J. Phys Chtm. Solid1 Vol. 42. pp. 19-22 Pcrgdmon Press Ltd.. 1981. Printed hn Greal Bnufn
NEWCRYSTALLINEPHASESOFANEQUIATOMICK-CsALLOY ATLOWTEMPERATURE U. SHMUELI Department
of Chemistry,
Tel Aviv
UniversiIy.
Ramat
Aviv.
Israel
and V. STElNgERG,t Department
of Physics
(Received
and A. VORONEL
T. SVERBILOVA
and Astronomy, 25 April
Tel Aviv
University.
1979; accepted
2 May
Ramaf
Aviv,
Israel
1980)
Abstract-Solid equiatomic K-Cs alloys have been investigated by X-ray diffraction Ihroughout the temperature range 3WIOOK. The results indicate that a phase separation occurs below 18SK accompanied b the appearance of x and c = I l.W2) A an ordered phase in this range. This phase has a hexagonal lattice with parameters: (I =9.32(l) (at 170Kl. Evidence from our other studies[‘l] indicates that its composilion is K$Zs. Another phase transformation in this ordered crvstal is observed below I2OK. There is no change of lattice symmetry but the unit cell constants (at IGK). The Iransformaiion can be ascribed IO a shrink to the values: a =9.llII)A and c = 10.8&2)1/ rearrangement of the electronic structure of Cs.
INTROWCTION
The present communication deals with the X-ray patterns of equiatomic K-Cs alloys at low temperatures. The simplicity and ease of preparation of these alloys make them attractive objects of study for trying to understand the structural properties of alloys, especially the formation of disordered solid solutions[ I]. The crystal structures of these disordered solid solutions were investigated below 234K and it was concluded]?, 31 that their structure is b.c.c. Simon et al. [4] found a phase separation K-Cs below 18OK and have reported the existence of two intermetallic compounds, KzCs and K,Ck, under the separation curve. On the other hand, no phase separation above 78K was found in earlier thermographic experiments by Tracy Hall el al.[S], presumably because of the high rate of cooling employed in their measurements. Our own resistivity, slow thermographic and heat capacity measurements for various K-Cs alloy compositions[6,7] confirm the occurrence of phase separation in K-Cs below 185K. However, when the rate of cooling was increased above lOV/hr, no phase separation was found in agreement with[5]. We found no evidence for the existence of a K,Cs, phase, but our data definitely confirms the persistence of a K,Cs phase[7]. Since an assessment of the results obtained in[7] suggested to us that the phenomenon of atomic ordering may also be of importance, we decided to carry out an X-ray diffraction study of K-Cs below 18SK. X-Ray diffraction patterns from equimolar K-Cs solutions were obtained throughout the temperature range: 295-IODK. The composition of this alloy corresponds to an azeotropic point, which ensures no segregation as a
result of crossing the liquidus-solidus line under equilibrium conditions (see Fig. I). AlLdjfFraction patterns of K-Cs taken in the range 233-385K contain no powder lines, but they show a diffuse background which increases with decreasing temperature and they display a small number of single-crystal spots. This is consistent with previous[2] evidence on the formation of a chemically disordered (e.g. atoms K and Cs randomly distributed) solid solution in this temperature range. A sharply detailed powder pattern appears and persists throughout the l85-120K range and further cooling below 120K resulted in the appearance of another new powder pattern. The single-crystal spots, characteristic of the “warmest” solid phase persist throughout the temperature range investigated. So we have reason to believe that below 185K we obtain a two-phase system consisting of the atomically ordered KzCs crystalline phase and disordered K,Cs,_, mixed crystals. This could be in agreement with the coexistence curve reporTZ 70 I------
0K
tFrom July 1980. the authors address is-Department of Physics. University of California. Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
Fig.
19
1
---&----
L --40 m
I. Liquidus-solidus
Atomic
Eio -.-.
per ten?
relationship the K-Cs
in the diagram
system.
j
00
CS
of state for
20
U. SHMUELI
ted in141 if we remove the powder
patterns
our samples
the K,Cs,,-compound.
we obtain
are completely
However,
for the ordered
portion
wherein of
the
cylindrical
different.
formation
of
transfer The samples
of K-Cs
cesium
(Merck,
99.95%)
in a glove
amounts
of Hz0
After
the alloys
carefully
All
prepared and
box
under
from
commercial
potassium
(Ventron,
argon
and O2 impurities were prepared,
weighed mm) which
the samples
by thoroughly they
(diameter were
sealed
atmosphere,
not exceeding
components.
into glass capillaries -0.01
were
99.98%)
had equimolar
side
the
the glove
compositions
inside
box.
of K and
The capillary single-crystal axis
employed distance filtered
with the K-Cs goniometer
of a precession
camera.
as a flat plate
camera,
of 60 mm, using unfiltered Molybdenum
Temperature cooling
sample
head which
system,
radiation
control
consists
nitrogen
evaporator
of
The with
Exposures,
an with
Fig. 2. Single-crystal
instrument
on a to the was
specimen-to-film
the
(AtKa)
= 0.7107 with
by Enruf-Nonius. automatically a double
diffraction
A).
tition
the aid of a Delft. refilled
stream
patlern
reached
con-
tube.
was removed,
of flow
Dewar
temperature.
were
were
usu-
In several as follows:
a
the outlet
of
between
sample.
the required resulting
tubes
that the specimen
quenched
was inserted the
was tem-
system.
the required
and
The
precise below,
measurements
background
typical
temperature are based
and
after
the
temperature,
in a rapid of
the
on specific
on equimolar
for a disordered
a
on the warmer rate
or Debye-Scherer,
was
of
the cold N? stream
Glass
the cooling laue
aid
? mm away
cold
the par-
freezing
of the
alloy. quoted
wi:h diffuse
tube
had reached
The
a
outlet
and the required
by heating
the alloy
partition
liquid
arrangement.
each exposure
either
transfer
stream
A constant
the
about
of the sample,
transfer
however,
cardboard
The
the capillary with
after it had been ascertained
had slowly cases,
as well as zirconium-
was achieved
produced
system
was mounted was attached
part
throughout
ally taken
by
thus preventing
sample.
with
measured
obtained
the outlet
employed
cs.
dial
during were
the
was positioned
the gas stream.
peratures
thickness
on
co-axial
was
which
the irradiated of
is surrounded
N2 stream,
sample.
temperature
maintained
introduced
wall
off inside
from
mixing
were
-02mm.
the
stream
crystals
the K-Cs
The
gas
was kept
thermocouple,
I ppm.
N2
ice
tube
taining
EXPERMENTAL
cold
shell of a warm
K-Cs
phase
transitions.
heat and resistivity samples[7].
cubic Aid
solution.
New
crystalline
phases of an equiatomic
RESULTS
A qualitative
description
observed
in the various
explored.
is presented
The only feature the intensity of
temperature in Table
ranges
distribution
of the powder
which
were
the
patterns
is that
concentration
from
equiatomic
The
lower
from
equilibrium
rather
patterns
by cooling several regularly
random
taken or by
single
tensity
intensity
dis-
representative
observed
in ranges
(III)
reproduced
increases
distortions
up the Since
as the lower with
(II).
spots.
the intensity limit
deviations
scattering
temperature.
temperature pattern.
goes taken
with
is brought seen in (II).
0
0
I I
0
I 0
I 0 0
I I
2 0
3
1 0
I 0
3 I
0 I
I 4
2 0 4 3 I 0 2 I 4 4 0 0 3 0 4 2 I 5 3 I 5 4 I 4 3 I 6 2 2 7 4 3 I 5 0 6 7 0 0 (1 =9.32(1)A c= ll.8Of2)A
8.25 A
us s (‘s v(‘s
L’s
ms w
m m L‘s
s
m m ms m w
m w I4
w w H Iv
6.68 4.58 4.01 3.67 3.05 2.91 2.69 2.62 2.49
8.07 A 6.60 4.66 4.03 366 3.05 2.95 2.69 2.62 2.49
superimposed The
patterns patterns
2.38 2.24 2.10 2.02 I .98 I .88 I .62 I.51 I .48 1.37 1.32 1.24 I.15
2.38 2.24 2.12 2.02 I.99 I .87 I.62 I.51 1.48 1.37 I .32 I .25 I.15
0 0
I 2 2 2 I 3 I 4
I 0 0 I 0 0 0 0
2 4 4 3 4 5 6
0 I 2 I I I
I
c=
into
2. Qualitative
description
range
(‘s
I 0 0 I 0 4 2 5 0
5 cs N’S (‘5 s rs s
5 I 0 6 5 4 3
at
l70-IIOK.
However.
in the coldest
range (IV)
observed
H H !A
spots
a =9.11(1) 10.86f2) A
of the diffraction
in ranges
7.89 6.38 4.55 3.94 3.71 2.98 2.57 2.37 2.09 I .97
I.91 1.70 I .49 1.39 I .35 I.25 I.14
1.90 1.70 I .49 1.39 I.35 I.26 I.14
A r,,,, = 780 A’
patterns
II
paltern
(2)
+ Single crystal pattern (no diffuse background)
IRSK Powder
pattern
( I)
+ Single crystal pattern (no diffuse background)
I 233K
Single crystal pattern
Broad liquid rings al:
+ Diffuse
background
(see Fig. 2)
0= 2.47: 4.91: 8.47.
persist
in the
differ
in range (III).
1.16 8, 6.41 4.54 3.97 3.70 2.95 2.53 2.31 2.10 I .98
: H u
the
single-crystal
those observed
1
(III).
crystal
taken
patterns.
0
III IIOK
Powder
is
range-(111
Range and temperature IV
A
192K.
and a powder
I&.,, = 887 A’
Table
in-
down.
single
observed
from
The powder
I I
at
has
Its
disappears
I. Powder patterns of ordered K-G in ranges III and IV. The unit cell dimensions are given along with their estimated standard deviations fin parentheses. in units of Ihe last decimal place)
I
further crystal.
in Fig. 2.
significantly
of
for this
the
distorted
diffuse
on
diffraction
is obtained.
powder
that
real
with termal
temperature
diffraction
of the
temperature
is the
when
background.
pattern
on a
to conclude
local
diffuse
specimen,
superimposed
it is reasonable
connected
Table
2 2
spots
background.
is approached,
2 I
warming
range
are responsible
the
dependence
decreases
overall
throughout
crystal
peaked
of this background range (II)
connected
opposite
As the
Diffraction whether
thermal
the
rings in this range
21
phenomenon.
and (IV).
display
alloy at low !rmpcraturc
Background mentioning,
of the broad
resembles
patterns,
2.
of range (I 1, worth
temperatures
tribution
of the diffraction
K-C<
A
(Ill)
and (IV)
22
u. SHMUELI
were indexed
by the procedure
possible
to account
for
assuming
hexagonal
lattices
and c axes, in the above procedure,
indices,
well
as calculated
cell
dimensions
and
led
to
unit
cell
these
thermal results,
between
different
a axes
angle
values.
intensities, are given
in Table
point
III.
IV
cell volume shrinkage
due
without that
Similar contraction
A,
sures exceeding
c =
precise
However.
of pure
40 Kbar
of
this
arrange-
it seems
plausible
change
of volume
is
structure
of
of the electronic
observations
to
with the
nature
of the atomic
the above-mentioned
volume
be ascribed
above. the
a knowledge
to a rearrangement
could
I) in comparison
mentioned
to explain
in this structure.
assume
than
(see Table
at l20K
is difficult
ment
is far more
Cs]lO].
were crystalline
reported
for
Cs under
to
the pres-
[ I I ].
aniso-
According
to region
which contraction
I. It
a =9.33(l)
in region
thermal
taken at
V = 879 A’, thus indicating
expansion
as
and unit
photograph
dimensions
The
observed
shrinkage
It
by their
of the reflections,
the transition
by
the usual indexing
Bragg
volumes,
It was
lines
were refined
out that a powder
I I .66(2) 8, and volume tropic
After
relative
spacings
should be pointed
et 01[8].
observed
with slightly
ranges.
fit to the indexed
including
120K
the
the unit cell dimensions
least-squares results,
of Henry
all of
to
must
lie
Acknowledgemenls-The United States-Israel
work is partially supported Binational Science Foundation.
by
the
I10 and 120 K. REFERENCS CONCLUSIOY
The
existence
agreement K-Cs,
of
with
described
However, Simon
a new
the
phase
by Steinberg
the
powder
el a/.[41
differs
In fact,
it was
from
new feature
the
volume
existing
ordered phases. as well,
III
can KzCs
to index
unit
cell
higher
that
the
our
work
by
I (111).
pattern
(III)
author. is our evidence
phase below
120K.
being a sharp decrease compared
diffraction
with
patterns
to a phase
disordered
The same separation but the ordered
of
the
in
phase
temperature.
be ascribed and
observed
in Table
by the above
difference
of the
at slightly
It appears range
that shown
of the present
is in
ordering
and by Simon[9].
pattern
of a new crystalline
its most conspicuous
l85K
and
et o/.(7]
not possible
for the existence
below
diffraction
using the unit cell published The
phase separation
K,Cs,,_,,
seems to persist phase
observed
separation
undergoes
in into
crystalline in range IV a significant
I. Hansen M. and Anderko K.. Consfifufion of Binary A//OK -.,-. 2nd Edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1958). 2. Rinck E.. Comof. Rend. 197. 1404 (1933). 3. Bohm B.‘and Klemm W.. Z. Anorg. Chem. 243, 69 (1939) 4. Simon A., Bramer W., Hillenkotter B. and Kullmann H. J.. Z. Anonz Alla. Chem. 419. 253. (1976). 5. Goat&J. R.. Ott J. B. and Tracy Hall H. Jr., 1. Chem. Engng. Data 16. 83 (1971). 6. Steinberg V.. Sverbilova T. and Voronel A.. Proc 7th @mu on Thetkophysical Properties, May 1977, NBS, Gaithersburn Marvland. U.S.A. (1977): and Proc. l5fh Inf. Conf ~WI Temderafure Physics. (LT-IS) Grenoble. France (l97j78;: 7. Steinberg V.. Sverbilova T. and Voronel T.. 1. Phys. Chem. Solids. to be published (1980). 8. Henrv N. F. hf.. Lipson H., Wooster W. A.. The Inferprefofion of X-ray Diflrucfion Phofographs. Macmillan. London (l%lJ. 9. Bauhofer W.. Simon A.. Z. Nafurforsch 32a. 1275 (1977). IO. Sternheimer R.. Phys. Rev. 78. 235 (1950). II. Jayaraman A.. Newton R. C. and McDonough J. M.. Phys. Rev. IS9. 527 (1967).
Low