BIOCHEMICAL
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1972
ON THE
SIZE
OF THE
ACTIVE
Elvin From
the Department
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
SITE
Harper*+
IN PROTEASES:
and Arieh
Berger
Weizmann Israel
of Biophysics, Rehovoth,
PRONASE
Institute
of Science,
Received February 11, 1972 Summary The size of the active site of the enzyme Pronase has been determined by the method of diastereoisomeric replacement and shown to be five amino acid residues in length. The application of this method for measuring the size of the active site to broad spectrum enzymes is demonstrated. In continuation active
site
a broad
of Pronase
substrate
proteins.
The
method
which
modifications of their
further
alteration
’ Supported
acid
if this
enzyme
would
the size
of the
is an enzyme
enzymic
with
hydrolysis
adhere
examined
compares
of
to the rules
(3) then one could to investigate
the activity
of
utilize
the active
of the enzyme
and diastereoisomeric
residue
has alter
from
no longer
by N.I.H.
total
replacement
length
distance
Address: Hospital,
Pronase for
previously
employed
in structure
function
* Present General
that
(i),
in general.
of increasing an amino
series
investigated.
of diastereoisomeric of proteases
in this
employed
enzymes
size
peptides
(2) was
thought
specific
the method
studies
specificity
It was
the more
site
of previous
been
replaced
of reaction
the point
of cleavage
the rate
Developmental Biology Boston, Massachusetts Fellowship
1956 Copyright 0 1972, by Academic Press, Inc.
by its
the rate
affects
Postdoctoral
pairs
antipode.
in
These
enzyme
as a
by the enzyme.
When
of reaction,
fF
of peptides
of the
Laboratory, 02114.
towards
the length
Massachusetts
2AM-34-222-01
of the
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
This
active
site
has
been
measured.
point
to be
the
same
at
of
this
point
all
of cleavage
times
to affect
peptides
Berger
(4).
purified
by
were
Pronase
the
the
method
of
examinedbyquantitative
as
described
O.O3M,
Pronase
and
0.05M
A
k value
are
given
in
The
k values
assuming site.
acid ing
order
to the
distance
was
only
doubled
rate
from
the
an
increase diminishing
reaction
contained pH
substrate
7.8
in
one
ml.
of bonds vary
substrate cleaved
enzyme
in
the
catalytic
in
subsites
and
the
catalytic order
were
and
can
the
a D
be
at
substrate
by
the
enzyme
is always
The their
residue.
interpreted are
site. exert
of alanine
with
aminoacids
is
first
peptides
remaining
at amino
influence
accord-
site.
with
regard
obtained
when
to the
enzyme
and
substrate
sub-
concen-
tripled. increases
200
dipeptide
demonstrating is
cleavage
that
constants or
The
electrophoresis
CaCl2
bond
was
constant
L residues
tripeptide
rate
no
from
further
Discussion
of the
are
studied
(5).
reaction
constants)
adjacent they
reaction
The
the
occupy
identical
tration
array
peptide of
rate
and
and
on 20 diastereoisomeric is
side
of Schechter
BioChem
Narahashi
0.005M
and
There
a linear
residues
strate,
trating
(first
region
The
There
1.
The
same
Pronase
Table
that
active the
for
method
Gal
typical
Tris
Results The
the
highvoltagepaper
(3).
2Oy,
oneither
Methods
from
Nomato
hydrolysis
rates.
by
obtained
productswere previously
and
the
changes
reaction
synthesized
was
assumes
andintroduces
Materials Alanine
method
the of
to
effect
of
in
the
tripeptide
effect
2. 5 fold
fold
and
of increasing from
tripeptide
additional
1957
subsites
case
of peptides
500
fold
from
the
peptide
to tetrapeptide on
enzyme
containing dipeptide length. illuscatalytic
to
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL
Table Pronase
Cleavage
Peptide
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
1
of
Relative
Alanine
Peptides
Rate
k t min’
L-
LLL
100
0.36
80
0.30
L-LLLD
70
0.25
L-
LLD
60
0.20
L-
LLDL
50
0.20
L-LL
40
0.15
DL-LL
20
0.08
15
0.05
DLLL-L
5
0.02
L-LDLL
5
0.02
L-
5
0.02
L-LD
5
0.02
LDLL-L
2
0.008
DLL-L
2
0.007
LDL-L
0. 7
0.003
DL-LLD
0.5
0.002
DL-L
0.3
0.001
L-L
0.2
0.0007
DLLD
0
LDL
0
DL-
LLL
DL-
LLLD
LDL
rate zyme. equals
as
the This bond
substrate effect cleaved)
approaches of increased
the
size
peptide
:
1958
of length
the
active is
as
site follows
of
the
(dash
9
en-
Vol. 46, No. 5, 1972
BIOCHEMICAL
AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
k 100 40 0. 2
L-LLL L-LL L-L Maintaining
the
peptide
D demonstrates the
the
D residue
length role
This
to the
is
and
changing
of diastereoisomeric
adjacent
breakage.
constant
seen
in
L residue
replacement.
susceptible the
the
bond
tripeptide
lowers
series
to
Placing the
rate
of
bond
:
k L-LL L-LD DL-L LDL the
tetrapeptide
series
40 5 0. 3 0
: k 100 60 20 5 2 0.7 0
L-LLL L-LLD DL-LL L-LDL DLL-L LDL-L DLLD the
pentapeptide
series: k 80 70 50 5 2 0.5
DL-LLL L-LLLD L-LLDL L-LDLL LDLL-L DL-LLD The
enzyme
assumed
size
an L residue binding
of the
the
on
of
its
usually
Inspection sites
favors
the
substrate.
substrates
that
active
site.
causes
a dimunitionin
contain
Introduction
all
L peptides
within
of a D residue rate
probably
there
are
in
due
to
the
place
of
decreased
substrate. of these enzyme, Assuming
data each
suggests
that
of whichwill the
size
combine of each
1959
residue
with
five
stereospecific
one
to be
3.5
amino A,.
acid This
of is
Vol. 46, No:~,
in
the
BIOCHEMICAL
1972
range
of
the
size
carboxypeptidase
A
AND BIOPHYSICAL
determined
by
this
RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
method
for
papain
(1)
multiple
and
(6). Conclusion
Pronase, site
a broad
attachment.
divided
The
into
These
subsites
data
grooves
spectrum
are
in
in
which
length with
of
the
with
substrate
binds
to
peptides
by
site
is
5 amino
acid
active
differences
keeping the
enzyme
in
that
their
of work
sets
binding on
residues
characteristics.
enzymes
possessing
(7).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The peptides
authors
thank
employed
Dr.
in
Israel
these
Schechter
for
the
gift
of
the
alanine
studies.
REFERENCES
i.
Schechter, -27,
157
I.,
and
Berger,
A.,
Biochem.
Biophys.
and
Y.,
J.
Biochem.
Nomato,
3.
Schechter,
I.,
and
Berger,
A.,
Biochemistry?,
4.
Schechter,
I.,
and
Berger,
A.,
Biochemistry
5.
Nomato,
6.
Abramowitz,
7.
Blake, Sarma,
M.,
Narahashi,
2.
Res.
Res.
GommUn.
(1967).
and
M.,
N..
Commun. G. G. F., V. R.,
Narahashi, Schechter, -29,
Mair, Proc.
862
Y., I.,
J.
andBerger,
-46,
5,
Biochem. A.,
653
(1959).
3371
(1966).
3362
(1966).
-46, Biochem.
148 i
(1959).
Biophys.
(1967).
G.A., North A. C. J., Phillips, Roy. Sot. (London) 13167, 365
1960
D. G. (1967).
and