Chemosphere,Vol.10, No.4, pp 441 - 443, 1981 Printed in Great Britain
0045-6535/81/040441-03~02.00/0 ©1981 Pergamon Press Ltd.
NEW METHOD FOR BIS(METHYLMERCURIC) CHLORIDE,
SELENIDE
SYNTHESIS
SODIUM SELENITE AND REDUCED GLUTATHIONE
Akira Naganuma and Nobumasa Department
of Public Health,
Kitasato
FROM METHYLMERCURIC
University,
Imura*
School of Pharmaceutical
9-1 Shirokane
Sciences
5 chome, Minato-ku
Tokyo 108, Japan
ABSTRACT Bis(methylmercuric)
selenide
reaction of methylmercuric reduced glutathione and useful
[BMS,
chloride
or cysteine
(CH3Hg) 2Se] was obtained by the
and sodium selenite
in a reasonable
yield.
in the presence The reaction
of
is simple
for BMS synthesis.
INTRODUCTION Formation of bis(methylmercuric) mercury
and selenite
selenide
[BMS,
(CH3Hg) 2Se]
in animal tissues has been observed
(1,2).
from methylThe BMS
formation may take a role in modifying effect of selenium on methylmercury toxicity
(3,4,5).
from reaction
Breitinger
and Morel1
(6) reported that BMS was obtained
of H2Se with CH3HgBr in methanol
here a new simple method
for BMS synthesis
under nitrogen.
We describe
using reduced glutathione
(GSH)
and
Na2SeO 3 instead of H2Se.
MATERIALS Eight millimoles
AND METHODS
of GSH was dissolved
in i00 ml of distilled water and
pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. to the GSH solution
and dissolved
completely.
441
CH3HgCl
(i nm~ole) was added
To the solution was added
442
0.4 m m o l e of N a 2 S e O 3 and the m i x t u r e was shaken v i g o r o u s l y for a few minutes. The m i x t u r e was e x t r a c t e d w i t h 100 ml of b e n z e n e w a s h e d once w i t h 100 ml of 0.5% GSH s o l u t i o n w i t h 100 ml of d i s t i l l e d water. reduced pressure
Then,
to a b o u t 10 ml.
appeared.
The r e s i d u a l
(pH 7.4),
layer was
and further w a s h e d twice
the b e n z e n e was e v a p o r a t e d at 50°C under
To the r e s i d u a l b e n z e n e was added 15 ml of
ethanol and e v a p o r a t i o n was c o n t i n u e d
were r e c r y s t a l l i z e d
and the b e n z e n e
until
a trace of s i l v e r c r y s t a l s
s o l u t i o n was c o o l e d and silvery f l a k e - l i k e c r y s t a l s
from e t h a n o l
(under 60°C),
M a s s s p e c t r a were taken w i t h a J M S - D I 0 0
collected,
and d r i e d in vacuo.
s p e c t r o m e t e r using a d i r e c t inlet
system at 20 eV.
RESULTS A N D D I S C U S S I O N The r e a c t i o n of m e t h y l m e r c u r i c (0.4 mmole)
in the p r e s e n c e of GSH
chloride (8 mmoles)
p r o d u c t was i d e n t i f i e d as BMS by mp. (Calcd.
for C2H6Hg2Se:
C, 4.72%;
H, 1.29%;
G a n t h e r et al.,
Hg,
C, 4.70%; 79.46%;
(i mmole)
gave 134 mg of crystals.
(130°C, d e c o m p o s e d ) ,
H, 1.18%; Hg, Se,
15.60%)
78.64%;
On this m e t h o d for BMS
and Morell
(i), it s h o u l d be stored at -20°C.
(A)
.o
5~
109
o
.'_c 10(
4) cc
Since BMS is
(6) r e p o r t e d that the y i e l d of BMS by tile r e a c t i o n
10(
®
the
s e l e n i u m does not react w i t h
O p t i m u m pH of this r e a c t i o n was about 7.4.
at room t e m p e r a t u r e
Breitinger
Found: (Fig. i).
c h l o r i d e have to be added to GSH s o l u t i o n b e f o r e
a d d i t i o n of N a 2 S e O 3, b e c a u s e i n s o l u b l e e l e m e n t a l
unstable
Se, 15.48%.
The
analysis
(7) r e p o r t e d that N a 2 S e O 3 r e a c t e d w i t h GSH and the r e a c t i o n
methylmercuric
methylmercury.
elemental
and mass s p e c t r o m e t r y
gave i n s o l u b l e e l e m e n t a l s e l e n i u m as a final product. synthesis,
and s o d i u m selenite
(S)
201
,I
295
4iS
l,, I,
510
295
-"
,I
~
~
II.
~
I,
~
T
.~"
m/e
Fig. i. Mass spectra of BMS (A) and the product by the reaction of methylmercury and sodium selenite in the presence of GSH (B). BMS was synthesized by the method of Breitinger and Morell (6).
443
of CH3HgBr and H2Se was about 30%.
The present method using GSH and Na2SeO 3
instead of H2Se gave BMS in a higher yeild (about 66% from Na2SeO 3 used, after recrystallization)
than that of Breitinger and Morell
(6).
Cysteine was proved to be able to substitute for GSH in this reaction, giving BMS in a yeild of 62% and appeared to be preferable starting material because of its low price.
Together with the relatively high yield the sim-
plicity of the procedure seems to make this new synthetic method quite useful.
REFERENCES i.
Naganuma, A. and Imura, N.,
2.
Naganuma, A., Kojima, Y. and Imura, N., Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharma-
3.
Ganther, H. E., Gondie, C., Sunde, M. L., Kopecky, M. J., Wanger, P. A.,
163,
Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol.,
(1980).
col.,
30, 301,
(1980).
Oh, S. E. and Hoekstra, W. G., Science, 4.
Iwata, H., Okamoto, H. and Ohsawa, Y., col.,
5.
5, 673,
175, 1122,
Res. Commun. Chem. Patho. Pharma-
Ohi, G., Nishigaki, S., Seki, H., Tamura, Y., Maki, T., Konno, H., Ochiai, 12, 49,
I. and Yague, H.,
Environ.
Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Letters,
10, 409,
(1976).
Breitinger,
D. and Morell, W.,
(1974). 7.
(1972).
(1973).
S., Yamada, H., Shimamura, Y., Mizoguchi, 6.
27,
Ganther, H. E.,
(Received in
Biochemistry,
Japan 24March 1901)
~, 2898,
(1968).
Res.,