New flow injection method for quality control of dietary supplements containing L-carnitine using extraction mediated by Sodium taurodeoxycholate coacervate coupled to molecular fluorescence Andrea C. Isaguirre, Gimena Acosta, Soledad Cerutti, Liliana P. Fernandez PII: DOI: Reference:
S0026-265X(16)30112-6 doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.06.025 MICROC 2515
To appear in:
Microchemical Journal
Received date: Revised date: Accepted date:
29 March 2016 21 June 2016 24 June 2016
Please cite this article as: Andrea C. Isaguirre, Gimena Acosta, Soledad Cerutti, Liliana P. Fernandez, New flow injection method for quality control of dietary supplements containing L-carnitine using extraction mediated by Sodium taurodeoxycholate coacervate coupled to molecular fluorescence, Microchemical Journal (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2016.06.025
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT New flow injection method for quality control of dietary supplements containing L-carnitine using extraction mediated by Sodium
SC
RI
PT
taurodeoxycholate coacervate coupled to molecular fluorescence
Instituto de Química de San Luis (INQUISAL), Centro Científico Tecnológico (CCT) San
MA
a
NU
Andrea C. Isaguirrea,b, Gimena Acostaa,c, Soledad Ceruttia,d, Liliana P. Fernandeza,d,*
Luis. UNSL-CONICET. Chacabuco 917, San Luis. ARGENTINA (5700) Área de Biología, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis.
Control de Calidad de Medicamentos, Área de Gestión en Calidad y Salud, Facultad de
AC CE P
c
TE
D
b
Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis. d
*
Área de Química Analítica, Facultad de Química, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional de San Luis.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed
e-mail:
[email protected] (L.P. Fernández) 1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract Carnitine (CAR) is an essential component of the tissue of animals, higher plants and many
PT
microorganisms; it plays an important role during the metabolism of the human body. CAR
RI
transfers fatty acids to the place of burning-mitochondria and aids the transformation of fats
SC
into energy and this way support overweight reduction and immediate physical performance, increases resistance from physical load and protect heart from overload. In
NU
this study, a new methodology for the determination of L- CAR by molecular fluorescence
MA
is described, after derivatization with a fluorescence active substance, 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate. An on line coacervation process was used in order to isolate the analyte of
D
the complex matrix. The developed methodology was successfully applied to the control of
TE
carnitine content in dietary supplements. The detection limit and quantification obtained were 2.4x10-8 mol L-1 and 7.30x10-8 mol L-1; respectively. Recoveries between 82 and
AC CE P
103% were obtained. At optimized working conditions, the sample throughput was 30 samples h-1 (without consider the required time for L-CAR derivatization). Thus short analysis and very low running costs comparing with the LC/MS conventional methodology can be cited as the main advantages of the on line coacervation with fluorescence detection proposed methodology.
Keywords: Flow Injection Analysis; Fluorescence Detection; Bile Salt Coacervation; LCarnitine; Pharmaceutical Quality Control. 2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction Carnitine (γ-trimethyl-β-hydroxybutyrobetaine, CAR) is an endogenous metabolite
PT
found in most mammals. It is synthesized in tissues such as brain, liver, and kidney from
RI
the amino acids lysine and methionine [1-4]. CAR is involved mainly in depleting the
SC
formation of free radicals in various tissues, maintaining the cellular concentration of free coenzyme A [5], eliminating potentially toxic compounds, and transporting long chain fatty
NU
acids to the mitochondrial or peroxisomal matrix for its β-oxidation [6, 7]. Skeletal muscle
MA
is the major reservoir of CAR (approximately 95%) under its biological active form, LCAR, and approximately three quarters of this reserve comes from the diet (mainly meat
D
and derivatives and, more recently, from dietary supplements) [8]. Based on nutritional
TE
studies carried out in humans, it has been proposed that the daily need for L- CAR is between 2 and 12 µmol kg-1 (0.3 to 1.9 mg kg-1) of body weight day-1. However, these
AC CE P
amounts are higher in athletes or pregnant women [9]. Deficiency of this metabolite is related to several pathologies including dyslipoproteinemia, anorexia, dyspepsia, cardiac arrhythmias, erectile dysfunction, and others [10, 11]. In this context, the development of new, fast and simple methods for routine determination of CAR is of great interest for the quality control of dietary supplements and other dosage forms. To date, there is available a number of methods for CAR determination, and most of them involve high performance liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis coupled to tandem mass detection or UV direct or indirect detection [7,12-14]. On the other hand, several chromatographic techniques with fluorescent detection has been developed for L-CAR and related compounds [15-17] Examples are found in the US Pharmacopoeia [18], and European Pharmacopoeia [19].
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Also, electrochemical methods have been proposed [8, 20, 21]. More recently, the use of flow injection (FI) strategies with acid hydrolysis have been assayed in association with
PT
tandem mass spectrometry for quantification of plasma free and total CAR. Also a strategy
through the NADH fluorescence detection [22, 23].
RI
by L-carnitine dehydrogenase enzyme was used for indirect determination of the L-CAR
SC
CAR does not present fluorescent emission, and therefore for molecular fluorescence
NU
detection it is necessary a pre-derivatization step with a fluorophore. Antecedents available in bibliography show that 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) is an adequate reagent
MA
to enhance UV sensitivity of carnitine (Fig. 1), but also to give fluorescent activity to this compound [24].
D
As an alternative to HPLC methods, FI schemes could be designed to offer a significant
TE
improve in the sampling throughput, economy of the sample and reagents, minimizing the
AC CE P
wastes generated; furthermore, FI schemes are easy to couple with different optical detectors. The experimental setup usually involves selecting an extraction/retention agent, and an adequate interfacing manifold [25]. In this scenario, surfactant mediated extractions (SME) have become popular to enrich and/or recover biological compounds from matrices of different nature [26]. Despite most SME are performed in batch mode, there is an increasingly number of reports dealing with their utilization in flow injection analysis (FIA) formats [27-29]. On-line SME offers advantages in terms of better sensitivity and precision as well as of a significant reduction of the amounts of the sample and reagents required and wastes generated. In some of these applications, high temperature was required to induce phase separation. However, elevated temperature, in addition of the experimental difficult that represent, may affect the stability of thermally labile analytes.
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Bile salts (BS) are biosurfactants that are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver. BS micelles, such as sodium taurodeoxycholate (NaTDC), have unique properties including
PT
that it does not foam and scatter light; and other features and characteristic that have been
RI
discussed in a previous work In the previous report, the bile salt sodium cholate was evaluated as coacervate agent for the preconcentration/separation of the coloring dye
SC
Rhodamine B in food condiments [30]. Aqueous solutions of BS, such as NaTDC, can form
NU
coacervate phases in the presence of additives such as quaternary ammonium surfactants, alcohols or acids. BS have been used in coacervation processes at room temperature and
MA
successfully applied to varied analytes [31, 32].
The aim of this work was to develop a new method for L- CAR determination in dietary
D
supplements. This is an alternative method that uses, for the first time, a flow injection
TE
scheme that joins the extraction efficiency and specificity of NaTDC towards the L- CAR -
AC CE P
FMOC derivative, with the reproducibility and sensitivity of molecular fluorescence (MF). The study focused on sensitivity and spectrofluorimetric characteristics at first, which involves experimental conditions for derivatization of L- CAR with FMOC and reaction conditions for coacervate extraction. To this aim, a batch scheme was employed. In a second stage, the extraction/enrichment characteristics were suited to on-line process pointing not only to reduce reagent and sample consumption, but also to enhance sensitivity and sure reproducibility. The conditions studied were the sample loading flow rate, the loading times and volume, and the elution agents, concentrations and time in an on-line manifold to form the FI extraction system. After optimization, this proposed method was applied for determination of L- CAR in commercially available dietary supplements samples, for quality control.
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.
Materials and methods
2.1 Chemicals and Reagents
PT
L-Carnitine (L- CAR) inner salt, 98% was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
RI
USA). 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) and Sodium taurodeoxycholate were
SC
obtained from (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, United States). Absolute ethanol, hydrochloric acid, acetonitrile and sodium carbonate were purchased from (Merck,
NU
Darmstadt, Germany), were acquired as indicated and used as received without further
MA
purification. Ultrapure water (18 MΩ cm) was obtained from EASY pure (RF Barnstead,
D
IA, USA). All other reagents employed in this study were of analytical grade quality.
TE
2.2 Instrumentation
A Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrofluorimeter (ShimadzuCorporation, Analytical Instrument
AC CE P
Division, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with a Xenon discharge lamp and a photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltage was 600 V was used for the fluorescent measurements. A 1.0 cm quartz cell was employed for the batch assays and a 120 L flow cell unit (Shimadzu Corporation, Analytical Instrument Division, Kyoto, Japan) for the flow measurements was used. LCAR derivatized with FMOC was analyzed operating the spectrofluorimeter in the timecourse mode (transient signals; λex: 266 nm; λem: 313 nm, slits: 5/5 nm). The FIA manifold consisted of a Rheodyne (Rohnert Park, CA) model-5020 six-port two-way rotary valve. Standard and sample solutions were pumped through the FIA system with two Gilson (Villiers, France) Minipuls 2 peristaltic pumps connected with 1.3 mm i.d. Tygon tubing (Middleton, WI, USA).
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.3 Stock solutions L-Car stock solutions 6.2x10-4 mol L-1 were prepared by dissolution of suitable amounts in
PT
ultrapure water. Similarly, 0.020 mol L-1 NaTDC solution was prepared by dissolution of
RI
the solid surfactant in ultrapure water. A 1.0 mol L-1 HCl solution was prepared by dilution
SC
of concentrated HCl with ultrapure water. 2.4 Derivatization procedure
NU
The following solutions were prepared for use in the derivatization procedure according to
MA
[24]: An aliquot of standard L- CAR 6.2x10-4 mol L-1 (50 µL) was mixed with 50 µL of carbonate buffer (50x10-3 mol L-1, pH 10.4) and 130 µL of FMOC (30x10-3mol L-1 in
D
acetonitrile), were allowed to react for 60 min at 50 °C. The reaction was stopped with 150
AC CE P
TE
µL acetate buffer (50 x10-3mol L-1, pH 4.2).
2.5 Samples preparation
Samples of dietary supplements, drink and injectable, were acquired in local shops and pharmacies. Different aliquots of dietary supplements were diluted in ultrapure water to achieve a final concentration similar to L- CAR standard solution and homogenized for 5 minutes using a magnetic stirrer. Then, the derivatization procedure was performed, and 100 µL of the resulting solution were diluted up to 5 mL with ultrapure water and ethanol (80:20). An aliquot (1 mL) of the final dilution was then added to 1.0 mL NaTDC (0.020 mol L-1), 300 µL of HCl (1.0 mol L-1) and made up to 10 mL final volume with ultrapure water.
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.6 On-line extraction and fluorescence detection The analytical procedure proposed is very simple and it could be realized by mean a unique
PT
peristaltic pump. However, with the aim of optimize as independent parameters Sample
RI
Flow Rate (SFR) and Eluent Flow Rate (EFR), the FI system was designed using two peristaltic pumps (see Fig. 2). Once prepared, the resulting coacervate containing the
SC
analyte was analyzed using an on-line phase separation/preconcentration system that
NU
included a packed mini column coupled to the flow cell of a spectrofluorimeter (Fig. 2). The L- CAR -FMOC derivate (S) prepared as just noted, were loaded on to the glass wool
MA
mini column (mC) that was connected between ports 1 and 4 of the six-port valve (V) in position a (loading). In this step, L- CAR -FMOC derivate coacervate contained was
D
retained while the aqueous phase was sent to waste. Simultaneously, the eluent phase (0.01
TE
mol L-1 HCl solution) flowed through the line E to the detector to record the baseline
AC CE P
fluorescence. Finally, the sample peristaltic pump (P1) was stopped, the valve V was switched to injection position (b), and L- CAR -FMOC derivate coacervate contained was eluted with 0.01 mol L-1 HCl solution, directly into the flow cell. The analytical signal was recorded as peak area which was proportional to the L- CAR concentration in the sample. Afterwards, valve was switched to load position and the sequence started again for the next sample.
3.
Results and discussion
3.1. Surfactant mediated extraction variables The main goal of this study was to find the best conditions for fast and quantitative extraction of L- CAR -FMOC derivate. Sodium taurodeoxycholate was evaluated as
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT coacervate agents in the concentration range of 1.0x10-3 to 4.0x10-3 mol L-1. The maximum extraction efficiency was found to be at 2.0x10-3 mol L-1, therefore this value was selected
PT
for further studies. Based on previous studies (results not shown here), several coacervate
RI
promoting agents were assayed in aqueous media [29]. Thus, variable concentrations of calcium chloride, potassium iodide, sodium chloride, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium
SC
bromide (HTAB), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and HCl were added to aqueous solutions
NU
of NaTDC containing L- CAR -FMOC, and solutions evaluated for signs of coacervate formation. The ranges of concentrations studied were 0 - 0.05 mol L-1 for calcium chloride,
MA
potassium iodide and HCl. While for SDS and HTAB the concentration range studied were 1.0x10-3 – 3.0x10-3 mol L-1 and 0 – 5.0x10-4 mol L-1; respectively. Conclusions about
D
efficiency of extraction and ease of phase separation were laid out through comparison of
TE
the analytical signal recorded after phase separation and fluorescence measurement. The
AC CE P
inference of this study indicated that better results, in terms of intensity fluorescent signals, were obtained using HCl as coacervate promoting agent.
3.2. On-line preconcentration/Phase separation The HCl concentration required for retention of the formed coacervate on the glass wool in the mC was re-optimized using on-line scheme, considering the maximum fluorescence signal and the adequate repeatability. The obtained results were in concordance with the batch studies. Some batch studies were conducted in order to determine the optimal concentrations of HCl required for retention of the formed coacervate on the glass wool into C (as gauged by its physical appearance) and for obtainment of the maximum L- CAR -FMOC fluorescence signal. The influence of HCl volume on the coacervate formation was evaluated in the 9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT range 0- 0.05 mol L-1. The best results were obtained with 2.0x10-3 mol L-1 of NaTDC and 0.03 mol-1 L-1 of HCl. All subsequent experiments were conducted using these conditions.
PT
Column design, packing material and packing conditions were also evaluated. The packings
RI
analyzed were: HPLC filter, glass wool, native multiwall carbon nanotubes derivatized with NaTDC and cyclodextrins. Results showed that the minicolumn filled with 25 mg of glass
SC
wool was sufficient for the quantitative retention of the NaTDC coacervate containing the
MA
3.3. Sample loading and elution variables
NU
L-Car- FMOC and for generating maximal and reproducible signals.
The variables influencing the performance of the FIA method were examined to determine
D
the conditions necessary for an optimal fluorescence signal. First, the influence of SFR on
TE
the sensitivity was evaluated between the range of 0.5 and 3.0 mL min-1. A signal decrease
AC CE P
was observed at sample flow rates above 2.0 mL min-1. Reasonable explanation to this observation is that analyte was retained partially due to insufficient contact time with the solid phase. Therefore, a SFR of 2.0 mL min-1 was selected as optimal. In second term, the eluent composition and elution flow rate were optimized. Different solvents, such as water, ethanol, acetonitrile, different acid buffer solutions, HCl aqueous solutions and mixtures of them were tested as eluents to achieve complete release of the analyte from the NaTDC coacervate with optimal analytical signal. Weak fluorescence signals (evaluated as peak area) were obtained when water, ethanol, acetonitrile, sodium acetate acetic acid buffer (pH 4.0); water: ethanol or water: acetonitrile mixtures were employed as the eluent solvent systems. However, satisfactory elutions were achieved when solutions of HCl were employed as eluent. Hence, HCl was selected as eluent and the effect of HCl concentration was optimized from 1.0x10-3 to 1.0 mol L-1. The optimal concentration considering the 10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT quantitative elution and adequate sensitivity for L- CAR -FMOC was found to be 1.0x10-2 mol L-1 of HCl. Moreover, the effect of EFR on the analytical response was studied at flow
PT
rates between 1.0 and 3.0 mL min-1. The results showed that the analytical signal increased
RI
with the EFR, but at flow rates greater than 3.0 mL min-1 large and undesirable backpressures touching off uncouple on the FI system occurred. Therefore, an elution flow rate
SC
of 2.5 mL min-1 was selected as optimal because it allowed reasonable analysis time and
NU
acceptable mini-column back pressure. Furthermore, considering the reported in previous works [30], the influence of the direction elution flow on the sensitivity and peak shape was
MA
studied. The best results were obtained when the elution was performed in a countercurrent
TE
3.4. Analytical performance
D
manner (Fig. 2).
AC CE P
The calibration plot of FIA fluorescence peak area vs. L- CAR - FMOC concentration was linear over the concentration range (limit of linearity, LoL) of 3.26x10-7– 2.60x10-6 mol L-1 L- CAR - FMOC (r2= 0.9932). The limits of detection (LoD) and quantification (LoQ) were calculated using the relation k (SD)/m where k= 3.3 for LoD and 10 for LoQ and SD represents the standard deviation from 15 replicate blank responses and m is the slope of the calibration curve [33]. The LoD and LoQ obtained values were 2.4x10-8 mol L-1 and 7.3x10-8 mol L-1, respectively. A comparison of the sensitivity of this method with other reported methods in the literature [8, 13, 20, 21, 23, 34] is presented in Table 1. The present method offers simplicity, robustness and high sample throughput (30 samples per hour, without consider the required time for L-CAR derivatization) compared to previously reported methodologies. In addition, the achieved analytical parameters were similar to the informed by other authors. 11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 3.5. Application to real samples The L- CAR extraction using NaTDC coupled to molecular fluorescence was first applied
PT
to the L- CAR quantification in dietary supplements commercialized in different
RI
pharmacies of San Luis city, Argentina. The Fig. 3 shows the transient responses obtained for the standards and a real sample analyzed using the recommended optimized procedure.
SC
As can be seen in the Table 2, the L- CAR found in two of the samples analyzed were
NU
according to the percent specified in the corresponding monograph [18]. On the other hand, the recovery obtained for L- CAR -FMOC in the dietary supplements
MA
(drink and injectable) spiked with standard solutions at three concentration levels (8.0x10-8, 1.63x10-7 and 2.44x10-7 mol L-1 of L- CAR -FMOC) were satisfactory (recoveries between
D
82 % and 103 % were obtained). These outcomes showed that no matrix interferences were
TE
detected at none of the analyzed samples. Moreover, the L- CAR found concentration was
AC CE P
statically in agreement with the labels of pharmaceutical formulations.
4. Conclusions
An on-line surfactant-mediated extraction method using the bile salt NaTDC, as the coacervate agent, with fluorimetric detection for determination of L- CAR in dietary supplements has been developed. The proposed method reported for the first time the use of bile salt taurodeoxycholate, surfactant of natural origin, as a clouding phenomenon promoter agent. The automation of the methodology was achieved by employing a scheme of flow injection analysis, obtaining a sample throughput of 30 samples per hour (without consider the required time for L-CAR derivatization). The developed method resulted to be simple, fast, reliable, and economic, showing low detection limits compatible with the 12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT concentration of this compound in complex matrix as pharmaceutical formulations. Moreover, the proposed methodology represents a viable alternative to the conventional
RI
PT
carnitine analysis methods, as well as being environmentally friendly.
SC
Acknowledgments
NU
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support received by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica, Project PICT- 2010- 189, Instituto de Química de San
MA
Luis (INQUISAL-CONICET), Project PIP 11220130100605 and Universidad Nacional de
AC CE P
TE
D
San Luis, Project PROICO 22/Q228 and 22/Q832.
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT References [1] F.M. Vaz, R.J.A. Wanders, Carnitine biosynthesis in mammals, Biochem J. 361 (2002)
PT
17–29.
RI
[2] C.J. Rebouche, Carnitine function and requirements during the life cycle, The FASEB
SC
Journal. 6 (1992) 3379-3386.
NU
[3] A. L. Carter, T.O. Abney, D.F. Lapp, Biosynthesis and metabolism of carnitine, J. Child Neurol. 10 (1995) S3–S7. S.E.
Reuter,
A.M.
Evans,
Carnitine
MA
[4]
and
Acylcarnitines
Pharmacokinetic,
D
Pharmacological and Clinical Aspects, Clin Pharmacokinet. 9 (2012) 553-572.
TE
[5] A. Steiber, J. Kerner, C.L. Hoppel, Carnitine: A nutritional biosynthetic, and functional
AC CE P
perspective, Mol Aspects Med. 25 (2004) 455- 473 [6] C. Vogt, S. Kiessig, Separation of D/L- carnitine enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A. 745 (1996) 53–60. [7] L. Sánchez-Hernández, C. García-Ruiz, A.L. Crego, M.L. Marina, Sensitive determination of D-carnitine as enantiomeric impurity of levo-carnitine in pharmaceutical formulations by capillary electrophoresis- tandem mass spectrometry, J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. Anal. 53 (2010) 1217–1223. [8] W. Pormsila, S. Krӓhenbühl, P.C. Hauser, Determination of carnitine in food and food supplements by capillary electrophoresis with contactless conductivity detection, Electrophoresis. 31 (2010) 2186–2191.
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [9] J. Demarquoy, W. Georges, C. Rigault, M.C. Royer, A. Clairet, M. Soty, S. Lekounoungou, F. Le Borgne, Radioisotopic determination of L-carnitine content in foods
PT
commonly eaten in western countries, Food Chem. 86 (2004) 137–142.
RI
[10] V.A. Zammit, R.R. Ramsay, M. Bonomini, A. Arduini, Carnitine, mitochondrial
SC
function and therapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61 (2009) 1353–1362.
[11] M. Wang, R. Yang, J. Dong, T. Zhang, S. Wang, W. Zhou, H. Li, H. Zhao, L. Zhang,
NU
S. Wang, C. Zhang, W. Chen, Simultaneous quantification of cardiovascular disease related
MA
metabolic risk factors using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in human serum, J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 15 (2016) 144-151.
D
[12] M. Dabrowska, M. Starek, Analytical approaches to determination of carnitine in
TE
biological materials, foods and dietary supplements, Food Chem.142 (2014) 220-232.
AC CE P
[13] V. Prokoratová, F. Kvasnicka, R. Sevcik, M. Voldrich, Capillary electrophoresis determination of carnitine in food supplements, J. Chromatogr. A. 1081 (2005) 60-65. [14] L. Sánchez-Hernández, C. García-Ruiz, A.L. Crego, M.L. Marina, Development of a CE- MS2 method for the enantiomeric separation of L/D- carnitine: Application to the analysis of infant formulas, Electrophoresis. 30 (2009) 337- 348. [15] Y.X. Sun, C.X. Lu, Q.L. Tang, Y. Cao, Y.Z. Xue, X.X. Wan, et al, Simultaneus analysis of L-carnitine, acetyl-L-carnitine and propionyl-L-carnitine in human plasma by HPLC, Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal. 42 (2007) 1425-1428. [16] S. Freimüller and H. Altorfer, A chiral HPLC method for the determination of low amounts of D-carnitine and L-carnitine after derivatization with (+)- FLEC, Journal of pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis. 30 (2002) 209-218. 15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [17] A. Longo, G. Bruno, S. Curti, A. Mancinelli and G. Miotto, Determination of Lcarnitine, acetyl- L- carnitine and propionyl- L- carnitine in human plasma by highliquid
chromatography
after
pre-
column
derivatization
with
1-
PT
performance
RI
aminoantrhacene, Journal of chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and applications. 686
SC
(1996) 129-139.
[18] Pharmacopoeia of the United States Pharmacopeial Convention United States, twenty-
NU
fourth ed., 2000.
MA
[19] European Pharmacopoeia Convention of the European Pharmacopoeia, third ed., 1997. [20] M. Cuarteto, S. Perez, M. S. García, J. A. Ortuño, Ion selective electrodes for the
D
determination of L- carnitine. Application in dissolution testing of a dietary supplement,
TE
Monatsh Chem. 145 (2014) 1879-1885.
AC CE P
[21] A. Kakou, N. C. Megoulas, M. A. Koupparis, Determination of L-carnitine in food supplement formulations using ion- pair chromatography with indirect conductimetric detection, J. Chromatogr. A. 1069 (2005) 209- 215. [22] D.W. Johnson, An acid hydrolysis method for quantification of plasma free and total carnitine by flow injection tandem mass spectrometry, Clin. Biochem. 43 (2010) 1362– 1367. [23] A. Manjón, J.M. Obón, J.L. Iborra, Determination of L-Carnitine by Flow Injection Analysis with NADH Fluorescence Detection, Anal. Biochem. 281 (2000) 176-181. [24] C. Vogt, A. Georgi, G. Werner, Enantiomeric Separation of D/L- Carnitine using HPLC and CZE after Derivatization, Chromatographya. 40 (1995) 287- 295.
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [25] Z.-L Fang, Z.-H. Zhu, S.-C. Zhang, S.-K. Xu, L. Guo, L.-J. Sun, On line separation and preconcentration in flow injection analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta. 214 (1988) 41-55.
PT
[26] K.E. Paleologos, D.L. Giokas, M.I. Karayannis, Micelle-mediated separation and
RI
cloud-point extraction, Trends Anal. Chem. 24 (2005) 426-436.
SC
[27] W.L. Hinze, Bile Acid/Salts Surfactant Systems, Second Ed., Stamford, Connecticut,
NU
2000.
[28] R. A. Gil, J. A. Salonia, J. A. Gásquez, A. C. Olivieri, R. Olsina, L. D. Martinez, Flow
MA
injection system for the on- line preconcentration of Pb by cloud point extraction coupled to USN- ICP OES, Microchemical Journal. 95 (2010) 306- 310.
TE
D
[29] M. Falkova, M. Alexovič, M. Pushina, A. Bulatov, L. Moskvin, V. Andruch, Fully automated on-line flow-batch based ultrasound-assisted surfactant-mediated extraction and
AC CE P
determination of anthraquinones in medicinal plants, Microchem. J. 116 (2014) 98-106. [30] G. Acosta, M.C. Talio, M.O. Luconi, W.L. Hinze, L.P. Fernandez, Fluorescence method using on- line sodium cholate surfactant mediated extraction for the flow injection analysis of Rhodamine B, Talanta. 129 (2014) 516- 522. [31] R.O. Cole, M.J. Sepaniak, W.L. Hinze, J. Gorse, K. Oldiges, Bile salt surfactants in micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography. Application to hydrophobic molecule separation, Journal of Chromatography A. 20 (1991) 113- 123. [32] Kabir-ud-Din, M.A. Rub, A.Z. Naqui, Aqueous amphiphilic drug (amitriptyline hydrochloride)- bile salt mixtures at different temperatures, Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces. 84 (2011) 285- 291.
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT [33] L.A.Currie, Recommendations in Evaluation of Analytical Methods including Detection and Quantification Capabilities, Pure Appl. Chem. 67 (1995) 1699-1723.
PT
[34] J.-H. Ahn, B.-M. Kwak, J.-M. Park, N.-K. Kim, J.-M. Kim, Rapid Determination of L-
RI
carnitine in Infant and Toddler Formulas by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
Spectrometry, Korean J. Food Sci. An. 34 (2014) 749-756.
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Figure Captions
PT
Figure 1: Chemical structures of L-Car derivatized with FMOC and sodium
RI
taurodeoxycholate (used as coacervate agent) under the experimental conditions employed.
SC
Figure 2: Schematic diagram of the on-line extraction approach mediated by NaTDC for
NU
L-Car determination, mC, minicolumn; PP, peristaltic pumps; V, load/injection valve: (a)
MA
loading position (b) inject position); D, spectrofluorimeter.
Figure 3: Transient signal (FIAgram) obtained under optimized conditions corresponding
D
to both L-Car standard calibration and sample signal. Standard solution of L-Car-FMOC:
TE
(a) 3.26x10-7 mol L-1; (b) 9.78 x10-7 mol L-1; (c) 1.30 x10-6 mol L-1; (d) 1.95 x10-6 mol
AC CE P
L-1; (e) 2.6 x10-6 mol L-1; (f) real sample (Albicar inyectable). [λex = 266 nm and λem = 313nm. Excitation and emission slit widths were 5 nm and 5 nm, respectively. Injection time: 40 s.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Figure 1
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Figure 2
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
Figure 3
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Table 1. Comparative study of the proposed method with others reported in the literature for the determination of L-carnitine in dietary
RI
supplements.
Figures of Merit
Capillary Electrophoresis with contact less
LoD: 2.6x10-9 mol L-1, LoQ: 7.9x10-9 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 4
conductivity detection
min, Recovery: 93.5± 5.7 – 102± 3.4 %
ITP-ITP
LoD: 3.1x10-6 mol L-1, LoQ: 1.2x10-5 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 25
Reference [8]
MA
NU
SC
Methodology
PT ED
min, Recovery: 91 – 113 %
LoD: 2.6x10-5 mol L-1, LoQ: 8.7x10-5 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 10 [13]
LoD: 2.7x10-5 mol L-1, LoQ: 9.11x10-5 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 10
AC
Direct CZE-UV
Ion Selective Electrodes
min, Recovery: 104- 106 %
CE
Indirect CZE-UV
min, Recovery: 96- 98%
LoD: 2.7x10-5 mol L-1 (DOS), 2.1x10-5 mol L-1 (TCP), 6.8x10-6 mol
[20]
L-1 (NPOE), Analysis Time: ˂ 5 seg. Ion Pair Chromatography with indirect
LoD: 1.7x10-5 mol L-1, Analysis Time:
conductimetric detection
˃5.4 min, Recovery: 97.7 – 99.7 %
[21]
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
LoD: 1.0x10-6 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 4.2 min.
LC-MS/MS
LOD: 3.1x10-10 mol L-1, LoQ: 1x10-9 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 20
[23] [34]
RI
PT
FIA with NADH Fluorescence Detection
SC
min, Recovery: 93.38 % LoD: 2.4x10-8 mol L-1, LoQ: 7.3x10-8 mol L-1, Analysis Time: 2
NaTDC coacervate coupled to Molecular
min, Recovery: 82 – 103 %
This work
NU
FIA method using extraction mediated by
AC
CE
PT ED
MA
Fluorescence
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Labeled concentration vs found concentration of L-CAR in dietary supplements
PT
(drink and injectable commercial presentation forms) analyzed by Flow Injection Analysis
Labeled L-CAR
Found L-CAR ± SD
Recovery (%)
1
1g/10 mL
0.97± 0.02 g/10 mL
97
2
250 mg/7.5 g
271±3.79 mg/ 7.5 g
108
3
1g/5 mL
0.84±0.04 g/5mL
84
SC
NU MA
coupled to Molecular Fluorescence
RI
Sample*
1- Drink Albicar™ (10 µL/ 10 mL), composition: sodium cyclamate, hydrochloric acid, potassium
D
*
TE
sorbate, cetrimide, ethanol, orange flavor, sodium saccharin and distilled water, 2- Drink
AC CE P
Omnilife™ (7,2 mL/100 mL), composition: sweetener, green coffee extract, black tea, inuline, LTyrosine and preservatives, 3-Injectable Albicar™ (5 µL/10 mL), composition: hydrochloric acid and distilled water sterile .
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights Novel method has been developed for L-Carnitine fluorescent quantification.
On line sodium taurodeoxycholate coacervate mediated extraction has been applied.
It constitutes an alternative strategy to L- Carnitine conventional analysis.
It is a green method considering the low volume consumption of reagents.
AC CE P
TE
D
MA
NU
SC
RI
PT
26