Morphology Changes of Supported Rh Particles During Thermal Treatments as Probed by Catalytic Measurements

Morphology Changes of Supported Rh Particles During Thermal Treatments as Probed by Catalytic Measurements

C.H. Bartholomew and J.B. Butt (Editors), Catalyst Deactiuation 1991 0 1991 Elsevier Science PublishersB.V., Amsterdam 613 MORPHOLOGY CHANGES OF SUP...

578KB Sizes 0 Downloads 13 Views

C.H. Bartholomew and J.B. Butt (Editors), Catalyst Deactiuation 1991 0 1991 Elsevier Science PublishersB.V., Amsterdam

613

MORPHOLOGY CHANGES OF SUPPORTED Rh PARTICLES DURING THERMAL TREATMENTS AS PROBED BY CATALYTIC MEASUREMENTS 1

1

1

2

W. E. ALVAREZ2, R. J. FENOGLIO , G. M. NUfiEZ , A. J. ROUCO and D. E. RESASCO ’INTEMA, Institute of Materials Science and Technology, University of Mar del Plata, Juan B.Justo 4302, Mar del Plata (Argentina) 2Monomeros Vinilicos, Polo Petroquimico, Bahia Blanca (Argentina)

SUMMARY The effects of oxidation - reduction cycles on the activity and selectivity of supported Rh catalysts were investigated using the hydrogenolysis of methylcyclopentane (MCP) as a test reaction. From the analysis of catalytic properties and reduction profiles it is concluded that, on silica-supported catalysts, following the initial oxidation at 400 C, successive reduction treatments at increasing temperatures cause a progressive reconstruction of the Rh particles. On g-alumina-supported catalysts the situation is more complex. The inter-actionof Rh with the support during the initial oxidation makes a fraction of the Rh inaccessible to the gas phase. Only after subsequent oxidation - reduction cycles do they behave like the silica-supported catalysts INTRODUCTION

In the past few years the study of morphology changes undergone by

supported Rh particles during oxidation / reduction thermal treatments has

attracted considerable attention (refs 1-4). These phenomena are of

particular importance in the deactivation of automotive exhaust catalysts for which rhodium is the main active ingredient for the reduction of NO. In the present work, we investigate the effects of such morphology

changes on catalytic properties by using the hydrogenolysis of MCP as a

test reaction. Because of its high sensitivity to surface structure (ref.

51, this reaction results particularly useful for probing changes in the

morphology of the metal particles. It is well know that on smooth surfaces with a large fraction of highly coordinated etoms, the MCP ring opening mainly yields 2MF (2-methylpentane) and 3MP (3-methylpentane).

On

the other hand, on irregular surfaces with a high number of uncoordinated atoms, the percentage of n-hexane increases and the

product distribution tends to the statistical (2MP:3MP:nHex:40:20:40) (refs. 6-7).

614 EXPERIMENTAL The catalyst samples were prepared by supports:

-

impregnating the two

Degussa C y-A1203, 100 m2/g and Aerosil 380 SiOz, 380 m2/g

-

with a rhodium chloride (RhC13.3H20) solution to produce a Rh concentration of 2 wt% in the catalysts. The catalysts were characterized by temperature

programmed reduction (TPR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and

catalytic activity measurements. The TPR apparatus used in this work has

been described elsewhere (ref. 8). For each TPR run, the sample (40 mg) was previously oxidized in a 5% 0 /He mixture at either 200 or 400’C for 30 2

min, following a linear increasing temperature at 7’C/min. Then, the TPR was started from O’C using the same heating rate of 7’C/min

3

in 30 cm /min

flow of 5% H /Ar mixture. The activity measurements for the hydrogenolysis 2 of MCP were conducted in a pulse reactor. The previously oxidized samples

were reduced in situ at various temperatures in pure H2. For each run, a gaseous 400 pl pulse of 6.8% MCP in hydrogen was injected into the 22

czn"/min H stream, which acted as a carrier. The products were directly 2

sent to a gas chromatograph and separated by a column packed with 30%

DC200/500 on Chromosorb P

A/W 60-80.

JEOL TEM 100 CX.

The electron microscope used was a

RESULTS

Thermal Programmed Reduction (TPR)

Reduction profiles obtained on the Rh/Si02 catalyst after different

pretreatments are shown in Fig. la. When the fresh sample was pre-oxidized at 400’C, the TPR profile (denoted as 1-ox-400 in the figure) presented a main H2 consumption peak at about 82’C and much smaller peaks at 30-5O’C.

It was observed that after the first TPR, the subsequent oxidation -

reduction cycles showed a reproducible behaviour. In every case, the size

of the reduction peak decreased as the pre-oxidation temperature was lowered to 2OO’C and increased again as it was increased to 400’C.

It can be noted that most of the Rh was reduced below 150’C for all the samples investigated. When the sample was left at room temperature in air for

several days, the following TPR showed a small H consumption at low 2 reduction temperatures (about 5OOC). The sequence of TPR profiles for the RNAl 0 catalyst after different 23 pretreatments are shown in Fig. lb. A clear difference is observed in the first oxidation (400’C) - reduction cycle (denoted as 1-ox-400). relative to the subsequent cycles. In the first cycle, the H consumption was 2

significantly lower and extended to higher reduction temperatures.

615

Rh

I

' -> ,

0

\

50

A :

'L5-OX-200

100

150

/

alumina

6-OX-400

'\

/'

7-OX-200

4-OX-25

200

250

300

360

400

0

50

100

150

200

250

TEMPERATURE

TEMPERATURE (C)

300

360

400

300

350

400

(C)

3-OX-400 2-OX-200

,/ 0

50

100

150

200

250

TEMPERATURE

300

(C)

350

-400

/

1-OX-400 400

0

50

100

150

200

250

TEMPERATIJRE (C)

Fig.1. TPR profiles of succesive oxidation - reduction cycles on Rh catalysts. For each TPR the order in the sequence and the oxidation temperatures are indicated. (a) left panel: silica-supported catalysts; (b) right panel: alumina-supported catalysts. Under the assumption that the initial oxidation at 400’C was responsible

for the low H consumption on the alumina - supported catalyst, we carried 2

out two additional thermal programmed reductions, drastically varying the

initial oxidation conditions. In one case, the fresh sample was heated in

the 0 /He mixture at a very low rate, l’C/min, up to 400’C and left for 1 h 2

at that temperature (sample 1-ox-400(L)). In the second case, the fresh sample was suddenly transferred, in the same 0 /He mixture, from room 2

616

temperature to 400-C and left at that temperature for 1 h (sample l-ox-4OO(S)).

The TPR profiles following these two pre-treatments are

compared in Fig. 2. A clear difference is observed. The sample oxidized at

a lower rate exhibits a lower H2 consumption, indicating that, indeed, the initial oxidation plays an important role in the loss of accessibility of

Rh f o r the subsequent reduction. However, as also shown in Fig. 2, the

difference observed in the f i r s t cycle disappears when subsequent cycles are compared. The H2 consumption and position of the peaks

are very similar when the two used samples are subsequently o x i d i z e d under the same standard conditions (heating rate, 7OC/min).

2-OX-400 (L)

Fig. 2. Reduction profiles of Rh / alumina catalysts after different oxidation pretreatments. (L)low heating rate: CS! heated capidly from 25 C to 400 C. Below: first cycles; Above: second cycles

2-OX-400 ( S )

0

50

100

160

200

250

TEMPERATURE

300

(C)

350

400

Electron microscopy (TEM)

The catalysts were examined after an initial oxidation at 4OO0C followed

by reduction at two different temperatures (150’C and 500’C).

Both samples,

Rh/Si02 and Rh/A1203, when reduced at 15O’C, exhibited very small crystallites, i.e. smaller than 10 A.

The sample reduced at 500-C suffered

a moderate sintering, exhibiting particles in the range 10-20 A.

Hydrogenolysis of MCP

We have studied the variation of overall MCP conversion after an initial

oxidation at 400’C followed by reduction at subsequently higher

temperatures. The results for the Rh/Si02 catalyst are plotted in Fig. 3a.

On this catalyst, the overall conversion initially decreases with

increasing reduction temperature, then it starts increasing, reaching a

617 maximum after a reduction temperature of about 35O0C and then markedly

decreases.

It can be noted that the same pattern is reproduced after

several oxidation - reduction cycles. The maximum conversion in each cycle

was found to increase after each consecutive cycle.

On the other hand, the variation of overall conversion with reduction

temperature for the alumina-supported catalyst is illustrated in Fig. 3b.

The observed trend is significantly different from that reported above or

the silica-supported catalyst. Over the entire initial cycle, the activity

is relatively low and changes little with temperature of reduction. But, after the second cycle, it is found to vary in the same way as Rh/SiOg,

exhibiting a maximum after reduction at 350'C. CONVERSION (%)/mQ Rh I

150

250

350

I

450

REDUCTION TEMPERATLIRE (C)

CONVERSION (%)/mQ Fin I

150

250

350

450

REDUCTION TEMPERATilRE (C)

Fig. 3. Variation of conversion as a functi9n of reduction temperature after an initial oxidation treatment at 400 C. First ( a1; third ( A 1 and fifth cycle ( 0 ) . (a) left: RWsilica catalyst; (b) right: RWalumina catalyst. In parallel to the changes in overall conversion, significant

changes in product distribution are observed for the two catalysts

during the oxidation - reduction cycles. Fig. 4a shows the variation of the percentage of n-hexane in products over different cycles for the case of Rh/Si02. Except for a slight increase at low reduction

temperatures observed for the first cycle, the percentage of n-hexane decreases with temperature of reduction over the whole range. In the case of Rh/A1203, the variation of product distribution

with temperature of reduction shows a contrasting trend for the first cycle compared to the subsequent cycles. A s depicted in Fig. 4b,

during the first cycle the percentage of n-hexane increases with

reduction temperature over the entire cycle. By contrast, it exhibits

a maximum at intermediate temperatures during the third cycle.

,

618

35;

20

n-Hexane in products

% n-Hexane in products

35,

i 15t

10’ 150

1

250

350

10 150

450

260

350

450

REDUCTION TEMPERATURE (C)

REDUCTION TEMPERATURE (C)

Fig. 4. Variation of percentage of n-hexane in products as a funcLion of reduction temperature after an initial oxidation treatment at 400 C. First ( 0 ) ;third ( A ) and fifth cycle ( 0 ) . (a) left: Wsilica catalyst; (b1 right: RWaluminacatalyst. DISCUSSION

Wong and McCabe ( r e f s . 3-4) have studied the oxidation reduction cycles of Rh/Si02 and Rh/A1203 catalysts in great detail.

Their studies mainly focused on oxidation temperatures significantly

higher than those used in this work.

Their main conclusions were

that on silica the only effect of the oxidation

-

reduction cycles is

Rh crystallite sintering. On alumina the situation is more complex.

An initial oxidation treatment at

8OOOC

causes the diffusion of some

Rh into the bulk of the support. This Rh, buried into the alumina,

can be restored back to the surface by a high temperature reduction.

After this reduction treatment no diffusion into the alumina is

observed during a subsequent oxidation treatment at 500 C. In accord with these authors, we propose that on Si02, the observed

changes in catalytic activity and selectivity can be interpreted in terms

of changes in the Rh crystallite morphology. As described in a previous

paper (ref. 91, we postulate that following oxidation at 400’C,

the

subsequent reduction at low temperatures leaves the metal particle with a

very open structure. An increase in the reduction temperature causes an

annealing of the metal particle. During this process, the surface of the

particle undergoes profound changes, i.e. conversion of open planes into

closely packed planes. These changes may significantly affect the catalytic

properties (ref. 101, causing the observed variations in activity and

619

selectivity.

Indeed, as shown in Fig. 3, the overall activity significantly changes

as the reduction temperature is increased. It is generally accepted that

hydrogenolysis reactions require a relatively large ensemble of atoms to constitute the active site. The maximum in activity after reduction at 350’C

would indicate that, at that temperature, an optimal configuration of

the surface atoms is reached. Also, as illustrated in Fig. 4, as the

surface of the metal particle becomes more closely packed, the percentage

of n-hexane in products decreases, which would be consistent with an increase in the coordination numbei of the Hh atoms.

It is interesting to compare activity and selectivity data obtained on a

3% R W S i O

catalyst whose particle size was in the range 40-50 A (ref. 91,

2

with the trends reported in this work for a highly dispersed 2% RWSiO2 (about 10

A).

In the previous work, it was observed that the activity

maximum was obtained after reduction at about 250’C while the maximum

activity was found to decrease after each cycle. Here, the maximum appears after reduct,ionat 350 C and it increases a.fter each succesive oxidation-

reduction cycle. These opposing trends indicate that the effects of the proposed reconstruction on the surface morphclogy strongly depends on the

original size of the metal crystallite. After all, it is reasonable to expect that smaller particles, when oxidized at

4OO0C, be

spread

more readily over the support than large particles (ref. 11, and

consequently, a higher temperature would be required to reach the high

activity configuration.

The patterns of the selectivity towards n-hexane are also different.

Whi1.e. j n the case of relatively large particles the percentage of n-hexane

is very low and changes little during oxidation/reduction cycles, here it drastically changes over Lhe cycle as a consequence of the surface

smoothing process. Again, this effect would be

particles.

more marked on the smaller

In the case of Rh/A1203, our results make evident a strong influence of

the support during the oxidation - reduction cycles. Both, the relatively

low activity (Fig. 3b) and H

2

consumption (Fig. la and 2 ) observed during

the first cycle suggest that after the initial oxidation at 400'C an

important fraction of Rh is not accessible to the gas phase, and it is only

restored af+.er reduction at. high temperatures. A possible explanation for this phenomenon could be the diffusion of Rh into the alumina support described above. However, according to Wong and McCabe (ref. 4). this

process would require significantly higher temperatures than those used in this work.

620

The fact that the low accessibility of Rh is only evident during the

first cycle (fresh sample) would indicate that the interaction responsible f o r this phenomenon might rather be between the support and rhodium precursor. A second possibility, perhaps related to this, might be that a fraction of Rh may become partially covered by support species

during the initial stages of the preparation, i.e. during the impregnation

with the acidic solution due to dissolution and re-deposition of the alumina (refs. 11-12). If that were the case, those species would be removed from the metal surface by a high temperature oxidation cycle.

-

reduction

After the second cycle the effect of the support is less pronounced and

both, activity and selectivity follow about the same pattern as the RWSiO 2 catalyst. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge Fundacih Antorchas and CONICET of Argentina for

financial support of this work. REFERENCES 1 2

C. Lee and L. D. Schmidt, J. Catal. 101 (1986) 123. E. J. Braunschweig, A. D. Logan, A. K. Datye and D. J. Smith, J. Catal.

3

C. Wong and R. McCabe, J. Catal. 107 (1987) 535. C. Wong and R. McCabe, J.Cata1. 119 (1989) 47. M. Che and C. 0. Bennett, in D.D. Eley et al. (Eds.1, Advances Catalysis, Academic Press, San Diego, 1989, Vol. 36, p. 68. F. Gault, in D.D. Eley et al. (Eds.1, Advances in Catalysis, Acade Press, New York, 1983, Vol 30, p. 1. J. G. van Senden, E. H. van Broekhoven, C. T. J. Wreesman, V. Ponec, J. Catal. 87 (19851 468. D. E. Damiani, E. D. Perez Millman and A. J. Rouco, J. Catal. 101

4 5 6 7 8

118 (1989) 227.

(1956) 162.

9

10

R. J. Fenoglio, G. M. Nufiez and D. E. Resasco, J. Catal. 121 (1990) 7 G.M. Nuiiez, A.R. Patrignani and A . J . Rouco, J. Catal. 101 (1986)

11

E. Santacesaria, S. Carra and I. Adami, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. De

12

A. A. Castro, 0. A. Scelza, E. R. Benvenuto, F. T. Baronetti, S.R. Miguel and J. M. Parera, in Poncelet et al. (eds.1, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983, Vol. 16, p.47.

162.

16 (19771 41.