NUMERICAL STUDY OF VISCOUSGAS FLOW IN THE WAKE OF A PLANE BODY* V. I. MYSHENKOV Moscow (Received
GAS flow in the wake behind Navier-Stokes velocities
equations,
17 May 1971)
a plate
of finite
at subsonic,
the Navier-Stokes The problem
step difference numbers, nature
equations,
a plate of finite at subsonic,
is solved
scheme
of the Lax-Wendroff
the temperature
factor,
the
flow
paper is an extension
and development
The computational
results
type.
explicit
The influence
two-
of the Re and M
of the open viscous
layer and the The appear-
in the flow are investigated.
agree qualitatively
with the available
The
theoretical
of the problem
the gas flow in the wake behind that the flow parameters
a plate
are specified
coordinate
from the bottom edge of the plate.
system)
of finite at infinity
The solution
in the upper quadrant
facilitate
as in 111, is mapped by the mapping rn . t o a rectangular
region
Mat. mat.Fiz.,
12, 3, 673485,
108
1972.
with respect
of the plane, 5 =
with coordinates ~-
under to
6, up-
will be sought by means
equations
integration,
thickness
and at some distance
of the Navier-Stokes
*Zh. urchisl.
using
of [l].
Formulation
t and 17(5, q is a rectangular
Y =11/1(Wf~) O
and small supersonic
data. 1.
the condition
is considered
in the wake, is considered.
of bottom separation
and experimental
method,
the thickness
of the gas, on the flow parameters
Consider
thickness
near-sonic
by the establishment
ance and development
stream
using
supersonic
(0.3 \< M ,< 2, Re = 100) and Pr = 0.71 and 1 ,< Re,< 1000 (at M =
flow velocities 0.3).
is considered
and small
(0.3 ,< M < 2, Re = 100) and Pr = 0.71 and 1 ,( Re < 1000 (at M = 0.3).
The gas flow in the wake behind using
thickness
near-sonic,
which,
to
E /1/( E” + 1)) 0 <
r <
1,
Numerical
study of viscous
109
gas flow
0.8 I R6 t
0
012
0.V
I
6
0.6
0.8
.T
FIG. 1.
The,non-stationary
equations
in the dimensionless and thermal
of motion and energy,
form, and the temperature
conductivity,
the equation
dependences
will be used in exactly
of state
of the viscosity
the same form as (1.2)-(1.4)
of [ll. The problem solution
exists
will be solved and is unique
by the establishment
under reasonably
method,
smooth boundary
assuming
that the
conditions.
A
left to right flow is assumed. The boundary (1)
p =
(2)
p = f&j,
(3)
u =
u =
y =
yu, 0 d
(4)
u =
conditions
i$ I dy =
1, L; =
are 0, e = e,
u = b(y), 0, e = 5 <
e,,
u = f3h),
s=1,o~Yyl;Y=1,o~
e =
f&(y) for t = 0, y. 5s y <
p is given by the equation
X0, 2 =
3u / ay =
for
X0, 0 <
de / dy =
of continuity
for
y < yll;
v = 0 for
Y=
0. 50 d
5 <
1.
1;
V. I. Myshenkov
110
Here, fi, i = 1, 2, 3, 4, are arbitrary the existence viscous
wall layer.
fi were constant,
For simplicity,
subscripts infinity).
of the plate
x and y velocity w and m denote
satisfying
it was assumed
equal to the corresponding
y0 are the x, y coordinates the density,
functions,
the conditions
e.g. the p, u, v and e distribution
of the solution,
surface
components, parameters
in the
in most computations
parameters (Fig.
for
functions
in the entrant
that the
flow;
x,,
l), and p, u, LI and e are
and internal
energy
respectively.
at the wall and in the entrant
The
flow (at
!t was previously mentioned in [l] that the flow symmetrization condition somewhat stabilizes the flow and is unjustified at large Re numbers, for which the flow becomes non-stationary (formation of Karman streets). Another point which remains valid is that regarding the statement of the boundary value of the density
when x = 1, O,< y< 1 111,
InitiaE conditions. in the computational however,
The initial region
to accelerate
values
the computation,
Re, Pr and M numbers,
of the field of variables
were originally
as initial
specified when solving
a problem
data we used the solution
The solution
will be regarded
the longitudinal the condition
as steady-state
velocity
components
(Here,
Later,
for specific
previously
for certain other vaiues of the characteristic parameters. are the Reynolds, Prandtl and Mach numbers.)
between satisfies
p, u, u, e
quite arbitrarily.
obtained
Re, Pr and M
if the norm of the difference
throughout
the computational
region
(I.11 Here, uk is the value the numerical
of u at the instant
The problem
will be solved
scheme
[2], approximating
second
order of accuracy
in detail
t = tilt, where At is the time step in
computation. by means
the initial O(h’).
of a Lax-Wendroff
system
of Navier-Stokes
The structure
of the difference
two-step
difference
equations
to the
scheme
is given
in fll.
Missing
fictitious
(at the plate surface) third degree.
values
of the variables
will be defined
by means
u, u and e at the region of polynomials
boundaries
of at least
the
2. Aspects of the method In order to select
the difference
scheme,
the problem
was initially
investi-
study
Numerical
gated by means differences)
of three explicit
with a staggered
Wendroff second-order of these
schemes
variety
The problem described,
schemes.
(Notice
was solved
111
scheme
that some previously
and internal
(one-sided
and Brailovskaya
been discovered,
of external
with an entrant
a first-order
schemes:
point distribution,
have lately
of problems
of viscous gas flow
[3] and Lax-
unknown
features
and have been used to solve
a
flow [4, 51.
by the establishment
air flow velocity
method in the statement
U = 100 m/set,
above
and temperatures to a Mach num-
0.71, which correspond
T,=T,=3OO”K,Re=lOO,Pr= ber M = 0.288. The computations similar
solutions,
wake.
On continuing
showed
involving
that,
at the initial
formation
ttu computation,
tion, the Brailovskaya values of the density
however,
to the appearance
values
of the mesh.
Similar in the recent densities vative
points
results
all three schemes
region
give
in the immediate
up to establishment
of the solu-
and ‘staggered” schemes give continuously decreasing on the rear wall in the neighbourhood of the corner. In
the long run, this leads at certain
stage,
of a back-flow
at the rear corner
paper [4].
of negative
were obtained
Here, the authors
in the computation
by using
and temperature
for the “staggered”
avoided
special
density
the appearance
boundary
scheme
of negative
conditions
in the conser-
form.
In [S], where problems scheme,
no such effects
M b2; action
of flow past blunt bodies
were observed
this can be explained of the smoothing
It may therefore operate giving becomes
badly
by insufficient
time and the fairly
that the “staggered”
with relatively
decreasing
strong
and Brailovskaya
weak rarefaction
density
values
“waves”
which are too low.
schemes
(M = 0.288), This effect
much more marked as M increases.
It is only the Lax-Wendroff creasing
computing
by Hrailovskaya’s
even at numbers
operator.
be concluded
in regions
monotonically
were solved
in the bottom region
density
to be unique
scheme
in the neighbourhood
when computing
that does not give monotonically
of the corner.
with different
initial
The solution
conditions
in the range 14 Re< 100. These results proved a decisive of the Lax-Wendroff scheme for solving our problem. Meshes
of the following
0.05, AX = 0.025 and
types
were used: Ax = hy = 0.05,
AX =
de-
was found
and Re numbers argument
in favour
Ay = 0.1, Ax = by =
hy = 0.025.
The time step was
V. 1. Myshenkov
112
found experimentally. obtained llatory,
With a mesh step Ax = Ay = 0.1, a stationary though the p, u, u and e distributions
quite quickly, especially
existence
with respect
of a saw-tooth
It is interesting
to the x coordinate;
solution
close to the limit of scheme stability, be observed; as At decreases, these At was always
this is explained
in second-order
to note in this context
solution
are strongly
schemes
that,
is
osci-
by the
[61.
given certain
values
of At
time oscillation of the variables may also oscillations disappear. In our computations,
below the limit of stability.
As the mesh steps Ax and Ay decrease, the amplitude of the oscillations drops considerably, while it increases somewhat as the Re number increases, especially
on the right-hand
is a maximum.
boundary,
The solution
time for mathematical
establishment
to the time for physical
accuracy
of the coordinates
substantially.
of the solution
establishment
We thus come up against tational
where the compression
time then increases
However,
corresponds
the
quite closely
of the flow process.
the contradictory
requirements
of improved
compu-
computing time, and the decision regarding these Flow computations with Re = 100 and M = 0.3 has to be based on a compromise. with different mesh steps showed that the solutions are convergent as Ax and Ay decrease.
and reduced
The divergences
between
the main flow parameters
in the wake
(pressure and longitudinal velocity) for the cases Ax = Ay = 0.05 and Ax = Ay = 0.025 amounted to 2-3%, i.e. to economize on time, the former, coarser mesh could be used for most computations. Due to the long computing with a step of less than 0.025 were not used. The smooth distribution by averaging determining
the final
of the variables
computational
the flow parameters
the right-hand A certain
boundary;
divergence
explained
by the insufficient
objective
assessment
Solution
time and the absence
“wave.”
Monotonically decreasing in the neighbourhood of the corner into the range of large M without
badly
greater
of
at the point x = 1.
data from those
of establishment
operates
The maximum error in
by the singularity
with Mach numbers
scheme
paper was obtained
with large Re in the neighbourhood
of the present
computing
of the instant
of the problem
even the Lax-Wendroff
data over x and y.
occurred
this is explained
quantitative
in the present
time, meshes
of [ll is
of a satisfactorily
in [l]. than 0.3 reveals
in the region
that
of the rarefaction
density values at the bottom wall appear here at M = 0.8, and it is impossible to move further modernizing
the scheme.
Numerical study of viscous The smoothing
operator
the same way as in
is introduced
gas flow
113
into the scheme
at each time step in
[sI:
(Fm,n)o = Fm,,+ e -& AF,,, and enables
the problem
to be solved
with M as high as M = 2.
vector F = (p, u, II, e), AF: R is the difference and 0 ,’ c< 0.2. Check computations
performed
analogue
with different
Here, F is the
of the Laplace
smoothing
coefficients
operator,
0 ,< t \<
0.5 with M = 0.8 and 1 showed an insignificant
change in the flow parameters for with M = 0.8 the main flow parameters in the wake (u and
small 6. For instance,
p) only differed by 2-4% as between 6 = 0 and t = 0.1. This enables smoothing operators to be used to obtain solutions with large M, though this device cannot be regarded coefficients
as a genuine answer to the problem. The minimum possible smoothing were employed: t = 0.1 and M = 0.8 and 1, and t = 0.2 with M = 2.
The introduction t = 0.1-0.2
into the computational
is in essence
equivalent
a term of higher order of smallness bound to have a slight The greatest
energy.
influence
scheme
to adding
of a smoothing
to the initial
than the dissipative on the solutions
differential
terms.
of the equations
error may occur when solving
operator
the equation
This
with
equations is naturally
of motion and of continuity,
due to the absence of dissipative terms, and notably, in those regions where the viscous forces are fairly high. In this case the over-all error in solving the difference
system
of Navier-Stokes
equations
also increases.
3. Results Wake flows ere investigated types
of gas, and the influence
T lo, m = condition
for different
Re and M numbers
on the flow parameters
and different
of the temperature
factor
and the thickness of the viscous layer (left-hand boundary TWIT, fi). Perfect gases were investigated, most of the computations being
performed for air. As the characteristic magnitudes of the problem were taken the entrant flow parameters and the length I,, proportional to half the thickness of the rectangle ;: L = 1.733 1; Pr = 0.71. Solutions
were obtained
for the following
values
of the characteristic
para-
meters:
1, T, =3OO”K, 1
Tw,
m
=
V. 1. Myshenkov
114
(2) Tw... = 1,T, = 300"K,Re = 100,0.3< M < 2, Ax= Ay = when investigating the influence con&, air, helium and propane: 0.05, fi = of the M number and type of gas; (3)
0.6
0.05, fi =
<
2,T, = 300"K, Re = 100,M = 0.3, Ax =Ay =
con&, air:
when investigating
the influence
of the temperature
factor;
K, Re = 100, M = 0.3, Ax= Ay = (4) T,, m = 1, T, = 300" air: when investigating the influence of the left-hand 0.05, fi = variable, boundary
condition
The thermal Dependence throughout ‘1
Yt
(the thickness and physical
of the transport that Sutherland’s
6 of the viscous
parameters
layer).
of the gases
factors
on pressure
formula
applied.
was ignored:
=2 0.6
were taken
from [7, 81.
it was assumed
*=2 0.6
-
0.1
u=0.3
@iz$ -0.08
;c,
F
=2
0.6
-
7
FIG. 2.
1. Influence of the Re number. The computations
showed that the wake flow behind a plate with Reynolds numbers Re ,( 1.7 and M = 0.3 is of the unbroken type. With Re = 1.7 quite a large low-velocity region appears round the rear critical point; this transforms, as the Re number increases, into a reverse
sludy of viscous
Numerical
gas flow
115
M
FIG. 3.
U6-
lg Re FIG. 4. flow region,
causing
the flow to break up at the bottom.
The viscous
then such that the flow near the sharp edge turns through a break; the break (the start of the separating streamline
forces
are
a right angle without I/I = 0) occurs at the
bottom of the plate (and not at the corner). The possible predicted Stokes’
existence
in 191, on the basis
equations
experimentally
of a break in the flow below the corner of a qualitative
for the neighbourhood
at supersonic
failed to be obtained, enough.
because
speeds
study of the analytic
of a singular
in [lp,
111; here,
the experimental
point,
was earlier solution
of
and was investigated
a convincing
confirmation
data were not analyzed
exactly
As the Re number increases further the size of the backward flow region increases, and the flow break shifts upwards relative to the plate bottom, towards
V. 1. Myshenkov
116
0
0
1
0.2
0.4
1 u
b
FIG. 5. the corner (see Figs. Re of the coordinates
2, a and 3, a, showing the streamlines y*, x* of the break point at M = 0.3).
and the variation with The break coordinate
y*, measured along the bottom wall, was found by extrapolating the stream function Ifi and longitudinal velocity component u; when $ and u are small, such extrapolation
can lead to a serious
error in determining
ye.
Similar results regarding break displacement as Re varies (for a developed break) were obtained in the recent paper [4], on the basis of a numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes The instant
equations,
primarily
when the break appears
of the bottom pressure
p, (the pressure
then sharply
(see Fig. 4, a).
increases
for an incompressible is most clearly
at the centre
revealed
of the plate
The determination
fluid. by the behaviour bottom),
of the instant
which of break-
ing from the change of sign of the longitudinal velocity component is less accurate, due to the low velocities in the wall zone, which are at this instant comparabie with the computational error. In the long run, this leads to the determination of a later instant of breaking (relative to the Re number), see Fig. 4, a. Figure 5, a shows the variation of the longitudinal velocity component in the plane of flow symmetry at M = 0.3 with different Re numbers. It can be seen from the curves that, as Re increases, so do the magnitudes of the backward velocities as well as the size of the backward flow region.
Numerical study of viscous gas flora It can be seen from Fig. 5, b that the pressure most strongly
at low Re numbers,
number increases smooths
flow region
out and at Re = 100 becomes
corner that a significant
at the plate bottom varies
when the flow is still
and a backward pressure
117
unbroken.
As the Re
forms, the pressure
almost
constant.
drop occurs,
distributions
It is only at the plate
due to the rarefaction
“wave.”
As the Re number increases the pressure at the centre of the plate bottom (the bottom pressure) remains virtually unchanged with the instant of breaking, after which it rises
sharply
(Fig.
4, a).
up to Re = 1000, the bottom pressure qualitative
agreement
non-stationary.
in the norm of the difference
during the computation. component property
obtained
it.
The values
at different
But in spite
was detected. amplitude
perceptible
is explained
with completely
process
2. Influence
of the backward
flow regions.
The influence
2, b and 3, b).
region
meantime
A further
The relative
changes increase
somewhat
Some
Re numbers
of the M number was investi-
The computations
showed
u distribution
that, as
and narrows
in the dissipative
while the maxima of u remain virtually
to M 3 I causes
tion of the back flow region {Figs.
5, a).
flow region elongates
velocity
has a small
smoothly as a function p, at infinity, with a
flow region (Fig.
M,< 2, at Re = 100.
flow
is given in Fig. 4, a.
with different
from 0.3 to 0.8, the backward
(Figs.
steady-state
time, no vortex break
curves
of the M number.
gated in the range 0.34 M increases
in the pressure sizes
velocity
the bottom pressure
value
minimum in the backward
by the different
is (1.1)
and longitudinal
the computation
and its time-averaged
behaviour
At
oscillation
u in expression
The pressure in the plane of flow symmetry varies of x, from the pressure p0 at the bottom to the pressure scarcely
in
fluid.
also throw light on the non-stationary region,
of prolonging
of oscillation
vectors
of the pressure
instants
During the computational
lack of monotonic
of the Re number, monotonically,
A periodic
between
of the flow in the dissipative
outside
increase
to increase
with the data of [12] for an incompressible
Re = 1000 the wake flow becomes observed
On further
continues
both a widthwise
and lengthwise
2, b and 3, b) and obviously
leads
fixed. contrac-
to break-
less flow at some M > 2 (with Re = 100). An increase the flow, delaying
of M (with M >, 1) thus proves the appearance
with M = 1 the flow remains 0.3 quite a developed point is that,
breakless
back-flow
if the computational
to have a stabilizing
of a break behind
effect
results
at Re = 10.
are processed within
on
For instance,
at Re = 10 or even 15, whereas
region was observed
meter MRe es , the bre ak will commence
the plate.
with M =
An interesting
as a function
of the para-
quite a narrow range of this para-
118
V. 1. Myshenkov
meter, namely
0.3 to 0.355,
for the range of M numbers
investigated
(here,
L = 0.
FIG. 6. From Fig. 4, b, as M increases, The variation contraction
of the dissipative
from the edge);
as mentioned
above,
bottom centre also affected
displacement
this displacement
influence
and the influence
at the plate
with M is here probably
region (downward
With Re > 100, this spurious be avoided,
the pressure
of this bottom pressure
of the break point
leads
to a drop in pressure.
of break zone contraction
of M on the bottom pressure
falls. by
can obviously in the Upure”
examined
form. With Re = 100, the pressure same trend as M increases change
occurs
tonic variation slightly
from monotonic (Fig.
5, b).
below the cotner,
The pressure
variation
distribution small
break-away pressure
(as compared zone,
With M $1,
variation
to substantial
a minimum pressure
region
the i.e. a
non-monoappears
with the data of f131.
with x in the wake has the same monotonic As M increases,
with the p(x) curves
apparently
~-distribution
pressure
in agreement
for all M in the range 0.3 < M 6 2. pressure
on the plate bottom reveals
as in the case M = 0.3 when Re decreases,
caused
M >/ 1, a region
is not monotonic
of increased
for other M < 1) forms behind
by the compression in the different
ally for large M, the pressure becomes virtually flow region even with M = 2 (Fig. 6, Re = 100).
tail wave.
the
While the
wake sections,
independent
character
especi-
of y in the back-
Numerical
3.
influence
study
of the type of gas.
used to investigate
this influence,
of viscous
Three
gases,
helium,
distributions
longitudinal
etc) remain the same,
velocity
contraction
of the back-flow
is most pronounced lowering
distributions
For instance,
in the series region
in the wake (i.e.
propane
in length
as the Mach number increases,
O-
-O.l-
-0.2-
-LX?-
-0.4-
I
0.2
0.4
with only slight
- - air - - helium,
and
quantitaa slight
This trend
at M = 2. There
is also a
below the bottom wall.
0’
^^
were
the pressure
and width is observed.
of the point at which the flow breaks
vJ.Y
air and propane,
at Re = 100 and with 0.3 < M < 2; it was
found that the main flow parameter tive variations.
119
gas flows
1
0.6 a
0.8
x
1
0.4
0.6 b
0.8
x
1
FIG. ‘i.
The bottom pressure
variations
with M for the different
gases
can be seen
in Fig. 4, b. The pressure like the longitudinal
on the wall and in the back-flow velocity
u, for propane
(curve
region
proves
1) than for air (2) or helium
influence of the temperature factor Fw m. The influence was investigated for Re = 100: M = 0.3, and T, T, o3 = T,/T, 4.
varying
the wall temperature
in the range 160-600°K,
to be greater,
of this factor = 300°K, by i.e. the temperature factor
(3).
V. 1. Myshenkov
120
varied
in the range 0.6 \< ?;,
The computations little
effect
certain
m < 2.
showed
that the temperature
on the flow parameters,
types
of variation
and notably,
do become
apparent.
factor variation
on the bottom pressure, though As the temperature factor increases,
the bottom pressure and the pressure in the dissipative region larly, we find the same variation of the backstream velocities, connection
of these
with the bottom pressure
The computations temperature
factor,
of the break-away The behaviour seems
revealed
probably
The variation
fall sIightly. Simirevealing a direct
7, a).
in the back flow region
of the closeness
with the
of the right-hand
boundary
point x = 1.
in viscosity,
as the temperature and hence
factor
a reduction
increases
in the local
region.
with Tw cDof the dimensionless
heat transfer
characteristic,
number Nu, where
4T,,m--3Tm.,-Tm--i,n _ 3) s7 (1 2Ax(l+(y- l)M2/2T,,,)T,
Nan,, = a dependence
bottom.
The slight
(Cu, 0) of small
quantities
5.
(Fig.
of the main flow parameters
number in the dissipative
the Nusselt
gives
because
zone to the singular
to be due to an increase
Reynolds
no change
has relatively
of the form
. at the centre of the plate
fall in Nu at FU m = 1 away from the general
is explained
Influence
NU - F$$5
by the influence
in the computational of the viscous
of the error in the solution
law
NU -;: f
during
division
formufa.
layer thickness
6.
The influence
of the viscous
layer thickness 6 on the left-hand boundary of the computational region fi was investigated at Re = 100, WI= 0.3 on viscous layers of the sinusoidal and breakaway types. The break-away profile was taken as U,,, = 0 for n 6 n, + 6 and = 1 for n > n, + 6, where 6 is the thickness of the viscous layer y = Ay, y. = uO,il n&y. The distributions of the remaining variables (p, u, e) for the cases fi were assumed to be identical with those used above. The computations revealed only a slight change of bottom pressure as the viscous layer thickness increased, even for the case of a break-away profile; this agrees with the results of [41. As 6 increases the pressure distribution on the wall smooths out and becomes constant. Variation of 6 has most effect on the velocity distribution in the back-flow region, especially near the right-hand boundary, towards which the centre of the continuously increasing vortex moves
Numerrcal
as 6 increases backward
(Fig.
7, b).
velocities
The
pressure
increases, (Fig.
meantime A picture
in Fig.
8.
on the lateral
when
a barrier
The
(near
the bottom
wall),
the
virtually
shows
which
becomes
of the vortex
constant
an increasing
with
more marked
centre.
variable
deviation
The
size
6
as x
as 6 increases of the back-flow
increases.
of the streamlines
Clearly,
region
remains
wall,
minimum,
in the region
also
even section
which
of the bottom
and a pressure
121
gas flou
as 6 increases.
distribution,
7, b), appears
region
In the near-wake
decrease
in the neighbourhood
stud? o/ viscous
with
such
surface
of height
for the break-away an exotic
of the plate.
y = Shy
boundary
profile
In practice,
is mounted
with 6 = 4 is seen
fi,
condition this
on the plate
type surface
break-away
occurs
of flow is realized in the cross-
x = 0. author
thanks
B. S. Kirnasov
for useful
discussions.
Translated
by D. E. Brown
REFERENCES 1.
MYSHENKOV, V. I. Subsonic and transonic viscous gas flow in the wake of a flat body, lzu. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekhan. Zhidkosti i Gaza, 2, 73-79, 1970.
V. I. Myshenkov
122 2.
THOMkIEN, H. U. Math. Phys.
3.
Numerical
integration
17, 5, 369384,
BRAILOVSKAYA,
I. YU.
A difference
scheme
sional non-stationary Navuer-Stokes Akad. Nauk SSSR, 160,5, 1042-1044,
4.
ROACHE,
P. J. and MUELLER,
incompressible 5.
PAVLOV, Gaza,
Navier-Stokes
3, 128-133,
GODUNOV,
7.
I. F.
smeseil,
8.
Viscosity
Fizmatgiz,
S. H.
flow field,
Properties
Experimental
11.
DONALDSON,
I. S.
13.
ERDOS,
of compressible
68-741,
Nauk SSSR,
Introduction
and Gas Mirtires
of Substances
and
1968. using the
Mekhan.
to the theory skheml,
Zhidkosti
i
of Finite
Fizmatgiz,
(Vyazkost’
gazov
studies
(Teplofizicheskie
Moscow-Leningrad,
points
Moscow,
i gazovykh
veshchestv),
near wake
1968.
on the lip shock,
On the separation
svoistva 1956.
in the laminar two-dimensional
of a supersonic
AIAA J.,
6, 2, 212-219,
1968.
flow at a sharp corner, AIAA J.,
1967.
A,, et al., Further experiments on steady J. Fluid Mech. 34, 1, 25-48, 1968.
J. and ZAKKAY,
V..
the mixed supersonic/subsonic with experimental
two-dimen-
1962.
Mech. 33, 1, 38-63,
HAMA. F. R.
ACRIVOS, objects,
V. S.
Gosenergoizdat,
10.
12.
solutions
v teoriyu raznoatnykh
On the singular
J. Fluid
5, 6, 1086-1088,
Z. Angew.
gas, Dokl.
flow past blunt bodies,
lzu. Akad.
of Gases
Moscow,
The Thermo-physical
WEINBAUM,
numerically
for a compressible
AIAA Paper,
of supersonic
equations,
(Vvedenie
ed. N. B. Vargaftik, 9.
equations,
1968.
Schemes
GOLUBEV,
Numerical
flows,
S, K. and RYABEN’KII,
different 1962.
for solving
equations 1965,
T. J.
separated
B. M. Computation
complete
6.
laminar
of the Navier-Stokes
1966.
separated
flows
past bluff
Numerical solution of several steady wake flows of type by a time-dependent method and comparison
data, AIAA Paper,
69-649,
1969.