J. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 9 (4) 1976 321-327
New Q Waves After Bypass Grafting: Correlations Between Graft Patency, Ventriculogram and Surgical Venting Technique BY AGOP AINTABLIAN, M.D., ROBERT I. HAMBY, M.D., IRWIN HOFFMAN, M.D., MARVIN L. HARTSTEIN, M.D. AND B. GEORGE WISOFF, M.D.
SUMMARY
varied. They include ventricular trauma and conduction delays resulting from surgery or venting, as well as infarction. This may be due to compromised arterial inflow either in nonoperated vessels or in the vessels distal to the anastomosis with patent grafts, or due to occluded grafts.
New Q waves were observed in 35 (11%) of 321 patients u n d e r g o i n g s a p h e n o u s vein bypass grafting with an overall mortality rate of 1.1%. Twenty-eight (80%) had postoperative arteriograms and ventriculograms and are reported. Ventricular venting was used intra-operatively in 17 patients and atrial venting in 11. The incidence of new Q wave was 22% in patients with ventricular venting and 5.5% in those with atrial venting (p<0.05). Complete or i n c o m p l e t e revascularization did not affect the incidence of new Q waves. New Q waves appeared in a zone of myocardium supplied by a grafted artery in all except two patients with ventricular venting in w h o m Q waves occurred within the zone of myocardium supplied by diseased ungrafted vessels. In the ventricular venting group, seven (41%) d e m o n s t r a t e d an improved or unchanged postoperative ventriculogram and ten (59%) had deteriorated ventriculograms. In 11 patients with atrial venting, nine (82%) s h o w e d i m p r o v e d or u n c h a n g e d p o s t operative ventriculograms and two (18%) had deteriorated ventriculograms. Ventricular venting patients with improved or unchanged postoperative ventriculograms had 7% graft closure as compared to 5% of those with atrial venting (pNS). Graft closure rate was 44% in ventricular venting and 20% (pNS) of patients with atrial venting who had deteriorated left ventriculograms. These findings indicate poor correlation between new Q waves and graft closure. Improved postoperative ventriculograms correlated well with graft patency despite new Q waves. The etiology of new post bypass graft Q waves are
New postoperative electrocardiographic Q waves have been described in 8 to 40% of patients undergoing bypass grafting for coronary a r t e r y disease. 1-5 Various theories have been p r o p o s e d , i n c l u d i n g g r a f t c l o s u r e , 6 int raoperat i ve myocardial t r a u m a v,s and even improved myocardial function in a ventricular segment opposite to a previously electrocardiographically "silent" infarct. 9 We report h e r e i n our experience with posto p e r a t i v e Q w a v e s in p a t i e n t s w i t h v e i n grafts and the relationship of new Q waves to v e n t r i c u l a r venting, graft patency and vent ri cul ar function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS Between December 1970 and January 1973, 350 patients underwent coronary bypass surgery. Twenty-nine patients were excluded because they also underwent partial ventricular resection or prosthetic valve replacement, together with aortocoronary bypass surgery. In the remaining 321, 35 patients developed new Q waves, making up the case material for the present study. All patients had preoperative left and right heart catheterization and left ventricular and coronary angiography using the Sones or Judkin's technique. Post-bypass recatheterization and angiography were done 10-15 days after operation, just before hospital discharge, in order to assess the patency of the grafts, as well as any change in left ventricular function as previously described (10,11). All angiograms and electrocardiograms (EKGs) were reviewed by two different cardiologists in order to compare pre- and postoperative studies. Electrocardiographic criteria for selection were limited to significant new Q waves. The Q wave criteria used to evaluate the EKG was essentially class 1-1 and 1-2 of the Minnesota code reported by Blackburn and associates (12). Cases presenting t r a n s i e n t ST segment or T wave changes without pathologic Q waves were excluded from this study. Eighty of 321 patients were operated upon for preinfarction angina, while 241 had elective surgery for angina. The patients were di-
From the Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, and the Department of Surgery, Cardiovascular Division, Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York; Queens Hospital Center Affiliation, Jamaica, New York; and The School of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York. Reprint requests to: Agop Aintablian, M.D., Cardiology Division, Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11040. 321
322
A I N T A B L I A N ET AL
vided into groups according to the technique used to vent the left ventricle during surgery. In patients with ventricular venting, the vent was inserted via the apex into the left ventricular chamber, whereas in patients with atrial venting, the vent was inserted into the left ventricle via one of the pulmonary veins. Group A comprised 104 patients with left ventricular venting and Group B comprised 217 patients with left atrial venting. Twenty-three new Q waves occurred in Group A and 12 in Group B. Of these 35 patients with new Q waves, 30 were men and 5 were women. The ages ranged from 36 to 67 years. Patients who had saphenous vein bypasses to all coronary arteries with luminal narrowing greater than 50% were considered complete revascularizations. Patients in whom saphenous vein bypass could not be performed to one or more vessels with luminal narrowing of greater than 50% were considered incomplete revascularizations.
RESULTS 1. Effects of Surgical Venting Technique Of 321 patients operated on, 104 (Group A, Table 1) had in tr a oper a t i ve v e n t r i c u l a r venting, while 217 (Group B, Table 2) had atrial v e n t in g during surgery. The incidence of new Q waves in Group A was 23/104 (22%) and in Group B, 12/217 (5.5%).
tients, 35 (11%) had new p o s t o p e r a t i v e Q waves. Of these, 8 (6.3%) occurred after single bypass in 127 patients, 20 (14%) after double bypass in 142 patients, and 7 (13.5%) after triple bypass in 52 patients. Complete revascularization was performed in 50/104 (48%) of p a t i e n t s with v e n t r i c u l a r vent i ng and 142/217 (65%) of patients with atrial venting. P a t i e n t s with new Q waves in group A had 13/23 (57%) com pl et e revasc u l a r i z a t i o n and in those of group B 6/12 (50%).
3. Relation of New Q Waves to Ungrafted Vessels or to Patent Grafts with Occluded Distal Artery New Q waves appeared in the zone of myocardium supplied by grafted arteries in all patients except two with v e n t r i c u l a r v e n t i n g (Case No. 6,7) in whom Q waves occurred within the zone of m y o c a r d i u m supplied by diseased, u n g r a f t e d vessels. Of all t h e patients with new Q waves who were restudied, only one, (Case 27), with atrial vent i ng and d e t e r i o r a t e d left v e n t r i c u l o g r a m , d e m o n strated p a t e n t grafts and an occluded coronary a r t e r y beyond the distal anastomotic site of t he graft.
2. Relation of New Q Waves to Number of Grafts Placed
4. Relation of New Q Waves to Postoperative Alteration of Left Ventricular Function and Graft Closure
In th e e n t i r e series of 321 o p e r a t e d pa-
In t h e 23 v e n t r i c u l a r v e n t e d p a t i e n t s TABLE I
Correlation of Number of Grafts, Patency Rate and New Q Waves in Patientswith Left Ventricular Venting Number
Post-Op Study
Grafts Closed
New Q Waves
No.
%
No.
No.
%
No.
%
23
22
3
3
%
Died
Patients
104
86
83
Grafts
157
122
78
27
22
LAD
82
67
82
6
9
RCA
50
40
80
15
38
CX
25
17
68
2
12
Single
51
40
78
15
38
6
1
Double
49
37
76
11G*
15
15
2
4
2
50
RCAt
17
2
0
Triple Abbreviations: LAD RCA CX tRCA "11G
= = = = =
Left anterior descending coronary artery Right coronary artery Circumflex coronary artery Only RCAgraft closure 11closed grafts in 8 patients (3 double and S single) J. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
NEW Q WAVES AFTER BYPASS GRAFTING
323
TABLE 2 Correlation of Number of Grafts, Patency Rate and New Q Waves in Patients with Left Atrial Venting Number
Post-Op Study
Grafts Closed
New Q Waves
No.
%
No.
No.
%
12
Patients
217
147
68
Grafts
406
265
65
18
7
LAD
192
134
70
7
5
RCA
117
78
67
6
8
CX
89
53
60
5
9
Single
76
60
79
4
7
Double
93
56
60
Triple
48
31
65
Died
%
No.
%
5.5
1
0.5
11G* 10 4Gt
4
Abbreviations: "11G = 11 closed grafts in 10 patients (1 double and 9 single) t 4G = 4 closed grafts in 4 patients ].
r[
TTT
OVR
QVL
OVF"
VI
V2
V3
V4
V5
V6
Fig. 1. Case 18 of Table 4. Serial EKGs, demonstrating inverted T waves in the anterior wall leads in the preoperative tracing (top) and less of R wave in leads V1-V2 in the two postoperative tracings. All saphenous vein bypass grafts were patent in this patient and postoperative left ventriculogram demonstrated improvement of left ventricular motion. (Group A) with new Q waves, 17 were studied postoperatively (Table 3). Five had single and 11 had double bypass grafts, while one had a triple bypass (an average of 1.8 grafts per patient). Of the 12 atrial vented patients (Group B) with new Q waves, 11 were restudied (Table 4), representing one single graft, 5 double and 5 triple grafts (an average of 2.4 grafts per patient), J. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
In Group A (ventricular venting), 17 patients with new Q waves had postoperative ventriculograms. Of these (Table 3), 3 (18%) had an improved v e n t r i c u l o g r a m a n d 0/7 graft closures, 4 (24%) had no change in the ventriculogram with 1/7 graft closure, and in 10 patients with deteriorated postoperative ventriculograms there were 7/16 graft closures (Table 4).
324
A I N T A B L I A N ET AL
TABLE 3 Correlation of Location of New O Wave, Patency of Graft, and Postoperative Ventriculogram in Group A Patients
Patient
Grafts LAD RCA CX
Patency LAD RCA CX
Contraction Preop Postop
HX MI
Admission EKG O Wave
New O
LVG improved
1.
X
X
+
+
As-Ant
Normal
+1
Inferior
Anterior
2.
X
X
+
+
As-Ant
Normal
+1
RBBB + Lateral
Inferior
3.
X
X
X
+
+
+
As-Ant
Normal
+1
Inferior (narrow Q)
Inferior (wide Q)
X
+
0
Normal
Normal
0
Normal
Septal
Normal
Normal
0
Inferior + Lateral
LAH + Anterior
LVG Unchanged 4. X
+
5.
X
6.
X
X
+
+
Normal Normal
0
Normal
Inferior
7.
X
X
+
+
Normal
Normal
+1
T11,111,AVF
Inferior
Ak-Apie Ak -Ant -Apic Normal AkApic
+3 0
TV1 _v 6
Anterior
Normal
Anterior
As-Apic AkApi . -Ant c Normal Ak-Apic
0 +2
Inferior
Anterior
T V1-V6
Anterior
As-Ant
Ak-Ant
0
LAH QRSWNL
Anterior
LVG Deteriorated 8. X
+
+
9.
X
0
10.
X
0
0
11.
X
0
O
12.
X
0
13.
X
X
+
+
Ak Ant
As-Ant Ak-lnf +Apic
+3
Anterior
Inferior
14.
X
X
+
+
As-lnf
Ak-lnf
0
Normal
Inferior
-t-
Normal Ak-Apic
0
Normal
Inferior
Normal Ak-Apic
0
IX]ormal
Lateral
Normal
I nferolateral
15.
X
16.
X
17.
X
0 X
+
+
In Group B (atrial venting), 11 patients with new Q waves were studied post-operatively. Of these, two had an improved ventriculogram and 0/6 graft closures. Six had an unchanged postoperative ventriculogram and 1/15 graft closures. Two had a deteriorated postoperative ventriculogram with 1/5 graft closures.
DISCUSSION Ventricular and Atrial Venting A striking decrease in the incidence of postoperative Q waves (from 22% to 5.5%) occurred when atrial rather than ventricular venting was adopted. The clear implication is
As-lnf
Ak -Inf -Apic
+2
t h a t sufficient myocardial t r a u m a r e s u l t s from ventricular vents to result in pathologic Q waves. The anatomic placement of ventricular vents at or near the apex corresponds with either inferior or anterior wall localization of the post-operative Q wave. Since the ventricular t r a u m a produced by venting is not due to arterial occlusion, there is no wide surrounding ischemic area. Thus, it is not surprising that postoperative Q waves attributable to venting are not always associated with impaired ventricular function in the absence of graft occlusion. Indeed, improved ventricular function m a y be observed. However, in four cases (13, 14, 15, 17) in which new inferior Q waves developed, new dysfuncJ. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
NEW Q WAVES AFTER BYPASS GRAFTING
13
I
Frl
aVL
aVR
aVF
Vl
V2
325
V3
V.
VS
Ve
Pre-op
~ post-op~
2 days post-op
20 days
Fig. 2. Case 26. Serial EKGs, demonstrating inverted T waves in Leads V1-V6 in the preoperative tracing (top) and appearance of Q waves in leads II, III and AVF in the postoperative tracings. Although the saphenous vein bypass graft was closed, postoperative left ventriculogram did not show deterioration.
TABLE 4 Correlation of Location of New Q Wave, Patency of Graft, and Postoperative Ventriculogram in Group B Patients
Patient
Grafts LAD RCA CX
Patency LAD RCA CX
Contraction Preop Postop
HX MI
Admission EKG Q Wave
New Q
LVG Improved 18. X
X
X
-I-
+
+
_~S_Apic-AntNormal
0
TV3-V 6
Septal
19.
X
X
+
+
-t-
As-Ant -Inf
Normal
0
Normal
inferior
X
-t-
+
Ak-lnf
Ak-lnf
+1
Inferior
Anterior
X
LVG Unchanged 20. X 21.
X
X
+
+
Normal
Normal
0
Normal
Inferior
22.
X
X
+
+
Normal
Normal
+1
TV3-V6
Inferior
23.
X
X
+
-t-
Normal
Normal
0
T 11,111. AVF
I nferior
24.
X
X
+
+
Normal
Normal
0
Normal
Inferior
25.
X
X
+
-t-
Normal
Normal
0
Normal
Inferior
Ak-lnf
Ak-lnf
0
TVI-V 6
Inferior
+
Normal
Ak -Ant -Apic
0
Normal
Anterior*
-t-
, -Ant ~S-Apic A k - A p i c
0
TV3-V 6
Lateral
26.
X
X
X
+
0
LVG Deteriorated 27. X X
X
+
28.
X
0
X
-t-
+
Abbreviations: LAD = Left anterior descending coronary artery RCA = Right coronary artery CX = Circumflex coronary artery HX MI = History of myocardial infarction LVG = Left ventriculogram As = Segmented hypokinesia Ak = Akinesia * Patent graft, but occluded distal left anterior descending artery J. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
326
AINTABLIAN ET AL
I
1-[
13[
aVR
aVE aVF
v2
v3
v4
vs
v6
Pre-op
2 days post-op
Fig. 3. Case 27. Serial EKGs, demonstrating normal preoperative EKG (top) and appearance of Q waves in the anterior wall leads in the three postoperative tracings. Although all grafts were patent in this patient, the distal left anterior descending artery was occluded beyond the anastomotic site and postoperative left ventriculogram showed deterioration. tion of the inferior wall and open grafts to the right coronary artery could be demonstrated. Here we assume t h a t the deterioration in the ventriculogram was probably secondary to the t r a u m a of venting. In contrast are six cases (9, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 28) all of whom developed new anterior Q waves and anterior wall dysfunction in the presence of occluded grafts to the left anterior descending artery. Here the presumption m u s t be t h a t infarction secondary to inadequate arterial and graft inflow occurred.
New Q Waves, Number of Grafts and Complete or Incomplete Revascularization The incidence of new Q waves was higher in p a t i e n t s with double and triple bypass surgery as compared to those with a single bypass, results similar to those reported by others. 4 However, in our series the incidence of new Q waves was not higher in patients with triple, as compared to those with double, vein bypass surgery, in contrast to the report of Espinoza and associates. 4 A l t h o u g h our p a t i e n t s with a t r i a l v e n t i n g had a h i g h e r p e r c e n t a g e of complete r e v a s c u l a r i z a t i o n , the incidence of new Q waves was not affected by complete or incomplete revascularization in patients within the atrial or ventricular venting group. It is worth mentioning t h a t in one p a t i e n t w i t h a t r i a l venting, a l t h o u g h saphenous vein bypass graft was patent, the coronary artery distal to the anastomosis was
closed, which explains the apearance of a new Q wave, as well as deterioration of left ventricular contractility.
Ventricular Function and Graft Patency Although Anderson and associates 8 noted no direct correlation between EKG evidence of t r a n s m u r a l myocardial infarction and graft closure, they did not comment on the ventriculographic findings. Brewer and associates 13 confirmed these findings in autopsy s t u d i e s of p a t i e n t s d y i n g a f t e r c o r o n a r y bypass surgery. In the present study, new Q waves were n o t e d in p a t i e n t s w i t h d e t e r i o r a t e d , unchanged, or even improved ventriculograms. When the data on new Q waves and posto p e r a t i v e v e n t r i c u l a r f u n c t i o n w e r e correlated, no direct relationship could be seen. However, when graft patency was also considered, a clear relationship emerged. Improved postoperative v e n t r i c u l a r f u n c t i o n correlated well with graft patency, despite Q waves. An unimproved or deteriorated ventricular function did not correlate with graft occlusion, since more t h a n h a l f of the vein grafts placed in these patients were patent. Assad-Morell and associates 14 also noted no correlation between graft closure, electrocardiographic and angiographic evidence of myocardial infarction because h a l f of their 32 patients had patent grafts, despite evidence of myocardial infarction in the area of distribuJ. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
NEW Q WAVES AFTER BYPASS GRAFTING
tion of the grafted vessels. It is important to note t h a t in our series, patients with single bypass grafts in whom the postoperative left ventriculogram showed deterioration invariably had occluded bypass grafts or a patent graft with occlusion of coronary artery distal to the anastomosis (Tables 3 and 4). Although one of our patients (Case 3), with history of previous myocardial infarction and narrow Q waves in the the inferior wall leads, posto p e r a t i v e l y developed s i g n i f i c a n t n e w Q waves in the same location and left ventricu l o g r a m showed i m p r o v e m e n t of a n t e r i o r wall motion with no change in the inferior wall motion, none of our patients after coron a r y bypass surgery manifested the phenome n o n of " u n m a s k i n g of old i n f a r c t i o n " described by Bassan and associates2
Q Waves and Atrial Venting When new Q waves appeared after bypass graft using the atrial venting technique, and v e n t r i c u l a r f u n c t i o n was u n i m p r o v e d or worsened, graft closure or occlusion of the distal coronary a r t e r y was common. Compromised arterial inflow and myocardial infarction must be presumed. Of great interest are those patients with new Q waves following atrial venting whose ventriculograms improved and whose grafts were patent. The new Q waves must be a consequency of surgical trauma. Two possibilities are suggested. First, direct myocardial damage with muscle necrosis m a y occur, sufficient to produce Q waves, but undetectable by v e n t r i c u l o g r a p h y . Second, the surgical t r a u m a might result in localized ventricular conduction d e l a y s or blocks affecting the early QRS balance, as postulated by Castellanos. 15 He theorized t h a t such local delays in ischemic tissue result in slurring or widening of the QRS, producing "infarct" Qs. It seems reasonable t h a t a similar mechanism in traumatized tissue may account for postoperative Q waves in these patients with improved ventriculograms and patent grafts.
Clinical Significance and Prognosis Post-bypass grafting Q waves, as described and discussed, have a varied pathogenesis. When accompanied by improvement in ventricular function and patent grafts, they are of little significance and do not carry the prognostic importance of myocardial infarction as it occurs in the n a t u r a l course of arteriosclerotic heart disease. In contrast, when accompanied by graft closure and deteriorated ventricular function, the mechanism may be presumed ischemic and the prognosis must take into account the likelihood of p e r m a n e n t or l o n g - t e r m localized ventricular dysfunction.
J. ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, VOL. 9, NO. 4, 1976
327
REFERENCES 1. WILLIAMS,D, IBEN, A, HURLEY,E, MILLER,R, BONANNO, J, MASSUMI,R, ZELIS,R, MASON, D T ANDAMSTERDAM,E A; Myocardial infarction during coronary artery bypass surgery (abstr). Am J Cardio 31:164,1973 2. FRIEDBERG, D, ZEFT, H, SIBERMAN R ET AL: Myocardial infarction following coronary surgery: Vectorcardiographic assessment (abstr). Am J Cardiol 31:132, 1973 3. ANDERSON,W T, BRUNDAGE,B H AND CHEITLIN, M D: Vectorcardiographic changes following coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J 87:421, 1974 4. ESPINOZA,J, LWSKI,J, LITWAK,R, DONOSO, E ANDDACK,S: New Q waves after coronary artery bypass surgery for angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 33:221, 1974 5. SCHRANK,J P, SLABAUGH,T K ANDBECKWITH, J R: The incidence and clinical significance of ECG-VCG changes of myocardial infarction following aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass surgery. Am Heart J 87:46, 1974 6. MANLEY, J C AND JOHNSON, W D: Effects of surgery on angina (pre-and postinfarction) and myocardial function (failure). Circulation 46:1208, 1972 7. DREIFUS,L, CANNAROZZI,N AND RABBINO,M: Electrocardiographic alterations following prosthetic valve replacement. Circulation 29-30 (Suppl III-70), 1964 8. HULTGREN,H N, HUBIS, H AND SHUMWAYN: Cardiac function following prosthetic aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J 77:585, 1969 9. BASSAN,M M, OATFIELD,R, HOFFMAN,I, MATLOFF,J ANDSWAN,H J C: New Q waves after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Unmasking of an old infarction. N Engl J Med 290:349, 1974 10. HAMBY,R I, GUPTA, M P AND YOUNG, M W: Clinical and hemodynamic aspects of single vessel coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 85:458, 1973 11. HAMBY,R I, HOFFMAN,I, HILSENRATH,J, AINTABLIAN,A, SHANIES,S ANDPADMANABHAN,V S: Clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic aspects of inferior and anterior myocardial infarctions in patients with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 34:513, 1974 12. BLACKBURN,H, KEYS, A, SIMPSON, E ET AL: The electrocardiogram in population studies: classification system. Circulation 21:1160, 1960 13. BREWER,D, BILBRO, R H AND BARTEL, A G: Myocardial infarction as a complication of coronary bypass surgery. Circulation 47:58, 1973 14. ASSAD-MORELL,J L, GAU, G T, FRYE, R, CONNOLLY, D, DAVIS, G D AND DANIELSON,, G K: Relation of early postoperative myocardial infarction to patency of aortocoronary bypass grafts and to ungrafted coronary arteries (abst). Am J Cardiol 33:124, 1974 15. CASTELLANOS,A, JR AND LEMBERG, L: Post infarction conduction disturbances. In Vectorcardiography, I HOFFMANANDR C TAYMOR, eds. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1965, pp 219-225