Vol. 4 (1973)
REPORTS
ON MATHEMATICAL
No. 3
PHYSICS
ON A CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAXIMAL ADDITIVE FIELD OF v. NEUMANN ALGEBRAS IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY
B. PAWLIK and P. SADOWSKI Department
of Mathematical
Methods
of Physics, Warsaw University,
(Received
Warsaw, Poland
May 15, 1972)
The construction presented below shows how an algebra without the additive property (called shortly a non-additive algebra) can be reduced to an additive algebra. The algebra obtained this way is the largest additive algebra contained in the original nonadditive algebra. Additivity is one of the features postulated for the observable algebra in Haag’s field theory (algebras of this type, belonging to a special class, are called by Haag kinematical ones). From another way it is well known that there are many algebras without such property (e.g. the algebra of fermions).
1. Introduction
Let us consider the algebraic formulation of the quantum field theory introduced in [2]. To any open subset 0, of the Minkowski space M a v. Neumann algebra of bounded operators a(O) acting in the Hilbert space H is assigned. An algebra &( .) is called additive if and only if for any family (O,),,. of open subsets of the Minkowski space, &‘(u 0,) is the smallest v. Neumann algebra containing all agebras &(c!?~). More exOL actly,
where (e)’ denotes the commutant of the set. We ‘assume that the algebras JZZ( .) have the following property:
If Oc&, then d(ol,)c.d((02)
for any open subsets U1, 0, of M.
2. Main theorem Let 0 be an open subset of the Minkowski space and let {U#},En be any open covering of 0. Let us introduce the following operation acting in the set of all v. Neumann algebras (U d (O,)}“. 5F& (0) : = n W&en
a
224
B. PAWLIK
and P. SADOWSKI
For any open Oc M we have THEOREM
additiveoF;d(.)=d(.).
d(.)
1.
Proofi =- This results simply from the definition G For any covering (~9~)~E,,, of 0
of F.
but
Assume
that a(
of v. Neumann Let
,) is the non-additive
algebra.
We define the following
transfinite
sequence
algebras: -c4, (0): =9-d(0)
and for any non-limit
ordinal
CC -c4,+r(0):=~~02,(O).
If 1 is limit ordinal,
then dA(0):=
Notice
that for any ordinal
The next theorem THEOREM
2.
n&=(o). a-zL
CEand p
asserts the existence
of the minimal
element _.of the sequence.
There exists such index S that for any y>6
~a(-)=~ey(*) Proof:
Assume
the sequence
is not stationary.
Notice
that for anyrset
CI and index tl
1?+&(8))=c,
where nt( .) denotes
the cardinal
number
or the power of the set and c continuum.
{AI> cd, m ({W)in
(1)
(0) cB
Because
(H),
(da (0)) < llt (B
03) ,
iit({U})=nt(B(H))=c, where B(H) denotes for CC?,
where K, denotes
the set of all bounded
operators
the power of the set of natural
acting in the Hilbert
numbers.
space H. Thus,
MAXIMAL
We can assume without
ADDITIVE
FIELD
OF V. NEUMANN
loss of generality
in (JZ?, (8) -dp
ALGEBRAS
225
that
(0)) = k ,
k-natural
number.
Note that o-first
limit ordinal 11t(d((O)-d,,(O))=K,X,=K(),
but
The last equation is contradictory to (1). Q.E.D. It is seen from Theorem 1 that d&(O) is additive. seen to be the largest one.
The algebra
obtained
this way is
The authors are very grateful to Professor K. Maurin for his grand encouragement in this work and to Doctors K. Napiorkowski and S. Woronowicz for their valuable discussions. REFERENCES [2] Haag, R., and B. Schroer, J. Math. Physics 3 (1962), 248. [l] Araki, H., Helvetica Physica Acta 36 (1963), 132.