Osteoarticular tuberculosis in a general hospital during the last decade

Osteoarticular tuberculosis in a general hospital during the last decade

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Osteoarticular tuberculosis in a general hospital during the last decade G. Ruiz, J. GarcõÂa RodrõÂguez, M. L. GuÈerri and A. GonzaÂl...

58KB Sizes 0 Downloads 99 Views

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Osteoarticular tuberculosis in a general hospital during the last decade G. Ruiz, J. GarcõÂa RodrõÂguez, M. L. GuÈerri and A. GonzaÂlez Servicio de MicrobiologõÂa y ParasitologõÂa ClõÂnica, Hospital Universitario `La Paz', Madrid, Spain

Objective To study clinical features of skeletal tuberculosis diagnosed in our laboratory

over the last 10 years.

Methods We carried out a retrospective observational study of 26 patients with osteoar-

ticular tuberculosis recording clinical and microbiological data.

Results Pain was the main clinical presentation. The median time from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis was 8 months. Synovial ¯uid was the most common sample obtained. Bone disease and previous or concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis were the most important predisposing factors. The tuberculin test reaction was positive in 83.3% of the patients. The outcome was favorable in 69% of the patients. Weight-bearing joints were the most commonly involved sites. Conclusions A high degree of suspicion is still needed to avoid a delayed diagnosis that might complicate the outcome. Keywords Bone and joint tuberculosis, osteoarticular Accepted 10 October 2002

Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9: 919±923 INTRODUCTION Osteoarticular tuberculosis (TB) represents 1±5% of all cases of tuberculous disease [1±3] and 10± 18% of extra pulmonary involvement [4,5]. Signs and symptoms are frequently nonspeci®c [1,6] and easily misdiagnosed as brucellosis [7], aspergillar spondylitis [8], tumormetastasis [4] and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis [9]. Moreover, up to 50% of patients do not show concurrent pulmonary disease [3]. Because of this, the disease is dif®cult to diagnose [10]. The delay in diagnosis may range from months to years [1±3,6,11,12] and it may damage joints or cause spinal cord compression resulting in paralysis [10]. Therefore, it is very important to maintain a high degree of clinical suspicion, especially in Spain where the TB rate per 100 000 inhabitants is one of the highest among

Corresponding author and reprint requests: J. G. RodrõÂguez, Servicio de MicrobiologõÂa y ParasitologõÂa ClõÂnica, Hospital Universitario `La Paz', Paseo de la Castellana no. 261, 28046 Madrid, Spain Tel: ‡34 9 17277372 Fax: ‡34 9 17277372 E-mail: [email protected]

the developed nations (38.5 cases/100 000 inhabitants in 1999) [13]. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of skeletal tuberculosis, to evaluate clinical data and the time to diagnosis in cases con®rmed by culture in our laboratory over the last 10 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS We carried out an observational retrospective study in a tertiary university hospital, with 1200 beds providing care for 700 000 inhabitants. A case of skeletal tuberculosis (STB) was de®ned as a patient with one or more osteoarticular samples (bone biopsy, articular ¯uid, synovial biopsy, etc.) positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis by culture. We reviewed the charts of 26 patients diagnosed with osteoarticular tuberculosis con®rmed by culture from 1991 to 2000. We recorded age, gender, clinical presentation, predisposing factors, time to diagnosis, number and type of samples, yield of samples, treatment and evolution. Allsampleswereculturedinliquidmedia(Bactecß 460R, Becton-Dickinson or MB-Bact/Alertß 3D,

ß 2003 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

920 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 9 Number 9, September 2003 Organon Teknika, Boxtel, the Netherlands) and on solid medium (Coletsos, Biomedic sl. Madrid, Spain). The cultures were incubated at 37 8C for 5 weeks in liquid media and 8 weeks on solid

medium. The mycobacteria were identi®ed by standard procedures using speci®c nucleic acid probes (Accuprobe, Gene probe Biomerieuxß) for M. tuberculosis complex or biochemical tests

Table 1 Main clinical features Age (years)

Predisposing factors

Clinical presentation

Site of infection

Time to diagnosis

Outcome

1 2

4 78

Pain and swelling Pain

Knee Hip

2 months >10 years

Favorable Favorable

3

72

Pain and FD

Femur and hip

>10 years

FD

4

6

ND

Knee

ND

ND

5

70

Pulmonary TB Close relatives with pulmonary TB Rheumatoid arthritis previous fracture Parents with AFB in sputum None

Knee

5 months

Torpid

6 7

60 74

Pain, swelling and FD Pain Swelling and FD

Knee Knee

4 years 4 months

Favorable Favorable

8

59

Knee

4 months

Favorable

9

52

3 months

Favorable

10 11

5 5

Shoulder and clavicle Ankle Knee

1 year 4 years

Favorable Favorable

12

20

Sacrum

1 year

Favorable

13

25

Pain

Knee

5 months

Favorable

14

61

Pain and fever

Sacrum

5 months

Favorable

15

2

Swelling and FD

Knee

3 months

Favorable

16

60

Pain

Knee

PD

ND

17

61

Fistula

Upper arm

PD

Favorable

18

49

ND

Lumbar

1 year

Favorable

19 20

29 66

Pain Pain

Lumbar Knee

2 months 1 year

Favorable Favorable

21

65

Pain

Lumbar

2 years

Exitus

22

26

Spinal discitis

1 month

Favorable

23

75

Fever, pain and FD Pain, swelling and FD

Knee

2 years

Favorable

24

75

ND

Knee

PD

ND

25 26

73 31

Pain Pain, swelling, fever and FD

Knee Knee and sacrum

8 months PD

ND Exitus

Patient

Knee arthroplasty NIDD and Paget disease Knee neoplasia Kidney recipient, arthritis, pulmonary TB Positive PPD relatives Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and pneumonia Bronhcopasm and scoliosis Husband with pulmonary TB Kidney recipient and HCV hepatitis Paratracheal adenopathy Bone TB 1 year before, AFB in sputum, silicosis and COPD Previous bone and pulmonary TB Lumbar trauma and pulmonary TB None Breast cancer with bone metastasis Pulmonary TB and silicosis None Knee degenerative arthritis and knee prosthesis Previous TB and knee prosthesis Gout, asthma and COPD HIV positive, intravenous drug abuser and disseminated TB

Pain, FD and fever Pain Pain and swelling Pain, swelling and FD Pain and fever

TB, tuberculosis; FD, functional disability; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; ND, no data available; NIDD, non-insulin dependent diabetes; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PD, previously diagnosed.

ß 2003 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 9, 919±923

Ruiz et al Osteoarticular tuberculosis in the last decade 921

(the Niacin test, Niacin reagent strip remel, Lenexan, USA). RESULTS M. tuberculosis was cultured in 1233 patients. Twenty-six of them (2.1%) showed osteoarticular involvement. Twenty-®ve patients came from Spain and one patient came from China. There were 16 male and 10 female patients with a male/ female ratio of 1 : 6. The mean and median age was 46 and 60 years, respectively, with a range from 2 to 75 years. The main clinical data are shown in Table 1. Radiological abnormalities were found in 21 of the 26 patients. Out of these 13 had evidence of local radiological abnormalities, ®ve had local and chest abnormalities and three had chest evidence of tuberculous disease without radiological ®ndings of osteoarticular involvement. Synovial ¯uid was the most frequent sample received (21 samples) followed by abscess (15), bone tissue (seven) and synovial tissue (®ve). The yield of these samples was as follows: bone tissue, 86% (six positives out of seven samples cultured); synovial tissue, 69% (three out of ®ve); abscess, 66% (10 out of 15) and synovial ¯uid, 66% (14 out of 21). The median time to diagnosis (time from the onset of symptoms to positive culture) was 8 months with an interquartile range of 3.5± 24 months. The mean time to diagnosis was 12.3  14.2 months (the mean time was calculated excluding the two outlier patients with more than 10 years of delay in diagnosis). The most important predisposing factors were: concurrent or previous pulmonary tuberculosis (ten patients); bone disease (nine patients); nontuberculous pulmonary disease (four patients); immunode®ciency (®ve patients) and tuberculosis in a close contact (four patients). Puri®ed protein derivative (PPD) skin test results were recorded in 18 patients. Fifteen were positive (83.3%). Isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide and/or ethambutol were the drugs most commonly used in our patients (21 out of 26). Twelve patients underwent surgery, mainly to obtain samples for culture. The outcome was recorded in 22 cases. Eighteen had a favorable outcome (de®ned as no relapses or functional disability). Three cases had an unfavor-

able outcome (torpid evolution or functional disability). One patient died of unrelated pulmonary causes. DISCUSSION The association between age and STB is controversial. In our study 50 % of the patients were over 60 years old. Houshian et al. found similar results in a Danish population with a mean age of 66 years [10]. However, other authors mention that patients less than 40 years old are said to constitute the group at the greatest risk for peripheral tuberculous arthritis [2]. Predisposing factors are present in other reports in about 30±40% of patients [1,3,6], but some series have shown no predisposing factors [10,11]. We found evidence of previous pulmonary tuberculosis or compatible radiological ®ndings in 34% of the cases. Moreover, the rate of concurrent pulmonary tuberculosis was 23%, lower than other previously reported [3]. Tuberculosis is more commonly seen in immunosuppressed patients; we found ®ve cases (19%) that showed some concomitant condition associated with immunosuppression including diabetes mellitus (one patient), renal transplant recipient (two patients), breast cancer with bone metastases (one patient) and one AIDS patient who was also an intravenous drug abuser. This last condition has been described to be an important risk factor [11]. Pain is described as the most frequent clinical complaint [14]. In our series, 20 patients (83%) showed pain as the main clinical feature followed by functional disability and swelling. The osteoarticular areas involved are compared with other cases reviewed in the literature in Table 2. Several reports have shown the spine as the most common location [3,6,10]. However, our data suggest the knee as the most frequently involved area. This increased involvement of the knee may be owing to the vulnerability of these joints to trauma and the high prevalence of osteoarthritis. Lower extremities were the most frequent sites recorded in younger (0±14 years) and elderly (over 60 years) patients. Middle-aged patients, however, showed the spine to be the primary location. Although the PPD skin test remains an important diagnostic tool, several reports notice variable percentages of PPD-negative patients [3,6,9]. From

ß 2003 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 9, 919±923

922 Clinical Microbiology and Infection, Volume 9 Number 9, September 2003 Table 2 Comparison of involved areas (in percentage) with other reports reviewed

Present study (n ˆ 26) Al-Saleh et al. [1] (n ˆ 27) Garrido et al. [2] (n ˆ 52) GonzaÂlez-Gay et al. [3] (n ˆ 32) Houshian et al. [10] (n ˆ 95) Evanchik et al. [6] (n ˆ 11)

Knee

Spinal

58%

27%

Hip

Ankle

Upper extremities

8%

3.8%

7.7%

41%

3.7%

15%

7.4%

23.4%

35%

1.7%

14%

8.7%

37%

15.6%

50%

0

3.1%

6.2%

7.3%

50%

6.3%

5.2%

22%

17.3%

39%

4%

8.7%

21.7%

n, number of patients. One patient had tuberculosis in more than one location, spinal and knee. included. Sternoclavicular location included.

18 patients with this test recorded, three were negative: one was an AIDS patient, the second a 2-year-old patient with a knee involvement and the third a 20-year-old male with spinal tuberculosis. Our data support the fact that a negative tuberculin test does not rule out STB. As the literature emphasizes [6,9], tissue samples (bone or synovial) yielded the best results. This fact highlights the importance of biopsy samples, which should always be available in order to reach the diagnosis. The delay in diagnosis of osteoarticular tuberculosis is very common [10]. Some researchers report an important decrease in time to diagnosis of 3±6 months on average [15], but it often remains misdiagnosed as an entity [6,12]. In our study, the time to the diagnosis ranged from 2 months to more than 10 years and the median time was 8 months. One third of the patients (nine) were not diagnosed until after 1 year. In addition to a low suspicion level, the lack of a rapid microbiological diagnostic method increases the time needed to con®rm the clinical suspicion. Currently, the development of molecular techniques of genome ampli®cation shorten the time required, but these techniques are focused on respiratory samples [16] and they are not standardized for extra-respiratory samples. Promising results have been reported in selected nonrespiratory samples [17] but more data are needed to con®rm its usefulness as a diagnosis tool. Osteoarticular tuberculosis can be treated with medical therapy alone, surgery or both. Surgical treatment is useful in the management of spinal instability, cord or nerve compression, large abscesses, and drug-resistant mycobacteria or as



Sacroiliac location

a diagnostic procedure to obtain samples [6]. The drugs currently recommended are isoniazid along with rifampin, plus pyrazinamide if the isoniazid resistance rate (IRR) is less than 4%. Ethambutol or streptomycin must be added to the therapeutic regimen if the IRR is unknown or equals 4% [18]. The time required for effective treatment is controversial; the duration of medical treatments ranges from 9 to 12 months and are longer in immunocompromized hosts [18±20]. Some series have shown a favorable outcome in 89% of the cases [6]. We found similar data in 18 out of 22 patients (81.8%). Although our study involved a small number of cases, and the results have limited statistical value, it shows how skeletal tuberculosis is actually managed in our environment where the disease remains a public health issue with a low, but signi®cant, percentage of osteoarticular involvement (1±5%) [3]. According to the outcome, it is very important to have a high level of clinical suspicion, especially in patients at risk and in countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. REFERENCES 1. Al-Saleh S, Al-Arfaj A, Naddaf H et al. Tuberculous arthritis: a review of 27 cases. Ann Saudi Med 1998; 18: 368±9. 2. Garrido G, Gomez-Reino JJ, Fernandez-Dapica P et al. A Review of Peripheral Tuberculous Arthritis. Sem Arthritis Reum 1988; 18: 142±9. 3. GonzaÂlez-Gay MA, GarcõÂa-PorruÂa C, Cereijo MJ et al. The clinical spectrum of osteoarticular tuberculosis in non-human immunodeficiency virus patients in a defined area of northwestern Spain (1988±97). Clin Exp Rheumatol 1999; 17: 663±9.

ß 2003 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 9, 919±923

Ruiz et al Osteoarticular tuberculosis in the last decade 923

4. GoÂmez RodrõÂguez N, IbaÂnÄez RuaÂn J, Ferreiro Seoane JL et al. Tuberculosis extrapulmonar diseminada con afeccioÂn cutaÂnea, ganglionar y oÂsea. An Med Interna 1999; 10: 525±6. 5. Meier JL. Mycobacterial and fungal infections of bone and joints. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1994; 6: 408±14. 6. Evanchik CC, Davis DE, Harrington TM. Tuberculosis of Peripheral Joints: An Often Missed Diagnosis. J Rheumatol 1986; 13: 187±9. 7. Cordero M, Sanchez I. Brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis. A comparative study of their clinical features. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 100±3. 8. Ur-Rahman N, Jamjoom ZA, Jamjoom A. Spinal aspergillosis in nonimmunocompromised host mimicking Pott's paraplegia. 1: Neurosurg Rev 2000; 23: 107±11. 9. Jacobs JC, Li SC, Ruzal-Shapiro C et al. Tuberculous Arthritis in Children. Diagnosis by Needle Biopsy of the Synovium. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1994; 33: 344±8. 10. Houshian S, Poulsen S, Riegels-Nielsen P. Bone and joint tuberculosis in Denmark. Increase due to immigration. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 312±5. 11. Ellis ME, El-Ramahi KM, Al-Dalaan AN. Tuberculosis of peripheral joints: a dilemma in diagnosis. Tuber Lung Dis 1993; 74: 399±04. 12. Gottlieb J, Noer HH. Skeletal tuberculosis. Two case reports with a delay in diagnosis. Acta Orthop Belg 1989; 55: 505±8.

13. Ancochea Bermudez J. Documentos teÂcnicos de Salud PuÂblica: Programa regional de prevencioÂn y control de la tuberculosis de la Comunidad de Madrid. Periodo 2000±03, 13±4. 14. Mader JT, Calhoun J. Osteomyelitis. In: Mandell, GI, Douglas, R, Bennet, J, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. New York: Medical Publications 1995, 1039±50. 15. Pertuiset E, Beaudreuil J, Liote F et al. Spinal Tuberculosis in Adults. A Study of 103 Cases in a Developed Country, 1980±94. Medicine 1999; 78: 309±20. 16. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Update: Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Tuberculosis. JAMA 2000; 284: 826. 17. Woods GL, Bergmann JS, Williams-Bouyer N. Clinical Evaluation of the General-Probe Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test for Rapid Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Select Nonrespiratory Specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 747±9. 18. Small PM, Fujiwara PI. Management of Tuberculosis in the United States. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 189±200. 19. Pertuiset E, Beaudreuil J, Horusitzky A et al. Nonsurgical treatment of osteoarticular tuberculosis. A retrospective study in 143 adults. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1999; 66: 24±8. 20. Sequeira W, Co H, Block JA. Osteoarticular tuberculosis. current diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ther 2000; 7: 393±8.

ß 2003 Copyright by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, CMI, 9, 919±923