SiC catalysts prepared by hydrothermal method for carbon dioxide reforming of methane

JOURNAL OF FUEL CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY Volume 44, Issue 12, December 2016 Online English edition of the Chinese language journal Cite this article as: J Fuel Chem Technol, 2016, 44(12), 14731478

RESEARCH PAPER

Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts prepared by hydrothermal method for carbon dioxide reforming of methane WANG Bing1,2, JIN Guo-qiang1,*, WANG Ying-yong1, GUO Xiang-yun1 1

State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China;

2

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Abstract:

Ni-Sm/SiC (Ni: 9%, Sm: 5%) catalysts were prepared by a hydrothermal route for carbon dioxide reforming of methane.

The catalysts were characterized by XRD, BET, ICP, H2-TPR, TG-DTA and TEM. The catalytic performance, influence of different nickel precursors and carbon deposition in the CO2 reforming of CH4 were investigated. The results suggested that the Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts prepared by a hydrothermal route showed excellent catalytic activity, stability and good coke resistance. Different nickel precursors nearly had no impact on the performance of the catalysts. Keywords:

CO2 reforming of CH4; Ni-Smx/SiC catalysts; hydrothermal method

In recent years, anthropogenic carbon dioxide emission has received global concerns[1]. CO2 reforming of methane can utilize CO2 as a feedstock. This process converts CH4 and CO2 to H2 and CO, and the ratio of H2/CO is suitable for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, carbonylation and hydroformylation[2–4]. One of the main challenges on CO2 reforming of methane is to develop stable and coke-resistant catalyst. The noble metal catalysts (Pd, Rh, Pt, Ru, Ir) have high activity and low carbon deposition[5]. However, high cost has restricted their application. Nickel catalysts have been widely used in carbon dioxide reforming of methane due to low cost and considerable activity compared to the noble catalysts. However, the nickel catalysts are easily sintered and deactivated via carbon deposition[6]. Much efforts have been devoted to improve the performance of the nickel catalysts, such as using more stable supports, adding promoters (alkaline metal oxide, alkaline earth metal oxide and rare earth metal oxide) to improve the activity of catalysts, altering preparation method to increasing the dispersion of nickel and so on[4,5,7]. García-Vargas et al[7] found Ni-Mg/SiC catalyst had a high catalytic performance and stability (with a lower coke formation) during the methane tri-reforming reaction since Mg provoked a decrease of Ni particle size and an increase of both the interaction between nickel and support. SiC, as a catalyst support, has excellent chemical stability, high mechanical strength and good thermal conductivity[8,9].

Yu et al[10] prepared Ni/SiC catalyst for methanation of CO, and found that the catalyst exhibited high activity and stability. Zhi et al[11] found that Ni/SiC was also excellent catalyst for methanation of carbon dioxide. After adding promoter (La2O3) to Ni/SiC, the interaction between nickel nanoparticles and SiC was enhanced. Besides, carbon deposition and sintering of nickel nanoparticles were effectively suppressed. In our previous work, Ni-Smx/SiC catalysts (Ni: 9%, x=0, 2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, 7%) were prepared by impregnation method[12]. Ni-Sm5/SiC catalyst exhibited high activity and low carbon deposition in CO2 reforming of CH4 under 10000 mL/(g·h) of GHSV at 800°C. The addition of Sm2O3 enhanced the interaction between nickel nanoparticles and SiC support, and Sm2O3, as an alkaline rare earth metal oxide can efficiently absorb CO2 to promote carbon deposition-elimination process, correspondingly increased the stability of catalyst. However, the catalytic performance and carbon deposition of Ni-Smx/SiC catalysts prepared by the impregnation method are not yet satisfied because the dispersion of nickel nanoparticles was not homogeneous and the nickel particles size was large. The hydrothermal synthesis is an efficient method to increase the dispersion of active component and control the size of metal nanoparticles[13,14]. Besides, different nickel precursors may have effects on the performance of catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane.

Received: 19-Aug-2016; Revised: 29-Sep-2016. Foundation items: Supported by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 program, 2011CB201405) and the Key Science and Technology Projects of Shanxi Province (20131101035). *Corresponding author. Tel/ Fax: 0351-4049306, E- mail: gqjin@ sxicc.ac.cn. Copyright  2016, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Limited. All rights reserved.

WANG Bing et al / Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(12): 14731478

In this paper, we prepare Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts (Ni: 9%, Sm: 5%) by a hydrothermal route using nickel nitrate and nickel acetylacetonate as nickel precursors, respectively. The catalysts show high activity and stability in CO2 reforming of CH4, and the coke deposition is well controlled.

spectroscopy (ICP-AES, Thermo iCAP 6300). X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was conducted on MiniFlexII using Cu K radiation at 30 kV and 15 mA. Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were conducted in a Micromeritics Xianquan TP 5080 with a thermal conductivity detector under a flow of 10% H2/N2. Thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) were performed on Rigaku analyzer with a temperature range from room temperature to 900°C with a heating rate of 5°C/min in air atmosphere. The morphology of catalyst was analyzed by JEOL-2100 transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

1

1.3

Table 1 BET and ICP results of the Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts Sample

Pure SiC

HN catalyst

HA catalyst

Surface area A/(m2g–1)

36.8

82.2

74.7

Ni loading w/%

–

8.62

8.52

Sm loading w/%

–

4.91

4.57

1.1

Experimental Catalyst preparation

SiC support was prepared by a sol-gel and carbothermal reduction process[15]. The amounts of nickel and samarium are fixed on 9% and 5% (by weight), respectively. Taking the catalyst with nickel nitrate precursor for example, 0.1479 g Sm(NO3)36H2O and 0.503 g Ni(NO3)26H2O were firstly dissolved into 60 mL deionized water. Then 1 g of SiC, 0.73 g of cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide and 0.6 g of urea were added into the solution. After stirring for an hour, the suspension was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave of 80 mL and then heated at 150°C for 12 h. Then cooling to the room temperature, the solid was obtained by centrifugation and then dried at 110°C for 12 h. Finally, the solid was calcined in a muffle furnace at 500°C for 4 h to get the catalyst (denoted as HN). The catalyst with nickel acetylacetonate precursor was synthesized by the same way (denoted as HA). Both catalysts were directly used for carbon dioxide reforming of methane without prereduction. 1.2

Catalyst characterization

BET surface area was characterized by Micromeritics Tristar 3000 at nitrogen temperature at 77 K. The amount of Ni and Sm was measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission

Fig. 1

Catalytic activity test

Carbon dioxide reforming of methane reaction was conducted in a fixed-bed quartz reactor with an interior diameter 10 mm at atmospheric pressure. 200 mg catalyst was put into the reactor and fixed by quartz cotton on both ends. The reforming reaction was performed for 120 h under 10000 mL/(g·h) of GHSV (molar ratio of CH4/CO2 was 1) at 800°C. Gas effluents were analyzed with a gas chromatograph (Techcomp GC-7900).

2 2.1

Results and discussion BET surface area and ICP

The surface area and metal loadings of catalysts are listed in Table 1. Pure SiC has a surface area of 36.8 m2/g. The surface areas of HN and HA catalysts are 82.2 and 74.7 m2/g, respectively. These values are obviously higher than those of pure SiC and the Ni-Sm5/SiC catalyst prepared by impregnation method (with a BET surface area of 25.3 m2/g)[12]. This could result from that the nanoparticles of active components formed by the hydrothermal route are well dispersed and with smaller size. This is further confirmed by the XRD and TEM results. The analysis of ICP demonstrates that Ni loading and Sm loading of both catalysts are around 9% and 5% which are close to theoretical values, respectively.

XRD patterns of the fresh (a) and used (b) Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts

WANG Bing et al / Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(12): 14731478

The difference in the size of Sm2O3 particles between HN and HA catalysts may be caused by different nickel precursors. 2.3

Fig. 2

2.2

H2-TPR profiles of the Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts

XRD analysis

The XRD patterns of HN and HA catalysts are shown in Figure 1. For the fresh catalysts (Figure 1(a)), the diffraction peaks centered at 35.7°, 41.5°, 60.1°, 71.9° and 75.7° correspond to (111), (200), (220), (311) and (222) planes of SiC[15]. The diffraction peak at 33.6°is corresponding to the stacking fault of SiC[15]. The diffraction peaks of NiO usually appear at 37.3°, 43.3° and 62.9°[11,16]. However, these peaks are not observed in the XRD patterns, indicating that NiO nanoparticles are well dispersed and the size of the NiO nanoparticles is too small to be detected. There is a small diffraction peak of Sm2O3 at 28.3° for the both catalysts[17]. After 120 h reaction, there is no change in the SiC diffraction peaks, suggesting that SiC has excellent stability and chemical inertness as the support. The new diffraction peaks centered at 44.5°, 51.8°and 76.4° correspond to (111), (200) and (220) planes of metallic Ni for the both catalysts (Figure 1(b))[11]. The crystalline sizes of metallic Ni for HN and HA catalysts are 14.5 and 20.1 nm calculated by the XRD measurements, respectively. This demonstrates that NiO is reduced to Ni0 during the reaction. Besides, we observed the obvious diffraction peaks of Sm2O3 at 28.3°, 47.0°and 55.7°for the HN catalyst after the reaction[18]. This indicates that the size of Sm2O3 particles in HN catalysts increases during the reaction.

Fig. 3

H2-TPR analysis

H2-TPR analysis is employed to characterize the interaction between support and active components. The HN and HA catalysts have similar H2-TPR profiles (Figure 2). The tiny peak at around 350°C is ascribed to the reduction of pure NiO, suggesting that there is only small amount of large and bare NiO particles on the SiC surface[9,12]. The main H2 consumption peak between 450 and 750°C can be ascribed to the reduction of NiO species with strong interaction with the support. These indicate that nickel nanoparticles are homogeneously dispersed. It is in agreement with the XRD and TEM results. The interaction between support and nickel nanoparticles is enhanced, and thus the stability of catalysts is improved. For Ni-Sm/SiC catalyst prepared by impregnation method, there is a sharp reduction peak at 430°C[12]. H2-TPR profile of 5% Sm/SiC suggests that Sm3+ can not be reduced even at 900°C (shown in Figure 2). 2.4

TG-DTA analysis

The amount of carbon deposition is an important factor which influences the performance of catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. TG-DTA results of HN and HA catalysts are shown in Figure 3. After 120 h reforming reaction, the amounts of carbon deposition on HN and HA catalyst are 4.5% and 6.4%, respectively (Figure 3 (a)). They are much lower than the carbon deposition of Ni/SiC (13.5%) and Ni-Sm5/SiC (7.2%) catalysts prepared by impregnation method[12]. It suggests that the carbon deposition is suppressed due to the homogeneous dispersion of Ni nanoparticles. Besides, there is a tiny peak ranging from 300 to 400°C for the both catalysts which is a result of Ni0 oxidation[19]. Figure 3(b) shows the DTA profiles of both catalysts.

TG (a) and DTA (b) profiles of the used catalysts

WANG Bing et al / Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(12): 14731478

Fig. 4

Evolution of conversion with time on stream over different catalysts (a): HN; (b): HA

reaction conditions: temperature=800C, GHSV=10000 mL/(g·h), CH4/CO2 (molar ratio)=1.0

Fig. 5

TEM images of the (a) fresh and (b) used HN catalysts

The exothermic peaks caused by carbon combustion of HN and HA catalysts are around 570 and 600°C, respectively. The different exothermic peak positions are due to the different structure and morphology of coke. The TG-DTA analysis demonstrates that the catalysts prepared by hydrothermal method have good resistance to carbon deposition. 2.5

Catalytic performance

The catalytic performance of HN and HA catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane are investigated. They both exhibit excellent activity and stability as shown in Figure 4. For the HN catalyst (Figure 4 (a)), the conversions of CH4 and CO2 are above 96% and 92%, respectively. During the 120 h reaction, there is no loss of activity. The HA catalyst exhibits the similar activity as HN catalyst (Figure 4 (b)). The conversions of CH 4 and CO2 of HA catalyst are around 95% and 90%, respectively. However, there is an obvious fluctuation of CO 2 conversion in the first few hours of the reaction which means the existence of carbon deposition-elimination process (CH4 =C + 2H2, CO2 + C = 2 CO)[20]. The conversions of CH4 and CO2 of the

Ni-Sm5/SiC catalyst prepared by impregnation method are around 95% and 91%, respectively[12]. The TEM images of fresh and used HN catalysts are compared as shown in Figure 5. There were only some silk-like structures detected for fresh HN catalyst (Figure 5(a)). It indicated the active component was well-distributed over the surface of SiC support and the active metal particles can not be seen by HRTEM analysis. Combined with BET and XRD results, it further confirms the active metal nanoparticles formed by hydrothermal synthesis have ultra small size and high dispersion[21]. After the reaction, the metal nanoparticles can be obviously observed with an average size of 11.5 nm which is close to the size (14.5 nm) calculated by XRD measurements. Besides, some crystalline carbon nanotubes can be found on the catalyst (Figure 5(b)).

3

Conclusions

In this paper, the Ni-Sm/SiC (Ni: 9%, Sm: 5%) catalysts prepared by a hydrothermal route show excellent activity and stability for CO2 reforming of CH4. Different nickel precursors nearly have no effect on the properties of the Ni-Sm/SiC catalysts. Nickel nanoparticles are uniformly

WANG Bing et al / Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2016, 44(12): 14731478

dispersed and have strong interaction with SiC support by the hydrothermal method. Besides, the carbon deposition is well controlled.

from CO methanation over SiC supported Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts. Catal Commun, 2013, 31: 5–10. [11] Zhi G J, Guo X N, Wang Y Y, Jin G Q, Guo X Y. Effect of La2O3 modification on the catalytic performance of Ni/SiC for

References

methanation of carbon dioxide. Catal Commun, 2011, 16(1): 56–59.

[1] Sharifi M, Haghighi M, Abdollahifar M. Sono-dispersion of

[12] Wang B, Guo C X, Wang Y Y, Jin G Q, Guo X Y. Performance

bimetallic Ni-Co over zeolite Y used in conversion of

of Ni-Smx/SiC for CO2 reforming of CH4. J Fuel Chem Technol,

greenhouse gases CH4/CO2 to high valued syngas. J Nat Gas Sci E, 2015, 23: 547–558.

2016, 44(5): 587–596. [13] Singha R K, Yadav A, Agrawal A, Shukla A, Adak S, Sasaki T,

[2] Huang X, Xue G X, Wang C Z, Zhao N, Sun N N, Wei W, Sun Y

Bal R. Synthesis of highly coke resistant Ni nanoparticles

H. Highly stable mesoporous NiO-Y2O3-Al2O3 catalysts for CO2

supported MgO/ZnO catalyst for reforming of methane with

reforming of methane: Effect of Ni embedding and Y2O3 promotion. Catal Sci Technol, 2016, 6(2): 449–459.

carbon dioxide. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2016, 191: 165–178. [14] Acharyya S S, Ghosh S, Bal R. Fabrication of three-dimensional

[3] Amin M H, Mantri K, Newnham J, Tardio J, Bhargava S K.

(3D) raspberry-like copper chromite spinel catalyst in a facile

Highly stable ytterbium promoted Ni/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts for

hydrothermal route and its activity in selective hydroxylation of

carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Appl Catal B: Environ,

benzene to phenol. ACS Appl Mater Inter, 2014, 6(16):

2012, 119: 217–226.

14451−14459.

[4] Liu H T, Li S Q, Zhang S B, Wang J M, Zhou G J, Chen L,

[15] Jin G Q, Guo X Y. Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous

Wang X L. Catalytic performance of novel Ni catalysts

silicon carbide. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2003, 60:

supported on SiC monolithic foam in carbon dioxide reforming of methane to synthesis gas. Catal Commun, 2008, 120(1/2): 51–54.

207–212. [16] Aw M S, Zorko M, Djinovc P, Pintar A. Insights into durable NiCo catalysts on β-SiC/CeZrO2 and γ-Al2O3/CeZrO2 advanced

[5] Li J F, Xia C, Au C T, Liu B S. Y2O3-promoted NiO/SBA-15 catalysts highly active for CO2/CH4 reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(21): 10927–10940.

supports prepared from facile methods for CH4-CO2 dry reforming. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2015, 164: 100–112. [17] Jahangiri A, Pahlavanzadeh H, Aghabozorg H. Synthesis,

[6] Zanganeha R, Rezaei M, Zamaniyan A. Dry reforming of

characterization and catalytic study of Sm doped LaNiO3

methane to synthesis gas on NiO-MgO nanocrystalline solid

nanoparticles in reforming of methane with CO2 and O2. Int J

solution catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(7): 3012–3018. [7] García-Vargas J M, Valverde J L, Díez J, Sánchez P, Dorado F. Influence of alkaline and alkaline-earth cocations on the performance of Ni/-SiC catalysts in the methane tri-reforming reaction. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2014, 148–149: 322–329. over

Pd/ZrO2/SiC,

Pd/CeO2/SiC,

CO2 reforming of methane over Sm2O3-La2O3-supported Ni catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2009, 48: 7498–7504. [19] Li J F, Xia C, Au C T, Liu S B. Y2O3-promoted NiO/SBA-15 catalysts highly active for CO2/CH4 reforming. Int J Hydrogen

[8] Guo X N, Zhi G J, Yan X Y, Jing Q, Guo X Y, Brault P. Methane combustion

Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 9977–9984. [18] Zhang W D, Liu B S, Zhan Y P, Tian Y L. Syngas production via

and

Energy, 2014, 39: 10927–10940. [20] Yang R Q, Xing C, LüC G, Shi L, Tsubak N. Promotional effect

Pd/Zr0.5Ce0.5O2/SiC catalysts. Catal Commun, 2011, 12(10):

of La2O3 and CeO2 on Ni/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts for CO2

870–874.

reforming of CH4. Appl Catal A: Gen, 2010, 385: 92–100.

[9] Guo P F, Jin G Q, Guo C X, Wang Y Y, Tong X L, Guo X Y.

[21] Xie S, Guo X N, Jin G Q, Tong X L, Wang Y Y, Guo X Y. In situ

Effect of Yb2O3 promotor on the performance of Ni/SiC

grafted carbon on sawtooth-like SiC supported Ni for

catalysts in CO2 reforming of CH4. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2014,

high-performance supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Commun,

42(6): 719–726.

2014, 50: 228–230.

[10] Yu Y, Jin G Q, Wang Y Y, Guo X Y. Synthesis of natural gas