Occurrence of free nicotinic acid in the liver of nicotinamide-injected rats

Occurrence of free nicotinic acid in the liver of nicotinamide-injected rats

Vol. 17, No. 1, 1964 BIOCHEMICAL OF FREE OCCURRENCE AND BIOPHYSICAL NICOTINIC RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS ACID IN THE LIVER NICOTINAMIDELINJECTED ...

277KB Sizes 0 Downloads 55 Views

Vol. 17, No. 1, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL

OF FREE

OCCURRENCE

AND BIOPHYSICAL

NICOTINIC

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

ACID IN THE LIVER

NICOTINAMIDELINJECTED C. Ricci Istituto

Received

di

Chimica

liver

menon (Kaplan

about

less

the

a scheme

involved

has been

accepted

that

the

mediates

(Langan

described liver,

et al.,

(Sarma to in

the

in

the

vitro

by rat

of NAc are

the

NAD syn=

This

the

that

path=

liver

of

is

NAm

NAD pro=

present

in human as inter=

NAm deamidation

at

preparations however

it

NAm conversion

or in viva.

recent=

now widely

NAc-nucleotides

liver

observa=

More

to hepatic

et a1.,1961); detect

mouse

the

and it

1959).

of

NAD biosynthetic

from

similar

involves

level

possible

for

followed

The same pheno=

promoting

NAm conversion

which

mononucleotide

rat

Siena

NAD content

doses

reported,

a pathway

erythrocytes,

the

is

et'a1.,1956).

of Des-NAD

mice

been

di

NMN as an intermediate.

isolation

through,

rat

described

NAm in

(Kaplan

injected ceeds

in

Equimolecular

than

liver

suggested the

been

1956).

effective in

IO-fold

the

and Ricci,1949).

subsequently

way which ly,

of

et al.,

thesis

of NAm to

(Bonsignore

has

tion

V. Pallini

June 25, 1964

by an increase

far

RATS

Biologiqa dell'Universit& Siena (Italy)

The administration the

and

OF

the

has been has not to

yet

NMN by

The NAm deamidase

EC=

The work was supported by Research Grant GM 0979101 from the National Institutes of Health and by C.N.R. Impresa Enzimologia. Abbreviations: NAm,Nicotinamide; NAc, acid; NAD,Wicotinamide-Adenine-Dinucleotide; tinanide Mononuoleotide; Des-NAD, Nicotinic Des-N&m, Nicotinic acid nine-Dinucleofido; tide.

34

Nicotinic NMN,Nico= acid-Ade= Mononucleo=

Vol. 17, No. 1, 1964

tivity,

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

reported

to be absent

previously

(Rajagopalan present

et

in

al.,

an inhibited

The inhibition

is

(Greengard

form

released

of NAc have

NAm-treated

mice

were

the

the

rat

level

reaches

a maximum

at were

strain,

were

injected

from

all

Two rats

prepared (1954).

for

in

the

a curve

which

female

laboratory wt.

100 ag of

and determined

by paper

within

were

sacrificed

acid

extracts

at from

water a short

each

time

8 g of

neutralized

extract

NAD (Holzer

et

using

procedure

a 250 ml mixing

of

interval.

al.,

was kept

a1.,1958).

6 g of liver

on a 1 x 12 cm column the

period

et

the

following

so that

was

of

to

supplied

liver

An aliquot

corresponding

the

schedule

of Hurlbert

of

pur= chromate=

After

on a time

NAm

to be free

systems.

decapitated

The

NAm was

and only

of

130

diet.

with

compounds

rats

between

procedure

mesh,

a1.(1954),

in=

the

aliquot

in

greatly

to

chromatographed 200-400

is

ranging

solvent

assay

exper= that

according

an enzymatic

A second

A.G.,

were made

Percloric

liver

on adult

was withdrawn

were

quantitative

to find

100 Q of body

two different

rats

able

of

8 th hr .

pyridine

Injections

time.

be

liver

sensitive

and follows

a standard

Merck

food

the

been

a weight

per

the

injection, freely.

to

the

but

intraperitoneally

contaminating in

in

a more

conducted

with

10% solution)

graphy

liver

hypophysectomy

NAc in

the

and 150 g : and fed

from

found

a1.,1959),

NAm injection,

Experiments

chased

rat

et a1.,1963)o

detected

Using

of free

after

Wistar

et

we have

creased

(as

(Retrack

been

lacking.

procedure,

rats

now been

after

(Langan

still

imental

the

has

in

et a1.,1963).

Traces data

1960),

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

was

of Dowex 1 (HCOO-) of Hurlbert

chamber

et

and 4N HCOOH

reservoir. The NAm was washed

away from

35

the

column

with

water,

Vol. 17, No. 1,1964

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

and was determined in this fraction by the method of Hughes and Williamson (1953). As checked by chromate= graphy on Whatman 1 in the solvent C of Preiss and Handler (1958), at each time interval after injection of NAm, NAm is the tertiary pyridine compound present in the water eluate. In addition, there are slight traces of quaternary pyridine derivatives which do not interfere appreciably in the method of Hughes and Williamson. NAc was eluted from the Dowex 1 column together with NAD. In order to separate NAc from MD and its hydrolytic products, the fractions in the peak were pooled, lyophylized and taken up in 1 ml of water. Aliquots corresponding to 1.5 g of liver, were chromate= graphed on Whatman 31 paper using n-butanol:water as the descending solvent with l$ ammonia on the bottom of the jar. Under these conditions NAc migrated with a Rf of about 0 .330 The region of the paper correspond= ing to NAc, as revealed on a adjacent lane by the method of Kodiceck and Reddi (1951), was cut out and eluted with 4 ml of 0.1 N HCl with the descending technique. The eluates were brought to pH 6-7 and NAc was determined by the method of Hughes and Williamson. Under these conditions the material elutea from the paper gave the A350/A370 ratio of 0.6 which is charac= teristic of NAc. Known amounts of NAc were run through the separation procedure and NAc was recovered with a yield of 957100$. Des-NAD was eluted from the column with a higher HCOOH concentration, and was determined by its reaction with KCN (Lamborg et a1,,1958). The content of NAc of the liver at various times after NAm injection is reported in the Table I. The value shown at zero time was obtained from normal rats and is near the lower limit of the assay 36

Vol. 17, No. 1,1964

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

TABLE I NBC and other pyridine compounds in the liver of NAm treated rats. (Value5 expressed as poles/g of fresh tissue) Des-NAD NAD Hours after NAm NAc injection 0.22 0 .OOl 0.010 0.49 0 2 8' 12 16 24

5.14 5.00 4.34 1.90 1.03 0.10

0.034 0.040 0.068 0.062 0.005 0 .OOl

0.234 0.265 0.241 0.232 0.047 0.022

1.58 2.92 2.56 5.60 3.08 0.62

method. The administration of NAm is very soon followed by a rise in the NAc level and this amounts to a 70fold increase after 8 hr. The values and the time curves for the other compounds are in close agreement with the data from other authors (Langan et a1.,1959; Greengard et al. ,196l). The time curves for NAc and NAD follow a similar pattern. A sharp increase is noted iavmdiately after NAm administration, with a peak from the 8th to the 12th hr, followed by a sharp decrease to normal values. On the other hand, the curve of NAm shows an earlier maximum. It can be noted that the maximum level of free NAm around the 2nd hr almost equals the maximum level reached by NAD at the 12 th hr e The isolation of NAc from the liver of NAm-injec= ted rats further substantiates the conversion of NAm to NAD through desamidated compounds. The involvement of NAc in NAD biosynthesis is clearly indicated by the fact that its level in the liver is relatively high during the time when NAD is being synthesized. After the 12th hr it drop5 to lower values. The same can be noted for Des-NAD. The eventual accumulation of free NAc can be ex= plained by assuming that the deamidation of NAm occurs 37

Vol. 17, No. 1, 1964

BIOCHEMICAL

AND BIOPHYSICAL

RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

at a higher rate than the reaction of NBC with %phos= phoribosyl-I-pgrophosphate. In fact, it has been re= cently reported by Imsande (1964) that the specific activity of rat liver Des+NMN pyrophosphorylase is relatively low as compared to that of other biological systems. We wish to thank Mr M.Bari assistance.

for

highly

skilled

REFERENCES Bonsignore A.and Ricci C.,Boll.Soc.It.Biol.Sper. 25, 710,(1949) Greengard P.,Kalinsky H.J.and Petrack Be, Biochim. Biophys.Acta %,408,(1961) Greengard P., Petrack B., Craston A. and Kalinsky H.J., Biochem.Biophys.Res~Comm.~,478,(1963) Holzer H.,Busch D. and Kroeger H., Z.Physiol.Chem. 111, 184, (1958) Hughes D.E. and Williamson D.H., Bi0chem.J. 55,851, Hurlbert

(1953)

RQB., Siohmitz H., &umm A.F. and Potter V.R., J.Biol,Chem. =,23,(1954) Imsande J., Biochti.Biophys.Acta 82,445,(1964) Kaplan N.O., Goldin A., Humphreys S.R., Ciotti M.M., and Stolzenbach F.E., J.Biol.Chem. 219, 287, (1956) Kodiceck E. and Reddi K.K., Nature m,475,(1951) Lsmborg M., Stolzenbach F.E. and Kaplan N.O., J.Biol. Chem. =,685,(1958) Langan T.A., Kaplan N.O. and Shuster Lo, J.Biol.Chem. a,2161

,(1959)

B., Greengard P., Craston A. and Kalinsky H.J., Biochem.Biophys.Res.Comm. _?1,472,(1963) =,493,(1958) Preiss J. and Handler PC, J,Biol.Chem. Rajagopalan K.V., Sarma D.S,R., Sundarsm T.K. and Sarma P.S*, Enzymologia 2&277,(1960) Sarma D.S.R., Rajalakshmi S. and Sarma P.S., Biochem. BiophyseRes.Comm. 5,389,(1961)

Petrack

38