Non-Equilibrium Behavior on Pulsed Laser Evaporated Surfaces

Non-Equilibrium Behavior on Pulsed Laser Evaporated Surfaces

Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 29 (1983) 147-153 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlan...

458KB Sizes 1 Downloads 72 Views

Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 29 (1983) 147-153 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands

147

NON-EQUILIBRIUM BEHAVIOR ON PULSED LASER EVAPORATED SURFACES L. Lynds and B. A. Woody United Technologies Research Center, East Hartford, CT 06108

ABSTRACT Absorption of intense pulsed laser optical fields by metallic surfaces generates dense neutral atomic beams with high average translational energies. Mechanisms explaining this behavior are based on an equilibrium model invoking high temperatures and pressures. We have made experimental observations on yttrium and uranium atomic beams produced from laser evaporated targets which suggest an alternative mechanism involving a non-equilibrium process. INTRODUCTION Intense coherent radiation (~ 10 8 w/cm 2) interacts with metallic surfaces by an indirect process (ref. 1).

Energy is coupled into a localized plasma

which in turn radiatively heats the surface.

The plasma is continuously

nourished by particles presumably in thermal equilibrium with the surface.

In-

vestigations have centered mainly around mechanical damage effects (refs. 1-4), momentum transfer (ref. 5), and deep-core ionization processes (refs. 6, 7). At lower intensities (~ 10 8 watts/cm 2 ) the coupling mechanism changes to a direct process.

Pulsed coherent radiation of solid surfaces generates a dense

neutral atomic or molecular beam with kinetic energies up to 10 eV (refs. 8-10). Mass beam kinetic energies appear to track the photon intensity within the specified range.

An equilibrium model of the process would suggest that ex-

tremely high "surface" temperatures are achieved. The emphasis in this work was on characterizing the energetics of pulse laser generated uranium and yttrium neutral beams with regard to kinetic energy and distribution of internal energy.

Mass pulses were interrogated with

high resolution cw dye lasers and a quadrupole mass filter to obtain quantitative information on species, number densities and lifetimes.

We report some

preliminary results which suggest that the coupling of pulsed coherent radiation into metallic surfaces can lead to a non-equilibrium vaporization process. 0368·2048/83/0000-0000/$03.00 © 1983 Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company

148

EXPERIMENTAL Pulsed laser evaporization experiments with uranium and yttrium were performed in a stainless-steel chamber illustrated schematically in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Beam-Gas and Crossed-Beam Apparatus

Components are located on a railing so that they can be adjusted relative to optical windows.

The metal target (M) is secured inside a cylindrical housing

which can be rotated externally to maintain the focal plane on the surface and minimize geometrical effects imposed by removal of metal.

Pulsed Nd:YAG

(1064 nm) radiation is focused onto the surface at an angle of 15° to the target normal. A flow of gas (Ar) around the target, as indicated in Fig. 1, restrains the expansion of the atomic beam and forms a column having a diameter of 1-2 cm throughout the optical interrogation region.

In addition, the gas

flow thermalizes the atoms and lengthens the mass pulse from 120

~s

to 5-10 ms.

Atomic flow velocities were measured by resonance fluorescence Doppler shifts and by time of flight techniques:

1) two beam optical absorption with accompa-

nying Ar flow, and 2) mass quadrupole filter at low background pressures ~ 10- 3 Torr. Laser parameters and atom pulse characteristics for the gas flow experiments are summarized in Table 1.

In preliminary experiments parallel

plates were placed in the chamber to measure electron and ion currents. and electrons densities were approximately 10- 5 of neutral species.

Ion

Optical pumping and probing of the atomic pulses was performed orthogonally to' the flow axis with two tunable narrowband cw dye lasers (Coherent, Inc. Model 599-21).

A schematic representation of the optical measurement scheme

is illustrated in Fig. 2.

Pump and probe beams were parallel with a variable

149

TABLE 1 Source Conditions and Results Nd:YAG Laser Pulse Width (FWHM) Rep rate Wavelength Energy

Fig. 2.

Atom Pulse Conditi ons Width (FWHM) Rep rate

120 )JS 10 s-l 1064 nm 0.4 - 1.0 J

Pressure Dens ity Temperature Velocity

5 - 10 ms 10 s~ 1 0.7 - 1.~4Torr 1013_10- cm- 3 300 ~ 400 OK 7000 ern s-l

Experimental Arrangement

separation capability up to 5 cm.

Heterodyne experiments indicated that the jitter-limited linewidths were ~ 5 MHz (0.0002 cm- l). Atomic uranium is optically pumped via the 5L~ (ground state) ~ 7M7 transition as shown in Fig. 3. The short-lived 7M7 state (T = 205 ~ 20 ns, ref. 11) radiative1y populates the low energy odd-level the lower electronic manifold.

5 0

5 0

50.

K L and H states Vla cascades through 6, 3 6 In this work absorption measurements were per-

formed with the long-lived 5L~ and 5H~ states as the lower levels.

Ground

state populations are obtained from 5L~ ~ 7M7 absorption measurements. The optical pumping/probing scheme for atomic yttrium is depicted in Fig. 4 and involves the resonant transition 203/2 ~ 20~/2 at 16131 cm- l which radiatively populates the 4FJ states via cascades through the lower electronic manifold.

150

J!(8)

22000 I-

f

20000

18000 E 18000

" iii

8000

4000

2000

f-l f-

(4)

598.81 nm

30000

f 20000 E " iii

17)

I-

~

ff--

Fig. 3.

597.83 nm (3)

(7)

10000

],

( 5 ) - (8)

591.154 nm

Uranium Probe Transitions

Fig. 4. Scheme

Yttrium Optical Pump-Probe

These metastable quartet states are individually probed using the upper states as terminal levels.

G3

Narrow line absorption measurements of the Doppler

broadened transitions provided a direct determination of the average number density within the probing volume.

Analysis of the lineshapes indicated that

the translational temperature for U and Y in admixture with Ar was in the range of 300-500oK. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Under the specified flow conditions, optical pumping produced easily detectable populations of U and Y metastables. Tables II and III.

Typical results are presented in

Downstream probing indicated that the metastable states had

Table II Uranium Metastable Populations 5Lo -+ 7M 6 7 Probe Pump power (mw) (nm) 20

597.632

10

Level

%Abs

5Lo 6

5.38 4.43

2

3.19

0.1

0.35

20

598.610

3.2

5Ho 3

2

7.73 6.68

0.63 0.1

11.4

591.540

5Lo 6

2.34

atoms cm- 3 1.85 x 1010 10 1. 51 x 10 10 1.08 x 10 9 1.2 x 10 1.44 x

ic"

10 9.37 x 10 10 8.05 x 10 10 2.76 x 10 5.9 x lOll

151

TABLE III Y Metastable Populations Pump -1 transition (cm ) 2

2

0

D3/ 2 -.. D3/ 2

Probe -1 transition (cm )

Population (atoms cm- 3 ) 12 9.35 x 10

16131 4 F3/2 4 F5/ 2 4 F7/ 2 4 F9/2

4 0 -.. G5/ 2 4 0 -.. G5/ 2 4 0 -.. G7/ 2 4 0 -.. G9/ 2

10

17757

4.68 x 10

17615

1 .87

17708

3.27 x lOll

17832

ri.d.

x lOll

lifetimes greater than several milliseconds in the presence of argon as a collision partner. Experiments indicated that our sensitivity limit was approx9 imately 10 atoms/cm 3 for absorption processes and perhaps 107 atoms/cm 3 with laser induced fluorescence.

However, the latter procedure does not easily yield

quantitative measurements. In the absence of optical pumping, the atomic pulses show no sign of metastable population in response to probing along the flow axis. (~10

-3

At low pressures

Torr) focused 0.4-1.0 J pulses generated maximum ground state popula-

tions with kinetic energies of 3-5 eV for U and 10-12 eV for Y.

Energy cen-

troids generally increase with laser intensity in the "averaged" intensity 2 regime of 1-10 MW/cm and are consistent with results obtained earlier by Friichtenicht (ref. 8) and Levine (ref. 12).

Equivalent equilibrium temperatures at the surface are in the range of ~ 3.5 x 104 -.. 1.4 x 105 oK. Boltzmann

distribution at the melting, boiling and intermediate temperatures for states probed in this work are presented in Table IV. If evaporation were an equilibrium process, one would expect to find significant fractions of metastable states and ions.

This appears to be in sharp contrast to our observations on

thermal equilibrium source ovens and to the proposed mechanisms involving the subsurface explosions of bubbles containing gaseous atoms at high pressures and temperatures (refs. 3, 4, 10). It has been demonstrated that Nd:YAG radiation at intensity levels between 8 7 10 and 6 x 10 w/cm 2 is efficiently coupled into metal targets (refs. 13, 14). Extrapolating these results to the uranium targets used in this work, we compared the number of atoms available from the laser pulse energy to the number

152

TABLE IV Bo ltzmann distribution of states No. density (atoms cm -3 ) nu n1

Upper Level

U

Term

E(cm -1 )

T ( OK)

5 Ho 3

3868.486

300 * 1405 2273 ** 4407

U

\0

7

3800.829

300 * 1405 2273 ** 4407

Y

4 F5/2

11078.61

* 1795 ** 3611

* Melting point data

nu/nl 8 1.3 x 102 LOx 102 4.7 x 101 1.5 x 10-

5 1.3 x 10 12 4.3 x 10

8.9 x 1013

8 1.4 x 102 2.4 x 101 1.0 x 101 3.3 x 10-

5 3.1 x 10 12 9.7 x 10

7 1.3 x 10 13 8.3 x 10

4 2.1 x 102 1.8 x 10-

10 1.3 x 10 17 4.1 x 10

6 x 1013 19 2.3 x 10

7 1.3 x 10

** Boiling point data

in a typical mass pulse based on absorption measurements. Assuming an irrotational fluid field the equation of continuity is expressed as: \J •

(p(t)v) = d~~t)

(1 )

where p(t) is the time evolved density of the atomic ground state and v is an average flow velocity. Assuming a simple rectangular pulse function, the pulse 16 17 17 contained 10 to 10 atoms compared to 5 x 10 atoms calculated from laser pulse energy and the solid heat of vaporization.

Conversion of energy to

neutral atoms appears to be a relatively efficient process in agreement with other observations. A crude calculation shows that there are n

=5

20 x 1018 ~ 10 photons per

pulse and that the ratio of photons to a single surface atom is approximately 2 in the range of (4 x 10- - 1) during one period of the lattice vibration. The photon dynamics suggests that adiabatic multiphoton excitation of surface vibrational modes with energy-pooling may account for the anomolous behavior of the energy distribution in pulse evaporated atomic beams.

Of course, this mechanism

is higly speculative particularly in view of the work of Yen, et al. (ref. 15) which reports that the electron-phonon energy relaxation is less than 1 ps in metallic zirconium.

153

In summary, the distribution of population in the metastable states carries a partial history of dynamical processes occurring on the surfaces during dissociation in the presence of large optical fields.

In dramatic contrast

to thermal oven atomic sources, the laser vaporized atoms appear in their ground electronic states with high densities and high kinetic energies.

Within

the sensitivity of absorption measurements and LIF detection, long-lived metastable states were not observed.

We determined that the metastable states

resulting from optical pumping could survive in the environment and over the distances of the measurements. radiate below 800 nm.

In addition, dimers were observed but did not

These observations provide an alternative view for the

coupling of coherent pulsed radiation into surfaces.

REFERENCES 1.

J. F. Ready, 3, 11 (1963); Effects of High-Power Laser Radiation

(Academic, New York, London, 1971). C. DeMichelis, IEEE J. Quantum Electron, QE-6, 630 (1970). F. W. Dabby and U. C. Park, IEEE J. Quantum Electron, QE-8, 106 (1972). F. P. Gagliano and U. C. Park, Appl. Opt. 13, 274 (197~ S. A. Metz, Appl. Phys. l.et t . , g, 211 (1973). A. Caruso, B. Bertotti and P. Guipponi, Nuovo Cimento 45B, 176 (1966). A. Caruso and F. Gratton, Plasma Physics 10, 867 (1968--).-J. F. Friichtenicht, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 45, 51 (1974). S. P. Tang, N. G. Utterback and J. F. Friichtenicht, J. Chem. Phys. §!, 3833 (1976). 10. N. G. Utterback, S. P. Tang and J. F. Friichtenicht, Phys. Fluids ~' 900 (1976). 11. E. Miron, R. David, G. Erez, S. Lavi and L. A. Levin, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 256 (1979). 12. L. P. Levine, J. F. Ready, and E. Bernal, IEEE, J. Quantum Electron. QE-4, 18 (1968). 13. M. von Allmen, J. Appl. Phys., 1L, 5460 (1976). 14. M. von Allmen, P. Blaser, K. Affolter and E. Sturmer, IEEE J. Quant. Electron, ~' 85 (1978).. 15. R. Yen, J. M. Liu, N. Bloembergen, J. K. Yee, J. G. Fuzimoto and M. ~1. Salour, Appl. Phys. Lett., 40, 185 (1982).

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.