Accepted Manuscript Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain Wenjun Qu, Jun Wang, Xiaoye Zhang, Lifang Sheng, Wencai Wang PII:
S1352-2310(15)30568-9
DOI:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.061
Reference:
AEA 14313
To appear in:
Atmospheric Environment
Received Date: 13 July 2015 Revised Date:
26 November 2015
Accepted Date: 28 November 2015
Please cite this article as: Qu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Sheng, L., Wang, W., Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain, Atmospheric Environment (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.061. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Opposite seasonality of the aerosol optical depth and the surface
2
particulate matter concentration over the North China Plain
RI PT
1
1
4
SC
Wenjun Qu1, Jun Wang2, Xiaoye Zhang3, Lifang Sheng1, Wencai Wang1
3
Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Key Laboratory of Ocean-Atmosphere
Interaction and Climate in Universities of Shandong, Ocean University of China,
6
Qingdao 266100, China
2
7
TE D
Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration,
EP
3
Beijing 100081, China
AC C
10
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340, USA
8
9
M AN U
5
11
Revision submitted to Atmospheric Environment, November 26, 2015
12 13 14 15
*Corresponding to Wenjun Qu, Physical Oceanography Laboratory, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China. Tel.: +86-532-66781309; fax: +86-532-66782790. e-mail:
[email protected],
[email protected]
-1-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Abstract: Great difference exists in the aerosol optical depth (AOD) between summer
17
and winter over the North China Plain (NCP). Monthly mean AOD at 550 nm derived
18
from the MODIS (MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) products during
19
2000 to 2014 over the area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E exhibits an annual maximum
20
in June (0.855 ± 0.130) and a minimum in December (0.381 ± 0.032). This
21
seasonality of AOD is in the opposite phase with the surface particulate matter (PM)
22
concentration (higher in winter and lower in summer). The possible causes for the
23
higher AOD in June (compared with December) include (a) a higher boundary layer
24
height (BLH) that results in more efficient transport and mixing of aerosol particles to
25
a higher altitude (corresponding to a lower particle concentration near surface) as
26
revealed by the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations
27
profile, (b) a higher relative humidity (RH) due to the inshore monsoon circulation
28
that leads to enhancement of aerosol extinction, (c) emission from the regional open
29
stalk burning in the summer harvest season (as seen from MODIS fire products), and
30
(d) the typical eastward open topographical basin over NCP. Under the assumption
31
that the aerosol and water vapor are well mixed within the boundary layer, analysis on
32
multi-year average shows that the differences in BLH, RH and surface PM
33
concentration can explain up to 81% of the variance of monthly averaged AOD over
34
NCP. A preliminarily hypothesis is also suggested to interpret the shift of AOD
35
pattern from winter to summer with an abrupt increase of AOD from May to June, as
36
well as an increase of surface PM2.5 concentration over NCP during the early phase of
37
northward progress of the East Asia summer monsoon front.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
16
-2-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Keywords: Aerosol optical depth; Seasonality; Boundary layer height; North
39
China Plain
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
38
-3-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 40
1. Introduction Satellite measurement has been applied to air quality monitoring worldwide
42
including the North China Plain (NCP, Li et al, 2003); although a good relationship
43
has been established between the MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
44
(MODIS) aerosol optical depth (AOD) and surface PM2.5 (particulate matter (PM)
45
with diameter ≤ 2.5 µm) concentration in eastern and Midwestern USA (Engel-Cox et
46
al., 2004) and Alabama (Wang and Christopher, 2003), correlation between AOD and
47
surface PM2.5 is quite poor in western USA (Engel-Cox et al., 2004). A critical review
48
by Hoff and Christopher (2009) concluded that the derivation of surface PM2.5 from
49
satellite measurement of AOD (with a precision of ±20%) has an uncertainty of ±30%
50
(or larger), AOD should combine with ground-based measurement and model to
51
improve PM estimation from space.
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
41
Li et al. (2003) validated the MODIS aerosol products and identified three high
53
AOD areas in eastern China (ECN). In north China, a discrepancy in the seasonal
54
variations of AOD and surface particle concentration has been identified, which was
55
partly attributed to the variation of atmospheric mixing layer height (Xia et al., 2006).
56
Wang et al. (2012) reported the contrasting trends between PM10 and the aerosol
57
optical extinction in China, USA, Canada and Europe from 1992 to 2011, and
58
emphasized contribution from the increased fraction of anthropogenic aerosol
59
emission (mostly fine particle). Besides the vertical profile and size distribution of the
60
aerosol, are there any other factors also contribute to the seasonal variation of AOD in
61
north China?
AC C
EP
52
-4-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT While the wintertime air pollution (as well as haze and fog) is recognized as a
63
major concern in ECN (Yang et al., 2013a; Zhao et al., 2013; Boynard et al., 2014),
64
past studies also investigated the increasing trend of summertime air quality
65
deterioration in the region from both the meteorology (Qu et al., 2013) and the
66
emission (Li et al., 2010) perspectives. An overall comparatively better surface air
67
quality in summer (than in winter) over ECN can be easily understood because of the
68
greater boundary layer height (BLH) which is more favorable for dilution and
69
diffusion of the pollutants as well as the more intensive precipitation which is more
70
favorable for wet scavenging of the particle. For example, the surface fine particle
71
concentration in Wuhan, China was found to be mainly depends on variation in the
72
convective BLH (Kong and Yi, 2015). However, it is interesting that the better air
73
quality and lower PM concentration near surface in summer is in contrast with the
74
higher summertime AOD (will be discussed in section 3) over NCP (generally the
75
area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E, Fig. 1). This study will examine the factors
76
contributing to the higher AOD in June (compared with the lower AOD in December)
77
over NCP.
78
2. Data
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
79
RI PT
62
The data used in this study include MODIS Terra AOD products (1×1 degree grid)
80
from
March
2000
to
December
81
(http://giovanni.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni/) and the GOCART (Goddard Chemistry
82
Aerosol Radiation and Transport, Mian et al., 2002) modeled CODs (column optical
-5-
2014
from
Giovanni
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 83
depth) for different aerosol components in 2000 – 2007 (formerly distributed by
84
Giovanni, accessed by July 2015), as well as the AERONET AOD data at Beijing
85
(116.381°
86
(http://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/webtool_opera_v2_new). The aerosol extinction
87
coefficient at 532 nm derived from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder
88
Satellite
89
(https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/calipso/cal_lid_l3_apro_allsky-beta-v1-30_table)
90
is used to reflect vertical distribution of the aerosol. Relative humidity (RH) and wind
91
(2.5×2.5 degree grid) from NCEP (United States National Centers for Environmental
92
Prediction)
93
(http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis.html)
94
(0.125×0.125 degree grid) from ECMWF (European Center for Medium-Range
95
Weather Forecasts) reanalysis data (http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/) are also used to
96
make comparison of meteorology between summer and winter.
39.977°
E)
March
(CALIPSO)
2001
level
3
to
October
2013
allsky
product
M AN U
SC
Observations
from
RI PT
N,
reanalysis
data BLH
TE D
and
In addition, the available PM10 (particles with diameter ≤ 10 µm) concentration in
98
34 major Chinese cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012 is derived from the air pollution
99
index
AC C
EP
97
from
the
Ministry of
Environment
Protection
of
China
(MEPC,
100
http://datacenter.mep.gov.cn/) using the method in Qu et al. (2010). Similarly, the
101
available PM2.5 concentration in 142 Chinese cities in 2014 is also derived from the
102
air quality index from MEPC. These data are used to reflect the seasonal variation of
103
surface PM concentration over NCP.
104
Moreover, the surface visibility (Vis), wind speed and RH extracted from the
-6-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Global Summary of Day (GSOD) database (ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/gsod) for
106
354 stations in China are used to assess impact of the northward progress of East Asia
107
summer monsoon. Detail of these data is described in Qu et al. (2013, 2015b).
108
3. Contrast between AOD and surface PM seasonality over NCP
RI PT
105
The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China during 2000 to 2014
110
demonstrates that the AOD seasonal contrast is most distinct over NCP; AOD in June
111
is generally larger than 0.6 (> 0.9 over most of the area, Fig. 1a) and AOD in
112
December generally ranges from 0.36 to 0.6 over NCP (Fig. 1b, also see
113
supplementary material 1 for the yearly comparison), which reflects the greatest
114
seasonal difference of monthly AOD in China. NCP is also the major high AOD area
115
in China; the AOD hotspot area over NCP is generally constrained within the NCP
116
topographical basin (supplementary material 1), which is expected because the basin
117
is always most densely populated with intensive anthropogenic emission, consistent
118
with Li et al. (2003) that human activities are the main source of aerosols in ECN. In
119
addition, the obvious interannual variation in spatial coverage of the higher AOD area
120
over ECN (supplementary material 1) is beyond the scope of this study.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
121
SC
109
Fig. 2 shows the time series of AOD and surface PM concentration. The monthly
122
averaged MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over NCP during 2000 to 2014 obviously
123
illustrates an annual maximum in June (0.855 ± 0.130, Fig. 2a) and a minimum in
124
December (0.381 ± 0.032). The AERONET monthly averaged AOD at Beijing (Fig.
125
2b) generally shows a synchronous variation with the MODIS AOD over NCP, and
-7-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 126
significant correlations (R = 0.72 – 0.75, P < 0.0001 significance, n = 135) exist
127
between the monthly averaged AERONET AODs at 440 nm, 675 nm, 870 nm and
128
1020 nm at Beijing with the monthly averaged MODIS AOD over NCP. Fig. 2c shows monthly surface PM10 mass concentration in 34 major Chinese
130
cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012. In discrepancy with the higher AOD in June
131
(compared with the lower AOD in December), the surface PM10 concentration in June
132
is generally lower than that in December; similarly, the PM2.5 concentration varies in
133
a same way as PM10 (supplementary material 2). It must be noted here that the
134
MODIS AOD is an ambient measurement, but the surface PM measurement is
135
generally made by using of the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance analyzers
136
(TEOMs, model 1400a, Rupprecht & Patashnick, USA) at an elevated temperature
137
(50 °C), thus suffers loss of materials such as the semi-volatile and hygroscopic
138
species (see detail in Qu et al., 2010). A discussion of the possible causes resulting in
139
such contrast between the phase of monthly variation of AOD and PM will follow.
140
4. Possible causes of the AOD seasonality over NCP
141
4.1. Emission
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
142
RI PT
129
Over ECN, the presumably intensive and continuous anthropogenic emission (of
143
the aerosol and its precursor gases) due to house heating is believed to be an important
144
additional source in winter. Such an intensive anthropogenic emission in winter is
145
supported by the high wintertime black carbon and brown carbon concentration
146
reported in Beijing during 2002 to 2013 (Li et al., 2015). Meanwhile, the higher
-8-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 147
mineral dust concentration in Beijing in spring (Li et al., 2015) is consistent with the
148
more intensive springtime dust emission.
149
On the other hand, an inspection of global fire maps from the National Aeronautics
151
(http://www.earthobservatory.nasa.gov/GlobalMaps/view.php?d1=MOD14A1_M_FI
152
RE#) shows clear fire points from Shandong Peninsula to the north of Yangtze River
153
in ECN (the major NCP area) in June every year, suggesting potential additional
154
emission sources favorable for high AOD over this area in June. Such an additional
155
June emission is most probably associated with the regional intensive open stalk
156
burning in the summer harvest season. Individual particle study did identify evidence
157
of the contribution from regional agricultural biomass burning to high AOD in Beijing
158
and north China in June 2007 (Li et al., 2010). This regional open, out-of-order and
159
uncontrolled stalk burning is a major emission source over NCP in the summer
160
harvest season. For example, the agricultural biomass burning has been found to be
161
associated with the AOD peak value in June over ECN (Yang et al., 2013b).
162
Observation of a clearly increased black carbon concentration in June (comparable
163
with those in December, January and February) at Beijing (Li et al., 2015) also
164
supports this point.
Space
Administration
earth
observatory
system
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
165
and
RI PT
150
In addition to emission, BLH (associated with vertical distribution of the aerosol)
166
and meteorology (including wind and RH) are the other important factors influencing
167
AOD and PM concentration and will be discussed next.
168
4.2. BLH and vertical extinction profile
-9-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ∆BLH, defined as the difference of BLH at 14:00 local time (derived from
170
ECMWF model, see section 2) between June and December during 2000 – 2013,
171
shows that BLH in June is generally greater than BLH in December by at least 350
172
meter over the AOD hotspots area from Shandong Peninsula to the north of Yangtze
173
River in ECN (i.e., NCP, Fig. 3a); the higher BLH could result in more efficient
174
transport and mixing of particles to a higher altitude (layer), leading to an increase of
175
column AOD in June (compared to December) but possibly a decrease of surface PM
176
concentration, consistent with Kong and Yi (2015).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
169
A comparison of the CALIPSO extinction profiles between June and December in
178
2014 over NCP (Fig. 3b) does illustrate a higher extinction coefficient in June at a
179
higher altitude, especially above ~600 meter where both the day and night extinction
180
coefficients in June are much higher than those in December. The higher extinction
181
coefficient above ~600 meter in the vertical profile in June (compared with that in
182
December) is consistent with the higher BLH (favorable for more efficient transport
183
and mixing of particles to a higher altitude) as well as the higher column integrated
184
AOD. The peak extinction coefficient layers located aloft in the June profiles (relative
185
to the December profiles) and the significant difference in extinction coefficient
186
between higher altitude and near surface in Fig. 3b can interpret the higher AOD and
187
lower surface PM concentration in June.
AC C
EP
TE D
177
188
Fig. 3e shows the monthly average BLH over the area of 30–40° N and 110–120°
189
E during 2000 – 2013. As BLH is much different between land and ocean (Fig. 3a),
190
120° E is chosen as the east boundary to plot the monthly BLH time series over the
-10-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT major land area within the study area. A comparably higher BLH is found in June
192
(only slightly lower than that in May and April), consistent with the higher AOD then.
193
On the contrary, a lower BLH in December (Fig. 3e) is consistent with the lowest
194
AOD over NCP in December (Fig. 2a and 2b).
195
4.3. Other meteorological and topographical factors
RI PT
191
NCP is an eastward open topographical basin surrounded by the Yanshan
197
Mountains to the north, by the Taihang Mountains and the Qinling Mountains to the
198
west, and by the Daba Mountains and the Dabie Mountains to the south (see
199
supplementary material 1). The difference of wind vector between June and December
200
illustrates a prevailing inshore (southeast and south) wind in June (Fig. 3c), which
201
favors accumulation of the pollutants (originated from the intensive anthropogenic
202
emission in this densely populated region) within the topographical basin of NCP and
203
influx of the moisture from the ocean. Correspondingly, the RH profile (Fig. 3d) as
204
well as the difference of RH between June and December at 850 hPa level (Fig. 3c)
205
demonstrates a higher RH in June from 1000 hPa to 300 hPa levels over the AOD
206
hotspots area of NCP. Meanwhile, a significant increase of RH from May to June is
207
obvious at 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels over the area of 30–40° N and
208
110–120° E (Fig. 3f). Here the 850 hPa pressure level, which is comparable to ~1900
209
meter of the average BLH in June (Fig. 3e), is chosen to reflect RH at the upper level
210
of the boundary layer (BL). Such an increase of RH in June at different levels is
211
favorable for enhancement in new particle speciation (NPS) and secondary aerosol
212
formation (such as sulfate and organic aerosol, Sun et al., 2013) as well as in
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
196
-11-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 213
hygroscopic growth of the aerosol (Qu et al., 2015a); all these processes can
214
subsequently result in enhanced aerosol extinction as well as increase of the column
215
AOD and impairment of visibility (Vis). Indeed, increase of AOD is found to be associated with increase of the total
217
column water vapor content (CWV, Smirnov et al., 2002; Eck et al., 2008). Bi et al.
218
(2014) identified a strong positive correlation between AOD and CWV at Beijing in
219
January 2013. Aerosol water content was found to contribute significantly to the light
220
extinction under Asian continental outflow (Jung and Kim, 2011), and its effect on
221
light extinction and Vis impairment is mainly due to increases of the (NH4)2SO4 and
222
NH4NO3 concentration (Jung et al., 2009).
M AN U
SC
RI PT
216
Along this line, a comparison of the GOCART (Mian et al., 2002) modeled CODs
224
(column optical depth) of the aerosol components in 2000 – 2007 shows that sulfate
225
has the greatest COD difference between June and December (supplementary material
226
3). The higher sulfate COD over NCP in June is consistent with the initial significant
227
increase of RH from May to June (Fig. 3f), which confirms that increase of RH and
228
enhancement of hygroscopic growth of sulfate (a major aerosol component)
229
contribute crucially to the maximal AOD in June over NCP. Moreover, the high
230
sulfate COD center (> 0.1, shaded with blue to yellow) spans all over ECN in June but
231
only limits within the more south part of ECN in December, consistent with the
232
general spatial and temporal distribution of higher RH. Similarly, the high BC area
233
also limits within the south part of ECN in December and shows a broadly northward
234
extension in June, but with a weaker summer vs. winter contrast compared with
AC C
EP
TE D
223
-12-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 235
sulfate (figures not shown). The June vs. December difference of CODs for other
236
aerosol components is unobvious and not considered.
237
Furthermore, according to the IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual
Environments)
reconstruction
method
239
(http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/ReconBext/reconBext.htm) for aerosol
240
scattering (which is a major component of aerosol extinction), the scattering
241
coefficient (Bscat) can be calculated using the following formula,
SC
RI PT
238
Bscat (Mm-1) = 3fT(rh)[Sulfate] + 3 fT(rh) [Nitrate] + 4 forg(rh) [OMC]
M AN U
242
+ 1 [Soil] + 0.6 [CM]
243
(1)
where [Sulfate] and [Nitrate] are mass concentrations calculated based on the forms of
245
(NH4)2SO4 and NH4NO3, [OMC] is the organic mass by carbon, [Soil] is the mass of
246
fine dust aerosol and [CM] is the coarse mass; while fT(rh) and forg(rh) are the relative
247
humidity correction factors for converting dry scattering coefficient to ambient value.
248
Three times of fT(rh) and four times of forg(rh) in formula (1) demonstrate that
249
scattering of aerosol components such as sulfate, nitrate and organic matter can be
250
strongly enhanced when RH increases, which supports the conjecture above that the
251
higher RH and higher sulfate contribution to the aerosol profile over NCP in June are
252
associated with an increase of AOD due to enhancement of the aerosol extinction
253
efficiency.
AC C
EP
TE D
244
254
In summary, the comparably higher BLH in June (Fig. 3e) is favorable for more
255
efficient transport and mixing of particles to a higher elevation, which results in a
256
higher AOD but a smaller surface PM concentration. On the contrary, in December
-13-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT the lower BLH (Fig. 3e) is associated with accumulation of the particles near surface
258
but a lower extinction coefficient in the vertical profile (Fig. 3b) and subsequently a
259
lower AOD. Moreover, accumulation of the pollutants within the eastward open
260
topographical basin of NCP and influx of the moisture (as well as increase of RH)
261
accompanied with the prevailing inshore wind in June (Fig. 3c) are also favorable for
262
the enhancement of aerosol extinction and for the higher AOD over NCP. An
263
integration of these factors is followed in section 5.
264
5. A simple model to reconcile AOD and PM seasonality
M AN U
SC
RI PT
257
AOD is in proportion to the product of PM concentration, the shape of aerosol
266
extinction profile (H) and RH correction factors (f(rh)) (Kessner et al., 2013). Here
267
the PM10 concentration during 2005–2012 and PM2.5 concentration during 2014 in 34
268
major Chinese cities within NCP are used to calculate the monthly PM concentration.
269
The monthly averaged BLH over NCP during 2005–2012 is used to reflect variation
270
of H. RH at the 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels are used to calculate the
271
monthly averaged RH within BL, which is subsequently used to determine f(rh) value
272
(http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Tools/humidity_correction.htm). Note BLH at
273
14:00 local time is used, while RH and PM are derived from daily averages; these
274
measurements are not coincident in time with the MODIS satellite overpass. Although
275
monthly averages are compared here, disagreement is expected due to difference in
276
the temporal coverage of measurements. Assuming the aerosol and water vapor are
277
well mixed within BL, the PM concentration, f(rh) and BLH is used to establish a
AC C
EP
TE D
265
-14-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 278
simple model, and PM*BLH*f(rh) can thus reflect the variation of AOD due to
279
aerosol extinction in BL, which is subsequently compared with the monthly averaged
280
MODIS AOD over NCP. There is generally a synchronous variation between the multi-year averaged
282
monthly PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD over NCP (with a June maximum and a December
283
minimum, Fig. 4a and 4b); moreover, significant correlations also exist between
284
PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD (R2 = 0.81 and 0.74 for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively, P <
285
0.0005, n = 12, Fig. 4d and 4e). Although individually PM, BLH and f(rh) can not
286
well explain the AOD variation, BLH in collaboration with the surface PM
287
concentration (PM) and the RH correction factor (f(rh)) can explain about 81% or
288
74% of the variance of monthly averaged AOD over NCP. Consequently, the simple
289
model supports our discussion in section 4 that the large values of BLH, RH and the
290
corresponding emission and PM concentration are major possible causes of the
291
maximal AOD in June over NCP. Note here only the available surface PM
292
concentration is used in the comparison between PM*BLH*f(rh) and AOD.
SC
M AN U
TE D
EP
Moreover, analysis on individual cities in the specific months identifies
AC C
293
RI PT
281
294
significant (P < 0.0001 significance level) correlation (R2 = 0.12 – 0.41, n = 103 – 151)
295
between PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD for 22 of the 34 cities over NCP (for more detail
296
see supplementary material 4); the unmatched AOD, BLH and RH (extracted from 1.0,
297
0.125 and 2.5 degree grid data) and PM10 concentration (measured at a specific
298
location) is an expected source of error, and averaging over space and time could
299
result in better agreement between PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD (discussed above).
-15-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Indeed, the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh) and AOD over NCP during 2004
301
– 2012 varied synchronously (Fig. 4c), and a stronger correlation (R2 = 0.53, P <
302
0.0001 significance, n = 103, Fig. 4f) is found between them.
303
6. Preliminary hypothesis about impact of EASM front
RI PT
300
It is well known that the shift of the winter and summer monsoon is a major
305
characteristic of weather and climate over East Asia. Climatologically, the phasic
306
northward progress of the summer monsoon front (SMF) experiences three times
307
abrupt advance and four quiescent stages. SMF is located at the north part of south
308
China during its first quiescent stage (May 16 to June 10, SMF1, Fig 5a), and then
309
marches to the Yangtze River Basin, the Yellow River and Huai River Basin, and
310
north China during its second (June 16 to July 5, SMF2), third (July 6 to July 20,
311
SMF3) and fourth (July 21 to August 10, SMF4) quiescent stages, respectively (Wu et
312
al., 2002). To facilitate the discussion, SMF0 (Apr 20 to May 15), a period with the
313
same duration of but before SMF1, is defined to supply a background before the East
314
Asia summer monsoon (EASM) developing.
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
315
SC
304
Monthly variation shows an abrupt increase of AOD over NCP from May to June
316
(Fig. 4a). More specifically, there is an obvious AOD increase over NCP from SMF0
317
(Fig. 6a) to SMF1 (Fig. 6b); meanwhile, the higher AOD (> 0.9, shaded with red) area
318
over ECN experiences a further northward displacement from SMF1 (Fig. 6b) to
319
SMF2 (Fig. 6c). Correspondingly, the PM10 concentration exhibits a comparably
320
higher value from December to May (Fig. 2c, associated with additional emission
-16-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT from house heating in winter and contribution from dust in spring), followed by June
322
with the highest PM10 concentration in summer (June, July and August). Similar
323
variation for the one-year record of monthly PM2.5 concentration in 2014
324
(supplementary material 2) also indicated the highest June PM concentration in
325
summer. More in detail, the difference between SMF1 and SMF0 shows a significant
326
increase of PM2.5 concentration over the major south part of ECN (Fig. 7a), which is
327
consistent with the increase of multi-year averaged RH from SMF0 to SMF1 in this
328
region (Fig. 7c). A comparison of the spatial distribution of PM2.5 and RH differences
329
shows that the area with a slight and initial RH increase (0 to 2%, shaded with green
330
in Fig. 7c) seems like the area with a greater PM2.5 increase (generally > 15 µg m–3,
331
Fig. 7a). These AOD and PM variations could be interpreted by a preliminary
332
hypothesis of the possibly enhanced formation of the secondary aerosol (SOA)
333
accompanied with the northward progress of EASM (as conceptually illustrated in Fig.
334
5b).
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
321
The spatial displacement of SMF associated with EASM development can result
336
in changes in the converging of precursor gases (of aerosol) with moisture introduced
337
by EASM into the region. The key point here is that during the drier period before
338
EASM prevailing (i.e., the winter and spring associated with presumably more
339
intensive anthropogenic emission), although the aerosol precursor gases is abundant in
340
the atmosphere, the water vapor is presumably in deficit over ECN and serves as an
341
important rate control condition for SOA formation. In this context, northward
342
introduction of the water vapor into ECN and increase of RH during the early phase of
AC C
EP
335
-17-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT EASM development is crucial to SOA formation. When converging and mixing of the
344
precursor gases of aerosol with the moisture from south occur, ECN becomes a good
345
place with more efficient photochemical activity, leading to enhancement of NPS,
346
SOA formation and hygroscopic growth. Indeed, the NPS events in urban Beijing
347
were usually associated with changes in wind directions (Zhang et al., 2011),
348
implying that mixing of the precursor gases with moisture (occurred during
349
converging of different air masses) is favorable for photochemical activities and NPS,
350
which supports our hypothesis above. Such an enhanced SOA formation can
351
potentially influence AOD and PM concentration. Here, PM2.5 concentration is used to
352
evaluate the PM variation associated with SOA formation because SOA should be
353
within the size range of fine particle.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
343
On the other hand, for the area of Guangdong Province (the most south of ECN,
355
nearby Hainan Island) with a significant RH increase from SMF0 to SMF1 (2% to 8%,
356
shaded with yellow to orange in Fig. 7c), the PM2.5 concentration decreases (Fig. 7a),
357
probably due to more efficient wet scavenging when RH increases further. This is
358
confirmed by the shift from SMF1 to SMF2, accompanying with a general significant
359
increase of RH (> 10%, Fig. 7d) and a decrease of PM2.5 concentration (Fig. 7b) over
360
the major area of ECN.
EP
AC C
361
TE D
354
Moreover, variation of Vis accompanied with the northward progress of EASM
362
also supports our hypothesis. As Vis shows an interannual decreasing trend over ECN
363
(Qu et al., 2013, 2015b), here the normalized Vis is calculated based on each station
364
during May 16 to August 10 (i.e., the period spans over the four quiescent stages of
-18-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT SMF) each year to assess the phasic variation of Vis due to the northward progress of
366
SMF. Our analysis finds that the south part of ECN experiences a Vis improvement
367
accompanied with the northward progress of SMF, while NCP (30–40° N and
368
110–125° E) experiences a Vis degradation during the same course (supplementary
369
material 5); the increase of RH and the decrease of surface wind speed
370
(supplementary material 6, here wind speed is also normalized using the same method
371
for Vis) might be possible causes favorable for enhancement of NPS and SOA
372
formation as well as Vis degradation over NCP accompanied with the northward
373
progress of SMF.
M AN U
SC
RI PT
365
Based on these analyses, we can hypothesize the impact of EASM front on a
375
possible enhancement of SOA formation, which contributes to the significant increase
376
of PM2.5 concentration and the corresponding increase of AOD from SMF0 to SMF1
377
over NCP.
378
7. Conclusion
EP
TE D
374
In contrast to the lower surface PM concentration in summer, AOD shows an
380
obvious increase in summer (June) compared with winter (December) over NCP.
381
Several factors work in concert to result in this opposite seasonality of AOD and
382
surface PM.
AC C
379
383
(i) Increase of BLH, associated with more efficient transport and mixing of
384
particles to a higher altitude, results in a higher extinction coefficient near
385
and above the top of BLH and therefore, a higher AOD but a decrease of
-19-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 386
surface PM concentration over NCP in June. (ii) Converging and mixing of the precursor gases of aerosol with the
388
moisture introduced by EASM, which subsequently results in an increase
389
of RH and enhancement of NPS, SOA formation and hygroscopic growth
390
(especially for sulfate as a major aerosol component).
392
(iii) Emission from regional open stalk burning in the summer harvest season.
SC
391
RI PT
387
(iv) The typical southeast and south wind and the mountains to the north and
394
west (generally ≥ 1500 meter above sea level) resulting in accumulation
395
and restriction of pollutants within the NCP topographical "basin".
M AN U
393
BLH, RH in collaboration with PM concentration can well explain the multi-year
397
averaged monthly variation of AOD. These factors need to be considered when
398
investigating the climate effect of aerosol in the region.
TE D
396
The increase of AOD and PM concentration over NCP in early summer can be
400
attributed to possible enhanced new particle speciation and SOA formation during the
401
early phase of EASM (section 6). The presumably intensive solar radiation, high RH
402
and high temperature over ECN in summer are all favorable for the enhancement of
403
photochemical activity and SOA formation. However, the suggested hypothesis
404
should be further investigated. Observation and study on the contribution of SOA to
405
the total aerosol, on the possibly seasonal variation of aerosol components, as well as
406
on influx and impact of the ocean originated materials (such as sea salt,
407
dimethylsulfide (Ma et. al., 2005), etc.) accompanied with EASM should be helpful to
AC C
EP
399
-20-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT improve our understanding in the future. Clarifying the variation of AOD and PM
409
accompanied with the establishing and prevailing of EASM is potentially helpful to
410
study the feedback and interaction between the increased aerosol loading and the
411
variation of monsoon intensity in the region.
412
Acknowledgments:
SC
TE D
M AN U
Education’s 111 Project (B07036).
EP
414
This research is supported by NSFC 41276009 and Chinese Ministry of
AC C
413
RI PT
408
-21-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 415
References Bi, J.R., Huang, J.P., Hu, Z.Y., Holben, B.N., Guo, Z.Q., 2014. Investigate the aerosol optical and radiative characteristics of heavy haze episodes in Beijing during January of 2013. Journal of Geophysical Research, DOI: 10.1002/2014JD021757.
419 420 421 422
Boynard, A., Clerbaux, C., Clarisse, L., Safieddine, S., Pommier, M., Damme, M.V., Bauduin, S., Oudot, C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P.-F., 2014. First simultaneous space measurements of atmospheric pollutants in the boundary layer from IASI: A case study in the North China Plain. Geophysical Research Letters 41, doi:10.1002/2013GL058333.
423 424 425 426 427
Eck, T.F., Holben, B.N., Reid, J.S., Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Giles, D., O’Neill, N.T., Tsay, S.-C., Ji, Q., Mandoos, A.A., Khan, M.R., Reid, E.A., Schafer, J.S., Sorokine, M., Newcomb, W., Slutsker, I., 2008. Spatial and temporal variability of column-integrated aerosol optical properties in the southern Arabian Gulf and United Arab Emirates in summer. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, D01204, doi:10.1029/2007JD008944.
428 429 430
Engel-Cox, J.A., Holloman, C.H., Coutant, B.W., Hoff, R.M., 2004. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of MODIS satellite sensor data for regional and urban scale air quality. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2495–2509.
431 432 433 434 435 436
Hoff, R.M., Christopher, S.A., 2009. Remote sensing of particulate pollution from space: Have we reached the promised land? Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 59, 645–675.Jung, J., Lee, H., Kim, Y.J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Gu, J., Fan, S., 2009. Aerosol chemistry and the effect of aerosol water content on visibility impairment and radiative forcing in Guangzhou during the 2006 Pearl River Delta campaign. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 3231–3244.
437 438 439 440
Jung, J., Kim, Y.J., 2011. Tracking sources of severe haze episodes and their physicochemical and hygroscopic properties under Asian continental outflow: Long-range transport pollution, postharvest biomass burning, and Asian dust. Journal of Geophysical Research 116, D02206, doi:10.1029/2010JD014555.
441 442
Kessner, A.L., Wang, J., Levy, R.C., Colarco, P.R., 2013. Remote sensing of surface visibility from space: A look at the United States East Coast. Atmospheric Environment 81, 136–147.
443 444 445
Kong, W., Yi, F., 2015. Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a location of a central China megacity. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, 7928–7940.
446 447 448
Li, C., Mao, J., Lau, K.A., Chen, J., Yuan, Z., Liu, X., Zhu, A., Liu, G., 2003. Characteristics of distribution and seasonal variation of aerosol optical depth in eastern China with MODIS products. Chinese Science Bulletin 48, 2488–2495.
449 450
Li, W.J., Shao, L.Y., Buseck, P.R., 2010. Haze types in Beijing and the influence of agricultural biomass burning. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 8119–8130.
451 452
Li, Z., Li, L., Zhang, F., Li, D., Xie, Y., Xu, H., 2015. Comparison of aerosol properties over Beijing and Kanpur: Optical, physical properties and aerosol component composition
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
416 417 418
-22-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT retrieved from 12 years ground-based Sun-sky radiometer remote sensing data. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, 1520–1535.
455 456 457
Ma, Q., Hu, M., Zhu, T., Liu, L., Dai, M., 2005. Seawater, atmospheric dimethylsulfide and aerosol ions in the Pearl River Estuary and the adjacent northern South China Sea. Journal of Sea Research 53, 131–145.
458 459 460 461
Mian, C., Paul, G., Stefan, K., Omar, T., Brent, N.H., Bryan, N.D., Randall, V.M., Jennifer, A.L., Akiko, H., Teruyuki, N., 2002. Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements. Journal of the Atmospheric Science, 59, 461–483.
462 463 464
Qu, W.J., Arimoto, R., Zhang, X.Y., Zhao, C.H., Wang, Y.Q., Sheng, L.F., Fu, G., 2010. Spatial distribution and interannual variation of surface PM10 concentrations over eighty-six Chinese cities. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 5641–5662.
465 466 467
Qu, W., Wang, J., Gao, S., Wu, T., 2013. Effect of the strengthened western Pacific subtropical high on summer visibility decrease over eastern China since 1973. Journal of Geophysical Research 118, 7142–7156.
468 469 470
Qu, W.J., Wang, J., Zhang, X.Y., Wang, D., Sheng, L.F., 2015a. Influence of relative humidity on aerosol composition: Impacts on light extinction and visibility impairment at two sites in coastal area of China. Atmospheric Research 153, 500–511.
471 472
Qu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Gao, S., 2015b. Effect of cold wave on winter visibility over eastern China. Journal of Geophysical Research 120, doi:10.1002/2014JD021958.
473 474 475
Smirnov, A., Holben, B.N., Dubovik, O., O'Neill, N.T., Eck, T.F., Westphal, D.L., Goroch, A.K., Pietras, C., Slutsker, I., 2002. Atmospheric aerosol optical properties in the Persian Gulf. Journal of Atmospheric Science 59 (3), 620–634.
476 477 478
Sun, Y.L., Wang, Z.F., Fu, P.Q., Jiang, Q., Yang, T., Li, J., Ge, X.L., 2013. The impact of relative humidity on aerosol composition and evolution processes during wintertime in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment 77, 927–934.
479 480 481
Wang, J., Christopher, S.A., 2003. Intercomparison between satellite-derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: Implications for air quality studies. Geophysical Research Letters 30(21), 2095, doi:10.1029/2003GL018174.
482 483 484
Wang, K.C., Dickinson, R.E., Su, L., Trenberth, K.E., 2012. Contrasting trends of mass and optical properties of aerosols over the Northern Hemisphere from 1992 to 2011. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12, 9387–9398.
485 486
Wu, R.S., 2002. Principles of modern synoptic meteorology (in Chinese), 319 pp., Higher Education Press, Beijing.
487 488 489
Xia, X.A., Chen, H.B., Wang, P.C., Zhang, W.X., Goloub, P., Chatenet, B., Eck, T.F., Holben B.N., 2006. Variation of column-integrated aerosol properties in a Chinese urban region. Journal of Geophysical Research 111, D05204.
490
Yang, K., Dickerson, R.R., Carn, S.A., Ge, C., Wang J., 2013a. First observations of SO2 from the
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
453 454
-23-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT satellite Suomi NPP OMPS: Widespread air pollution events over China. Geophysical Research Letters 40, doi:10.1002/grl.50952.
493 494 495
Yang, Y.J., Fu, Y.F., Wu, B.W., Shi, C.E, Deng, X.L., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., 2013b. Impacts of agricultural fire on aerosol distribution over East China during summer harvest time. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics 8(4), 241–252.
496 497 498
Zhang, Y.M., Zhang, X.Y., Sun, J.Y., Lin, W.L., Gong, S.L., Shen, X.J., Yang, S., 2011. Characterization of new particle and secondary aerosol formation during summertime in Beijing, China. Tellus 63B, 382–394.
499 500 501
Zhao, X.J., Zhao, P.S., Xu, J., Meng, W., Pu, W.W., Dong, F., He, D., Shi, Q.F., 2013. Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13, 5685–5696.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
491 492
-24-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 502
Figure captions:
503
Fig. 1.
The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China in (a) June and (b) December during 2000 to 2014. The AOD contrast is significant over NCP
505
(the area of 30–40° N and 110–125° E, indicated by a black box with the
506
North China Plain as a principal part).
Fig. 2.
(a) MODIS Terra monthly averaged AOD at 550 nm over NCP from January
SC
507
RI PT
504
2005 to December 2012. The red and green arrows indicate AOD in June
509
and December, respectively. (b) AERONET monthly averaged AOD
510
(interpolating using values at 440 nm and 675 nm) at Beijing (116.381° N,
511
39.977° E) from January 2005 to December 2012. The red and green arrows
512
indicate AOD in June and December, respectively. (c) Monthly PM10 mass
513
concentration in 34 major Chinese cities over NCP from 2005 to 2012. The
514
box-and-stem plots depict the minimum, the 1th, 5th, 25th, 50th (median),
515
75th, 95th, 99th percentile and the maximum for the PM10 concentration; the
516
square in the box depicts the arithmetic mean. The geometric mean of the
518 519
520
TE D
EP
AC C
517
M AN U
508
monthly PM10 concentration for the 34 cities in June and December also presented. Those in June and December are shown in red and green, respectively.
Fig. 3.
(a) The difference of average boundary layer height (BLH, meter) at 14:00
521
local time between June and December (∆BLH = BLHJune – BLHDecember)
522
during 2000 – 2013. BLH in June is generally greater than BLH in
-25-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 523
December by at least 350 meter over the AOD hotspots area from Shandong
524
Peninsula to the north of Yangtze River in eastern China. The black box
525
indicates NCP. (b) Vertical profile of the aerosol extinction coefficient at 532
526
nm (km
527
30–40° N and 110–120° E in June and December 2014. (c) The difference of
528
mean wind vector and relative humidity (RH) between June and December
529
(June minus December, ∆RH = RHJune – RHDecember) during 2000 – 2013 at
530
850 hPa (1475 gpm, geopotential height in meters) level, the white line
531
illustrates the zero line of ∆RH (i.e., the mean RH in June is equal to that in
532
December), the black box indicates NCP; the results at surface, 1000 hPa
533
(110 gpm), 925 hPa (762 gpm) and 700 hPa (3012 gpm) levels are similar
534
and not shown. The difference of RH generally shows a higher RH over the
535
AOD hotspots area in June compared with December. (d) The RH profile in
536
June and December over NCP during 2000 – 2013, a higher RH in June is
537
obvious from 1000 hPa to 300 hPa levels. (e) The monthly average BLH
538
over the area of 30–40° N and 110–120° E during 2000 – 2013. (f) same as
540
541
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
RI PT
, derived from CALIPSO level 3 allsky product) over the area of
AC C
539
–1
(e) but for relative humidity (RH, %) at 1000 hPa, 925 hPa and 850 hPa levels.
Fig. 4.
(a) MODIS Terra monthly averaged AOD at 550 nm over NCP during
542
2001–2013. (b) Monthly product of PM concentration, boundary layer height
543
(BLH, at 14:00 local time) and RH correction factors (f(rh)) (PM*BLH*f(rh))
544
over NCP. (c) Time series of the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh)
-26-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT and AOD over NCP during 2004 – 2012. (d) Linear fitting between the
546
monthly averaged AOD and PM10*BLH*f(rh) over NCP. (e) same as (d) but
547
for PM2.5. (f) same as (d) but for the monthly area averaged PM10*BLH*f(rh)
548
and AOD over NCP during 2004 – 2012.
549
Fig. 5.
RI PT
545
(a) Change of the summer monsoon front (SMF) illustrated by the average position of the 850 hPa level pseudoequivalent potential temperature θse =
551
340 K contour during 1971 – 1980 (follow Wu et al., 2002). Here SMF1,
552
SMF2, SMF3 and SMF4 are corresponding to May 16 to June 10, June 16 to
553
July 5, July 6 to July 20 and July 21 to August 10, respectively; the average
554
positions of SMF during these four quiescent stages are demonstrated (detail
555
in section 6 of the main text). (b) A conceptual illustration of the enhanced
556
formation of the secondary aerosol due to northward transport of the
557
moisture (as well as initial increase of relative humidity, RH) and subsequent
558
converging and mixing with the precursor gases of aerosol over eastern
559
China (ECN) during the early stage of the East Asia summer monsoon
560
(EASM), which results in more efficient photochemical activity. Further
562
M AN U
TE D
EP
AC C
561
SC
550
northward progress of EASM is associated with increased precipitation and more efficient wet scavenging, which result in decrease of the surface particulate matter (PM) concentration.
563
564 565
Fig. 6.
The mean MODIS Terra AOD at 550 nm over China during (a) Apr 20 to May 15 (SMF0), (b) the first quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front
-27-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 566
(SMF1, May 16 to June 10), and (c) the second quiescent stage of the
567
summer monsoon front (SMF2, June 16 to July 5) in 2014. The black box
568
indicates NCP.
Fig. 7.
Difference of the surface PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3) in 142 Chinese cities
RI PT
569
(a) between the first quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front (SMF1,
571
May 16 to June 10) and Apr 20 to May 15 (SMF0); (b) between the second
572
quiescent stage of the summer monsoon front (SMF2, June 16 to July 5) and
573
SMF1. The magenta box indicates NCP. (c) and (d), same as (a) and (b) but
574
for the difference of NCEP RH at 1000 hPa level during 2000 – 2013, black
575
line illustrates the zero line of ∆RH, white box indicates NCP, values over
576
topography higher than 1500m (mostly the Tibetan Plateau) are masked out.
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
SC
570
-28-
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 80°E
100°E
120°E
(a) 50°N 0.9 0.82 0.74
40°N
0.66 0.58 0.5
RI PT
0.42 0.34
30°N
0.26 0.18
20°N
80°E
100°E
120°E
M AN U
50°N
SC
0.1
40°N
30°N
(b) 0.9 0.82 0.74 0.66 0.58 0.5 0.42 0.34 0.26
AC C
EP
20°N
TE D
0.18 0.1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(a)
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
RI PT
MODIS AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)
1.1
0.3
(b)
SC
1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8
M AN U
AERONET AOD at Beijing (unitless)
Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 1.6
0.6 0.4 0.2
0.0 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12
127
110
250
119
123
113
120
3
PM10 concentration (g/m )
(c)
TE D
300
200
101
EP
150
118
AC C
100
50
94.4
0 Jan-05
88.5
Jan-06
81.5
Jan-07
89.0
Jan-08
93.2
Jan-09
85.8
Jan-10
81.5
Jan-11
81.6
Jan-12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT (a) 6
(b)
Altitude (km)
5 4
Jun Day Jun Night
3
Dec Day Dec Night Jun Day
2 Jun Night
1
RI PT
Dec Day
Dec Night 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 -1 Mean extinction coefficient at 532 nm (km )
–1100 –700 –350
50
450
800
1200 1550 1950 2350 2700 3100
ΔRH (%)
(c)
SC
ΔBLH (km)
Jun
60 50 40
M AN U
20
P (hPa)
30
(d)
10
0
– 10 – 20 – 30
Dec
– 40
7.5 m/s
JUN
RH (%)
(f)
JUN DEC RH (%)
BLH (meter)
TE D
(e)
1000 hPa
EP
DEC
MAR
MAY
AC C
JAN
JUL
SEP
NOV
925 hPa 850 hPa JAN
MAR
MAY
JUL
SEP
NOV
0.8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1.0
(a)
0.9
0.9
2
(d)
R = 0.90, R = 0.81, P < 0.0001, n = 12
AOD at 550 nm (unitless)
0.7 0.6 0.5
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
0.4 0.3 Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
0.3 160
Dec
180
200
RI PT
AOD at 550 nm (unitless)
0.8
0.8
220
240
260
280
300
3
PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)
(b)
0.9
2
R = 0.86, R = 0.74, P < 0.0005, n = 12
0.8
200
PM10, BLH and f(rh) product
150
PM2.5, BLH and f(rh) prodcut
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
SC
AOD at 550 nm (unitless)
250
100 Jan
(e)
M AN U
3
PM, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)
300
0.3 140
Dec
160
180
200
220
240
260
3
PM2.5, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)
1.6
300
1.4
250
1.2
150 100 50
1.0
1.2
TE D
200
1.4
0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
(f)
2
R = 0.73, R = 0.53, P < 0.0001, n = 103
1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0.0 100
150
200
250
300
350
3
PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)
EP
0 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12
AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)
(C)
MODIS AOD at 550 nm over NCP (unitless)
350
1.8
AOD
PM10*BLH*f(rh)
AC C
3
PM10, BLH and f(rh) product ((g/m ) km)
400
-33-
Fig. 4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SMF4
SMF2
SMF1
RI PT
SMF3
SC
(a)
→
→
→ → →
II. Further northward progress of EASM significant RH increase and more intensive precipitation more efficient wet scavenging decrease of surface PM concentration.
TE D
→
→
AC C
EP
→
(b)
M AN U
I. Early stage of EASM moisture transported northward Converging with the precursor gases of aerosol over ECN initial increase of RH more efficient photochemical activity enhanced formation of the secondary aerosol.
Precursor gases of aerosol
Moisture associated with EASM
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
SC
RI PT
(a)
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
(b)
(c)
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 80°E
100°E
120°E
(a) SMF1 – SMF0 May 16 to June 10 – Apr 20 to May 15
50°N
(c) SMF1 – SMF0 May 16 to June 10 – Apr 20 to May 15
# S S# # S
S # S# # S
30°N
20°N
80°E
100°E (b) SMF2 – SMF1 June 16 to July 5 – May 16 to June
40°N
S # S# # S # S S # S # S S# # S# S# S # S # # S S # # S SS # S# S# S# S# # S # S # S# # S # S S # S # S # S # # S # # S # # S # S # SS # S # S# # S S S S# S# S # S SS# # S# S # # S# S S# # SS # S# S# # S# S# # S # S S# S# # S S# S S# # S S# # Diff_PM2.5 S# S # S# # S S # S # S# # S S # S # S# # S # S # S # S S# concentration S # S # SS # S# # S # S S # S # S# # S S# # (μg/m3) S # S# S # S # S # 45 to 280 S # S # S # 30 to 45 S S # S# # S S# S # S # S # # 15 to 30 S # # S S # S # S # S # S # S # 0 to 15 S # S# # S# S S# # S S# – 15 to 0 S # S # S# # S – 30 to – 15 S # – 45 to – 30 S # – 230 to – 45
–10
–8
–6
–4
–2
0
2
ΔRH (%)
4
6
8
10
6
8
10
(d) SMF2 – SMF1 June 16 to July 5 – May 16 to June
20°N
AC C
EP
S #
# S S# # S
(μg/m3) 45 to 280 30 to 45 15 to 30 0 to 15 – 15 to 0 – 30 to – 15 – 45 to – 30 – 230 to – 45
TE D
50°N
30°N
120°E
Diff_PM2.5 concentration
SC
40°N
M AN U
# S S # S SS# # S# S # S# S # # S # S S# S# # S # S # S # S # S # S# # S # S SS# # S S # S # # S # # S # S# # S# S # S# # S S S S# S# S # S SS# # S# S # # S# S S# # SS # S# S# # S # S # S S# # S# # S S# S S# # S S# # S# S # S# # S S # S# # S # S S # S # S# # S # S # S # # SS S # S # S# # S # S # S # S S # S# S # S S# S # # S # S # S # S # S # S # S S # S# # S S# S # S # # S # S # S # S # S # S # SS S# # S# S # S # S # S# S# # S # S S# # S# # S S # S #
RI PT
S #
–10
–8
–6
–4
–2
0
2
ΔRH (%)
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Highlights:
The AOD seasonality is distinct over NCP (maximum in June and minimum in
RI PT
December). BLH, RH collaborate with PM concentration can well explain monthly AOD
variation.
SC
June AOD increase over NCP relates to prevailing of the East Asia summer
AC C
EP
TE D
M AN U
monsoon.