MPN estimates of VAM diaspores in cultivated soils

MPN estimates of VAM diaspores in cultivated soils

199 Agriculture, Ecosystems and E n v i r o n m e n t , 29 (1989) E l s e v i e r S c i e n c e P u b l i s h e r s B . V . , Amsterdam Printed i n C...

139KB Sizes 2 Downloads 43 Views

199

Agriculture, Ecosystems and E n v i r o n m e n t , 29 (1989) E l s e v i e r S c i e n c e P u b l i s h e r s B . V . , Amsterdam Printed i n Czechoslovakia

MPN e s t i m a t e s

I.

o£ VAM d i a s p o r e s in c u l t i v a t e d

Jekobsen and T. Heidmann, A g r i c u l t u r a l

Rise N a t i o n a l

Laboratory,

199-203

soils

Research O e p a r t m e n t ,

0K-4000 R o s k i l d e and Research C e n t r e

Foulum, DK-8833 Orum S e n d e r l y n g ,

Denmark

ABSTRACT Most NPN e s t i m a t e s locations

samples from t h r e e

were i n t h e r a n g e 20-450 d i a s p o r e s

considerable limited

o f VAM d i a s p o r e s i n s o i l

variation

extent

within

be e x p l a i n e d

each l o c a t i o n by o t h e r s o i l

(100 9 s o i l ) "1

A

could only to a p a r a m e t e r s and

cropping history. INTRODUCTION The r a t e

of establishment

is influenced in the soil. bility

o f VA m y c o r r h i z a

by t h e number o f i n f e c t i v e More i n f o r m a t i o n

(VAH) i n a n n u a l crops

propagules

(diasporas)

i s needed on t h e v a r i a t i o n

o f d i a s p o r a numbers. The o b j e c t i v e

o f t h e p r e s e n t work was

t o d e t e r m i n e numbers n f VAN d i a s p o r a s a t w e l l - d e f i n e d points

in three

ent farming

fields,

sampling

where l o n g - t e r m e x p e r i m e n t s w i t h

systems have r e c e n t l y

and s t a -

differ-

been i n i t i a t e d .

MATERZALS ANO METHODS Ten s o i l

samples were c o l l e c t e d

locations

(Table 1).

i n t h e autumn from each o f t h r e e

O n l y b a r l e y o r wheat had been grown a t Odum

during the previous three

years,

while different

had been p l a c e d a t Jyndevad end Foulum u n t i l fore

sampling,

subsamples

when b a r l e y

crop r o t a t i o n s

the last

spring

was sown. Each sample c o n s i s t e d

be-

o f 12

($ 55 mm, 0 - 2 0 cm depth) t a k e n from an area o f 28 m2

200

around a defined p o i n t . with irradiated

S o i l was sieved (< 4 mm) and d i l u t e d

(10 kGy) s o i l

of the same sample. O i l u t i o n s were

eithe~ 2 - f o l d w i t h seven r e p l i c a t e

p l a n t s at each of s i x steps

(J) or l O - f o l d w i t h ten r e p l i c a t e s st each. of f i v e E). Cucumber p l s n t s were grown i n 60 g s o i l

lots

steps (F and

i n t r a y s placed

i n the greenhouse f o r 26 (J) or 28 (F and ~ ) . d a y s .

NPN e s t i m a t e s

were obtained from the number of i n f e c t e d p l a n t s as described by F i s h e r and Ystee (1963). Levels of YAH i n f e c t i o n i n p l a n t s from u n d i l u t e d s o i l

after

were recorded

11 end 26 d , y s

(J) or 28

days (F and E). Results were compared w i t h • wide range of p h y s i o - c h e m i c e l and b i o l o g i c s 1 parameters also measured at the 30 sampling p o i n t s .

Tab. 1. Some c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s

Location

F i e l d area

of the t h r e e sampling s i t e s

Soil type

(he)

pH

01sen P

(10"2M CeCl2)

(mg kg "1)

Jyndevsd (J)

18

coarse sand

5.2-6.2

37-55

Foulum (F)

25

loamy send

5.4-5.9

33-42

Bdum (B)

16

sandy loam

6.1-6.6

22-38

RESULTS The number of VAH diasporas v a r i e d c o n s i d e r a b l y between samples w i t h i n each l o c a t i o n

and i n s p i t e of the wide confidence i n t e r -

v a l of the s i n g l e estimates s i g n i f i c a n t ell

locations

(Fig.

cropping h i s t o r y

differences

appeared s t

1). Oisspore numbers c o r r e l a t e d

poorly with

end s o i l

v ~ r i e b l e e except at Jyndevsd where

201

significant ~0.76)

correlations

were o b s e r v e d .

from u n d i l u t e d tions

(Fig.

2).

ni£ican¢ly

late

In£ection

levels

plants

more c l o s e l y

not c l o s e l y

within

correlated

from u n s t e r i l e

with

than b~tween l o c a -

(r = 0.74,

Znfection

levels

Jyndevad s o i l

0.73,

and

measured

d i d nor c o r r e -

d i s s p o r e numbers.

JYNDEVAD 400

i n cucumber r o o t s

end d i a s p o r e numbers were s i g -

F, and ~, r e s p e c t i v e l y ) ;

22-day-old

and Olsen P ( r =

Levels of VAN i n f e c t i o n

were l e s s v a r i a b l e

although

0.78 £or J, in

soil

w i t h pH ( r = 0.74)

ODUM

1200

= 18o I

I

C,V =

11 ~.

T

1000

"~ 200

v)

BOO "0 0

o

0 0 q.,

0

~. f/J

600

FOULUM

P 400

o

=

0 n_

205

0

GV = 44

400

0

:E ~00 200

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

910

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0

Somple No.

Somple No, 95~, confidence Intervols:

Fig.

JYNt)EVAD

0.59 MPN -

FOU~UM ~ ) ~DUM

0.4.3 MPN - 2.32 MPN

2. Number of VAH d i a s p o r e s

and Foulum.

1.69 MPN

i n samples from Jyndevad,

Odum,

202

40 JYNDEVAD X ' = 20 CV = 32 20

Hlii

0

m

rOU

_

40

}



o

~ 2o

-

I

c

X

0

-

'

ODUM

20

X=12 CV = 47

0 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 6 3 1 0

1

Sample No.

Fig.

2. Levels of VAM i n f e c t i o n

in 26-

(J) or 28- (F and 0) day

old cucumber plants grown in undiluted soil.

Z03

DISCUSSION Numbers o f VAN d i a s p o r a s i n t h e p r e s e n t work are i n t h e same r a n g e as found i n c u l t i v a t e d 1983).

soils

A l t h o u g h some v a r i a t i o n

i n U.K.

(Sanders and Sheikh

s t Jyndevad c o u l d be e x p l a i n e d by

s o ~ l P and pH t h e background f o r t h e o b s e r v e d v a r i a t i o n s largely

unexp!a'ined.

be t e s t e d

by f u t u r e

defined.points.. levels

HPN t e s t s

counts lay

shown t o

The p o s s i b l e populations future

of the single

estimates

between d i s s p o r e numbers and

were n o t c l o s e ,

possibly

above 50-100 (100 g s o i l ) " 1 ,

'saturate'

i,lportance

will

on ssmples from t h e same w e l l -

The r e l a t i o n s h i p s

of V A N . i n f e c t i o n

dias~ore ously

The s t a b i l i t y

remains

the roots

s range previ-

(Sanders and S h e i k h 1983).

of qualitative

is being investigated

because most

differences

end w i l l

i n t h e fungml

be c o n s i d e r e d a l s o i n

samplings.

REFERENCES FISHER, R . A . , cultural

YATES, F. S t a t i s t i C a l

and m e d i c a l r e s e a r c h .

SANOERS, F . E . , lsr

mycorrhizal

71:

223-246,

- Oliver

for

biological,

agri-

and Boyd, E d i n b u r g h ,

1963.

SHEIKH, N.A. The d e v e l o p m e n t o f v e s i c u i a r - a r b u s c u infection

in plant

root

systems.

- Plant

and S o i l

1983.

Jakobsen, I. and Heldmann, T., dlaspores in cultivated soils. 29:

tables

199-203~

1989: Agric.

MPN e s t i m a t e s o f VAM Ecosystems Environ.,