New analysis of the perturbation of the C2 Ballik-Ramsay system from high-resolution Fourier spectrometry

New analysis of the perturbation of the C2 Ballik-Ramsay system from high-resolution Fourier spectrometry

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY 109, 334-344 (1985) New Analysis of the Perturbation of the C2 Ballik-Ramsay System from High-Resolution Fourier...

470KB Sizes 0 Downloads 12 Views

JOURNAL

OF MOLECULAR

SPECTROSCOPY

109, 334-344 (1985)

New Analysis of the Perturbation of the C2 Ballik-Ramsay System from High-Resolution Fourier Spectrometry F. ROUX,* G. WANNOUS,~

F. MICHAUD,*

AND J. VERGES+

*Laboratoire de Spectro&trie Ionique et Molkdaire. UniversitC Claude Bernard-Lyon I, 43 Boulevard du I I Novembre 1918. 69622 Villeurbanne. France; tFaculti des Sciences, Universite’ Libanaise. Beyrouth-Hadeth. Lebanon: and SLaboratoire Aimh Cotton, CNRS II, Brit. 505, 91405 Orsav. France

The b’Z;-a311, Ballik-Ramsay system of Cz perturbed by the ‘Zgf state was previously partially deperturbed. Therefore, errors were made in the assignment of lines around the perturbation. In this work, the perturbations observed in the b3Z; - u = 0, 1, 2, and 3 levels were completely reduced. The treatment required a theoretical model which includes secondorder terms in the off-diagonal interactions. 0 1985 Academic press, h.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of deperturbing a band system is to obtain parameters having physical significance, which may in turn, be used to predict frequencies of new transitions. Deperturbation techniques are especially important when the interacting state cannot be reached directly. The method of direct fitting of measured wavenumbers in band spectra has become increasingly sophisticated during the past few years. This method first requires the choice of a model Hamiltonian matrix written in terms of molecular constants. The eigenvalues of this matrix, obtained by diagonalization of the model Hamiltonian, are used to compute transition frequencies, which are then compared with experimental values. Then, least-squares adjustments of molecular parameters are made to give eigenvalues which reproduce the observed spectrum. This approach is particularly suitable to the fitting of perturbed spectra. The local perturbing state can be included directly in the Hamiltonian matrix, and this allows the coupling constants describing the interaction, as well as the usual molecular parameters of the perturbed and perturbing state, to be determined simultaneously in a statistically rigorous manner. The present work is concerned with a new Fourier transform study of the b3Z;-a311, Ballik-Ramsay system of C2 discussed in Ref. (I). In this previous analysis, the authors experienced some difficulty in achieving a complete reduction of the perturbations of the 32; state by the ‘2: state. When one type of perturbed level is taken into account, either F, or F3, the reduction is good, but in the 0022-2852185 $3.00 Copyright 0

1985 by Academic Press. Inc.

All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

334

ANALYSIS

OF THE

BALLIK-RAMSAY

335

SYSTEM

complete fitting the results are less satisfactory and the discrepancies between experimental and calculated wavenumbers lie between 10 X low3 and 80 X 10m3 cm-‘. The purpose of the present work has been to carry out a complete deperturbation of the perturbed Ballik-Ramsay system of Cz. This system has been excited in an electrodeless discharge through CO. The experimental conditions were described in a previous paper (2). The crossing points between the 32; state and the ‘2: state are illustrated in the plots of E, (cm-‘) against J(J t- 1) given in Fig. 1. The magnitudes of perturbations in the rotational levels of the 3Z; state are given in Table I.

I

/’

V=fj

,,$

/’ /

/’ I’

,,I’ /

/’

.’



E

,,-c=s

‘CITi’)

5000

10000

5000 1000

2000

3000

4000

J FIG. I. Total perturbations.

energy

curves

of the b3Z;

and the ‘Z+g states

(J+l)

of Cz for the location

of the studied

336

ROUX ET AL. TABLE I Perturbations in the Rotational Levels of the ‘2, State Perturbing state b32-

J

X12,’

g

(v)

F,

(v)

Level

50 0=

3

(+

52

0.099)

(-

0.170)

40 lb

4

5

62 (+

42

64

0.329)

(-

0.056)

50

52

(+

0.262)

(-

0.128)

(+

0.099)

(-

1.038)

(+

0.256)

(-

0.133)

(+

0.107)

(-

1.058)

(+

0.095)

(-

0.172)

(+

0.223)

(-

0.087)

(+

0.107)

(-

0.169)

(+

0.229)

(-

0.091)

(+

0.077)

(-

0.124)

(+

0.070)

(-

0.130)

26 zc

Level

F3

28

38

40

I2 gd

CO

6

Numbers

in

parentheses

denote

the

displacement

+ denotes

that

the

level

is

displaced

to

higher

-

that

the

level

is

displaced

to

lower

denotes

a)

Results

from

the

b)

Results

from

the

I-O

and

l-l

bands

c)

Results

from

the

2-O

and

2-1

bands

d)

Results

from

the

3-l

and

3-2

bands

of

the

energies

level

in

I4

cm

-I

:

and

energy

O-O band

THEORETICAL

MODEL

Following previous work (I), the matrix elements of the a311, state have been written taking into account the interactions with the 32:, ‘II,, and ‘2: states. by a ‘22: state, The energy matrix of the upper state, 3Z;, which is perturbed includes off-diagonal terms. To improve the deperturbation, it becomes necessary to include second-order terms in the off-diagonal interaction. The usual form of the first-order spin-orbit interaction is

The spin-spin Freed (3).

interaction

is zero,

according

to

calculations

performed

by

ANALYSIS OF THE BALLIK-RAMSAY

SYSTEM

TABLE II Matrix Elements of the 32; State Perturbed by the ‘2: State of the C2 Molecule

< 3’0

/“13x;

>=9&[2B3

-y Ceff

> = A*

-

4 Dy(x+l) + Hz(6x2+20x+E)]

3zeff

A1 (x+2) + A2x

Definitions of the parameters -----___-----__-___ _-----_-- ~(~ll). poll), s(~JI), o('Z*). o('ll) 20 0,(3lI) = z 311 b?L+)

P,(3w

- 1 3"

2 0 - E(311)]

4(ooBo* + Qo*Bo) [E(3Z+, - E(3WJ

46,2 9/n)

o,(‘n)

= z 3,

[E(3Z+) - E(+I)]

-1

[< -

3z+IHsO11n >]*

1, CE(3r+)-

E(‘il)~

[< 3z+[HSOl~e+ o$r+)

with

=

MS0 =

1 I~+

‘12

- E(‘r+)]

Hamiltonianepin-orbitre

2a, =
[E(3X+)

-<*=

111 AL+ 1 n-

0)

1 11 BL+ II n = 0 )

(convention de Freed)

x = .I (J+l) Upper and lower signs refer to e and f level> req,ertive;y

337

338

ROUX ET AL. TABLE III Laboratory Observations of the C2 Ballik-Ramsay System (cm-‘) v’

vll

0

1

2

5632.1002

(10)

1

7080.2330

(10)

5462.2264

(10)

2

8506.1912

120)

6888.1873

(15)

8292.0522

(16)

0

3 4

3

6697.3655

(14)

8079.2095

(12)*

5

*

7867.7682

unperturbed

(14)*

bands

The two parameters,

A, and AZ, representing

A,

=

c

the second-order

interaction,

are

(‘z”lt AL+132,)(32,1B(r)13Z”,) -6 - J%

U#d

and A2 =

c

(‘z”lmm)(‘&dl~ AL+13Z”,)

U#U

The matrix The matrix in H.

elements of the perturbed element of the perturbing

NUMERICAL

Ev - E, 32; state have been collected in Table II. state, ‘Xl, has been truncated at the term

ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTAL

RESULTS

The bands which were studied are listed in Table III. The experimental wavenumbers are deposited with the Editor of the Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy.’ The molecular constants of the perturbed 3Z, state are given in Table IV. A global treatment based on two bands was successfully applied to three vibrational levels (v = 1, 2, and 3). The unperturbed levels u = 4 and 2, = 5 were reached by one

’ Please write to F. Roux if you are interested in obtaining these data.

ANALYSIS OF THE BALLIK-RAMSAY

339

SYSTEM

TABLE IV Molecular Constants of the ‘2; State of C2 (cm-‘) v-0

3

2

1

O.LO32

(16)

0.1044

(10)

3 (14)

0.1075

0.1090

f? (15)

0.1078

5a (20)

0.1092

(20)

Lff B3

(21

1.44154

(2)

1.49049

(2)

1.47419

(2)

1.45784

0.6210

(8)

0.6223

(7)

0.6226

0.17

(6)

- 0.13

(4)

- 0.13

(5)

- 0.20

(6)

0.23

(9)

0.26

(9)

0.20

(14)

0.50

(20)

1.42514

(3)

1.40878

(3)

bff DL x 105

‘(3

x

IO2

-

(10)

0.6257

(14)

0.6238

- 0.392

(10)

0)

0.6261

- 0.410

Lff 11 HxX

10

B.rndS

2-o 2-I

1-o 1-1

o-o

0

0

3-1 3-2

4-2

5-3

b RMS

N

=

3.4

3.2

3.4

3.4

2.8

2.7

293

507

415

402

131

95

TABLE V Parameters of the C, b3Z; State (cm-‘)

*a&

5632.1039

we

1470.374

WeXe

(10) (7) (3)

11.143

WeYe

0.0128

(4)

BCe

1.49864

(5)

%

0.01629

(3)

YB

-

Dde

x

BeJO

0.6200

(18)

0.0015

(8)

0.1019

(12)

0.0021

(5)

-

Ee e %

-

(5)

0.000009

105

2 aT b

"

=

The

Te

+ we

origin

of

("4)

T

is

-w

x ee

v=

0

("+$)

level

3 + WeY,

of

a3nu

("++

state

2 c

Bv

=

Be

-

aB

(v+$

+

eB

(v++)

3 +

yB

+

...

2 dD

e

" E"

= De

=

Ee

+

-

O-D (v+$

aF

'v+$

1

+

8,

iv+

+

....

4 + WeLe

("+$

+

....

(Y+$

+

....

(10)

(5)

340

ROUX ET AL. TABLE VI Parameters (cm-‘) between the b’Z; and XlF&f States of C2

InteWtiOn Perturbing state x1x+

This

work

(12)

AMIOT

3

0

2.36

1

2.73

(61

x IO4

Al

CY?

4

b

a

ff

b3C-

t”;

x 104

*2

2.72

(30)

1.39

(4)

1.19

(4)

2.63

(40)

1.25

(3)

1.07

(2)

(4)

0.49

(3)

5

2

2.05

(5)

2.23

(10)

0.57

6

3

0.82

(2)

0.35

(10)

0

0

a Value

obtained

when

A2

is

set

equal

to

zero

Value

obtained

when

A,

is

set

equal

to

zero

zero

when

b

A,

or

A2 are

significant

set

equal

to

it

is

not

possible

to

obtain

value.

TABLE VII Rotational Perturbation* in the F, u = 2 Level (2-1 Band) Observed Minus Calculated Wavenumbers (cm-‘) P

J

R

a

-*

b

21 22 + 0.026

23

-

+ 0.041

25

-

-

0.000

+ 0.046

-

o.oM)

0.004 + 0.107

26 27

+ 0.108

+ 0.001

-

0.176

-

-

0.037

+ 0.005

-

0.024

-

-

28 29

-

31

0.169

0.042

+ 0.021

32 33

-

+ 0.029

+ 0.003

+ 0.040

-

+ 0.105

+ 0.001

-

0.174

+ 0.000

-

0.044

+ 0.000

-

0.030

-

x

10

+ 0.002

-

-

0.001

0.002

0.001

-L l

a

F1e F2. F3

before

simultaneously

reduction

b after

reduction

fitted

0.001

0.002

0.001

30

-

+ 0.031 0.004

24

b

a

(RMS

:

3,4

-3

cm

-1)

0.007

ANALYSIS OF THE BALLIK-RAMSAY

341

SYSTEM

TABLE VIII Rotational Perturbation* in the F3 u = 2 Level (2-1 Band) Observed Minus Calculated Wavenumbers (cm-‘) P

J

R b

a

33 34 35 36 37

+ 0.036

+0.001

+ 0.060

+ 0.002

+ 0.001

+ 0.036

+0.058

+0.001

+0.226

-0.001

-a.091

+0.003

+0.229

38 39

43

-0.035

-0.018

l

a b

Fl,F before after

2 ’

F3

simultaneously

+0.054

*O.OOl

+0.221

-0.003

-0.091

+ 0.005

- 0.038

+o.ooi

-0.024

-0.001

+ 0.001

+0.002

44

+ 0.002

+0.001

-0.034

42

+0.033

+o.ooo

-0.091

40 41

b

a

+0.001

fitted

(RMS

:

3,4

x

IO

-3

cm

-1)

reduction reduction

band only. The equilibrium values of the molecular constants for the ‘2; state are presented in Table V. The interaction parameters between the 3E; and ‘2; states are listed in Table VI. This table also gives a comparison between the values of the first-order spin-orbit terms obtained in this work and those found by Amiot et al. (I). The values are of the same magnitude, and they fulfill the theoretical predictions made by Clementi (4) and Veseth (5). It should be noted that only the F3 level of u = 3 is observed (as shown in Table I), which explains why the quoted uncertainty of this level is relatively large. A simultaneous determination of the second-order parameters, A, and AZ, is not possible. Various tests show that they are of the same order of magnitude, and that they are of equal importance as regards the improvements they make to the theoretical model. Tables VII and VIII show the contribution of these parameters for the F, and F3 levels, respectively, of the vibrational level o = 2 of the 3x; state close to the perturbation. To conclude this work, we have calculated the coefficients for the development of the total wavefunction of the 3Z; state which is perturbed by the pure F,,F3, and ‘2; wavefunctions. From this we have deduced the mixing coefficients of F,,

342

ROUX ET AL.

FIG. 2. Variations against J of the percentage of the character F, (- - -), F3 (p), the perturbed F, (u = 2) level.

and ‘Zg+(-a-) in

Fj, and ‘Zi, respectively, with all the other states. Figures 2, 3 and 4 illustrate the variation of these coefficients. CONCLUSION

We have improved the study of the perturbation of the ‘2; state by the ‘Zl state. The introduction of a second-order parameter allows the model to be somewhat refined. The noticeable effect is that the perturbations are reduced to the limit imposed by the accuracy of the experiments (2 or 3 X 10m3cm-‘). The results given by Amiot et al. (I) arise from a fit taken from one level alone (F,or F3), and the root mean square of the residuals was given as 7.3 X 10m3cm-‘. Similarly, a fit including the whole system gave a standard deviation of 80 X lop3 cm-]. A slightly more detailed investigation of the experimental results for the different transitions has shown that these anormalies stem both from an incomplete model for the deperturbation of the band (it included only the first-order terms in the off-diagonal interaction) and from errors in the assignment of lines around the

FIG. 3. Variations against J of the percentage the perturbed Fj (u = 2) level.

of the character

F, (- - -), F, (-),

and I&Z (-.

FIG. 4. Variations against J of the percentage the perturbing ‘2: (u = 5) level.

of the character

F, (- - -). F2 (-),

and ‘Zb

(-

-) in

.

-) in

344

ROUX

ET AL.

perturbations. Furthermore, the results confirm observations in the Phillips system b’II,-X12,+ (6). A new deperturbation of this system is currently in progress. RECEIVED:

June

22,

1984 REFERENCES

I. C. AMIOT, J. CHAUVILLE, AND J. P. MAILLARD, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 75, 19-40 (1979). 2. C. EFFANTIN, F. MICHAUD, F. Roux, J. d’INCAN, AND J. VERGES, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 92, 349-362 ( 1982). 3. K. F. FREED, J. Chem. Phys. 45,42 14-4241 (1966). 4. E. CLEMENTI AND K. S. PITZER, J. Chem. Phys. 32,656-662 (1960). 5. L. VESETH, Canad. J. Phys 53,299-302 (1975). 6. J. CHAUVILLE, J. P. MAILLARD, AND A. W. MANTZ, J. Mol. Spectrosc. 68, 399-411 (1977).