' Variable
Equation N""bo<
G,ow
4
Growth
S
Rate of
Constant
3.69 (1.23)
bm
""-,
Y·I
0.33
0.35
(1.41)
(2.09)
7.66
-o.rn
(2.29)
(-0.26)
0.44 (263)
Adj.
Durbin h
R'
Statistic
0.19
4.55
0.19
3.65
GOP
Note: bm is percentage change in broad money over four quarters.
TABLE 3 REGRESSION RESULTS: 1979(3) - 1987(1)
Dependent Variable
Growth Rate of
Equation NlEber
6
COOst....t
"'·1
Durbin h Stuistic
Y·I
6.73
-oms
0.47
(2.10)
(-0.27)
(2.14)
0.18
1.41
0.18
1.28
GOP
G,ow
7
6.70 (2.2S)
-0.37
0.48
(-0.27)
(28S)
Note: be is percentage change in bank credit over four quarters.
Economic Analysis and Policy
236
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
The regression results of the growth of monetary aggregates are superior to the results of the growth of bank credit. However, Lhe stability of these relationships has to be examined in the recent period when deregulation caused rapid growth of monetary aggregates.
3.2 Financial In/ennediaries' Credit (FIC) Financial intermediaries' credit includes the credit extended by banks and NBFls. This measure of credit does not include direct financing between the non·financial sector and hence it is not as broad as the Reserve Bank's measure of debt which was discussed earlier. The growth of FIC is closely related to the growth of broad money since these two aggregates reflect the major portion of assets and liabilities of financial intermediaries. The relationship betwccn the growlh of FIC and broad money and the stability of the velocity of FIC are shown in Figures 5 and 6. Table 4 shows the regression results or growth or GDP and FIe.
Figure 5 Broad Money and FIe (percentage change over four quarters)
",-------------------------,
" " "
•
" "
. " "
• sow
J S
W J
1979
sow
J S D W J S
IoIJSOWJS
1985
1981 []
IIRO,/,(} WONEY
j.
riC
•
237
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Figure 6
Velocity or Fie
......, ••• .....,.., u
t
g " ~
.... ,
,..• 0.'
0.' 0.' o.~
0.' 0.'
-
~ ~ ~ ~"........ ~"-e-....,.,-=...
0.' 0.'
o+'rr-~rr~--r~ ...~"rr-~rr~"rr-rr~,.,--r~r SO" J S
1918
L~
J 5
6..
J
~
6..
J 5 II t.I J
1980
~
6
M J
1982
~
t ..
J
~
t ..
J
~~
1':0184
.. J
~
tM
1986
TABLE 4 REGRESSION RESULTS: 1979(3) • 1987(1)
Dq>ond
Growth Rate of
Equation Number
Constanl
8
4.S9 (LSI)
9
1,10 (2.3S)
roo
ftq
0.11 (0.6S)
'-I
Adj.
Durbin h
R2
Statistic
0.47 (2.86)
0.19
1.40
0.50 (2.99)
0.19
0.81
GDP Gn>W1h Rate of
-0.08 (-0.46)
GDP
Note: fie is percenlage change in fmancial intermediaries' credit over four quaners.
238
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Comparison of the above results with the results of monetary aggregates indicates better overall performance of money over credit This result is in contrast with that of Friedman (1982b) who found no support for the preference of money over credit in the US. Friedman's measure of credit was defined as the tOlal indebtedness of the non-financial sector which is broader than the above measure of credit.
4. Stability or the Relationships There is strong evidence to suggest that the stability of the relationship between money and income has changed as a result of the recent rapid deregulation of financial markets. The growth of M3 accelerated in 1984-85, despite finn financial conditions. On a JUlle-to-June basis, M3 grew 17.4 per cent in 1984-85, compared to 10.8 per cent in 1983-84. The major contributing facLors to lhis rapid growth were a shift in the pattern of financing within financial intennediaries and a move away from direct financing. A Reserve Bank discussion paper summarised the discussions of a "meeting on monetary issues" and attempted Lo isolate any significant change in the demand for money in recent periods [Reserve Bank of Australia (1985)]. The paper updated regression results of several studies and compared the actual and predicted growth rates of M3. Generally. the updated regressions under-predicted the growth of M3 in
1984·85. The report suggested that under-prediction by various models of demand for M3 may indicate rapid growth of the actual values of M3 in 1984-85. This method will be used to examine the seability of the relationships between growth of GDP and financial aggregates which were presented in Tables ll0 4. Figures 7 to 10 show the residuals of regressions 1,2,4 and 8 from Tables I to 4. In every case the regressions tended to under-predict in 1983-84 and overpredict in 1984-85 and 1985-86. These results appear to be consistent with the rapid growth of monetary and credit aggregates in recent periods. The rapid growth of the acLual values of the independent variables lead to large forecast values. of dependent variables. This causes the residuals to become negative and large in absolute value. The usual tests of stability (such as the Chow lest) require sufficient numbers of observaHons before and after the shift. One possible test is the usc of dummy variables. Dummy variables may be used to identify any significant change in the slopes or interccpL tenns of the regression equations. This test was applied to the regression equations 1, 2 and 8 (in Tables 1 to 4) in order to examine the possibility of any significant change in the slope over the period beginning 1984·
85(1). The results are reponed in Table 5.
239
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Figure 7 Residuals of Equation 1
• •
, ,
Iv
r-~
o
1\ 11
-,
11
-, -,
-.
-,
,.~J
I
',.:..I
I
a
,~J
om.".,
' I
,~J
' I
,:.l
I!{SlOu.o.u
Figure 8 Residuals of Equation 2
• •
,
, 1""\
o
I~
'A ),;'\j
-,
~
-,
-. -
-,
, I 1918
,-
'J
'M'
' I
'M.
' I
'M'
240
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Figure 9 Residuals of Equation 4
• • <
, ,
}
1"-1
,
V\j
-.
\
'"
('
VI
-, -, -<
-.
I
V
.-
,, , ,, , ,, , , , , , , , 1
,,, ,,, ,,,
,
Figure 10 Residuals of Equation 8 <
• <
, ,
111
~
,
\
)1
~J\.
•
., -,
V
-, -<
-'
,
.1 o
llUAI!T(JIS
II(SIOUAlS
,
.. '
V 'M'.. '
241
TABLE 5
Oq>
a",".n'
m3
m3. 1
fie
D
Y·l
Ad'
R~
Durbin h Slalistic
0,,1
from:
Growlh
2.09
0.22
~.11
0.53
(2.31 )
(3.09)
(-1.61)
0.64 (8.33)
0.61
Rate of
198485(3)
-0.12 (·1.65)
0.62 (7.92)
0.60
0.15
1985-
-0.15 (-2.40)
0.30 (1.94)
0.26
GDP
2.21 (2.47)
Growlh Rate of GDP
3.07 (0.99)
0.2.2 (2.99)
0.43 (1.97)
86(1)
1.86
1984· 85(1)
Note: The sample periods for the above regressions are as the same as those repe)Jted in Tables 1 to 4.ln the equation = a + bX + cDX. D = a from lhe beginning of the sample period up to the quarter specified in this table. and = 1 from the beginning of thal quarter to the end of the sample period.
b
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Growlh Rate of GDP
Economic Analysis and Policy
REGRESSION RESULTS: INCLUDING DUMMY VARIABLES
242
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Significant coefficients for the dummy variables in Table 5 may indicate that the relationship between economic activity and financial variables has changed. This development has caused the financial aggregates to become a misleading indicator of changes in the economy.
5. Alternative Targets and Indicators Poole (1970) showed that interest ·rate targets are preferable when the source of instability originates from the financial sector and monetary targets are preferable when the real sector was unstable. In Poole's analysis the preference of one policy target over another was determined by the minimisation of variation in GOP. With widespread deregulation of financial markets in Australia and with instability in the relationship between financial variables and GDP, interest rates may be an appropriate choice of target. The difficulty with interest rate targeting is detennining the real interest rate, i.e. the nominal interest rate adjusted for the expected inflation. Since expected inflation is not observable, real interest rates may not be known precisely. However, nominal interest rates may be used as an indicator of monctary policy. Recently the Reserve Bank of Australia has suggested looking at a "check list" for detcnnining the stance of monelary policy. The "check list" includes a wide range of financial and economic variables such as monetary aggregates, interest rates, the exchange rate, the external account, asset prices, inflation and inflationary expectations. By introducing the "check list" the Reserve Bank has left the actors in markets to use their own judgments about the stance of the policy. The direction of change in the variables included in the check list may indicate the degree of finnncss of the monetary policy. Phillips (1985) argued that changes in shoft-tenn interest rates are important in indicating any significant change in financial conditions. A rise in short-tenn interest rales, other factors remaining constant, may indicate a tighter monetary JX>licy. However, interest rates may also be affected by other variables. Phillips stated that " ... accepting the need for care in interpretation, changes in interest rates (or lack of change) arc valuable indicators of changes in financial condition and of the impact of the Bank's operations" (Phillips (1985) p.13]. These statements may indicate that since the suspension of monetary targeting the Bank has relied on the movements of short-tenn interest rates as a guide to its stance of monetary policy.
6. Conclusions Deregulation of financial markets caused rapid growth of M3 and changed the relationship between M3 and economic activity. This development has led to the suspension of the conditional projection of M3 in January 1985. The Reserve Bank emphasised the irnJX>rtance of relying on a wide range of aggregates as an indicator of the stance of policy. This requires a substantial amount of judgment for deducing any conclusions based upon movements of several aggregates. In addition the staff
243
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
of the Research Department of the Reserve Bank. introduced a measure of the indebtedness of the non-financial sector which attempts to provide useful information about changes in financial conditions. Unfortunately the data on the proposed measure of debt are not very reliable and are only available annually with a long delay.
The growth of monetary and credit aggregates appears to have a significant influence on the growth of economic activity. However, the empirical results of this study show a significant change in the relationship between financial aggregates and GDP in recent periods. These results do not provide suppon for choosing a single aggregate as an indicator and 13.rget in the transitional period of deregulation. There is some evidence that the Reserve Bank. has emphasised the movements of shan-term interest rates as an indicator of the changes in financial conditions. However, in interpreting the movements Of shan-term rates one must use judgment to isolate the extent to which rates are affccted by factors other than the Bank's monetary policy.
Rderences Davis, R.G. (1979) "Broad Credit Measures as Targets for Monetary Policy", Quarlerly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York. VolA No.2, pp.13-22.
Friedman, 8.M. (1982a) "Time to Re-examine the Monclary Targets Framework.", New England Economic Review, March/April, pp.15-23. Friedman, B.M. (1982b) "Monetary Policy with a Credit Aggregate Target", National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No.989. Friedman, B.M. (1982c) "Money, Credit and Non-Financial Economic Activity, an
Empirical Study of Five Countries", National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No.1033. Horne, J. and Monadjemi, M. (1985) "Debt, Credit and Monetary Targeting in Australia", Economic Record, Vol.61 No.173, pp.522-34. Kaufman, H. (1978) Testimony Before the House of Representatives Committee on the Budget, February 6. Marzouk, G.A. (1987) The Flow of Funds and Monelary Policy in Australia, (Australian Professional Publications, Sydney). Mohl, A. (1985) "Changing Pallerns of Financing", Reserve Bank of Australia Bullelin, May, pp.737-43.
244
Economic Analysis and Policy
Vol. 18 No. 02, September 1988
Phillips, M.J. (1985) "Monetary Policy from the Inside", Reserve Bank of Auslra/ia Bu//elin. November, pp.9-13. Poole, W. (1970) "Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model", Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol.84 No.2, pp.197-216.
Reserve Bank of Australia (1985) "Meeting on Monetary Issues", Discussion Paper No.8502, November. Valentine, T. (1983) "Monetary Targeting Revisited", Bulletin of Money. Banking
and Finance, No.2, pp.I-41.