Monoclonal antibodies to chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins

Monoclonal antibodies to chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins

Chemosphere, Vol.15, Nos.9-12, P r i n t e d in G r e a t B r i t a i n pp 2 O O 7 - 2 0 1 0 , 1986 0 0 4 5 - 6 5 3 5 / 8 6 $3.00 + .OO P e r g a m...

178KB Sizes 0 Downloads 82 Views

Chemosphere, Vol.15, Nos.9-12, P r i n t e d in G r e a t B r i t a i n

pp 2 O O 7 - 2 0 1 0 ,

1986

0 0 4 5 - 6 5 3 5 / 8 6 $3.00 + .OO P e r g a m o n J o u r n a l s Ltd.

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES TO CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-DIOXINS

S.J. Kennel,

G. Mason and S. Safe

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Division of Biology, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830 Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX

77843

ABSTRACT

A thyroglobulin conjugate of dioxin (thyroglobulin-2 adipamide, 3,7,8-trichlorodibenzop-dioxin) (TG-TCDD) was used to immunize BALB/c mice. Hybridomas were produced by cell fusion between immune spleen cells and mouse myelomas SP2/O, P3, or NSI. In order to screen the thousands of resultant cultures for production of MoAb, a rapid, solid phase radioimmunoassay for antibody to dioxins was developed. This involved attaching bovine serum albumin coupled with trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (BSA-TCDD) to polystyrene plates to be used as a solid phase target antigen for reaction with MoAb. Fourteen hybridomas were identified that produced MoAb reacting with BSA-TCDD but not with BSA alone. Antibodies were tested for binding to BSA-aniline to eliminate those with limited binding specificity. Initial studies indicated that most MoAbs bound BSA-aniline as well as BSA-TCDD. More detailed analyses indicated that while most MoAbs showed some reaction with BSA-aniline, two showed preferential binding to BSA-TCDD of more than 200 fold whereas rabbit antisera demonstrated only a 5-fold discrimination. MoAb 391-IB was purified from mouse ascites fluid and after radioiodination, was tested for direct binding to BSA-TCDD or BSA-aniline. 125I MoAb showed no significant binding to BSA-aniline while demonstrating high binding to BSA-TCDD (Ka : 4.5 x 10~1/mole). Experiments are in progress to use these MoAbs to develop sensitive radioimmunoassays or enzyme linked assays specific for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. INTRODUCTION

The utility of a radioimmunoassay

for 2,3,7,8-TCDD and related

compounds

using

polyclonal antibodies has previously been reported (I). This paper briefly summarize our initial studies on the development of monoclonal antibodies to polychlorinated dibenzo-pdioxins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hybridoma

Production

Female BALB/c mice

were

immunized

with

2-aminc-3,7,8-

trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin conjugated to thyroglobulin (154 dioxin molecules/thyroglobulin) (TG-TCDD).

Two different protocols were used for different fusions.

Protocol I:

Animals

immunized ip on day -15 and -7 (prior to sacrifice and harvesting of spleen cells on day 0) with 100 ug of T G - T C D D e m u l s i f i e d in 100 ul complete Freund's adjuvant and on days -3, -2, and -I with 400 ug of TG-TCDD emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (2). Protocol If:

2007

2008

Animals were immunized sc and id with 100 ug of TG-TCDD emulsified in 100 ul complete Freund's adjuvant weekly for four weeks.

For the last 3 days of the fifth week, animals were

boosted each day with 100 ug of TG-dioxin ip in phosphate buffered saline (PBS).

Animals

were sacrificed on the day following the third ip booster. Fusions of imm~me spleen cells and mouse myeloma cells were conducted by the method of Fazekas de St. Groth (3) using parent myelomas P3-X63-Ag8 (P3), SP2/O or NS-I and spleen cells pooled from two immunized animals (either protocol I or II). Hybridomas were screened for antibody production using the solid state radioimmunoassay described below. Antibody Preparations ammonium

Concentrated hybridoma culture fluids (25X) were prepared by

sulfate precipitation and stored at -20oc.

Purification of MoAb 391-IB was

accomplished by a m m o n i u m sulfate precipitation and ion exchange chromatography on DEAE cellulose (DE52; Whatman).

Purified MoAb was radioiodinated with chloramine T and 125I and

freed of aggregates by gel filtration on Ultrogel AcA 34 before use in direct binding experiments (6). Purification and radioiodination of goat antibodies to mouse or rabbit Immtmoglobulin G (IgG) were conducted as described previously (6). Solid Phase Radioimmunoassay

Bovine serum albumin

conjugate of 2-amino-3,7,8-

trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (BSA-TCDD) and other protein conjugates were coupled to Immulon II microtest plates (Dynatech) through a bridge to poly-1-1ysine (PLL) (7). Immulon plates were incubated with 50 ul/well of 100 ug PLL per ml of PBS for I h.

Wells were washed and treated

for 5 min with I% gluteraldehyde in PBS before washing and addition of I ug/well of BSA-TCDD or other conjugates in 50 ul PBS. After incubation on a 60° rotating platform (at 60 rpm) at 4oc for 18 h, blocking solution (100 ul of 25 mg/ml BSA in PBS) was added for a minimum of I h before use in binding tests or storage at -20oc for later use. For indirect binding tests, 50 ul of antibody solution (serum, ascites fluid, hybridoma culture fluid or purified MoAb) diluted in cell growth medium containing 205 fetal bovine serum was added per well and allowed to incubate for 2 h at 4°C before washing and addition of I u g radiolabelled secondary antibody (125I goat antibody to rabbit or mouse IgG) in 50 ul of BSA at 5 mg/ml of PBS.

After incubation of 2 h at 4°C, wells were washed, separated and

analyzed for 125I in a Searle automatic gamma scintillation counter.

A summary of the

binding for several MoAbs is summarized in Figure I. For direct binding assays radioiodinated MoAb 391-IB was diluted in growth medium containing 205 fetal bovine serum and added to wells in 50 ul. the wells were washed and analyzed for 125I.

After Binding for 3 h at 4°C

Values for double reciprocal plots and

determination of binding constants (Ka) were calculated as previously described (8).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The 2-amino-3,7,8-trichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin BSA conjugate has been linked to a solid plate support and used to screen thousands of cultures for the production of MoAb.

Fourteen

hybridomas that produced MoAb reacting with BSA-TCDD but not with BSA were identified; two

2009

A

30-

20

~~O'~BSA_TCD D

10

.o

°BSA amhne f

r

,

c"

0 Z

10-B



------.~

0 133 >C3 0 130

81" 6~ 4~

t-Z

2-,~BSA-aniline

>Oc

°

~o5.C"

i

\ "'---..~BSA-TCDD

i o

~]

\BSA-TCDD

0i o

\.

~./ BSA-aniline

64 D 41 -o~:~.~

_] BSA-aniline 10

100

i

i

\----o

1,000

10,000

i

I00,000

ANTI BODY (1/dilution) Fig~e

I

Solid phase radioimmunoassay of rabbit antiserum (Panel A) or ascites fluids containing MoAbs:

Panel B: 391-IB; Panel C:

398-17C; and Panel D: 391-9B.

Each antibody was tested on BSA-TCDD and BSA-aniline.

2010

MoAbs showed >200-fold preferential binding to BSA-TCDD over BSA-aniline whereas rabbit antisera was much less discriminatory.

MoAb 391-IB was purified from ascites fluid,

radiodinated and tested for direct binding to BSA-TCDD and BSA-aniline.

125[-MoAb-391-1B]

demonstrated relatively high binding affinity to BSA-TCDD (Ka = 4.5 x 10-8 i/mol) (Figure 2) and should detect approximately

I ng 2,3,7,8-TCDD per ml of extract.

The specificity and

sensitivity of this MoAb is currently being investigated.

8o- A

v

C~ Z

D 60o 03 .Q

BSA-TCDD

<~ o 40-

/

m

, 20re?

~-----~-- ~ ' - ~

I--t

(',1

~o/./°

~:.-.-- o - -

,

l

1

10

~

,~

125I 591-1B MoAb ADDED Figure 2.

~

~ BSA-aniline I

I

100

1000

(ng)

Direct binding of 1251-1abelled MoAb 391-IB on BSA-TCDD or BSA-aniline. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The financial

assistance of the United States Environmental

Protection

Agency is

gratefully appreciated.

REFERENCES I.

P.W. Albro, M.I. Luster, K. Chae, S.K. Chaudhary, G. Clark, L.D. Lawson, J.T. Corbett and J.D. McKinney, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 50, 137 (1979).

2.

M. Cianfriglia, D. Armellini, A. Massone and M. Mariani, Hybridoma, 2(4), 451 (1983).

3.

S. Fazekas de St. Groth and M.L. Souan, Science 229, 77(1985).

4.

G. Kohler and C. Milstein, Nature 256, 495 (1975).

5.

G. Kohler and C. Milstein, Eur. J. Immunol. 6, 511 (1976).

6.

S.J. Kennel, L.J. Foote and P.K. Lankford, Cancer Res. 41, 3465 (1981).

7.

S.J. Kennel, J. Immunol. Meth. 55, I (1982).

8.

S.J. Kennel, T. Lankford and K.M. Flynn, Cancer Res 43, 2843 (1983).