June 1994
EDITORIALS
rameters committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:836-843. Rickert RR, Auerbach 0, Garfinkel L, Hammond EC, Frasca JM. Adenomatous lesions of the large bowel: an autopsy survey. Cancer i979;43:1847-1857. DiSario JA. Foutch PG, Mai HD. Pardy K, Manne RK. Prevalence of malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 1991;86:941-945. Surveillance, epidemiology and end-results: incidence and mortality data, 1973-77. NCI Monogr, No. 57. Morson B. The polypcancer sequence in the large bowel. Proc Roy Sot Med 1974;67:451-457. O’Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, Dickersin GR, Ewing S, Geller S, Kasimian D, Komorowski R, Szporn. and the National Polyp Study Workgroup. The national polyp study: patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology i990;98:37i-379. Knoernschild HE. Growth rate and malignant potential of colonic polyps: early results. Surg Forum 1963; 14:137-138. Kozuka S, Nogaki M, Ozeki T, Masumori S. Premalignancy of the
16.
17.
la. 19. 20.
21. 22.
mucosal polyp in the large intestine. II. Estimation of the periods required for malignant transformation of mucosal polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 1975; l&494-500. Spencer RJ, Melton Ill IJ, Ready RL, llstrup DM. Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population-based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59:305-310. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Risk of colorectal cancer up to 30 years after adenoma-removal. New Engl J Med 1992; 326:658-662. Lieberman D. Prospective evaluation of risk factors for large (sl cm) colonic adenomas in asymptomatic subjects. VA Cooperative Studies Program (manuscript in preparation). Lilienfeld AM, Lilienfeld DE. Foundations of epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford, 1980:217-218.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Address requests for reprints to: Joe V. Selby, M.D., M.P.H., Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, 3451 Piedmont Avenue, Oakland, California 94611. Fax: (510) 450-2071. 0 1994 by the American Gastroenterological Association 0016=5085/94/53.00
New Paradigms for the Pathophysiology
S
tudies of the pathophysiology parallel
of infectious
those of other diarrhea1 diseases.
diarrhea New con-
of Infectious
Diarrhea
diarrhea and began to pursue studies of the mechanisms of intestinal
secretion
in enterotoxigenic
cepts come about when there is a critical mass of informa-
as cholera and Escherichia coli heat-stable
tion and a paradigm
fection.
A major paradigm diminishing
on which to frame the new findings. shift came about in the mid-1960s
changes in motility
in water and electrolyte ical cause of diarrhea. on cholera,
and toxin production
cal damage,‘.*
and on salmonellosis,
characterized
by changes
intestinal
secretion
cause of diarrhea. established
intestinal
both
Soon after the initial
became well
for the diarrhea
secretory phenomenon
of this infection.‘-a
failed to progress
basic paradigm
to explain
secretion
secretion,
nucleotides) secretory
most investigators. others,
stopped
concepts
However,
this
and no one clearly
knew
Further-
of a purified cholera toxin
of the concept as a mechanism mechanisms
to couple toxins
proved too powerful
Both Giannella
our investigation
of second messengers to for
embodied
plain how intestinal vation.‘-‘* formed
lating
inflammatory
mediators
such
leukotrienes,
oxygen
intestinal
the enterocyte
reduce the intestinal
peroxide)
both by directly stimu-
and acting
on enteric intestinal
mechanism
that might
infection
by
and muscle
and I, as well as many
by cross-linking lin G receptors
These
and reinfection
changes
in
function.
These
of immunoglobulin
intestinal
bra-
investigators
worms causes a mild inflammatory
accompanied
serve to
caused by N$postrongyltls
showed that both initial
transport
and
anaphy-
burden of nematodes during parasite spiralis.
tis
Baird et al.,”
of intestinal
Trichinella
these complex
nerves to secretion.
the concept
such as those and
mediators
species (hydrogen
secretion
laxis as a host defense infections
histamine, activating
Castro et a1.,13 Perdue and Gall,‘”
siliensis
as
platelet
induce neurotransmitter-mediated developed
acti-
it became clear that pre-
or adenosine and newly synthesized
and reactive
others”-‘*
transport.
secretion ensued after leukocyte
From these studies,
of invasive
infectious
new light on how inflamma-
were more than adequate to ex-
such as prostaglandins, factor,
in-
in this new field of intestinal
neuroimmunophysiology
role in the
because there was no
which cells in the gut produced prostaglandins. and the excitement
in
how white blood cells might
more, the lure and availability
intestinal
accompa-
et al. showed that prostaglan-
line of research intestinal
The
such
came on the
tion and white blood cells may alter electrolyte
could initiate
reports of intestinal
Giannella
scene that shed an entirely
serotonin,
pathophysiological
secretion
dins and white blood cells play an important
(cyclic
showed
infection.
salmonellosis,3-5
induce
by lumi-
with no histologi-
in histology,3-5
as the paradigm
nying intestinal
when research
an invasive enteritis
to be the major Thus,
changes
diarrhea characterized
diarrheas enterotoxin
Less than 5 years ago, a new paradigm
as the major physiolog-
This shift occurred
an infectious
nal colonization
and promoting
transport
1705
with enteri-
electrolyte
events are caused
E or immunoglobu-
on the mast cells with a resulting
explo-
1706
GASTROENTEROLOGY
EDITORIALS
sive release of mast cell inflammatory process
was not unlike
airway in allergic rhinitis an initial anaphylactic inflammation. secretion
mediators.
that experienced
This
in the upper
and asthma in which there was
response followed by conventional
In the gut, these processes cause intestinal
and intestinal
smooth
washed out and physically the intestine.
the nematodes
nellosis
is released
It is entirely possi-
ble that this could be the initiating
event in infectious
diarrheas of many types.
In summary,
the paradigm
intestinal
from phago-
secretion
by acting
enteric
laboratory
on
have clearly
et al.
shown
also involves
that white
cruit
new phagocytes
fecting tode,
to the lamina
microorganism then
mast
is a complex
cell
activation
have shown
the diarrhea on reinfection.
that E. co/i 0157:H7
these investigators
infection
ulated by pretreating
modanti-
then phagocyte
Such
pathophysiological
bodies against CD18
leukocyte
the influx of white blood cells into
adhesion molecules.
the lamina propria of the gut with resulting tion and also diminish
epithelial
inflamma-
damage and the intesti-
neutrophils
activation
studies of Clostridium dif$cicileinfection
suggest
a similar
cells and phagocytes
type of pathophysiological
process’s””
The toxins elabo-
rated by these organisms
appear to act at least in part
the activation
Are there other forms of invasive infectious
diarrhea
scheme?
Probably
and white blood cells are clearly im-
portant determinants
of intestinal
models
secretion
of protozoan
and diarrhea
infection
such as
amebiasis”
and cryptosporidiosis.2’.22
Furthermore,
lymphocyte
activation
system
recently
and crypt hyperplasia, intestinal nellosis,
of the immune
shown as a fundamental infections shigellosis,
MacDonald
of various types,
and Spencer
lymphocytes
have shown
induce stem cell division is quite
the opposite
proposed in which microorganism epithelial
cells was thought
seen in small
including
and rotavirus
plasia, which drives the development This paradigm
has been
cause of villus atrophy
which is commonly
protozoan,
T-
salmo-
infections.
that activated
T
and crypt hyperof villus atrophy.23 of that previously
invasion and death of
to drive the reactive hyper-
plasia of the crypts. Lastly, suggested
recent
studies
or luminal
mediators
what may be the initiating
have
event in the in-
is
to form a crypt
released
from
chloride
mast
and water
sodium
and
This occurs by direct effects of these
propria
release of prostaglandins
mesenchymal
cells,
and mediator
of the enteric nervous system.‘o31’ Other cyto-
kines released by the epithelium pria white
blood
or activated lamina pro-
cells may also induce
crypt cell division and hyperplasia
the process
of
in the small intestine,
an event that results in villus atrophy. This adds a component of malabsorption and deranging
to the diarrhea
surface absorptive
placing normal absorption If proteases sufficient phagocytes, epithelium cent
and reactive
quantity then
enteropathy
in the small intestine in epithelial
mast
damage
in
cells
and
to both
the
could also ensue in an “innoresulting
in erosions,
in vascular permeability and bleeding.
ulcer-
with pro-
Crypt hyperplasia
is a reparative process. Also, develcell lineage may take part
repair after ulceration
A word of warning.
cells and re-
species are released
extensive
process,
ations, and alterations
epithelial
the activated
and vasculature
bystander”
tein-losing
oxygen
from fairly
by diminishing
cells with secreting crypt cells.
opment of the ulcer-associated from several laboratories
substance
microorganisms
of neutral
on the epithelium,
activation
is
in the lumen of the bowel,
cause intestinal
chloride absorption. from lamina
organism
or perhaps even protozoa,
as well as inhibition
mediators
of white blood cells.
that share such a pathophysiological
secretion
Inflammatory
and
role in
is likely to be the major early
concentrated
abscess.27
investigators
be induced
would cross the epithelium
out that
These
may
process. If the chemotactic
point
event.
If the in-
one, such as a nema-
If the offending
released by the epithelium also sufficiently
propria.
from
and re-
would play an important
a simple one, such as bacteria
could be extensively
the animals with monoclonal
antibodies
diminish
anaphylaxis
if
and/or epi-
that activate resident phagocytes
but elegant
experiment,
adherence,
many,
thelial invasion, there may be a release of cytokines
intestinal
in experimental
model for host-
that may explain
diarrhea. After initial colonization, the epithelium
nerves.
Elliott
interactions
a generic
not most, of the adherent and invasive forms of infectious
E. coli infection
so. Prostaglandins
of neuroimmunophysiol-
ogy allows us now to postulate
In a simple
through
is a potent
molecule for neutrophils.
blood cells in its disease pathophysiology.”
nal secretory
from the intestinal
and this cytokine
microoreanism
but also by activating
O’Loughlin’s
that
during infection,
8 is
but that there was a neural
In this issue of GASTROENTEROLOGY, from
one such cytokine
on either invaInterleukin
as was the case with mast
cytes not only induced
enterohemorrhagic
were in-
Ar-
Thus,
diarrhea, release of mediators
the enterocyte
by microorganisms.
chemotactic
of salmo-
et al.,”
secretion
as well.”
cell-mediated
studies
not only that prostaglandins
volved in intestinal component
further
Eckmann
are released from the intestine
inflammatory
the same time,
invasion.
sion or colonization
from
The enteric nervous system was also shown
showed
cytokines
epithelium
to have a role in this process. At about
of bacterial
No. 6
nold et al.,“’ and Crowe et a1.26 have shown that various
that
muscle contraction
expelled
flammation
Vol. 106,
Although
of the intestine.” the pathophysiological
June 1994
EDITORIALS
scheme described
above may show several specific points
in which pharmacological intervention could be directed toward infectious diarrhea1 diseases, it should be remembered that this inflammatory defense response.
response
is basically
a host
Teleologically,
it is designed
to rid the
body of invasive microorganisms
and unwanted
antigens.
Although invasion mental
diarrhea
may be severe and harmful,
and septicemia
may be ultimately
systemic
W.
15.
16.
more detri-
to the host, i.e., it may be fatal. DON
14.
17.
POWELL
Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, Texas
18.
References
19.
1. Field M, Fromm D, Al-Awqati Q, Greenough WB. Effect of cholera
2. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. 10.
11.
12.
13.
enterotoxin on ion transport across isolated ileal mucosa. J Clin Invest 1972; 51:796-804. Field M. Ion transport in rabbit eleal mucosa. Il. Effects of cyclic 3’,5’-AMP. Am J Physiol 1971;221:992-997. Powell DW, Plotkin GR, Maenza RM, Solberg LI, Catlin DH, Formal SB. Experimental diarrhea. I. Intestinal water and electrolyte transport in rat salmonella enterocolitis. Gastroenterology 1971;60:1053-1064. Powell DW, Plotkin GR, Solberg LI, Catlin DH, Maenza RM, Formal SB. Experimental diarrhea. II. Glucose-stimulated sodium and water transport in rat salmonella enterocolitis. Gastroenterology 1971;60:1064-1075. Powell DW, Solberg LI, Plotkin GR, Catlin DH, Maenza RM, Formal SB. Experimental diarrhea. Ill. Bicarbonate transport in rat salmonella enterocolitis. Gastroenterology 1971;60:1076-1086. Giannella RA, Gots RE, Charney AN, Greenough WB, Formal SB. Pathogenesis of salmonella-mediated intestinal fluid secretion. Gastroenterology 1975;69:1238-1245. Giannella RA, Rout WR. Formal SB. Effect of indomethacin on intestinal water transport in salmonella-infected rhesus monkeys. Infect Immun. 1977;17:136-139. Giannella RA. Importance of the intestinal inflammatory reaction in salmonella-mediated intestinal secretion. Infect lmmun 1979; 23:140-145. Castro GA. Immunological regulation of epithelial function. Am J Physiol 1982; 243:G321-G329. Powell DW. lmmunophysiology of intestinal electrolyte transport. In: Frizzell RA, ed. Handbook of physiology: the gastrointestinal system. Rockville, MD: American Physiological Society, 1991: 591-641. Stead RH, Perdue MH, Cooke H, Powell DW, Barrett KE, eds. Neuroimmunophysiology of the gastrointestinal mucosa: implications for inflammatory disease. Volume 664, Ann NY Acad Sci, 1992. Castro GA, Powell DW. The physiology of the mucosal immune system and immune-mediated responses in the gastrointestinal tract. In: Johnson LR, ed. Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. 3rd ed. New York: Raven, 1994 (in press). Castro GE, Harari Y, Russell D. Mediators of anaphylaxisinduced
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
1707
ion transport changes in small intestine. Am J Physiol 1987;253:G540-G548. Perdue MH, Gall DG. Intestinal anaphylaxis in the rat: jejunal responses to in vitro antigen exposure. Am J Physiol 1986; 250:G427-G431. Baird AW, Cuthbert AW, Pearce FL. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions in epithelia from rats infected with Nippostrongyk~s brasilienses. Br J Pharmacol 1985;85:787-795. Brunsson I. Enteric nerves mediate the fluid secretory response due to salmonella typhmuriumR5 infection in the rat small intestine. Acta Physiol Stand 1987;131:609-617. Elliott E. Li Z, Bell C, Stiel D, Buret A, Wallace J, Brzuszczak I, O’Loughlin E. Modulation of host response to Escherichia Co/i 0157:H7 infection by anti-CD18 antibody in rabbits. Gastroenterology 1994; 106:1554-1561. Triadafilopoulos G, Pothoulakis C, O’Brien MJ, LaMont JT. Differential effect of Clostridium difficiletoxins A and B on rabbit ileum. Gastroenterology 1987;93:273-279. Triadafilopoulos G, Pothoulakis C, Weiss R, Giampaolo C, LaMont JT. Comparative study of Clostridium difkile toxin A and cholera toxin in rabbit ileum. Gastroenterology 1989;97:1186-1192. McGowan K, Piver G, Stoff JS, Donowitz M. Role of prostaglandins and calcium in the effects of Entamoeba histolytica on colonic electrolyte transport. Gastroenterology 1990;98:873-880. Argenzio RA, Liacos JA, Levy ML, Meuten DJ, Lecce JG, Powell DW. Villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia, cellular infiltration and impaired glucoseNa absorption in enteric cryptosporidiosis of pigs. Gastroenterology 1990;98:1129-1140. Argenzio RA, Lecce J, Powell DW. Prostanoids inhibit intestinal NaCl absorption in experimental porcine cryptosporidiosis. Gastroenterology 1993; 104:440-447. MacDonald TT, Spencer J. Evidence that activated mucosal T cells play a role in the pathogenesis of enteropathy in human small intestine. J Exp Med 1988;167:1341-1349. Eckmann L, Kagnoff MF, Fierer J. Epithelial cells secrete the chemokine interleukin8 in response to bacterial entry. Infect lmmun 1993; 61:4569-4574. Arnold JW, Niesel DW, Annable CR, Hess CB, Asuncion M, Cho YJ, Peterson JW, Klimpel GR. Tumor necrosis factor-o mediates the early pathology in Salmonella infection of the gastrointestinal tract. Microb Pathog 1993;14:217-227. Crowe SE, Dytoc M, Hunt RH, Muller M, Sherman PM, Pate1 J, Jin Y, Ernst PB. Expression of interleukin8 and ICAM- by human gastric epithelium following Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro. Gastroenterology (in press). Parkos CA, Delp C, Arnout MA, Madara JL. Neutrophil migration across a cultured intestinal epithelium. J Clin Invest 1991;88: 1605-1612. Wright NA, Pike C, Elia G. Induction of a novel epidermal growth factor-secreting cell lineage by mucosal ulceration in gastrointestinal stem cells. Nature 1990:343;82-85.
Address requests for reprints to: Don W. Powell, M.D., Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 Unlversity Boulevard, 4.108 John Sealy Hospital, Galveston, Texas 775100567. Fax: (409) 772-3394. 0 1994 by the American Gastroenterological Association 00165085/94/$3.00