LETTERS
are observed.
In regions of the crystal which are free
from plastic deformation, and collapse
the excess vacancies
to form dislocation
class of materials homogeneous vacancy
TO
loops.
cluster
The second
is similar to the first except
nucleation
of
dislocation
that
loops
from
clusters does not occur rapidly at room tem-
perature after quenching.
Hence dislocation
loops are
only observed in regions where dislocations have moved during quenching.
This may account for the structure
of quenched Cu and Ni where micrographs loops associated with dislocation
nucleation.
However
dislocations
seems to be difficult,
cancies
loop
in the latter case, cross-slip of perhaps because of
solute pinning, and hence the distribution
typefied
of loops is
on definite slip planes than in Cu
by concentrated by dislocations
1121
5. K. H. WESTMACOTT, R. S. BARNES, D. HULL and R. E. SMALLMAN, Phil. Mug. 6, 929 (1961). 6. J. TAKAMURA and J. GREENFIELD, J. Appl. Phys. 33, 241 (1962). 7. R.E.SMALLMAN,K.H.WESTMACOTT~~~J.A.COILEY, J. Inst. Met. 88, 127 (1959-60). 8. S. MADER, A. SEECER and E. SIMSCH, Z. Metallk. 52, 7% (1961). 9. J. TAKAMURA, Acta Met. 9, 54’7 (1961). 10. A. H. COTTRELL, Creep an/l Bructure of Metals at High Tempwatures p. 141, H.M.S.O. (1954). * KerttiredApril 28. 1962.
only show
t’he structure of some quenched dilute Al alloys where
and Ni (e.g. Fig. 3(b)).
EDITOR
tangles, and also for
the solute atoms appear to hinder homogeneous
more concentrated
THE
On the yield point of body-centered-cubic metals * It is well known that b.c.c. metals will, in general, exhibit
the phenomenon
consequent
upper
of abrupt
yielding,
and lower yield
point,
with a
and that
In the final class of alloys,
there is a temperature below which yield strength rises
Al alloys, absorption
sharply
of va-
occurs but the redistribution
process appears bo be prevented.
Hence the frictional
as temperature
is decreased.
planations
for these phenomena
literature,
e.g. Refs.,+@
ex-
but it can hardly be stated
force caused by the absorbed vacancies soon stops the
that
dislocation
theories can be divided into two main classifications,
moving
and more
dislocations
generated to relieve the applied stress. vacancies
distribute
themselves
must
be
The absorbed
evenly along the dis-
location to form a helix and hence the microstructure consists of a high density ( 10s-lO1o lines/cm2) of helical dislocations
unanimity
Numerous
have appeared in the
of thought
exists.
Basically,
depending on whether static or dynamic effects control yielding.
The purpose of this letter is to present evi-
dence in support of the dynamic
viewpoint.
If the same mechanism is responsible for yielding in all b.c.c. metals, it should be possible,
and very few prismatic loops.
In this summary we have only considered the micro-
the
by the use of
suitable parameters such as elastic modulus and melt-
Slower quenching rates or ageing after quenching must clearly
ing temperature,
alter t)he structure
plotted the ratio of yield strength to elastic modulus
structure
of
nucleation materials
quenched
e.g. it may
of dislocation discussed
deformation hitherto
rapidly
periments
We believe
quenching
unrecognised
structure of quenched
cause homogeneous
loops in the second class of
above.
during
materials.
parameter
that plastic
is an important, affecting
metals and alloys.
the microFurther ex-
are being carried out to test the validity
the general ideas expressed
above
of
and to ascertain
the precise nature of the vacancy absorption tribution
and
and redis-
to plot the observed yield strengths
curve.
to Professor A. H. Cottrell, F.R.S.,
Wessel, and France@)
for W, Cr, MO, Ta, Nb, and V,
but found a separate curve for each metal.
However,
all the group V-a metals had similar slopes, as did the VI-a metals.
Although
the grain size was not consid-
ered in their curves, the yield strength of b.c.c. metals is related to d?,
where d is the grain diameter, through
the well known Petch equation.(2>10) Utilizing plots of yield strength vs. d-$, along with some yield strength data, the present author selected a
grain size that was within the range of the available results, i.e. ~1300
for helpful discussions.
Bechtold,
as a function of TIT,
vs. temperature
process on dislocations.
We are grateful
on a common
grains/mm2
to find parameters
(d-h = 6 mm-i),
J. D. EMBURY
attempted
Department of Metallurgy
C. M. SARGENT
strengths for this grain size could be plotted
University of Cambridge
R. B. NICHOLSON
curve.
References 1. D. KUHLMANN-WILSDORF, Phil. Nag. 3, 126 (1958). 2. For review see A. KELLY end R. B. NICHOLSON, Progress in Mate&&- Science Vol. 10, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1962). 3. H. G. F. WILSDORF and D. KUHLMANN-WILSDORF, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 516 (1960). 4. G.THoMAs~~~M.J.WHELAN, Phil. Mag.4,511( 1959).
on one
Strain rate is another variable that is known to
affect yield strength;
England
and
such that all the yield
at comparable magnitude.
however, all data were obtained
strain rates. i.e. within
an order of
It has been suggested that dislocation velocity is an important factor in the yield phenomenon.(6-8~11~12) There are no data for dislocation metals considered
here;
however,
velocities
in the
it can be assumed
1122
ACTA
METALLURGICA,
VOL.
10,
1962
that some of the factors that control dislocation veloc-
yield strength
ity are the same as the factors that control the pro-
creased.
pagation
or yield strength when a yield point was not, observed.
of elastic
which represents
waves.
For this reason
a longitudinal
(E/p)*,
wave velocity.
was
rapidly
selected as a parameter
that might correlate all the
data.
modulus and p is the density
so that,
$!P,
E
ii,P, gs =const. -T
Figure 1 shows the ratio of yield stress to (~~~)~ REF
&SEC-'
I3 7 I5 16 17 18 $9 20 21 22,23
2B.10‘~ 6 95x10-3 33x10-4 2 6.10“ 7 2erto-4 3.3x10-3 2.6xio-* 15x10-3 ,x!O-~
.
In obtaining data from a large number of sources, it is
14 088rlo-4
ONb Nb
0 Fe
only natural to find some disagreement, and one does not. A
completely
satisfactory
interpretation
the dislocations
released at yielding
some fraction of the velocity the
limiting
2
of the lattice.(l)
velocity.
Another
FIG, 1. Ratio of yield strength to (E/p)‘12 as a function of homologous temperature.
plotted as a function
of the homologous temperature, TIT,, for Nb (1394) Fe,'?' W,'15,1"' Ta,(ll) ~o,U8-Z0, V,@n and 0.11 C stee1.(22,B) Tensile data are not available for Cr with a grain size comparable
to that con-
sidered here. The metals were all of fairly high purity
creased sharply as temperature
possible
in the form of elastic with the scatter-
Metals of high (~~p)~ can be expected
to dissipate the energy of a moving ,v
condition. yield
at
ing of sound waves, caused by the natural vibrations
,033
in which
are moving
is that it is related to the energy dissi-
waves, or to the damping associated
to the region
the
Since
of sound, it may simply
pated by the moving dislocations
confined
of
quantity (E/~ip)~in (1) has not been made as yet.
explanation
and were in the recrystallized
as for example,
with tungsten, where one set of data falls on the curve
represent
v
de-
well by a straight line with a slope of ---1,
of t,he metal.
IO5
as temperature
As may be seen in Fig. 1, the data are represented reasonably
Here, E is Young’s
increased
Values of G, represent the lower yield point,
readily,
so that higher applied
quired
to keep the dislocation
decreased.
more
moving
at constant
velocity. The observation lates the available annealed,
b.e.c.
that the parameter yield
data
(E/P)~ corre-
for relatively
metals lends strong support
idea that yielding
pure, to the
in these metals is related to dis-
location velocity. The author is indebted
to Dr. J. L. Lytton
many helpful and stimulating
for his
discussions.
Data were strength
dislocation
stresses would be re-
M.I.
in-
JACOBSON
A log-log
plot was chosen because it was felt that this depicted most fairly the sea&r
at low values of ~~/(E~p)~. The
values used for E, p and T,
are shown in the table
below :
_-E
Material
T m, “K
dyn/cm2 x lo-l2
P g/cm3
Nb FO MO Ta
2740 1800 2880 3270 3680 2170 1765
1.03 2.06 3.30 1.86 4.08 1.2S 2.11
8.57 7.87 10.2 16.6 19.3 6.10 7.87
7 0.11 c steel
-.
The modulus, E, and density, p, were assumed not to vary with temperature, since the temperature intervals were relatively short, namely, the int,erval in which the
References 1. A. H. COTTRELL, Dislocations and Elmtic Flow in Crystnb Clarendon Press, Oxford (1953). 2. A. H. COTTRELL, Trccns.Amer. Inst. Min,. (Netall.) Engrs. 212 192 (19581. Twns. Amer. Inst. Xrlin. (X&U.) Engrs. 3. E. T. W&EL: 209, 930 (1957). and N. J. PETCH, A&t Met. 3. 186 (19561. 4. A. CRACKNELL ,- G. SCIIOECK and A. SEEQER,Acta &let. 7, 469; (195$). ’ ;: H. CONRAD, d. Iron S’f. Inst. 198, 364 (1961). H. CONRAD and G. SCHOECK, Acta Met. 8, 791 (1960). (Metall.) Engrs. :: A. N. HOLDEN, Truns. Amer. Inst. Min. 192, 182 (1952). 9. J. El. BETCHTOLD, ET. WESSEL, and L. 1,. FRANCE, Re,fractoq Metals and Alloys (Ed. by M. SEMCHYSEN and J. J. WAR~~OOD). p. 25. Interscience, New York (1961). 10. 1\;.J. PETCH, Progress in Metal Physics (Ed. by B. Cu&MERS). Vol. 4, p. 1. Pergamon Press, London (1953). J. A&. Phys. 30, 129 Il. TN. G. JOHNSTON and J. J. GILMAX, (1959).
LETTERS
TO
12. D. F. STEIN and J. R. Low, Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 362 (1960). 13. M. A. ADAMS, A. C. ROBERTS, and R. E. SMALLM.AN,Acta ii: 16. 17.
ii: 20. 21. 22. 23.
.Met. 8, 328 (1960). A. A. JOHNSON, Acta Met. 8, 737 (1960). J. W. Pua~, Pmt. Amer. Sot. Testing Materials 57, 906 (1957). J. H. BECHTOI.D and P. W. SHEWXON, Trans. Amer. Sot. Metals 46, 397 (1954). W. S. OWEN, etal,Sub&u&we. and Mechanicat Properties of Refractory Metals Manufacturing Laboratories Prog. Rep. No. 3, Nov. 15, 1961. AF 33(616)-6838. A. WRONSKI and A. A. JOHNSON, Phil. Mag. 7,213 (1962). J. W. PUGH, Trans. Amer. Sot. Metals 47, 984 (1955). J. H. BECHTOLD, Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. (M&U.) Engrs. 19'9, 1469 (1953). J. W. PUGH, Trans. Amer. In.&. .I@&. (Metall.) Engrs. 209, 1244 (1957). J. HESLOP and N. 5. PETCH, Phil. Xag. I, 866 (1956). N. J. PETCH, Phil. Mug. 3, 1089 (1958).
* Raceivcd
April 11, 1962;
revised June 7, 1962.
THE
1123
EDITOR
much higher, the valence bonding should be considered basically
ionic.
Table
1 shows that the ionic
radii
sums agree with the observed
distance
not in TiN.
has the ionic size of
Oxygen
therefore
in TiO but
1.40 A (or 1.33 A) in TiO, and herein lies a possible explanation
of the reporG3) that,
whereas TiO dis-
solves 60 mol. oA TiN, TiN takes very little oxygen into solid solution, which is unexpected
since the unit
cell edges of TiO and TiN are the same to within 14 per cent.
Nitrogen
can dissolve
in TiO either
with the size of anion or with the size of a covalent atom without restriction,
but oxygen
in the interstitial compound
cannot dissolve
TiN as a covalent-me~llic
atom (r = 0.74 A) because of its demand to become an ion and adopt its ionic size (r = 1.40 A) in Ti, consistent with
the electronegativity
difference
and
ionicity
of TiO.
Comments
on “Evidence of metallic bonding in TiN”*
TABLE
The experimental results of Philipp(l) indicating metallic bonding in TIN are entirely in agreement with expectations
from consideration
of structural
chem-
1.
Compound
Observed interatomic distance in ip
Calculated ionic interatomic distance in A
TiO TiN
2.090 2.123
2.08 2.39
istry. Atoms definite
in the solid state behave as if they have a size ; two scales of atomic
recognized suitably
as
an
corrected
empirical
for coordination
within a few percent in crystals.
fact,
observed
accounted
since
bonding,
the
sums
etc. reproduce
interatomic
to
distances
Either the ionic scale, or the covalent-
metallic scale of radii is appropriat,e for a particular compound.
Covalent-metallic
which
must
be regarded
phase
of the HBgg type,@
covalent the
apply
permissible
The covalent-metaIlic
appropriate
to
as an interstitial
ratio
of
0.60
TIN
metallic
since the value
radius ratio TN/rTi is appropriately
lnaximum
phases.
sizes
Only the metallic conductivity
radii have been
of the
for,
such
radius of 0.74 A is thus
for N in TiN.
In TiO on the other hand, where the ionicity
is
of TiO remains to be
the basic
ionic
valence
this must arise from the wide extent
overlap of the occupied
and
(tzsf2 orbitals of the Ti atoms
which, in the octahedral structure,
ligand field of the rocksalt
point towards neighboring
Division of Pure Physics
Ti atoms. W. B.
PEARSON
National Research Council Ottawa, Canada
less than for
and despite
References 1. W.
PHILIPP, Acta iWet. 10, 583 (1962). 2. G. HXGG, Z. Phys. Chem. B 6, 221 (1930). 3. 0. SCHMITZ-DUMONT and K. STEINBERG, schaften 41, I17 { 1954). * Received
June 4. 1962.
Natwwissen-