Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein

Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein

Accepted Manuscript Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein Dimitra Dimitrellou, Panagiotis Kandylis, Yiannis Kourkoutas, ...

662KB Sizes 54 Downloads 424 Views

Accepted Manuscript Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein Dimitra Dimitrellou, Panagiotis Kandylis, Yiannis Kourkoutas, Maria Kanellaki PII:

S0023-6438(17)30598-4

DOI:

10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.028

Reference:

YFSTL 6450

To appear in:

LWT - Food Science and Technology

Received Date: 27 November 2016 Revised Date:

14 July 2017

Accepted Date: 9 August 2017

Please cite this article as: Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., Kourkoutas, Y., Kanellaki, M., Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on casein, LWT - Food Science and Technology (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.028. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1

Novel probiotic whey cheese with immobilized lactobacilli on

2

casein

RI PT

3

5

SC

Short title: Probiotic whey cheese with lactobacilli

4

Dimitra Dimitrellou1,2*, Panagiotis Kandylis1,2, Yiannis Kourkoutas1, Maria

7

Kanellaki2

M AN U

6

1

8

Applied Microbiology and Molecular Biology Research Group, Department of Molecular

9

Biology and Genetics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, 68100, Greece 2

Food Biotechnology Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Patras, Patra

11

TE D

10

26500, Greece

12

*

13

E-mail.:[email protected]

EP

AC C

14

Corresponding author. Dr. Dimitra Dimitrellou; Tel.: +306946489978.

1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT

16

In the present study, the use of thermally-dried immobilized lactobacilli (Lactobacillus casei

17

ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus ATCC 11842) on casein was evaluated

18

for the production of a novel dried whey cheese. Cheeses with thermally-dried free

19

lactobacilli cells and with no starter culture were also produced, for comparison reasons.

20

The main physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of a novel whey cheese were

21

determined during ripening at 20oC until day 60. The results clearly demonstrated that the

22

use of free and immobilized on casein L. casei and L. bulgaricus positively affected the

23

production of dried whey cheeses. More specifically, their use led to novel whey cheeses

24

with improved quality, as resulted by sensory evaluation and SPME GC/MS analysis of

25

aroma, extended preservation time and protection from spoilage and pathogens. Whey

26

cheeses microbiota was dominated by lactobacilli and mesophilic and thermophilic

27

lactococci. Counts of coliforms, enterobacteria and staphylococci were significantly reduced

28

in whey cheese produced with thermally-dried lactobacilli cultures. The use of cultures, like

29

those proposed in the present study, may have a great potential in dairy technology for the

30

conversion of low quality whey cheeses to novel probiotic foods with improved

31

characteristics.

33 34

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

32

RI PT

15

Keywords: L. casei, L. bulgaricus, thermal drying, GC/MS

2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1. Introduction

36

Cheese whey is the liquid waste of the dairy industry remaining after milk coagulation and

37

removal of the curd during cheese production. Cheese production is continuously increasing

38

with a rate of 2% per year and therefore large quantities of whey, approximately 120 million

39

tons per year, are also produced representing a serious environmental problem

40

(Kaminarides, 2015). Whey utilization is constantly increasing and currently about 50% of

41

total whey produced is transformed into value-added products such as whey powder, whey

42

protein, biofuels, biopolymers, electricity, single cell protein, probiotic dairy products,

43

prebiotics, ethanol etc (Dimitrellou, Kourkoutas, Koutinas, & Kanellaki, 2009; Dimitrellou,

44

Kourkoutas, Banat, Marchant, & Koutinas, 2007; Koutinas et al., 2009; Prazeres, Carvalho, &

45

Rivas, 2012; Sen, Bhattacharjee, & Bhattacharya, 2016; Yadav et al., 2014). However, large

46

volumes of whey still remain untreated and are discarded in the environment. The chemical

47

composition of whey differs according to the types of cheese produced and especially the

48

kind of milk used for cheese production. In fact, cheese whey contains water 93-94%, lactose

49

4.5-6.0%, proteins 0.6-1.1%, minerals 0.8-1.0%, lactic acid 0.05-0.9% and fats 0.06-0.5%

50

(Prazeres et al., 2012).

51

Traditionally, in the Mediterranean region a large portion of whey is used for the production

52

of whey cheeses (Pintado & Malcata, 2000). The production of whey cheeses is based on

53

thermal (above 85oC) denaturation and coagulation of the water soluble milk proteins

54

present in whey (a-lactalbumin and b-lactoglobulin). Of all Greek whey cheeses, Myzithra, a

55

soft cheese produced from the whey of Feta cheese or hard cheeses, such as Kefalotyri and

56

Graviera, is produced in the largest quantity (Kaminarides, 2015). In the market, two types of

57

Myzithra are available: fresh Myzithra, with fat content in dry matter of about 50% and a

58

moisture content that is not greater than 70%, but with limited shelf life and dry Myzithra,

59

with the same fat content in dry matter and a moisture content that is not greater than 40%

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

35

3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Anifantakis, 1991). Due to the nature of their production at high temperatures, no culture is

61

added in whey cheeses and therefore they are susceptible to spoilage.

62

Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 is a strain with satisfying technological characteristics and

63

therefore has numerous applications in the production of food products, such as cheese

64

(Dimitrellou, Kandylis, Sidira, Koutinas, & Kourkoutas, 2014a), sausages (Sidira, Dimitrellou,

65

Kanellaki, & Kourkoutas, 2010a), bread (Plessas et al., 2007), fermented milks (Dimitrellou et

66

al., 2016a) and yogurts (Dimitrellou, Kandylis, & Kourkoutas, 2014b). In addition, recent

67

studies have demonstrated that L. casei ATCC 393 has beneficial probiotic effects, such as

68

removal of cholesterol (Lye, Rusul, & Liong, 2010), reduction of osteoporosis risk (Kim et al.,

69

2009), tumor-inhibitory, anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects (Tiptiri-Kourpeti et al.,

70

2016). On the other hand, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus is widely used in yogurt

71

production in combination with Streptococcus thermophilus. More specifically, L. bulgaricus

72

ATCC 11842 is a strain that has been used in the production of several foods like bread

73

(Plessas et al., 2008) and cheese (Katechaki, Solomonidis, Bekatorou, & Koutinas, 2010).

74

Moreover, this strain has presented anti-bacterial and anti-adherence effects against

75

Escherichia coli in vitro (Abedi, Akbari, & Jafarian-Dehkordi, 2013).

76

It is well established that cell immobilization enhances the viability of cultures during food

77

production, processing, storage and simulated gastrointestinal conditions (Dimitrellou et al.,

78

2016a; Dimitrellou, Kandylis, & Kourkoutas, 2016b). Milk proteins are characterized as

79

natural vehicles for the delivery of bioactives, including probiotics, due to their structural

80

and physicochemical properties (Livney, 2010). Milk proteins have been used for

81

microencapsulation and delivery of bioactive compounds and probiotics (Anal & Singh, 2007;

82

Chen & Subirade, 2006; Hébrard et al., 2006; Heidebach, Först, & Kulozik, 2009).

83

Furthermore, casein and whey proteins have been used successfully as immobilization

84

support of probiotic cells for the production of several dairy products (Dimitrellou et al.,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

60

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2016b; Dimitrellou, Kandylis, Kourkoutas, Koutinas, & Kanellaki, 2015; Dimitrellou et al.,

86

2014b; Dimitrellou et al., 2009; Sidira et al., 2017).

87

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of producing a novel whey

88

cheese, with extended shelf life, using probiotic lactobacilli immobilized on casein in its

89

production. The immobilized cells were thermally dried aiming to produce a more stable and

90

ready to use product, complying with the industrial needs, but with low cost. The effect of

91

lactobacilli on physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of novel whey cheeses

92

was evaluated along with the profile of major volatile compounds which are responsible for

93

the aroma of new products.

M AN U

94

SC

RI PT

85

2. Materials and methods

96

2.1 Strains

97

Probiotic cultures of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp.

98

bulgaricus ATCC 11842 (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) were grown at 37°C for 72 h on de

99

Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland).

EP

TE D

95

2.2 Cell immobilization on casein

101

For cell immobilization (Dimitrellou et al., 2015), 3 g (wet weight) of either Lactobacillus

102

casei ATCC 393 or Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 were added to 1.5 L

103

of commercial pasteurized bovine milk (0% fat). The mixture was heated to 37oC,

104

commercial rennet (0.01%) was added, and left undisturbed for 1 h for casein precipitation.

105

Subsequently, the curd was cut in cubes (acme ≈1 cm), left undisturbed for 10 min and was

106

then cloth filtered at room temperature (18–22oC). Casein-supported biocatalyst was

107

thermally-dried prior use.

AC C

100

5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.3 Thermal-drying procedure

109

Casein-supported biocatalysts and free cultures were dried in a chamber equipped with air

110

circulation (J.P. Selecta, Spain) at 38oC until constant weight (≈24 h) (Dimitrellou et al.,

111

2008).

112

2.4 Novel dried whey cheese production

113

Fresh whey cheese was provided by a local dairy industry (AVIGAL S.A. Valmantoura, Achaia,

114

Greece) and produced using sweet whey derived after Feta-cheese production. Ewe’s milk

115

(2.3%) and salt (0.3%) were added in the whey and the mixture was heated to 95oC for 10-15

116

min until coagulation and the coagulant was then cloth filtered. The thermally-dried cultures

117

were suspended in whey for 2 h at 30oC prior to incorporation into the cheese curd.

118

Specifically, for the production of dried whey cheese using thermally-dried immobilized cells

119

on casein (ILC and ILB), 75 g of thermally-dried immobilized cells were homogenized with

120

100 mL whey and mixed with the cheese curd (1500 g) during cloth filtration, while for

121

production of dried whey cheese using thermally-dried free cells (FLC and FLB), 45 ml of

122

whey containing 4.5 g of thermally dried free cells were sprayed at cheese curd (1500 g)

123

during cloth filtration (Dimitrellou et al., 2009). The produced cheese samples were ripened

124

at 20oC (relative humidity 61%) and ripening was monitored for up to 60 days. Traditional

125

dried whey cheese without culture (C) was also produced in order to allow comparison of

126

results. All treatments were carried out in triplicate and the mean values are presented.

127

Duplicate samples from each treatment were collected at various intervals (1, 4, 15, 30, 45

128

and 60 days) and were subjected to physicochemical and microbiological analysis.

129

2.5 Physicochemical analysis

130

Cheese samples (20 g each) were macerated with warm water (40°C) to produce a total

131

volume of 210 mL. Each sample was then filtered and the filtrate was used for lactic acid,

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

108

6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ethanol, and residual sugar determination (AOAC International, 1995). Moisture content, ash

133

content, and acidity (expressed as lactic acid) of cheese samples were determined according

134

to AOAC International (1995). Residual sugar (lactose, glucose, and galactose) were

135

determined using HPLC, as described previously (Dimitrellou et al., 2009). All analyses were

136

carried out in triplicate and the mean data are presented.

137

2.6 Solid-Phase Microextraction GC-MS Analysis

138

Cheese samples ripened for 60 days were used to study the volatile composition by solid-

139

phase microextraction (SPME) GC-MS analysis. The procedure described in a previous study

140

(Dimitrellou et al., 2009) was followed. More specifically semi-quantification of volatile

141

compounds was carried out using methyl octanoate (Sigma–Aldrich, Poole, UK) diluted in

142

pure hexane as an internal standard (IS) at various concentrations (1.25, 12.5, 125 and 1250

143

mg/kg of cheese). The volatile compounds were semi-quantified by dividing the peak areas

144

of the compounds of interest by the peak area of the IS and multiplying this ratio by the

145

initial concentration of the IS (expressed as mg/kg). The peak areas were measured from the

146

full scan chromatograph using total ion current (TIC). Identification was carried out by

147

comparing the retention times and mass spectra of volatiles to those of authentic

148

compounds generated in the laboratory, by mass spectra obtained from NIST107, NIST21,

149

and SZTERP libraries [CLASS 5000 software of GC-17A/QP-5050A (GC-MS); Shimadzu Corp.,

150

Kyoto, Japan], and by determining Kovats’ retention indices and comparing them with those

151

reported in the literature (Bianchi, Careri, Mangia, & Musci, 2007; Dimitrellou et al., 2015;

152

Dimitrellou et al., 2009; Kandylis, Drouza, Bekatorou, & Koutinas, 2010). Each determination

153

was carried out in triplicate and the mean data are presented.

154

2.7. Microbiological analyses

155

Microbiological analysis was carried out as described previously (Dimitrellou et al., 2009).

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

132

7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2.8. Sensory evaluation of whey cheeses

157

The novel dried whey cheeses produced with thermally dried free and immobilized cultures

158

and without culture were tested for their sensory characteristics, as described in a previous

159

study (Dimitrellou et al., 2009).

160

2.9. Statistical analysis

161

All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Significance was established at P < 0.05. The

162

results were analyzed for statistical significance with ANOVA, and Tukey honest significant

163

difference (HSD) test was used to determine significant differences between the results;

164

coefficients, ANOVA tables, and significance (P < 0.05) were computed using Statistica

165

version 5.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK).

166

M AN U

SC

RI PT

156

3. Results and discussion

168

3.1. Production of novel probiotic whey cheeses with immobilized L. casei and L.

169

bulgaricus on casein

170

Whey cheeses were produced using the traditional method of a local dairy industry. Since

171

traditionally whey cheeses are produced without any starter culture, the selection of

172

potential probiotic cultures is a very crucial step. Therefore, in the present study, two strains

173

with numerous applications in dairy products, namely L. casei ATCC 393 and L. bulgaricus

174

ATCC 11842, were used as potential probiotic strains. Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 was

175

selected based also on its capability to survive the harsh conditions of the GI tract as was

176

proved both by in vitro, using simulated GI conditions (Dimitrellou et al., 2016a), and in vivo

177

studies, using Wistar rats (Sidira et al., 2010b). Casein was selected as immobilization

178

support, since milk proteins act as buffering agents in vivo, protecting bacterial strains at GI

AC C

EP

TE D

167

8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT tract (Charteris, Kelly, Morelli, & Collins, 1998). Furthermore, both strains were used in dried

180

form in order to be in accordance to the industrial needs for ready to use cultures that will

181

be also capable to be stored for a short period. Indeed, previous studies have proved that

182

both strains are capable to survive the harsh conditions during drying either in free or

183

immobilized form (Dimitrellou et al., 2016a; Dimitrellou et al., 2016b; Koutinas et al., 2009).

184

Whey cheeses without culture using the traditional method were also produced for

185

comparison reasons.

186

3.2. Physicochemical characteristics of novel probiotic whey cheeses

187

The results concerning the effect of the thermally dried immobilized and free lactobacilli on

188

the physicochemical characteristics of dried whey cheese during ripening are summarized in

189

Table 1. The thermally dried cultures, cell immobilization and ripening time affected

190

significantly (P<0.05) all parameters analyzed apart from glucose/galactose, moisture and

191

ash content, which were affected significantly (P<0.05) only by the ripening time.

192

In general, lactose content was significantly (P<0.05) lower in whey cheese sample produced

193

with either free or immobilized lactobacilli compared to traditional whey cheese. This trend

194

was expected due to the presence of culture during ripening. No significant differences were

195

observed in the case of sugars between whey cheeses with L. casei and L. bulgaricus either

196

in free or immobilized form and these values were similar to those in previous studies with

197

dried whey cheese using kefir culture (Dimitrellou et al., 2009). In the case of pH, traditional

198

dried whey cheese produced without any culture presented values similar to other dried

199

whey cheeses like “Urda” (Pappa, Samelis, Kondyli, & Pappas, 2016), but in all cases, these

200

values were significant higher than those of whey cheeses produced with lactobacilli. As a

201

consequence, the acidity of cheeses without culture was significant lower than in cheeses

202

with lactobacilli. In addition, the use of immobilized cells resulted in significant higher values

203

of acidity compare to cheeses with free cells of lactobacilli. The same trend was observed

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

179

9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT when dried whey cheeses were produced with free and immobilized kefir culture

205

(Dimitrellou et al., 2009). This is probably due to the improved adaption of immobilized cells

206

and higher fermentative activity. Moisture content was not affected by the use of cultures,

207

but was significantly (P<0.05) reduced during ripening and therefore the ash content was

208

significantly (P<0.05) increased, especially from day 1 to 4 due to salting of the cheeses. The

209

moisture content of cheeses of the present study was similar to a previous study with kefir

210

culture (Dimitrellou et al., 2009), but significant higher compared to “Urda”, another dried

211

whey cheese (Pappa et al., 2016). The different technological parameters may explain the

212

observed differences.

213

3.3. Microbiological analysis of novel probiotic whey cheeses

214

The association of the microbial groups examined during ripening of the novel dried whey

215

cheeses is presented in Tables 2 and 3. Due to the production process of whey cheeses that

216

requires high temperatures above 85oC, these cheeses are practically free of bacteria after

217

production (Pintado & Malcata,2000). However, handling of cheese curd after production

218

and the equipment are responsible for cross-contamination with many microorganisms

219

(Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, Tzanetakis, & Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, 1994; Lioliou, Litopoulou-

220

Tzanetaki, Tzanetakis, & Robinson, 2001; Pintado & Malcata, 2000). In the present study, the

221

numbers of lactobacilli were significant higher in the case of whey cheeses with free or

222

immobilized L. casei and L. bulgaricus, as expected, Of note, their numbers also increased

223

significantly in the case of traditional whey cheeses without cultures, as observed in other

224

whey cheeses (Papaioannou, Chouliara, Karatapanis, Kontominas, & Savvaidis, 2007; Pappa

225

et al., 2016). No significant differences were observed in the numbers of mesophilic and

226

thermophilic lactococci among all whey cheeses of the present study. Their presence in

227

cheeses is due to non starter lactic acid bacteria and cross-contamination after cheese

228

production. A reduction in their numbers at the end of ripening may be attributed to the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

204

10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT high salt and low moisture content (Psoni, Tzanetakis, & Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, 2006). The

230

high numbers of yeast at the first day of ripening in all cheeses (≈ 5 log cfu/g) is probably due

231

to contaminations from cheese making equipment and environment (Viljoen, 2001).

232

However, their numbers were reduced during ripening, in accordance to results previously

233

published concerning “Urda” cheese (Pappa et al., 2016). This reduction was more rapid in

234

the case of whey cheeses with free or immobilized L. casei and L. bulgaricus. The numbers of

235

coliforms, enterobacteria and staphylococci were increased during ripening and after the

236

15th day a reduction was observed. In cheeses with lactobacilli their numbers at the end of

237

ripening were significant (P<0.05) lower compared to traditional whey cheese with no

238

culture. This may be attributed to the lower pH values, lower moisture content and higher

239

acidity that do not favor their growth. The significantly (P<0.05) reduced numbers of

240

coliforms, staphylococci and enterobacteria in dried whey cheeses produced with free or

241

immobilized L. casei and L. bulgaricus compared to cheeses without culture and to other

242

whey (Dimitrellou et al., 2009; Kalogridou-Vassiliadou et al., 1994), other Greek (Gerasi,

243

Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, & Tzanetakis, 2003; Hatzikamari, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, & Tzanetakis,

244

1999; Nikolaou, Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, Tzanetakis, & Robinson, 2002) and Portuguese (Pinho

245

et al., 2004) cheeses, suggested the development of microbial association, leading to

246

repression of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Although pathogenesis or spoilage has not

247

been reported for all staphylococci (Kourkoutas et al., 2006) and coliforms should not be

248

associated with pathogens (Trmčić et al., 2016), the reduction in their numbers is a very

249

important observation for the production process and sensorial characteristics of the novel

250

whey cheeses.

251

In order to evaluate the effect of lactobacilli on preservation of novel dried whey cheeses, all

252

cheeses left at 20oC without packaging until spoilage was observed on their surface. More

253

specifically, sparse surface greenish spots were observed in traditional dried whey cheeses

254

after 27 days of ripening, while in novel whey cheeses produced with free L. casei and L.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

229

11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT bulgaricus after 42 and 43 days, respectively. The use of immobilized cells further increased

256

the preservation time of cheeses with spoilage observed after 51-52 days. Similar significant

257

(P<0.05) increase of the preservation time of whey cheeses as was also observed in the case

258

of dried whey cheeses with kefir culture (Dimitrellou et al., 2009). The spots were probably

259

molds, which are often observed in the surface of dried whey cheeses during ripening, but

260

they are commonly harmless. It is a usual practice to remove them, by cutting at least ¼ inch

261

beneath the mold before consumption or packaging (Zerfiridis, 2001).

262

3.4. Aroma related compounds of novel probiotic whey cheeses

263

Whey cheese samples produced with L. casei and L. bulgaricus, either in free (FLC and FLB)

264

or immobilized form (ILC and ILB), were analyzed using SPME GC/MS technique and

265

compared to whey cheeses produced with no starter culture (C) in order to evaluate the

266

effect of lactobacilli on the production of major volatile compounds. In total, 49 compounds

267

were detected, from which 25 in C sample, 33 in FLC, 25 in FLB, 33 in ILC and 29 in ILB. These

268

compounds included esters, organic acids, alcohols, carbonyl compounds and lactones.

269

Organic acids were the most abundant volatile group isolated in the headspace of whey

270

cheeses (Table 4), which is in accordance with the results of a previous study concerning

271

dried whey cheese (Dimitrellou et al., 2009). Indeed, fatty acids have been proved important

272

components of the flavor of many cheese types (Curioni & Bosset, 2002). In general, the

273

content of organic acids was higher in whey cheeses with L. casei and L. bulgaricus and

274

especially in those produced with immobilized cells (ILC and ILB). Τhe acids with the higher

275

concentrations were hexanoic, octanoic and decanoic acid, which were considered as major

276

flavor components of other cheese types, such as aged Cheddar, Grana Padano and Roncal

277

cheese (Curioni & Bosset, 2002). Dodecanoic acid was also detected in high concentrations

278

in all cheeses of the present study. However, it plays a minor role in cheese flavor, due to its

279

low perception threshold. Branched-chain fatty acids, like 2-methyl and 3-methyl butanoic

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

255

12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT acids, detected only in FLC and ILB, are considered important compounds of goat and sheep

281

cheeses, and together contribute to the very-ripened-cheese aroma (Yvon & Rijnen, 2001).

282

Alcohols were the second more abundant volatile group of whey cheeses. The alcohol with

283

the higher concentration detected in all whey cheese samples was phenylethanol. This

284

compound is among the most odorous alcohols with a pleasant rose flower notes (Curioni &

285

Bosset, 2002) originating from phenylalanine through microbial catabolism (Ziino, Condurso,

286

Romeo, Giuffrida, & Verzera, 2005). 3-Methyl-1-butanol, detected in all whey cheeses apart

287

from ILC and ILB, provides a pleasant aroma of fresh cheese and originated from leucine.

288

In total, 12 esters were detected .Seven of them belong to the group of ethyl esters, which

289

are considered important compounds for the flavor of cheeses, being responsible for the

290

fruity character (Curioni & Bosset, 2002). 2-Phenylethyl acetate, detected in all cheeses, is

291

one of the most important flavor ester in cheeses, providing floral and rose-like attributes

292

(Molimard & Spinnler, 1996), especially in Camembert cheese (Kubíčková & Grosch, 1997).

293

The carbonyl compounds detected belong to aldehydes and ketones group. Their

294

concentrations were similar in all whey cheeses, but cheeses with free cells of lactobacilli

295

(FLC and FLB) presented slight higher concentrations. Aldehydes are not present in high

296

concentrations, because they are rapidly reduced to alcohols or oxidized to acids (Curioni &

297

Bosset, 2002). Only two aldehydes were detected in the whey cheeses of the present study,

298

namely 3-methyl butanal and benzaldehyde. Benzaldehyde detected in all cheeses is

299

described as having an odor of bitter almond (Molimard & Splinnler, 1996). 3-Methyl

300

butanal detected only in ILC, probably originates from leucine degradation and has been

301

detected in other cheeses, such as Camambert, aged Cheddar and Feta-type cheese (Curioni

302

& Bosset, 2002; Dimitrellou et al., 2014a). Ketones are common flavor compounds in most

303

dairy products and especially methyl ketones like 2-octanone and 2-undecanone, which are

304

known for their fruity, floral and musty notes, and 2-heptanone for its blue cheese notes

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

280

13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (Curioni & Bosset, 2002). In the present study these methyl ketones were detected in all

306

cheese samples. 3-Hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) was present only in cheeses with

307

lactobacilli and this is attributed to the fact that it originates from citrate metabolism by the

308

action of lactic acid bacteria (McSweeney and Fox, 2004).

309

Lactones are cyclic esters and among them γ- and δ-lactones are considered important

310

compounds for the final aroma of several cheeses, such as Camembert (Curioni & Bosset,

311

2002). They are known to have fruity aromas like peach, apricot and coconut and especially

312

δ-lactones have low threshold limits (Vagenas & Roussis, 2012). In the present study, γ- and

313

δ- decalactone and dodecalactone were detected in almost all whey cheeses. Higher

314

concentrations of lactones were detected in whey cheeses with L. casei (FLC and ILC). This

315

trend was also reported in Feta-type cheeses produced with free or immobilized on whey

316

proteins L. casei cells (Dimitrellou et al., 2014a).

317

The total concentration of each aroma group per whey cheese is summarized in Table 5. In

318

the case of esters, FLC and ILB presented significantly higher (P<0.05) concentrations

319

compared to other whey cheeses. Organic acids was the group with the highest

320

concentrations in all whey cheeses. No significant differences were observed between the

321

control (C) and whey cheeses with L. casei (FLC and ILC), while in the case of whey cheeses

322

with L. bulgaricus (FLB and ILB) their content was significantly (P<0.05) higher. Whey cheeses

323

with L. casei presented significantly higher (P<0.05) concentrations of lactones compared to

324

other whey cheeses. Finally, total concentrations of aroma compounds were higher in

325

cheeses with L. bulgaricus (ILB > FLB) followed by those with L. casei (FLC > ILC) and control

326

whey cheese (C).

327

3.5. Preliminary sensory evaluation of novel whey cheeses

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

305

14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT The whey cheeses produced using thermally dried immobilized and free L. casei or L.

329

bulgaricus were compared with traditional whey cheeses without culture in regard to their

330

sensory characteristics (data not shown). Generally, the use of lactobacilli cultures positively

331

affected the flavor of dried whey cheeses leading to significantly (P<0.05) higher values

332

compared to traditional cheeses. No significant differences were observed between cheeses

333

with free or immobilized cells or between different lactobacilli used.

334

4. Conclusions

335

The results of the present study clearly demonstrated that the use of free and immobilized L.

336

casei and L. bulgaricus on casein positively affected the production of dried whey cheeses.

337

More specifically, their use led to novel whey cheeses with improved quality, as resulted by

338

sensory evaluation and SPME GC/MS analysis of aroma, extended preservation time and

339

protection from spoilage and pathogens. The use of such cultures may have a great potential

340

in dairy technology for the conversion of low quality whey cheeses to novel probiotic foods

341

with improved characteristics. The proposed technology may be adapted to the production

342

of other whey cheeses, as well, while the low cost of thermal drying process is in accordance

343

with the industrial needs for ready to use dried cultures.

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

328

344 REFERENCES

346

Abedi, S. F., Akbari, V., & Jafarian-Dehkordi, D. (2013). In vitro anti-bacterial and anti-

347 348 349

AC C

345

adherence effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus on Escherichia coli. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8(4), 261-268.

Anal, A. K., & Singh, H. (2007). Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for

350

industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends in Food Science and Technology,

351

18(5), 240-251.

15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

353 354 355 356

Anifantakis, E. M. (1991). Greek cheeses: A tradition of centuries. National Dairy Committee of Greece. AOAC International. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. (16th ed.). AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

RI PT

352

Bianchi, F., Careri, M., Mangia, A., & Musci, M. (2007). Retention indices in the analysis of food aroma volatile compounds in temperature-programmed gas chromatography:

358

Database creation and evaluation of precision and robustness. Journal of Separation

359

Science, 30(4), 563-572.

Charteris, W. P., Kelly, P. M., Morelli, L., & Collins, J.K. (1998). Development and application

M AN U

360

SC

357

361

of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic

362

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract.

363

Journal of Applied Microbiology, 84(5), 759-768.

Chen, L., & Subirade, M. (2006). Alginate–whey protein granular microspheres as oral

365

delivery vehicles for bioactive compounds. Biomaterials, 27(26), 4646-4654.

TE D

364

Curioni, P. M. G., & Bosset, J. O. (2002). Key odorants in various cheese types as determined

367

by gas chromatography-olfactometry. International Dairy Journal, 12(12), 959-984.

368

Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2014b). Physicochemical and microbiological

370 371

characteristics of probiotic yogurts produced with immobilized cells. Journal of

AC C

369

EP

366

Biotechnology, 185, S79.

Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2016b). Effect of cooling rate, freeze-drying,

372

and storage on survival of free and immobilized Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393. LWT-Food

373

Science and Technology, 69, 468-473.

16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 374

Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., Kourkoutas, Y., Koutinas, A. A., & Kanellaki, M. (2015). Cheese

375

production using kefir culture entrapped in milk proteins. Applied Biochemistry

376

Biotechnology, 176(1), 213-230.

377

Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., Petrović, T., Dimitrijević-Branković, S., Lević, S., Nedović, V., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2016a). Survival of spray dried microencapsulated Lactobacillus casei

379

ATCC 393 in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and fermented milk. LWT-Food

380

Science and Technology, 71, 169-174.

RI PT

378

Dimitrellou, D., Kandylis, P., Sidira, M., Koutinas, A. A., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2014a). Free and

382

immobilized Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 on whey protein as starter cultures for

383

probiotic Feta-type cheese production. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(8), 4675-4685.

384

Dimitrellou, D., Kourkoutas, Y., Banat, I. M., Marchant, R., & Koutinas, A. A. (2007). Whey-

385

cheese production using freeze-dried kefir culture as a starter. Journal of Applied

386

Microbiology, 103(4), 1170-1183.

M AN U

TE D

387

SC

381

Dimitrellou, D., Kourkoutas, Y., Koutinas, A. A., & Kanellaki, M. (2009). Thermally-dried immobilized kefir on casein as starter culture in dried whey cheese production. Food

389

Microbiology, 26(8), 809-820.

391 392 393

Dimitrellou, D., Tsaousi, K., Kourkoutas, Y., Panas, P., Kanellaki, M., & Koutinas, A. A. (2008). Fermentation efficiency of thermally dried immobilized kefir on casein as starter

AC C

390

EP

388

culture. Process Biochemistry, 43(12), 1323–1329.

Gerasi, E., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., Tzanetakis, N. (2003). Microbiological study of Manura, a

394

hard cheese made from raw ovine milk in the Greek island Sifnos. International Journal

395

of Dairy Technology, 56(2), 117-122.

17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 396

Hatzikamari, M., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., Tzanetakis, N. (1999). Microbiological

397

characteristics of Anevato: a traditional Greek cheese. Journal of Applied Microbiology,

398

87(4), 595-601.

399

Hébrard, G., Blanquet, S., Beyssac, E., Remondetto, G., Subirade, M., & Alric, M. (2006). Use of whey protein beads as a new carrier system for recombinant yeasts in human

401

digestive tract. Journal of Biotechnology, 127(1), 151-160.

403

Heidebach, T., Först, P., & Kulozik, U. (2009). Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins. Food Hydrocolloids, 23(7), 1670-1677.

SC

402

RI PT

400

Kalogridou-Vassiliadou, D., Tzanetakis, N., & Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. (1994). Microbiological

405

and physicochemical characteristics of'Anthotyro', a Greek traditional whey cheese.

406

Food Microbiology, 11(1), 15-19.

407

M AN U

404

Kaminarides, S. (2015). A modified form of Myzithra cheese produced by substituting the fresh cheese whey by dried whey protein concentrate and ovine milk and cream. Small

409

Ruminant Research, 131, 118-122.

410

TE D

408

Kandylis, P., Drouza, C., Bekatorou, A., & Koutinas, A.A. (2010). Scale-up of extremely low temperature fermentations of grape must by wheat supported yeast cells. Bioresource

412

Technology, 101(19), 7484-7491.

414 415 416 417

Katechaki, E., Solomonidis, T., Bekatorou, A., & Koutinas, A. A. (2010). Thermal drying of

AC C

413

EP

411

Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and its efficient use as starter for whey fermentation and unsalted cheese making. Applied Biochemistry Biotechnology, 162(5), 1270-1285.

Kim, J. G., Lee, E., Kim, S. H., Whang, K. Y., Oh, S., & Imm, J. Y. (2009). Effects of a

418

Lactobacillus casei 393 fermented milk product on bone metabolism in ovariectomised

419

rats. International Dairy Journal, 19(11), 690-695.

18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 420

Kourkoutas, Y., Kandylis, P., Panas, P., Dooley, J. S. G., Nigam, P., & Koutinas, A. A. (2006).

421

Evaluation of freeze-dried kefir coculture as starter in feta-type cheese production.

422

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(9), 6124-6135.

423

Koutinas, A. A., Papapostolou, H., Dimitrellou, D., Kopsahelis, N., Katechaki, E., Bekatorou, A., & Bosnea, L. A. (2009). Whey valorisation: A complete and novel technology

425

development for dairy industry starter culture production. Bioresource Technology,

426

100(15), 3734-3739.

429

SC

428

Kubíčková, J., & Grosch, W. (1997). Evaluation of potent odorants of Camembert cheese by dilution and concentration techniques. International Dairy Journal, 7(1), 65-70.

M AN U

427

RI PT

424

Lioliou, K., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., Tzanetakis, N., & Robinson, R. K. (2001). Changes in the

430

microflora of manouri, a traditional Greek whey cheese, during storage. International

431

Journal of Dairy Technology, 54(3), 100-106.

434 435

TE D

433

Livney, Y.D. (2010). Milk proteins as vehicles for bioactives. Current Opinion in Colloid Interface Science, 15(1), 73-83.

Lye, H. S., Rusul, G., & Liong, M. T. (2010). Removal of cholesterol by lactobacilli via incorporation and conversion to coprostanol. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(4), 1383-1392.

EP

432

McSweeney, P. L. H., & Fox, P. F. (2004). Metabolism of residual lactose and of lactate and

437

citrate. In P. F. Fox, P. L. H. McSweeney, T. M. Cogan, & T. P. Guinee (Eds.), Cheese:

438

AC C

436

Chemistry, physics and microbiology (pp. 347-360). London: Elsevier Academic Press.

439

Molimard, P., & Spinnler, H. E. (1996). Review: Compounds involved in the flavor of surface

440

mold-ripened cheeses: Origins and properties. Journal of Dairy Science, 79(2), 169-184.

441

Nikolaou, E., Tzanetakis, N., Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E., & Robinson, R. K. (2002). Changes in

442

the microbiological and chemical characteristics of an artisanal, low-fat cheese made

19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 443

from raw ovine milk during ripening. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 55(1),

444

12-17. Papaioannou, G., Chouliara, I., Karatapanis, A. E., Kontominas, M. G., & Savvaidis, I. N.

446

(2007). Shelf-life of a Greek whey cheese under modified atmosphere packaging.

447

International Dairy Journal, 17(4), 358-364.

448

RI PT

445

Pappa, E. C., Samelis, J., Kondyli, E., & Pappas, A.C. (2016). Characterisation of Urda whey

cheese: Evolution of main biochemical and microbiological parameters during ripening

450

and vacuum packaged cold storage. International Dairy Journal, 58, 54-57.

SC

449

Pinho, O., Pintado, A. I., Gomes, A. M., Pintado, M. M. E., Malcata, F. X., & Ferreira, I. M.

452

(2004). Interrelationships among microbiological, physicochemical, and biochemical

453

properties of Terrincho cheese, with emphasis on biogenic amines. Journal of Food

454

Protection, 67(12), 2779-2785.

456

Pintado, M. E., & Malcata, F. X. (2000). Characterization of whey cheese packaged under

TE D

455

M AN U

451

vacuum. Journal of Food Protection, 63(2), 216-221. Plessas, S., Bekatorou, A., Gallanagh, J., Nigam, P., Koutinas, A. A., & Psarianos, C. (2008).

458

Evolution of aroma volatiles during storage of sourdough breads made by mixed

459

cultures of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus or

460

Lactobacillus helveticus. Food Chemistry, 107(2), 883-889.

AC C

EP

457

461

Plessas, S., Trantallidi, M., Bekatorou, A., Kanellaki, M., Nigam, P., & Koutinas, A.A. (2007).

462

Immobilization of kefir and Lactobacillus casei on brewery spent grains for use in

463 464 465

sourdough wheat bread making. Food Chemistry, 105(1), 187-194. Prazeres, A. R., Carvalho, F., & Rivas, J. (2012). Cheese whey management: a review. Journal of Environmental Management, 110, 48-68.

20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 466

Psoni, L., Tzanetakis, N., & Litopoulou-Tzanetaki, E. (2006). Characteristics of Batzos cheese

467

made from raw, pasteurized and/or pasteurized standardized goat milk and a native

468

culture. Food Control, 17(7), 533-539.

469

Sen, P., Bhattacharjee, C., & Bhattacharya, P. (2016). Experimental studies and twodimensional modelling of a packed bed bioreactor used for production of galacto-

471

oligosaccharides (GOS) from milk whey. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 39(3),

472

361-380.

RI PT

470

Sidira, M., Dimitrellou, D., Kanellaki, M., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2010a). Volatile compounds of

474

probiotic fermented sausages produced using immobilized L. casei on wheat, In: C-T.,

475

Ho, C. J., Mussinan, F. Shahidi, & E. Tratras Contis (Eds.), Recent advances in food and

476

flavor chemistry. Food flavors and encapsulation, health benefits, analytical methods

477

and molecular biology of functional foods. (pp. 178-184). Cambridge, UK: RSC

478

Publishing.

M AN U

SC

473

Sidira, M., Galanis, A., Ypsilantis, P., Karapetsas, A., Progaki, Z., Simopoulos, C., &

480

Kourkoutas, Y. (2010b). Effect of probiotic-fermented milk administration on

481

gastrointestinal survival of Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 and modulation of intestinal

482

microbial flora. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19(4), 224-230.

484 485 486 487

EP

Sidira, M., Santarmaki, V., Kiourtzidis, M., Argyri, A. A., Papadopoulou, O. S., Chorianopoulos,

AC C

483

TE D

479

N., Tassou, C., Kaloutsas, S., Galanis, A., & Kourkoutas, Y. (2017). Evaluation of

immobilized Lactobacillus plantarum 2035 on whey protein as adjunct probiotic culture in yoghurt production. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 75, 137-146.

Tiptiri-Kourpeti, A., Spyridopoulou, K., Santarmaki, V., Aindelis, G., Tompoulidou, E.,

488

Lamprianidou, E. E., Saxami, G., Ypsilantis, P., Lampri, E. S., Simopoulos, C., Kotsianidis,

489

I., Galanis, A., Kourkoutas, Y., Dimitrellou, D., & Chlichlia, K. (2016). Lactobacillus casei

21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 490

exerts anti-proliferative effects accompanied by apoptotic cell death and up-regulation

491

of TRAIL in colon carcinoma cells. PloS One, 11(2), e0147960.

492

Trmčić, A., Chauhan, K., Kent, D. J., Ralyea, R. D., Martin, N. H., Boor, K. J., Wiedmann, M. (2016). Coliform detection in cheese is associated with specific cheese characteristics,

494

but no association was found with pathogen detection. Journal of Dairy Science, 99,

495

6105–6120.

498 499 500

and goats' milk. International Journal of Food Properties, 15(3), 665-682.

SC

497

Vagenas, G., & Roussis, I. G. (2012). Fat-derived volatiles of various products of cows', ewes',

Viljoen, B.C. (2001). The interaction between yeasts and bacteria in dairy environments.

M AN U

496

RI PT

493

International Journal of Food Microbiology, 69(1), 37-44.

Yadav, J. S. S., Bezawada, J., Elharche, S., Yan, S., Tyagi, R. D., & Surampalli, R. Y. (2014). Simultaneous single-cell protein production and COD removal with characterization of

502

residual protein and intermediate metabolites during whey fermentation by K.

503

marxianus. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 37(6), 1017-1029.

506 507 508 509 510

International Dairy Journal, 11, 185-201.

EP

505

Yvon, M., & Rijnen, L. (2001). Cheese flavor formation by amino acid catabolism.

Zerfiridis, G.K. (2001). Whey cheeses. In: G. K. Zerfiridis, (Ed.). Technology of Dairy Products-I. Cheese-making. (pp. 229). Thessaloniki: Giaxoudi-Giapouli.

AC C

504

TE D

501

Ziino, M., Condurso, C., Romeo, V., Giuffrida, D., Verzera, A. (2005). Characterization of “Provola dei Nebrodi”, a typical Sicilian cheese, by volatiles analysis using SPME-GC/MS. International Dairy Journal, 15, 585–593.

22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Effect of different lactobacilli cultures on physicochemical characteristic of novel dried whey cheeses during ripening.

C

1

FLC

3.98±0.16

4

2.94±0.10

15

b,C

1.08±0.07

30

0.41±0.05

45

Tr

60

Tr

a,B

b,A

0.26±0.04

(g/100g cheese)

4

0.11±0.02

0.19±0.02

a,A

A

0.39±0.04

0.19±0.04

B A

Tr

Tr

45

Tr

Tr

60

Tr

Tr

6.60±0.10

b,B

4

6.27±0.08

b,B

15

5.60±0.04

c,A

30

5.54±0.06

b,A

45

5.35±0.02

d,A

60

5.25±0.06

acid/100g

15

cheese)

30 45

6.30±0.07

5.10±0.07

0.26±0.06

a,B

0.50±0.07

AB

0.54±0.05

a,B

0.58±0.07

a,B

0.15±0.02

a,A

Tr Tr

0.67±0.08

b,B

ab,B

A

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

Tr

A

6.32±0.08

ab,D

0.27±0.05

6.20±0.02

A

0.58±0.04

0.12±0.03

ab,D

6.15±0.08

b,C

4.86±0.04a,B

ab,B

4.73±0.04

a,AB

a,A

4.68±0.06

a,AB a,AB

b,C

5.15±0.01 4.97±0.05

5.05±0.06

b,BC

a,A

4.80±0.04

a,AB

4.75±0.04

c,A

4.79±0.02

bc,AB

4.70±0.02

ab,A

4.60±0.03

b,A

4.67±0.03

ab,A

4.53±0.02

ab,A

0.36±0.01

b,A

0.40±0.02

ab,AB

0.65±0.02

0.47±0.02

0.68±0.04

Tr

Tr

0.13±0.03

ab,AB

a,B

0.85±0.04a,B

A

0.28±0.04

0.50±0.06

2.05±0.08

b,A

1.20±0.04

1.62±0.07

D

b,C

0.31±0.06

0.25±0.02

ab,A

0.47±0.03

3.85±0.11

a,B

Tr

ab,B

4.75±0.05

a,AB

C

Tr

b,A

4.85±0.01

ILB

3.90±0.10

ab,A

b,A

4.85±0.02

0.28±0.03

0.47±0.04

b,C

1.03±0.07

5.30±0.02

a,B

EP

60

0.32±0.07

2.36±0.11

b,B

4.91±0.03

a,A

0.14±0.02

ab,B

5.40±0.06

TE D

4

c,A

3.96±0.12

Tr ab,C

30

1

ILC D

Tr

0.02±0.01

(g Lactic

ab,AB

b,B

0.68±0.02

0.68±0.07

ab,B

0.72±0.04

0.72±0.08

ab,B

0.72±0.07

ab,B

0.54±0.04

b,BC

0.68±0.04

ab,BC

0.72±0.05

0.79±0.08

ab,C

0.79±0.08

ab,C

a,C

a,A

b,A b,B

b,BC

b,BC

0.72±0.02

ab,BC

0.92±0.05

0.83±0.06

ab,C

1.08±0.06

b,D

0.90±0.05

ab,C

1.08±0.06

b,D

b,CD

66.3±2.1D

68.7±2.0C

68.7±1.9E

68.8±1.2E

4

58.6±1.7

C

54.0±1.5

B

53.9±1.4

D

55.0±1.7

D

52.3±1.0

C

15

53.2±1.0

BC

49.8±1.7

B

49.1±1.1

CD

49.9±1.0

CD

48.7±0.9

C

30

46.8±0.9

AB

45.8±2.1

AB

44.9±1.0

BC

44.5±0.9

B

AC C

1

42.2±1.2

A

60

39.5±0.7

A

1

1.6±0.1

45

(% w/w)

0.97±0.06

a,B

Tr

1

Ash

2.16±0.08

b,C

15

Acidity

(% w/w)

3.90±0.15

Tr a,B

1

Moisture

FLB D

Tr

Glucose/Galactose

pH

D

RI PT

(g/100g cheese)

day

SC

Lactose

Whey cheese type

Maturation

M AN U

Analysis

A B B

4

7.7±0.4

15

9.1±0.4

B

30

9.9±0.4

45

10.1±0.7

B

10.3±1.0

B

60

40.5±1.0

A

38.5±0.5

A

1.5±0.2

A

7.4±0.3

B

8.7±0.5

B

9.2±0.4

B

9.8±0.7

B

9.7±0.7

B

39.7±0.8

AB

38.0±0.3 1.5±0.2

A

A

7.3±0.4

B

8.9±0.1

C

9.3±0.1

C

9.3±0.4

C

9.2±0.2

C

40.4±0.4

67.0±1.1D

BC

42.8±1.0

AB

40.2±0.6AB

A

37.3±0.3

37.6±0.2

A

A

1.5±0.2

7.3±0.2

B

7.3±0.5

B

8.6±0.4

B

8.4±0.5

B

9.4±0.5

B

9.8±0.4

B

9.3±0.5

B

9.8±0.6

B

9.2±0.4

B

9.7±0.8

B

1.5±0.1

A

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Means within a row with different lowercase superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

A-E

Means within a column

with different uppercase superscripts in the same analysis differ significantly (P<0.05). C: control whey cheese produced without culture, FLC: whey cheese produced with free L. casei ATCC 393 cells, FLB: whey cheese produced with free L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells, ILC: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. casei ATCC

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

393 cells on casein, ILB: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells on casein.

AC C

a-d

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 4. Effect of different lactobacilli cultures on major aroma-related compounds (μg/kg) of novel dried whey cheeses after ripening for 60 days. Identification

Compound

C

FLC

FLB

ILC

ILB

Esters RT, KI, MS

Nd

Nd

Ehtyl hexanoate

RT, KI, MS

2.1

0.3

Ethyl octanoate

RT, KI, MS

8.3

4.4

Ethyl decanoate

RT, KI, MS

15.0

Ethyl dodecanoate

KI, MS

8.5

Ethyl tetradecanoate

KI, MS

Nd

Ethyl hexadecanoate

KI, MS

Nd

3-Methylbutyl acetate

KI, MS

Nd

Methyl decanoate 2-Phenylethyl acetate Ethyl-9-hexadecenoate Organic acids Pentanoic acid Octanoic acid Nonanoic acid Decanoic acid

Nd

Nd

1.1

2.2

5.1

5.2

Nd

19.9

14.8

16.5

34.6

7.9

Nd

5.6

11.2

14.0

Nd

6.6

Nd

12.6

Nd

4.5

7.8

Nd

Nd

Nd

3.7

6.2

Nd

1.0

Nd

2.1

MS

4.5

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

RT, KI, MS

9.8

3.5

6.8

5.4

2.8

KI, MS

Nd

16.5

Nd

8.2

11.6

MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

11.0

KI, MS

Nd

29.6

17.4

4.3

22.0

RT, KI, MS

RT, KI, MS RT, KI, MS

118.1 44.7 114.2 62.3 197.8 Nd

15.5

Nd

7.3

23.7

286.3 350.9 662.8 397.8 566.2

KI, MS

80.4

52.9

43.8

71.6 104.3

2-Methyl butanoic acid

KI, MS

Nd

31.6

Nd

Nd

36.2

3-Methyl butanoic acid

MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

33.8

2-Ethyl hexanoic acid

MS

Nd

2.8

Nd

Nd

Nd

10-Undecenoic acid

KI, MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

1.5

AC C

EP

Dodecanoic acid

KI, MS

TE D

Hexanoic acid

0.3

M AN U

3-Methylbutyl hexanoate

Nd

SC

Ethyl butanoate

RI PT

method

Alcohols

1-Hexanol

RT, KI, MS

Nd

Nd

0.8

Nd

Nd

1-Heptanol

KI, MS

Nd

Nd

1.3

Nd

Nd

1-Octanol

RT, KI, MS

Nd

Nd

1.0

1.5

Nd

1-Nonanol

RT, KI, MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

2.4

4.4

1-Dodecanol

RT, KI, MS

Nd

1.5

Nd

Nd

Nd

4-Methyl-2-pentanol

RT, KI, MS

11.6

0.3

Nd

Nd

Nd

3-Methyl-1-butanol

RT, KI, MS

12.0

15

10.5

Nd

Nd

2-Heptanol

RT, KI, MS

9.0

4.2

4.9

1.9

Nd

2-Nonanol

RT, KI, MS

7.6

5.5

10.0

4.9

Nd

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

RT, KI, MS

10.9

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

2-Ethyl-1-hexanol

RT, KI, MS

7.1

7.6

2.8

1.6

Nd

1,3-Butanediol

KI, MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

Nd

51.8

Phenyl ethanol

RT, KI, MS

56.4

95.2

16.5

59.8

74.7

Phenol

RT, KI, MS

5.6

Nd

3.4

2.7

8.5

3- Methyl-phenol (m-cresol)

MS

Nd

Nd

7.4

21.2

2.7

4-Methyl-phenol (p-cresol)

KI, MS

2.3

13.6

8.5

46.9

8.6

3-Methyl butanal

KI, MS

Nd

Nd

Nd

43.2

Nd

2-Heptanone

KI, MS

26.6

43.1

36.5

11.7

5.4

2-Octanone

MS

4.2

1.2

1.1

0.3

0.6

KI, MS

7.9

2-Pentadecanone 3-Hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) Benzaldehyde Lactones γ-Decalactone δ-Decalactone γ-Dodecalactone δ-Dodecalactone

MS

Nd

KI, MS

Nd

4.9

22.4

7.9

15.4

Nd

Nd

2.5

Nd

20.5

0.9

3.1

27.9

M AN U

2-Undecanone

SC

Carbonyl compounds

RI PT

1-Octen-3-ol

KI,MS

27.5

8.9

4.6

10.5

18.9

KI, MS

Nd

4.5

Nd

Nd

Nd

KI, MS

Nd

8.1

2.5

Nd

Nd

KI, MS

8.2

15.4

6.8

24.3

14.4

KI, MS

2.9

2.9

Nd

3.7

2.8

TE D

RT: Positive identification by retention times that agree with authentic compounds generated in the laboratory, KI: Tentative identification by kovats’ retention index compared to the literature, MS: tentative identification by mass spectra obtained from NIST107, NIST21 and SZTERP libraries, C: control whey cheese produced without culture, FLC: whey cheese produced with free L. casei ATCC 393 cells, FLB: whey cheese produced with free L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells, ILC: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. casei ATCC 393 cells on casein,

AC C

EP

ILB: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells on casein, Nd: non detected.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 5. Effect of different lactobacilli cultures on major aroma-related groups (μg/kg of cheese) of novel dried whey cheeses after ripening for 60 days. C

Compound

FLC

FLB

ILC

ILB

μg/kg ab

c

a

ab

c

54.4±2.5 81.2±3.6 26.7±1.9 54.4±3.1 73.9±3.9 a a b a c 484.8±13.8 528.0±16.2 838.2±13.9 543.3±10.8 996.5±23.7 b b a b b 122.5±5.7 142.9±4.4 67.1±2.7 142.9±6.9 150.7±7.8 ab ab a b ab 66.2±2.3 78.6±3.1 65.5±1.9 79.2±2.7 68.2±1.4 a b a b a 11.1±1.9 30.9±2.0 9.3±0.9 28.0±1.7 17.2±1.3

Total

739.0±23.8a 861.6±19.9ab 1006.8±29.8b 847.8±20.3a 1306.5±30.7c

RI PT

Esters Organic acids Alcohols Carbonyl compounds Lactones a-c

SC

Means within a row with different lowercase superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). C: control whey cheese produced without culture, FLC: whey cheese produced with free L. casei ATCC 393 cells, FLB: whey cheese

M AN U

produced with free L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells, ILC: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. casei ATCC

AC C

EP

TE D

393 cells on casein, ILB: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells on casein.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 2. Effect of different lactobacilli cultures on total aerobic, lactococci and lactobacilli counts (log cfu/g) of novel dried whey cheeses during ripening. Whey cheese type

Maturation C

Total aerobic

1

5.5±0.2

count

4

6.7±0.2

a,AB BC

FLB 6.8±0.2

ab,AB

7.9±0.4

7.0±0.3 7.8±0.2

8.4±0.4

AB

8.5±0.3

B

B

9.5±0.2

B

B

9.5±0.5

B

A

5.4±0.1

AB

6.5±0.2

8.7±0.4

C

8.8±0.5

45

9.0±0.5

C

9.2±0.4

60

9.1±0.4

C

9.4±0.4

Mesophilic

1

5.4±0.1

A

5.3±0.2

lactococci

4

6.5±0.3

AB

6.3±0.3

15

7.8±0.2BC

30

8.3±0.4

C

45

8.3±0.3

C

60

8.3±0.4

C

Thermophilic

1

4.8±0.1

lactococci

4

6.0±0.3

15

7.7±0.2

30

7.8±0.3B

Lactobacilli

1 4

8.0±0.4

B

8.2±0.3

B

4.0±0.1

a,A

5.9±0.3

a,B

7.2±0.3

B

30

8.8±0.4

45 60

AC C

AB

6.7±0.1

b,AB

8.3±0.2

7.2±0.4

8.3±0.2

B

9.3±0.4

B

9.3±0.4

B

9.7±0.2

B

9.9±0.4

B

9.8±0.3

B

9.9±0.5

B

5.7±0.2

AB

6.7±0.3

M AN U

A

5.8±0.2

AB

6.8±0.2

7.8±0.3BC

C

8.2±0.3

C

8.5±0.2

C

8.7±0.3

C

7.8±0.3

BC

7.9±0.3

7.8±0.2

ab,A

5.1±0.2

5.1±0.2

ab,A

B

7.1±0.2

8.0±0.3

B

8.2±0.2

8.2±0.4B

8.3±0.3BC

6.9±0.2

B

8.4±0.3

8.2±0.3

b,A

6.4±0.2

8.0±0.3

b,AB

7.7±0.1

8.3±0.3

C

8.9±0.3

8.9±0.3

C

9.4±0.4

8.9±0.3

C

9.3±0.4

7.9±0.2

5.6±0.1

C

8.5±0.3

C

BC

7.7±0.2

ab,A

5.9±0.1

8.3±0.2

8.4±0.3

b,A

7.2±0.3

b,A

7.2±0.2

BC

8.3±0.2

8.9±0.3

BC

C

b,A

6.9±0.2

8.3±0.3

8.7±0.3

BC

8.8±0.3

B

C

9.4±0.4

BC

9.2±0.4

BC

8.9±0.3 8.2±0.2

b,AB

B

8.9±0.3C

BC

B

BC

B

8.9±0.3C

8.0±0.2

7.8±0.3BC C

BC

b,AB

AB

8.4±0.4

7.2±0.3

C

A

BC

B

8.7±0.4

B

b,AB

8.9±0.2

8.8±0.5

A

7.5±0.3BC

ab,A

AB

8.2±0.4

8.5±0.3

6.2±0.1

ILB b,A

C

8.0±0.2

BC

EP

15

7.5±0.3BC

TE D

60

B

ab,AB

8.3±0.3

30

A

ab,A

AB

7.7±0.3

a,A

ILC

b,A

15

45

a-b

FLC a,A

RI PT

day

SC

Microorganism

8.2±0.3

C

BC

b,A

b,AB

AB

8.8±0.3B

9.5±0.3

B

9.4±0.4

B

B

9.7±0.4

B

9.8±0.4

B

B

9.6±0.4

B

9.7±0.4

B

Means within a row with different lowercase superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

A-C

Means within a column

with different uppercase superscripts in the same analysis differ significantly (P<0.05). C: control whey cheese produced without culture, FLC: whey cheese produced with free L. casei ATCC 393 cells, FLB: whey cheese produced with free L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells, ILC: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. casei ATCC 393 cells on casein, ILB: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells on casein.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 3. Effect of different lactobacilli cultures on yeasts, coliforms, enterobacteria and staphylococci counts (log cfu/g) of novel dried whey cheeses during ripening.

C

1

5.3±0.2

4

5.4±0.2

AB

15

Enterobacteria

b,AB

5.2±0.3

5.3±0.3

5.2±0.3

C

5.1±0.2

B

4.5±0.2

4.7±0.3

a,B

a,ABC

a,AB

4.1±0.2

a,A

3.4±0.1

a,A

a,A

3.3±0.1

a,A

45

5.0±0.2

b,A

3.4±0.1

60

4.9±0.2

b,A

3.1±0.1

1

4.7±0.1

A

4.6±0.2

BC

4.7±0.2

4

5.4±0.1

AB

4.9±0.3

BC

5.0±0.4

15

6.2±0.3b,BC

30

6.5±0.4

b,C

b,ABC

45

5.9±0.2

60

5.1±0.2

b,AB A

1

4.7±0.1

4

5.5±0.2

15

6.1±0.3

30

6.5±0.4b,B

1

AB

b,AB

4.0±0.2

a,BC

5.8±0.3

60

5.6±0.3ab,C

a,AB

4.0±0.2

4.0±0.1

a,AB

5.2±0.3

C

5.3±0.3

C

4.4±0.2

4.1±0.2

a,BC

4.0±0.2

a,AB

3.2±0.1

a,A

2.8±0.1

3.3±0.1

3.0±0.1

C

B

4.6±0.3

B

4.7±0.2

C

4.5±0.2a,B

a,A

2.9±0.1

4.8±0.2

BC

4.6±0.2

BC

4.8±0.2

4.9±0.2

BC

5.2±0.3

BC

4.6±0.2

4.2±0.2a,AB

5.1±0.2

b,AB

3.2±0.1

A

4.2±0.2

4.0±0.1

a,AB

ab,C

4.2±0.2a,AB 3.8±0.1

a,AB

a,A

3.3±0.1

ABC

4.3±0.2

5.8±0.3

5.3±0.3

30

6.3±0.4

b,B

4.8±0.2

45

5.7±0.3

b,B

3.8±0.2

60

5.3±0.2

b,AB

3.0±0.1

5.0±0.3

5.3±0.2

ab,BC

a,A

4.7±0.2

3.3±0.1

ab,C

a,AB

B

a,A

5.4±0.3

a,ABC

4.6±0.3

3.8±0.2

3.3±0.1

4.4±0.2

a,BC

a,ABC

a,A

b,AB

EP

C

3.5±0.2

b,B

AC C

5.4±0.3

4.4±0.2

5.7±0.3

15

5.2±0.3

AB

5.5±0.2

4.3±0.2

ILB C

AB

4.7±0.3ab,AB

4.1±0.2

b,B

4

a-b

ILC B

30

45

Staphylococci

6.5±0.3

b,B

FLB C

TE D

Coliforms

FLC AB

RI PT

day

SC

Yeasts/Molds

Whey cheese type

Maturation

M AN U

Microorganism

a,A

ABC

a,B

4.4±0.2

a,AB

3.7±0.1

a,A

2.9±0.1

4.9±0.1

a,BC

a,AB a,A

C

4.6±0.2

C

BC

4.5±0.2

C

ab,C

4.5±0.2a,BC 3.8±0.1

4.7±0.2a,C

4.7±0.1

4.3±0.2a,BC

a,AB

3.5±0.2

a,A

2.8±0.1

3.0±0.1

4.0±0.3

B

a,C

a,AB a,A

4.1±0.2

C

4.7±0.2

ab,BC

4.2±0.2

a,B

ab,C

5.3±0.3

ab,BC

4.2±0.2

a,B

4.2±0.2a,C

a,BC

4.7±0.2

a,BC

4.2±0.2

a,B

4.1±0.1

a,AB

3.7±0.2

a,AB

3.1±0.1

a,AB

3.2±0.2

a,A

3.0±0.1

a,A

2.7±0.1

a,A

2.5±0.1

Means within a row with different lowercase superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

4.2±0.2

a,C

a,BC

a,AB a,A

A-C

Means within a column

with different uppercase superscripts in the same analysis differ significantly (P<0.05). C: control whey cheese produced without culture, FLC: whey cheese produced with free L. casei ATCC 393 cells, FLB: whey cheese produced with free L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells, ILC: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. casei ATCC 393 cells on casein, ILB: whey cheese produced with immobilized L. bulgaricus ATCC 11842 cells on casein.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Research highlights

Novel whey cheese production by thermally dried lactobacilli



Casein was used as immobilization carrier



Novel whey cheeses with improved quality and extended shelf life were produced



Counts of coliforms, enterobacteria and staphylococci were significantly reduced

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT