Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in inclined pipe

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in inclined pipe

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, (2019), 32(8): 1885–1894 Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Beihang University Chinese Journal of Aer...

2MB Sizes 0 Downloads 141 Views

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, (2019), 32(8): 1885–1894

Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Beihang University

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics [email protected] www.sciencedirect.com

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in inclined pipe Zhi TAO a, Liangwei LI a, Jianqin ZHU a,*, Xizhuo HU a,b, Longyun WANG a, Lu QIU a a National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aero-engine Aero-thermodynamics, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China b College of Aeronautical Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received 2 April 2018; revised 10 July 2018; accepted 5 September 2018 Available online 10 July 2019

KEYWORDS Heat transfer; Hydrocarbon fuel; Inclined pipe; Supercritical pressure; Variable properties

Abstract Numerical simulations of flow and heat transfer to supercritical RP-3 through the inclined tubes have been performed using LS k–e model embedded in Fluent. The physical properties of RP-3 were obtained using the generalized corresponding state laws based on the fourcomponent surrogate model. Mass flow rate is 0.3 g/s, system pressure is 3 MPa, inlet temperature is 373 K. Inclination of the inclined pipe varied from 90° to 90°, with heat flux varied from 300 kW/m2 to 400 kW/m2. Comparison between the calculated result and the experimental data indicates the range of error reasonable. The results of ±45° show that temperature inhomogeneity in inclined pipe produce the secondary flow in its cross section due to the buoyancy force. Depending on the strength of the temperature inhomogeneity, there will be two different forms of secondary flow and both contribute to the convective heat transfer in the pipe. The secondary flow intensity decreases when the inhomogeneity alleviates and thermal acceleration will play a leading role. It will have a greater impact on the turbulent flow to affect the convective heat transfer in the pipe. When changing the inclination, it affects the magnitude of the buoyant component in flow direction. The angle increases, the buoyancy component decreases. And the peak temperature of wall dominated by the secondary flow will move forward and increase in height. Ó 2019 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction * Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. ZHU). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Committee of CJA.

Production and hosting by Elsevier

As the core component of hypersonic vehicles, scramjet engine1–3 has attracted great attention among many countries. Considering the impact of air viscosity and stagnation shock it will face sever challenge of thermal management. Regenerative cooling4–8 technology has been proposed as an advantageous solution. Nonetheless, the hydrocarbon fuels in the system will

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2019.05.007 1000-9361 Ó 2019 Production and hosting by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1886 flow under supercritical pressure and in supercritical phase finally. Aiming at the flow and heat transfer characteristics under supercritical phase, some researches have been done to study its mechanism and regularity.9–19 Zhou et al.9 researched the heat transfer characteristics of pentane under supercritical phase. The relations among the inlet temperature, wall temperature, mass flux, heat flux, system pressure and axis fluid temperature have been obtained. The results show that when the fluid temperature is closed to the pseudo-critical point, heat transfer deterioration occurs. The decrease of heat flux, the increase of mass flux and system pressure will defer the occurrence of heat transfer deterioration. Liu et al.12 studied the heat transfer characteristics of n-decane in 0.95 mm and 2 mm tubes under different pressure, heat flux and flow direction using experimental method. It is found that under high Reynolds number the buoyancy force and thermal acceleration affect the heat transfer slightly. While Reynolds number is low and the fluid flows upward, the buoyancy force weakens the heat transfer. Wang et al.15 focused on the mechanism of the heat transfer deterioration and found that the dramatic change of properties takes mainly response to it. Specifically under circumstance of low enthalpy the thermal acceleration will be the main reason while under circumstance of high enthalpy the wave of speed in radial direction will be the main reason. The researches mentioned above are all based on the vertical or horizontal tubes. There are few conclusions about supercritical fluid flowing in the inclined tubes. Wu et al.20 studied the heat transfer characteristics of supercritical water in a 22° inclined tube. The result shows buoyancy force will give rise to the natural convection which illustrates the higher temperature at the top of tube wall. Similarly Taklifi et al.21 studied the pressure drop characteristic of supercritical water in a 20° inclined tube. It is found that mass flux has a more obvious effect than the heat flux. When the ratio of mass flux to heat flux is larger than 2.46 kg/kWs, heat transfer deterioration will occur near the pseudo-critical point. Considering that the aircrafts will fly under various postures, generative cooling system must work under conditions inclined. So it is meaningful to study the flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical hydrocarbon fuels in inclined tubes. The numerical method has been adopted to study the flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in a 1.8 mm inclined tube. It will provide a reference for the design of regenerative cooling system.

Z. TAO et al. properties are dependent on experiments, the workload will be too huge to cover. So the concept of substitution model which substitutes the RP-3 with the mixture of a few typical components has been proposed. Based on the previous studies, a four-species substitution model proposed by Zheng et al.,22 consisting of 19.1% n-decane, 36.5% n-dodecane, 29.9% nbutylbenzene and 14.5% methyl-cyclohexane, fits fairly well with the experimental data. The thermodynamic properties and transport properties of the substitution model at different temperatures were obtained by using the generalized corresponding law. The accuracy of it was investigated by the experiments performed in Beihang University.23 Therefore, the fourspecies substitution model is selected and the property library is calculated from it. Temperature inhomogeneity results in non-uniformity of physical properties. So the physical properties of RP-3 on a section can be defined as the section integral of physical parameters. 2.2. Physical modelling The stainless steel tubes have served as the physical model. As can be observed in Fig. 1(a), there is a total length of 450 mm, a diameter of 2 mm and a wall thickness of 0.2 mm. In order to eliminate the impact of inlet and outlet effect, the adiabatic section length of 90 mm in the inlet and length of 60 mm in the outlet have been set to ensure the full development of turbulence. The inlet wall is a fixed mass flow boundary and mass flow rate is 0.3 g/s. The outlet wall is a fixed pressure boundary and pressure is 3 MPa. Inlet temperature is 373 K and inclination of the inclined pipe varied from 90° to 90°, with heat flux varied from 300 kW/m2 to 400 kW/m2. As can be observed in Fig. 1(b), the inclination is the angle between the tube and the horizontal line. It distributes over 90° to 90°. According to the characteristics of the physical model, it is divided into one solid region and one fluid region. The grids height of the first layer has been set as 0.0005 mm to satisfy the requirement of LS low Reynolds model that y+ < 1. The growth rate of the grid height near wall has been set as

2. Methodology Computational fluid dynamic software ANSYS FLUENT 15.0 is used for the numerical simulation of supercritical RP3 in inclined tubes. RP-3 thermal physical properties, governing equation, turbulence modelling, computational grid and numerical method are introduced respectively below. 2.1. RP-3 thermal physical properties China’s aviation kerosene RP-3 is a kind of complex alkane mixture, including hundreds of olefins and aromatic hydrocarbons, etc. In order to obtain the properties of RP-3, it is impossible to model each component of RP-3 in the case of limited computing capacity and memory. And if the base data of

Fig. 1

Physical model.

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics

1887 where Cl is the constant, fl is the damping function, e is the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate. Turbulent kinetic h energy  equation: i @ @xi

ðqui kÞ ¼ @x@ i

l þ rlkt

@k @xi

þ Pk þ Gk  qe  Sk where rk

is the turbulent kinetic energy Pr number, Pk and Gk are turbulence kinetic energy terms caused by shear stress and buoyancy, Sk is the source of turbulence kinetic energy equation. Turbulent dissipation rate: h  i lt @ @ @e ð qu e Þ ¼ l þ i re @xi @xi @xi 2

þCe1 f1 ke ðPk þ Gk Þ  Ce2 f2 q ek þ Se Fig. 2

Grid independent solution.

1.05. The outlet temperature and convective heat transfer coefficient are selected as the indicators for grid independent solution. The results are shown in Fig. 2. It can be seen that when the number of grids reaches 462,420, the change of two indicators (wall temperature T and heat transfer coefficient h) is less than 1%, which satisfies the condition of grid independent solution. 2.3. Governing equation and turbulence modelling Since only the steady flow with uniform heat flux under supercritical pressure is considered in this paper, none of the governing equations contain unstable terms. The governing equations are as follows: Continuity equation: @ ðqui Þ ¼0 @xi

where re is the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, Ce1 and Ce2 are the constants, f1 and f2 are the coefficient functions, Se is the source term of the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate equation. 2.4. Numerical method The inlet boundary condition is set as the mass flow inlet, the outlet is set as the pressure outlet, the wall of heating section is set as the uniform heating wall with constant heat flux, the wall of inlet and outlet section is set as the adiabatic wall. The pressure-based segregated algorithm has been used to discretize the equations and the simple scheme is adopted as the pressure–velocity coupling method. The second-order upwind scheme is adopted for solving the momentum equation and the energy equation to improve the computational accuracy. The first-order upwind scheme is adopted for solving the turbulence equation to enhance the robustness. The convergence criterion for all equations is that the residual is less than 106. 3. Results and discussion

where q is the density, ui is the velocity tensor and xi is the coordinate tensor. Momentum conservation equation:    @  @p @sij @  qui uj ¼ qgi  þ þ q u0i u0j @xj @xi @xj @xj In which   @u @uk @ui sij ¼ l @x where gi is the gravity, p is the þ @xji  23 dij @x j k pressure, l is the dynamic viscosity and dij is the Skronecker delta. Energy conservation equation:   @ @ @T l @H @p þ ui ðqui HÞ ¼ k þ t  þ Q_ þ / @xi @xi @xi Prt @xi @xi

3.1. Calculation method verification In order to verify the accuracy of the numerical simulation method, the numerical results are compared with the experimental data. Experimental data from the public paper24 has been adopted. The conditions of the data cover the wall heat flux of 300, 400 kW/m2 at pressure of 5 MPa, inlet temperature of 373 K and mass flow rate of 0.003 kg/s. The comparison is presented in Fig. 3. x is where the fluid is located and d is tube diameter. As can be observed that the calculation results are in

where turbulence heat flux is modeled by the Boussinesq hypothesis, Pr is the turbulent Prandtl number, k is the thermal conductivity, T is the temperature, Q_ is the internal heat source, is the dissipation function, H is the specific enthalpy, / is internal heat source. Low Reynolds number two-equation model has been selected as the turbulence model. According to previous studies, it can simulate the turbulent flow and heat transfer of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel well.4 Basic equation of k–e: lt ¼ qCl fl

k2 e

Fig. 3

Comparison of numerical and experimental data.

1888

Z. TAO et al.

good agreement with the experimental results in the most region. At x/d = 20–60 heat transfer deterioration occurs and the precision of substitution model and turbulence model decrease. The deviation grows a bit. 3.2. Heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in 45° tube In order to study the typical convective heat transfer characteristics of the supercritical RP-3 in the inclined tubes, the reference operating condition at 45° has been selected and in which the mass flow rate is 0.3 g/s, the heat flux is 300 kW/m2, the system pressure is 3 MPa, the inlet temperature is 373 K. A control group without considering buoyancy effect has been set. As the paper focuses on the influence of dramatic changes in properties and buoyancy force on heat transfer, the effect of cracking will be neglected, for that the temperature region where cracking is remarkable is far away from the pseudocritical point where neither properties nor buoyancy force will affect. The heat transfer coefficient along the tube is in Fig. 4. It is obvious that the heat transfer coefficient without G is lower than the condition with G. Thus the special heat transfer law in inclined tubes can be mainly related to the effect of buoyancy force. Considering the condition with G at 45°, there will be a higher heat transfer coefficient level along entire tube and a peak of it in x/d = 20–50. Fig. 5 shows the distribution of the fluid section temperature and the secondary flow in cross-sections. In x/d = 10 it can be seen that near the wall fluid temperature rise rapidly and enter into the supercritical state soon. Its density is about 100 kg/m3, while the density of the internal fluid in subcritical state is about 700 kg/m3. Between the internal and external fluid a great difference in density exists. Under the effect of the buoyance force, the low density fluid near wall moves from the bottom to the top of the pipe, and the internal fluid moves to the bottom. A pair of vortices in cross section generated. They have two effects. One is that high-temperature fluid near wall will be brought to the vertex and results in the highest temperature at the cross-section. The other is that the lowtemperature fluid at the axis will be brought to the wall which enhances the convection in the cross section. Therefore, the secondary flow caused by the buoyancy force will strengthen the heat transfer of supercritical RP-3 in inclined tubes. As long as there is density deviation and buoyancy force in cross-section of pipe, secondary flow will be induced to

Fig. 4

Heat transfer coefficient distribution along pipe.

Fig. 5 Fluid section temperature and secondary flow distribution in the cross sections in 45°.

enhance the convective heat transfer. So along the whole pipe, the heat transfer coefficient in inclined pipe is higher than that in vertical pipe. And near the outlet, fluid enters the supercritical state, the density deviation disappears. The deviation of heat transfer coefficient disappears too. Fig. 6 shows the distribution of Re and Gr number in the tube. Re number characterizes the effect of forced convection on fluid flow and heat transfer and Gr number characterizes the effect of natural convection on flow and heat transfer. It can be seen from the figure that the Reynolds number increases along the tube and the Reynolds number does not change substantially in the range of x/d < 60. Considering that only the fluid near the wall is heated in the section, the thermal acceleration effect acts on the fluid near the wall surface and impact of the overall flow is small. In the front part of the heating section, the main influence on the flow heat transfer is the secondary flow caused by the floating force and the influence of the floating force is weakened at the rear of the tube. Fig. 6 also indicates that Gr number first increases to the peak then decreases and takes the maximum value around x/d = 85. When fluid bulk temperature exceeds the quasi-critical temperature, the density tends to be constant due to the RP-3 characteristics, so the thermal acceleration effect disappears and the Gr number decreases at the end of the pipe. In cross-section of x/d = 30 secondary flow characteristic changes. Comparing to x/d = 15, the other new pair vortices

Fig. 6

Re and Gr number distribution along pipe.

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics appear at the top of tube. In the front of tube, plenty of hightemperature fluid gathers at the top and block the way of directly moving downward along the center line. The secondary flow has to move toward two sides in cross section as shown in Fig. 5 and the other new pair vortices appear. It is beneficial for the convection in the upper section. The lowtemperature fluid between the wall and internal fluid will disappear and blend quickly. The heat transfer coefficient increases. The secondary flow refers to the velocity perpendicular to the flow direction of the cross section, the so-called vortex. In fluid mechanics, the vorticity is used to describe this rotational motion and defined as follows: X ¼ 2x ¼ r  V X is vorticity indicating the rotation of fluid velocity vector which expressed with V and x is the helf of the vorticity. The vector of vorticity has the components in directions of xyz. In this paper, the vortex which expressed with Xz in the cross section is the main research project. And the direction of vorticity is perpendicular from the plane of vortex. Therefore, the component of vorticity in flow direction has been selected. It is calculated as follows: Xz ¼

@t @u  @x @y

The description of vortex strength has been known as eddy flux. For a micro-eddy scroll, the product of the vorticity and the current area is the vortex flux corresponding to the microeddy. Therefore the eddy flux for a finite area which expressed with J can be achieved by the area integral method, as follows, A is the area of the integreation plane: ZZ ZZ X  dA ¼ 2 xn dA J¼ A

A

Quantitative analysis of vortex is important for evaluating the buoyancy effect of supercritical RP-3 under condition of inclination. Vortex flux can directly represent the strength of the vortex. Nevertheless, this parameter can’t be used directly, the Fig. 5 illustrates that there will be one or two pairs of symmetrical vortex in the cross-section. Due to the symmetry phenomenon, area integral result of vortex with the opposite rotation direction and same size will be zero. The literature25,26 found that it is possible to integrate the vorticity by using absolute values to avoid the problem of symmetry offset. The absolute vortex flux calculation method is as follows: ZZ 1 JnABS ¼ jxn jdA AðxÞ

1889 diameter is usually selected. Us represents the intensity of the secondary flow. It can be found that the form of Se is similar to Re. Se represents the ratio of inertial force to viscous force in secondary flow that emerges in flow. Dimensionless parameter Se provides quantitative assessing of the secondary flow effect, which is of great significance for more clearly distinguishing its influence on supercritical RP-3 heat transfer. Fig. 7 shows the distribution of Se calculated from above formula along the pipe at 45°. It can be seen from the figure that the distribution law of Se basically agrees with the distribution law of wall temperature. At the entrance in x/ d = 0–20, the secondary flow appears, which enhances the heat transfer in the pipe. The temperature uniformity of the fluid is improved and the secondary flow decreases correspondingly. Se starts to rise dramatically at x/d = 20 and reaches its maximum at x/d = 40 where the heat transfer coefficient reaches its peak too. From above analysis, it shows that at this period there appears a new pair of vortices in the cross section, which greatly enhances the intensity of secondary flow. Furthermore, Se keeps descending and tends to be zero. The Se number represents the intensity of the secondary flow in the section. When the fluid enters the pipeline, the temperature of the fluid that is next to the heated wall rises rapidly, which is prone to approach the supercritical state. If the supercritical state is reached, the density of the flow adjacent to the wall is smaller compared to the low temperature fluid in the middle channel. In the current case, the aforementioned state is reached at the location x/d = 50, where the Se number reaches the peak value, indicating that a strong secondary flow is generated in the cross section, which significantly affects the heat transfer. A stronger secondary flow results in a higher heat transfer, which gives a higher Nu and a lower wall temperature under the iso-flux thermal boundary condition. The secondary flow plays a significant role in the convective heat transfer of inclined pipe. However, as the convection heat transfer is strengthened by the secondary flow, the fluid temperature in tube homogenizes quickly. The difference of density between internal and external fluid decreases. It can be seen in Fig. 7 that Se starts to decrease when x/d > 70 and the effect of buoyant force weakens.

AðxÞ

In above formula, A represents the area of cross-section. xn is the component of absolute vorticity integral in the flow direction and it presents the secondary flow intensity. In order to make the result more universal, the dimensionless number Se based on JnABS is defined as follows:   qd2h JnABS qdh dh JnABS qdh Us ¼ ¼ Se ¼ l l l In above formula, Se represents the dimensionless secondary flow strength. dh is the reference length and the pipe

Fig. 7

Se number distribution along pipe.

1890

Z. TAO et al.

3.3. Heat transfer characteristics of supercritical RP-3 in 45° tube The study of inclined pipes should cover all the inclinations. It can be mainly divided into up-flow and down-flow conditions. From the perspective of physical model, the main difference is the direction of the gravitational force component in the flow direction and analysis on the effect of gravity force component on flow and heat transfer process. Before conducting comprehensive research of the downward slope conditions, the more specific case 45° for mechanistic research has been selected to obtain the basic mechanism of the special heat transfer law.27–31 Fig. 8 shows the temperature distribution inside the inclined tube at 45°. It can be seen from the figure that the temperature distribution law in the downward inclined tube is simpler than that in the upper inclined tube. During the entire flow, only one peak of wall temperature occurs in the middle of the tube, followed by a dip in temperature and eventually a steady rise. Fig. 9 shows the distribution of fluid section temperature and secondary flow in each section along the pipe. As can be seen from Fig. 9, in the previous stage of the curves, the rise in fluid bulk temperature is similar to the 45° condition, starts

Fig. 8

Wall and axis temperature distribution along the pipe.

Fig. 9 Fluid section temperature and secondary flow distribution in cross sections in 45°.

with the top wall, and gradually extends to the bottom wall. The overall performance shows the high temperature in the top part and the low temperature in the bottom part. In the vicinity of the center line, the hot fluid intrusion is deeper. The biggest difference between 45° and 45° conditions is the degree of intrusion of the central hot fluid. In contrast, Fig. 5 shows that the high temperature fluid at 45° condition rapidly intrudes into the interior under the effect of secondary flow and forms the second pair of vortexes. The whole process is rapid and leads to the fluid bulk temperature uniformity. In the condition of 45°, the fluid temperature near the central line is also higher, but the overall trend of high-temperature fluid diffusion downward is gentler. The secondary flow distribution can be seen in Fig. 9 too. Throughout the entire process, the cross-section secondary flow is symmetrical in the center line, and vortex center position remains essentially stable. Therefore, in the wall temperature distribution, the pipe under the condition of 45° maintains a steady rise in the segment of x/d < 60 and keeps a uniform rise in the entire cross section. The reason for this phenomenon is the effect of the buoyancy force in the flow direction. The difference between 45° and 45° conditions lies in the opposite effect of the buoyancy force in the flow direction. As what can be seen from the previous studies, when the buoyancy force direction is opposite to flow direction, the convective heat transfer will be weakened. Therefore, in 45° condition, the wall temperature increases faster and the temperature difference between inside and outside is larger, which leads to obvious secondary flow. For the 45° condition, when the buoyancy force direction is same with flow direction, it will promote the convective heat transfer. Slowly the temperature of fluid near wall rises and the fluid temperature inside will be uniformed under the turbulence effect. The temperature deviation will be smaller. In the same buoyancy force in the cross section, the effect of secondary flow will be weak. Fig. 10 shows Se number distribution along the pipe in 45°. Se indicates the intensity of the secondary flow, which increases slowly at x/d = 20–80 and starts to rise sharply at x/d = 80, reaches a maximum at x/ d = 115, enhancing heat transfer in the pipe. So the temperature uniformity of the fluid is improved and the heat transfer coefficient takes the maximum value at x/d = 115. In order to determine the main influencing factors of the heat transfer law in each part along the 45° pipe, the working condition only considering the gravity in flow direction has been calculated. The influence of secondary flow or thermal acceleration on the heat transfer under this condition can be judged. As can be seen from Fig. 11, at the entrance of experimental section, there is a clear peak of sudden temperature rise in the absence of the secondary flow. So the entrance is still

Fig. 10

Se number distribution along the pipe in 45°.

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics

1891

Fig. 11 Comparison between inclination which expressed with h of 30° and condition without G in section.

Fig.13 Density distribution in the cross sections of 45° condition.

the place where the secondary flow is most strongly affected. At x/d = 20–80, both of two maintained a steady rise. Although the secondary flow still exists in this position, due to the temperature distribution in the cross section is relatively uniform and the secondary flow is gentle, the influence on the wall temperature is limited. In the case of merely considering gravity in flow direction, the peak of wall temperature still appears at x/d = 80–100. Therefore, it can be inferred that the peak is due to other factors such as drastic physical property change and thermal acceleration effect besides the secondary flow. Fig. 12 intercepts the temperature distribution of each cross section in x/d = 70–100. It can be seen that the temperature distribution in the 45° pipe is characterized by a marvelous temperature difference between top and bottom of the pipe. The top of the pipe is uniformly heated and the temperature keeps rising while the bottom temperature of the pipe is always lower than the top. At x/d = 85–90, it can also be found obvious changes occur. Peak temperature suddenly rises in the central fluid, breaking the differences of top and bottom temperature. Then the cross-section temperature distribution tends to be uniform. It can be seen from Fig. 12 that the temperature of the fluid in bottom of the pipe is in the vicinity of the pseudo-critical point. r/R is the dimensionless radius, where R is the radius of the inner wall of the circular tube and r is the vertical location in the centerline of each cross-section. During the transcritical process, the density of RP-3 sharply decreases. As

shown in Fig. 13, in the bottom part of x/d = 80–100, the fluid density rapidly decreases and the volume expands. Therefore, the flow pattern at x/d = 85 will obviously deform in the middle and bottom parts. It is for this reason that the increase of the fluid volume hinders the secondary flow circulation in the whole cross section. The fluid near the wall is heated continuously and the wall temperature peak appears. Correspondingly, under the influence of thermal conductivity, the internal fluid also emerges local peak.

Fig. 12 Temperature distribution in the cross sections of 45° condition.

3.4. The influence of inclination on the heat transfer of supercritical RP-3 Fig. 14 shows the distributions of wall temperature along the pipe under the mass flow rate of 0.3 g/s, the heat flux of 300 kW/m2, the system pressure of 3 MPa. The inclination varies from 90° to 90°. The wall temperature is unevenly distributed on the wall of the tube, so the average value of the wall temperature can be used to represent the wall temperature. It can be seen that the heat transfer characteristics in the tubes under various inclination are different. When the inclination is 90°, the temperature of the pipe wall at the entrance is soaring that a typical heat transfer deterioration appeared, what means the wall temperature rising abnormally during the flow of supercritical RP-3. Previous studies on the convective heat transfer of supercritical RP-3 mainly focused on this condition. In the vertically upwardflow pipe, the effect of the buoyancy force along the flow

Fig.14

Wall temperature distribution in different inclinations.

1892

Z. TAO et al.

direction has no obvious effect on the temperature distribution law merely on the height of wall temperature. The downward buoyant force will reduce the fluid velocity difference in the cross section, thus inhibiting the development of turbulence in the pipe and adversely affecting the flow and heat transfer, resulting in higher wall temperature peak value than upward flow conditions. There is no other effect compared to the case of no buoyancy force. There is no component of gravity in the vertical flow direction at this moment, so the secondary flow will not appear in the cross section and isotropy appears in the pipe cross section. When the inclination angle is reduced to 45°, the effect of buoyancy force which is vertical to the flow direction appears. Due to the enhancement effect of the secondary flow on the heat transfer, the heat transfer deterioration at the inlet disappears and the wall temperature rises gently. Then undergoes two peaks. When the inclination angel decreases to 0°, the effect of buoyancy force which is vertical to the flow direction reaches the maximum. The wall temperature continues to increase gently, and the position of first peak moves backward. At the same time, the second peak disappears due to the high temperature uniformity of the fluid in the pipe. When the inclination angle continues decreasing, the flow direction turns down. At this time the effect of buoyancy force in the direction of flow or cross-section strengthens the convective heat transfer. It can be seen that the wall temperature peak value just appears at the entrance in 90° conditions. The wall temperature peak value of condition of 45° is also lower than condition of 45° and the position moves forward. Compared with condition of 90°, due to the secondary flow caused by the buoyancy force in cross section, the peak of wall temperature is significantly lower. Since then, the temperature of conditions of both 90° and 45° rises steadily and the peak of wall temperature no longer appears. Comparing the above conditions, it can be found that the effect of the secondary flow at the inlet of the pipe is stronger when the inclination angle is closer to 0° due to the effect of stronger buoyancy force. Then the wall temperature can keep a gentle rise. When the inclination angle is negative, the peak of the wall temperature will decrease and appear only once at the entrance section. The above analysis shows that the conditions of tilt-up and tilt-down follows completely different heat transfer law. They are analyzed in depth dividedly. Fig. 15 shows the distribution of the wall temperature along the condition of inclination angle 30°/40°/50°/60° respectively. It can be seen that in the

upward condition, the distribution of wall temperature basically remains the same. There will be two peaks in the whole process, then the wall temperature tends to unify regardless the value of inclination. But for different angle, the position and height of the peaks appear slightly different. As can be seen from the Fig. 15, larger the inclination is, earlier the first peak emerges and the higher the peak value is. In contrast, as the inclination increases, the gravity in flow direction gradually increases, while the component in the cross section decreases. So the buoyancy force acting on the opposite direction will be more obvious, which weakens the effect on flow heat transfer. The effect of the buoyancy force in the cross section will weaken and the strength of the secondary flow will also weaken so as to further impair the heat transfer and the rise of wall temperature. When the temperature increases, the temperature deviation between the fluid and pipe wall gradually increases. The density deviation between the fluid increases and the effect of the buoyancy force increases accordingly. Therefore, the large-angle pipe with a rapid increase in wall temperature will deteriorate and recover in advance. When the internal fluid temperature becomes lower, this cooling effect is slightly stronger than the small inclination situation. Although at the first peak of wall temperature, the peak value is higher when the angle is larger, but the opposite law occurs at the second peak of wall temperature. In this case, the wall temperature peak value is higher than the smaller angle. Above results show that when the first wall temperature peak is exceeded, the influence of the buoyancy force gradually diminishes, while the thermal acceleration effect begins to dominate. Fig. 16 shows the temperature distribution of inclined tube under the condition of 30°/40°/50°/60° along the pipe. It shows that the regular distribution characteristics are different with upward conditions. On the whole, when the flow direction is downward, the temperature distribution of the pipe wall appears a rapid rise in temperature at the beginning. After a small recovery, it rises steadily. When x/d > 60, the temperature increases more rapidly and reaches a wall temperature peak, then heat recovery and wall temperature drop into a steady state. Comparing the different inclinations, it can be seen that the wall temperature distribution curves are basically the same in most of the regions. Only when x/d is between 10 and 90, the greater the inclination, the lower the wall temperature is. But the overall trend is still completely identical. According to the analysis of the previous chapter, in the case of downward flow, since the fluid in the pipe has a strong

Fig. 15 Distribution of the wall temperature in different inclinations of 30°/40°/50°/60°.

Fig. 16 Distribution of the wall temperature in different inclinations of 30°/40°/50°/60°.

Numerical investigation on flow and heat transfer characteristics convection heat transfer capacity, the temperature distribution in the pipe is relatively uniform. And the secondary flow always maintains a steady development, which merely affects the quantity of the wall temperature. But there is small influence on the law of wall temperature distribution. As the inclination increases, the gravity component along the flow direction increases. When the gravity direction is downward, the buoyancy force plays a reinforcing role on convection heat transfer. Therefore, the greater the inclination, the lower the wall temperature becomes. To sum up, the influence of inclination on the flow and heat transfer of supercritical RP-3 follows different laws in different ranges. When the inclination angle is positive, the secondary flow which is mainly caused by buoyancy force plays a leading role in heat transfer. Therefore, the increase of inclination makes the gravity component in cross section decrease. And the effect of buoyancy force decreases. The increase of wall temperature accelerates and the peak of wall temperature appears ahead. In the latter half of pipeline, the influence of secondary flow decreases and thermal acceleration dominates. At this moment, the increase of inclination will mainly affect the turbulent flow in the pipe. But the influence law shows a clear stage. When the inclination is larger than 45°, the turbulent flow in the pipe suddenly increases and the peak value of the wall temperature decreases earlier and lower. When the inclination is less than 45°, the turbulent flow is weaker and the wall temperature increases. For the negative angle which means the downward flow, in the entire flow process except the inlet, the secondary flow will not have significant influence on the wall temperature. The distribution is more uniform and gentle. So the main effect of changing the inclination is to change the gravity component along the flow direction. It will enhance the heat transfer. Therefore when the angle increases, the wall temperature will reduce. 4. Conclusions This paper mainly focuses on the special flow and heat transfer characteristics under inclined conditions. The special laws that are different from the vertical and horizontal conditions in inclined conditions are studied in detail. The intrinsic mechanism is explored. The influence of inclination angles on the flow and heat transfer characteristics has been discussed. Main conclusions are as following. (1) At the inlet Reynolds number of 2400, wall heat flow of 300 kW/m2, when the inclined pipe is upward, there will be two peaks of the wall temperature. The main factor that affects the convective heat transfer in the first half of the pipeline is the buoyancy force. The secondary flow in the section resulting from it is the cause of the special law of convective heat transfer within the inclined pipe. There are two types of movement in the secondary flow: The effect of the secondary flow will be weakened with flowing and the thermal acceleration plays a dominant role gradually. The second peak appears due to the influence of turbulence. (2) When the inclined pipe is downward, the buoyancy force on the flow direction is same with the flow direction. So it always plays the role of promoting the convective heat

1893 transfer. The uniformity of the fluid in the pipe is good. The secondary flow in the cross section is weak and there is only one pair of vortices. There is only a temperature peak due to thermal acceleration. (3) The effect of the buoyancy force on the convective heat transfer is mainly achieved by the secondary flow under the inclined condition. The secondary flow is a kind of vortex. The vortex flux is introduced to describe the secondary flow strength. By integrating the absolute value of the vortex flux in the cross section and nondimensionalizing, the parameters that characterize the secondary flow strength Se have been obtained. (4) Inclination has impact on component of buoyancy force in the flow direction and the cross section. Increasing the inclination, the wall temperature of the first peak will appear in advance and the value increases too.

Acknowledgement The authors gratefully acknowledge funding support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51876005). References 1. Curran ET. Scramjet engines: The first forty years. J Propul Power 2001;17(6):1138–48. 2. Hank J, Murphy J, Mutzman R. The X-51A scramjet engine flight demonstration program. Reston: AIAA; 2008. Report No.:AIAA2008-2540. 3. Hu H, Qiang W. Calculation of wall temperature for aircraft exhaust system with considering gas radiation heat transfer. Chin J Aeronaut 2009;22(6):590–8. 4. Tao Z, Cheng Z, Zhu JQ, Li HW. Effect of turbulence models on predicting convective heat transfer to hydrocarbon fuel at supercritical pressure. Chin J Aeronaut 2016;29(5):1247–61. 5. Kanda T, Masuya G, Ono F, Wakamatsu Y. Effect of film cooling/regenerative cooling on scramjet engine performances. J Propul Power 1994;10(5):618–24. 6. Tao Z, Hu X, Zhu J, Cheng ZY. Numerical study of flow and heat transfer of n-decane with pyrolysis and pyrolytic coking under supercritical pressures. Energy Fuels 2017;31(8):8698–707. 7. Locke JM, Landrum DB. Study of heat transfer correlations for supercritical hydrogen in regenerative cooling channels. J Propul Power 2015;24(1):94–103. 8. Zhang H, He Y, Tao W. Numerical study of film and regenerative cooling in a thrust chamber at high pressure. Numer Heat Transfer 2007;52(11):991–1007. 9. Zhou W, Bao W, Yu DR, Duan YJ. Deterioration in heat transfer of endothermal hydrocarbon fuel. J Therm Sci 2011;20(2):173–80. 10. Hua YX, Wang YZ, Meng H. A numerical study of supercritical forced convective heat transfer of n-heptane inside a horizontal miniature tube. J Supercrit Fluids 2010;52(1):36–46. 11. Zeng W, Tong Z, Li S, Li HZ, Zhang L. Thermodynamic characteristic study of a high-temperature flow-rate control valve for fuel supply of scramjet engines. Chin J Aeronaut 2012;25 (4):559–65. 12. Liu B, Wang X, Zhu YH, Jiang PX. Experimental investigation of convection heat transfer of n-decane at supercritical pressures in small vertical tubes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2015;91(12):734–46. 13. Cheng Z, Tao Z, Zhu J, Wu HW. Diameter effect on the heat transfer of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel in horizontal tubes under turbulent conditions. Appl Therm Eng 2018;134:39–53.

1894 14. Shiralkar BS, Griffith P. Deterioration in heat transfer to fluids at supercritical pressure and high heat fluxes. J Heat Transfer 1968;91(1):67. 15. Wang Y, Li S, Dong M. Numerical study on heat transfer deterioration of supercritical aviation kerosene in vertical upward circular tubes. Tuijin Jishu/J Propul Technol 2015;36(1):97–103. 16. Tao Z, Cheng Z, Zhu J, Hu XZ, Wang LG. Correction of lowReynolds number turbulence model to hydrocarbon fuel at supercritical pressure. J Propul Technol 2018;77(6):156–67. 17. Zhang Q, Wang X, Liu G, Zhang XW, Hu SL, Ma XS. Inhibition mechanism of pyrolytic cokes from endothermic hydrocarbon fuels in regenerative cooling channels. J Propul Technol 2013;34 (12):1713–8. 18. Liang C, Wang Y, Jiang S, Zhang QY, Li XY. The comprehensive study on hydrocarbon fuel pyrolysis and heat transfer characteristics. Appl Therm Eng 2017;117:652–8. 19. Tao Z, Cheng Z, Zhu J, Lin DS, Wu HW. Large Eddy simulation of supercritical heat transfer to hydrocarbon fuel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018;121(6):1251–63. 20. Wu G, Bi Q, Wang H, Yang ZD, Zhu XJ, Hu ZD. Heat transfer characteristics of supercritical water in inclined upward tube. J Xian Jiaotong Univ 2011;45(5):6–11 [Chinese]. 21. Taklifi A, Hanafizadeh P, Behabadi MAA, Aliabadi A. Experimental investigation on heat transfer and pressure drop of supercritical water flows in an inclined rifled tube. J Supercrit Fluids 2016;107(1):209–18. 22. Zheng D, Yu W, Zhong B. RP-3 aviation kerosene surrogate fuel and the chemical reaction kinetic model. Acta Phys Chim Sin 2015;31(4):636–42 [Chinese]. 23. Cheng Z, Zhu J, Jin Z. Study on surrogate model of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel RP-3. J Aerosp Power 2016;31(2):391–8.

Z. TAO et al. 24. Zhang C, Xu G, Gao L, Tao Z. Experimental investigation on heat transfer of a specific fuel (RP-3) flows through downward tubes at supercritical pressure. J Supercrit Fluids 2012;72(9):90–9. 25. Song K, Wang L, Sun D. Convective heat transfer and absolute vorticity flux along main flow in a channel formed by flat tube bank fins with vortex generators mounted on both fin surfaces. J Enhanced Heat Transfer 2009;16(2):123–39. 26. Chang L, Wang L, Song K, Sun DL, Fan J. Numerical study of the relationship between heat transfer enhancement and absolute vorticity flux along main flow direction in a channel formed by a flat tube bank fin with vortex generators. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2009;52(7–8):1794–801. 27. Yan J, Zhu Y, Zhao R, Yan S, Jiang PX. Experimental investigation of the flow and heat transfer instabilities in n-decane at supercritical pressures in a vertical tube. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2018;120:987–96. 28. Feng Y, Cao J, Li X, Zhang SL, Qin J, Rao Y. Flow and heat transfer characteristics of supercritical hydrocarbon fuel in mini-channels with dimples. ASME J Heat Transfer 2017;139 (12):122401. 29. Zhang D, Feng Y, Zhang S, Zhang SL, Qin J, Rao Y. Quasi-OneDimensional model of scramjet combustor coupled with regenerative cooling. J Propul Power 2016;32(3):687–97. 30. Zhu Y, Liu B, Jiang P. Experimental and numerical investigations on n-decane thermal cracking at supercritical pressures in a vertical tube. Energy Fuels 2014;28:466–74. 31. Feng Y, Zhang S, Li X, Jiang Y, Qin J, Cao Y. Numerical study on the influence of heat and mass transfer on the pyrolysis of hydrocarbon fuel in mini-channel. Appl Therm Eng 2017;119:650–8.