mycological research 112 (2008) 1241–1244
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mycres
Morphological and genetic characteristics of the entomopathogenic fungus Ophiocordyceps nutans and its host insects Fumito SASAKIa, Toshizumi MIYAMOTOa,*, Aki YAMAMOTOb, Yutaka TAMAIa, Takashi YAJIMAa a
Laboratory of Forest Resource Biology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, N9-W9, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan Otaru Museum, 1-3-6 Temiya, Otaru 047-0041, Japan
b
article info
abstract
Article history:
We examined the morphology, genetic variation, and insect host species of the fungus
Received 11 April 2007
Ophiocordyceps nutans. Fifty-two fruit bodies collected in Hokkaido, Japan, were grouped
Received in revised form
by host species, and 19 samples were analysed. The ranges of the lengths and breadths
19 March 2008
of all fruit body parts were similar among host groups. In the genetic analysis, the 5.8S
Accepted 1 April 2008
rDNA region showed completely identical sequences, although differences of up to six
Corresponding Editor:
nucleotides were recognized in the ITS regions. The distance values between our samples
Richard A. Humber
using the Kimura two-parameter model were lower than 0.007. Thus, the O. nutans examined here were concluded to form a closely related group with little detectable variability
Keywords: Biological control
that parasitized nine hemipteran species. ª 2008 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Entomophagous Host specificity Intraspecific variation Vegetable wasps and plant worms
Introduction Cordyceps species (in the broad sense) are entomopathogenic fungi belonging to the order Hypocreales (Ascomycota). They infect insect larvae or imagoes, kill them, and form fruit bodies on the corpses (Ito & Hirano 1997). Some Cordyceps species are used as herbal medicines (Shimizu 1994; Kinjo & Zang 2001). Because members of the Cordyceps spp. usually have host specificity, their anamorphs are likely useful as selective biological pest control agents (Ito & Hirano 1997; Sato et al. 1997; Evans et al. 1999; Nikoh & Fukatsu 2000).
Ophiocordyceps nutans, which specifically parasitizes stinkbugs (Hemiptera) (Hywel-Jones 1995; Fukatsu 1999), occurs in Japan, Taiwan, China, and New Guinea, as well as other locations (Shimizu 1994). This species is among the most common of all Cordyceps species in Korea (Sung 1996). In China, it is thought to have medicinal value (Mao 1998; Liu & Xu 2000). Stinkbugs cause considerable damage to agriculture and forestry, and the anamorph of O. nutans, Hymenostilbe nutans, is a potential selective biocontrol agent in these cases. Cordyceps species, O. nutans included, are mainly classified morphologically by their colour, fruit body shape, and host insect species (Shimizu 1994; Ito & Hirano 1996). Three known
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ81 11 706 2536. E-mail address:
[email protected] 0953-7562/$ – see front matter ª 2008 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2008.04.008
1242
F. Sasaki et al.
species and unidentified insect species in five families of Hemiptera serve as hosts of O. nutans (Moureau 1949; Samson & Evans 1975; Sung et al. 1993). Few investigations have examined the fungal host species among hemipterans; without this knowledge, however, the development and application of biological controls cannot proceed. Moreover, the variation of O. nutans among different hosts has not been examined, although morphological and/or genetic variation related to host species has been reported in other entomopathogenic fungi (Fegan et al. 1993; Jensen et al. 2001; Wada et al. 2003). Therefore, we examined the host insect species for O. nutans, as well as the morphological and genetic characteristics of the fungus.
Materials and methods From July to September 2002, we collected fruit bodies of Ophiocordyceps nutans in the Tomakomai Experimental Forest, Hokkaido University, Japan (42 390 3300 –42 430 0600 N, 141 320 4500 – 141 380 3600 E; 2.7 ha), and identified the host insect species (Tomokuni et al. 1993). Fruit bodies were grouped by host species, and three fruit bodies from each group were examined. For groups that had fewer than three fruit bodies, we used one or two. The strains used are listed in Table 1. Isolation was conducted according to the surface sterilization methods of Sasaki et al. (2004). The following isolates were obtained: T23, T24, T30, T35, T39, T41, and T71. These isolates were incubated using Sabouraud–glucose agar medium (pH 8) at 20 C about 3 months in the dark according to Sasaki et al. (2005). All samples we examined were deposited in the Laboratory of Forest Resource Biology, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan.
Morphological observation Fruit bodies were oven-dried for 60–72 h at 60 C. Perithecial heads were rehydrated in 0.05 % Triton X-100 solution (Hywel-Jones 1995) and observed using differential interference microscopy. The lengths and breadths of 20 perithecia, 20 asci, and 30 partspores were measured for each fruit body. The measurements of the fruit bodies, each with a maximum of three replicates, were compared among host insect species groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; SPSS 10.0 J for Windows, SPSS, Chicago, IL).
Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis Isolates or specimens of each sample were used for DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was dissolved in 50 ml TE buffer; 1 ml of the DNA solution was used as template DNA. The primer pair ITS1f (Gardes & Bruns 1993) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990) was used for amplification. The samples were run using an initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 C; followed by 25 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94 C, annealing for 1 min at 55 C, and extension for 3 min at 72 C; and a final extension for 7 min at 72 C. The abovementioned primers were used for the cycle sequencing reaction. After the samples were purified, we used an ABI Auto Sequencer 3730 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) to determine the ITS1–5.8S rDNA–ITS2 regions of the rDNA sequences. The sequences obtained were aligned and compared using CLUSTALW (Thompson et al. 1994). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA version 3.1 (Kumar et al. 2004), using Kimura two-parameter models (Kimura 1980).
Results Fifty-two fruit bodies were collected, and their host hemipterans were classified into three families, five genera, and nine species (Table 1). More than three O. nutans fruit bodies were found on each of the other hemipteran species. Accordingly, 19 samples were used for morphological observations and DNA analysis. The samples are listed in Table 1. The ranges of the lengths and breadths of all fruit body parts were similar among the host groups (Table 1). No significant differences were observed in the morphologies of the fruit body components among the host insect species (ANOVA, P > 0.05). The 19 samples had high similarity in ITS1–5.8S rDNA–ITS2 sequences. There was no genetic variation in this sequence region related to the host species, although differences of up to six nucleotides were recognized. In particular, in the 5.8S rDNA region, all samples had completely identical sequences. The distance values between the strains were lower than 0.007. All samples were registered in the DNA Databank of Japan (DDBJ) under accession numbers AB176462, AB176463, and AB366618–AB366634.
Table 1 – Host species and the parts in fruit in bodies of o. nutans Host families Acanthosomatidae
Pentatomidae
Urostylidae
Host species Acanthosoma denticaudum Acanthosoma forficula Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale angulatum Acanthosoma labiduroides Elasmucha putoni Lelia decempunctata Pentatoma japonica Pentatoma rufipes Urostylis annulicornis
Strains T21, T38, T32, T41, T70 T33, T39, T62 T23, T35, T42 T24, T30, T37
T46 T43 T71 T82 T63
Perithecia (mm)
Asci (mm)
610–1170200–500 720–1070240–490 780–1030200–380 700–1080210–400 610–880190–370 660–1140290–560 890–1150260–370 550–1110200–400 720–1170220–360
295–7555–9 305–7756–9 355–8306–8 200–8755–9 305–6555–9 225–7155–9 375–7705–8 270–8055–9 275–7405–9
There was no significant difference in each host which has three replicates (ANOVA, p > 0.05).
Partspores (mm) 4–121.5–2.5 4–14.51.5–2 8–14.51.5–2 3.5–12.51–2.5 4–101.5– 2 4–14.51.5–2 4–12.51–1.5 6.5–201.5–2 7–111– 2
Morphological and genetic characteristics of the entomopathogenic fungus
Table 2 – Fruit body sizes of Ophiocordyceps nutans Strains
Perithecial head
Fruit body
length (mm)
breadth (mm)
length (mm)
9.1 12.7 6 7.2 11 10.6 12.8 5.4 8.5 9.8 11.1 13 10.1 10 2.5 11.5 8.4 14 13.3
2.4 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.6 3.7 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.6 2.4 2.5 1.5 3 2.9 2.9 3.4
78 104 100 87 88 32 82 112 63 100 81 83 83 65 82 104 93 98 78
T21 T23 T24 T30 T32 T33 T35 T37 T38 T39 T41 T42 T43 T46 T62 T63 T70 T71 T82
Discussion Previously reported hosts of Ophiocordyceps nutans include Pentatomidae, the Plataspidae Coptosoma sp. and Reduviidae (Mouerau 1949); Pyrrhocoridae (Samson & Evans 1975); and the Coreidae Molipteryx fuliginosa, the Pentatomidae Lelia decempunctata, and Palomena angulosa (Sung et al. 1993). Our results corroborated earlier findings (Moureau 1949; Samson & Evans 1975; Sung et al. 1993) indicating that Pentatomidae is the only common host family, within which we found one common species, L. decempunctata (Sung et al. 1993). Because the former studies examined O. nutans from Africa, which is very far from Japan, the host species may differ. Previous research has reported genetic variation related to host species in some entomopathogenic fungi. For example, Jensen et al. (2001) and Wada et al. (2003) showed variation in the ITS1–5.8S rDNA–ITS2 regions of Entomophthora muscae (a fly pathogen) and Beauveria brongniartii (a beetle pathogen), respectively, using PCR-RFLP analysis. B. brongniartii shows variation related to its host species in the 5.8S rDNA region, which is a very short, stable region (Wada et al. 2003). In contrast, our O. nutans samples had completely identical 5.8S rDNA sequences, and there was no variation in the ITS1– 5.8S rDNA–ITS2 sequences related to the use of different host species. In fungi, the distance values of ITS1–5.8S rDNA–ITS2 sequences from one species are generally between 0.000 and 0.050 (Chen et al. 2001, 2004). The distance values between our O. nutans samples were lower than 0.007. In morphological comparisons, we observed no significant differences in perithecia, asci, and partspores among O. nutans using different host insect species, although the sizes of the fruit bodies varied (Table 2). We did not consider geographical variation because we sampled within the same area. Accordingly, from both
1243
morphological and molecular biological results, the O. nutans strains analysed here were concluded to form a closely related group with little detectable variability that parasitized nine hemipteran species. Previous studies of O. nutans did not identify host insect species or comprehensively investigate the morphological and genetic characteristics and host species. Thus, this is the first study to investigate these in O. nutans.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by Research Fellowships for Young Scientists (No. 17$9011) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
references
Chen YQ, Hu B, Xu F, Zhang W, Zhou H, Qu LH, 2004. Genetic variation of Cordyceps sinensis, a fruit-body-producing entomopathogenic species from different geographical regions in China. FEMS Microbiology Letters 230: 153–158. Chen YQ, Wang N, Qu LK, Li TH, Zhang WM, 2001. Determination of anamorph of Cordyceps sinensis inferred from the analysis of the ribosomal transcribed spacers and 5.8S rDNA. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 29: 597–607. Evans HC, Smith SM, Katundu JM, Kapama JT, 1999. A Cordyceps pathogen of sugar-cane white grubs in Tanzania. Mycologist 13: 11–14. Fegan N, Manners JM, Maclean DJ, Irwin JAG, Samuels KDZ, Holdom DG, Li DP, 1993. Random amplified polymorphic DNA markers reveal a high degree of genetic diversity in the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. Journal of General Microbiology 139: 2075–2081. Fukatsu T, 1999. Entomoparasitic fungi related to Cordyceps and endosymbiotic fungi of insects: insights into the origin and evolution of endosymbiosis [in Japanese]. Transactions of the Japan Mycological Society 40: 34–41. Gardes M, Bruns TD, 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118. Hywel-Jones N, 1995. Notes on Cordyceps nutans and its anamorph, a pathogen of hemipteran bugs in Thailand. Mycological Research 99: 724–726. Ito Y, Hirano T, 1996. First successful amplification of 18S ribosomal DNA of Cordyceps spp. by the PCR method. Mycoscience 24: 109–110. Ito Y, Hirano T, 1997. The determination of the partial 18S ribosomal DNA sequences of Cordyceps species. Letters in Applied Microbiology 25: 239–242. Jensen AB, Thomsen L, Eilenberg J, 2001. Intraspecific variation and host specificity of Entomophthora muscae sensu stricto isolates revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA, universal primed PCR, PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, and conidial morphology. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78: 251–259. Kimura M, 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary late of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequence. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120. Kinjo N, Zang M, 2001. Morphological and phylogenetic studies on Cordyceps sinensis distributed in southwestern China. Mycoscience 42: 567–574.
1244
Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M, 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5: 150–163. Liu J, Xu YC, 2000. Resources of wild macrofungi from Yuhang City [in Chinese with English summary]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College 17: 179–184. Mao XL, 1998. Economic Fungi in China [in Chinese]. Science Press, Beijing. Moureau J, 1949. Cordyceps du Congo Belge. Memoirs Institute Royal Colonial Belge 7: 1–58. Nikoh N, Fukatsu T, 2000. Interkingdom host-jumping underground: phylogenetic analysis of entomoparasitic fungi of the genus Cordyceps. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 629–638. Samson RA, Evans HC, 1975. Notes on entomogenous fungi from Ghana. 3. The genus Hymenostilbe. Proceedings, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akadamie van Wetenschappen (series C) 78: 73–80. Sasaki F, Miyamoto T, Tamai Y, Yajima T, 2004. Isolation of vegetable wasps and plant worms, Cordyceps nutans, from fruit-body tissue. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 85: 70–73. Sasaki F, Miyamoto T, Tamai Y, Yajima T, 2005. Optimum temperature and pH for mycelial growth of Cordyceps nutans Pat. (ascomycetes). International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms 7: 301–304. Sato H, Kamata N, Shimazu M, 1997. Aerial infection of Cordyceps militaris Link (Clavicipitales: Clavicipitaceae) against larvae of
F. Sasaki et al.
Quadricalcarifella punctatella (Motschulsky) (Lepidoptera: Notodondidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 32: 249–252. Shimizu D, 1994. Colour Iconography of Vegetable Wasps and Plant Worms [in Japanese]. Seibundo Shinkosha, Tokyo. Sung JM, 1996. The Insect-borne Fungus of Korea in Colour [in Korean]. Kyo-Hak Publishers, Seoul, Korea. Sung JM, Kim CH, Yang KJ, Lee HK, Kim YS, 1993. Studies on the distribution and utilization of Cordyceps militaris and C. nutans. Korean Journal of Mycology 21: 94–105. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ, 1994. CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680. Tomokuni M, Yasuna T, Takai M, Yamashita I, Kawamura M, Kawasawa T (eds), 1993. A Field Guide to Japanese Bugs. [In Japanese.] Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo. Wada S, Horita M, Hirayae K, Shimazu M, 2003. Discrimination of Japanese isolates of Beauveria brongniartii (Deuteromycota: Hyphomycetes) by RFLP of the rDNA–ITS regions. Applied Entomology and Zoology 38: 551–557. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J, 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds), PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 315–322.