Journal Pre-proof NIR aza-pentamethine dyes as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy Haiqiao Huang, Daipeng Huang, Mingle Li, Qichao Yao, Ruisong Tian, Saran Long, Jiangli Fan, Xiaojun Peng PII:
S0143-7208(19)32807-4
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108284
Reference:
DYPI 108284
To appear in:
Dyes and Pigments
Received Date: 3 December 2019 Revised Date:
21 January 2020
Accepted Date: 14 February 2020
Please cite this article as: Huang H, Huang D, Li M, Yao Q, Tian R, Long S, Fan J, Peng X, NIR azapentamethine dyes as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy, Dyes and Pigments (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108284. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
This work was finished through contributions of all authors.
Haiqiao Huang: The design and synthesis of aza-pentamethine dyes used in this work,
most of tests in vitro, Data curation, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing - Review & Editing. Daipeng Huang: Data curation, Some tests in vitro, Formal analysis. Mingle Li: Methodology, Formal analysis. Qichao Yao: Data Curation. Ruisong Tian: Visualization. Saran Long: Resources. Jiangli Fan: Visualization, Supervision. Xiaojun Peng: Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing - Review & Editing.
All authors have given approval to the final version of this manuscript.
We firstly used aza-indole to increase the absorption wavelength of pentamethine dyes and used it for photodynamic therapy at 730 nm.
• ARTICLES •
NIR aza-pentamethine dyes as photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy Haiqiao Huang a, Daipeng Huang a, Mingle Li a, Qichao Yao a, Ruisong Tian a, Saran Long a, b, Jiangli Fan a, b and Xiaojun Peng a, b * a State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian university of Technology, 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, P. R. China. b Research Institute of Dalian University of Technology in Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518057, China.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an appealing modality has been used to treat various malignant tumors. Compared with conventional PDT treatment activated by ultraviolet or visible light, near infrared (NIR) light triggered PDT possessing deeper penetration to lesion area and lower photodamage to normal tissue holds great potential for deep-seated tumor. To address these obstacles for PDT treatment, we firstly used aza-indole to modify pentamethine dyes to facilitate a large bathochromatic shift of the absorption maximum from 650 nm to 730 nm in the photo-therapeutic window. Interesting, BY-Br have higher molar extinction coefficient than BY-H, allowing BY-Br to absorb more light for enhance its therapeutic effect. Meanwhile, the introduction of bromine atoms has been enhanced reactive oxygen species generation (ROS) after laser irradiation. Furthermore, the new photosensitizer, BY-Br could specifically target to mitochondria, and substantial kill tumor cells through apoptotic pathway upon irradiation.
Keyword: aza-pentamethine, NIR, mitochondria, photodynamic therapy
1 Introduction
intersystem crossing (ISC)-mediated singlet-to-triplet
As a specific spatiotemporal selective and minimal non-invasive
therapeutic
method
for
tumours,
photodynamic therapy (PDT) induced by the external laser irradiations has attracted tremendous research interest
[1-5].
PDT
employs
a
light-excited
photosensitizer (PS) generate the triplet PS then via
transfer its excited triplet state energy to the surrounding molecular oxygen to form cytotoxic singlet oxygen (1O2) and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) [6,7]. The attractive feature of PDT is that photodynamic reactions just happen in the immediate locale of light-absorbing PS. However, most of the available PSs clinically approved for PDT were only active under UV-visible light (<700
*Corresponding authors. State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Dalian university of Technology, Dalian 116024, China. E-mail addresses:
[email protected]
nm) with low tissue penetration. So far, a range of
heptamethine cyanines have been synthesized and used
Scheme 1 illustrates the structure of conventional
for PDT by NIR light [8-10]. Most of synthetic PSs are
pentamethine
hydrophobic in nature with poor solubility in water and
aza-pentamethine dyes BY-Br and BY-H. We firstly used
the structural instability due to the long of methine chain
aza-indole to modify pentamethine dyes. Having
[11].
introduced
nitrogen
atoms,
applications [12-15]. Herein, a near-infrared (NIR)
wavelength
of
modified
excited PS for deeper penetration against deep-seated
increased from 650 nm to 730nm compared of traditional
tumours is still urgently required.
pentamethine dyes. Bromine atom has been introduced at
This
disadvantage
impedes
their
further
dyes
the
CY-H
and
the
maximum
new
NIR
absorption
penthamethine
dyes
Mitochondria are essential cellular organelles and
5-position of the aza-indole to increase the ability of
play crucial roles in energy supply and cell apoptosis
intersystem crossing through the heavy atom effect to
[16,17]. Moreover, mitochondria are reported to be
produce more ROS, thereby improving the therapeutic
susceptible to excessive ROS. When mitochondria were
effect on the cancer [22]. More importantly, the
photo-damaged,
their
introduction of the bromine atom also increases its molar
mitochondrial membrane potential and initiate apoptosis
extinction coefficient, allowing PS to absorb more light
[18-20]. Recently, we reported a mitochondrial targeting
to enhance its therapeutic effect. In addition, the cationic
bromo-pentamethine dyes anticancer photosensitizers
of PS itself give it not only have better solubility but also
that induced cancer cells apoptosis under light [21].
locate in mitochondria. Furthermore, aza-pentamethine
However, this symmetric pentamethines were also active
were utilized for the evaluation of the photodynamic
under the UV-visible light (<700 nm), limiting tumour
therapeutic effect in vitro.
they
immediately
lose
deeper penetration and making biomedical applications more difficult. Therefore, a great deal of research work has focussed on developing new PSs with absorption maximum
in
the
phototherapeutic
window,
and
mitochondria targeted in an attempt to broaden the applicability of PDT. In this work, we have designed brominated aza-pentamethine with near-infrared absorption and combined mitochondria-targeting for enhanced PDT. 2
orded on a Bruker Avance II 400 MHz and 500 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) were reported as ppm in MeOD with TMS as the internal standard. Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) was purchased from Shanghai Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. Water used in all experiments was doubly purified by Milli-Q Academic A10 Ultrapure water system equipment. The preparation procedures of BY-Br and BY-H and related intermediates are given in the Supporting Information (Scheme S1). The solutions of BY-Br Scheme 1 Chemical structures of the conventional pentamethine dyes and the aza-pentamethine dyes
and BY-H were typically prepared from 5.0 mM stock solutions in DMSO.
2
Materials and methods
2.1 Material and sample preparation All solvents and reagents used were reagent grade. All reactions were performed in a nitrogen atmos-
2.2 Measurements of absorption and fluorescence Absorption spectra were measured on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer). Fluorescence spectra were obtained with
phere with dry, freshly distilled solvents under an-
a VAEIAN CARY Eclipse fluorescence spectropho-
hydrous conditions. Silica gel (100-200 mesh) which
tometer (Serial No. FL0812:M018). The fluores-
obtained from Qingdao Ocean Chemicals was used
cence quantum yield (Φf) was measured with A
for flash column chromatography for purifications.
Quantaurus-QY spectrometer (Hamamatsu, C11347)
Reversed-phase preparative HPLC was performed
[23].
using a CHEETAH medium pressure rapid purifica-
2.3 Fluorescence Lifetime Measurements
tion preparation system utilizing a Claricep Flash
Time resolved fluorescence measurements were
C18 column (100 Å, 20-35 μm, 40 g) obtained from
performed on freshly prepared samples using the
Tianjin Bonna-Agela Technology Co., Ltd. (Tianjin,
time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC)
China). Mass spectrometric data were obtained using
method (PicoQuant PicoHarp 300) at room tempera-
HP1100LC/MSD MS and an LC/Q-TOF-MS in-
ture. Using deconvolution/fit program (PicoQuant
struments. 1H NMR and
FluFit), the time resolution was reached down to 10
3
13
C NMR spectra were rec-
carried
out
by
trapping
1
ps. The second harmonic of a titanium sapphire laser
was
O2
with
(Mai Tai DeepSee) at 400 nm (150 fs, 80 MHz) was
1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) [26]. In fact
selected as excitation source. Emission was moni-
DPBF reacts rapidly with 1O2 forming the colorless
tored at the wavelength of maximum fluorescence.
o-dibenzoylbenzene derivative, resulting from the
Data analysis was performed with FluoFit software
disappearance of DPBF’s characteristic absorption
(Picoquant) using an exponential decay model as
band at 415 nm. Thus, a solution of DPBF (45 μM)
described in the Supporting Information.
and Aza-pentamethine dyes (optical density was ad-
2.4 Determination of octanol-water partition coeffi-
justed to around 0.2-0.3 at the irradiation wave-
cient (log Po/w)
lengths) in 3 mL Dichloromethane (DCM) was irra-
The 1-octanol/water partition coefficient (log Po/w)
diated monochromatic light (700 nm or 730 nm) in-
was determined according to a reported procedure
tervals. The power density of the laser point is 10
[24,25]. Briefly, Solution A and Solution B were
mW·cm-2. The solutions were irradiated for 1.75 or 3
prepared by premixing 1-octanol and PBS buffer (10
minutes and their absorbance spectra were recorded
mM, pH 7.4) in a ratio of 1:4 and 4:1, respectively.
at 15 or 30 second intervals using a spectrometer.
Then, the solutions were shaking gently at 220 rpm,
Measurement singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) [27]
at RT for 24 h. Thereafter, small stock solutions (5
The decrease in quencher absorption at 415 nm, as
μL) of a 5 mM probe solution in DMSO was added
a function of the pentamethine irradiation time, has
to Solution A and Solution B (each 5 mL), respec-
been compared to the values obtained from meth-
tively. The above solutions were then mixed and
ylene blue (MB), an efficient and well-known singlet
stirred for 30 min. The concentration of the probe in
oxygen generator. The quantum yields were calcu-
each layer was measured by UV-Vis spectroscopy
lated by using methylene blue in dichloromethane
using the molar coefficients of the probes. The log
with ΦΔ = 0.57 the standard reference [28]. The ab-
Po/w value was calculated using the following equa-
sorbance
tion:
3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) was adjusted to
log Po/w=log C[probe]oct – log C[probe]PBS
(1)
2.5 Detection of singlet oxygen in vitro
of
the
1
O2
scavenger,
around 1.0 in air-saturated DCM. Then the photosensitizer was added and its absorbance was adjusted
A qualitative and comparative study of the abili-
to around 0.2-0.3. Then the cuvette was exposed to
ties of aza-pentamethine to generate singlet oxygen
monochromatic light (700 nm or 730 nm) for 3.5
4
minutes and their absorbance spectra were recorded
before light irradiation. As control, DHR123 aqueous
at 30 seconds intervals. The slope of the absorbance
solution without photosensitizers was subjected to
maxima of DPBF at 415 nm versus time graph was
irradiation.
calculated for each photosensitizer. The singlet oxy-
Hydroxyl radical (OH•) detection:
gen quantum yield (ΦΔ) is calculated using the fol-
For OH• evaluation, both PS and HPF were prepared
lowing equation (2) [25]:
as 5 μM in aqueous solution, and others procedure
Φ ΦMB KPS FMB PFMB / KMB FPS PFPS
(2)
Where K is the slope of the difference in the change
were consistent with that of O2•− measurement. 2.7 Intracellular PDT analysis by MTT
in the absorbance of DPBF (415 nm) with irradiation
The phototoxicity and dark toxicity of BY-Br and
time, and F is the absorption correction factor, which
BY-H were examined with or without light irradia-
is given by F=1-10-OD (OD at the irradiation wave-
tion at 700 nm and 730 nm respectively using MTT
length). PF is an absorbed photonic flux (μ Einstein
assay. MCF-7 cells were plated in 96-well plate with
dm-3 s-1). ΦMB is the singlet oxygen quantum yield of
5×104 cells/well, and incubated in 100 μL growth
MB.
medium under a humidified 5% CO 2 atmosphere at
2.6 Detection Production of Superoxide Radical (O2•−)
37°C for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were exposed to
and Hydroxyl radical (OH•) in Solution.
various concentrations of BY-H (0-5 μM), BY-Br
Superoxide Radical (O2•−) Detection:
(0-5 μM) separately, incubated for 2 h, then irradia-
For normoxia superoxide radical measurements, di-
tion with 700 nm (width of half wave 19 nm) or 730
hydrorhodamine123 (DHR123) was used as the spe-
nm (width of half wave 15 nm) NIR light at 20
cific indicator, which can be converted to Rhoda-
mW·cm-2 for 0, 5 min. After overnight incubation,
mine123 in the presence of O2•− and emit strong
the standard MTT assay was carried out to determine
green fluorescence at 526 nm. PS (5 μM) and
the cell viability. The cells were labelled with 0.5
DHR123 (5 μM) were prepared as in water. Then the
mg·mL-1 solution of MTT in full culture medium for
tube was exposed to 700 nm laser (20 mW cm-2) for
4 h, then the supernatant was removed and replaced
different time (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 min), and the emission
with 200 μL of DMSO and the formazan absorbance
spectra were observed immediately after each irradi-
was analysed by a microplate reader at 490 nm.
ation (Ex: 500 nm). For O2•− quenching experiment, 50 μM Vc was added to the above aqueous solution 5
2.8 Cell imaging and localization [29]
ROS generation was then carried out. Briefly, the
The cellular localization of a photosensitizer
culture medium of cells that was exposed to the re-
within tumour cells is a critical determinant of treat-
spective BY-Br (1 μM) was incubated for 2 h, and
ment efficacy. Confocal laser scanning microscopy
then DCFH-DA (10 μM) was added incubated for 10
(CLSM) and organelle-specific probes make it con-
min ensure DCFH-DA that sufficiently entered the
venient and precise to study the cellular localization
cells. The cells were then subjected to photosensiti-
of PS [30]. MCF-7 Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
zation by using 730 nm NIR lamp light irradiation
modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Invitrogen) sup-
for 0 or 5 min. Fluorescent images of DCFH, stain-
plemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen).
ing on the cells were promptly captured by excitation
Cells were seeded in 24-well flat-bottomed plates
at
and then incubated for 24 h at 37°C under 5% CO 2.
(OLYMPUS, FV3000).
Before imaging, the cells were incubated with
2.10 Confocal imaging of photo-induced cell death
BY-Br or BY-H for 2 h and Mito-Tracker Green FM
and Flow cytometric analysis [3,31]
488
nm
using
a
fluorescence
microscope
for 30 min, then stained with Hoechst 33342 (for 10
Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis
min), Mito-Tracker Green FM to stain mitochondria
Detection Kit (Beyotime, China) was used for detec-
and Hoechst 33342 to stain the cell nucleus. Then
tion of BY-Br mediated photo-induced cell death.
washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three
Briefly, MCF-7 cells were seeded onto 35 mm con-
times. Fluorescence imaging was performed using an
focal dishes for 24 h, then cells were treated with
OLYMPUSFV-3000 inverted fluorescence micro-
following different treatments: group 1, irradiated
scope with a 60×oil objective lens.
with 730 nm xenon lamp light for 5 min at a power
2.9 ROS generation during PDT treatment
density of 20 mW cm-2 (Light); group 2, incubated
The abilities of BY-Br to generate ROS within
with BY-Br (1 μM) at 37°C for 2 h (BY-Br +
MCF-7 cells were investigated by a singlet oxygen
nolight); group 3, incubated with BY-Br (1 μM) at
capture agent 2, 7- dichlorofluorescein diacetate
37°C for 2 h and irradiated with 730 nm xenon lamp
(DCFH-DA) using CLSM. MCF-7 cells were
light for 5 min at a power density of 20 mW cm -2
pre-treated with BY-Br and incubated with the cel-
(BY-Br + light); group 4, incubated with 10 mM
lular ROS indicator 2, 7-dichlorofluorescein diace-
Nacetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) at 37°C for 0.5 h, then
tate
incubated with BY-Br (1 μM) at 37°C for another 2
6
(DCFH-DA).
Irradiation-dependent
cellular
h and irradiated with 730 nm xenon lamp light for 5
λem = 671 nm in DCM) respectively (Fig. 1a b). Sig-
min at a power density of 20 mW cm-2 (NAC +
nificantly, after the conventional indole is replaced
BY-Br + light). After treatments, cells were stained
by aza-indole, the maximum absorption wavelength
with Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) Apop-
of the dye molecules is red-shifted. BY-Br and
tosis Detection Kit according to the agent instruction
BY-H display an intense absorption profile that lo-
(KeyGEN, China). The cell death process was visu-
calizes in the therapeutic window, promising deeper
alized by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytome-
permeability against deep-seated tumors. Detail op-
try. (AnnexinV-FITC, λex = 488 nm, λem = 500–550
tical properties of two dyes in different solvents
nm; PI, λex = 488 nm, λem = 600–680 nm).
shown in Table S1, Fig. S15. Although their wave-
3
length peaks are similar to each other, the molar ex-
Results and discussion
3.1 Spectral Properties of BY-Br and BY-H
tinction coefficient of them are different. As shown
The two aza-pentamethine dyes (BY-Br and
in Table S1, the extinction coefficients of the two
BY-H) have different substitutents (H and Br re-
dyes BY-Br and BY-H at the maximum absorption
spectively) at the 5-position of the aza-indole. As
wavelength are 2.79×10 5 L mol-1 cm-1 and 1.38×105
shown in Fig. 1, two dyes (BY-Br and BY-H) dis-
L mol-1 cm-1, respectively. We know that BY-Br
play a large bathochromatic shift of absorption
have higher molar extinction coefficient than BY-H,
maximum: BY-Br (λabs = 736 nm and λem = 756 nm
meanwhile, the fluorescence quantum yields repre-
in DCM), BY-H (λabs = 716 nm and λem = 736 nm in
sent opposite properties (Φf =0.501 for BY-Br and
DCM), and conventional CY-H (λabs = 651nm and
Φf =0.571 for BY-H in DCM).
Fig. 1 UV−vis−NIR absorption (a) and emission (b) spectra of Cy-H, BY-H and BY-Br in DCM with 1 μM, c) Crystal structures of BY-Br. All H atoms are omitted for clarity atomic scheme, Br: dark yellow, C: gray, I: red, N: blue.
7
Additionally, the fluorescence lifetime of the two
730 nm Xe lamp leads to a comparable 1O2 generation.
compounds has been also measured, which is shown
As shown in Fig. 2, the absorbance of DPBF degraded
in Fig. S16. The fluorescence lifetime of BY-Br is
gradually under the irradiation. However, when they
also shorter than that of BY-H, further demonstrated
were exposed to light, the decrease of DPBF absorbance
that the introduction of bromine shortens the lifetime
at 415 nm caused by the same PS was similar. The sin-
of the first excited singlet (S1) of dyes. This is due to
glet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ in Table 1) of BY-Br and
the introduction of bromine atoms to enhance the
BY-H irradiation with 730 nm Xe lamp is higher than
Intersystem Crossing (ISC) process [32]. Further-
irradiation with 700 nm Xe lamp, indicated that BY-Br
more, the single-crystal X-ray analysis of BY-Br
and BY-H have better utilization of light at 730 nm. This
fully confirmed that the carbon skeleton of the entire
also has a consistent reflection on the absorption coeffi-
molecule is on a plane except for the N-substituted
cient [33]. It has been predicted that higher the absorp-
ethyl group (Fig. 1c). It is cleared that the introduc-
tion coefficient, such as BY-Br, possesses more effec-
tion of N atoms extends delocalized system of
tively photon utility due to more photon trap, accordingly
BY-Br. Moreover, in order to ensure that the con-
more 1O2 generated. As known that an important charac-
centration used dyes is not aggregated, we measured
teristic for a compound to be considered a potent PS is to
the solubility with different concentrations. The re-
have an intense absorption within the “phototherapeutic
sults show BY-Br and BY-H have excellent solubil-
window”. Inspired by this result, we have verified the
ity in aqueous solutions (5.0 × 10 −6 mol L-1 for
effect of its photodynamic properties at the cellular level.
BY-Br and 10 × 10−6 mol L-1 for BY-H, Fig. S17).
Table 1 The photophysical characters of BY-Br and BY-H in
3.2 Generation of singlet oxygen
DCM PS
λabs(nm)a
λem(nm)b
Φ fc
ΦΔ-700d
ΦΔ-730e
μ af
BY-Br
736
756
0.501
0.027
0.031
0.94
ating singlet oxygen upon NIR excitation, DPBF as a O2
BY-H
716
736
0.571
0.014
0.017
0.43
detector was utilized. The measurement mechanism of
The all data of the solvents were measured at 25°C. a The
DPBF for 1O2 was illustrated in Fig. S18. The degrada-
max absorption peaks of dyes (nm). b The max fluorescence
To determine the ability of BY-Br and BY-H for gener1
tion of DPBF the absorption signal at 415 nm is indica-
peaks of dyes (nm). c The fluorescence quantum yield. d The singlet oxygen quantum yield upon the presence of 700 nm
tive of the amount of singlet oxygen generated. As indiirradiation. e The singlet oxygen quantum yield upon the
cated by the DPBF decolorization curves, irradiation on solution of BY-Br and BY-H in DCM with 700 nm or 8
presence of 730 nm irradiation. f The absorption coefficient upon the presence of 730 nm irradiation.
Fig. 2 Change in the absorbance spectrum of the trap molecule DPBF in the presence of BY-Br and BY-H in DCM.
3.3 Generation of other ROS
DHR123 signal was indeed caused by generated O2•−, as
To distinguish different ROS productions by BY-Br
expected, an increase in DHR 123 fluorescence at 526
and BY-H, we used dihydrorhodamine123 (DHR123) for
nm was inhibited after the addition of Vc. These results
superoxide radical detection and hydroxyphenyl fluores-
fully validated that the halogen increase the Intersystem
cein (HPF) for hydroxyl radical detection. Firstly, we
Crossing (ISC) process. On the other hand, no •OH was
confirmed the O2•− production by O2•− probe DHR123,
observed when we employed hydroxyphenyl fluorescein
which is nonfluorescent but can react with O2•− to emit
(HPF) as the specific indicators for •OH (Fig. S20 b).
strong green fluorescence centered at 526 nm. BY-Br
This result indicated that BY-Br and BY-H could be
substantially increased the fluorescence intensity of
generating O2•−. Several research groups have suggested
DHR123 under normoxia upon 700 nm Xe lamp irradia
that the Type II reaction dominates, while Type I occurs
tion (Fig. S20 a). Remarkably, BY-Br also led to a faster
only when the PS is highly concentrated in the tumour or
O2•− generation rate in comparison with BY-H. Moreo-
if the tumour is hypoxic in nature [34]. Taken together,
ver, vitamin C (Vc), a radical scavenger, was added into
our studies of ROS generated by BY-Br and BY-H indi-
PS solutions to further validate that the enhanced
cate that BY-Br exhibits relatively high oxygen sensitiv-
9
ity, resulting in its relatively high ΦΔ and generation of
with experimental data of ROS generation in solu-
O2•−, with subsequent photodynamic cytotoxicity.
tion. Hence, light 730 nm Xe lamp was chosen as a
3.4 In vitro photodynamic activity
suitable illumination source for subsequent testing.
A successful PDT photosensitizer is one that exhibits low cytotoxicity in dark and potent cytotoxicity in the presence of photo-irradiation. The cytotoxicity of aza-cyanine PS was evaluated under both light and dark conditions. The dark and light cytotoxicity of BY-Br and BY-H in MCF-7 cells were examined by using the MTT assay. Both compounds displayed negligible toxicity in the absence of light, suggesting their acceptable biocompatibility. The
Fig. 3 Comparison of the cytotoxic effects of BY-Br (blue bar) and BY-H (rad bar) on MCF-7 cells in the absence and
light cytotoxicity was tested under the irradiation by
presence of light (λ =730 nm or 700 nm, 20 mW·cm −2).
two different wavelength light sources (700 nm or 730 nm) with the dose of 20 mW cm -2. The results showed that BY-Br exhibited more potent activities than BY-H under two different wavelength irradiations. Meanwhile, compared with 700 nm irradiation, upon the presence of 730 nm irradiation, cell viability was rapidly decreased with the increase of dosage of PS. As can be observed from Fig. 3, 56% of cell viability remained in the presence of 2.5 μM of BY-H, and 2.5 μM of BY-Br caused almost complete cell death with only 9% of cell viability remained. It is suggested that BY-Br is considerably powerful for cancer cell ablation through PDT pathway, and therapeutic output is better on 730 nm irradiation than on 700 nm, which is in good accordance 10
3.5 Cell imaging and intracellular localization The co-localization of BY-Br and BY-H in mitochondria of MCF-7 cells with commercially available Mito-Tracker Green FM (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue) were investigated. As shown in Fig. 4, BY-Br exhibited high level of co-localization with that of Mito-Tracker Green FM, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficients was 0.918. In contrast, for BY-H comparatively a fewer overlap with Mito-Tracker Green FM, and the Pearson’s correlation coefficients was 0.856, which confirms less selectivity to mitochondria. On the other hand, both compound exhibited no overlap with the signals from
Hoechst 33342, indicate that aza-cyanine were not
diacetate (DCFH-DA) probe was selected to detect
located in the nucleus. The lipophilicity of BY-Br
the singlet oxygen generation under the irradiation of
and BY-H were determined by octanol/PBS partition
730 nm. DCFH-DA was non-fluorescence status
coefficient measurements using Poctanol/PBS = [C]octanol
could be transformed from into fluorescent 2,
layer / [C]PBS layer. BY-Br with two bromine was
7-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) in the presence of ROS.
found more lipophilic (P = 365, log P = +2.56) than
In the Fig. 5, DCFH-DA alone was almost non emis-
BY-H (P = 265, log P = +2.42). It is well known that
sive whether irradiated. In contrast, the cell incubat-
mitochondria targeting were numerically assigned in
ed with DCFH-DA and BY-Br in dark exhibits weak
accordance with the following criteria: electric
green fluorescence, while its emission intensity was
charge Z (cation number) > 0 and 0 < logP < +5.
triggered and rapidly raised after irradiation 5 min,
BY-Br and BY-H fully meet the criteria for mito-
illustrating that the high-efficiency ROS generation
chondrial accumulation. This result indicated that
of BY-Br.
such cationic aza-cyanine agents’ BY-Br are superior to target cell mitochondria.
Fig. 4 Co-localization of PS (1 μM) with a Mito-Tracker Green FM (200 nM) and Hoechst 33342 (2 μg/mL) in MCF-7
Fig. 5 Morphology changes and cellular ROS generation
cells imaged using a confocal microscope. Scale bars: 20 μm.
within MCF-7cells incubated with DCFH-DA (No BY-Br) or DCFH-DA+ BY-Br (BY-Br) with diffirent deal.(before light)
3.6 Intracellular singlet oxygen generation Encouraged by the attractive properties of BY-Br
control cell incubated indark, (light) with irradation 5 min; Scale bars = 20 μm.
in both superior photo-toxicity and mitochondria-specific targeting for MCF-7 cells. BY-Br was used as PSs for PDT application. In evaluating the intracellular ROS levels, 2, 7-dichlorofluorescein
3.7 photo-induced cell death by CLSM and flow cytometry observation For further demonstrating the PDT effect of BY-Br, the annexin V-FITC/PI kit has been applied
11
in this work for investigating the cell apoptosis and
could be generated the destructive 1O2 for killing
death pathway (Fig. 6 and Fig. S21). After MCF-7
MCF-7 cells through apoptosis.
cells were incubated with 1 μM BY-Br for 2 h fol-
4.
Conclusions
lowed by stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI, the sig-
In summary, we have developed a simple proto-
nal of annexin FTIC/PI cannot be observed, similar
col to prepare a novel type of pentamethine dye
to those treated with light alone. However, intense
BY-Br and BY-H possessing near-infrared absorp-
green and red fluorescence were detected in the PDT
tion characteristics and potential therapeutic agent
group, indicating that most cancer cells underwent
applied for PDT. To the best of our knowledge, this
late-stage apoptosis. Moreover, Nacetyl-L-cysteine
work is the first report using aza-indole to decorate
(NAC) as a ROS cleaner significantly prevented the
pentamethine dyes to facilitate a large bathochro-
cell damage, which further indicated that the ROS
matic shift of the absorption maximum from 650 to
induced by BY-Br were indeed responsible for the
730 nm in the photo-therapeutic window. The optical
cell destruction [35,36]. The flow cytometry has also
property measurements indicated that higher ab-
been used to evaluate BY-Br-induced cell death in
sorbance coefficient of BY-Br enabled it to be more
MCF-7 cells. As shown in Fig. 6, the group of PDT,
effectively photon utility can improve the generation
the population of apoptotic cells obviously increased
of 1O2. Meanwhile, bromine atom at the 5-position of
compare with the group without irradiation( Fig. 6c)
the aza-indole can enhance ROS generation. In vitro
and the control group (Fig. 6a and 6b), while the
studies show BY-Br can localize in mitochondria,
population of apoptotic cell had significantly de-
and efficiently kill cancer cell by generation ROS in
creased
cells and may be a potential single-molecule based
in the group of NAC+PDT. Overall, this
result clearly indicated that BY-Br under irradiation
12
PS candidate for PDT.
Fig. 6 Flow cytometer analysis of MCF-7 cells treated in different conditions a-e) Cells were cultured with PBS only, light irradiation only, BY-Br without irradiation, BY-Br under irradiation, and NAC & BY-Br under irradiation respectively. f) the apoptosis rate of different Group
Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts to declare.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project 21421005, 21576037, and U1608222).
References [1] Ji C, Gao Q, Dong X, Yin W, Gu Z, Gan Z, et al. A Size-Reducible Nanodrug with an Aggregation-Enhanced Photodynamic Effect for Deep Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy. Angew Chem Int Edit 2018;57:1-6. [2] Zhu J, Zou J, Zhang J, Sun Y, Dong X, Zhang Q. An anthracene functionalized BODIPY derivative with singlet oxygen storage ability for photothermal and continuous photodynamic synergistic therapy. J Mater Chem B 2019;7(20):3303-9. [3] Li M, Xia J, Tian R, Wang J, Fan J, Du J, et al. Near-Infrared Light-Initiated Molecular Superoxide 13
Radical Generator:Rejuvenating Photodynamic Therapy against Hypoxic Tumors. J Am Chem Soc 2018;140(44):14851-9. [4] Wu W, Shao X, Zhao J, Wu M. Controllable Photodynamic Therapy Implemented by Regulating Singlet Oxygen Efficiency. Adv Sci 2017;4(7):1700113-21. [5] Li M, Tian R, Fan J, Du J, Long S, Peng X. A lysosome-targeted BODIPY as potential NIR photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. Dyes Pigments 2017;147:99-105. [6] Huang X, Gu R, Li J, Yang N, Cheng Z, Si W, et al. Diketopyrrolopyrrole-Au(I) as singlet oxygen generator for enhanced tumor photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Sci China Chem 2019:1-10. [7] Yang X, Li J, Yu Y, Wang J, Li D, Cao Z, et al. Engineering of a universal polymeric nanoparticle platform to optimize the PEG density for photodynamic therapy. Sci China Chem 2019;62(10):1379-86. [8] Jordan Atchison S K H N, Dean M Nicholas C F J D, Callan A P M A. Iodinated cyanine dyes:a new class of sensitisers for use in NIR activated photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun 2017;53:2009-12. [9] Luo S, Tan X, Fang S, Wang Y, Liu T, Wang X, et al. Mitochondria ‐ Targeted Small ‐ Molecule Fluorophores for Dual Modal Cancer Phototherapy. Adv Funct Mater 2016;26(17):2826-35.
[10] Jiao L, Song F, Cui J, Peng X. A near-infrared heptamethine aminocyanine dye with a long-lived excited triplet state for photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun 2018;54(66):9198-201. [11] Deng K, Li C, Huang S, Xing B, Jin D, Zeng Q, et al. Recent Progress in Near Infrared Light Triggered Photodynamic Therapy. Small 2017;13(44):1702299. [12] Hu L, Wang P, Zhao M, Liu L, Zhou L, Li B, et al. Near-infrared rechargeable “optical battery” implant for irradiation-free photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 2018;163:154-62. [13] Liu Y, Teng L, Liu H, Xu C, Guo H, Yuan L, et al. Recent advances in organic-dye-based photoacoustic probes for biosensing and bioimaging. Sci China Chem 2019;62(10):1275-85. [14] Jiang X, Dai Z. Advances in equipment for tumor photodynamic therapy. Chinese Sci Bull 2018;63(18):1783-802. [15] Cui X, Li Y, Li Y, Qiu B, Duan Q. Water-soluble sulfonate porphyrin functionalized hyaluronic acid with comb-like structure:Potential photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Dyes Pigments 2019;164:237-43. [16] Yu Z, Sun Q, Pan W, Li N, Tang B. A near-infrared triggered nanophotosensitizer inducing domino effect on mitochondrial reactive oxygen species burst for cancer therapy. Acs Nano 2015;9(11):11064-74. [17] Modicanapolitano J, Weissig V. Treatment strategies that enhance the efficacy and selectivity of mitochondria-targeted anticancer agents. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16(8):17394-421. [18] Liu H W, Xu S, Wang P, Hu X X, Zhang J, Yuan L, et al. An efficient two-photon fluorescent probe for monitoring mitochondrial singlet oxygen in tissues during photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun 2016;52:12330-3. [19] Rui L, Xue Y, Wang Y, Gao Y, Zhang W. A mitochondria-targeting supramolecular photosensitizer based on pillararene for photodynamic therapy. Chem Commun 2017;53(21):3126-9. [20] Yang M, Deng J, Guo D, Sun Q, Wang Z, Wang K, et al. Mitochondria-targeting Pt/Mn porphyrins as efficient photosensitizers for magnetic resonance imaging and photodynamic therapy. Dyes Pigments 2019;166:189-95. [21] Huang H, Long S, Li M, Gao F, Du J, Fan J, et al. Bromo-pentamethine as mitochondria-targeted photosensitizers for cancer cell apoptosis with high efficiency. Dyes Pigments 2018;149:633-8. [22] Gorbe M, Costero A M, Sancenón F, Martínez-Máñez R, Ballesteros-Cillero R, Ochando L E, et al. Halogen-containing BODIPY derivatives for photodynamic therapy. Dyes Pigments 2019;160:198-207. [23] Suzuki K, Kobayashi A, Kaneko S, Takehira K, Yoshihara T, Ishida H, et al. Reevaluation of absolute lumi14
nescence quantum yields of standard solutions using a spectrometer with an integrating sphere and a back-thinned CCD detector. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2009;11(42):9850-60. [24] Cunningham C W, Mukhopadhyay A, Lushington G H, Blagg B S J, Prisinzano T E, Krise J P. Uptake, Distribution and Diffusivity of Reactive Fluorophores in Cells:Implications toward Target Identification. Mol Pharmaceut 2010;7(4):1301-10. [25] Jung H S, Han J, Shi H, Koo S, Singh H, Kim H, et al. Overcoming the Limits of Hypoxia in Photodynamic Therapy:A Carbonic Anhydrase IX-Targeted Approach. J Am Chem Soc 2017;139(22):7595-602. [26] Yaroslav Prostota O D K L. New unsymmetrical squaraine dyes derived from imidazo[1,5-a]pyridine. Dyes Pigments 2013;2(96):554-62. [27] Huang L, Li Z, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Wu S, Zhao J, et al. Ultralow-Power Near Infrared Lamp Light Operable Targeted Organic Nanoparticle Photodynamic Therapy. J Am Chem Soc 2016;138(44):14586-91. [28] Huang L, Zhao J, Guo S, Zhang C, Ma J. Bodipy Derivatives as Organic Triplet Photosensitizers for Aerobic Photoorganocatalytic Oxidative Coupling of Amines and Photooxidation of Dihydroxylnaphthalenes. J Org Chem 2013;78:5627-37. [29] Huang H, Zhang P, Yu B, Jin C, Ji L, Chao H. Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of mixed-ligand ruthenium(II) complexes for photodynamic therapy. Dalton T 2015;44(17335-45. [30] Chen Y, Qiao L, Ji L, Chao H. Phosphorescent iridium(III) complexes as multicolor probes for specific mitochondrial imaging and tracking. Biomaterials 2014;35(1):2-13. [31] Jiang J, Qian Y, Xu Z, Lv Z, Tao P, Xie M, et al. Enhancing singlet oxygen generation in semiconducting polymer nanoparticles through fluorescence resonance energy transfer for tumor treatment. Chem Sci 2019;10:5085-94. [32] Swaminathan S, Fowley C, Thapaliya E R, McCaughan B, Tang S, Fraix A, et al. Supramolecular nanoreactors for intracellular singlet-oxygen sensitization. Nanoscale 2015;7(33):14071-9. [33] Jacques S L. Optical properties of biological tissues:a review. Phys Med Biol 2013;58(11):37-61. [34] Ethirajan M, Chen Y, Joshi P, Pandey R K. The role of porphyrin chemistry in tumor imaging and photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev 2011;40(1):340-62. [35] Jung H S, Lee J, Kim K, Koo S, Verwilst P, Sessler J L, et al. A Mitochondria-Targeted Cryptocyanine-Based Photothermogenic Photosensitizer. J Am Chem Soc 2017;139(29):9972-8. [36] Halasi M, Wang M, Chavan T S, Gaponenko V, Hay N, Gartel A L. ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine antagonizes the activity of proteasome inhibitors. Biochem J 2013;454(2):201-8.
Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Highlight 1.
This paper firstly used aza-indole to modify pentamethine dyes to facilitate a large bathochromatic shift of the absorption maximum from 650 nm to 730 nm in the photo-therapeutic window.
2.
Bromine atom has been introduced at 5-position of the aza-indole to increase the ability of inter-system crossing of BY-Br to produce more ROS.
3.
The introduction of the bromine atom also increases its molar extinction coefficient, allowing PS to absorb more light to enhance its therapeutic effect.
4.
BY-Br can localize in mitochondria, and efficiently kill cancer cell by generation ROS in cells.