Journal Pre-proof On-road emission measurements of reactive nitrogen compounds from heavy-duty diesel trucks in China Liqiang He, Shaojun Zhang, Jingnan Hu, Zhenhua Li, Xuan Zheng, Yihuan Cao, Guangyi Xu, Min Yan, Ye Wu PII:
S0269-7491(19)35636-2
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114280
Reference:
ENPO 114280
To appear in:
Environmental Pollution
Received Date: 29 September 2019 Revised Date:
25 February 2020
Accepted Date: 25 February 2020
Please cite this article as: He, L., Zhang, S., Hu, J., Li, Z., Zheng, X., Cao, Y., Xu, G., Yan, M., Wu, Y., On-road emission measurements of reactive nitrogen compounds from heavy-duty diesel trucks in China, Environmental Pollution (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114280. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Graphical abstract
Weather Probe
GPS
Analyzers Communication lines (including OBD data logger) Sample lines Exhaust Flow Meter
1
On-road emission measurements of reactive nitrogen compounds from
2
heavy-duty diesel trucks in China
3
Liqiang He a, Shaojun Zhang
4
Guangyi Xu e, Min Yan e, Ye Wu a, b
a, b
*, Jingnan Hu c, Zhenhua Li a, Xuan Zheng d, Yihuan Cao a,
5 6
a
7
Pollution Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
8
b
9
Complex, Beijing 100084, China
School of Environment, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution
10
c
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
11
d
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
12
518060, China
13
e
Shenzhen Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shenzhen 518001, China
14 15
* Corresponding author.
[email protected]
1 / 25
16
Abstract: Emissions of major reactive nitrogen compounds, including nitric oxide (NO),
17
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ammonia (NH3), from heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs) place
18
substantial pressure on air quality for many large cities in China. To control nitrogen oxide
19
(NOX) emissions from HDDVs, selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems have been widely
20
used since the China IV standards. To investigate the impacts of aftertreatment technologies
21
and driving conditions on real-world emissions of reactive nitrogen compounds, a portable
22
emissions measurement system was employed to test eighteen heavy-duty diesel trucks in
23
China. The results showed that the China IV and China V HDDVs with appropriate SCR
24
functionality could reduce NOX emissions by 36% and 53%, respectively, compared to the
25
China III results, although their real-world emissions were still higher than the corresponding
26
emission limits for regulatory engine tests. For these HDDVs, five samples were tested with
27
NH3 emissions, ranging from 1.67 ppm to 51.49 ppm. The NH3 emission rates tended to
28
significantly increase under high-speed driving conditions. The results indicate that the
29
current SCR technology may have certain risks in exceeding the future China VI NH3 limit.
30
However, five China IV/V HDDVs were found to have SCR temperature sensors that were
31
intentionally tampered with, resulting in comparable or even higher NOX emissions and zero
32
NH3 emissions. Increased NO2 emissions due to the adoption of diesel oxidation catalysts and
33
diesel particulate filters were also found from our experiments. This study highlights the
34
importance of enhancing in-use compliance requirements and eliminating aftertreatment
35
tampering for China IV and China V HDDVs.
36
Main finding:
37
NOX and NH3 emission profiles of heavy-duty diesel trucks indicate significant effects from
38
aftertreatments (e.g., selective catalytic reduction) and driving conditions, which should be
39
carefully considered to develop real-world emission factors.
40
Keywords: NOX, NH3, selective catalytic reduction (SCR), diesel, vehicle emissions, portable
41
emissions measurement systems (PEMS)
2 / 25
42
1. Introduction
43
On-road vehicles have been identified as one of the most important contributors to air
44
pollution in metropolitan areas across the world (Anenberg et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2019),
45
resulting in significantly adverse health impacts (Shindell et al., 2011; Wolfe et al., 2019).
46
Vehicular nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions directly trigger serious nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
47
pollution problems in traffic-dense areas, where ambient NO2 concentrations could
48
substantially exceed air quality standards (Cheng et al., 2018; UNEP, 2019). Furthermore,
49
through complex atmospheric processes, vehicle emissions were the largest local contributors
50
to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5, particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters
51
smaller than 2.5 µm) concentrations in populous cities (Wu et al., 2017). Major reactive
52
nitrogen compounds including nitric oxide (NO), NO2 and ammonia (NH3) are important
53
precursors involved in secondary particulate matters and ozone (O3) (Bishop and Stedman,
54
2015; Elser et al., 2018). In the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, one of the most polluted areas
55
in China, ambient nitrate has become the most important secondary inorganic component,
56
with an average mass fraction of 19% of the total PM2.5 mass (NAPC, 2019), which was
57
observed up to 40% during several pollution episodes (Beijing Daily, 2018). The proportion
58
of ammonium salts was responsible for 11% of the total PM2.5 mass during the heating season
59
in 2017-2018 (NAPC, 2019). In 2018, the Chinese government announced a “Three-Year
60
Action Plan for Winning the Blue Sky Defense War” (referred to as the action plan) to ensure
61
greater achievements in air pollution control (State Council, 2018). In this action plan,
62
controlling diesel truck emissions was one of the most imminent tasks (MEE, 2018a) due to
63
their high contributions of NOX and primary PM2.5 emissions among all sectors MEE (2018b).
64
To reduce air pollutant emissions, China has implemented increasingly stringent emission
65
regulations on heavy-duty diesel vehicles (HDDVs). Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)
66
systems that reduce NOX emissions through redox reactions between NOX and NH3 have been
67
applied by HDDVs since the China IV stage. Urea aqueous solution is used as a reducing
68
agent of SCR, which is injected into the exhaust stream at the SCR inlet when exhaust
69
temperatures are sufficiently high for reaction activity (typically above 200℃) (Suarez-Bertoa
70
et al., 2016; Guan et al., 2014). The adoption of urea-SCR systems might lead to NH3 leakage 3 / 25
71
because partial NH3 compounds that are not oxidized could be emitted from the tailpipe (Liu
72
et al., 2016). Thus, NH3 leakage is considered an important cause of NH3 emissions from
73
modern diesel vehicles (Suarez-Bertoa et al., 2017). Of note, previous studies reported that
74
SCR-equipped HDDVs may not be successfully reducing real-world NOX emissions as
75
expected, possibly due to low exhaust temperatures under urban driving conditions or
76
tampering of SCR systems (Zhang et al., 2014a; Yang, 2018). Therefore, a series of stringent
77
requirements have been added in the latest China VI standards. For example, enhanced
78
on-board diagnostic (OBD) functions (e.g., anti-tampering) (Yang, 2018) and exhaust thermal
79
management systems should be utilized to maintain good performance of aftertreatment
80
systems (e.g., SCR). In addition, real-world portable emission measurement system (PEMS)
81
testing and remote on-board sensing protocols have been applied to monitor the in-use
82
emission compliance. Similar to the Euro VI standards, the China VI emission standards also
83
propose a new NH3 concentration limit over the regulatory cycle in the laboratory (i.e.,
84
weighted average below 10 ppm) (EU 2011; MEE and SAMR, 2018).
85
Previous studies have not reported concurrent measurements of on-road NOX and NH3
86
emissions for HDDVs in China. As real-world driving conditions could significantly affect
87
aftertreatment performance and thus pose complex effects on NOX and NH3 emissions, it is
88
necessary to conduct real-word emission measurements for reactive nitrogen compounds. In
89
this study, a PEMS was employed to measure eighteen HDDVs that varied by emission
90
standards and aftertreatment technologies. Instantaneous gaseous emissions of NO, NO2, NH3
91
and other major species (e.g., carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbon (THC), and carbon
92
dioxide (CO2)) were tested and further analyzed in association with the vehicle operating
93
mode. Furthermore, the impacts from more stringent emission standards, driving conditions
94
and aftertreatments on NOX and NH3 emissions were explored. This study aimed to provide
95
policymakers with useful data and to highlight the urgency of enhancing in-use compliance
96
requirements and eliminating aftertreatment tampering for HDDVs to control real-world
97
emissions of reactive nitrogen compounds.
98
2. Methodology
99
2.1 Experimental section 4 / 25
100
Vehicle information. On road emission tests were conducted in Beijing and Shenzhen
101
from 2017 to 2019. The tested fleet included 11 rigid trucks and 7 semitrailer tractors
102
recruited from local freight companies. These vehicles were declared to comply with China
103
III to China V emission standards. The vehicle specifications are summarized in Table 1.
104
Table S1 lists the detailed information about the engine and aftertreatment systems (e.g.,
105
manufacturer, type and model).
106
All of these vehicles were tested as received. Before each test, we carefully checked the
107
actual status of the aftertreatment systems. Two China III vehicles (#4 and #5) were retrofitted
108
by installing diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and diesel particulate filter (DPF) systems. To
109
evaluate the impact from DOC and DPF on reactive nitrogen compounds, engine and tailpipe
110
emissions from the two vehicles were separately measured using PEMS combined with an
111
NH3 analyzer. We noticed that the urea injection systems of five vehicles (#7, #8, #11, #15
112
and #17) had been tampered with by keeping the SCR inlet temperature sensors
113
approximately 3~5 cm away from the original set position in the engine exhaust (see Figure
114
1), because the vehicle owners intended to save on the cost of diesel exhaust fluid (DEF). We
115
selected one China V vehicle (#17) among the tampered vehicles to compare real-world
116
emissions between tampered conditions vs. normal conditions (i.e., by keeping the
117
temperature sensor working appropriately).
118
Fuel and test routes. According to the PEMS measurement regulations in China (MEP,
119
2017; MEE and SAMR, 2018), we used commercial diesel fuels obtained from certified gas
120
stations, which complied with China VI standards with a sulfur content below 10 ppm. The
121
test routes consisted of urban, rural and motorway operations representing the typical driving
122
routes of heavy-duty trucks (see Figure S1). The average vehicle speeds were 15 to 30 km/h
123
for urban driving, 45 to 70 km/h for rural driving, and approximately 70 km/h for motorway
124
driving. The average test conditions are illustrated in Table 2 and the detailed trip information
125
of each test in Table S2. All drivers were professional and were instructed to maintain their
126
usual driving behaviors during the test trips.
127
Emission measurement systems. A PEMS (Model SEMTECH-ECOSTAR, Sensors Inc.,
128
USA) integrated with an NH3 analyzer (Model NMS, IAG Inc., Austria) was used to measure 5 / 25
129
real-time vehicle emissions. The SEMTECH-ECOSTAR employed a nondispersive
130
ultraviolet (NDUV) module to separately measure NO and NO2 concentrations, a
131
nondispersive infrared (NDIR) analyzer was used for measurements of CO and CO2, and a
132
heated flame ionization detector (HFID) was used for THC measurements. The NH3 analyzer
133
used a heated extractive diode laser ammonia detection technology to measure instantaneous
134
NH3 concentrations. Exhaust flow rates were monitored through a 4-inch heated sampling
135
tube assembly. Based on exhaust flow rates and concentrations of air pollutants, instantaneous
136
emission rates (g/s) were calculated. Instantaneous vehicle speed and location information
137
were collected using a global positioning system (GPS) receiver, and second-by-second
138
engine operating data, including engine torque, engine speed, fuel injection rate and vehicle
139
speed from the engine control unit (ECU), were derived by using an OBD data logger. The
140
technical details of pollutant analyzers are illustrated in Table S3.
141
2.2. Data Processing
142
An operating mode binning method was applied to mitigate the impact of various traffic
143
conditions between each individual on-road test by normalizing the emission results under a
144
benchmark operating pattern (Wu et al., 2012). As Table S4 indicates, 22 bins representing
145
instantaneous operating modes were classified by vehicle specific power (VSP) and vehicle
146
speed (Zhang et al., 2014a; Zheng et al., 2015). In this study, we calculated instantaneous VSP
147
with Eq.1 (USEPA, 2009).
148
VSP = av +
149
where VSP is estimated vehicle specific power, kW/t; a is instantaneous vehicle
150
acceleration, m/s2; v is instantaneous vehicle speed, m/s;
151
coefficient, kWs/m;
152
aerodynamic drag coefficient, kWs3/m3; and m is vehicle weight, t. In this study, the values
153
of
154
and 0.000331, respectively (Wu et al., 2012).
155
A B C v + v2 + v3 (1) m m m
B
A
is the rolling resistance
is the rotational resistance coefficient, kWs2/m2; C is the
A B C , and applied for HDDVs with GVWs greater than 12 tons were 0.0857, 0, m m m
Based on the instantaneous profiles, we estimated the average emission rates of gaseous 6 / 25
156
pollutants and derived the engine power for each operating mode bin with Eq.2 and Eq.3.
157
ERi , j =
158
1 Pi = Ti
1 Ti ∑ ERi, j,t (2) Ti t =1 Ti
∑P t =1
i ,t
(3)
159
where ER i , j is the average emission rate of pollutant j for a tested vehicle in operating
160
mode bin i, g/s; Ti is the number of seconds for a tested vehicle in operating mode bin i;
161
ERi , j ,t is the real-time emission rate of pollutant j for a tested vehicle in operating mode
162
bin i at second t, g/s; P i and Pi ,t are the average and instantaneous derived engine power
163
for a tested vehicle in operating mode bin i, kW.
164
To mitigate effects of various traffic conditions and compare to the emission limits unit in
165
g/kWh, a normalized brake-specific emission factor to a baseline traffic pattern was
166
developed for each vehicle. Eq. 4 illustrates the calculation based on average emission rates,
167
engine operating data and the time allocation of operating mode bins within a driving cycle.
168
ER i , j nBSEF j = 3600 × ∑ × npi (4) Pi i
169
where nBSEF j is the brake-specific emission factor of pollutant j , g/kWh; np i is time
170
allocation of operating mode bin i to the benchmark driving pattern (see Figure S2). In this
171
study, we refer to a modified version of the World Harmonized Vehicle Cycle (i.e., the
172
C-WTVC illustrated in Figure S3) for the chassis dynamometer test as the benchmark driving
173
pattern used for fuel consumption certification purposes of heavy-duty commercial vehicles in
174
China (AQSIQ and SA, 2011).
175
Engine operating data were not obtainable from seven vehicles (i.e., #3, #4, #5, #6, #11,
176
#12 and #13). For comparison with the emission limits (g/kWh), we applied the
177
brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) values (kg-fuel/kWh) for HDDVs provided by the
178
MOBILE6 model (US EPA, 2002) to convert the fuel-based emission factors (g/kg-fuel) into
179
brake-specific emission factors (g/kWh). Furthermore, the mean relative error of
180
brake-specific emission factors between directly calculating using engine operating data and 7 / 25
181
converting the fuel-based emission factors was 1.50% (ranging from -28.8% to 62.2%, see
182
Figure S4) and the normalized mean square error was 0.09 (N=11) in this study, suggesting
183
the usefulness of the BSFC values for HDDV fleets.
184
For these vehicles without available engine operating data, we first calculated the average
185
fuel consumption rates of each operating mode bin with Eq. 5 (Zhang et al., 2014b), and then
186
the normalized fuel-based emission factors were estimated with Eq.6 which was used to
187
convert into brake-specific emission factors (g/kWh) with Eq. 7 (Wu et al., 2012).
188
FRi =
189
ER i , j nFEF j = 1000 × ∑ × np i (6) i FR i
190
nBSEFj =
191
where FR i is the average fuel consumption rate in operating mode bin i , g/s; ER i , C O ,
192
ER i , C O and ERi,THC are average emission rates of CO2, CO and THC, respectively, in
193
operating mode bin i, g/s; WC is the ratio of carbon mass to total fuel mass, 0.866 for diesel;
194
and nFEF j is the fuel-based emission factor of pollutant j , g/kg-fuel.
195
3. Results and Discussion
196
3.1 Overview of real-world emissions of NOX and NH3
0.273 × ERi ,CO 2 + 0.429 × ERi ,CO + 0.866 × ERi ,THC (5) WC
0.454 × nFEFj × BSFC (7) 0.746 2
197
Figure 2 presents the normalized brake-specific emission factors of NOX (the sum of NO
198
and NO2) and NH3 based on a benchmark operating pattern (C-WTVC) for all tested vehicles.
199
For NOX emissions, we observed a significant difference between normal and tampered
200
vehicles for the China IV and China V samples. To better evaluate emissions of in-use
201
HDDVs in China, the tampered vehicles were classified into a separate category in the
202
following sections. Average NOX emission factors were 12.79±3.52, 8.25±1.99, 6.05±2.42
203
and 14.15±2.68 g/kWh, respectively, for China III (N=5), China IV (N=3), China V (N=5)
204
and tampered China IV/V vehicles (N=5), higher than their corresponding in-lab engine
205
emission limits (i.e., 5.0, 3.5 and 2.0 g/kWh for China III, IV and V vehicles, respectively) 8 / 25
206
due to the road-to-lab discrepancy and tampering issues (Wu et al., 2012; Yang, 2018).
207
Compared to China III vehicles, the average emission factors of the normal China IV and
208
China V vehicles decreased by 35.52% and 52.70%, respectively. For these normal China IV
209
and China V HDDVs, their average reductions in NOX emissions compared to China III are
210
comparable to the trends in Europe (i.e., Euro IV/V vs. Euro III) (Ligterink et al., 2009;
211
Ntziachristos and Samaras, 2018). However, the results of the tampered China IV/V HDDVs
212
showed an opposite trend and were increased by approximately 10.62% than the tested China
213
III HDDVs.
214
As were measured NO and NO2 emissions separately, Figure 2 indicated a decreasing trend
215
in primary NO2 emission fractions (i.e., NO2/NOX) from China III to China IV/V. The average
216
NO2 emission factors were 0.90±0.07 g/kWh for China III vehicles (N=5), 0.17±0.05 g/kWh
217
for China IV vehicles (N=3), 0.29±0.13 g/kWh for China V vehicles (N=5) and 0.32±0.09
218
g/kWh for tampered China IV/V vehicles (N=5), indicating that the average fractions of
219
primary NO2 in total NOX emissions were 7.21%±2.04%, 2.16%±0.96%, 5.33%±2.97% and
220
2.24%±0.29%, respectively. The NO2 emission factors of the tested China IV and China V
221
HDDVs including the tampered vehicles are lower than China III samples, which suggests
222
that the decreased NO2 emissions for China IV and China V HDDVs might be attributed to
223
the optimization of the combustion conditions in the diesel engines (Carslaw and Rhys-Tyler,
224
2013).
225
NH3 emissions varied significantly among all tested HDDVs. Of the five vehicles (#6, #9,
226
#10, #13 and #18) of the total eighteen tested vehicles, we detected NH3 emissions (detection
227
limit of 0.8 ppm, see Table S3) and the emission factors distributed widely from 8.16 to
228
443.67 mg/kWh. Average NH3 emission factors were 196.50±215.45 mg/kWh for China IV
229
HDDVs (N=3), far higher than that for China V vehicles (13.29±7.26 mg/kWh, N=2). As
230
shown in Table S5, the average NH3 emission concentrations of two in-use HDDVs (51.49
231
ppm for #6; 12.66 ppm for #10) failed to comply with the upcoming China VI emission limits
232
under engine tests, indicating that the current SCR technologies are facing the risk of
233
exceeding the NH3 limit. The ammonia slip catalyst (ASC) systems have been suggested for
234
adoption for China VI diesel vehicles. We did not detect NH3 emissions from China III, the 9 / 25
235
tampered China IV/V vehicles, and some normal China V vehicles (#12, #14 and #16).
236
In-depth analyses regarding the instantaneous NH3 emissions are provided in the following
237
section.
238
3.2 Impact of driving conditions on NOX and NH3 emissions
239
Figure 3 shows the instantaneous NOX, NO2 and NH3 emission rates for the tested HDDVs
240
associated with emission standards and operating modes. For low-speed zones, little
241
distinction in the NOX emission rates was found among the four vehicle categories (China III,
242
China IV, China V and tampered China IV/V vehicles). This finding implies that the SCR
243
systems might have less satisfactory performances under low-speed modes (Bins 11 to 18),
244
which tend to result in low exhaust temperatures (Wu et al., 2012). By contrast, under the
245
medium-speed modes (Bins 21 to 28) and high-speed modes (Bins 35 to 38), we observed a
246
substantial decrease in NOX emission rates for normal China IV/V HDDVs compared to the
247
China III and tampered China IV/V vehicles. For example, the average fuel-based emission
248
factors for China III vehicles were 53.22 g NOX per kg fuel under medium-speed modes and
249
38.09 g NOX per kg fuel under high-speed modes, separately. The decreases in the average
250
ratios of NOX emissions to fuel consumption were 31.76% (medium-speed modes) and
251
42.49% (high-speed modes) for China IV, and 57.78% (medium-speed modes) and 60.38%
252
(high-speed modes) for China V. However, the NOX emissions of the tampered China IV/V
253
vehicles were comparable to or even higher than the China III vehicles in this study (see
254
Figure S5).
255
Unlike the NOX emissions, the China IV and China V vehicles emitted lower NO2 than
256
China III vehicles even under low-speed driving conditions, regardless of whether the SCR
257
systems had been tampered. These results confirmed that the low NO2 emissions are more
258
related to the optimization of the combustion conditions in the engines rather than the SCR
259
systems because less urea was injected under low-speed modes (Carslaw and Rhys-Tyler,
260
2013). In Figure S5, the NO2 emission to fuel consumption shows significant inverse trends
261
with VSP and vehicle speed due to the higher tendency of NO2 formation in the tailpipe at
262
lower temperatures which are associated with lower driving speeds and engine loads (Coda
263
Zabetta and Kilpinen, 2001). For example, the average emissions for China III vehicles were 10 / 25
264
4.90±1.53, 3.51±0.96 and 2.50±1.00 g NO2 per kg fuel under low-speed, medium-speed and
265
high-speed mode, respectively.
266
Several factors are known to affect NH3 emissions of HDDVs, such as the application of
267
SCR systems (Suarez-Bertoa et al., 2016) and ASC systems (Mendoza-Villafuerte et al.,
268
2017), the quality of DEF and the calibration strategy of urea injections (i.e., injection
269
quantity of DEF under different conditions) (Jeon et al., 2016). In this study, NH3 was emitted
270
mainly under medium-speed and high-speed modes for five SCR-equipped HDDVs (see
271
Figure 3). Figure 4 and Figure S6 presents the real-world NOX and NH3 emission profiles for
272
four typical China IV and China V HDDVs. These results revealed a profound discrepancy in
273
NH3 emissions between in-use HDDVs in China. Peak NH3 concentrations could be more
274
than 65 ppm for the five vehicles (#6, #9, #10, #13 and #18), especially over 300 ppm for the
275
#6 and #10 vehicles, suggesting that the introduction of SCR systems to diesel fleets might
276
risk higher NH3 emissions. To increase the SCR efficiency, higher NH3 emissions usually
277
occurs under certain real-driving conditions (e.g., #6 and #9, see Figure 4(a) and Figure
278
S6(a)). However, #16 vehicle is an example that a good SCR performance not only reduced
279
NOX emissions but also prevented NH3 slip (see Figure 4 (b)). In addition, there are a number
280
of high NOX emitters among the China IV and China V vehicles in China because their SCR
281
systems were tampered with to use less or no DEF (EEO, 2017), although NH3 emissions
282
from these vehicles were not detected (e.g., #15 vehicle, see Figure S6(b)). Thus,
283
anti-tampering management of in-use China IV and China V HDDVs need to be further
284
strengthened to control NOX emissions.
285
3.3 Impact of aftertreatments on NOX and NH3 emissions
286
Figure 5 compares the NOX emission factors under various driving conditions for the two
287
China III HDDVs (#4 and #5) with and without DOC and DPF. Likewise, no NH3 emissions
288
were detected for the #4 and #5 vehicles equipped with DOC and DPF in this study. The
289
average primary NO2 emissions increased substantially, with the average primary NO2 ratios
290
increasing from 9.63% to 20.00%. The increases were more significant under medium- and
291
high-speed conditions. The average primary NO2 ratios for #4 and #5 without DOC and DPF
292
were 8.04%±0.44% under medium-speed conditions and 10.28%±0.52% under high-speed 11 / 25
293
conditions. However, the ratios are as high as 22.56%±9.64% and 29.84%±14.04% with DOC
294
and DPF, respectively, confirming that the use of oxidation catalysts significantly increase
295
primary NO2 emissions (Velders et al., 2011; Vojtíšek-Lom et al., 2018). The overall primary
296
NO2 fraction for HDDVs in China is expected to be lower than that in Europe (Kousoulidou
297
et al., 2008; Velders et al., 2011). This is because not all major cities in China have retrofitted
298
some of the China III HDDVs with DOC and DPF. The wide-scale adoption of DPF will not
299
be deployed until the full implementation of China VI standards (2020 for Heavy-duty diesel
300
vehicles).
301
For the #17 vehicle, comparative experiments between tampered and normal SCR
302
temperature sensors revealed that the temperature data has a significant impact on the
303
performance of SCR systems and thus the emissions of reactive nitrogen compounds. What is
304
striking in Figure 6 is the discrepancy of NH3 emissions under high-speed driving conditions.
305
As previously stated, no NH3 emissions were detected when the SCR inlet temperature sensor
306
was set away from the original position. However, once the temperature sensor was reset
307
normally, the peak NH3 concentration was as high as 85 ppm (see Figure 6(b)). Table S6
308
reports that compared to the tampered condition, the estimated NOX emission factors of the
309
normal condition were reduced by approximately 25.09% under medium-speed driving
310
conditions and 62.21% under high-speed driving conditions. The average NH3 emissions of
311
10.01 mg/kWh for high-speed driving conditions also confirmed the injection of urea in the
312
SCR system. These results suggest that tampering with the SCR systems could affect both
313
NOX and NH3 emissions.
314
4 Conclusions
315
Real-world gaseous emissions of reactive nitrogen compounds were measured for eighteen
316
HDDVs using PEMS and an NH3 analyzer. We applied an operating mode binning method to
317
estimate on-road emission factors under a benchmark operating cycle (i.e., C-WTVC), with a
318
special focus on NO, NO2 and NH3 emissions. The average emission factors were 12.79±3.52,
319
8.25±1.99, 6.05±2.42 and 14.15±2.68 g/kWh, respectively, for China III (N=5), China IV
320
(N=3), China V (N=5) and tampered China IV/V HDDVs (N=5), higher than the emission
321
limits of regulatory engine tests, especially for the tampered China IV/V vehicles. 12 / 25
322
The fractions of primary NO2 of the total NOX emissions were lower than 10% for all
323
HDDVs without oxidation catalysts such as DOC and DPF. In addition, the optimization of
324
the combustion conditions in the diesel engines could be a major driver to reduce primary
325
NO2 emissions for the China IV and China V HDDVs. For example, tampered China IV/V
326
trucks reduced NO2 emissions by 61.7% compared to China III trucks. For NH3 emissions,
327
only five HDDVs were detected, among which the average NH3 concentrations of two
328
HDDVs were higher than the upcoming China VI limit (10 ppm).
329
Furthermore, we explored the impacts of driving conditions and aftertreatment systems on
330
real-world NOX and NH3 emissions. The emission results associated with operating modes
331
revealed that NOX emission factors were higher under low-speed modes. Compared to China
332
III vehicles, the NOX emissions under medium-speed and high-speed modes decreased by
333
19.5% and 51.7% for China IV vehicles, and 60.0% and 72.1% for China V vehicles,
334
respectively. Unlike medium-speed and high-speed modes, there was little distinction in the
335
NOX emissions under lower-speed modes. The adoption of DOC and DPF could increase the
336
average fraction of primary NO2 in NOX emissions from 9.6% to 20%, and the comparative
337
experiments between tampered and normal SCR conditions revealed that SCR tampering
338
could significantly affect NOX and NH3 emissions. For example, when the SCR temperature
339
sensor was set appropriately, high NH3 concentrations were identified under high-speed
340
modes and NOX emissions decreased.
341
For HDDV fleets, this study suggests an urgent need for China’s policy-makers to enhance
342
in-use compliance testing programs and relevant regulations (e.g., PEMS, remote OBD and
343
remote sensing standards) to guarantee a real-world NOX emission reduction benefit in China.
344
Acknowledgements
345
This study was sponsored by the National Key Research and Development Program of China
346
(2017YFC0211100 and 2017YFC0212100); and the National Natural Science Foundation of
347
China (NSFC) (No. 91544222). The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the
348
authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the sponsors.
349
13 / 25
350
References
351
1.
Anenberg, S. C., Miller, J., Minjares, R., Du, L., Henze, D. K., Lacey, F., Malley, C. S.,
352
Emberson, L., Franco, V., Klimont Z., Heyes, C., 2017. Impacts and mitigation of excess
353
diesel-related NOX emissions in 11 major vehicle markets. Nature 545, 467–471.
354
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22086
355
2.
AQSIQ (General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of
356
the People's Republic of China) and SA (Standardization administration of the People's
357
Republic of China), 2011. Fuel consumption test methods for heavy-duty commercial
358
vehicles (GB/T 27840-2011) (in Chinese).
359
3.
Beijing Daily. Beijing's multi-sectors are fully committed to tackling heavy pollution,
360
and regional joint emergency measures can reduce emissions by 10% to 15%. Available
361
at. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1617090713475637529&wfr=spider&for=pc,
362
Accessed date: 23 September 2019 (in Chinese).
363
4.
Bishop, G. A., Stedman, D. H., 2015. Reactive nitrogen species emission trends in three
364
light-/medium-duty United States fleets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(18): 11234-11240.
365
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02392
366
5.
Carslaw, D. C., Rhys-Tyler, G., 2013. New insights from comprehensive on-road
367
measurements of NOX, NO2 and NH3 from vehicle emission remote sensing in London,
368
UK. Atmos. Environ. 81: 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.026
369
6.
Cheng, N., Li, Y., Sun, F., et al., Chen, C., Wang, B., Li, Q., Wei, P., Cheng, B., 2018.
370
Ground-level NO2 in urban Beijing: Trends, distribution, and effects of emission
371
reduction measures. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18: 343-356. http://doi:
372
10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0092
373
7.
Coda Zabetta, E., Kilpinen, P., 2001. Improved NOX submodel for in-cylinder CFD
374
simulation of low-and medium-speed compression ignition engines. Energy Fuels 15(6):
375
1425-1433. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010062q
376
8.
EEO (The Economic Observer), 2017. Tampering devices are sold on Taobao. Emissions
377
cheating of commercial vehicles is increasing. Available at
378
http://www.eeo.com.cn/2017/0216/298238.shtml, Accessed date: 10 September 2019 (in
379
Chinese).
380
9.
Elser, M., El-Haddad, I., Maasikmets, M., Bozzetti, C., Wolf, R., Ciarelli, G., Slowik, J.
381
G., Richter, R., Teinemaa, E., Hüglin, C., Baltensperger, U., 2018. High contributions of
382
vehicular emissions to ammonia in three European cities derived from mobile
383
measurements. Atmos. Environ. 175: 210-220.
384
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.030
385
10. EU, 2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 of 25 May 2011 implementing and 14 / 25
386
amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
387
with respect to emissions from heavy duty vehicles (Euro VI) and amending Annexes I
388
and III to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J.
389
Eur. Union (L 167/1)
390
11. Guan, B., Zhan, R., Lin, H., Huang, Z., 2014. Review of state of the art technologies of
391
selective catalytic reduction of NOX from diesel engine exhaust. Appl. Therm. Eng.
392
66(1-2): 395-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.021
393
12. Jeon, J., Lee, J. T., Park, S., 2016. Nitrogen compounds (NO, NO2, N2O, and NH3) in
394
NOX emissions from commercial Euro VI type heavy-duty diesel engines with a
395
urea-selective catalytic reduction system. Energy Fuels 30(8): 6828-6834.
396
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01331
397
13. Kousoulidou, M., Ntziachristos, L., Mellios, G., Samaras, Z., 2008. Road-transport
398
emission projections to 2020 in European urban environments. Atmos. Environ. 42(32),
399
7465-7475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.002
400 401
14. Ligterink, N. E., Lange, R. D., Vermeulen, R., Dekker, H., 2009. On-road NOX emissions of Euro-V trucks. TNO report, MON-RPT-033-DTS-2009-03840.
402
15. Liu, B., Yan, F., Hu, J., Turkson, R. F., Lin, F., 2016. Modeling and Multi-Objective
403
Optimization of NOX Conversion Efficiency and NH3 Slip for a Diesel Engine.
404
Sustainability 8(5): 478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050478
405
16. MEE (Ministry of Environmental and Environment of the People's Republic of China),
406
2018a. Action plans for diesel truck pollution control. Available at
407
http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/201901/W020190104656772362578.pdf,
408
Accessed date: 23 September 2019 (in Chinese).
409
17. MEE (Ministry of Environmental and Environment of the People's Republic of China),
410
2018b. China vehicle environmental management annual report. Available at
411
http://dqhj.mee.gov.cn/jdchjgl/zhgldt/201806/P020180604354753261746.pdf, Accessed
412
date: 23 September 2019 (in Chinese).
413
18. MEE (Ministry of Environmental and Environment of the People's Republic of China),
414
SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation of the People's Republic of China),
415
2018. Limits and measurement methods for emissions from diesel fuelled heavy-duty
416
vehicles (China VI) (GB 17691-2018) (in Chinese).
417
19. Mendoza-Villafuerte, P., Suarez-Bertoa, R., Giechaskiel, B., et al., 2017. NOX, NH3, N2O
418
and PN real driving emissions from a Euro VI heavy-duty vehicle. Impact of regulatory
419
on-road test conditions on emissions. Sci. Total Environ. 609: 546-555.
420
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.168
421
20. MEP (Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China), 2017. 15 / 25
422
Measurement method and technical specification for PEMS test of exhaust pollutants
423
from heavy-duty diesel and gas fueled vehicles (HJ 857-2017) (in Chinese).
424
21. NAPC (National joint research center for tackling key problems in air pollution control),
425
2019. Nitrate has become the main secondary inorganic component of fine particulate
426
matter (PM2.5) in Beijing, tianjin and hebei. Available at
427
http://www.chndaqi.com/news/288720.html, Accessed date: 23 September 2019.
428
22. Ntziachristos, L., Samaras, Z., 2018. Methodology for the calculation of exhaust
429
emissions. SNAPs 070100-070500, NFRs 1A3bi-iv.-EMEP/EEA Emission inventory
430
guidebook. Available at https://www.emisia.com/utilities/copert/documentation/,
431
Accessed date: 23 September 2019.
432
23. Shindell, D., Faluvegi, G., Walsh, M., Anenberg, S. C., Van Dingenen, R., Muller, N. Z.,
433
Austin, J., Koch, D., Milly, G., 2011. Climate, health, agricultural and economic impacts
434
of tighter vehicle-emission standards. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1(1): 59.
435
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1066
436
24. State Council, 2018. Notice of the State Council on the action plan for the three years of
437
Blue Sky Protection Campaign. Available at
438
http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/03/content_5303158.htm (in Chinese).
439
25. Suarez-Bertoa, R., Mendoza-Villafuerte, P., Bonnel, P., Lilova, V., Hill, L., Perujo, A.,
440
Astorga, C., 2016. On-road measurement of NH3 and N2O emissions from a Euro V
441
heavy-duty vehicle. Atmos. Environ. 139: 167-175.
442
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.035
443
26. Suarez-Bertoa, R., Mendoza-Villafuerte, P., Riccobono, F., Vojtisek, M., Pechout, M.,
444
Perujo, A., Astorga, C., 2017. On-road measurement of NH3 emissions from gasoline and
445
diesel passenger cars during real world driving conditions. Atmos. Environ. 166: 488-497.
446
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.056
447
27. UNEP (United nations environment programme), 2019. A review of 20 Years’ Air
448
Pollution Control in Beijing. Available at
449
https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27645/airPolCh_EN.pdf?sequen
450
ce=1&isAllowed=y. , Accessed date: 10 September 2019.
451
28. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 2002. Analysis of BSFCs and
452
calculation of heavy-duty engine emission conversion factors (EPA-420-R-02-005).
453
29. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2009. Development of Emission Rates
454
for Heavy-Duty Vehicles in the Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator
455
(EPA-420-P-09-005).
456 457
30. Velders, G. J., Geilenkirchen, G. P., de Lange, R., 2011. Higher than expected NOX emission from trucks may affect attainability of NO2 limit values in the Netherlands. 16 / 25
458 459
Atmos. Environ. 45(18), 3025-3033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.023 31. Vojtíšek-Lom, M., Beranek, V., Klír, V., Jindra, P., Pechout, M., Voříšek, T., 2018.
460
On-road and laboratory emissions of NO, NO2, NH3, N2O and CH4 from late-model EU
461
light utility vehicles: Comparison of diesel and CNG. Sci. Total Environ. 616, 774-784.
462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.248
463
32. Wolfe P, Davidson K, Fulcher C, Fann, N., Zawacki, M., Baker, K. R., 2019. Monetized
464
health benefits attributable to mobile source emission reductions across the United States
465
in 2025. Sci. Total Environ. 650: 2490-2498.
466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.273
467
33. Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Hao, J., Liu, H., Wu, X., Hu, J., Walsh, M. P., Wallington, T. J., Zhang,
468
K. M., Stevanovic, S., 2017. On-road vehicle emissions and their control in China: A
469
review and outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 574, 332-349.
470
34. Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Li, M., Ge, Y., Shu, J., Zhou, Y., Xu, Y., Hu, J., Liu H., Fu, L., He, K.,
471
Hao, J., 2012. The challenge to NOX emission control for heavy-duty diesel vehicles in
472
China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12: 9365-9379. http://doi:10.5194/acp-12-9365-2012
473
35. Yang D, Zhang S, Niu T, Wang, Y., Xu, H., Zhang, K. M., Wu, Y., 2019. High-resolution
474
mapping of vehicle emissions of atmospheric pollutants based on large-scale, real-world
475
traffic datasets. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19(13), 8831-8843.
476
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8831-2019
477
36. Yang, L., 2018. Real-world emissions in china: a meta-study of PEMS emissions data
478
from china 0 to china 5/v light-and heavy-duty vehicles. (White paper). The International
479
Council on Clean Transportation.
480
37. Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Hu, J., Huang, R., Zhou, Y., Bao, X., Fu, L., Hao, J., 2014a. Can Euro
481
V heavy-duty diesel engines, diesel hybrid and alternative fuel technologies mitigate
482
NOX emissions? New evidence from on-road tests of buses in China. Appl. Energy 132:
483
118-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.008
484
38. Zhang, S., Wu, Y., Liu, H., Huang, R., Yang, L., Li, Z., Fu, L., Hao, J., 2014b.
485
Real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of urban public buses in Beijing. Appl.
486
Energy 113: 1645-1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.017
487
39. Zheng, X., Wu, Y., Jiang, J., Zhang, S., Liu, H., Song, S., Li., Z, Fan, X., Fu, L., Hao, J.,
488
2015. Characteristics of on-road diesel vehicles: black carbon emissions in Chinese cities
489
based on portable emissions measurement. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(22): 13492-13500.
490
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04129
17 / 25
491
Figures
492 493
Figure 1. The most common example of defeat SCR systems for in-use HDDVs in China. (a)
494
Tampered SCR systems by keeping the SCR inlet temperature sensors approximately 3~5 cm
495
away from the original set position in engine exhaust, (b) Defeat device with a cost of about
496
$2, and (c) Normal condition of the exhaust temperature sensors (i.e., the manufacturer
497
default setting).
18 / 25
498
499 500
Figure 2. The normalized NOX and NH3 emission factors for the eighteen tested HDDVs. The
501
emission factors of the #4 and #5 vehicles represent the results measured without the
502
aftertreatment devices.
19 / 25
503 504
Figure 3. Average NOX, NO2 and NH3 emission rates according to operating mode
20 / 25
505
506 507
Figure 4. Examples of instantaneous NOX and NH3 emission profiles and vehicle speed: (a)
508
Lower NOX and higher NH3 emissions under high speed, (b) Lower NOX and NH3 emissions
509
under medium and high speed.
21 / 25
510 511
Figure 5. NOX emission factors under various driving conditions for the two China III
512
HDDVs (#4 and #5) with and without DOC and DPF.
22 / 25
513 514
Figure 6. Instantaneous NOX and NH3 emission profiles and vehicle speed for #17 HDDVs,
515
(a) tampering with the SCR systems by keeping the SCR inlet temperature sensor away from
516
the original set position in the engine exhaust and (b) resetting the SCR inlet temperature
517
sensor (i.e., the manufacturer default setting).
23 / 25
518
Tables
519
Table 1. Summary of vehicle specifications
Vehicle
Vehicle
Production
Odometer
GVW a
Load b
Emission Aftertreatments
No.
type
year
(103 km)
(kg)
#1
Truck
2009
294.4
25000
6.8%
Without
China III
#2
Truck
2009
295.7
25000
6.8%
Without
China III
#3c
Truck
2009
296.8
12490
16.4%
Without
China III
#4c, d
Tractor
2013
530.0
17995
13.4%
DOC+DPF
China III
#5c, d
Tractor
2013
640.7
17995
13.4%
DOC+DPF
China III
#6c
Truck
2015
94.7
15685
12.2%
SCR
China IV
#7e
Tractor
2015
282.2
13950
18.4%
SCR
China IV
#8e
Tractor
2015
290.7
16900
13.7%
SCR
China IV
#9
Truck
2014
339.2
20400
9.9%
SCR
China IV
#10
Truck
2014
542.8
20400
9.9%
SCR
China IV
#11c, e
Truck
2014
684.3
20400
9.9%
SCR
China IV
#12c
Tractor
2018
8.0
25000
9.3%
SCR
China V
#13c
Truck
2018
11.3
31000
5.5%
SCR
China V
#14
Truck
2018
84.4
20490
10.0%
SCR
China V
#15e
Tractor
2017
102.0
25000
9.3%
SCR
China V
#16
Truck
2018
113.3
20490
10.0%
SCR
China V
#17e
Tractor
2017
136.8
25000
9.3%
SCR
China V
#18
Truck
2016
256.6
20490
10.0%
SCR
China V
standard
520
Note: a Gross vehicle weight; b The percentage of actual load mass to the maximum load capability;
521
c
522
tests; d Retrofitted vehicles by installing DOC and DPF; e Tampered SCR systems by keeping the
523
SCR inlet temperature sensors 3~5 cm away from the original set position in the engine exhaust
524
(see Figure 1).
Engine operating data of these vehicles were not collected via an OBD data logger during the
24 / 25
525
Table 2. Summary of average test conditions per vehicle. City Vehicle Speed (km/h) Distance (km) Maximum relative positive acceleration (m/s2) Ambient temperature (℃) Relative humidity (%) Altitude (m)
526
Beijing #1, #2, #3, #6, #9, #10, #11, #13, #14, #16, #18 46 (38-54) a 104 (88-108)
Note: a Mean (Minimum-Maximum).
25 / 25
Shenzhen #4, #5, #7, #8, #12, #15, #17 47 (42-52) 90 (83-98)
2.6 (1.8-3.5)
2.1 (1.4-3.1)
22 (15-33) 29 (13-70) 53 (50-54)
23 (19-29) 45 (25-64) 30 (27-32)
Highlights Tampered trucks emitted twice as much NOX as normal trucks although no NH3 detected. Current selective catalytic reduction may emit NH3 above the China VI limit. Oxidation catalysts increased NO2 by 79%, but little effect on NOX and NH3.