Phytochemistry\ Vol[ 37\ No[ 5\ pp[ 0992Ð0900\ 0887 Þ 0887 Elsevier Science Ltd[ All rights reserved Printed in Great Britain 9920Ð8311:87 ,08[99¦9[99
Pergamon PII] S9920Ð8311"86#99365Ð6
NAHOCOLS AND ISONAHOCOLS\ ENDOTHELIN ANTAGONISTS FROM THE BROWN ALGA\ SARGASSUM AUTUMNALE NAOKO TSUCHIYA\ AIYA SATO\ HIDEYUKI HARUYAMA$\ TOHRU WATANABE% and YASUTERU IIJIMA% Biomedical Research Laboratories\ $Analytical and Metabolic Research Laboratories\ and %Pharmacology and Molecular Biology Research Laboratories\ Sankyo Co[ Ltd[ 1!47 0!chome\ Shinagawa!ku\ Tokyo 039!9994\ Japan "Received in revised form 10 April 0886#
Key Word Index*Sar`assum autumnale^ Sargassaceae^ brown alga^ nahocols^ isonahocols^ aryl prenyl ether^ prenyl hydroquinone^ endothelin antagonists[
Abstract*Novel endothelin antagonists\ nahocols A\ A0\ B\ C\ D0 and D1\ and isonahocols D0 and D1\ were isolated from the brown alga\ Sar`assum autumnale[ Their structures were determined through detailed analysis of NMR spectra and chemical reactions[ Nahocols have an aryl prenyl ether structure\ which are speculated to be biogenetic precursors of the ubiquitous prenyl hydroquinones or prenyl benzoquinones in the plant and animal kingdoms[ Þ 0887 Elsevier Science Ltd[ All rights reserved
INTRODUCTION
Endothelin "ET!0# ð0Ł is an endothelium!derived 10! amino acid peptide[ It has a very potent vaso! constriction activity in isolated blood vessels and con! stitutes an ET family with its two isoforms\ ET!1 and ET!2\ and four highly homologous cardiotoxic peptides\ sarafotoxin S5aÐd[ ET has speci_c binding! sites on many cell membranes\ such as smooth muscle and the endothelial and epithelial cells of many organs[ The binding!sites have been grouped into two subtypes\ ETA and ETB based on ligand a.nity[ The obvious increase of ET!0 blood levels has been clini! cally observed in various diseases\ including acute renal insu.ciency\ acute myocardial infarction\ hypertension and arteriosclerosis[ ET receptor antag! onists may therefore be e}ective for the prevention and treatment of these diseases[ A variety of natural and synthetic antagonists ð1Ł has been found\ some of these are in clinical trials[ In the course of a programme for investigating new ET antagonists in marine organisms\ we screened extracts of marine organisms for inhibition of ET!0 binding to its receptors "ETA and ETB# and found that the brown alga\ Sar`assum autumnale\ produced endothelin antagonists ð2Ł[ We herein report on the isolation\ characterization and antagonistic activities of the novel antagonists "0aÐf\ 1aÐb#[ Sar`assum aut! umnale is a relatively rare brown alga\ found in shal! low and protected waters of limited coasts washed by the Tsushima Current[ Of great biological interest is
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed[
that S[ autumnale matures in summer\ while most other brown algae belonging to this taxon\ mature in early spring through early summer in Japan[
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Sar`assum autumnale was air!dried\ powdered and extracted with methanol at room temperature[ The methanol extract was partitioned between hexane and 89) aqueous methanol[ The antagonistic activity remained in the 89) aqueous methanol fraction\ con! taining a complex mixture of closely related compounds[ The 89) aqueous methanol extract was repeatedly separated by a combination of normal and reversed!phase chromatography guided by endothelin binding assay ð3Ł[ Nahocol A "0a#\ a colourless oil\ analysed for C18H31O5 by HREI mass spectrometry "ðMŁ¦ m:z 375[2990\ D ¦0[8 mmu#[ The IR indicated the pres! ence of hydroxyl "2349 cm−0#\ an ester "0629 cm−0# and carbonyl "0694 cm−0#[ The 0H NMR "Table 0# was consistent with the presence of a secondary\ a tertiary and three ole_nic methyls\ a proton on each carbon bearing an oxygen atom\ _ve ole_nic protons\ a methoxyl\ an isolated methylene and a trisubstituted aromatic ring[ In the 02C NMR "Table 0#\ signals assignable to 04 sp2 and 03 sp1 carbons were observed[ The sp2 carbons contained six methyls\ six methylenes\ two tertiary and a quaternary one[ The sp1 carbons comprised two trisubstituted double bonds\ a vinyl double bond and the trisubstituted aromatic ring\ in addition to the ketone and ester carbonyls[ 0a was converted to a diacetate "2a# and a methyl ether "2b#\
0992
0993
N[ TSUCHIYA et al[
Fig[ 0[ Structures of nahocols and their derivatives[
respectively\ compatible with the presence of a sec! ondary and a phenolic hydroxyl[ Treatment of 2a with dilute NaOH transposed the carbonyl from C!01? to C!02? to yield a diastereomeric mixture of 3a and 3b[ HMQC and relayed COSY experiments indicated the presence of 09 substructures "AÐJ# "Fig[ 1#[ Three protons at d 1[57 "H!00?#\ 3[75 "H!02?# and 0[94 "H! 08?# showed cross!peaks with C!01 at d 103[5\ sug!
gesting the connectivities of A\ B and C[ The proton "H!00?# also showed a cross!peak with C!8? "d 14[2#\ consistent with the connectivity of C and D[ The con! nectivity of D and E was supported by the long!range couplings of H!5? "d 4[94# and H!07? "d 0[44# to C!7? "d 28[3#[ The proton "H!07?# coupled to C!1? "d 032[5# and C!3? "d 31[9#\ and three vinyl protons ðd 4[06\ 4[07 "H!0?#\ 5[93 "H!1?#Ł also coupled to C!2? "d 70[6#[ These H!C correlations were compatible with the con! nectivity of EÐG[ Substructures "HÐJ# constituted a 1\4!dihydroxyphenylacetic acid "homogenistic acid# moiety\ any of whose hydroxyls made an ether linkage with F[ In the NOESY experiment\ NOEs were observed between an aromatic proton "H!2# and H!0?\ 3? and 06? "Fig[ 1#\ thus indicating that C!2? was connected to C!1 through an ether linkage\ because two aromatic protons must show NOE if the alternative ether link! age at C!4 is correct[ Nahocol!A\ consequently\ could be depicted as methyl 4!hydroxy!1!"O#!ð02?!hydroxy!
Table 0[ 0H and 02C NMR data of compounds 0a and 0b "CDCl2# 0a No[
Fig[ 1[ Substructures of compound 0a and their HMBC and NOE correlations[
Fig[ 2[ Substructures of compounds 0cÐf correlated by HMBC[
01?!oxo!2?\6?\00?\04?!tetramethyl!0?\5?"E#\03?!hexade! catrien!2?!ylŁphenylacetate "0a#[ The relative and absolute con_gurations at C!2?\!00? and !02? remain unclear[ Nahocol!A0 "0b#\ a colourless oil\ analysed for C18H31O5\ isomeric to 0a\ by HREI mass spectrometry "ðMŁ¦ m:z 375[1880\ D ¦9[8 mmu#[ The IR indicated the presence of hydroxyl "2599 and 2249 cm−0#\ ester "0629 cm−0# and carbonyl "0609 cm−0#[ The 0H NMR of 0b also closely resembled 0a "Table 0#\ indicating that they shared the same planar structure[ They were\ however\ stereoisomeric to each other at C!2?\ !00? or ! 02?[ Nahocol!B "0c#\ a colourless oil\ analysed for C18H31O4 by HREI mass spectrometry "ðMŁ¦ m:z 369[2908\ D −0[2 mmu#[ Although the spectral fea! tures were closely related to those of 0a\ the 0H and 02 C NMR suggested a substructure K\ in which the hydroxyl at C!02? of 0a was replaced by a hydrogen atom[ The diagnostic cross!peak between H!02? "d 2[03# and C!01? "d 102[7#\ together with other cross! peaks "Fig[ 2#\ were observed in the HMBC experi! ment[ Therefore\ nahocol!B could be assigned as methyl 4!hydroxy!1!"O#!ð01?!oxo!2?\6?\00?\04?!tetram ethyl!0?\5?"E#\03?!hexadecatrien!2?!ylŁphenyl! acetate "0c#[ Nahocol!C "0d#\ a colourless oil\ analysed for C18H33O5 by HREI mass spectrometry "ðM!H1OŁ¦ m:z 369[2906\ D −0[4 mmu# and had no carbonyl[ The DQFCOSY spectrum indicated the presence of a sub! structure L "Fig[ 2#\ in addition to EÐJ[ The HMBC could connect them to methyl 1!"O#!ð01?\02?!dihy! droxy!2?\6?\00?\04?!tetramethyl!0?\5?"E#\03?!hexadeca!
trien!2?!ylŁ!4!hydroxyphenylacetate "0d#[ On treat! ment with acetone dimethyl acetal in the presence of p!TsOH\ 0d gave a cis!acetonide "4a# "Fig[ 3#\ whose stereochemistry was assigned by NOE ð4Ł between H! 01? "d 2[79# and H!02? "d 3[67#[ The vicinal hydroxyls were therefore erythro to each other[ Nahocol!D0 "0e#\ and !D1 "0f#\ had the same molec! ular formula C18H31O5 determined by HREI mass spectrometry "0e] ðM!H1OŁ¦ m:z 357[1743\ D −1[1 mmu\ 0f] ðM!H1OŁ¦ m:z 357[1755\ D −0[9 mmu#\ and were diastereomeric to each other at C!01? or C!02?[ Although they resembled 0d in spectral features\ they were di}erent from 0d in the number of ole_nic methyls and double bonds] four methyls and four double bonds for 0e and 0f and three methyls and three double bonds for 0d[ The chemical shifts and splitting patterns ð0e] d 2[76 "d\ J 5[7 Hz#\ 0f] d 2[70 "d\ J 6[7 Hz#Ł of each H!01?\ which were related to C!00?\ !01? and !08? by HMBC "Fig[ 2#\ indicated that the double bond was located between C!09? and C! 00?\ and 0e and 0f could be assigned as diastreoisomers of methyl 1!"O#!ð01?\02?!dihydroxy!2?\6?\00?\04?!tetra! methyl!0?\5?"E#\09?"E#\03?!hexadecatetraen!2?!ylŁ!4! hydroxy phenylacetate[ 0e and 0f also gave cis! "4c# and trans! "4b# acetonides "Fig[ 3#\ respectively\ whose stereochemistry were determined by the respective NOEs between H!01? "d 3[42# and H!02? "d 3[83#\ H! 01? "d 2[86# and H!03? "d 4[06# and H!02? "d 3[34# and H!08? "d 0[55#[ Therefore\ 0e was erythro while 0f was threo[ Isonahocol D0 "1a# and isonahocol D1 "1b# could not be separated by HPLC on ODS and silica gel with a combination of solvents[ They could be only successful puri_ed by normal phase HPLC using nitrated silica gel\ NO1 with 09) i!propanol in hexane[ Isonahocol D0 "1a#\ a colourless oil\ had a molecular formula C18H31O5 "HREI mass spectrum ðM!H1OŁ¦
Fig[ 4[ Structures of compounds 1a and 1b[
0995
N[ TSUCHIYA et al[ Table 1[ 0H and 02C NMR data of compounds 0c and 0d "CDCl2# 0c
Fig[ 5[ Substructures of compounds 1a and 1b correlated by HMBC and NOE[
m:z 357[1773\ D −9[7 mmu# and its 0HÐ0H COSY and 0HÐ02C COSY spectra indicated the presence of a substructure N\ in addition to E and M[ The cross! peaks of H!0? with C!0\ !1 and !5 in the HMBC were consistent with N "Fig[ 5#[ The Z!con_guration of the C!1ÐC!2\ double bond was determined by NOEs[ 1a was therefore depicted as methyl 1\4!dihydroxy!2! ð01?\02?!dihydroxy!2?\6?\00?\04?!tetramethyl!1?"Z#\5? "E#\09?"E#\03?!hexadecatetraen!0?!ylŁphenylacetate[ Isonahocol D1 "1b# had the same molecular formula C18H31O5 "HREI mass spectrometry ðM!H1OŁ¦ m:z
357[1769\ D −9[4 mmu# as 1a[ The NOEs in a sub! structure O "Fig[ 5#\ in addition to other spectral properties\ showed that 1b di}ered from 1a in the stereochemistry of the C!1ÐC!2\ double bond\ and could be depicted as methyl 1\4!dihydroxy!2!ð01?\02?! dihydroxy ! 2?\6?\00?\04? ! tetramethyl ! 1?"E#\5?"E#\09? "E#\03!hexadecatetraen!0?!ylŁphenylacetate[ The vicinal hydroxyls of 1a and 1b were both erythro based on the formation of the corresponding cis!acetonides "5a\ b# "Fig[ 3#[ Many Sar`assums ð4Ð00Ł and their relatives ð00Ð02Ł frequently produce prenyl hydroquinones or prenyl benzoquinones\ while S[ autumnale contains nahocols\ with an aryl prenyl ether structure\ and isonahocols with a prenyl hydroquinone one[ It may be speculated that the latter are biosynthesized through Claisen rearrangement of the former[ Some isonahocol!type metabolites of 0aÐf were found in the extract\ but they have not yet been puri_ed[ Attempts to rearrange 0e to 1a chemically did not succeed because of their
Aryl phenyl esters from Sar`assum autumnale
0996
Table 2[ 0H and 02C NMR data of compounds 0e and 0f "CDCl2# 0e No[
instability under the reaction conditions[ In addition\ we are uncertain if nahocols and isonahocols are nat! urally occurring or obtained by esteri_cation of the corresponding carboxylic acids during methanolic extraction[ Endothelin antagonistic activities of the nahocols and isonahocols are listed in Table 4[ Although they are not always potent and selective\ they appeared to be somewhat ETB!selective[ EXPERIMENTAL
General[ 0H "399 MHz# and 02C NMR "099 MHz# were recorded in CDCl2 with TMS as an int[ standard[ IR were recorded in CHCl2[ UV and optical rotations were recorded in EtOH[ Silica gel "129Ð399 mesh# and packed Lobar columns ðSi!59 "normal phase# and RP! 07 "reversed!phase#Ł were used for low pressure CC or TLC[ Packed columns "19f×149 mm# of silica gel\ NO1 and ODS were used for prep[ HPLC[
Plant material[ Sar`assum autumnale was collected in shallow water "0 m deep# at the end of Omosu Bay\ Okino Shima\ Shimane Pref[\ Japan\ in June 0880[ It was authenticated by Prof[ M[ Kajimura of Oki Mar! ine Biological Experimental Station\ Shimane Uni! versity\ where a voucher specimen is kept[ Extraction and isolation[ The alga "2[4 kg#\ after washing\ was air!dried\ powdered and extracted ×2 with MeOH "19 l# at room temp[ The combined extracts were concd to dryness under red[ pres[ and then partitioned between hexane and 89) aq[ MeOH[ Concn of the active 89) aq[ MeOH layer under red[ pres[\ left a brown oil "039 g#[ Sepn was monitored by inhibition of each fr[ against ET!0 binding to a porcine lung ETB receptor ð3Ł[ The 89) aq[ MeOH extract "019 g# was subjected to silica gel CC "0[1 kg#[ Elution with a 09) gradient mixt[ of EtOAc in hexane gave Fr!0 "19Ð29) EtOAc\ 21[76 g\ 48) inhibition at 09 mg m−0#\ Fr!1 "19Ð29) EtOAc\ 8[83 g\ 099) inhi! bition at 09 mg m−0#\ Fr!2 "29Ð39) EtOAc\ 04[90
0997
N[ TSUCHIYA et al[ Table 3[ 0H and 02C NMR data of compounds 1a and 1b "CDCl2# 1a
09 mg ml−0#\ Fr!6 "EtOAc\ 6[40 g\ 75) inhibition at 09 mg ml−0# and Fr!7 "09Ð29) MeOH in EtOAc\ 01[03 g\ 24) inhibition at 09 mg ml−0#[ Fr!1 was subjected to silica gel CC "299 g#\ eluted with 14) EtOAc in hexane to yield Fr!1!0 "2[749 g#\ Fr!1!1 "0[231 g#\ Fr!1!2 "1[473 g# and Fr!1!4 "1[532 g#[ The combined frs Fr!1!1 and Fr!1!2 were again chromatographed on silica gel "079 g#[ Elution with CHCl2\ followed by a combination of CC ðSi!59 "14) Me1CO in hexane# and RP!07 "74) aq[ MeOH#Ł\ gave 0c "082[5 mg#[ Fr!3 "19 g# was subjected to silica gel CC "599 g#\ eluted stepwise with a mixt[ of EtOAc and hexane to give Fr!3!0 "29) EtOAc\ 223 mg\ 14) inhibition at 4 mg ml−0#\ Fr!3!1 "29Ð39) EtOAc\ 02[383 g\ 27Ð34) inhibition at 4 mg ml−0#\ Fr!3!2 "49) EtOAc\ 0[216 g\ 44[1) inhibition at 4 mg ml−0#\ Fr!3!3 "49Ð099) EtOAc\ 0[436 g\ 22Ð32) inhibition at 4 mg ml−0# and Fr!3!4 "49) MeOH in EtOAc\ 1[064 g\ 19[0) inhibition at 4 mg ml−0#[ Fr!3!1 "01[02 g# gave a major fr[ "6[106 g# after elution with 9[4) MeOH in CHCl2
Aryl phenyl esters from Sar`assum autumnale
on silica gel CC "0[1 kg#[ Prep[ HPLC "ODS\ 59) aq[ MeOH# gave a yellow oil "2[029 g# containing 0a and 0b[ This was subjected to RP!07 chromatography and elution with 69Ð79) aq[ MeOH gave 0a "805 mg# and a 0b!rich fr[ "75 mg#[ The latter was puri_ed by HPLC "silica gel 3) i!PrOH in hexane# to give 0b "12[8 mg#[ Fr!5 "0[71 g# was _rst subjected to CC ðRP!07\ 64) aq[ MeOH and Si!59 "04) i!PrOH in hexane#Ł\ the major fr[ from which was _nally puri_ed to 0e "040[5 mg# by RP!07 chromatography "49) aq[ ACN#[ The remainder "13[14 g# was subjected to silica gel CC "399 g×1# and eluted with 1[4) MeOH in CHCl2 to give Fr!5!0 "2[70 g#\ Fr!5!1 "0[21 g#\ Fr!5!2 "08[25 g#\ Fr! 5!3 "9[10 g#\ Fr!5!4 "0[91 g# and Fr!5!5 "0[04 g#[ Fr!5! 4 "0[91 g# was subsequently subjected to Si!59 "1) MeOH in CHCl2# and RP!07 chromatography "44) aq[ ACN# to give 0f "064 mg#[ Fr!5!2 "08[25 g# was separated by HPLC "ODS\ 49) aq[ ACN# into 09 frs ðFr!5!2!0 "186[6 mg#\ !1 "1[296 g#\ !2 "0[995 g#\ !3 "0[011 g#\ !4 "1[571 g#\ !5 "0e\ 401[7 mg#\ !6 "0[902 g#\ !7 "0[332 g#\ !8 "602 mg# and !09 "061 mg#Ł[ Fr!5!8 "602 mg# was further puri_ed to 0d "79[4 mg#\ 0e "35[1 mg# and 0f "32[3 mg# by CC ðRP!07 "59) aq[ ACN#\ Si!59 "CHCl2#Ł and HPLC "ODS\ 69) aq[ ACN#Ł[ Fr!5!1 "0[21 g# was subjected to RP!07 chromatography "49) aq[ ACN# and HPLC "NO1\ 09) i!PrOH in hexane# to give 1a "25[9 mg# and 1b "39[9 mg#[ Nahocol A "0a#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D −057[6> "c 9[88#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 375[2990 "ðMŁ¦\ D ¦0[8 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2349\ 0629\ 0509\ 0489\ 0384\ 0359\ 0309\ 0279\ 0259\ 0119\ 0199\ 0054\ 0099\ 819[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 194 "3[2#\ 114 "2[7#\ 182 "2[2#[ 0 H and 02C NMR "Table 0#[ Nahocol A0 "0b#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦09[4> "c 9[67#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 375[1180 "ðMŁ¦\ D ¦9[8 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0629\ 0609\ 0409\ 0359\ 0339\ 0279\ 0249\ 0209\ 0119\ 0089\ 0099\ 0999\ 759[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 196 "3[4#\ 182 "2[2#[ 0H NMR "Table 0#[ Nahocol B "0c#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D −8[6> "c 9[85#[ C18H31O4\ HREIMS "m:z# 369[2908 "ðMŁ¦\ D −0[2 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 1814\ 0629\ 0599\ 0324\ 0397\ 0269\ 0239\ 0179\ 0054\ 0989\ 889[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 193 "3[3#\ 117 "2[8#\ 182 "2[3#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 0#[ Nahocol C "0d#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦5[2> "c 9[60#[ C18H33O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 369[2906 "ðM!H1OŁ¦\ D −0[4 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0629\ 0694\ 0599\ 0384\ 0324\ 0309\ 0269\ 0239\ 0054[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 195 "3[1#\ 118 "2[7#\ 182 "2[2#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 1#[ Nahocol D0 "0e#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦1[5> "c 9[65#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 357[1743 "ðM!H1OŁ¦\ D −0[4 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0629\ 0509\ 0489\ 0384\ 0339\ 0069\ 0099\ 0909[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 195 "3[4#\ 117 "2[8#\ 182 "2[4#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 2#[ Nahocol D1 "0f#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦3[4> "c 9[84#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 357[1755 "ðM!H1OŁ¦\ D −0[9 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0629\ 0509\
0998
0489\ 0384\ 0339\ 0069\ 0099\ 0909[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 195 "3[3#\ 118 "2[8#\ 182 "2[3#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 2#[ Isonahocol D0 "1a#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦7[3> "c 9[72#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 357[1773 "ðM!H1OŁ¦\ D ¦9[7 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0609\ 0599\ 0359\ 0324\ 0264\ 0119\ 0039\ 0909[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 109 "3[3#\ 182 "2[4#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 3#[ Isonahocol D1 "1b#[ Colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D ¦7[5> "c 1[78#[ C18H31O5\ HREIMS "m:z# 357[1769 "ðM!H1OŁ¦\ D −9[4 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2599\ 2249\ 0609\ 0599\ 0359\ 0324\ 0264\ 0239\ 0119\ 0039\ 0099\ 0909[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 194 "3[5#\ 183 "2[4#[ 0H and 02C NMR "Table 3#[ Nahocol A0 diacetate "2a#[ To a soln of 0a "183[5 mg# in dry pyridine "9[4 ml#\ was added Ac1O "9[4 ml#[ The mixt[ was kept at room temp[ overnight[ The residue\ after usual work!up\ was puri_ed by Si!59 chromatography\ eluted with 29) EtOAc in hexane to give 2a "164 mg# as a colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D −012[7> "c 9[66#[ C22H35O7\ HREIMS "m:z# 469[2073 "ðMŁ¦\ D −9[8 mmu#[ IR "nmax cm−0# 0629\ 0509\ 0389\ 0324\ 0269\ 0239\ 0119\ 0084\ 0099\ 0904\ 854\ 819[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 191 "3[3#\ 114 "2[7#\ 167 "1[8#[ 0H NMR] d 0[91 "2H\ d\ J 5[6 Hz#\ 0[13Ð0[4 "1H\ m#\ 0[33 "2H\ s#\ 0[4Ð0[7 "1H\ m#\ 0[71 "2H\ d\ J 0[1 Hz#\ 0[75 "2H\ d\ J 0[1 Hz#\ 0[85 "1H\ t\ J 6[4 Hz#\ 1[9Ð1[0 "1H\ m#\ 1[02 "2H\ s#\ 1[15 "2H\ s#\ 1[54 "0H\ sixtet\ J 5[7 Hz#\ 2[47 "0H\ d\ J 05[0 Hz#\ 2[51 "0H\ d\ J 05[0 Hz#\ 2[57 "2H\ s#\ 4[98 "0H\ t\ J 6[0 Hz#\ 4[03 "0H\ d\ J 00[0 Hz#\ 4[08 "0H\ d\ J 06[5 Hz#\ 4[10 "0H\ d\ J 09[9 Hz#\ 4[79 "0H\ d\ J 09[9 Hz#\ 5[95 "0H\ dd\ J 00[0\ 06[5 Hz#\ 5[72 "0H\ dd\ J 1[8\ 7[8 Hz#\ 5[81 "0H\ d\ J 1[8 Hz#\ 6[92 "0H\ d\ J 7[8 Hz#[ 02C NMR] d 04[6 "CH2#\ 05[1 "CH2#\ 07[8 "CH2#\ 19[7 "CH2#\ 10[0 "CH2#\ 11[1 "CH1#\ 11[5 "CH2#\ 14[2 "CH1#\ 15[9 "CH2#\ 22[0 "CH1#\ 25[4 "CH1#\ 28[5 "CH1#\ 31[0 "CH#\ 31[3 "CH#\ 40[7 "CH2#\ 64[8 "CH#\ 71[9 "CH#\ 003[4 "CH1#\ 005[8 "CH#\ 006[7 "CH#\ 019[1 "CH#\ 012[7 "CH#\ 013[1 "CH#\ 015[5 "C#\ 024[0 "C#\ 031[5 "C#\ 032[3 "CH#\ 033[9 "C#\ 041[0 "C#\ 058[6 "C#\ 069[0 "C#\ 060[7 "C#\ 197[4 "C#[ Nahocol A0 methyl ether "2b#[ To a soln of 0a "029[0 mg# and MeI "9[06 ml# in dry DMF "0 ml#\ was added Ag1O "64 mg# and the mixt[ stirred at room temp[ overnight[ After the reaction was complete\ H1O and EtOAc were added to the reaction mixt[ The EtOAc layer was washed with H1O and satd[ NaCl soln\ suc! cessively\ and then dried over Na1SO3[ Concn of the EtOAc layer under red[ pres[ gave a yellow oil "096[3 mg#\ which was puri_ed by Si!59 chromatography "14) EtOAc in hexane# to give 2b "33[7 mg# as a colourless oil[ ðaŁ14 D −03[0> "c 9[38#[ C29H33O5\ EIMS "m:z# 499\ 371\ 357\ 085\ 053\ 72[ IR "nmax cm−0# 2349\ 0629\ 0694\ 0599\ 0384\ 0329\ 0269\ 0239\ 0299\ 0169\ 0109\ 0059\ 0099\ 0999\ 819[ UV ðlmax nm "log o#Ł 196 "3[2#\ 116 "3[0#\ 189 "2[4#[ 0H NMR] d 0[94 "2H\ d\ J 5[6 Hz#\ 0[1Ð0[3 "1H\ m#\ 0[31 "2H\ s#\ 0[45 "2H\ s#\ 0[6Ð0[64 "1H\ m#\ 0[79 "2H\ d\ J 0[0 Hz#\ 0[75
Acknowled`ements*The authors are indebted to Prof[ M[ Kajimura of Oki Marine Biological Exper! imental Station\ Shimane University\ and Prof[ Y[ Yokohama\ Director of Shimoda Marine Research Center\ University of Tsukuba\ for the collection and identi_cation of plant material[ REFERENCES
0[ Rubany\ G[ M[ and Poloko}\ M[ A[\ Phar! macolo`ical Review\ 0883\ 35\ 214[ 1[ Cheng\ X[!M[\ Nikan\ S[ S[ and Doherty\ A[ M[\ Current Medicinal Chemistry\ 0883\ 0\ 160[ 2[ Sato\ A[\ Watanabe\ T[\ Iijima\ Y[ and Haruyama\ H[\ Japan Kokai Tokkyo Koho\ 0883\ H5!145150[ 3[ Miyata\ S[\ Hashimoto\ M[\ Masui\ Y[\ Ezaki\ M[\ Takase\ S[\ Nishikawa\ M[\ Kiyoto\ S[\ Okuharam\ M[ and Kohsaka\ M[\ Journal of Anti! biotics\ 0881\ 34\ 63[ 4[ Kikuchi\ T[\ Miri\ Y[\ Yokoi\ T[\ Nakazawa\ S[\ Kuroda\ H[\ Masada\ Y[\ Kitaura\ Y[ and Kuri! yama\ Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin\ 0872\ 20\ 095[ 5[ Sato\ A[\ Terahara\ A[ and Hasegawa\ K[\ Japan Kokai Tokkyo Koho\ 0883\ H5!42695[ 6[ Numata\ A[\ Kanbara\ S[\ Takahashi\ C[\ Yoneda\ M[\ Fujita\ E[ and Nabeshima\ Y[\ Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin\ 0880\ 28\ 1008[ 7[ Numata\ A[\ Kanbara\ S[\ Takahashi\ C[\ Fujiki\ R[\ Yoneda\ M[\ Usami\ Y[ and Fujita\ E[\ Phyto! chemistry\ 0880\ 20\ 0198[ 8[ Segawa\ M[ and Shirahama\ H[\ Chemical Letters\ 0876\ 0254[ 09[ Kusumi\ T[\ Shibata\ Y[\ Ishitsuka\ M[\ Kino! shita\ T[ and Kakisawa\ H[ Chemical Letters\ 0868\ 166[ 00[ Faulkner\ D[ J[\ Natural Products Report\ 0883\ 00\ 244[ 01[ Banaigs\ B[\ Francisco\ C[ and Gonzalez\ E[\ Tetrahedron\ 0872\ 28\ 518[ 02[ Banaigs\ B[\ Francisco\ C[\ Gonzalez\ E[ and Fen! ical\ W[\ Phytochemistry\ 0872\ 11\ 1754[