Outcomes of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy performed for malignancy

Outcomes of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy performed for malignancy

j o u r n a l o f s u r g i c a l r e s e a r c h  j a n u a r y 2 0 1 7 ( 2 0 7 ) 1 e6 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect jou...

240KB Sizes 0 Downloads 25 Views

j o u r n a l o f s u r g i c a l r e s e a r c h  j a n u a r y 2 0 1 7 ( 2 0 7 ) 1 e6

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.JournalofSurgicalResearch.com

Outcomes of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy performed for malignancy Annabelle Teng, MD,a,* Geoffrey Bellini, MD,a Erica Pettke, MD,a Michael Passeri, MD,a David Y. Lee, MD,c Keith Rose, MD,b Anton J. Bilchik, MD,c and Fadi Attiyeh, MD, FACSa a

Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York Department of Critical Care, Mount Sinai St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York c Department of Surgical Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, California b

article info

abstract

Article history:

Background: Studies on perioperative outcomes of octogenarians with gastric cancer are

Received 13 January 2016

limited by small sample size. Our aim was to determine the outcomes of gastrectomy and

Received in revised form

the variation of treatments associated with advanced age (80 y).

25 June 2016

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from

Accepted 3 August 2016

2005 to 2011. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for malignancy were identified using

Available online 12 August 2016

International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes.

Keywords:

Results: Of 2591 cases, 487 patients were octogenarians (80) and 2104 were non-

Gastric cancer

octogenarians (<80). Overall, 4.9% of patients had disseminated cancer. Octogenarians had

Gastrectomy

higher 30-d mortality (7.2% versus 2.5%, P < 0.01) and more major complications (31.4%

Elderly

versus 25.5%, P < 0.01), though fewer octogenarians underwent total gastrectomy (24.0%

Octogenarian

versus 43.2%, P < 0.01) and extended lymphadenectomy (10.1% versus 17.4%, P < 0.01) than

American College of Surgeons Na-

the nonoctogenarian cohort. On multivariate analysis, age 80 y was associated with major

tional Surgical Quality Improve-

complications (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.03-1.6; P ¼ 0.03) and increased mortality (OR, 3.0; 95% CI,

ment Program (ACS-NSQIP)

1.9-4.9; P < 0.01). Conclusions: Advanced age (80 y) was associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy for malignancy. Therefore, careful staging is necessary to reduce unnecessary operations in this population. Furthermore, surgeons must place greater attention on optimizing the octogenarian population before surgery. ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction While the incidence of gastric cancer has been decreasing in the United States, it remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide.1 Although early screening, combined with advances in modern surgical therapy, chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy have improved survival

for patients with gastric cancer in the developed nations in the East, 5-y survival for newly diagnosed gastric cancer in the United States remains dismal at 29.3%.2-6 In 2015, there were 24,590 new cases of gastric cancer diagnosed in the United States and 10,720 deaths.6 As the population ages, more elderly patients will undergo gastrectomy for treatment of gastric cancer. Gastrectomy performed

* Corresponding author. Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai St Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 10th Ave Suite 2B, New York, NY 10019. Tel.: þ1 (212) 523 6970; fax: þ1 (212) 523 6495. E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Teng). 0022-4804/$ e see front matter ª 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.020

2

j o u r n a l o f s u r g i c a l r e s e a r c h  j a n u a r y 2 0 1 7 ( 2 0 7 ) 1 e6

for gastric cancer in the United States carries a high perioperative morbidity and mortality.7 Many studies looking at the outcomes of “elderly” patients have used a cutoff age of 70 y. This is, however, very close to the median age of diagnosis, which is 69 in the current era.8-10 Furthermore, most series examining the perioperative outcomes of octogenarians are limited in size.11,12 Therefore, we examined the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participant user file (ACS-NSQIP PUF) to examine the perioperative outcomes of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy for malignancy. Our aim was to determine the 30d mortality and morbidity of this patient population and to study the variation of treatments associated with advanced age (80 y).

Methods After obtaining exemption from our institutional review board, we performed a review of the ACS-NSQIP PUF database. The ACS-NSQIP PUF database is a risk adjusted outcomesbased program designed to measure and improve the quality of surgical care. The program collects data on over 130 preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinical variables. In addition, 30-d postoperative mortality and morbidity data are collected in the database. Currently, there are over 300 hospitals that participate in this program.13 The ACS-NSQIP PUF database was queried from 2005 to 2011 for gastrectomy performed for malignancy. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for subtotal and total gastrectomies (43620-43622, 43631-43634) were used in conjunction with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes (151.x) to identify all patients who underwent gastrectomy for malignancy. Secondary CPT codes were used to identify additional organ resections, and CPT code 38,747 was used to identify extended lymphadenectomy defined as regional lymph node dissection including celiac, gastric, portal, peripancreatic with or without the para-aortic, and vena cava regions. All emergent cases were excluded from our analysis. Clinically relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative events including 30-day mortality and complications were noted and reviewed. Major complications were defined as occurrence of one of the following events: superficial and deep organ space infection, wound dehiscence, reintubation, prolonged ventilation, pulmonary embolism, acute renal failure requiring dialysis, cerebral vascular accident, coma greater than 24 h, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, need for transfusion greater than four units postoperatively, sepsis, septic shock, and return to the operating room. All clinical factors in the ACSNSQIP database are defined in the user guide.14 Patients were grouped into octogenarians (80 y) and nonoctogenarians (<80 y). Categorical variables were analyzed between the two groups by chi-square test and continuous variables with Student’s t-test and ManneWhitney U test where appropriate. In addition, multivariate stepwise logistic regression was used to evaluate advanced age as an independent variable on occurrence of mortality and major postoperative complications. We also studied other clinically relevant preoperative variables to

generate odds ratios for factors associated with mortality and occurrence of major complications. All statistical analyses were performed on SPSS for Windows version 23 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

Results Patient demographics and characteristics We identified 2591 gastrectomies performed for malignancy in the NSQIP database. The average age of the cohort was 66.6  13.7 y. Of these patients, 487 were octogenarians (mean age, 83.8  3.1 y). A significantly higher proportion of octogenarians had cardiac, pulmonary, and neurologic comorbidities compared to nonoctogenarians. Furthermore, a higher proportion of octogenarians had American Society of Anesthesiology III/IV classifications, worse functional status, and lower average body mass index compared to nonoctogenarians. Overall, 4.9% of the patients who underwent gastrectomy had a diagnosis of disseminated cancer. However, the proportion of patients with disseminated cancer, the sex profile, and preoperative weight loss were similar between the two groups (Table 1).

Treatment characteristics A significantly lower proportion of octogenarians underwent radiation therapy (0.8% versus 3.2%, P ¼ 0.004) and chemotherapy (1.6% versus 7.3%, P < 0.001) before gastrectomy compared to nonoctogenarians. However, the rate of a prior surgery within 30-d before gastrectomy was similar between the two groups (0.8% versus 1.4%, P ¼ 0.360). Octogenarians underwent less extensive operations compared to nonoctogenarians. Only 24.0% of octogenarians underwent total gastrectomy compared to 43.2% of nonoctogenarians (P < 0.001). In addition, fewer octogenarians underwent extended lymphadenectomy (10.1% versus 17.4%, P < 0.001). The rates of additional organ resection were similar between the two groups except for pancreatic resection, which was greater in the nonoctogenarian group (2.8% versus 1.6%, P < 0.042). Additional operative details are summarized in Table 2.

Outcomes The rate of 30-d mortality in this overall cohort was 3.4%, and the rate of major complications was 26.5%. The 30-d mortality rate in octogenarians was nearly 3 times that of nonoctogenarians (7.2% versus 2.5%, P < 0.001). In addition, octogenarians experienced significantly higher rates of major complications compared to nonoctogenarians (31.4% versus 25.5% P ¼ 0.008), even with less extensive operations. Specifically, in descending order, the rates of pulmonary complications, septic shock, and cardiac complications were significantly higher in octogenarians. The rates of pneumonia and unplanned intubation were almost twice as high in the octogenarian group. However, the average time to death and the length of stay were similar between the two groups (Table 3).

3

teng et al  gastrectomy in octogenarians

Table 1 e Comparison of demographics and comorbidities between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians. Characteristics

Age (mean)

Female Disseminated cancer

0.752

1235 (58.7)

273 (56.1)

History of TIA

51 (2.4)

35 (7.2)

<0.001

868 (41.3)

214 (43.9)

53 (2.5)

18 (3.7)

0.152

105 (5.0)

22 (4.5)

History of CVA and/or neurologic deficit History of CVA and/or no neurologic deficit

34 (1.6)

20 (4.1)

0.001

0.499

0.663 <0.001

88 (18.1) 349 (71.7)

IV

106 (5.0)

49 (10.1)

4 (0.1)

Diabetes Chronic steroid use <0.001

2020 (96.0)

441 (90.6)

75 (3.6)

40 (8.2)

9 (0.4)

6 (1.2)

CNS comorbidities

Endocrine history

1 (0.2)

Functional status (before surgery)

Ascites

ETOH (2 drinks/d 2 wk before surgery)

2042 (97.1)

471 (96.7)

0.694

26.7  6.4

25.1  5.2

0.001

>10% Weight loss in last 6 mo

359 (17.1)

70 (14.4)

0.150

Do not resuscitate status (yes)

8 (0.4)

4 (0.8)

0.196

381 (18.1)

94 (19.3)

0.540

34 (1.6)

11 (2.3)

0.328

Gastrointestinal history

Smoker (within 1 y)

Transfer status

BMI (mean)

2 (0.4)

0.001

742 (35.3)

Admitted from home

11 (0.5)

83.8  3.1

1252 (59.5)

Totally dependent

Preoperative dialysis dependence

62.6  11.9

III

Partially dependent

P value

P value

I-II

Independent

Aged  80 y, (n ¼ 487), n (%)

Aged  80 y, (n ¼ 487), n (%)

ASA class

Unknown

Aged <80 y, (n ¼ 2104), n (%)

Aged <80 y, (n ¼ 2104), n (%)

Gender Male

Table 1 e (continued ) Characteristics

13 (0.6)

5 (1.0)

0.328

455 (21.6)

25 (5.1)

<0.001

72 (3.4)

11 (2.3)

0.189

ASA class ¼ American Society of Anesthesiology Classification System; BMI ¼ body mass index; CHF ¼ congestive heart failure; CNS ¼ central nervous system; COPD ¼ chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CVA ¼ cerebral vascular accident; ETOH ¼ alcohol abuse; heme ¼ hematology; HTN ¼ hypertension; meds ¼ medications; MI ¼ myocardial infarction; onc ¼ oncology; PCI ¼ percutaneous coronary intervention; TIA ¼ transient ischemic attack.

Preoperative comorbidities Cancer history (heme/ onc) Radiotherapy (<90 d)

68 (3.2)

4 (0.8)

0.004

Prior chemotherapy (<30 d)

154 (7.3)

8 (1.6)

<0.001

83 (3.9)

28 (5.7)

0.076

Bleeding disorders Cardiovascular history HTN (requiring meds)

<0.001

1094 (52.0)

376 (77.2)

MI (within 6 mo)

13 (0.6)

4 (0.8)

0.616

CHF (within 30 d before surgery)

16 (0.8)

7 (1.4)

0.151

Angina (in 1 mo before surgery)

13 (0.6)

9 (1.8)

0.008

Cardiac surgery

118 (5.6)

62 (12.7)

<0.001

PCI

136 (6.5)

61 (12.5)

<0.001

35 (1.7)

15 (3.1)

250 (11.9)

82 (16.8)

No dyspnea

1854 (88.1)

405 (83.2)

Severe COPD

100 (4.8)

42 (8.6)

4 (0.2)

1 (0.2)

History of distal revascularization Pulmonary history Dyspnea at rest/exertion

0.041 0.003

Discussion

Renal history Preoperative acute renal failure

On multivariate analysis, age 80 y was an independent risk factor associated with death (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.9-4.9; P ¼ 0.003). The strongest predictor of death was performance of concomitant small bowel resection (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.0-10.7; P < 0.001) followed by splenectomy and colon resection. Additional factors associated with mortality include total gastrectomy, pre-operative weight loss, dyspnea, and functional dependence (Table 4). Extended lymphadenectomy was not associated with increased mortality (OR, 1.0, 95% CI, 0.81.3, P ¼ 0.797). Age 80 y was also an independent risk factor associated with the occurrence of major complications (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.03-1.6; P ¼ 0.025) on multivariate analysis. Other factors associated with the occurrence of major complications include total gastrectomy, additional organ resection, preoperative dialysis, and functional dependence (Table 5). Extended lymphadenectomy was not associated with an increase in morbidity (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.76-1.23; P ¼ 0.790).

0.945 (continued)

Despite the improvement in perioperative care and modern surgical technique, gastrectomies performed for malignancy in the United States carry high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Our analysis serves as the largest study to date of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy. The octogenarian

4

j o u r n a l o f s u r g i c a l r e s e a r c h  j a n u a r y 2 0 1 7 ( 2 0 7 ) 1 e6

Table 2 e Treatment details.

Table 3 e Postoperative adverse events.

Characteristics

Aged < 80 y, (n ¼ 2104), n (%)

Aged  80 y, (n ¼ 487), n (%)

P value

Characteristics

Anesthesia time (min)

300.3  120.2

265.0  107.2

<0.001

Death

Surgery time (min)

237.1  104.0

201.0  90.2

0.003

Preoperative treatment Prior surgery (within 30 d)

29 (1.4)

4 (0.8)

0.360

Radiotherapy (<90 d)

68 (3.2)

4 (0.8)

0.004

Prior chemotherapy (<30 d)

154 (7.3)

8 (1.6)

<0.001

Total gastrectomy Partial gastrectomy

908 (43.2)

117 (24.0)

1196 (56.8)

370 (76.0)

<0.001

Extended lymphadenectomy

366 (17.4)

49 (10.1)

Pancreatic resection

39 (2.8)

20 (1.6)

Hepatic resection Splenectomy

28 (1.3)

4 (0.8)

<0.001 0.042 0.359

113 (5.4)

18 (3.7)

0.129

Esophagectomy

17 (0.8)

3 (0.6)

0.663

Small bowel resection

62 (2.9)

12 (2.5)

0.564

Colectomy

60 (2.9)

15 (3.1)

0.786

Intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (yes)

143 (6.8)

44 (9.0)

0.083

Return to operating room

173 (8.2)

29 (6.0)

0.093

P value

<0.001

53 (2.5)

35 (7.2)

12.5  8.2

12.8  7.6

0.867

Days to discharge

10.8  8.5

11.9  9.5

0.020

Return to operating room

173 (8.2)

29 (6.0)

0.093

Major complications

537 (25.5)

153 (31.4)

0.008

MI

19 (0.9)

10 (2.1)

0.030

Cardiac arrest

27 (1.3)

13 (2.7)

0.025

Cardiac complications

Pulmonary complications 121 (5.8)

53 (10.9)

<0.001

Unplanned intubation

97 (4.6)

45 (9.2)

<0.001

Ventilator dependence > 48 h

107 (5.1)

31 (6.4)

0.257

Pulmonary emboli

25 (1.2)

7 (1.4)

0.654

Deep venous thrombosis

29 (1.4)

7 (1.4)

0.994

Acute renal failure requiring dialysis

14 (0.7)

7 (1.4)

0.087

Progressive renal insufficiency

13 (0.6)

3 (0.6)

0.996

Cerebral vascular accident with deficit

8 (0.4)

4 (0.8)

0.196

Coma >24 h

6 (0.2)

2 (0.4)

0.338

158 (7.5)

29 (6.0)

0.232

82 (3.9)

35 (7.2)

0.002

Renal complications

Neurologic complications

Infectious complications Sepsis Septic shock

cohort underwent less extensive operations compared to nonoctogenarians as evidenced by a lower rate of total gastrectomy (24.0 versus 43.2%) and extended lymphadenectomy (10.1% versus 17.4%). Despite less extensive surgical procedures, octogenarians still experienced a higher rate of complications and mortality compared to nonoctogenarians. Our study is noteworthy in that extended lymphadenectomy was not an independent predictor of worse outcomes. In the Dutch gastric cancer trial, extended lymphadenectomy (D2) resulted in significantly higher postoperative mortality compared to the limited lymphadenectomy (D1) offsetting any potential long-term effect in survival.15 However, in the Dutch trial, splenectomy was routinely performed as part of the D2 dissection. In our study, extended lymphadenectomy without additional organ resection did not increase postoperative mortality or morbidity. This suggests that in the modern surgical era, extended lymphadenectomy can be safely performed. While the ACS-NSQIP database, does not explicitly define extended lymphadenectomy as D1, D2, or state the number of nodes harvested, it describes a regional lymphadenectomy which goes well beyond harvesting just the perigastric nodes (regional lymph node dissection including celiac, gastric, portal, peripancreatic with or without the para-aortic, and vena cava regions). Furthermore, octogenarians received

Aged  80 y, (n ¼ 487), n (%)

Days to death

Pneumonia

Additional procedures performed

Aged < 80 y, (n ¼ 2104), n (%)

Urinary tract infection Superficial wound infection Deep incisional wound infection Wound disruption Organ space infection

84 (4.0)

27 (5.5)

0.128

119 (5.7)

29 (6.0)

0.798

36 (1.7)

3 (0.6)

0.074

35 (1.7)

6 (1.2)

0.492

146 (6.9)

26 (5.3)

0.201

MI ¼ myocardial infarction.

significantly less preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Previous studies with smaller patient populations have shown increased morbidity and mortality for octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy.12,15 However, our study is the first to show in such a large cohort that age 80 y itself confers a significantly higher risk for 30-d perioperative complications and a three times higher 30-d mortality risk on multivariate analysis. These results suggest that surgeons need to place greater emphasis on preparing and optimizing the octogenarian population before heading to the operating room. In a recent study, however, Ghignone et al. surveyed 251 surgical members of either the European Society of Surgical Oncology or the Society of Surgical Oncology and found that the majority of surgeons do not consider age as a potential limitation to

teng et al  gastrectomy in octogenarians

Table 4 e Multivariate analysis of preoperative factors associated with an occurrence of a major complication. Prognostic factors Age  80 y

Adjusted, OR (95% CI) 1.3 (1.03-1.6)

P value 0.025

Total gastrectomy

1.6 (1.3-1.9)

<0.001

Colon resection

2.7 (1.7-4.5)

<0.001

Pancreatic resection

2.3 (1.3-4.2)

0.004

Splenectomy

1.6 (1.1-2.3)

0.019

Preoperative dialysis

3.4 (1.04-11.3)

0.042

CI ¼ confidence interval; OR ¼ odds ratio.

surgery. They also found that only about one-third of those surgeons coordinate their patient’s care with a geriatrician.16 Another recent study by Sakurai et al.17 examined the preoperative nutritional status of 594 patients with gastric cancer that underwent gastrectomy and found that 5-y survival was significantly worse in the patient cohort with a lower preoperative nutritional status. Combined with the current literature, our results strongly suggest that further research into the optimization and the multidisciplinary coordination of preoperative care of the octogenarian population is necessary in an attempt to improve postoperative morbidity and mortality for gastrectomy. Our examination of the ACS-NSQIP database also shows that there may be room for improvement in patient selection in both patient cohorts. Approximately 5% of the patients in the ACS-NSQIP database who underwent elective gastrectomy for malignancy had disseminated cancer, with no difference between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians (4.5% versus 5.0%). The current National Cancer Comprehensive guideline states that carcinomas should be considered unresectable in the case of positive peritoneal cytology (M1 disease) even in the absence of gross peritoneal disease and that gastric resection should be reserved for palliation of symptoms (obstruction or uncontrollable bleeding).18 In a retrospective review of 1241 patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who underwent laparoscopy with peritoneal washing for gastric cancer, 291 (23%; 198 with visible metastatic disease and 93 without gross disease but positive

5

cytology) patients had metastatic disease.19 Therefore, it is possible that the use of diagnostic laparoscopy with peritoneal lavage as a separate staging procedure may have helped to avoid unnecessary gastrectomies in patients with disseminated cancer. Another limitation of this study is that we were unable to determine whether gastrectomy was performed open or laparoscopic. Currently, outside of high-volume centers, laparoscopic resection of gastric cancer is not commonly performed in the United States.17 However, groups with extensive experience from both the West (United States and Europe) and the East (Japan, Korea, and Taiwan) have shown that in carefully selected patients, a minimally invasive surgical approach can improve perioperative outcomes with equivalent oncologic outcomes.20-26 Other studies examining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery for elderly patients undergoing different anatomic resections have also been performed. For example, Frasson et al. performed a randomized study comparing the effects of open and laparoscopic colorectal resections in patients <70 and patients 70. They concluded that laparoscopy in this case improved short-term outcomes for the elderly cohort more so than in the younger population.27 Further study into the laparoscopic approach for gastrectomy in the octogenarian population is warranted.

Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest series of octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy for malignancy in the literature. Perioperative morbidity and mortality of gastrectomy performed for malignancy is high, especially for octogenarians, in the United States. However, extended lymphadenectomy without additional organ resection did not increase morbidity or mortality in either patient cohort. Given such a high rate of perioperative morbidity and mortality, preoperative nutritional optimization as well as coordination of care for octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy may be an avenue to decrease their postoperative complications. Further research into preoperative care for octogenarians is necessary. Also, careful patient selection is paramount to avoid the potential complications of gastrectomy in patients who will not benefit from the operation. In our study, we found that nearly 5% of patients had disseminated cancer. Careful staging of these patients may reduce unnecessary operations.

Table 5 e Multivariate analysis of preoperative factors associated with 30-d mortality. Prognostic factors Age  80 y

Adjusted, OR (95% CI) 3.0 (1.9-4.9)

P value 0.003

Total gastrectomy

2.0 (1.3-3.3)

0.003

Colonic resection

3.2 (1.4-7.7)

0.007

Small bowel resection

4.6 (2.0-10.7)

<0.001

Splenectomy

3.5 (1.8-6.8)

<0.001

Weight loss

1.8 (1.1-3.1)

0.018

Dyspnea

1.8 (1.04-3.1)

0.036

Functionally dependent

2.7 (1.4-5.3)

0.003

CI ¼ confidence interval; OR ¼ odds ratio.

Acknowledgment The American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of the data used herein: they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the author. Authors’ contributions: Conception and design were done by D.Y.L., A.T., A.J.B., and F.A. Analysis and interpretation and drafting of the article were executed by D.Y.L., A.T., G.B., M.P., E.P., and K.R. Data collection was carried out by D.Y.L., A.T.,

6

j o u r n a l o f s u r g i c a l r e s e a r c h  j a n u a r y 2 0 1 7 ( 2 0 7 ) 1 e6

and E.P. Critical revision was done by A.J.B., K.R., F.A., G.B., D.Y.L., and A.T. 14.

Disclosure 15.

The authors report no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article. 16.

references 17. 1. Ferro A, Peleteiro B, Malvezzi M, et al. Worldwide trends in gastric cancer mortality (1980-2011), with predictions to 2015, and incidence by subtype. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1330e1344. 2. Inoue M, Tsugane S. Epidemiology of gastric cancer in Japan. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:419e424. 3. Matsuzaka M, Fukuda S, Takahashi I, et al. The decreasing burden of gastric cancer in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007;212:207e219. 4. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in 2010. Cancer Res Treat. 2013;45:1e14. 5. Chiang CJ, Chen YC, Chen CJ, You SL, Lai MS, Taiwan Cancer Registry Task Force. Cancer trends in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:897e904. 6. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program: SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Stomach Cancer. Available at: http://seer. cancer.gov/statfacts/html/stomach.html. Accessed September 22, 2015. 7. Papenfuss WA, Kukar M, Oxenberg J, et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3008e3014. 8. Bartlett EK, Roses RE, Kelz RR, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC. Morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy using the American College of Surgeons national Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surgery. 2014;156:298e304. 9. Schwarz RE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Factors predicting hospitalization after operative treatment for gastric carcinoma in patients older than 70 years. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184:9e15. 10. Saidi RF, Bell JL, Dudrick PS. Surgical resection for gastric cancer in elderly patients: is there a difference in outcome? J Surg Res. 2004;118:15e20. 11. Takeshita H, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, et al. Surgical outcomes of gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2013;37:2891e2898. 12. Kim JH, Chin HM, Jun KH. Surgical outcomes and survival after gastrectomy in octogenarians with gastric cancer. J Surg Res. 2015;198:80e86. 13. American College of Surgeons. Data Collection, Analysis, and Reporting. Available at: http://site.acsnsqip.org/program-

18.

19.

20. 21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

specifics/data-collection-analysis-and-reporting/. Accessed May 31, 2012. American College of Surgeons. Acs NSQIP Userguide for the 2010 participant Use data file. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2011. Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ, Putter H, et al. Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2069e2077. Ghignone F, van Leeuwen BL, Montroni I, et al. The assessment and management of older cancer patients: a SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons’ attitudes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42:297e302. Sakurai K, Ohira M, Tamura T, et al. Predictive potential of preoperative nutritional status in long-term outcome projections for patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:525e533. Network NCC. NCCN Clinical Pracie Guldeins in Oncolgoy Gastric Cancer (Version 3.2015). Available at: http://nccn.org/ professionals/physicians_gls/PDF/gastric.pdf. Accessed September 22, 2015. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year followup results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:439e449. Strong VE. Laparoscopic resection for gastric carcinoma: Western experience. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21:141e158. Strong VE, Devaud N, Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit D. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1507e1513. Ding J, Liao GQ, Liu HL, Liu S, Tang J. Meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2012;105:297e303. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric Cancer: short-term outcomes from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263:28e35. Haverkamp L, Weijs TJ, van der Sluis PC, van der Tweel I, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1509e1520. Jeong O, Jung MR, Kim GY, Kim HS, Ryu SY, Park YK. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:184e191. Xiong JJ, Nunes QM, Huang W, et al. Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8114e8132. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:296e300.