Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
OBSERVATIONS ONTHERUUUTION OF DNABIOSYNTHESIS Eugene H. Gogol* and Eugene Rosenberg Department of Bacteriology, University of California Los Angeles 24, California
Received
December
30,
1963
It has been established that bacteria not incorporate
radioactive
in stationary
thymidine into DNA (see Lark, 1963).
Three of the possible explanations for the failure thymidine in stationary
phase have been considered:
DN4 polymeraae, (2) depletion nucleoside triphosphates,
phase do
to incorporate (1) inactive
of one or more of the deoxyribo-
and (3) non-functionality
of DNAas a
primer. Experiments with E. co11 starved of an essential amino acid (Billen, Guttes,
1962) and the slime mold g. polycephalium (Guttes and 1961) were interpreted
to indicate
that factors
other than
the enzyme and substrate were responsible for the regulation DNA synthesis. ability
This commmicatiou reports on the relative
of DNA in sonicatee of stationary
to funotion as an active
of in-
phase Pfyxococcus xanthus
primer for DNAsynthesis.
MAUTBRIALS AND MTBODS. 5. xanthus** were grown 2% casitone (generation t5me, 5 hr.),
at 30°C in aerated
harvested by centrifugation,
washed in 0.01 H phosphate buffer, to give a final
0.D.560 ~
pH 7.0, and resuspended in buffer of 20 (20 x 109 cells/ml). Sonicates from
log phase were obtained from cultures which had reached an 0.D.
560 qu
*Participant in the NSFUndergraduate Saience Education Program #E3/3/43-1233. t*A culture of strain PB of 5 xauthus was kindly supplied by M. Dworkiu. 565
Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964 of
0.9.
BIOCHEMICAL
gonicatee
whose
from
etatfouary
0.1). had remained
(final
phase
constant
for
were
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
obtained
at least
from
cultures
two generation
times
O.D. = 2.5). Ten ml suspensions
node1
g-75
(final
gonlfier
by the conversion nucleotides. (one-tenth
log
Analyses scale)
DNA and KNA (Diache,
1955)
DNA* was isolated
the method
of Harmur
by the method
(1961).
of Kirby
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. stationary
phase
dGTP,
TTP,
and houologous
crude
DNA polyuerase
DNA polymerase
EJ xanthus
of g.
the radioactivity
1 demonstrates
effective
than
the
of the curve,
slope
stjmulated there
sonicate
to the exteni were
50-60
was determined soluble
(Lmry,
log
phase
was a gift
cells
of Dr.
J.
by added
like
1958).
Ninety-five
insoluble
In these
product
homologous
DNA in stimulating
of approximately cpm incorporated
CG
eubtllis
P&e. of dATP,
respects,
the well
the studied
percent
was solubilited
of by
DNA was more From
DNA synthesis 8 cpm/pg
with
added
no added
and had a M.U.
566
Kg++,
DNA synthesis.
may be seen thet
69%
to
of DNA by sonlcates
behaved
+The & m DNA contained 2 x 106 (unpublished results).
1951).
from Bacillus
xanthus
added
of
according
1).
that
oligo-
et al.,
DNA (Table
(Lehman,
it
of the
the determination
was stimulated
of the acid
DNAase. Fig.
for
The synthesis
of 5
cells.
KNA, extracted
(1956),
demonstrated
out by micrasodifications
methods
from
30 seconds
a modification
and protein
k& xanthus
for
DNA to acid
carried
of existing
probe
DNAase activity
insoluble
were
in a Brauson
examinations
using
procedure.
of acid
broken
and stationary
was assayed
(1958)
inch
Microscopic
in both
DNA polymerase
were
a one-half
5°C).
brealcage
Lehman et al.
of the cells
with
temperature
complete
Since
AND BIOPHYSICAL
was DNA.
DNA, one
of approximately
Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPI-IYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Table 1 Requirements for DNASynthesis
Complete system*
Incorporation of dATP-8-C14 (cpm) 155*
minus TTP minus dGTP
71 28
minus dCTP minus TTP, dGTP, dCTP minus Mg++ minus added DNA minus added DNA+ 9 ug RNA
28 10 5
Components
87 a9
Womplete system contains glycine buffer, pR 9.0, 20 um; MgC12, 2 p; P-mercaptoethanol, 0.3 um; TTP, dATP, dGTP, and dCTP each 5 uum; DNA, 9 ug; dATP-8-C", 5.65 p&m, 16,000 cpm; and stationary sonicate, 0.15 ml (53 mg protein/ml), all in 0.3 ml; incubation time 15 minutes at 37oc. *Incorporation at zero tfrPe has been subtracted,
0
I 0
I 4
I Added
I 8 DNA t p 9)
I
I 12
I
Fig. 1. Stimulation of DNAsynthesis by added DNA. The assay system is identical to that described in Table 1 except that the quantities of added DNAwere varied. The curve represents experiments done on stationary aonicates prepared at 3 different times, all adjusted to contain 7Oug sonicate DNA. 567
I 16
Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964 would
predict
stationary that
that
the sonicates
regard that
than
stationary
Fig. (1:4
approximately
However,
chemical
contained
to priming log
analysis
70 2 3 pg DNA.
activity.
phase
Preliminary
sonicate
phase
the specific
DNA is
sonicate that
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
7 ug DNA in
DNA is approximately
2 demonstrates
dilution),
AND BIOPHYSKAL
were
sonlcate
revealed the
there
sonicates.
the stationary with
BIOCHEMICAL
This
the
demonstrated suggests
that
902 nonfunctional experiments
a more active
have
primer
DNA.
at a concentration activities
of 3 mg protein/ml
of DNA Polymerase
of the
TIME (MIN)
of DNA synthesis by sonicates of stationary and Fig. 2. The kinetics The assay system was as described in Table 1 log phase g. xanthus. except that excess salmon sperm DNA (32 pg) and ATP (0.5 ~1111)were Multiple amounts were used and 0.5 ml aliquote were withdrawa added. Dilutions of the sonicates were msde with .Ol H at various times. phosphate buffer. 568
BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964 stationary
and log
phase
failure
of the resting
simply
to the absence Increasing
incubation
result
from
from
to synthesize
the
DNA can not be attributed
of log
phase
sonicates
3 to 12 mg protein/ml
in the rate
result
of DNA synthesis
in the in approximately
(Fig.
2).
However, sonicates
in the concentration
of stationary
phase
in approximately
a twofold
in rate.
In similar
it
was found
with
that
increasing
increased
protein
Therefore,
identical.
of DNA polymerase.
decrease
of dATP-8-C 14 incorporation
the rate
concentrations
O-24 mg protein/ml,
activity
are
increases
experiments increased
cells
increase
identical
sonicates
the concentration
mixtures
a threefold
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
while
from
of log
in stationary
phase
phase
O-3 mg/ml and then
sonicates
sonicates,
decreased
the
at higher
concentrations. The inhibition
of DNA polymerase
trations
could
activity
of DNAase in log phase
stationary
at the higher
not be due to DNAase activity
phase
soricates
sonicates
under
protein
since is
the conditions
the
slightly
concen-
specific higher
used
than
to assay
for
the DNA polymerase. In conclusion of n. xanthus (1) measured (2) which
is (3)
activity
it
has been
that
stationary
sonicates
contain:
As active
a DNA polymerase
at low protein an inhibitor not expressed DNA which for
observed
as log
phase
sonicates
if
concentrations, for
the DNA polymerase
in log
phase
sonicates,
is 90% nonfunctional
with
system
(not
DNAase)
and respect
to priming
DNA polymerase.
Billen, D., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Ccuss. 1, 173 (1962). Dische, Z., in E. Chargaff and J. N. Davidson, The Nucleic -p-t Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1955, p. 285. 569
Acids
Vol. 14, No. 6, 1964
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
Guttes, E. and Guttes, S., Proc. Am. Sot. Cell Biol., p. 79 (1961). 405 (1956). Kirby, K. S., Biochem. J. 3 Genetics, Lark, K. G., in J. Ii. Taylor, Progress &Molecular Part I, Academic Press, New York, 1963, p. 153. Lehman, I. R., Bessman, H. J., Sims, E. S., and Kornberg, A., J. Biol. Chem. 233, 163 (1958). Lowry, 0. H., Rosanbrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J., J. Biol. Chew, l!I3, 265 (1951). Marmur, J., J. Mol. Biol. 3 208 (1961).
570