associated serovars and their main virulence gene profile among human STEC isolates between 1997 and 2013 (NRC collection), * Selected accessory virulence genes were determined in certain strains

aggR, aatA, agg3A, agg3C aggR, aatA, aggA, aggC

Related strains in HUSEC Collection HUSEC 7: O103:H2 HUSEC 7: O103:H2 HUSEC 41: O104:H4 HUSEC 41: O104:H4

saa, sub

HUSEC 12: O111:Hnm HUSEC 26: O113:H21 HUSEC 28: O128:H2

+

+

toxB

HUSEC 22: O145:Hnm, HUSEC 36: O145:Hnm

+ /2a

+

+

+/2c

+

+

sfpA

HUSEC 6: O157:Hnm, HUSEC 4: O157:Hnm

+/2a +/2a+2c +/2a +/2a+2c+2d +/2a

+ + + +

+ + + + +

toxB toxB toxB saa, sub,

Ac

ce

pt e

+ + + -

HUSEC 3: O157:H7

HUSEC 17: O26:H11 18 Page 18 of 26

ip t stx2

eaeA

ehxA

O26:H11

-

+/2a

+

+

O55:H7

-

+/2a

+

-

O80:H2 O91:H14 O91:H21 O98:Hnm

+/1a +/1a

+/2a +/2d+2c -

+ -

+ + + +

d

M

an

HUSEC 18: O26:H11

pt e

+/2a +/2b +/2a

+ +

eibG saa aatA

HUSEC 5: O55:H7

HUSEC 34: O91:H21 HUSEC 30: O98:Hnm

saa

ce

+

Related strains in HUSEC Collection

Ac

Ont:Hnt Orauh:Hnm +/1a Orauh:Hnm -

cr

stx1

us

Serovar

Selected accessory virulence genes*

19 Page 19 of 26

ip t cr

Table 4. Observed hybrid pathovars among human STEC isolates from 1997 to 2013 and associated virulence gene pattern (NRC strain collection) Virulence pattern

Serovar

EHEC/EAEC

stx2a , aggR, aatA, aggA, aggC

O104:H4

EHEC/EAEC

stx2a , aggR, aatA, agg3A, agg3C

O104:H4

EHEC/EAEC

stx2a , aggR, aatA, hdaA, hdaC

O59:Hnm

Prager et al. (2014)

STEC/EAEC

stx2b , aatA

Orough:Hnm

Prager et al. (2014)

STEC/ETEC

stx2e , estIa

O100:Hnm, Ont:H21, Ont:Hnm

This study

STEC/ETEC

stx2g , estIa

O2:H28, O15:H16, O136:Hnm, O175:H28, Ont:H16, Ont:Hnm

This study and Prager et al. (2011)

References Robert Koch Institute (2011) Mellmann et al. (2008)

Ac

ce

pt e

d

M

an

us

Pathovar combinations

20 Page 20 of 26

ip t cr

Year Epidemiological cluster / suspected source of infection

an

Serovar and shigatoxin-type (phage type) O146:H21 stx2

us

Table 5. Selected outbreak events in Germany, data of NRC in cooperation with State Public Health Institutes and Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, BfR D/BD

HUS

Death Reference

4

0

0

NRC data

7

0

0

NRC data

23

2

0

Kirchner et al. (2013)

private party / unknown

O103:H2 stx1

2008

kindergarden / unknown

O157:H7 (PT 14) stx2

2008

tent camp / consumption of raw milk

O55:H7 stx1

2008

kindergarden / unknown

7

0

0

NRC data

O76:H19 stx1

2009

private party / consumption of mutton

3

0

0

NRC data

sf O157:Hnm (PT 88) stx2

2009

school and kindergarden / human-to-human-transmission

2

7

1

Nielsen et al. (2009)

O26:H11 stx2

2010

regional cluster /consumption of contaminated soft cheese

0

3

0

NRC data

O55:H7 stx2 O113:Hnt stx2

d

pt e

ce

Ac

O104:H4 stx2

M

2008

2011

outbreak / fenugreek seeds

2987

855

53

Frank et al. (2011)

2012

family cluster / unknown

4

1

0

NRC data

2013

family cluster / visit of a petting zoo

2

1

1

NRC data

21 Page 21 of 26

Figure Legends Figure 1. Major O serogroup distribution of human STEC isolates between 1997 and 2013 (NRC strain collection) Figure 2. Occurrence of different stx gene subtypes for most common STEC serovars between 1997 and 2013 (NRC strain collection), *O26:H21 and O91:H21 represent rarely

ip t

found O/H combinations, see also Table 2

Figure 3. Occurrence of different phage types among STEC O157 strains between 2001 and

cr

2009 (NRC strain collection), *possible bias due to outbreaks in following years: 2001,

Saxony-Anhalt, sf O157:Hnm , PT 88; 2006, Northern Germany, sf O157:Hnm, PT 88; 2007,

us

Saxony and Bavaria, O157:Hnm, PT 8; 2008, Lower Saxony, O157:H7, PT 14; 2009, Lower

an

Saxony and Hamburg, sf O157:Hnm, PT 88; 2009, Baden-Wuerttemberg, O157:Hnm, PT8

Figure 4. Percentage of antibiotic resistant strains among STEC isolates from human stool

M

samples and food sources (NRC strain collection); numbers for 2011 adjusted for outbreak

Ac

ce pt

ed

isolates, the strains from food sources contributed to a maximum of about 10% of total strains

22 Page 22 of 26

i cr us 739

892

840

M an

367

946

777

735

582

365

337

390

352

2352

619

466

ce pt

ed

278

Ac

n = 24

Page 23 of 26

86

120

133

128

137

118

81

65

53

50

61

29

100

56

40

28

39

47

62

59

32

38

32

145

107

M an

us

69

cr

i

O157:Hnm/H7

n= 3

37

O26:Hnm/H11/H21*

45

103

125

76

87

27

75

91

112

106

73

84

72

47

Ac

ce pt

ed

n= 9

n= 1

O91:H14/Hnm/H21* 20

79

85

76

36

42

69

Page 24 of 26

i cr us M an 128

137

ed

133

118

81

65

53

50

61

Ac

ce pt

n=

Page 25 of 26

i cr us 416

816

911

M an

278

885

964

837

783

601

381

319

392

335

819

552

438

Ac

ce pt

ed

n = 24

Page 26 of 26