Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the north China Plain

Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the north China Plain

Accepted Manuscript Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain Wenj...

2MB Sizes 11 Downloads 77 Views

Accepted Manuscript Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain Wenjun Qu, Jun Wang, Xiaoye Zhang, Lifang Sheng, Wencai Wang PII:

S1352-2310(15)30568-9

DOI:

10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.061

Reference:

AEA 14313

To appear in:

Atmospheric Environment

Received Date: 13 July 2015 Revised Date:

26 November 2015

Accepted Date: 28 November 2015

Please cite this article as: Qu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Sheng, L., Wang, W., Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain, Atmospheric Environment (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.061. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface

2

particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain

RI PT

1

1

4

SC

Wenjun Qu1, Jun Wang2, Xiaoye Zhang3, Lifang Sheng1, Wencai Wang1

3

Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Ocean-Atmosphere

Interaction and Climate in Universities of Shandong, Ocean University of China,

6

Qingdao 266100, China

2

7

TE D

Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration,

EP

3

Beijing 100081, China

AC C

10

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340, USA

8

9

M AN U

5

11

Revision submitted to Atmospheric Environment, November 26, 2015

12 13 14 15

*Corresponding to Wenjun Qu, Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China. Tel.: +86-532-66781309; fax: +86-532-66782790. e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

-1-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract: Great difference exists in the aerosol optical depth (AOD) between summer

17

and winter over the North China Plain (NCP). Monthly mean AOD at 550 nm derived

18

from the MODIS (MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) products during

19

2000 to 2014 over the area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E exhibits an annual maximum

20

in June (0.855 ± 0.130) and a minimum in December (0.381 ± 0.032). This

21

seasonality of AOD is in the opposite phase with the surface particulate matter (PM)

22

concentration (higher in winter and lower in summer). The possible causes for the

23

higher AOD in June (compared with December) include (a) a higher boundary layer

24

height (BLH) that results in more efficient transport and mixing of aerosol particles to

25

a higher altitude (corresponding to a lower particle concentration near surface) as

26

revealed by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations

27

profile, (b) a higher relative humidity (RH) due to the inshore monsoon circulation

28

that leads to enhancement of aerosol extinction, (c) emission from the regional open

29

stalk burning in the summer harvest season (as seen from MODIS fire products), and

30

(d) the typical eastward open topographical basin over NCP. Under the assumption

31

that the aerosol and water vapor are well mixed within the boundary layer, analysis on

32

multi-year average shows that the differences in BLH, RH and surface PM

33

concentration can explain up to 81% of the variance of monthly averaged AOD over

34

NCP. A preliminarily hypothesis is also suggested to interpret the shift of AOD

35

pattern from winter to summer with an abrupt increase of AOD from May to June, as

36

well as an increase of surface PM2.5 concentration over NCP during the early phase of

37

northward progress of the East Asia summer monsoon front.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

16

-2-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Keywords: Aerosol optical depth; Seasonality; Boundary layer height; North

39

China Plain

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

38

-3-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 40

1. Introduction Satellite measurement has been applied to air quality monitoring worldwide

42

including the North China Plain (NCP, Li et al, 2003); although a good relationship

43

has been established between the MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

44

(MODIS) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and surface PM2.5 (particulate matter (PM)

45

with diameter ≤ 2.5 µm) concentration in eastern and Midwestern USA (Engel-Cox et

46

al., 2004) and Alabama (Wang and Christopher, 2003), correlation between AOD and

47

surface PM2.5 is quite poor in western USA (Engel-Cox et al., 2004). A critical review

48

by Hoff and Christopher (2009) concluded that the derivation of surface PM2.5 from

49

satellite measurement of AOD (with a precision of ±20%) has an uncertainty of ±30%

50

(or larger), AOD should combine with ground-based measurement and model to

51

improve PM estimation from space.

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

41

Li et al. (2003) validated the MODIS aerosol products and identified three high

53

AOD areas in eastern China (ECN). In north China, a discrepancy in the seasonal

54

variations of AOD and surface particle concentration has been identified, which was

55

partly attributed to the variation of atmospheric mixing layer height (Xia et al., 2006).

56

Wang et al. (2012) reported the contrasting trends between PM10 and the aerosol

57

optical extinction in China, USA, Canada and Europe from 1992 to 2011, and

58

emphasized contribution from the increased fraction of anthropogenic aerosol

59

emission (mostly fine particle). Besides the vertical profile and size distribution of the

60

aerosol, are there any other factors also contribute to the seasonal variation of AOD in

61

north China?

AC C

EP

52

-4-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT While the wintertime air pollution (as well as haze and fog) is recognized as a

63

major concern in ECN (Yang et al., 2013a; Zhao et al., 2013; Boynard et al., 2014),

64

past studies also investigated the increasing trend of summertime air quality

65

deterioration in the region from both the meteorology (Qu et al., 2013) and the

66

emission (Li et al., 2010) perspectives. An overall comparatively better surface air

67

quality in summer (than in winter) over ECN can be easily understood because of the

68

greater boundary layer height (BLH) which is more favorable for dilution and

69

diffusion of the pollutants as well as the more intensive precipitation which is more

70

favorable for wet scavenging of the particle. For example, the surface fine particle

71

concentration in Wuhan, China was found to be mainly depends on variation in the

72

convective BLH (Kong and Yi, 2015). However, it is interesting that the better air

73

quality and lower PM concentration near surface in summer is in contrast with the

74

higher summertime AOD (will be discussed in section 3) over NCP (generally the

75

area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E, Fig. 1). This study will examine the factors

76

contributing to the higher AOD in June (compared with the lower AOD in December)

77

over NCP.

78

2. Data

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

79

RI PT

62

The data used in this study include MODIS Terra AOD products (1×1 degree grid)

80

from

March

2000

to

December

81

(http://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/) and the GOCART (Goddard Chemistry

82

Aerosol Radiation and Transport, Mian et al., 2002) modeled CODs (column optical

-5-

2014

from

Giovanni

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 83

depth) for different aerosol components in 2000 – 2007 (formerly distributed by

84

Giovanni, accessed by July 2015), as well as the AERONET AOD data at Beijing

85

(116.381°

86

(http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/webtool_opera_v2_new). The aerosol extinction

87

coefficient at 532 nm derived from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder

88

Satellite

89

(https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/calipso/cal_lid_l3_apro_allsky-beta-v1-30_table)

90

is used to reflect vertical distribution of the aerosol. Relative humidity (RH) and wind

91

(2.5×2.5 degree grid) from NCEP (United States National Centers for Environmental

92

Prediction)

93

(http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html)

94

(0.125×0.125 degree grid) from ECMWF (European Center for Medium-Range

95

Weather Forecasts) reanalysis data (http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/) are also used to

96

make comparison of meteorology between summer and winter.

39.977°

E)

March

(CALIPSO)

2001

level

3

to

October

2013

allsky

product

M AN U

SC

Observations

from

RI PT

N,

reanalysis

data BLH

TE D

and

In addition, the available PM10 (particles with diameter ≤ 10 µm) concentration in

98

34 major Chinese cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012 is derived from the air pollution

99

index

AC C

EP

97

from

the

Ministry of

Environment

Protection

of

China

(MEPC,

100

http://datacenter.mep.gov.cn/) using the method in Qu et al. (2010). Similarly, the

101

available PM2.5 concentration in 142 Chinese cities in 2014 is also derived from the

102

air quality index from MEPC. These data are used to reflect the seasonal variation of

103

surface PM concentration over NCP.

104

Moreover, the surface visibility (Vis), wind speed and RH extracted from the

-6-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Global Summary of Day (GSOD) database (ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod) for

106

354 stations in China are used to assess impact of the northward progress of East Asia

107

summer monsoon. Detail of these data is described in Qu et al. (2013, 2015b).

108

3. Contrast between AOD and surface PM seasonality over NCP

RI PT

105

The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China during 2000 to 2014

110

demonstrates that the AOD seasonal contrast is most distinct over NCP; AOD in June

111

is generally larger than 0.6 (> 0.9 over most of the area, Fig. 1a) and AOD in

112

December generally ranges from 0.36 to 0.6 over NCP (Fig. 1b, also see

113

supplementary material 1 for the yearly comparison), which reflects the greatest

114

seasonal difference of monthly AOD in China. NCP is also the major high AOD area

115

in China; the AOD hotspot area over NCP is generally constrained within the NCP

116

topographical basin (supplementary material 1), which is expected because the basin

117

is always most densely populated with intensive anthropogenic emission, consistent

118

with Li et al. (2003) that human activities are the main source of aerosols in ECN. In

119

addition, the obvious interannual variation in spatial coverage of the higher AOD area

120

over ECN (supplementary material 1) is beyond the scope of this study.

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

121

SC

109

Fig. 2 shows the time series of AOD and surface PM concentration. The monthly

122

averaged MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over NCP during 2000 to 2014 obviously

123

illustrates an annual maximum in June (0.855 ± 0.130, Fig. 2a) and a minimum in

124

December (0.381 ± 0.032). The AERONET monthly averaged AOD at Beijing (Fig.

125

2b) generally shows a synchronous variation with the MODIS AOD over NCP, and

-7-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 126

significant correlations (R = 0.72 – 0.75, P < 0.0001 significance, n = 135) exist

127

between the monthly averaged AERONET AODs at 440 nm, 675 nm, 870 nm and

128

1020 nm at Beijing with the monthly averaged MODIS AOD over NCP. Fig. 2c shows monthly surface PM10 mass concentration in 34 major Chinese

130

cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012. In discrepancy with the higher AOD in June

131

(compared with the lower AOD in December), the surface PM10 concentration in June

132

is generally lower than that in December; similarly, the PM2.5 concentration varies in

133

a same way as PM10 (supplementary material 2). It must be noted here that the

134

MODIS AOD is an ambient measurement, but the surface PM measurement is

135

generally made by using of the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance analyzers

136

(TEOMs, model 1400a, Rupprecht & Patashnick, USA) at an elevated temperature

137

(50 °C), thus suffers loss of materials such as the semi-volatile and hygroscopic

138

species (see detail in Qu et al., 2010). A discussion of the possible causes resulting in

139

such contrast between the phase of monthly variation of AOD and PM will follow.

140

4. Possible causes of the AOD seasonality over NCP

141

4.1. Emission

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

142

RI PT

129

Over ECN, the presumably intensive and continuous anthropogenic emission (of

143

the aerosol and its precursor gases) due to house heating is believed to be an important

144

additional source in winter. Such an intensive anthropogenic emission in winter is

145

supported by the high wintertime black carbon and brown carbon concentration

146

reported in Beijing during 2002 to 2013 (Li et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the higher

-8-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 147

mineral dust concentration in Beijing in spring (Li et al., 2015) is consistent with the

148

more intensive springtime dust emission.

149

On the other hand, an inspection of global fire maps from the National Aeronautics

151

(http://www.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/GlobalMaps/view.php?d1=MOD14A1_M_FI

152

RE#) shows clear fire points from Shandong Peninsula to the north of Yangtze River

153

in ECN (the major NCP area) in June every year, suggesting potential additional

154

emission sources favorable for high AOD over this area in June. Such an additional

155

June emission is most probably associated with the regional intensive open stalk

156

burning in the summer harvest season. Individual particle study did identify evidence

157

of the contribution from regional agricultural biomass burning to high AOD in Beijing

158

and north China in June 2007 (Li et al., 2010). This regional open, out-of-order and

159

uncontrolled stalk burning is a major emission source over NCP in the summer

160

harvest season. For example, the agricultural biomass burning has been found to be

161

associated with the AOD peak value in June over ECN (Yang et al., 2013b).

162

Observation of a clearly increased black carbon concentration in June (comparable

163

with those in December, January and February) at Beijing (Li et al., 2015) also

164

supports this point.

Space

Administration

earth

observatory

system

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

165

and

RI PT

150

In addition to emission, BLH (associated with vertical distribution of the aerosol)

166

and meteorology (including wind and RH) are the other important factors influencing

167

AOD and PM concentration and will be discussed next.

168

4.2. BLH and vertical extinction profile

-9-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ∆BLH, defined as the difference of BLH at 14:00 local time (derived from

170

ECMWF model, see section 2) between June and December during 2000 – 2013,

171

shows that BLH in June is generally greater than BLH in December by at least 350

172

meter over the AOD hotspots area from Shandong Peninsula to the north of Yangtze

173

River in ECN (i.e., NCP, Fig. 3a); the higher BLH could result in more efficient

174

transport and mixing of particles to a higher altitude (layer), leading to an increase of

175

column AOD in June (compared to December) but possibly a decrease of surface PM

176

concentration, consistent with Kong and Yi (2015).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

169

A comparison of the CALIPSO extinction profiles between June and December in

178

2014 over NCP (Fig. 3b) does illustrate a higher extinction coefficient in June at a

179

higher altitude, especially above ~600 meter where both the day and night extinction

180

coefficients in June are much higher than those in December. The higher extinction

181

coefficient above ~600 meter in the vertical profile in June (compared with that in

182

December) is consistent with the higher BLH (favorable for more efficient transport

183

and mixing of particles to a higher altitude) as well as the higher column integrated

184

AOD. The peak extinction coefficient layers located aloft in the June profiles (relative

185

to the December profiles) and the significant difference in extinction coefficient

186

between higher altitude and near surface in Fig. 3b can interpret the higher AOD and

187

lower surface PM concentration in June.

AC C

EP

TE D

177

188

Fig. 3e shows the monthly average BLH over the area of 30–40° N and 110–120°

189

E during 2000 – 2013. As BLH is much different between land and ocean (Fig. 3a),

190

120° E is chosen as the east boundary to plot the monthly BLH time series over the

-10-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT major land area within the study area. A comparably higher BLH is found in June

192

(only slightly lower than that in May and April), consistent with the higher AOD then.

193

On the contrary, a lower BLH in December (Fig. 3e) is consistent with the lowest

194

AOD over NCP in December (Fig. 2a and 2b).

195

4.3. Other meteorological and topographical factors

RI PT

191

NCP is an eastward open topographical basin surrounded by the Yanshan

197

Mountains to the north, by the Taihang Mountains and the Qinling Mountains to the

198

west, and by the Daba Mountains and the Dabie Mountains to the south (see

199

supplementary material 1). The difference of wind vector between June and December

200

illustrates a prevailing inshore (southeast and south) wind in June (Fig. 3c), which

201

favors accumulation of the pollutants (originated from the intensive anthropogenic

202

emission in this densely populated region) within the topographical basin of NCP and

203

influx of the moisture from the ocean. Correspondingly, the RH profile (Fig. 3d) as

204

well as the difference of RH between June and December at 850 hPa level (Fig. 3c)

205

demonstrates a higher RH in June from 1000 hPa to 300 hPa levels over the AOD

206

hotspots area of NCP. Meanwhile, a significant increase of RH from May to June is

207

obvious at 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels over the area of 30–40° N and

208

110–120° E (Fig. 3f). Here the 850 hPa pressure level, which is comparable to ~1900

209

meter of the average BLH in June (Fig. 3e), is chosen to reflect RH at the upper level

210

of the boundary layer (BL). Such an increase of RH in June at different levels is

211

favorable for enhancement in new particle speciation (NPS) and secondary aerosol

212

formation (such as sulfate and organic aerosol, Sun et al., 2013) as well as in

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

196

-11-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 213

hygroscopic growth of the aerosol (Qu et al., 2015a); all these processes can

214

subsequently result in enhanced aerosol extinction as well as increase of the column

215

AOD and impairment of visibility (Vis). Indeed, increase of AOD is found to be associated with increase of the total

217

column water vapor content (CWV, Smirnov et al., 2002; Eck et al., 2008). Bi et al.

218

(2014) identified a strong positive correlation between AOD and CWV at Beijing in

219

January 2013. Aerosol water content was found to contribute significantly to the light

220

extinction under Asian continental outflow (Jung and Kim, 2011), and its effect on

221

light extinction and Vis impairment is mainly due to increases of the (NH4)2SO4 and

222

NH4NO3 concentration (Jung et al., 2009).

M AN U

SC

RI PT

216

Along this line, a comparison of the GOCART (Mian et al., 2002) modeled CODs

224

(column optical depth) of the aerosol components in 2000 – 2007 shows that sulfate

225

has the greatest COD difference between June and December (supplementary material

226

3). The higher sulfate COD over NCP in June is consistent with the initial significant

227

increase of RH from May to June (Fig. 3f), which confirms that increase of RH and

228

enhancement of hygroscopic growth of sulfate (a major aerosol component)

229

contribute crucially to the maximal AOD in June over NCP. Moreover, the high

230

sulfate COD center (> 0.1, shaded with blue to yellow) spans all over ECN in June but

231

only limits within the more south part of ECN in December, consistent with the

232

general spatial and temporal distribution of higher RH. Similarly, the high BC area

233

also limits within the south part of ECN in December and shows a broadly northward

234

extension in June, but with a weaker summer vs. winter contrast compared with

AC C

EP

TE D

223

-12-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 235

sulfate (figures not shown). The June vs. December difference of CODs for other

236

aerosol components is unobvious and not considered.

237

Furthermore, according to the IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual

Environments)

reconstruction

method

239

(http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/ReconBext/reconBext.htm) for aerosol

240

scattering (which is a major component of aerosol extinction), the scattering

241

coefficient (Bscat) can be calculated using the following formula,

SC

RI PT

238

Bscat (Mm-1) = 3fT(rh)[Sulfate] + 3 fT(rh) [Nitrate] + 4 forg(rh) [OMC]

M AN U

242

+ 1 [Soil] + 0.6 [CM]

243

(1)

where [Sulfate] and [Nitrate] are mass concentrations calculated based on the forms of

245

(NH4)2SO4 and NH4NO3, [OMC] is the organic mass by carbon, [Soil] is the mass of

246

fine dust aerosol and [CM] is the coarse mass; while fT(rh) and forg(rh) are the relative

247

humidity correction factors for converting dry scattering coefficient to ambient value.

248

Three times of fT(rh) and four times of forg(rh) in formula (1) demonstrate that

249

scattering of aerosol components such as sulfate, nitrate and organic matter can be

250

strongly enhanced when RH increases, which supports the conjecture above that the

251

higher RH and higher sulfate contribution to the aerosol profile over NCP in June are

252

associated with an increase of AOD due to enhancement of the aerosol extinction

253

efficiency.

AC C

EP

TE D

244

254

In summary, the comparably higher BLH in June (Fig. 3e) is favorable for more

255

efficient transport and mixing of particles to a higher elevation, which results in a

256

higher AOD but a smaller surface PM concentration. On the contrary, in December

-13-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the lower BLH (Fig. 3e) is associated with accumulation of the particles near surface

258

but a lower extinction coefficient in the vertical profile (Fig. 3b) and subsequently a

259

lower AOD. Moreover, accumulation of the pollutants within the eastward open

260

topographical basin of NCP and influx of the moisture (as well as increase of RH)

261

accompanied with the prevailing inshore wind in June (Fig. 3c) are also favorable for

262

the enhancement of aerosol extinction and for the higher AOD over NCP. An

263

integration of these factors is followed in section 5.

264

5. A simple model to reconcile AOD and PM seasonality

M AN U

SC

RI PT

257

AOD is in proportion to the product of PM concentration, the shape of aerosol

266

extinction profile (H) and RH correction factors (f(rh)) (Kessner et al., 2013). Here

267

the PM10 concentration during 2005–2012 and PM2.5 concentration during 2014 in 34

268

major Chinese cities within NCP are used to calculate the monthly PM concentration.

269

The monthly averaged BLH over NCP during 2005–2012 is used to reflect variation

270

of H. RH at the 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels are used to calculate the

271

monthly averaged RH within BL, which is subsequently used to determine f(rh) value

272

(http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/humidity_correction.htm). Note BLH at

273

14:00 local time is used, while RH and PM are derived from daily averages; these

274

measurements are not coincident in time with the MODIS satellite overpass. Although

275

monthly averages are compared here, disagreement is expected due to difference in

276

the temporal coverage of measurements. Assuming the aerosol and water vapor are

277

well mixed within BL, the PM concentration, f(rh) and BLH is used to establish a

AC C

EP

TE D

265

-14-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 278

simple model, and PM*BLH*f(rh) can thus reflect the variation of AOD due to

279

aerosol extinction in BL, which is subsequently compared with the monthly averaged

280

MODIS AOD over NCP. There is generally a synchronous variation between the multi-year averaged

282

monthly PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD over NCP (with a June maximum and a December

283

minimum, Fig. 4a and 4b); moreover, significant correlations also exist between

284

PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD (R2 = 0.81 and 0.74 for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively, P <

285

0.0005, n = 12, Fig. 4d and 4e). Although individually PM, BLH and f(rh) can not

286

well explain the AOD variation, BLH in collaboration with the surface PM

287

concentration (PM) and the RH correction factor (f(rh)) can explain about 81% or

288

74% of the variance of monthly averaged AOD over NCP. Consequently, the simple

289

model supports our discussion in section 4 that the large values of BLH, RH and the

290

corresponding emission and PM concentration are major possible causes of the

291

maximal AOD in June over NCP. Note here only the available surface PM

292

concentration is used in the comparison between PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD.

SC

M AN U

TE D

EP

Moreover, analysis on individual cities in the specific months identifies

AC C

293

RI PT

281

294

significant (P < 0.0001 significance level) correlation (R2 = 0.12 – 0.41, n = 103 – 151)

295

between PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD for 22 of the 34 cities over NCP (for more detail

296

see supplementary material 4); the unmatched AOD, BLH and RH (extracted from 1.0,

297

0.125 and 2.5 degree grid data) and PM10 concentration (measured at a specific

298

location) is an expected source of error, and averaging over space and time could

299

result in better agreement between PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD (discussed above).

-15-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Indeed, the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD over NCP during 2004

301

– 2012 varied synchronously (Fig. 4c), and a stronger correlation (R2 = 0.53, P <

302

0.0001 significance, n = 103, Fig. 4f) is found between them.

303

6. Preliminary hypothesis about impact of EASM front

RI PT

300

It is well known that the shift of the winter and summer monsoon is a major

305

characteristic of weather and climate over East Asia. Climatologically, the phasic

306

northward progress of the summer monsoon front (SMF) experiences three times

307

abrupt advance and four quiescent stages. SMF is located at the north part of south

308

China during its first quiescent stage (May 16 to June 10, SMF1, Fig 5a), and then

309

marches to the Yangtze River Basin, the Yellow River and Huai River Basin, and

310

north China during its second (June 16 to July 5, SMF2), third (July 6 to July 20,

311

SMF3) and fourth (July 21 to August 10, SMF4) quiescent stages, respectively (Wu et

312

al., 2002). To facilitate the discussion, SMF0 (Apr 20 to May 15), a period with the

313

same duration of but before SMF1, is defined to supply a background before the East

314

Asia summer monsoon (EASM) developing.

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

315

SC

304

Monthly variation shows an abrupt increase of AOD over NCP from May to June

316

(Fig. 4a). More specifically, there is an obvious AOD increase over NCP from SMF0

317

(Fig. 6a) to SMF1 (Fig. 6b); meanwhile, the higher AOD (> 0.9, shaded with red) area

318

over ECN experiences a further northward displacement from SMF1 (Fig. 6b) to

319

SMF2 (Fig. 6c). Correspondingly, the PM10 concentration exhibits a comparably

320

higher value from December to May (Fig. 2c, associated with additional emission

-16-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from house heating in winter and contribution from dust in spring), followed by June

322

with the highest PM10 concentration in summer (June, July and August). Similar

323

variation for the one-year record of monthly PM2.5 concentration in 2014

324

(supplementary material 2) also indicated the highest June PM concentration in

325

summer. More in detail, the difference between SMF1 and SMF0 shows a significant

326

increase of PM2.5 concentration over the major south part of ECN (Fig. 7a), which is

327

consistent with the increase of multi-year averaged RH from SMF0 to SMF1 in this

328

region (Fig. 7c). A comparison of the spatial distribution of PM2.5 and RH differences

329

shows that the area with a slight and initial RH increase (0 to 2%, shaded with green

330

in Fig. 7c) seems like the area with a greater PM2.5 increase (generally > 15 µg m–3,

331

Fig. 7a). These AOD and PM variations could be interpreted by a preliminary

332

hypothesis of the possibly enhanced formation of the secondary aerosol (SOA)

333

accompanied with the northward progress of EASM (as conceptually illustrated in Fig.

334

5b).

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

321

The spatial displacement of SMF associated with EASM development can result

336

in changes in the converging of precursor gases (of aerosol) with moisture introduced

337

by EASM into the region. The key point here is that during the drier period before

338

EASM prevailing (i.e., the winter and spring associated with presumably more

339

intensive anthropogenic emission), although the aerosol precursor gases is abundant in

340

the atmosphere, the water vapor is presumably in deficit over ECN and serves as an

341

important rate control condition for SOA formation. In this context, northward

342

introduction of the water vapor into ECN and increase of RH during the early phase of

AC C

EP

335

-17-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EASM development is crucial to SOA formation. When converging and mixing of the

344

precursor gases of aerosol with the moisture from south occur, ECN becomes a good

345

place with more efficient photochemical activity, leading to enhancement of NPS,

346

SOA formation and hygroscopic growth. Indeed, the NPS events in urban Beijing

347

were usually associated with changes in wind directions (Zhang et al., 2011),

348

implying that mixing of the precursor gases with moisture (occurred during

349

converging of different air masses) is favorable for photochemical activities and NPS,

350

which supports our hypothesis above. Such an enhanced SOA formation can

351

potentially influence AOD and PM concentration. Here, PM2.5 concentration is used to

352

evaluate the PM variation associated with SOA formation because SOA should be

353

within the size range of fine particle.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

343

On the other hand, for the area of Guangdong Province (the most south of ECN,

355

nearby Hainan Island) with a significant RH increase from SMF0 to SMF1 (2% to 8%,

356

shaded with yellow to orange in Fig. 7c), the PM2.5 concentration decreases (Fig. 7a),

357

probably due to more efficient wet scavenging when RH increases further. This is

358

confirmed by the shift from SMF1 to SMF2, accompanying with a general significant

359

increase of RH (> 10%, Fig. 7d) and a decrease of PM2.5 concentration (Fig. 7b) over

360

the major area of ECN.

EP

AC C

361

TE D

354

Moreover, variation of Vis accompanied with the northward progress of EASM

362

also supports our hypothesis. As Vis shows an interannual decreasing trend over ECN

363

(Qu et al., 2013, 2015b), here the normalized Vis is calculated based on each station

364

during May 16 to August 10 (i.e., the period spans over the four quiescent stages of

-18-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT SMF) each year to assess the phasic variation of Vis due to the northward progress of

366

SMF. Our analysis finds that the south part of ECN experiences a Vis improvement

367

accompanied with the northward progress of SMF, while NCP (30–40° N and

368

110–125° E) experiences a Vis degradation during the same course (supplementary

369

material 5); the increase of RH and the decrease of surface wind speed

370

(supplementary material 6, here wind speed is also normalized using the same method

371

for Vis) might be possible causes favorable for enhancement of NPS and SOA

372

formation as well as Vis degradation over NCP accompanied with the northward

373

progress of SMF.

M AN U

SC

RI PT

365

Based on these analyses, we can hypothesize the impact of EASM front on a

375

possible enhancement of SOA formation, which contributes to the significant increase

376

of PM2.5 concentration and the corresponding increase of AOD from SMF0 to SMF1

377

over NCP.

378

7. Conclusion

EP

TE D

374

In contrast to the lower surface PM concentration in summer, AOD shows an

380

obvious increase in summer (June) compared with winter (December) over NCP.

381

Several factors work in concert to result in this opposite seasonality of AOD and

382

surface PM.

AC C

379

383

(i) Increase of BLH, associated with more efficient transport and mixing of

384

particles to a higher altitude, results in a higher extinction coefficient near

385

and above the top of BLH and therefore, a higher AOD but a decrease of

-19-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 386

surface PM concentration over NCP in June. (ii) Converging and mixing of the precursor gases of aerosol with the

388

moisture introduced by EASM, which subsequently results in an increase

389

of RH and enhancement of NPS, SOA formation and hygroscopic growth

390

(especially for sulfate as a major aerosol component).

392

(iii) Emission from regional open stalk burning in the summer harvest season.

SC

391

RI PT

387

(iv) The typical southeast and south wind and the mountains to the north and

394

west (generally ≥ 1500 meter above sea level) resulting in accumulation

395

and restriction of pollutants within the NCP topographical "basin".

M AN U

393

BLH, RH in collaboration with PM concentration can well explain the multi-year

397

averaged monthly variation of AOD. These factors need to be considered when

398

investigating the climate effect of aerosol in the region.

TE D

396

The increase of AOD and PM concentration over NCP in early summer can be

400

attributed to possible enhanced new particle speciation and SOA formation during the

401

early phase of EASM (section 6). The presumably intensive solar radiation, high RH

402

and high temperature over ECN in summer are all favorable for the enhancement of

403

photochemical activity and SOA formation. However, the suggested hypothesis

404

should be further investigated. Observation and study on the contribution of SOA to

405

the total aerosol, on the possibly seasonal variation of aerosol components, as well as

406

on influx and impact of the ocean originated materials (such as sea salt,

407

dimethylsulfide (Ma et. al., 2005), etc.) accompanied with EASM should be helpful to

AC C

EP

399

-20-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT improve our understanding in the future. Clarifying the variation of AOD and PM

409

accompanied with the establishing and prevailing of EASM is potentially helpful to

410

study the feedback and interaction between the increased aerosol loading and the

411

variation of monsoon intensity in the region.

412

Acknowledgments:

SC

TE D

M AN U

Education’s 111 Project (B07036).

EP

414

This research is supported by NSFC 41276009 and Chinese Ministry of

AC C

413

RI PT

408

-21-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 415

References Bi, J.R., Huang, J.P., Hu, Z.Y., Holben, B.N., Guo, Z.Q., 2014. Investigate the aerosol optical and radiative characteristics of heavy haze episodes in Beijing during January of 2013. Journal of Geophysical Research, DOI: 10.1002/2014JD021757.

419 420 421 422

Boynard, A., Clerbaux, C., Clarisse, L., Safieddine, S., Pommier, M., Damme, M.V., Bauduin, S., Oudot, C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P.-F., 2014. First simultaneous space measurements of atmospheric pollutants in the boundary layer from IASI: A case study in the North China Plain. Geophysical Research Letters 41, doi:10.1002/2013GL058333.

423 424 425 426 427

Eck, T.F., Holben, B.N., Reid, J.S., Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Giles, D., O’Neill, N.T., Tsay, S.-C., Ji, Q., Mandoos, A.A., Khan, M.R., Reid, E.A., Schafer, J.S., Sorokine, M., Newcomb, W., Slutsker, I., 2008. Spatial and temporal variability of column-integrated aerosol optical properties in the southern Arabian Gulf and United Arab Emirates in summer. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, D01204, doi:10.1029/2007JD008944.

428 429 430

Engel-Cox, J.A., Holloman, C.H., Coutant, B.W., Hoff, R.M., 2004. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2495–2509.

431 432 433 434 435 436

Hoff, R.M., Christopher, S.A., 2009. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: Have we reached the promised land? Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 59, 645–675.Jung, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y.J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, J., Fan, S., 2009. Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River Delta campaign. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 3231–3244.

437 438 439 440

Jung, J., Kim, Y.J., 2011. Tracking sources of severe haze episodes and their physicochemical and hygroscopic properties under Asian continental outflow: Long-range transport pollution, postharvest biomass burning, and Asian dust. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, D02206, doi:10.1029/2010JD014555.

441 442

Kessner, A.L., Wang, J., Levy, R.C., Colarco, P.R., 2013. Remote sensing of surface visibility from space: A look at the United States East Coast. Atmospheric Environment 81, 136–147.

443 444 445

Kong, W., Yi, F., 2015. Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a location of a central China megacity. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, 7928–7940.

446 447 448

Li, C., Mao, J., Lau, K.A., Chen, J., Yuan, Z., Liu, X., Zhu, A., Liu, G., 2003. Characteristics of distribution and seasonal variation of aerosol optical depth in eastern China with MODIS products. Chinese Science Bulletin 48, 2488–2495.

449 450

Li, W.J., Shao, L.Y., Buseck, P.R., 2010. Haze types in Beijing and the influence of agricultural biomass burning. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 8119–8130.

451 452

Li, Z., Li, L., Zhang, F., Li, D., Xie, Y., Xu, H., 2015. Comparison of aerosol properties over Beijing and Kanpur: Optical, physical properties and aerosol component composition

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

416 417 418

-22-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT retrieved from 12 years ground-based Sun-sky radiometer remote sensing data. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, 1520–1535.

455 456 457

Ma, Q., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Liu, L., Dai, M., 2005. Seawater, atmospheric dimethylsulfide and aerosol ions in the Pearl River Estuary and the adjacent northern South China Sea. Journal of Sea Research 53, 131–145.

458 459 460 461

Mian, C., Paul, G., Stefan, K., Omar, T., Brent, N.H., Bryan, N.D., Randall, V.M., Jennifer, A.L., Akiko, H., Teruyuki, N., 2002. Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements. Journal of the Atmospheric Science, 59, 461–483.

462 463 464

Qu, W.J., Arimoto, R., Zhang, X.Y., Zhao, C.H., Wang, Y.Q., Sheng, L.F., Fu, G., 2010. Spatial distribution and interannual variation of surface PM10 concentrations over eighty-six Chinese cities. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 5641–5662.

465 466 467

Qu, W., Wang, J., Gao, S., Wu, T., 2013. Effect of the strengthened western Pacific subtropical high on summer visibility decrease over eastern China since 1973. Journal of Geophysical Research 118, 7142–7156.

468 469 470

Qu, W.J., Wang, J., Zhang, X.Y., Wang, D., Sheng, L.F., 2015a. Influence of relative humidity on aerosol composition: Impacts on light extinction and visibility impairment at two sites in coastal area of China. Atmospheric Research 153, 500–511.

471 472

Qu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Gao, S., 2015b. Effect of cold wave on winter visibility over eastern China. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, doi:10.1002/2014JD021958.

473 474 475

Smirnov, A., Holben, B.N., Dubovik, O., O'Neill, N.T., Eck, T.F., Westphal, D.L., Goroch, A.K., Pietras, C., Slutsker, I., 2002. Atmospheric aerosol optical properties in the Persian Gulf. Journal of Atmospheric Science 59 (3), 620–634.

476 477 478

Sun, Y.L., Wang, Z.F., Fu, P.Q., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., Ge, X.L., 2013. The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes during wintertime in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment 77, 927–934.

479 480 481

Wang, J., Christopher, S.A., 2003. Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophysical Research Letters 30(21), 2095, doi:10.1029/2003GL018174.

482 483 484

Wang, K.C., Dickinson, R.E., Su, L., Trenberth, K.E., 2012. Contrasting trends of mass and optical properties of aerosols over the Northern Hemisphere from 1992 to 2011. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12, 9387–9398.

485 486

Wu, R.S., 2002. Principles of modern synoptic meteorology (in Chinese), 319 pp., Higher Education Press, Beijing.

487 488 489

Xia, X.A., Chen, H.B., Wang, P.C., Zhang, W.X., Goloub, P., Chatenet, B., Eck, T.F., Holben B.N., 2006. Variation of column-integrated aerosol properties in a Chinese urban region. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, D05204.

490

Yang, K., Dickerson, R.R., Carn, S.A., Ge, C., Wang J., 2013a. First observations of SO2 from the

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

453 454

-23-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT satellite Suomi NPP OMPS: Widespread air pollution events over China. Geophysical Research Letters 40, doi:10.1002/grl.50952.

493 494 495

Yang, Y.J., Fu, Y.F., Wu, B.W., Shi, C.E, Deng, X.L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., 2013b. Impacts of agricultural fire on aerosol distribution over East China during summer harvest time. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics 8(4), 241–252.

496 497 498

Zhang, Y.M., Zhang, X.Y., Sun, J.Y., Lin, W.L., Gong, S.L., Shen, X.J., Yang, S., 2011. Characterization of new particle and secondary aerosol formation during summertime in Beijing, China. Tellus 63B, 382–394.

499 500 501

Zhao, X.J., Zhao, P.S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W.W., Dong, F., He, D., Shi, Q.F., 2013. Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 5685–5696.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

491 492

-24-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 502

Figure captions:

503

Fig. 1.

The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China in (a) June and (b) December during 2000 to 2014. The AOD contrast is significant over NCP

505

(the area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E, indicated by a black box with the

506

North China Plain as a principal part).

Fig. 2.

(a) MODIS Terra monthly averaged AOD at 550 nm over NCP from January

SC

507

RI PT

504

2005 to December 2012. The red and green arrows indicate AOD in June

509

and December, respectively. (b) AERONET monthly averaged AOD

510

(interpolating using values at 440 nm and 675 nm) at Beijing (116.381° N,

511

39.977° E) from January 2005 to December 2012. The red and green arrows

512

indicate AOD in June and December, respectively. (c) Monthly PM10 mass

513

concentration in 34 major Chinese cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012. The

514

box-and-stem plots depict the minimum, the 1th, 5th, 25th, 50th (median),

515

75th, 95th, 99th percentile and the maximum for the PM10 concentration; the

516

square in the box depicts the arithmetic mean. The geometric mean of the

518 519

520

TE D

EP

AC C

517

M AN U

508

monthly PM10 concentration for the 34 cities in June and December also presented. Those in June and December are shown in red and green, respectively.

Fig. 3.

(a) The difference of average boundary layer height (BLH, meter) at 14:00

521

local time between June and December (∆BLH = BLHJune – BLHDecember)

522

during 2000 – 2013. BLH in June is generally greater than BLH in

-25-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 523

December by at least 350 meter over the AOD hotspots area from Shandong

524

Peninsula to the north of Yangtze River in eastern China. The black box

525

indicates NCP. (b) Vertical profile of the aerosol extinction coefficient at 532

526

nm (km

527

30–40° N and 110–120° E in June and December 2014. (c) The difference of

528

mean wind vector and relative humidity (RH) between June and December

529

(June minus December, ∆RH = RHJune – RHDecember) during 2000 – 2013 at

530

850 hPa (1475 gpm, geopotential height in meters) level, the white line

531

illustrates the zero line of ∆RH (i.e., the mean RH in June is equal to that in

532

December), the black box indicates NCP; the results at surface, 1000 hPa

533

(110 gpm), 925 hPa (762 gpm) and 700 hPa (3012 gpm) levels are similar

534

and not shown. The difference of RH generally shows a higher RH over the

535

AOD hotspots area in June compared with December. (d) The RH profile in

536

June and December over NCP during 2000 – 2013, a higher RH in June is

537

obvious from 1000 hPa to 300 hPa levels. (e) The monthly average BLH

538

over the area of 30–40° N and 110–120° E during 2000 – 2013. (f) same as

540

541

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

RI PT

, derived from CALIPSO level 3 allsky product) over the area of

AC C

539

–1

(e) but for relative humidity (RH, %) at 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels.

Fig. 4.

(a) MODIS Terra monthly averaged AOD at 550 nm over NCP during

542

2001–2013. (b) Monthly product of PM concentration, boundary layer height

543

(BLH, at 14:00 local time) and RH correction factors (f(rh)) (PM*BLH*f(rh))

544

over NCP. (c) Time series of the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh)

-26-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and AOD over NCP during 2004 – 2012. (d) Linear fitting between the

546

monthly averaged AOD and PM10*BLH*f(rh) over NCP. (e) same as (d) but

547

for PM2.5. (f) same as (d) but for the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh)

548

and AOD over NCP during 2004 – 2012.

549

Fig. 5.

RI PT

545

(a) Change of the summer monsoon front (SMF) illustrated by the average position of the 850 hPa level pseudoequivalent potential temperature θse =

551

340 K contour during 1971 – 1980 (follow Wu et al., 2002). Here SMF1,

552

SMF2, SMF3 and SMF4 are corresponding to May 16 to June 10, June 16 to

553

July 5, July 6 to July 20 and July 21 to August 10, respectively; the average

554

positions of SMF during these four quiescent stages are demonstrated (detail

555

in section 6 of the main text). (b) A conceptual illustration of the enhanced

556

formation of the secondary aerosol due to northward transport of the

557

moisture (as well as initial increase of relative humidity, RH) and subsequent

558

converging and mixing with the precursor gases of aerosol over eastern

559

China (ECN) during the early stage of the East Asia summer monsoon

560

(EASM), which results in more efficient photochemical activity. Further

562

M AN U

TE D

EP

AC C

561

SC

550

northward progress of EASM is associated with increased precipitation and more efficient wet scavenging, which result in decrease of the surface particulate matter (PM) concentration.

563

564 565

Fig. 6.

The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China during (a) Apr 20 to May 15 (SMF0), (b) the first quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front

-27-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 566

(SMF1, May 16 to June 10), and (c) the second quiescent stage of the

567

summer monsoon front (SMF2, June 16 to July 5) in 2014. The black box

568

indicates NCP.

Fig. 7.

Difference of the surface PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3) in 142 Chinese cities

RI PT

569

(a) between the first quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front (SMF1,

571

May 16 to June 10) and Apr 20 to May 15 (SMF0); (b) between the second

572

quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front (SMF2, June 16 to July 5) and

573

SMF1. The magenta box indicates NCP. (c) and (d), same as (a) and (b) but

574

for the difference of NCEP RH at 1000 hPa level during 2000 – 2013, black

575

line illustrates the zero line of ∆RH, white box indicates NCP, values over

576

topography higher than 1500m (mostly the Tibetan Plateau) are masked out.

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

SC

570

-28-

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 80°E

100°E

120°E

(a) 50°N 0.9 0.82 0.74

40°N

0.66 0.58 0.5

RI PT

0.42 0.34

30°N

0.26 0.18

20°N

80°E

100°E

120°E

M AN U

50°N

SC

0.1

40°N

30°N

(b) 0.9 0.82 0.74 0.66 0.58 0.5 0.42 0.34 0.26

AC C

EP

20°N

TE D

0.18 0.1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

(a)

1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4

RI PT

MODIS AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)

1.1

0.3

(b)

SC

1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8

M AN U

AERONET AOD at Beijing (unitless)

Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 1.6

0.6 0.4 0.2

0.0 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12

127

110

250

119

123

113

120

3

PM10 concentration (g/m )

(c)

TE D

300

200

101

EP

150

118

AC C

100

50

94.4

0 Jan-05

88.5

Jan-06

81.5

Jan-07

89.0

Jan-08

93.2

Jan-09

85.8

Jan-10

81.5

Jan-11

81.6

Jan-12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (a) 6

(b)

Altitude (km)

5 4

Jun Day Jun Night

3

Dec Day Dec Night Jun Day

2 Jun Night

1

RI PT

Dec Day

Dec Night 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 -1 Mean extinction coefficient at 532 nm (km )

–1100 –700 –350

50

450

800

1200 1550 1950 2350 2700 3100

ΔRH (%)

(c)

SC

ΔBLH (km)

Jun

60 50 40

M AN U

20

P (hPa)

30

(d)

10

0

– 10 – 20 – 30

Dec

– 40

7.5 m/s

JUN

RH (%)

(f)

JUN DEC RH (%)

BLH (meter)

TE D

(e)

1000 hPa

EP

DEC

MAR

MAY

AC C

JAN

JUL

SEP

NOV

925 hPa 850 hPa JAN

MAR

MAY

JUL

SEP

NOV

0.8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1.0

(a)

0.9

0.9

2

(d)

R = 0.90, R = 0.81, P < 0.0001, n = 12

AOD at 550 nm (unitless)

0.7 0.6 0.5

0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4

0.4 0.3 Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

0.3 160

Dec

180

200

RI PT

AOD at 550 nm (unitless)

0.8

0.8

220

240

260

280

300

3

PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)

(b)

0.9

2

R = 0.86, R = 0.74, P < 0.0005, n = 12

0.8

200

PM10, BLH and f(rh) product

150

PM2.5, BLH and f(rh) prodcut

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

SC

AOD at 550 nm (unitless)

250

100 Jan

(e)

M AN U

3

PM, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)

300

0.3 140

Dec

160

180

200

220

240

260

3

PM2.5, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)

1.6

300

1.4

250

1.2

150 100 50

1.0

1.2

TE D

200

1.4

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

(f)

2

R = 0.73, R = 0.53, P < 0.0001, n = 103

1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

0.0 100

150

200

250

300

350

3

PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)

EP

0 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12

AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)

(C)

MODIS AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)

350

1.8

AOD

PM10*BLH*f(rh)

AC C

3

PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)

400

-33-

Fig. 4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

SMF4

SMF2

SMF1

RI PT

SMF3

SC

(a)





→ → →

II. Further northward progress of EASM significant RH increase and more intensive precipitation more efficient wet scavenging decrease of surface PM concentration.

TE D





AC C

EP



(b)

M AN U

I. Early stage of EASM moisture transported northward Converging with the precursor gases of aerosol over ECN initial increase of RH more efficient photochemical activity enhanced formation of the secondary aerosol.

Precursor gases of aerosol

Moisture associated with EASM

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

SC

RI PT

(a)

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

(b)

(c)

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 80°E

100°E

120°E

(a) SMF1 – SMF0 May 16 to June 10 – Apr 20 to May 15

50°N

(c) SMF1 – SMF0 May 16 to June 10 – Apr 20 to May 15

# S S# # S

S # S# # S

30°N

20°N

80°E

100°E (b) SMF2 – SMF1 June 16 to July 5 – May 16 to June

40°N

S # S# # S # S S # S # S S# # S# S# S # S # # S S # # S SS # S# S# S# S# # S # S # S# # S # S S # S # S # S # # S # # S # # S # S # SS # S # S# # S S S S# S# S # S SS# # S# S # # S# S S# # SS # S# S# # S# S# # S # S S# S# # S S# S S# # S S# # Diff_PM2.5 S# S # S# # S S # S # S# # S S # S # S# # S # S # S # S S# concentration S # S # SS # S# # S # S S # S # S# # S S# # (μg/m3) S # S# S # S # S # 45 to 280 S # S # S # 30 to 45 S S # S# # S S# S # S # S # # 15 to 30 S # # S S # S # S # S # S # S # 0 to 15 S # S# # S# S S# # S S# – 15 to 0 S # S # S# # S – 30 to – 15 S # – 45 to – 30 S # – 230 to – 45

–10

–8

–6

–4

–2

0

2

ΔRH (%)

4

6

8

10

6

8

10

(d) SMF2 – SMF1 June 16 to July 5 – May 16 to June

20°N

AC C

EP

S #

# S S# # S

(μg/m3) 45 to 280 30 to 45 15 to 30 0 to 15 – 15 to 0 – 30 to – 15 – 45 to – 30 – 230 to – 45

TE D

50°N

30°N

120°E

Diff_PM2.5 concentration

SC

40°N

M AN U

# S S # S SS# # S# S # S# S # # S # S S# S# # S # S # S # S # S # S# # S # S SS# # S S # S # # S # # S # S# # S# S # S# # S S S S# S# S # S SS# # S# S # # S# S S# # SS # S# S# # S # S # S S# # S# # S S# S S# # S S# # S# S # S# # S S # S# # S # S S # S # S# # S # S # S # # SS S # S # S# # S # S # S # S S # S# S # S S# S # # S # S # S # S # S # S # S S # S# # S S# S # S # # S # S # S # S # S # S # SS S# # S# S # S # S # S# S# # S # S S# # S# # S S # S #

RI PT

S #

–10

–8

–6

–4

–2

0

2

ΔRH (%)

4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights:

The AOD seasonality is distinct over NCP (maximum in June and minimum in

RI PT

December).  BLH, RH collaborate with PM concentration can well explain monthly AOD

variation.

SC

 June AOD increase over NCP relates to prevailing of the East Asia summer

AC C

EP

TE D

M AN U

monsoon.