Organo tin nucleophiles IV. Palladium catalyzed conjugate reduction with tin hydride

Organo tin nucleophiles IV. Palladium catalyzed conjugate reduction with tin hydride

Tetrahedron Printed in Letters,Vol.23,No.4,pp Great Britain 477-480,1982 0040-4039/82/040477-04$03.00/O 01982 ORGAN0 Pergamon Press Ltd. TIN N...

269KB Sizes 0 Downloads 20 Views

Tetrahedron Printed in

Letters,Vol.23,No.4,pp Great Britain

477-480,1982

0040-4039/82/040477-04$03.00/O 01982

ORGAN0

Pergamon

Press

Ltd.

TIN NUCLEOPHILES IV?

PALLADIUM CATALYZED CONJUGATEREDUCTION WITH TIN HYDRIDE

Ehud Keinan* Department

of

Organic

Chemistry,

and Pierre

The Weizmann

A. Gleize

Institute

of

Science,

Rehovot,

Israel

Abstract: Highly chemoselective conjugate reduction of a,@-unsaturated carbonyl now possible by using tributyl tin hydride with Pd(P@5)4; an optimization study importance of added radical scavenger and proton source in these reductions.

Chemoselective functions, tools

has been

and regiooffer

hydrogenation

has been

strikingly

a number of

of

The ability fashion

Herein

is

based

The reaction

of

as n-ally1 tin

suggested

over

to

the

hydrides the more

perform

a new highly

on trialkyl

tin

nucleophiles

hydride

serves

last

extent

chemoselective hydride

transfer

relevant

of

chemoselectivity

of

metal

catalytic

synthetic

hydrides,

hydrogenation2

metallic hydrides used are 7 ruthenium, 8 iridium,’ cobalt,

on highly

bound

of

palladium

as an hydride

has been

protonation,

In terms

tile

carbonyl

of

transition

methods

significant

reduction

as a,B-unsaturated

The arsenal

two decades.

traditional

to

functionalized

hydride

to

tin

reported, 12 to donor

hydride

should

catalyzed

donor

trialkyl

previously

as an efficient

an analogous

by concomitant

such

is

forth

and

molecules

in

challenge.

covalently species

bonds

and in particular

conjugate

a continuing

palladium

that

followed

within

metal

poses

reported

methodology,

tributyl

double

transformation.

reduction methods.> The most 4 5 6 rhodium, and to a lesser copper,

a controlled

such

enriched

advantages

activated

synthetic

metal

iron, 10

palladium.

of

desired

and stereocontrol,

and dissolving those

a long

compounds puts

activated

result

in net

conjugate

and water with 1,ll

reduction

as a proton

soft

electrophilic

Our recent

*-ally1

centers

finding

palladium

olefin-palladium conjugate

donor.

that

complexes,

complexes

reduction

of

Michael

acceptors. Indeed,

addition

of

tributyl

carbonyl

compound

containinga3

work-up,

resulted

in

in Table

I.

The striking bond,

Since sirable role of

side

the

the

reaction

reactions

and relative factorial

excellent

yield

sensitivity

as demonstrated

of

in Table

the

I,

involves

hydride

of

of

of

the

experiments

carbonyl

to

potential

organometallic

products,

THF solution

room temperature,

system

a great

a number of

a stirred at

a,@-reduced

reducing

holds

five

to

% Pd(Pp)3)4

and decomposition

importance plane

tin mole

the

species.

electronic

in terms

by H20/CH2C12

Results

are

shown

at the

double

chemoselectivity.

which study

different factors were evaluated, 13 as depicted in Table II.

477

an a,S-unsaturated

density of

species

an optimization

of followed

may lead

to

was carried

based

on 8

undeout.

x

The

8 matrix

478

Table

I.

Starting material

Conjugate

reduction

Bu3SnH (addition 1 eq./h)

with

Bu3SnH/Pd(P$3)4

rate

Product

(Yield) CHO

1.5

eq.

1.5

eq.

(Bu3SnD)

1.5

eq.

(work

1.7

eq.

(’ 99%)

(> 99%)

up with

D20)

(>99%)

CHO (98%)

3 eq.

(70%) recovered starting

4 eq. 1.7

material

(0%)

n

cl+

eq.

(>99%)

0

The semi-quantitative meters slow

(eq.

1)

hydride

presumably of

or

wise

addition

between

after

the

1)

Yield

(eq.

the

the

Under the

simplex

dozen

(%) = 20.7 optimized by the

Interestingly, as judged

addition

rate. (Table

of

conditions,

quantitative

Tributyl hydride ZnC12,

donor 17 sio

both

tin

hydride,

properties 18 or in

2’ played here by addition 20 tion conditions, the when the example

reaction of

tin

- 11x3

2

only

of

a typical

in

of

to

above

para-

the

effect

reaction

in favor

and radical

consideration,

an essentially

and

scavena step-

quantitative

- 8.9X4

- 3.5x5

+ 1.92x1x2

trisubstituted

- 2.42XlX3

olefins

were

were

reduced

also

reduced

citral:

w”

,

the

commercial

free-radical

two general

combination

1:l

mixture

at

the

with

cases:

highly

reducing either

in

electrophilic

agent,

highly partners.

15,16

polar 19

same

has

exhibited

medium containing The beneficial

role

a radical

need

was followed hydride

led

suppresses solvent

temperature

on the

III)

chosen

temperature

analysis. being

of

hand,

a small

between

Based

conjugated

reduction

z and E isomers

G.C.

is

first

higher

experiments.

98%

by the

other

There exists

and these

scavenger,

on the

catalyst.

method l4

-0

rate

yield

radical

phosphine,

+ 10.4X 1 + 5.3x

set

product’s

added

correlation

and hydride

modified

the of

palladium

no significant

resulting

as demonstrated

roles

Added triphenyl

temperature of

between

beneficial

rate.

Apparently,

sequence

yield

the

by over-stabilizing

benzene.

ger

correlation

revealed

acting

for

scavenger, the inertness of the benzyl chloride to the reac18 one equivalent of Bu3Snll and the absence of CIDNP effects 21 by NMR, suggest the present hydrogenation to be another rare only

as an hydride

donor.

A plausible

mechanism

involves

palladium

479

Table

II.

Factorial

plane

of

experiments

x2

x3

x4

x5

-

-

+

-

for

reduction

of

8 iononea

W-W Exp. No.

x1

l+-

Yield

xlx2

x1x3

+

+

5.4

(%)

2++--++

-

-

29.6

3+-+--+

-

+

25.7

4

++

+

-

-

-

+

65.8

5+--+-+

+

-

5.6

6++-+--

-

+

21.0

-

4.4

+

+

7.7

7+-+++-a++++++ a)

In each

experiment

and 0.03

a 5 ml solution

mmole Pd(P$3)4

(temperature)

containing

was subjected

to

:

(2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylphenol):

1 mmole 8 ionone

the

following

rate

(solvent)

Table exp. no.

temp.

of

Bu3SnH):

:

Simplex

III.

optimization

of

23’C

-

0.06

mmole

0.24

mmole

1 mmole/h

6 mmole/h

benzene

THF

8 ionone

reductiona

radical scavenger

solvent/proton source

yield

70.3%

9

4o”

0.48

eq.

benzene

10

60’

0.72

eq.

benzene

11

3o”

0.42

eq.

THF/H20

12

3o”

conditions:

O0

(triphenylphosphine): (addition

-c

29.7% (2.8

THF/H20 2.7

83.8%

eq.) (eq.)/

>98%

NH4C1 (2 eq.) a)

In each solution

catalyzed conditions

hydrostannation to

the

The expected stenone

or even

chemoselectively

parent

experiment

Bu3SnH was added

of

1 mmole f3 ionone

to

form

carbonyl

importance

of

an intermediate 22 compound.

steric

A1’4-cholestadienone reduced

in

and 0.03

excellent

factors to

this

yield:

enol

at

a rate eq.

1 eq./hr

to

a 5 ml

Pd(P$3)4.

stannane

was demonstrated reducing

of

system,

which

by the whereas

decomposes

resistance withanolide

under

protic

of A4-chole23 was D

480

OH OH in situ utilization of the intermediate Further scope and limitation studies, as well as -1 en01 stannane are in progress. AcknowledRement.

We

wish to thank the Sir Charles Clore - Weizmann Fund Post Doctoral Fellow-

ship and the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation for their generous support. References

1) 2) 3)

4) 5)

6)

7) 8) 9) 10) 11)

12) 13) 14) 15) 16)

17) 18) 19) 20) 21) 22) 23)

For early work in this area see: B.M. Trost and E. Keinan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2591, 2595 (1980). a. R.L. Augustine, "Catalytic Hydrogenation", Marcel Dekker, N.Y.C. (1965); b. M.Freifelder, "Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Synthesis", Wiley, N.Y. (1978). a. M. Smith in "Reduction", p. 95-170, R.L. Augustine Ed. Marcel Dekker, N.Y.C. (1968); b. A.J. Birch and H. Smith, Q. Rev. Chem. Sot., 12, 17 (1958); c. H.O. House "Modern Synthetic Reactions". D. 173-181. W.A. Beniamin. Menlo Park Ca. (1972). J.P. Collmg, R.G. Finke, P.L. Matlock, R. Wahren, R.G: Kombto and J.I. Brauman, 3. Amer. Chem. Sot., 100, 1119 (1978) and ref. cited therein. a. T. Tsuda, T. Fuhii, K. Kawasaki and T. Saegusa, J. Chem. Sot. Chem. Comm., 1013 (1980); b. E.C. Ashby, J.J. Lin and A.B. Goel, J. Org. Chem., 2, 183 (1978); c. M.F. Semmelhack and R.D. Stauffer, J. Org. Chem., 40, 3619 (1975); d. S. Masamune, G.S. Bates and P.E. Georghiou, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., s, 3686 -974); e. R.K. Baeckman Jr. and R. Michalak, J. Amer. Chem. sot.. 96. 1623 119741. a.1: vima and-T. Kbgure, Tetrahedron Lett., 5085 (1972); b. T. Hayashi, K. Yamamoto and 111. Kurnada,Tetrahedron Lett., 3 (1975); c. A.J. Birch and K.A.M. Walker, J. Chem. Sot.(C) 1894 (1966); d. R.E. Harman, J.L. Parsons, D.W. Cooke, S.K. Gupta and J. Schoolenberg, J. Org. Chem., 34, 3684 (1969); e. J.F. Biellman and M.J. Jung, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 2, 1673 (1968); f. F.H. Jardine and G. Wilkinson, J. Chem. Sot. (C), 270 (1967); g. J.P.Candlin and A.R. Oldham, Discuss, Faraday Sot., 46, 60, 92 (1968); h. T. Kitamura et al. Chem. Lett., 379 (1973), 203 (1975). a. D.L. Reger, M.M. Habib and D.J. Fauth, J. Org. Chem., 34, 3860 (1980); b. J.Kwiatek, Catal. Rev., 1, 37 (1967); c. R.W. Goetz and M. Orchin, J.xmer. Chem. Sot., E, 2782 (1963). Y. Sasson and J. Blum, J. Org. Chem., 40, 1887 (1975). J. Blum et al., Tetrahedron Lett., 192571981)*. N.A. Cortese and R.F. Heck ,,J. Org. CF., 43, 3985 (1978). a. J. Godschalx and J.K. Stille, Tetr edron Lett., 2599 (1980). Fox-relatedwork see also: b. D.Milstein and J.K. Stille, J. Amer. Chem. Sot., 101, 4981, 4992 (1979), J. Org. Chem., 44, 1613 (1979). E. Keinan and N. Greenspoon, accompanying manuscript in this issue. O.L. Davies Ed., “The design and analysis of industrial experiments", Oliver andEoyd, London (1954). G.E.P. Box and D.W. Behnken, Ann. Math. Statist., 2, 838 (1960). H.G. Kuivila. Svn.. 499 (19701. Non selective conjugate reduction with Bu SnH via a free radical mechanism is reported to require photochemical or thermal (15O'C) snitixon: a. M. Pereyre, G. Colin and J. Valade, Tetrahedron Lett., 4805 (1967); b. M. Pereyre and J. Valade, Tetrahedron Lett., 489 (1969). W.P. Neumann and E. Heymann, Ann., 683, 11, 24 (1965). N.Y.M. Fung, P. DeMayo, J.H. bauble and A.C. Weedon, J. Org. Chem., 9, 3977 (1978) and references cited therein. A.J. Leusink et al., J. Organomet. Chem., 13, 155, 163 (1968). Reduction of an equimolar mixture of benzalacetone and benzyl chloride resulted in quantitative reduction of the first compound and the recovery of the unreacted benzyl chloride. The reaction was followed by 270 MHz NMR, with spectra being recorded every ten seconds. An analogous stepwise conjugate reduction based on rhodium catalyzed hydrosilylation, followed by acid hydrolysis has been reported (see ref. 6a,b), however, lower selectivity was noted (e.g. compare-reductionof 8 ionone). F.W. Eastwood,I. Kirson, D. Lavie and A. Abraham, Phytochem., 19, 1503 (1980).Applfcation of this method to selective transformations in the Withanolide series will be published elsewhere. (Received in UK 20 November 1981)