Journal
of Nuclear Materials North-Holland. Amsterdam
135 (1985) l-10
OXIDATION OF TRITIUM IN PACKED BED OF NOBLE DETRITIATION FROM SYSTEM GASES Masabumi NISHIKAWA, Mikio ENOEDA Department Received
Toshiharu
TAKEISHI,
METAL
CATALYST
Kenzo MUNAKATA,
Kenji
FOR
KOTOH
and
of Nuclear Engineering, Kyushu lJniversit.v, Hakozaki. Higashi - ku, Fukuoka 812, Japan
30 August
1984; accepted
6 April 1985
Catalytic oxidation rates of tritium in the bed of the noble metal catalysts are obtained and compared with the oxidation rates observed for the packed bed of spongy copper oxide or hopcalites. Use of Pt- or Pd-alumina catalysts is recommended in this study because they give effective oxidation rates of tritium in the ambient temperature range. The adsorption performance of tritiated water in the catalyst bed is also discussed.
1. Introduction A multi-barrier containment concept will be applied to control tritium in a fusion power plant. The rationale for this concept is the prevention of the dilution of concentration in each barrier so that the tritium can be recovered before it penetrates to the outer barrier. Tritium cocentration of more than tens of thousands ppm will be handled in the primary containment which consists of the equipments and pipes to enclose the tritium bearing materials in the plasma fuel and exhaust system, the breading blanket system and the fuel processing system. It has been reported by Kuroki et al. [l] that almost all tritium in the plasma exhaust gas should be recovered for use to keep the self sustained plasma when only the bred tritium is supplied. Nishikawa et al. [2] have recommended to handle tritium in the oxide form for this purpose. As nearly all of the primary containment system will be enclosed in a secondary containment .with an inert gas atmosphere, tritium of a rather low concentration is handled in the secondary containment system under the steady state operation, while tritium of high concentration should be dealt with in case when some troubles happen with the primary containment system. Gloveboxes are used for the secondary containment. The reactor building serves as the tertiary containment and an emergency cleanup system will recover tritium from the room air to minimize the environmental release of tritium. Application of the catalytic oxidation operation is considered to handle tritium in each containment system as reported by Kershner [3] and Ortman et al. [4].
0022-3115/85/$03.30 0 Elsevier Science Publishers (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division)
However, detailed pre-examinations are needed to select the most suitable operational conditions to each tritium handling system becasue of a wide variety in concentration of tritium or hydrogen isotopes, gas components accompanying with tritium, chemical form of the tritium bearing materials, gas flow rate, pressure and temperature. In this paper, catalytic oxidation rates of hydrogen isotopes in the bed of noble metal catalyst are discussed and compared with the oxidation rates observed for the packed bed of spongy copper oxide or hopcalites reported elsewhere by the present authors [5,6]. Effects of gas flow rate and bed temperature on the overall oxidation rate are also discussed.
2. Theory The tritium balance following equations: Vn(dC~n.n,rn/df)
=
in each enclosure
&H,D,T,T
-
-
Q~~H.D.T,T
’
c1 -
is given by the
&H.D.T,T
C~H,D,T)T.~/C~H.D.T)T
-P~(CO,D,T~)~ b@C&.D,T)To/df)
=
R(H,D,T,TO
(1) -
-
Q~~H.D.T)To
’
(I
-
&H,D,T,TO
C~H.D.T)TO.~~C~H.D.T)TO
-P’~(C~H,D.T,TO).
B.V.
1
1 (2)
where VE. t. R. q and Q mean volume of the enclosure. time, teak rate from the inner enclosure or production rate in the enclosure. leak rate from the enclosure to the outer space and volumetric flow rate of gases to the enclosure detritiation system. rcspecitvelv. and /I/ x lo\\ ( ~,H.WI,T) and p’f( C;,,,,,, ,,(,) mean permeation through the tnctosure watt and glove\. respectiveI\ C‘(,,,,).,,, means the tritium concentration in the rnclosure and any combination. HT. DT or ‘I‘,. i\ to br taken according to the chemical form of tritium handled. A schematic diagram of the multi-harrier containment system is shown in fig. 1. Concentration of tritium gas in the enclosure. and the concentration at inlet to the enclosure c;~,~~.~j~. from the detritiation system. C&D,TjT,,, are related as follows using the decontamination factor at catalyst bed. K, assuming the perfect mixing model in the enclosure:
~~H.D.T)T,~ = qw,,r,,/K,.
(3)
c (H.D)D.!
(4)
=
C,H,D,Il/Kt,~
C H,.I = C,JK,,
.
where C;tl.t),LO.,means
the concentration of Lvater swamped to the gas flow at the inlet of the adsorption bed in the detritiation system to make hure of adsorption of triliated water if necesbarq. I and 1 are u’ater concentration at the outlet of the catalyst bed and the adsorption bed, respectively. and both value\ can he estimated from the breakthrough curves for water adsorption using the following equations.: “‘=/‘(q,[,
,),()’ 7‘).
(5)
where K,. K, and K, are different because of the isotope effect in transfer processes in the oxidation. Concentration of tritiated water in the inlet gas to the enclosure from the detritiation system, C&r3,7I1o,, is shown as follows where no other unit operations than
where M. y. U, 2. t‘. C&o,,,,,, and T mean water concentration in the adsorbent, packed density of bed. superficial gas velocity in the bed. axial length of the
Air -_
Air
I
letritiation
1
system
detritiation
I I I 1 enclosure I ,
enclosure
systen EO Leak HT-HTO --
Stack
errneat i
H20-02 -<<- --HTO
[
Primary
I. Multi-barrier
c;tainfi~‘/“.“‘
Secondar; Tertiary
Fig.
i7j
containment
system
containment containment
detritiation system
3
bed, void fraction of the bed, equilibrium water concentration at the mass transfer interface and the absolute temperature, respectively, and K,,, is the overall mass transfer coefficient in the water adsorption. Details of the way to estimate the breakthrough curves in the water adsorption or desorption taking the hysteresis phenomena and the isotope effects in account are reported by Kotoh et al. [7]. It should be noted that x and y are not zero even before the breakthrough because there exists the limiting value for each driving agents below which the water adsorption does not proceed. The decontamination factor at the oxidation process is related to the overall mass transfer coefficient as
where K,, a and V,,, are overall mass transfer coefficient in the oxidation process, specific surface area of catalyst particles and catalyst bed volume, respectively. It can be seen from above equations that the overall mass transfer coefficient plays an important role in the detritiation performance and that catalysts which give larger I(, vafues at some oprationai conditioons are desired in use. As the overall mas transfer coefficient is usually given by the following equation, each mass transfer coefficient should be evaluated to understand the behaviour of tritium in the oxidation process: l/K,
= l/k,
+ l/flk,
+ l/k,.
initial tritium concentration mixing in the enclosure.
The pilot catalytic oxidation detritiation system is schematically shown in fig. 2 and various experimental conditions are shown in tables 1 and 2. A constant temperature bath or an electric furnace is used to heat the catalyst bed. The catalytic columns are made of Pyrex glass. Concentration change of hydrogen isotopes other than tritium is determined by using gas chromatography, and the tritium level is monitored by an ionization chamber continuously. Water vapour formed by the catalytic reaction is removed from the bulk gas stream by the packed bed of molecular sieves. activated alumina or silica gel before the analysis by gas chromatography. As for the bulk carrier gases. t\r. He. N, or dry air are used in this study.
stack
t water bubbter
=
%.r,.Td’[
e
{ 1 -
exP( KFQ~‘&/Q>
I] .
(12) The concentration change of the tritium in an enclosure is given by the following equation when R(,.,,,, is given by a pulse function as in the case of rupture of the inner enclosure or when the production rate of tritium suddenly becomes zero:
c(H.D.T)T
ionization
chamber
1 - exp( - K,d&,,/Q) =
c,“,.D.~l~
exp (
“E/Q) (13)
as-
3. Ex~rimentaI
01)
where. k,, @k, and k, are mass transfer coefficient due to oxidation reaction on the catalyst surface, mass transfer coefficient due to diffusional transfer of reactant in a catalyst substrate and mass transfer coefficient to transfer reactant from the bulk gas flow to the surface of catalyst particles, respectively. At the steady state operation, C,,,o,r,, is given by the following equation according to eqs. (l), (3) and (lo), as 4 and pf( C(rr,p,r,r) are usually negligibly small compared to other factors:
c(H.D.T)T
is the whereGI.~.T,T suming perfect
Fig. 2. Schematic
diagram
of experimental
apparatus.
4
Table 1 Experimental
4. Results and discussion conditions
(i)
Hydrogen isotopes Carrier gas Hydrogen isotopes concentration Superficial gas velocity Type of catalyst
Amount of catalyst in bed Diameter of catalyst bed Temperature of catalyst bed
Hz and D1 Ar, He or NL 100-20000 ppm 3-150 cm/s Pt-alumina. Pt-Ag. Pt-C‘. Pd-alumina, Pd-asbestos. Pt-hydrophobic substrate 0.5%30 g lo,16 and 19 cm 0&45O”C
4.1. Chewncul reuction
Applying the Wilson plot method [9] for the Arrhenius plot of the overall mass transfer coefficient in rather low temperature range around the ambient temperature, the following equations are obtained for the reaction using the Pt-alumina catalyst when oxygen concentration in the bulk gas stream is more than three times of the hydrogen concentration: k
Table 2 Experimental
r.H, = 8.82 x 10“ exp( - 10700/RT)
k KHZ .x r.r), conditions
: k,.m = 1 : l/2:
[m/h].
(14)
l/4,
(151
(ii)
Hydrogen isotopes Carrier gas Hydrogen isotope concentration Tritium level Superficial gas velocity Type of catalyst Amount of catalyst Diameter of catalyst bed Temperature of catalyst bed
Hz. D, and HT Ar or N, IO-2000 ppm 0.5-50 mCi/m’ IO-30 cm/s Pt-alumina. Pt-hydrophobic substrate 0.2-0.7 g 0.7 cm 0~200”c
The catalyst pellets are heated at 300°C for 2 h in dry gas stream containing a little hydrogen and/or oxygen by the reason stated elsewhere by the present authors [8]. Details of noble metal catalysts used in this study are shown in table 3.
Table 3 Details of catalysts
rute
Almost the same equations are obtained for the Pd--alumina catalysts. The isotope effect shown above agrees well with the following relationship proposed by the authors [6]: (k,),,/(k,),=
116)
{(krMkr)oJ-‘.
and (kr)7 are the chemical reacwhere (kr)“. (k,)o tion rates when protium, deuterium and tritium are limiting reactants, respectively. in this study, as shown in eqs. (14) k r,HT obtained and (15), is about one order larger than the values estimated using the correlative equation by Sherwood [lo] based on the data by Bixel and Kershner [ll]. This difference comes from the effect of the water amount in the catalyst as explained in the paper by Nishikawa et al. [8]. With the same procedure, k, for the Pt-catalyst with hydrophobic substrate is also obtained as follows: k
r.H,
k r.~:
=
1.46
x IO’” exp( - 25100jRT)
: k,.r,: : kr.,, = 1 : l/2.9
[m/h],
t 17)
: l/X.3.
(18)
used in this experiment
Catalyst
Content
Form
Pt-alumina Pd-alumina Pt-carbon Pt coated Ag Pd&asbestos PI-hydrophobic substrate
0.5% Pt 0.5-l o/r Pd 20% Pt 5% Pt
Pellet Pellet Granular Granular
3Om50% Pd
Fibrous
1% Pt 1% Pt
Pellet Sphere
Particle diameter
BET wrface area by Nz (m2/g)
(mm) l-3 3 1.2 1.2
1. 2 3
--80-110 150-240 140 0.3 17
M. Nishrkawa
The isotope effect shown in the above equation again agrees well with the relationship obtained from eq. (16). Comparison of eqs. (14) and (15) with (17) and (18) indicates that the catalyst with alumina substrate gives a larger oxidation rate for tritium, though the catalyst with hydrophobic substrate gives a larger oxidation rate for H,. 4.2. Diffusion rate in catalyst substrate K, 1/K,
at the elevated = l//3k,
temperature
is represented
as
+ I/k,.
[m/h]
for H,.
shows much smaller values as
&s,wz = 15.2fi
[m/h],
/3ks,Hz: /3k,.DI: /3k,,,,=
(22) 1 : l/3.1
flk a,~, : t%,D, : i%,w, : Ws,T, = 1 : l/1.38
: l/1.66.
(23)
The reason why so small values are observed for the hydrophobic substrate is not clear. However, it may have close relation to the pore size distribution of the substrate, as the decrease of K, with time is also observed at the oxidation process using molecular sieve (MS 4A) or hydrophobic substrate with fine micro pores as the substrate of the noble metal catalyst. 4.3. Gas phase mass transjer rate at inferjace For estimation of k,, correlative equations by Carberry [13] or Chu et al. [14] are often used. The present authors, however, recommended the following equation for the cases when the particle diameter in the packed bed is smaller than 3 mm: ( k,/u)&c2/3
= t.l5(R~/~)-“*(J~/~~~~~,
(24)
where d, and d,, are particle diameter and the standard particle diameter (= 3 mm), respectively, and the Schmidt number, SC, and the particle Reynolds number, Re,, are shown by the following equations:
(21)
The values of bk, are so large that they give effect on K, only at the elevated temperature and the large superficial gas velocity. /3k, obtained for the hydrophobic substrate in this
SC = PlU&, Rer = (d~~p/~~/(l-
(25) ~1,
0 observed R’%
(261
where p, p and DG are specific weight of the bulk gas, viscosity of the bulk gas and diffusional coefficient of hydrogen isotopes in the bulk gas, respectively. The isotope effect in k, can be estimated as follows from eqs. (24) and (25) in the argon atmosphere: k &HZ: k8.n21kg.,, 1kg.D, = 1 : l/l
---------I-------
: l/8.5.
(20)
From the correlative equation by Fujita for the diffusional coefficient of gas phase (121, the isotope effect on /?k, in the argon atmosphere is expected as follows:
: l/1,38
study, however,
(1%
because l/k, can be neglected. As /3k, is independent of the superficial gas velocity (though j3k, is independent of the superficial gas velocity (though k, is dependent as shown later), @k, is obtained as follows from fig. 3 for the Pt-alumina catalyst: /3k, = ll8@
5
et al. / Oxrdurmn of tritrunr
.24 : l/l
.24 : l/l
.40. (27)
KF
Comparison of k, with k, and k, shows that k, becomes the rate controlling step at the higher temperature than about 100°C for the noble metal catalysts with alumina substrate.
----
4.4. Overall mass transfer coefficient Pt-Alumina
Cot.
mlh
Fig. 3. Effect of superficial gas velocity on oxidation rate.
The estimated values for the overall mas transfer coefficients using eqs. (14), (15), (20), (21). (24) and (27) are compared with the observed values in figs. 4 and 5 for the Pt-alumina catalysts. As can be seen from these figures, solid lines representing the estimated values agree well with the observed values. These figures also indicate that Pt-alumina catalysts are available at the
_
t
r*
100
Pt-hydrophobic
dp-lmm
Pt-Alumina
uq2Ucmls
for H2D2 in Ar
‘8 261 /’
8’
estimated
observed o
H2 in Ar D2 in Ar
10 _ l
HT in N2
52 2.8
103 j
a( 261
32
34
observed
HT or) N2
value
HI
in
/
0
D2
in Ar
Ar
i
*
Hi in N2
I
l/K
plot of overall oxidation
value
0
/
3.0
rate for Pt-alumina
I 28
I 3.0
3.2
t
OC 100
I
80
I
I
Pt-A~urn~na t-l2 or 02
60
I
40
20
0
I
I
plot of overall suhstrate.
oxidation
rate for Pt cataivst
dp-3mm
in Ar
10: 3 .c ;‘
~ 10;
VOhX
observed
Fig. 6. Arrhrnius with hydrophobic
34 K-1
1000/T
150
G!-
A
5.9
\
A
10
I
I
I
2.4
2.6
28
I
I
3.2
$4
I
3.0
1000/T
Fig. 5. Arrhenius catalyst.
for H2.D2 tn Ar
$estimated
1 il
2.2
./
value
‘Ot
1000/1
r
substrote
value
o
Fig. 4. Arrhenius catalyst.
.
- .__&__
dp=Z?mm
ug=212em1s
HT in N2
O(
40
plot of overall oxidation
I
3.6
K-’
rate for Pt-alumina
ambient temperature without heating as reported b> Sherwood et al. [15]. though 300-400°C is required to get the reasonable oxidation rates of tritium when copper oxide or hopcalites is used as shown previousI> hv the present athors [5,6]. The estimated K, values for the Pt catalyst uith the hydrophobic substrate also agree well with the observed values as shown in fig. 6. K,- for the Pt-alumina catalyst under various condrtions are estimated in fig. 7. As is shown in this figure. k, is the rate controlling step at temperatures beloa several tens of degree of centigrade and X, nbovc 100°C. Accordingly, it is reasonable to heat the bed filled with the Pt-alumina catalyst to get a larger decontamination factor in the oxidation process when the bed temperature is below several tens of degree of centigrade. An increase of the superficial gas velocity or increase of the catalyst bed volume other than heating can be the resonable action to take when the bed temperature 1s already ahove 100°C. The pumping capacitk through the enclosure detritiation system, however. should have
Kozeny-Karman equation (161. It should also be noted that the isotope effect observed on the overall mass transfer coefficient varies with change of relative rates of k,, &k, and k,, as the isotope effect in each mass transfer coefficient is different. It is observed in this study that the activation energy or the isotope effect in k, keeps the same value for certain combinations of catalyst and substrate, though about 20-30s variation in the Frequency factor is observed when the catalysts from different factories or lots are compared. Accordingly, it is safer to check the frequency factor of k, for each catalyst with protium before packing into the catalyst bed of a detritiation system. Then, k, and consequently k, for other hydrogen isotopes can be obtained using eq. (18) and other equations stated above in this paper. When k,‘s for protium and deuterium are known, more close k, for tritium can be obtained by using eq. (15) than the value estimated using the method stated above. Though K, for fresh Pd-asbestos gives desirable values, it decreases rather rapidly with time. Pd-asbestos catalyst is not to be trusted for the long term use because of loose binding of Pd particles to the asbestos fibre and easily changeable density of asbestos flock. Pt-carbon catalyst gives the same performance as Pt-- or Pd-alumina catalyst. However. it cannot be used at elevated temperature because of occurrence of oxidation of the carbon substrate itself. Pt--silver catalyst with the composition shown in table 3 cannot be used for the oxidation of tritium because of the small reaction rate. This observation agrees with the tendency stated by Allison and Bond [17] as that 70 to 100% silver alloys with palladium was inactive at 100°C for hydrogen oxidation. High oxida-
ug = 64&m/s ,# 160cmis
“\.
k’t-Alumina cat dp= 3mm
\ \ 1’ \
Hydrogen isotope in Ar H2 D 2 7
____--__ ---T
I
I
20
2.2
I
I
2.6 24 1000/T
-l,
I
I
I
2.8
3.0
3.2
I 3.4
1
3.6
l/K
Fig. 7. Estimated overall oxidation rate.
some surplus when the superficial gas velocity or the catalyst bed volume is changed, because the pressure drop of gas stream through the packed bed is increased with increasing both parameters as shown by the
3mm R-Alumina cat.
OO
200 1
400 I Time
Fig. 8. Water adsorption
breakthrough
600 I
800 1 h
curve for Pt-alumina catalyst bed.
lOO0
x tion capacity, however, is expected for the palladiumsilver permeation membrane at the large palladium composition and at the higher temperature than several hundreds degree centigrade. Use of a small amount of Pt-silver catalyst in the upper course of the catalyst bed with the noble metal catalyst may be useful to scavenge sulfur compounds which are poison to the noble metal catalysts. 4.5. Water adsorption performance
of catalyst partlc1e.v
The tritium oxidized by the catalyst bed is expected to be adsorbed on the adsorbent placed at the downstream of the catalyst bed in succession. As the catalyst particles, however, usually have the fair capacity to adsorb water, it is necessary to evaluate the water adsorption breakthrough curve for the catalyst bed itself. Nishikawa et al. [18] observed that Ptor Pd-alumina catalyst adsorbed about one-third of water that could be adsorbed on activated alumina. Fig. 8 shows some examples of the water adsorption breakthrough curves by using eqs. (7)-(9) for several inlet water concentrations where the vapour pressure at the outlet of the bed before breakthrough is assumed to be 0.06 Pa based on the observation by Kotoh et al. [7]. Fig. 9 shows the amount of water trapped in the catalyst bed evaluated from the breakthrough curves. These figures show that a fair amount of tritiated water may be retained not only in the adsorption bed but also in the catalyst bed. Accordingly, dehydration operation should be also given to the catalyst bed to recover all tritium from the detritiation system, though no dehydration installations are given to the catalyst bed of the
emergency tritium cleanup system of the Trmum Syatern Test Assembly in Los Alamos 1191. It IS possible I&) avoid the water adsorption in the catalyst bed by using the noble metal catalysts with the hydrophobic SLIIF strate or by using the metal oxide. The overall mass transfer coefficients in the oxidation of tritium, ho\\.. ever. are rather too low to use in the moderate temperature range with these catalysts at the present state. The amount of tritium in the Pttalumina catalyst bed and the adsorption bed with molecular sieve (MS 5A) composing an enclosure detritiation system of thk: secondary containment is shown against time in fig. ICI. and various conditions assumed in estimation using eqs. (1).-(12) are listed in table 4. The breakthrough time ot tritiated water obtained hy using eys. (7)~-(9) 1s ,11so compared in table 5 for the catalyst bed and the adsorption bed. It can be seen from fig. 10 that a large portion of tritium is trapped in the catalyst bed especiallv before the breakthrough for the catalyst bed has CX’curred where utility frequency of gloves means a\ fo!lows: utility frequency
(2X)
It can also be expected that a catalyst bed of 10 kg and a MS 5A bed of several tens kg are enough for continuous operation of an enclosure detritiation system in the secondary containment for one year where the conditions are as those listed in table 4. The amount of tritium in the secondary enclosure estimated under these conditions by using eqs. (l)-(9) is shown in fig. 11 for the cases before the breakthrough of tritiated water for
I
Q =h0m3/h
0.10 -
I
Vcot=0.01m3 Db=O.l6m Pt-Alumina
1=25OC
humidity 90 %
cat. dp=3mm 70%
min
Tlmc Fig. 9. Amount
of water trapped
in the catalyst
bed
numher of gloves in use of gloves = __ total number of gloves
M. Nishikaw
er al. / Oxidation
of tritium
Y
x1(12 6
-----
trttium
caught
in cat bed
I,
MS bed
II
/ tritium released,’
G
4 utility frequency of gloves
._ ,s .-
2
0 time
day
Fig. 10. Tritium amount in catalyst and adsorption beds.
the adsorption bed has occurred. The tritium level in the secondary enclosure is kept at about 15 mCi/m3 without isotope swamping because the water permeated through gloves into the secondary enclosure from the tertiary
Table 4 Conditions for simulation enclosure * Prrmuly
of tritium
behaviour
in secondary
(0.9~10-~
atm-cc/s)
enclosure
Tritium amount handled Leak rate to secondary enclosure Secondarv enclosure System volume Gas circulation rate Glove (buthyl rubber) Glove surface area Glove thickness System gas Amount of Pt-alumina catalyst Amount of MS 5A Room (tertiary enclosure) temperature Room humidity
10h Ci IO-s/day
10 m’ 5h-’ 50 pairs 1 m*/pair 0.8 mm Argon 10 kg 20 kg 2o”c 60%
* As for threshold value at water adsorption 1 ppm for catalyst and 0.5 ppm for molecular sieve (MS 5A) is used.
enclosure acts as the swamped water, where permeation rates through gloves are estimated using values by Wittenberg et al. (201. The tritium level in the secondary enclosure increases at smaller utility frequency of gloves as shown in fig. 11 because of too low water concentration in the bulk gas stream to give effective water adsorption in the catalyst bed and the adsorption bed. The amount of tritium permeated to the tertiary atmosphere through gloves is about several hundreds of micro curies per day as shown in fig. 12 and nearly all is in the form of tritiated water.
Table 5 Breakthrough time (in days) at tritiated water catalyst bed and molecular sieve (MS 5A) bed Utility frequency of gloves (W)
Catalyst
100 50 25 10 5
6.4 12.1 25.6 155 *
* Inlet water concentration water adsorption.
bed
adsorption
for
MS 5A bed
199 287 515 1081 1926 is below
the threshold
value
at
r
tritlum
\
Secondary
enclosure
\
\
in the ambient
4dwrption grab&
\
amount
total
\
hecause
retained
in
--__
----___
;I
the
breakthrough
‘1..
temperature
performance fair
amount
catalyst
for
range.
of the catalyst i>f
bed
the catalyst
bed
tritiated
must w,iti‘r’
c\pecially
hel‘orc
hc ii the
bed.
_
HT form References
Ill
t
\“.--“‘“.” I
I
121M.
Nlshlkawa.
and M. Ohta. J. Nucl. SKI 1 ccl+
Y. Yamamoro
Energy Sot. Japan 25
utlllty frequency of gloves Fig. 11. Tritrium
H. NakaJima
nol. 10 (19X2) 186.
I 75
50
25
S. Kurokl.
A 100
%
level in atmosphere of secondary enclosure.
131 M.S.
Ortman.
E.M.
and S. M;ltsunng;~. J. :\iom~c
(1983)734
Larsen dnd Ahdel-Kh,illk.
nol.,~Fuu~>n 1 (1981)
ERDA-50. [41 C‘.J. Kerhwcr, burg. Ohio (June 1975).
Mound
I_‘thorat,w\.
151 M. Nlshikawa, T. Iuyam;r Technol. 70 (1983) 145.
and K. Shlnnal.
[61 M. Nuhikawa. K. Shlnnal. S. Ma~wnaga J. Atomic Sot. Japan 26 (lYX4) 70X
ic
~.
$
Tech
X~I,I~~I\-
.l. Nucl
\CI
;~nd 1. Kln~~\hlr,l.
111prrparatlkw. I71 K. Kotoh, M. Enoeda and M. Nl\hlkau:r. partly reported by M Enoedn II) hl. Fng. t&l\. K\tlxhu
400
4 ol SI
Nucl.
255.
)-
total ___-
_____---HTO
I “I\
amount
(1984).
[Xl M. Nlshlkawa. K. HigashlJima. and ~1.. lakeiahi, in preparstwn.
form
Meeting of AESJ, Tokyo.
191E.E I lOI 4.E.
37 (lY15)
Sherwood. CONF-761 Tech.. American
M
lznoed,~
partly reported in .Annu,tl
1983. and Osaka.
Wilson, Trans. ASME
Fwtem\
K. Munakata.
I.
101-t Nuclear
19X4.
47.
74th C’onf. on Rcmotc‘ Sot.. Wa\hln_econ. I)(‘.
1976
IllI
I.(‘. Bixel and C.J. Kerahnrr.
LlSAI:C Report uwy Fig. 12. Tritrium
LIZI I.
frequency of gloves
[Ii]
permeated to tertiary enclosure
through
gloves.
Wash-1332
FuJita, Kagaku-kikal
J.J. (‘arherry,
AlChE
mc,re Laboratory, Ilhl [I71 Catalytic
Ptstudy
oxidation
of the noble or
metal
Pd-alumina because
P.C (1077)
5. Conclusion
bed
they
rates catalysts catalysts give
of
tritium
in
the
are obtained is recommended
effective
oxidation
use of in
rates
E.<;.
C’drmsn.
B.G.
Wetteroth.
Monahan.
Griffith.
(‘hem.
R.A
Inatn.
I:ng. Progr.
McWilliam\.
UCRL.-52X1
Livermorc.
Trans.
234.
1. Laarencc
t S. 1 !\cr
(‘al. (July lY79). (‘hem.
Fngr\.
(L~lndon)
2:
1%).
.Alhson and G.C.
Bond. (.‘atalyus
Rev. 7 (lY72)
233.
pdr-tl! 11x1 M. Nlshikawn and M. Enoeda, tn preparation. reported in Annual Meeting of AE,SJ. Tokyo. 19X3
catalyst
and
15 (1951)
J. 6 (1960) 460.
I141 1.c‘. Chu. J. Kalil and W.A. 49 (105.3) 13.5. Sherwood. 1151 4.b Ilrlhe and <‘.M.
Proc. 2nd l:n\~r. I’r~~i c <)nt (1974).
this of
1191 R.V. Carlson. US-Japan Workshop on Tritium Handling. Lo\ ,Alamoa National Laboratory. Lo Alamo\. NM. 19X3. [XI]
L.J. Wlttcnherg.
CONF-760935
(1976).