Out of plane shear of a cracked rectangular orthotropic block

Out of plane shear of a cracked rectangular orthotropic block

Engirurring Fmclwr Mechanics Printed in GreatBritain. Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 641446, 1988 0013-7Y44/88 s3.tlo+ .tn, Pergamon Press pk. OUT OF PLANE S...

285KB Sizes 0 Downloads 54 Views

Engirurring Fmclwr Mechanics Printed in GreatBritain.

Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 641446,

1988

0013-7Y44/88 s3.tlo+ .tn, Pergamon Press pk.

OUT OF PLANE SHEAR OF A CRACKED RECTANGULAR ORTHOTROPIC BLOCK G. MELROSE and S. DAVIDSON Old Dominion University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Norfolk, VA 23529-0077. U.S.A. Abstract-The problem under consideration is the out of plane shear of a cracked rectangular orthotropic block. The exact solution is obtained by stating the problem in terms of a triple trigonometric series relation, which in turn can be shown to be equivalent to a singular integral equation whose solution is known. For the case of constant shear, the solution simplifies greatly and numerical results are given,

1. INTRODUCTION WE CONSIDER the out of plane shear of a cracked

coordinates

rectangular

orthotropic

solid. In Cartesian

the solid is given by the inequalities

while the crack which runs the length of the solid in the z direction is given by O
2. FORMULATION

AND STATEMENT

It is well known that for an out-of-plane u, =

and for an orthotropic

OF THE PROBLEM

shear the only non zero displacement w(x, Y)

is (2.1)

body the non zero stresses are given by 8W

uxxz= Gn -; ax

aw uyz = G23 ay

where G13, GZ3 are the shear moduli of the orthotropic therefore be satisfied provided 2

(2.2)

material. The equilibrium equations will

2

p2$+q=0

where p2=$. ay

(2.3 23

By symmetry, we now see that the problem is reduced to solving the following mixed boundary value problem. 641

G. MELROSE and S. DAVIDSON

642

p.d.e. b.c.

p2w,,+

(O
wyy=O

(2.4)

O
(1) w,(O, y) = w,(rr, y) = 0

(0 < y < A7r)

r(x) (2) w,(x, h7r) = -

(0 < x < 7r)

G23

(0 < x < a) U (b < x < 7~)

(3) w(x, 0) = 0 w,(x, 0) = 0 It is easily verified

(a -=cx < b).

that by writing

4x9

1 y) = --cW(x,

y) + 44x7

y)l

(2.5)

G23

where _ B, sinh nPy Boy + “;, np cash nphaCoS nx

w~(x, Y) =;

(2.6)

T(X) cos nx dx then 4(x,

y) must satisfy

p.d.e.

P2bX + 4yv = 0

(0 < x <

0 < y < h7T).

7-r;

b.c. (1) 4x(0, y) = 4xx(~ y) = o

(2.7)

(2.8)

(O< y
(2) 4+, Ad = 0

(0 < x -=c7T)

(3) $4x, 0) = 0

(0 < x < a)

4+(x, 0) = -f(x)

(a
44x, 0) = 0

(b
where f(x) = %

(X, 0) = i BO + c B, sech(nphn) II=1

3. DETERMINATION

OF THE

(2.9)

cos nx.

PERTURBATION

4

Clearly,

(3.1)

satisfies requires

the p.d.e. and the first two boundary conditions. that the {A,}; must satisfy the triple series

G(x) = AC)+ f

Furthermore,

n-’ A, cos nx = 0

boundary

condition

(3)

(O
n=l

F(x)

=

2

n=l

G(x)=A,+

A, tanh n/3hrrcos

nx = f(x)

i n-’ A, cos nx = 0 fl=l

(a < x < b) (b
(3.2)

Out of plane shear of orthotropic block

643

The solution of these triple series is given in[3] and is outlined here. By choosing

@(t)

(3.3)

dt

and b

A,=-27T (1 p(t)sinntdt

(3.4)

I

then we find 4(x, o) = G(x) = ~[(b - x)(x -

a,]J’;p(t)

dt

(3.5)

a

where H(u) is the Heaviside step function. We also find that,

Mt) dt (O
F(x)

=

i

(3.6)

where M(x, t) = - 2 c tanh(npAr) II=1

= -kiog

cos nx sin nr

tn(F)

+ tn(ff)

tn(F)

_ tn(F)

(3.7)

and tn(u) = tn(u, k) is a Jacobian elliptic function. (See appendix for more details.) It is now clear that the triple series will be satisfied if p(t) is given by the integral equation tn

J

-1 b 7T (1 &)&log

K” 0 7T

/Kx\

+tn

K’ 0) /it\

dt=-f(x).

(a < x < 6)

(3.X)

‘“W -‘“W I

From[3] we find that

(3.9) and

F (x)

3x,0) = -F(x)

rA,(x) =

I

(a < x < 6)

-f(x) -

(O
Knc($)dc(F) m&(x)

F*(x)

(b < x < ?7)

(3.10)

G. MELROSE and S. DAVIDSON

644

where

A(x)f(x) tn(F)

dx (3.11)

tn2(!c)

c =

_ tn2(g

.

_2K;LF)nc(F)dc(F) dt A(x)f(x) t(F) dx ,.b

Ib

I

A(x) = ([ tn’(F)

(3.12)

A(0

a

n tn2(F)

- tn2(F)][

tn2($)

- tn2(F)

- tn2($)]}“’

(3.13)

and

A,(X) = ([ m2(e)

- tn2(F)][tn2(F)

- tn2(e)])1’2

(3.14)

with K; = K(k;);

k, = tn(F)/tn(E).

4. STRESS INTENSITY

FACTORS

The stress intensity factors k, and k+ are given by the formulae, k, = lim ~a,,(x,O) x-a-

(4.1)

kb = lim -a,,(~,

0).

(4.2)

x-b+

For this problem, using (2.2) and (2.5) these equations become k, = lim m$ .X-a-

(x, 0)

(4.3)

0).

(4.4)

kb = lim Jz(r-b)$(x. x-b+

On substituting

(3.10) into (4.3) and (4.4) we obtain

kc, =

F,(a)

I

7r[tn2(F)

and

Kdn

(

Ka

- tn2(T)isn($)

112

)

(4.5) en(F)

Out of plane shear of orthotropic

kb = - F,(b)

645

block

I

5. NUMERICAL

(4.6)

RESULTS

FOR CONSTANT

SHEAR

For the special case of a constant shear the problem reduces greatly. First we observe that wr(x, y) = ry and hence f(x) = T. This allows us to simplify the singular integral terms F,(a) and Fr(b). Indeed, we find that

and

F,(b) -= 7

-2K;tn Kdn

(

fi

7r Ka ( ‘TT)

)

b

(5.2)

Z(6, k;) dt

Z(P,k;)-

with sin p = sn(F)

k2 = dn(F)/dn($); and sn’(F)

-sn’($)

sn2($)

- sn’($)

sin2 6 =

and Z(0, k) is Jacobi’s Zeta function.

1.2-

1.0 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Fig. 1. Stress intensity vs aspect ratio for various values of (As),

0.6

G. MELROSEand S. DAVIDSON

646 1.60-

-

k,/k,

---

k,/k,

c-r/4

1.60-

Fig. 2. Stress intensity vs aspect ratio for various values of (hp).

Figures 1 and 2 give the scaled stress intensities vs aspect ratio for various values of (A/3). Here k,, = & where d = (b - a)/2 and c denotes the midpoint of the crack. For c = ~r/2, by symmetry, we have k, = kb which is the special case investigated by Chang[2]. The results given here are in agreement with those obtained by Chang. We note how quickly k//c, degenerates to the results of an infinite strip with a central crack (A --, m) and the effect of orthotropy in this case is not very significant. For the off-center crack, however, the orthotropic property seems to have more bearing. APPENDIX The following notation, although standard, is listed here for completeness elliptic functions and integrals can be obtained from[4] and [5]. sn(y) = sn(y, k) en(y) - cn(y, k) My)

= My,

and clarity. An excellent introduction to

Jacobian elliptic functions with modulus k.

k)

tn(y)2w My)

complete elliptic integral of the 1st kind with modulus k.

K = K(k)

=~[l+2n~,e-*f12]2 k

2[

$ .-*,.+q

in terms of A, ratio of rectangular sides. modulus in terms of A.

n (1 K, = K(k,)

complete elliptic integral of the 1st kind with modulus k,.

K’ = K(k’)

associated complete elliptic integral of the 1st kind with modulus k’.

k’ = m

complementary

modulus.

REFERENCES [l] [2] [3] [4] [5]

0. L. Bowie and C. E. Freese, Int. J. Fracrwre Mech. 8, 49-57 (1972). S. S. Chang, Engng Fracrure Mech. 22, 253-261 (1985). G. Melrose, Doctoral Dissertation, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia (1984). F. Bowman, Introduction To EIIipric Functions with Applications. Dover, New York (1961). L. C. Woods, Theory of Subsonic Plane Flow. Cambridge University Press (1961). (Received I4 July 1987)