P050 Evolution of familial aggregation of blood pressure over 17 years in children and young adults

P050 Evolution of familial aggregation of blood pressure over 17 years in children and young adults

A 1 J 1 N 9 4 PH 2 9 - 8 A A- P P B M I A B P P OP ORA L S T M E M A P aa C. M d b rl P A a e O IN A AR L P TO U NU U A Tc i ue e r e 1n...

140KB Sizes 0 Downloads 23 Views

A

1

J

1

N 9 4 PH

2

9

-

8

A

A-

P

P B M I A B P P OP ORA L S T M E M A P aa C. M d b rl P A a e

O IN A AR L P TO U NU U A Tc i ue e r

e 1nfonn6tica Departmentof MedicineIII , Bioeatatfstica M6xlicaof OportoSchoulof Medicine.IBMCof Oporto University. Obesityhasoccupiedan ambivalentstatusas a riakfactor for c a d Althoughit’s r diassociation i with otherrisk factors,perticrdadyhypertension,dislipidemias, and diabetesmellitus.has been clearly established,its independenceas a risk factorhas not. populationstudiea haveconsistentlyshownanassociation ketweenobesityand hypertension.The purposeof the presentstudy was to investigatethe relationship betweenBMI and blood pressurei a P p o o r p

P

1

OV

POSTERS: R EOpidemiology f R 223A L L

.

0

0

4

E G O fS LE G vO UR Y E O VFD N DAS O AOS B C D SV IE E N L GP G A I O LUR 1 T T Y E UI E I S O C A YOUNG H ADULTS. f L D Y . D Pereira,A.F.Freitaa l e qmaaMaccd&,A.T.Pinto,A. e i nt n i d x a r o et g m i *j .o ar c m s , . i edicina111,Bioeatatfstica ri t D&artmentof M e Inforntdtica aa f

M&ica of OportoSchcolof Medicine.IBMCof Oporto University.Portugal.

Familialaggregation v e a of blood s pressureis a c well known l a e r aftlmugh it’scausesrmnain controversial. Theaimof uthe s presentstudyis to evafuefethe presenceof a familial WS@@on fOI ~omi pressureand body mass index overa 17yea period,inordertoevefuetethe importance of a primarypreventionstrategybegiming in familial environment. t u-MI ~du mQU@S l g a t ie o s : A longitudinal cohortustudy was A l co s wn c g of ot i t nconstructed t h from autwo cmaa-aectiortef ud t asurveys o i 17 m m nw cdr a t l yeara n p e ra aput d e1032individuals,of da c r s o1 y a a o u4 s i n ci va tboth av sexes, i agedie5 to o 24 r l r ya u lt a f a i g o 2 a n5 t 5 y w r sr i 0 eg seen c in the o initialstudy, e 2o e and i their parenta a ue a 2 r me r yearawere i b o T b m v s o S a e D oin r a v e a f Cormfation ht t coefficients i B nand ou Ba n s ne h whenever poaaible. both . w c f e a t o wB al a e c a xu r a l o t a e M n g c t i e a g T p ro he sy r o w p cu stepwiseregrcasionenafysiswere e u e hr b nt p usedj to analysethe e t ns a e a s g c. i relatiomdrip between parentsandchildren. c i t fa B c lo ( K a (c < l t u lg e l h o g aM 2/ w o t i rme ni d 0 2 2 > 0T m 5 v o S- a D- 3 a 2 -: 2 Thecorrdationbetweenparent’sandchildren’s e 4 0l 9 h , , B nu Ba9 ) 9 ; e BPare:systoficBP-O.34 w a i a a p f i t aot i l a r gs h rQxO.01)anddkwtolic m s t h aBP-O.1h9 r c li r e h variablesare: t o B I t es o t xbm ve sM t (0.05);endfortheattthropmnetric e ac i r he v l lIo hheighta e t un a i s w h t i t f o a i w a s e t ih g 0.29(0.01); s n weight-O.41(@,01); t e hhi r r an a l t e e i sr c e ponderal indexd T fr be i p l f o e ra e 0 te t. r triapt i h vskinfold-0.21(p4.05) oe w eh c . 2 1a .nAlln ( the l s Pe t n e so t e a h ay B i b p s r we t i r e tcoeftleienta o e atafisficafly o n icM snignificative.The x s vrarianceof h i t n are o B I t l o t bp i se rB M e a e children’s r v hv DBPexplainedthrougha a ae Ih tsstepwise f Mi e o c af . n SBPand c w ha i n wt t v i o e5 r g ~8msSiMt a g i o a , e l r h h i 2 u t e e k s was The 1 1 a 3 a t0 v 8 f f 3 w , a e, skinfold,portderel , artdysisindex,and en2 rl47%. 1 prent’s n hchildren’sweight, 3SBP and o mDBP % u r% % d , e 4 1 ,a 2 % 8 3 % , ,9 9 n .4 5 , %% , W c t t p o f o rt s n i that i i h cwereaxxptedbythemodel. t nn h l h c ud u ai i dpd i e a en ~ The r i b nw aBP l i b t ol e a thereexistesau a b a B a B an o e i o ct Me a n oP t oe e u ru n farnifiai vr e a ev eg t o a h ry b s ibp t l a e a h se t n f ta a large ee nporpotionof sh s ing aihg explained g n po A no B a nBp al c o u t SS~@CRIfor t ll e BPmaybe ha n e t by eMos n i f r i ag uo v nre g ouol es trdi foe a c s r o sc aen no p a c gc i sa a u17years. s aba r s ta l o aii d in , in b i t K

s

t B l

W

p

rm

h e

i

so

so

n

gt

P

P D N

E O

O L W I

TV ~

E EM G FO , P

IR

Ogbuji,S.A.Fein,F.A.Ukoli,C.H.Bunker.Albany MedicalCollege,Albany,NY Weobtained96two-dimensionafly guidedM-modeand 101Dopplerechocardiogrsms with 118simultaneous brachiafbloodpresauresfrom119healthyNigerianoftlce workera(67M,52Fage45*7 yrs). Hypertension(SBPs 140andlorDBPz 90rnntHg)weepresentin 19%of the menand10Yo of thewomen.LVmaeslheightvs LV maaaiBSAwasgreaterinwomencomparedwithmen(17~ 11%vs 9* 9%,p < .05)suggestinga greaterweight-related effectonLVmessin thewomen,althoughobeaityper se wasintkquentin thecohort(BMIwas22.8t 4.3and25.8 ~ 8.0in menandwomenrespectively,allk@f2). LVHby BSAwaspresentin 13%of menand21%of women.Only 6/16personswithLVHhadelevatedbloodpreasureand most(12/17)casesof LVHhadrelativewallthickrress< .40,furthersuggestingthatnon-hypertensive LVHwas common.Ofnote,bothLVIWBSAandLVMlheightwere significantlyandcontinuouslyrelatedto SBP(bothR = .44, p< .001)evenwithinnormalrangesof bloodpressure. Dopplertrartamitralflowvelocityratio(E/A)averaged1.8 ~.9 forwomen,and 1.5~.5 form~ andwas independently relatedto age(p < .001)andSBP(p < .01), butrtottoLVmesa. In summary,echocerdiographic LVH is commonin middleagedAfrican(Nigerian)menand women,but it is mostlyphysiologic(increasedweightend athleticism)withrelativelylittleLVHdueto hypertension. K

u a K

W

Hypertension,Hypertmphy,Obesity

N ER

l W

d i uBe r d e pressure,familial ta~gation. u u d

n s i

y e

, d

e

n s a y

ka

i

n

0

0

MN AC MH E T A I R A I BOA B P C N F UL U R T MF E RK R A. P LU IOE BISE AR CR I R C I HS O ERA C AT H Y P E R T J N CM A R a MM EC vJC i ok a a a JG H a Wr e o M M 4N S D C d T S e np e a h a o a cm b o m b W c t r oev o e rB B lu p ( i o t re sa c a ar o a B W a ea a t cc i fm h t s o f e( ho t d H yv ip T ecf 6 p w et H a d s1 u t e W s m T w n c i oa n hh m t ni ee ba d t s C e h us dt l a ym i r su B ( D M w measuredby the S samephysician B B e

5

LMS LS LE o ANS V N E v n r rt rn r l r p i t sf r t l ld hh r) f u i di dy e oia h B

andmmparedwithvaluesathomeendpharmacy measuredby thepatientorfamilyandpharmacc utic(ambulatory BP).Visits were spaced each 1 t 3 monthsintervals.Three BP measurements w r and the meanwas e c c eo o nonr@high-nonnaf and e s i P w c ia 3 groups: l t a n s highb p H S rD a M l e e a x s o pB o

m e a

m d r t c ev o 1e 1 ac e 1l a s 4 r i m r (e H s pm t wp o
patienta. K

W

H b

p

b c

p o~

S r

O f

em a

e rl e

u

e

n

av s